American Spring or American Nightmare?

© Miri WTPOTUS 2011

Blowhard!  This would be amusing if we didn’t know that it just may be something that Barack Obama and most of his Marxist/progressive/domestic terrorist friends (Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dorhn, Van Jones, etc.) have been community organizing for, for years.  Global-warming guru Al Gore calls for an “American Spring”, such as the Middle East experienced over multiple “Arab Springs“–orchestrated, Internet-community-organized, George Soros-funded, astroturfed revolutions in the streets of their cities.  But we’re not alone.  Some have suggested recently that Israel, too, needs such a “Spring”. 

Might we remind Al Gore that these “Arab Springs” were extremely violent in most instances?  While Wikipedia prefers to blame the violence on the “reaction” of the governments, they do at least point out that “property” was attacked, police stations were “stormed,” riots occurred,  public buildings were burned and looted, cities were occupied, and over 17,000 people died.  The Wikipedia article even uses the unfortunate phrase, “days of rage”, to characterize these “uprisings.”  They sound more like a nightmare than peaceful, democratic “change.”

Do we now have a former Vice President of this country, on one of the most rabidly partisan, if not insane, television programs ever (Olbermann), calling for people to take to the streets and overthrow our government? 

That is, after all, what happened with these Arab Springs. Governments were overthrown. Constitutions were rewritten by the “winners”.

Yet it’s the likes of Al Gore who call patriotic Americans in the Tea Party “terrorists” and worse.  This week, Tea Partiers were called terrorists (by another vice president), hostage-takers, crazed people who point guns to the heads of the people or the president, morons who want only to blow up the country, cannibals, vampires, zombies, parasites, etc.  The list of epithets just keeps on growing.  

What Al Gore is doing sounds arguably like sedition. 

Sedition:  incitement of discontent or rebellion against a government; any action, especially in speech or writing, promoting such discontent or rebellion.

What did these Arab Springs accomplish? They overthrew governments and led to select groups grabbing power to REWRITE the Constitutions of those countries. Is this Obama’s plan via Gore? It would not be surprising, given Obama’s past history of association with radical graduates (or current members) of the Weatherman, the Weather Underground, SDS, CPUSA, the Black Panthers, and DSA.  Nor given the organizations with which Obama willingly chose to associate, such as ACORN, Gamaliel Foundation, Midwest Academy, SEIU, to name just a few.  Nor given the people Obama has placed into his administration, such as Van Jones, among far too many others.

Gore gratuitously implies that this progressive American Spring (led by ACORN, SEIU, and other unions, perhaps even the New Black Panthers, all of whom will use the wonders of the Gore-invented Internet to organize?) won’t be like the Tea Party.  Oh, no.  They will be nonviolent.

He says.

So here’s Gore implying, as so many other progressives FALSELY imply, that the Tea Party, against all evidence, is violent. 

In the Alinsky tradition, as well as continuing the despicable, transparent habit the left has of accusing others of one’s own tactics, inclinations, and motivations, Gore said:

[I] want to focus on one particular suggestion you had about using the wonderful digital tools that are newly available for the reinvigoration of democracy. Now, they have been around for a while, but they are spreading far and wide and more people are getting involved. We need to have an American spring — you know, the Arab spring. The non-violent part of it isn’t finished yet, but we need to have an American spring, a kind of an American non-violent change where people on the grassroots get involved again. Not the, you know, not in the Tea Party-style.

Mind you, Gore did say “change” and “non-violent;” but when he invoked the analogy of the Arab Spring, which was (sometimes violent) overthrow of governments, one might be excused for wondering exactly what it is that Gore proposes (Olbermann, as well).  Gore continued:

There are people who are genuinely upset in the Tea Party.  I understand that, but that movement was funded with seed money from right-wing billionaires, the Koch Brothers, and promoted on Fox News and turned into a stalking horse for this right-wing agenda that a lot of people have been trying to push on this country for a long time.

Like Nancy Pelosi (aka San Fran Nana), Gore accuses others of what the Democrats have LONG done. 

Think back to when Pelosi called the Tea Party “astroturfed” (while an aide referred to them as neo-Nazis), when all evidence proved that it was indeed a grassroots popular movement inspired by one business reporter who lost his cool on camera.  Not at FOX News, by the way; but on CNBC, sister station of MSNBC.  The Tea Party, from its inception, was and remains a peaceful movement which honors the Constitution of this Republic and follows its strictures. 

