Whose Social Security Number Did Obama Steal?

© Bridgette WTPOTUS 2011

The Tip of the Iceberg!

Obama’s Social Security Number from Connecticut?

The engine that could just keeps keepin’ on!  That mighty engine is Attorney Orly Taitz.    Against all odds, and multiple roadblocks, she moves ahead in her quest for truth and exposure of Obama’s ineligibility. Orly received  a page of hard to read information  instead of a  legible numident from her FOIA request regarding Thomas Louis Wood whose social security number is one less than Obama’s.

Thomas died at age 19 and the information was available to the public, yet  it has taken over a year for the Social Security Administration (SSA)  to release the information.  Why did they stonewall her request?  Orly had to file a lawsuit to have the information released.  Finally,  the original application arrived along with a letter from the SSA.   She has  posted these to her site.  The first photo below is what the SSA initially sent to Orly.   Thereafter, are the new numidents for Thomas who was a resident of New Britain, CT…a state and place that Obama never lived.   So how did Obama get a social security card from that state?

From these forms, she states they can pinpoint the date  when the  SS-5 was filled out for Obama’s CONNECTICUT Social Security Number 042-68-4425 that he started using around 1980. Obama’s number is one number after deceased Thomas Louis Wood’s number that ends in 4424.

The application date for Obama would be between March – April, 1977 when Barack Obama states he was in Hawaii and nowhere near Connecticut.

Following are copies of the information for Thomas Louis Wood who died an early death. Yet his death is providing information that shows when Obama’s apparent identity theft of a social security number occurred, or when someone got the number for him.

Click to enlarge these forms for viewing.

Numident - The first version received from the SSA with redacted information

SSA's Certification Letter for Thomas Louis Wood's information

Thomas Wood Application for Connecticut Social Security Number - Numident

It is interesting to note on the 1977 application above the government asks for “Your Color or Race.”   The choices were “White, Negro, Other.”   There was no designation, “African.”   (Of course I am referring to the forged internet version of  the Certification of Live Birth that Obama put online where they used the term “African”  for the designation of race.  We all know that the term  means a nationality, and is  not a race.)

The above shows that Thomas’ mother applied for his Social Security Number on March 21, 1977  when he was 14 years old, and the number given to him was 041-68-4424.    In logical sequence the next person would be issued the next number.  Who really owns  Social Security Number 042-68-4425?   If this number was issued in 1977, what number did Obama use when he was allegedly working at Baskin Robbins in Oahu, Hawaii in 1975?

Thomas Wood - Numident - Dated 3/28/77

Thomas Wood Numident Dated 4-15-77

Why are there two different Numidents issued 18 days apart?   The first is a day after the  date of application.   The second was prepared  18 days later.

In my own research,  I used the LDS Genealogy site.   Their Social Security Death Index lists Thomas Wood as born in 1962 and dying in 1981. The SS# is the same number as indicated.  His social security number 042-68-4424  is still listed as belonging to him.  It has not been reassigned.

Social Security Death Index

Thomas WOOD
Birth Date:     15 Jul 1962
Death Date:      Jul 1981
Social Security Number:  042-68-4424
State or Territory Where Number Was Issued:  Connecticut

ZIP Code:     06111
Death Residence Localities
Localities: Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut
Hfd, Hartford, Connecticut
Htfd, Hartford, Connecticut
Maple Hill, Hartford, Connecticut
Newington, Hartford, Connecticut

Another search by social security number on  Genealogy Bank produced  Thomas Wood’s name.  The search for numbers preceding Thomas produced no results nor were there any results for numbers after Thomas.  In other words, the people that own those numbers have not died.

