Birthers R Crazy or R They?

© Red Pill WTPOTUS 2011

An article by John Ellis, “Birther Issue Goes Mainstream” reveals that “journalists” today must include the word birther in their copy to generate internet hits to their articles. They are walking a tightrope in how they use the term because they don’t want to alienate their JournOlistic comrades,

all of whom in New York-Washington media circles are resolute in their belief that “birthers” are insane!

One JournOlisted writer, Dave Weigel, fired by the The Washington Independent, posed as a conservative writer and bashed anyone that opposed Obama.   Weigel continues his attacks while employed by Slate as a liberal columnist.    This JournOlister labels those who want Obama to prove his eligibility as “birthers” who are “insane”.  Rather than investigating the issue that might qualify him to hold the title “journalist,” he derides and denigrates anyone  questioning the validity of Obama’s adherence to the Constitution’s Article 2 Section 1 requirement that the president must be a “natural born citizen.” 

To Weigel and all those leftist JournOlist members, who use the same tired and overused Alinsky marginalizing tactics, we say,

Go ahead, call us crazy.

We say it’s crazy that not a single member of Congress ever inspected a hard copy birth certificate for the pResident and Vice-President.

We say it’s crazy that not a single member of Congress ever questioned whether a son who admitted he was born a British subject because his father was a British subject (and never a U.S. citizen) can be considered a “natural born citizen” of the United States.

We say it’s crazy that the Senate debated whether or not John McCain is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, but they were too timid to debate the same issue with respect to Barry Soetoro (a.k.a Barack Obama).

We say it’s crazy for them to think that this issue will go away if they continue to mock and label those who support and defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law as “birthers.”

President Ronald Reagan was famous for repeatedly quoting an old Russian maxim:

“Доверяй, но проверяй … Trust, but Verify.”

If one mocks verification, then they are mocking Ronald Reagan.

Regardless of your party affiliation (or lack thereof), supporting and defending the Constitution and the Rule of Law makes one a “Constitutional Republican(*)” NOT  a “birther.”

(*) A Republic is ruled by the Rule of Law.  A Democracy is ruled by the Rule of the majority.  The United States of America is a Constitutional Republic, where our representatives are elected democratically, but we are a Republic, not a Democracy.

For all of those who support and defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law, take note that when one combines the legal requirements of:

1) Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution

2) Section 3 of the 20th Amendment to the United States Constitution

3) The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986:

All employees, citizens and noncitizens, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States must complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.

… one sees that Obama and Biden are legally required to produce hard copy documentation of not only their eligibility to work in the United states but also their eligibility to hold the office of President.

And Congress has the legal responsibility to ensure that the President and Vice President have qualified.

Constitutional Republicans (again, regardless of party affiliation) expect those who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law to ACTUALLY DO SO.

Yes, call us crazy because we want to maintain the integrity of the Constitutional framework!

Go Ahead, Call Us Verifiably Crazy!

57 responses to “Birthers R Crazy or R They?

  1. Why aren’t the “birther” lawyers using this law? Pelt Taitz, Leo Donofrio, Pkil Berg, Mario Apuzzo, Alan Keyes. This is pretty straightforward.

  2. Bobbi…it has become evident that “we the people” do not have a sovereign goverment. Our country is controlled by others and our elected officials are puppets. Lawyers are impotent when laws have no authority.

    • Watchingtheweasels

      Right you are TDR. The instances where laws are simply changed or – in the words of AG Holder – “not enforced” are getting more numerous by the day. As George Orwell wrote, “All animals are equal…but some are more equal than others.” We are decades past a time when a citizen could expect justice out of the American legal system.

      • Another example of them not enforcing rules equally: They’re going after that KV Pharmaceutical because they won the exclusive right to market a drug, yet the regulators don’t like what they say they must charge to recoup expenses. So the regulators say they won’t enforce their exclusive rights to that drug, meaning they’ll let others market possibly inferior generics, even when their own rules say they should protect KV.