What did Tea Partiers do? They organized, they demonstrated peacefully, they held meetings, they ELECTED representatives, and they kept in contact with those representatives in order to ensure that their views were truly and fairly represented. This is the very essence of our representative democratic Republic.  Not democracy, Republic.

But Gore and most progressives prefer simple “democracy”, aka majority rule or MOB rule.  A majority that they unfortunately may rightly perceive is on their side, now that they’ve managed to absolve half the population from paying their “fair share” of taxes, meaning that almost a majority pay NO income taxes and some even get back money they never paid in (a reverse “refund”?). 

Now that they’ve managed to allow millions of illegal aliens into our country to demonstrate and demand rights from OUR government.

Does Gore want to send mobs into the streets to foment chaos before the election?  Do the progressives want Obama to have an excuse to suspend the election, like Chavez and other thugs are wont to do when they espy defeat on the horizon but wish so heartily to remain in power, boot firmly upon the necks of the people?  Or so, when Obama loses the election, as happened in Kenya with Obama’s communist cousin Raila Odinga, Obama’s rabid supporters can take to the streets, maraud, terrorize, perhaps even behave like Odinga’s Muslim terror shock troops, who burned Christians alive in their churches–all in a successful ploy to demand a “share” of the political power? Or to then, after the chaos settles, be able to rewrite our Constitution as progressives prefer it to read, without having to go through the “onerous” system of AMENDING it by the Constitutional process, because they know We the People will NEVER agree to the amendments they want? 

If such an American Spring takes place, will the UN step in to mandate that the “will” of the so-called minority “people” be accepted?  I can see it happening.

Obama and his progressive supporters want the United States under the thumb of world government, under the thumb of the UN.  Only then can they achieve their goal of disarming the American people and IMPOSING their “ideal” state on the people, by any means necessary. 

Notice that the left NEVER criticizes the vast amounts of money poured into Democrat coffers by George Soros.  But the Koch brothers are excoriated when, if true, they do exactly as Soros and the Democrats have done. Exactly what Soros  and his many minions in a vast web of “not-for-profit” foundations and progressive organizations have done for years.  This is INDEED a stalking horse, designed to create a New World Neo-Communist Order, with elites like Soros and his friends Gore and Obama, controlling all economies and all peoples, for the “good” of the “world community.” To redistribute and control the wealth of the entire world.

Gore accuses FOX News, for having the gall to present conservative views to its huge audience. Might one suggest that MSNBC (indeed, the entire Cabalist, if not the entire lamestream media) serves to fulfill the imagined FOX role, but for progressives? 

Let me get this straight:  Right-wingers have been trying to “push” their agenda onto everyone for years?  Who’s been PUSHING, no, RAMMING, their agenda down EVERYONE’S throat, against the will of the majority of THE PEOPLE, for the past three years? 

TARP, STIMULUS, OBAMACARE, REJECTING A BALANCED BUDGET? 

Polls clearly show that most people in this country OPPOSED EVERY ONE OF THESE ITEMS. 

Their behavior flies in the face of the very “democracy” they pretend to embrace.  They want democracy ONLY when the people vote the way that progressives want them to vote.  Otherwise, the people are a dangerous mob of terrorists.

When they speak, it’s free speech. When their opponents speak, it’s dangerous speech that must be suppressed.

When Soros gives money, it’s democracy and Soros is a benefactor who wants everything that’s right and good. When the Kochs give money, it’s dangerous infiltration and corruption, in an attempt to push an evil agenda onto an unsuspecting populace.

When Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, among others like Maureen Dowd, rabidly attack “right-wing” policies, Tea Partiers, and conservatives, it’s a wonderful example of freedom of the press.  When some opinion programs on FOX give equal time to or support conservatives, the Tea Party, or Republican politicians, that network becomes dangerous to “democracy” and should be silenced for the greater good, by any means necessary.

Yadda, yadda, yadda. 

Doesn’t Gore–a millionaire if not a billionaire via his vast connections to power– comprehend how ridiculous it is for him to try to CREATE a bogus grassroots movement, while at the same time criticizing the Rick Santelli-inspired Tea Party for being astroturfed?

Happy Faux Birthday, Mr. President.