042-68-4423  none
042-68-4424  Thomas Wood
042-68-4425  none –  The number Obama uses
042-68-4426  none
042-68-4427  none

If you remember there were two different investigators that researched Obama’s use of different social security numbers for Orly.  Both Susan Daniels, an Ohio licensed private investigator and  John N. Sampson, a Colorado private investigator signed affidavits of their findings in an eligibility lawsuit.   In a statement to WND,  Ms. Daniels said, “There is obviously a case of fraud going on here.”   She said, I am “staking my reputation on a conclusion that Obama’s use of this Social Security number is fraudulent.”

WND reported that  even more suspicious  is that the databases that the investigators used showed ” the date 1890  indicating the year of  birth of the number holder, along with Obama’s birth date of 08/04/1961.    A third date listed is 04/08/1961, which appears to be a transposition of Obama’s birth date in an international format, with the day before the month.”  How can this be if the Social Security Administration never reissues social security numbers?  Why would there be different information in different databases, unless someone was scrubbing and changing it?   Who had access to the databases?

The real owner of the number that Obama confiscated may still be living. Is there an individual that is 121 years old today? It is interesting that the number hasn’t been recorded by the SSA as a death.   So who issued Obama the number and buried the real owners name?

So We The People:  We have a fraudulent and forged Certification of Live Birth for Obama, a forged or fraudulent Selective Service record,  birth announcements that aren’t duplicated anywhere else in the US in any library,  inserted pages into a  birth index in Hawaii,  hospitals that don’t claim him,  falsified documents by the Democratic Party, a  State record stating that Obama is a natural born citizen, photo-shopped family and self  photos,  professors stating they never saw him at Columbia University,  a phony book that was written by Bill Ayers, no living “real”  blood relatives, no records from his Illinois Senate days, no medical records, and multitudes of sealed records.    How many of your friends have no documented background?   Are they in witness protection?

What else could we think other than this is a man whose ideology is foreign because he is foreign.  He can’t relate to us because he isn’t one of us.  Anyone that can’t produce a simple document has lots to hide.  He said it himself.   But when there are multitudes of the same document associated with his name…we have a conman, a thief, and a liar.   How many social security numbers do you have?    Obama has no less than  four dozen!

Oh,  this is  one report that we do have.  This was previously located by another investigator for Orly and  was reported in “Obama’s Lying Blue Lips.”This report was from another government database, “Intelligator”.    I guess they missed this one when they were scrubbing passport records,  manufacturing selective service records,  doctoring college records, and inventing  and creating a family history that has so many holes, it reeks like Limburger Cheese. 

Background Report 11/16/2009
Barack Obama   STATE IL
Barack H. Obama
5046 S. Greenwood Ave. Chicago IL 60615
County: Cook
DOB: 08-01-1961 Age 48      Not August 4, 1961
Gender M
Education: Graduate School
Occupation Group: Professional/Technical
Occupation: Unknown
Ethnic Code: Equatorial Guinea
Ethnic Group F
Language Code E
Possible Relatives MICHELLE OBAMA age 45

We are talking multiple criminal charges. Who will investigate the Fraud in the White House? What are they waiting for?  What more do they need to do their jobs? How many citizen requests do they need?

Does Congress know that  “Undocumented, alien, illegal”  workers purchase and use fake social security cards?   Tell Obama to Prove his Eligibility and produce the documents to Prove it! He won’t because he can’t!

Thanks to the “Engine that Could” for her perseverance and tenacity in locating and fighting for  the truth!

UPDATE:

Selective Service - Full Document - Orly

Selective Service – Orly
Advertisements

157 responses to “Whose Social Security Number Did Obama Steal?

  1. Excellent research and analysis, Bridgette. Hats off to Orly, too.

    Just a day or so ago, I was reading somewhere about this subject, which is suddenly in the “news” on blogs.

    I read a novel (at least to me) theory put forth by obots: Barry’s FATHER who was living in Connecticut at the time applied for the SS# for him, which is why Barry got a number from Connecticut, even though he never lived there.

    Putting aside the ridiculousness of this tale–

    WAS BHO Sr. in Connecticut circa 1977? I don’t think so.