        While some might argue (convincingly) that the drug is overpriced, KV offered large discounts for those who can’t afford the drugt, KV has been undergoing severe financial distress and this new drug offered a chance to save the company and MANY jobs, and it certainly seems unfair to simply IGNORE the rules arbitrarily and without due process.

        In the case of “orphan drugs”, if the FDA has this power to disparately ignore the rules and dictate to companies what the drugs should cost, then WHY should drug makers EVER bother to do the research and development involved in bringing such drugs to the market?

        This is where their “compassion” falls short. To help unnamed “victims” who might not be able to afford this drug at that price, despite programs to help those people, they take steps in kneejerk fashion, ideologically, and in the end the unintended consequences of their supposedly well-intentioned actions HARM many more innocents–like the people at KV who will lose their jobs and the many people who may die from or have to live with terrible illnesses that might have been cured, IF drug companies weren’t afraid that the FDA would interfere in their need to recoup development costs.

  3. Sharon has out done herself with this letter. This is a MUST READ!
    Her letter should be copied and sent to everyone. Let FOX feel some heat!

    Open Letter to Roger Ailes, President of Fox News Channel

    (Mar. 30, 2011) — The following letter will be sent to Mr. Roger Ailes, President of Fox News Channel and Chairman of Fox Television Stations Group:

    Despite your leadership of the “profit engine” of News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch and a recipient of $23,000,000 in salary and bonuses last year, you have failed the American public by refusing to report the questions regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States.

    One of your recommendations for success is for your staff to “read the U.S. Constitution.” When is the last time you read Article II, Section 1, clause 5, which states:

    You allowed a man who has hidden his past completely from the American public to gain a place on the ballot in every state and to actually be elected president without one scrap of evidence that he was constitutionally eligible.

    None of your reporters ever performed any in-depth questioning of Obama during the campaign nor gained access to his background.

    Several months ago, Fr. Jonathan Morris made the statement on Fox & Friends Weekend that Obama was “born in a Muslim country, Kenya,” after which the three anchors nervously and vehemently denied it. Rather than asking how Fr. Morris obtain his information, they tried to quell any curiosity about it and correct the record as quickly as they could to state that Obama was born “in this country.”

  4. Will Trump be silenced like everyone else? Is that why they hired him? He will receive no compensation. Newt left to campaign and so did another — Former Sen. Rick Santorum so they needed a voice.

    He’s hired: Donald Trump to join ‘Fox and Friends’ on Mondays

    The ‘birther’ issue seems unlikely to vanish as a Republican talking point anytime soon now that Donald Trump has been hired to hold forth on ‘Fox and Friends’ each week

    Lately, Trump has been loud and clear on the you-can’t-kill-it-no-matter-how-hard-you-try matter of President Obama’s origins, producing his own birth certificate and daring the president to do the same.

    He nearly sent Fox News talker Bill O’Reilly into orbit in an appearance earlier this week on the issue, which O’Reilly called a conspiracy that has been thoroughly debunked.,0,1944277.story

    • “thoroughly debunked!” ROFLOL!!!! Those guys. What cards!

      • Was it really? So it is a lie? I fell for it hook, line and sinker! Should I remove it? It didn’t say satire or did I miss it?

        • I was quoting the latimes story that said that O’Reilly declared the birth certificate “conspiracy” as “thoroughly debunked. ” In their dreams.

  5. This guy has all the Left’s Talking points. Read so you know what to expect. The bots are out in full force. Media matters has 86 of them!

    Birthers Hijacking Debate May Be Boon for Obama
    By Albert R. Hunt – Apr 3, 2011 9:01 AM CT Snips

    Claims by the so-called birther movement that the 44th president wasn’t born in America and that his worldview was shaped by a Kenyan heritage are no longer the province of the nutty fringe and are being cited by some leading conservatives.

    It appears more than coincidence that Obama also is the first African-American president. These charges and issues are centered on the notion of his otherness, that he’s not a “real American.”