    WHY would Barry, who’s living in Hawaii with his grandparents, have his father apply for his SS# for him?–

    who would even have thought that a parent would apply for a SS# for a teenager? When I was a teen, I applied for my own SS#.

    But now, thanks to Orly, we learn that in Thomas Wood’s case, his mother applied for him.

    Is this revelation what caused the sudden invention of a new story about how Barry got a SS# from Connecticut?

    Isn’t it curious how the application says “your address”, which would logically be the mailing address of the person for whom the SS# is being requested?

    Isn’t it also curious that Thomas himself didn’t sign this application?

    The form doesn’t clearly indicate that it’s okay for someone else to apply for the SS# and SIGN for that person. What other supporting documents had to be provided, I wonder?

    • Why weren’t those “additional documents” listed at the top of the application sent to Orly as part of the information request? Perhaps she requested one item- the application without request all documentation associated with Thomas. If they were stonewalling her for a year, one has to wonder why. I guess the person in charge had to send the request to a “higher up” for permission to release the information. Amazing, the SSA acting like the DOH in Hawaii.

      Should we dissect the words in Ginger’s letter to see how she left out certifying the application. She certified the “print-outs” of computer information, and the application is not a print-out.

  2. If we consider the stories that mutate over time, with regard to BHO Sr. and his then-wife Ruth–one says they went to Kenya from the East Coast circa 1965/6. There, Mark and David were born. Some stories SAY that Ruth returned to the US with Mark (and David?) when Mark was 7, so about 1972, depending upon when you believe Mark was born. So maybe it is possible that BHO Sr. was in Connecticut in ’77, if he was visiting one of his families.

    Wouldn’t it be wonderful if there were actually documentable facts about this entire mishmash of supposed relatives? It becomes more and more clear why his bogus, fictional, ghostwritten “auto”biography contains deliberate errors in the timeline as well as “composite” characters.

  3. The next deceased person (at least officially) in that sequence is “Grazia, P” with the SS# 042-68-4429. It would narrow down the date range to see when that application was filed.
    I’m not one of those people who usually would suggest someone else go do research, in fact those people annoy me 🙂 but I’m (temporarily) weary of sending off for stuff from the government (either federal OR hawaii) so I likely won’t do this one. Just a thought though, if someone has $27, and a little patience, to throw at this. Normally one of these only takes about a week to get.

  4. And Free Republic is weighing in, too:
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2689090/posts

    For what they’re worth. I can’t keep up with the theories! There are ten thousand theories in the Naked Obamaverse.

  5. Commander Kerchner says,

    “I have heard tell that the man who originally had the SSN that Obama is now using was issued to an elderly man who lived in CT. I have heard that in the last years of his life he moved to Hawaii where he died. Now it is also said the Grandma Dunham, Obama’s maternal grandmother, worked as a part-timer or volunteer in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse. Thus she would have access to the estate files of anyone who died there. Thus if the elderly man originally from CT died intestate in Hawaii with no known relatives, Grandma Dunham would have known this person is a prime candidate to steal the SSN of since there would be no known surviving family worrying about the death benefit from SSN and that the benefit was not likely applied for and thus SSA did not know he died. Thus the SSN remained active for the deceased person and Obama could “adopt” it as his own. This allegation has not been 100% proven that I know of. But I thought I’d pass it along for the readers here in order to get further vetting of this. But such an event would explain how the SSN from a CT person ended up in Hawaii and used by Obama.”

    And also,
    “Re. The man who originally had the SSN that Obama is now using was issued to an elderly man who lived in CT in the late 1970s. I have since found online that the elderly man’s name from CT whose SSN Obama is using, i.e., a clear case of Identify Theft, was named Sean Paul Ludwig. Does anyone out there have the ability to see if they can confirm that a Sean Paul Ludwig lived in Hawaii at some point late in his life and/or died there?

    CDR Kerchner (Ret)”

    Appears the name is actually Jean Paul Ludwig, but it also appears that his SS# is not the one Barry uses. Except and of course, they can always be a step ahead on the scrub-a-dub-dubbing and the “cauterizing” of files as fast as we uncover them. Can’t they? Why else do bots exist?

    • The social security numbers are not even close.

      Jean Ludwig 045-26-8722
      Thomas Wood 042-68-4424

      Jean Ludwig
      Birth Date: 17 Feb 1890
      Death Date: Jun 1981
      Social Security Number: 045-26-8722
      State or Territory Where Number Was Issued: Connecticut
      Death Residence Localities
      ZIP Code: 96816
      Localities: Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii
      Death Benefit Localities
      Zip Code: 96816
      Localities: Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii

      http://www.familysearch.org/eng/default.asp

      • You’re right again, Bridgette. I wonder where they come up with these other names? They throw them out there for what reason? (Not that I doubt Cmdr. Kerchner’s intentions. He might have been fed this name. It does seem as if he’s asking for more information.)

        It’s a plausible theory but poor Madelyn gets the blame for all. One wonders, if she was so complicit, why she had to be virtually locked up and gagged towards the end. Why the poor woman wasn’t even visited by her great-granddaughters prior to her death. Why they didn’t even bother to go to her funeral. Or even her “tossing to the four winds.” I would have given anything to know my own great-grandmothers. How about you? Here they are, lucky to have her, and yet she’s kept from them, apparently. They give lip service to how beloved “Toot” was, but actions speak louder than words.

        I guess I have this vision of lawyers working in tandem with hotshot PI’s. You know, like Perry Mason and the intrepid Paul. (Can’t remember his surname.)

      • There are 29 people named Jean Ludwig listed in the Social Security Death Index. There is only one born in 1890, and only one who was issued a number in Connecticut, and only one who lived in HI. That person is the one listed above. There is no second entry for this Jean in the index.

        http://www.familysearch.org/eng/search/frameset_search.asp?PAGE=/eng/search/ancestorsearchresults.asp

      • This answers the question of where he was born and where his family came from..France. Original document.

        United States, WWII Draft Registration cards, 1942
        Name: John Paul Ludwig
        Gender: Male
        Serial number 119 John Paul Ludwig
        Address: High Ridge, Rd., New Canaan, Fairfield, Connecticut
        PO Box 458 New Canaan Conn
        Telephone New Canaan 9-1628
        Age: 52
        Place of Birth: Ammersville, France
        Date of Birth: Feb. 17, 1890
        Name of person who will always know your address:
        Florence Ludwig address same
        Employer’s name: S. A. Reed, New Canaan Conn.
        Film Number: 2283648
        Digital Folder Number: 4135845
        Image Number: 05496

        https://www.familysearch.org/search/image/show#uri=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.familysearch.org%2Frecords%2Fpal%3A%2FMM9.1.i%2Fdgs%3A004135845.004135845_05496

      • Okay. So it appears that Rootsweb is the source for the supposed death in CA:
        http://vitals.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ca/death/search.cgi

        Enter Jean Paul Ludwig in the search argument and you get this:
        Last Name LUDWIG
        First Name JEAN
        Middle PAUL
        Birth Date 02/17/1890
        Mother Maiden SALOME
        Father Last
        Sex M
        Birth Place REST (OTHER)
        Death Place SAN LUIS OBISPO
        Residence
        Death Date 06/19/1981
        SSN 045-26-8722
        Age 91

        There’s no code to state the source, whether a family member or VERIFIED by a death record. However, on that screen, if you click on the SS#, it goes to the death index record that Bridgette found, which says his last benefit was sent to Honolulu, which was his last address of record. See this link:
        http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/ssdi.cgi?ssn1=045&ssn2=26&ssn3=8722

        So now I’m rethinking what I think I see in SS Death Index records. Could it be that all along I (and others) have assumed the death took place in a specific place, but that’s really only the address where the person’s benefits were sent?