    “This appears to be a surrogate for the racial fringe,” says Fred Greenstein, a prominent presidential historian and emeritus professor of politics at Princeton University. Birther or Kenyan influence may sound more palatable than “racial epithets,” he notes.

    In what is intended as a slap at Obama, Republican legislators in a dozen states are offering “birther” amendments requiring political candidates to present bona fide birth certificates.

    1961 Plot -For this to amount to a conspiracy, as the birthers charge, would entail a diabolical plot hatched in 1961 that includes faux baby announcements. [here’s that plot they try to push from 1961 rather than it being manufactured especially for Obama.]

    • Did Albert write this piece just for Mayor Bloomberg? They are pulling in the big guns now.. Albert R. Hunt is the executive editor for Washington at Bloomberg News. The opinions expressed are his own, he says. The Left is on fire!

      Ohhhh… Albert, we are nutty fringe! But I don’t think we have been called “racial fringe” before. We must add those combined adjectives to our profiles. Those eligibility laws for states are now being called ” Birther amendments,” I was wondering what to call them.

      • Fringe ?…When I think of fringe I think of the bedspread on my Grandmother’s bed. So much for fringe…Their words are so lame.

      • The Hawaiian Birth always refers back to the announcement in the paper. Has anyone physically held the newspaper with that birth announcement, or is it just the microfiche?

        Two weeks ago my daughter needed her Certificate of Live Birth (from a Chicago hospital) to apply for her passport. In the envelope with her Certificate was her actual birth announcement from the newspaper. I cut it out and saved it for her (thinking that one day I would actually finish her baby book!)

        Has anyone ever tracked down anyone else, whose name was also listed that day, to see if they saved that paper? It’s just something a mom does for their baby’s book.

        • It’s microfilm and those who have actually SEEN the films say they look tampered with and that they don’t match what’s online, as if the copies weren’t made from those films, yet the people who offered the images online claim that they were made from those films. Hmmm. Curious, huh?

      • They must really be worried, as they should be.

  6. Great post, Red Pill and Bridgette.

    Weigel is back? What an asshat. The major Barry defender extraordinaire. What a weasel–even his name sounds like that. Dave Weasel. And remember! Weasel is the asshat who coined the perjorative–that banned b-word which will not be typed, at least not by me.

    In ridiculing us, Weasel ironically writes, “They start with the belief that Obama cannot be eligible for the presidency. They trust evidence they find online.”

    ROFLOL. Uh, Dave, where is the ONLY place that ANY “journalist” or “journolister” for that matter has ever found Barry’s elusive supposed birth certificate? ONLINE, YOU ASSHAT. So by your own criteria, you’re an idiot.

    Here’s an interesting paragraph by Weasel, in which he tries to explain why the issue remains:
    “The standard answer is this: because Barack Obama won’t release proof of his citizenship. Sorry, no dice: He did release proof of his citizenship, in June 2008—and it helped birtherism go mainstream.”

    NO, DAVE, he did NOT. And nobody’s asking for his “proof of citizenship.” We’re asking for his proof of NATURAL BORN citizenship, you asshat, as you WELL KNOW, so stop moving the goal post.

    And stop trying to cloud the issue, in genuine Alinsky style. LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE, CERTIFIED BY THE STATE OF HAWAII, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. That’s what we want.


    Isn’t it also ironic that all the journolister Barry bum kissers like Weasel ridicule Trump for his ego and for bragging that he went to the best college and is a smart guy. HAS WEASEL PERHAPS GLANCED THROUGH BARRY’S TWO SELF-AGGRANDIZING AUTOBIOGRAPHIES? Barry sets the new standard for narcissism and egotism. By that standard, Trump is humility personified.

    Weasel writes, “Another theory says Obama can’t be president because his father was Kenyan and that made his son a British citizen by default. (This theory would disqualify Trump, whose mother was Scottish.)”