        So he perhaps lived in Hawaii and COLLECTED BENEFITS there, and perhaps died in California. Whatever the case, we know he was collecting SS benefits and that he is dead and reported as such to SS and that his SS# was NOT the number Barry uses.

  6. does anyone really believe that a man born in 1890 would get a social security card in 1977? he would already be 87…..

    his name does not appear to be Jean Ludwig unless he also had multiple SSNs…hmmm.

    From ORYR:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/03/social-security-dump-new-details-on.html

    We get more info on Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in 1890, had CT SSN obtained in 1976 and died in HI. There are 2 SS numbers for him and records show him dying in 2 different states: CA and HI around 1981.

    The reason this is important, is because there is a similar fact pattern to Obama. Barack Obama is residing today in the White House, using CT SS number 042-68-4425, issued in CT in and around March 1977 to an elderly individual, who was born in 1890, who is presumed dead and whose death was either never reported to the SS administration or reported and deleted from the database by someone. We saw Obama use SS record of the deceased mother of Harry C. Ballantyne, actuary of the SS, who had access to all the records.

    I have questions re Ludwig: was he French or was he German who lived in France? Where did Ballantyne’s family come from? Was ever any connection between Ballantyne, William Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn, Stanley Dunham (Obama’s grandfather), Ludwigs?? You get the drift.

    Orly

  7. For anyone wRod Private Calls on U.S. Timelines of History . . .

    This may give you some insight on how and why things got so crazy…ALL 3 U.S. History Timelines by Rod…These are non-regular call recordings ! Go to the Talkshoe site
    http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&cmd=tc

    For all the call audio archives…they’re in the Past Episodes section on the landing page – just scroll down and click !

    Rod Class AIB Talkshoe Call Recording with Timeline #1 –
    Sat, Jan, 15, 2011
    A Time Line Of U.S. History (and others) And How The Usurpation Happened – Part 1
    [audio src="http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-439936.mp3" /]
    1 Hour 38 Minutes

    Rod Class and Jeanette AIB Talkshoe Call Recording with Timeline #2 – Wed, Jan 26, 2011
    A Time Line Of U.S. History (and others) And How The Usurpation Happened – Part 2
    http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-444324.mp3 2 Hours 31 Minutes

    And, in case you missed it…here’s Timeline #3…
    Rod class AIB Talkshoe Call Recording with Timeline #3 –
    Thurs, Jan 27, 2011
    A Time Line Of U.S. History (and others) And How The Usurpation Happened – Part 3
    [audio src="http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-444599.mp3" /]
    41 Minutes

    Who has the time,these are always interesting calls to listen to, long but interesting.

  8. you dont have to post my last comment..it was for your info and off topic but good info if you have time to listen.

  9. Since Jean Ludwig did die and since his death is recorded in the SS death index, and since the SS# recorded there is NOT the # Barry supposedly uses, why is Jean Ludwig important?

    This man came from France and worked for a senator from PA, or so the ORYR’s site says. So why did Jean get a SS# in CT, when he lived in HI before he died but he worked for a senator from PA? Presumably, when he worked for the senator, he already had a SS#. So did he get another when he was 87?

    The same person who reports all this claims that the death wasn’t reported to SS. But if that’s true, there would be no records in the SS death index to find.

    The other “two” records for his supposed death doubtless come from Ancestry.com, which often contains misinformation based upon user submitted data and/or mistakes in transcriptions. The only way to know for sure is to obtain the image of the actual documents upon which they based these death records (in CA and HI).

    It’s still a question, at this point, whether there is one man, Jean, or two men, Jean and Sean. Jean sounds like someone from France. Sean doesn’t. That would be an unusual name for a man born in 1890, unless he’s from Ireland.

    In any case, neither SS# supplied on that website is the one Barry supposedly uses.

    So who IS the person who was born in 1890 and who had that SS# before Barry?

    Or is the only thing we’re going on is that somebody, somewhere, for some reason, with no evidence, claimed that the number used to belong to a man born in 1890? Can somebody fill us in on some FACTS?

  10. OK. My great grandmother applied for my SS number – on my behalf – when I was a youngin. She lived in FL, I lived in VA – she signed for the thing, my mother never had anything to do with it at all. (she was a faded hippy-type) I believe I was between 8 – 10 years old when “Nanny” sent my SS card to me. She felt that I should have the thing. I have never thought much about it until lately with all of the obama crap. My Nanny was quite a force in her local politics and church community. I can tell you that there is not a thing in this world that ever existed that could have stopped Nanny from doing what she felt was right and correct to do.
    So, as I was born in (egad!) 1962, I know for a fact that a family member could absolutely apply on your behalf. Even if they lived in different state.
    That being said, I don’t believe a random nobody that happened to live in a far distant state could have randomly applied for a minor obama.

    • Thanks for that information. What sort of evidence did your nanny have to send to prove you even existed? It’s disturbing to think how easy it might have been to obtain SS#’s for other people.

      • I don’t know. It is possible that she had a copy of my BC I suppose. I remember that she applied for myself and my brother, but I never discussed how or why. The “why” may have been (in part) that she had a CD for each of us, in her name and ours. The bank may have required at some point that our SS# be added to the info on file in the event we were to cash the things in the future. I always felt that she just wanted us to be squared away with such things, and knew that my mother was too much of a “black sheep” to do something like applying for our SS#’s.
        I applied for all three of my children when they were infants.

        • I know that it became routine for parents to get SS#s for their kids, but I don’t know when that began. I applied for my own SS# when I wanted to work part time as a teenager. I don’t remember what I had to send as proof of identity, citizenship, etc. I do remember that circa 1980, you had to put some SS# on a savings bond, if it was in a kid’s name. However, we used to put the SS# of one of the parents. It was only to ensure that somebody paid the taxes on the interest, when the bonds were cashed. It was a right of passage in my day to get your SS#. But usually the reason was to get an afterschool job. It was actually rare for kids to work during high school, when I was a teen. I was the only one in my class. But then, again, I may have been the only one who had to work to pay my school tuition. We weren’t rolling in dough and my mom didn’t want us in public school. Home schooling? Nobody thought about it in those days. Not that I know of.

          • LibraryGryffon

            You now have to have a social security number for your child to claim them as a dependant on your tax return if they over 2 months old. I believe that the hospital actually sent in the application for us with our second child, born in 1998 in CT. I didn’t get mine till I was about 10, so I have a Michigan number even though I was born in Texas. At some point the IRS started demanding the number to claim children over 1yo on your taxes, and then in the late 80s or early 90s they lowered the age to 2 months.

  11. Can anyone provide a link to the person/people who actually said that Sean Paul Ludwig or John Paul Ludwig or Jean Paul Ludwig had the SS# that Obama is using? They need to provide proof of their research. Unless they do, this just seems to be speculation to me or flat out incorrect. I’m giving them credit, because as we all know Obummers scrubbers could have made things change since they did their original research. They need to publish research ASAP!

  12. Someone has gone off on a tangent and others picked it up. I think that someone who didn’t know how to trace people found this Jean Ludwig born in 1890 in Cook County Illinois and went from there. That would be why Orly would want to know if they knew the Ayers. The original birth certificate of this 2nd person is available to view. I did. I transcribed it below. I don’t rely on others because there are so many errors made. I couldn’t read some of the letters, and the name of the father is Auer (Taken as Ayer?). The transcriber said Jean was a female and white, but the sex and race is not on the handwritten form so I don’t know where they got that information.