    So there you see how little Weasel knows of his topic, unless (oh, this cannot be, can it?) Weasel deliberately lies and misleads his readers. An Alinsky acolyte would NEVER do such a thing, would he? BHO Sr. was NEVER a US Citizen. He never intended to immigrate to the US. He was a temporary resident, as a student. He was not an immigrant. He never naturalized. He was a foreign citizen when Barry was born, if Barry is even his son, which is in dispute. Trump’s mother, however, was a naturalized US CITIZEN upon Trump’s birth, therefore, by every definition out there, Trump is a NATURAL BORN US CITIZEN. OBAMA IS NOT.

    Weasel has written this piece in order to get the rest of the journolist troops back in line. They’re falling for Trump’s well laid trap and Weasel is upset, so he’s trying to force them to never again ask any candidate whether or not he or she thinks Barry is eligible because Weasel realizes that the story HAS FREAKING LEGS AND IS GETTING TRACTION. Once it becomes part of the collective consciousness, as a writer at American Thinker alluded to, it’s there. It’s present. People will remember. More and more people will ask, WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

    Ellis, however, is correct in his analysis. His theory is exactly right: Trump gives the lamestream and even the guys at FOX a reason to discuss the issue. They’re not talking about the issue except in connection with Trump. They’re covering Trump who’s talking about the birth certificate. Each for his or her own reason. Some for ratings and “hits”. It does get them viewers, readers, listeners. Why? Because, despite what they want everyone to believe and despite what they try hard to convince themselves to believe, We the PEOPLE believe that Obama has not proved his eligibility. WHY? Because HE HASN’T.

    As for guys like Hannity, they’ve probably been waiting for an excuse to raise the issue, given that order from above not to talk about the BC on their own. Now Trump has given them an excuse to talk about it. That’s the beauty and genius of Trump. He’s using the lamestream’s faults against them. Game, set, match.


    That’s an interesting article about Barry’s bogus identity, with information from a former IRS tax examiner, who gives illumination into how people create fake identities. My quibble with him, as always with a lot of bloggers, is that he says things as fact with no supporting evidence. For example, he says Barry didn’t start using the name Obama until after he came back from Pakistan. While that may be true, where’s the evidence that is IS true? He says the public knows that Barry graduated from Punahou as Barry Soetoro and the same for Occidental. We do? If we do know that, then upon what basis do we “know” that? We may SUSPECT that, which explains why he hides his records; but we don’t “know” it.

  8. COLB Image Removed from Website

    Apr. 3, 2011) — It has been reported that the image of Obama’s purported Certification of Live Birth has been removed or is otherwise unavailable from the website of as of April 3, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. EDT.

    The image still appears on Obama’s “Fight the Smears” website from 2008. Under the image there is a submission with Factcheck’s logo which reads:….

    • They can’ t scrub this one away..there are too many copies out there. They are using the meme that Opponents believe he is not a “citizen” note not Natural Born Citizen.

  9. Trump needs to armed with these “FACTS” instead of shooting from the hip as he is now doing. Trump is courting disaster (unfortunately for the whole movement) unless he is educated and armed with “Facts like these”.

  10. Friends, Americans, countrymen,

    This Birth Certificate thing, which is near and dear to my heart, is also about the biggest damn red herring ever dragged across the trail of a fleeing suspect, ever. I would, like everyone else, love to see it.

    However, if I could prove that BO/BS were to have been born at home plate, in Yankee Stadium, in the 5th inning of a double-header, on the 4th of July, with Joe Dimaggio in the stands, and the Marine Band playing the “Star Spangled Banner, ” it still would not make him a “Natural Born Citizen,” even with everyone in the stands as witnesses. It is reported in Bill Ayers’ outstanding historical novel, “Dreams of my Father,” supposedly modeled on BO/BS’ life, that the hero’s papa, was some sort of African British Subject.

    The Birth Certificate is important in another way, though. In Hollister v. Soetoro Lawyer Hemenway points out rather forcefully that when the boy Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. (or II) was adopted by Lolo Soetoro, his name would have been legally changed. Therefore, the mystical original long form BC would have been sealed, and a new, amended BC would have been issued in the child’s new name. So, to make a long story interminable, there no longer is a legal person known as “Barack Hussein Obama, Jr (or II).” That’s because ole “Whatsisname” never went to court to legally change it back.

    And that, says Lawyer Hemenway, is what this whole BC thing is about.
    BO/BS has taken the oat h of office and signed documents of state using a name not legally his. This may also explain why BO/BS lied on his Illinois Bar Application telling the Bar committee that he had never used an alias, or other name! (He also told them he had never used drugs and had no outstanding traffic infractions) Not to worry, he “voluntarily” resigned from the Bar and the records are sealed.

    I recommend that Donald Trump keep up the Birth Certificate drama, but that he read up on disbarrment and “Natural Born Citizen,” on this very site!

    Regards to all in BO/BS Land

  11. Look – Without the Birth Certificate we don’t know ANYTHING about Obama.
    WE Don’t know who his FATHER IS?
    WE Don’t know who his MOTHER IS?
    WE Don’t even know who Obama IS?
    We Don’t know If his Father is A US CITIZEN or a FOREIGNER?
    We Don’t know If his Mother is A US CITIZEN or a FOREIGNER?
    We Don’t know If OBAMA is A US CITIZEN or a FOREIGNER?
    We Don’t know DIDDLY about OBAMA without the Birth Certificate (and other documentation).
    To say the Birth Certificate is “Irrelevant” is RIDICULOUS!!! and shows a lack of thinking and a great deal of Gullibility in Swallowing the BS that he put in his book or that was printed in some newspaper. WE KNOW NOTHING WITHOUT DOCUMENTATION or VALIDATED proof!!

    • I am beginning to be convinced that BHO Sr. had a lot of children because his stepmother took in orphans. I was reading something about adoptions on Free Republic yesterday. A bunch of legalese but something jumped out at me: In certain countries, an adopted child CANNOT inherit. Remember how Barry wasn’t eligible to inherit? Only Mark was? I also wonder if Mark and the others were adopted by Ruth. Not birthed by Ruth, I mean. Do you see any resemblance between Mark and his mother?

      You’re correct, ELmo: We can’t say the BC is irrelevant because he was a British subject, because that is predicated upon BHO Sr. being his father, which we don’t know. It’s a circular argument, just like with the birth announcements referring to this POTUS. THAT’S possibly a reference to his birth (“son”) IF BHO Sr. IS his father and we don’t know that for sure, do we? There is NO evidence whatsoever that he is who he says he is. We don’t know WHO he is. In fact, I wrote a post about that very subject. In addition, Barry NEVER himself said he’s a British subject. An arm of his campaign said it, but campaigns say things all the time that are not true. He always maintains six degrees of separation from EVERY claim that’s made. Even his own so-called autobiography contains a caveat warning every reader that it’s FANTASY.

      What it truly is is taqiyya.

  12. Whose Social Security Number Did Obama Steal?

    See update – photo of Selective Service information with fake SS#

  13. Birthers, Bush bashers cut from the same misguided cloth
    Jay Ambrose / Scripps Howard News Service
    April 05. 2011 1:00AM
    Commentary [of Ignorance! One wonders where he got his facts! Talking Points 101 for Leftists! ]

    Donald Trump, real estate entrepreneur, television host and possible presidential hopeful, went on TV’s “The View” recently, babbling that he was a birther and making no sense at all in his arguments. He thereby put a nationally witnessed exclamation mark behind the claim that believers in President Barack Obama’s foreign birth are stupid.

    For further televised birther-debunking, this time intentional, one could also tune into Jon Stewart’s show. The comedian interviewed a “conservative” computer that blew a gasket in its confused insistence that Obama is not an American citizen. Clever or no? Well, no, and although many do laugh along with the talented Stewart, here’s the thing: There is nothing nearly as indefensible about at least one matter raised by birthers as there is about the inanities widely circulated about President George W. Bush.

    Obama is an American

    Many birthers make the inexcusable blunder of saying Obama was born in Kenya.

    We know he wasn’t because of birth announcements in two Hawaii newspapers and an official certification of birth from the Hawaii Health Department.

    Obama is a native-born citizen legally entitled to sit as president. Period.

    And yet we have never had a release of an original long-form birth certificate, as has been reported by such news organizations as the Associated Press and the New York Times. This document includes more information than the short form — seemingly innocuous stuff, such as more details about the parents.

    To finally quell conspiracy theorizing, Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie, an Obama friend, figured on making the document public. He needed Obama’s approval, but the president said no.

    Is there something embarrassing in the document? It’s hard to imagine what it could be, but wondering why the president wouldn’t take a couple of minutes to rob birthers of the last iota of credibility is not so dimwitted as leftists promoting all kinds of nonsense about Bush, such as the allegation he stole the 2000 election.–Bush-bashers-cut-from-the-same-misguided-cloth#ixzz1Iejd7rAt

    • Leftist Talking Points for Dummies..Jay has it down pat! NATIVE BORN JAY…native born is the key! Next time do read the CONSTITUTION instead of relying on John Podesta or Media Matters. Eligibility requires being a NATURAL BORN citizen.

      Your credibility shows you are the one that is dimwitted and stupid as you try to promote all kinds of nonsense.–Bush-bashers-cut-from-the-same-misguided-cloth

    • Typical Alinsky tactics. Recharacterized the issue. Turn NATURAL BORN into “American” or “citizen” or “native citizen.” Answer the wrong question. Lie, mislead, prevaricate, obfuscate, personally attack the opponent. People who resort to these tactics do so because they have no other alternative. They cannot argue the issue because the facts are clear.

      This is a new tactic: Pretend to be unbiased. Appeal to those who were angered by the unfair, false allegations about Bush stealing the 2000 election. Then set that next to Barry’s ineligibility AS IF they’re equally FALSE, when they’re not and he knows it.

      Bush did NOT steal the election and this was proved by the very progressive asshats in the lamestream media.

      However, Barry IS ineligible, a topic which the same very progressive asshats in the lamestream media DELIBERATELY REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE.

      If this guy is so puzzled by Barry’s refusal to produce the BC, then WHY doesn’t he and all the others in the lamestream who similarly wonder ASK BARRY WHY HE WON’T PRODUCE IT? Can you imagine them not asking Bush, if the shoe were on the other foot? Pshaw!

      At least he admits to this FACT: “we have never had a release of an original long-form birth certificate.” What’s confusing about this sentence is this phrase: “as has been reported by such news organizations,” yadda, yadda, yadda.

      Does he mean that news organizations FALSELY reported that a long-form was released or that they reported, truthfully, that it has never been released?

      He writes, “It’s hard to imagine what” might be embarrassing on a long-form. LOL. It’s not hard for us to imagine. These people truly suffer from a lack of imagination or a deliberate “see no evil” syndrome. They are so enamored of their emperor that they think he’s clothed when he’s naked as the proverbial jaybird. (What a mental image. Yuk. Sorry.)

      He also reports this FACT: Abercrombie wanted to release the bc, but: “He needed Obama’s approval, but the president said no.” WHY did he say NO?

    • The package contained a pig’s foot and a note laced with several anti-Semitic references, according to a person with knowledge of the incident who requested anonymity because of the ongoing police investigation. King is Catholic.

      • Jamie Allman, a radio talk show host and former reporter, said today that the package contained a note that said, “you can kiss my black Muslim a**.” He said this isn’t being reported and that liberal bloggers are laughing about it. What a lark! Isn’t that funny? But, he said, if this were a liberal who received the pig’s foot, it would be front page news and they’d be screaming about right-wing domestic terrorism.

        While it’s not proved that the sender WAS a black Muslim, it’s as likely to be true as not. On the other hand, somebody could be punking by trying to mislead investigators. It occurs to me to wonder if Muslims would touch a pig’s foot? Maybe in the interest of jihad, though, they might put aside their fear of contamination.

        Curious. Can’t wait to see if they ever find out who sent the thing. But if they do, will they tell us?

    • h/t to Ms Sharon !

      • It has been reported that the image of Obama’s purported Certification of Live Birth has been removed or is otherwise unavailable from the website of as of April 3, 2011, at 1:00 p.m. EDT.

        Well how about that ?

        Clean up on Isle 4 please !

    • Yeah. I’m still pondering that one. It was, indeed, disappeared or else the image was moved for some reason and they didn’t update the story with the new link.

      Given butterdezillion’s finds about the sources of those online birth announcement images, I wonder, wonder, wonder if FactCheck forgot to disappear the “properties” of that one particular image. Upon realizing that fact, maybe they took it down until they “fixed” the problem.

      I’m not familiar with exif data, but I do recall that when they first posted all the photographs of the bogus COLB, which THEY claimed they personally took in Chicago, after people started examining the exif data (learning that the photos were taken only days before the final passport breach, in March, not August, 2008), FactCheck took all the photos down. And then replaced them with images with poorer resolution and NO exif data, so nobody could do any further analysis.

      So I ask you: Would a reputable “fact checking” organization do such a thing? That action might be called an indication of possible “consciousness of guilt” and/or possible “fabrication or suppression by a third party.” Note that I said POSSIBLE. However, what would be an alternative explanation for doing that at that particular point in time?

  14. The Undeclared War. News, Pictures, and Maps from the front lines.
    If anyone has any doubts that America is in danger of losing this war to the “Failed State” of Mexico and other SA countries (and by extension the Middle East) they should view these maps and pictures. All the while, keep this thought in mind **Only approx. (mid range) 15% of our border to the south is patrolled.**

    Click to access DPS%20Spillover%20Crime%20Cartels%20Report.pdf

  15. Dr.Alan Keyes Speaks About Obama’s Eligibility Question
    Solomon Show Live
    Discussion about Obama’s Eligibility and his use of a Social Security Number reserved for Connecticut Applicants.

  16. H/T jonrick46

  17. Excellent Articles! Thanks!

  18. Donald Trump doesn’t give a damn

    But Trump clearly doesn’t give a damn what polite society thinks of his presidential prospects.

    While former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels work assiduously to be seen as serious challengers to Obama, Trump keeps doubling down on the birther controversy and spitting out policy prescriptions that would horrify most Washington strategists.

    I called Trump last Friday to see if he would back off his claim that the president of the United States might be constitutionally prohibited from holding his office.

    “I’m not finished with that issue by any stretch of the imagination,” Trump told me. “You mock me for that, but his own grandmother says he was born in Kenya and says she was there.”

    The New York real estate mogul didn’t stop with questions about the birth certificate. Trump also claimed the president’s first book was ghostwritten by a domestic terrorist.

    “Bill Ayers wrote ‘Dreams From My Father,’” Trump told me. “I have no doubt about it. That first book was total genius and helped get him elected. But you can tell Obama did the second book himself because it read like it was written by somebody of average intelligence with a high school education.”

    For Trump, the theory feeds into his belief that Obama is unfit to be president.

    “He is the most overrated guy. It’s unbelievable. Obama is worse than Jimmy Carter, and I put Carter at the head of the pack for bad presidents.”

    H/T Papoose

  19. Hawaii senator wonders what Obama’s concealing
    ‘Why would anyone spend millions not to make that information public?’

    April 05, 2011

    The lone Republican in the Hawaii State Senate was interviewed on the radio this morning, explaining that while he believes Barack Obama was born in the Aloha State, he questions what might be on the original, long-form birth certificate that would prompt the president to go to such lengths to conceal it.

    “I’m not a ‘birther,'” Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom told Jeff Katz of WXKS Radio in Boston, “and I followed this from the very beginning.

    At first I followed it with amusement, and then I got really concerned about it, because the question was if it was not just the birth certificate, but other records as well – school records, academic records, work records – why would anyone spend millions of dollars in legal fees, particularly someone in public office, particularly someone in the highest public office, to not make that information public?”

    “There are different theories,” Slom continued. “One is that there is no birth certificate at all; I don’t think that’s true, I think there is a birth certificate. The second is there may be some very interesting information that the president does not want released, for example, who his father really is or what’s listed on the birth certificate.

    “In any event, here is the president of the United States,” Slom said, “you’ve got to have [a birth certificate to present], why don’t we require that of the president?”

  20. Thanks! Keep up the good work!


    Hillary had all of this info 3 years ago. Trump’s is just revealing what Hillary’s investigators had 3 or more years ago, but more power to him for raising the issue. Now that Trump showed up in second place in one poll in NH maybe more Repubs will make strong demands that bo show his BC.

  22. We need to all keep the faith until members of Congress begin supporting and defending Article II Section 1, Section 3 of the 20th Amendment, and the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

    Step 1 is verifying the “Obama birth narrative”… seeing the original, certified, hard copy vital records to determine the truth of Soetoro/Obama’s birth.

    Step 2 is reacting to the outcome of that verification…

    If the “Obama birth narrative” is 100% true, then he is a usurper because he does not meet the Natural Law Definition of “Natural Born Citizen”. A usurper should be immediately removed from office, all of the usurped actions (including Obamacare and judicial nominations) voided and stricken from the record, and the usurper sent to Gitmo .

    If the “Obama birth narrative” is not 100% true, then he is guilty of forgery, perjury, obstruction of justice, etc., so even if he is a natural born citizen of the United States, he would still be guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors, and should be impeached, convicted, removed from office, and sent to Gitmo.

  23. The former Hawaii elections official who maintains there’s no long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama in the Aloha State is now saying the president and his aides have been “caught fibbing” about Obama’s background, and the “embarrassing” situation is making it difficult to fess up to the truth.

    Tim Adams, who was senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu during the 2008 campaign, made the statements in a two-hour interview with a group looking to disprove claims made by so-called birthers, those challenging Obama’s legal qualification to be president.

    “I think people believe there’s been some kind of cover-up. And I don’t think it’s some big nefarious conspiracy. I think it’s politics as usual,” Adams said March 31 on Reality Check Radio, an Internet program on BlogTalkRadio.

    “Barack Obama’s official autobiography was put out to the public for the public’s consumption and we all know politicians – they have a public persona, it’s created for consumption by the electorate – and I think that they’ve been caught fibbing, and it’s embarrassing.”

    But Adams, who described himself as “pretty much a liberal” who backed Hillary Clinton in the campaign, thinks the president should produce a long-form birth certificate if he has one, even if it contains information that does not go along with the narrative proffered so far by Obama and his surrogates.

    Read more: Hawaii elections clerk: Obama ‘caught fibbing’

  24. Now the obots are attacking TV Hosts who don’t attack birthers.

    As reports that Meredith Vieira is planning an exit from NBC’s “Today Show” swirl, the anchor has sparked controversy over her failure to question a number of unsubstantiated challenges to the U.S. citizenship of President Barack Obama that Donald Trump floated in an interview with Vieira this morning.


    Donald Trump’s Birther Talk Drives His GOP 2012 Support Up

    I noted yesterday that a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found that self-promoter and real estate developer Donald Trump has risen to second place among GOP 2012 primary voters. I suggested that while part of this is no doubt a function of name recognition, his rise is also more evidence that the birther movement has grown to become a not insignificant portion of the Republican Party. Trump’s presidential musings have gained media traction in recent weeks, after all, almost solely based on his discovery of the conspiracy theory that President Obama was born abroad.

  26. To:

    Sent: Friday, April 8, 2011 9:26 AM


    Now what part of Vattel’s clear and concise Definition of a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN do Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Democrats not understand?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s