    Illinois, Cook County Birth Certificates, 1878-1922 for Jean Ludwig
    Name: Jean Ludwig
    Number of child of this mother: 5th
    Date of this birth: 06 May 1890
    Birthplace: 332 [Cook, Illinois]
    Gender: Sex not on form Female was on transcription
    Race: Not on form White on transcription
    Father’s Name: E.I.T. Auer or Ut Auer
    Father’s Birthplace: Germany Fengenstadt
    Father’s Age: 36y
    Mother’s Name: …eih Gerloff Auer or YIa Gerloff Yeta?
    Mother’s Birthplace: Germany Braunschveig
    Mother’s Age: 24y
    Occupation of Father Sleter
    Dated 31 May 1890 Signed 113 Brown Street Magdeline Struss

    https://www.familysearch.org/search/recordDetails/show?uri=https://api.familysearch.org/records/pal:/MM9.1.r/MZCP-6ZW/p1

    • I do not know though Bridgetteb, I am finding ties… I think maybe all these numbers may have ties and have been used. I think this is a mix of inside info coupled with some documentation. I am digging on it all now and noting the connections or possibles I have found before. There are too many possibles for me to ignore. We will see. I am looking into it all.

      • If there ARE ties, then we need to demonstrate them. To put it all together and wrap it up with a bow. These suppositions in the comments on other blogs (which Kerchner admits are unconfirmed, which is why he asked for help), are only that–suppositions. And they may be put out there by obots seeking to distract or send everybody off on a wild goose chase.

        The point is that this person was FEMALE. So it can’t be the “Jean Ludwig” who DOESN’T have Barry’s SS#. It can’t be the MAN who died in HI. Her ancestor was AUER. There are hundreds of thousands of Auers in the world, and most probably in Chicago, too. The person who worked for a PA senator and who died in HI, was a MAN, supposedly from FRANCE (not Chicago), and has been called Sean as well as Jean. There are probably hundreds of men who were born in 1890, who lived in CT and maybe even some who died in HI. There’s no sourcing on those claims. It’s been debunked, as far as I’m concerned, unless and until they provide EVIDENCE, which means SOURCES (and not just index records from online databases that are subject to multiple errors as well as user-provided data that’s about as accurate as Wikipedia was before they at least made an attempt at ensuring accuracy).

        • Must correct myself: Bridgette says the transcription says female but the record itself doesn’t. That’s interesting. What’s also interesting is that the father’s name is Auer and the mother’s maiden name is Gerloff, yet this child is named Jean LUDWIG. Why not Auer?

          • When I read it I thought that Auer was one of the first names not the last name. Did you look at the document? The first letters of the parents names appear to be in old German lettering and I can’t remember what they are. I haven’t read them in a long time. Will check it out again.

            The E.I.T. Auer… the reason I thought that was because many Germans have 3 or 4 first names and go by one of them. Yet in records, you can find them by one of the four names. So that is what I was thinking when I read it again.

            Jean Ludwig could be the name given as a first and middle name and then they didn’t use the last name on the document.

          • I found a record for their marriage in the IL state archives. It says the man was Edward Auer and her name was Ida Gealoff (could be a transcription error, so might be Gerloff). Married in 1884. Enter Auer for the groom:
            http://www.ilsos.gov/GenealogyMWeb/marrsrch.html

  13. There was an “Roman” Obama that went to Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow. Story in the Watertown Daily News 1992 Feb.14 page 8. “Obama 31 year old law student from Equatorial Guinea.” notes- not from but going thru. WAS this where Obama was instead of being Occidental
    /Colombia? Studying Sovietology?

  14. This is a comment on FR by Brown Deer, one of the resident “genealogists”:

    Jean Paul Ludwig was born on Feb 16, 1890 in Ammersville, France. He emigrated to New York in Sept 1920 and became a butler/valet for Senator David Aiken Reed of Pittsburgh, who also sponsored his naturalization. Throughout the following years, they made numerous trips together all over the world. Ludwig died in San Luis Obispo on June 19, 1981.

    Since Major Reed served overseas in World War I with the 311th Field Artillery participating in the Meuse-Argonne and Verdun offensives, he probably first met Ludwig in France before 1920. Reed first began his travels to Honolulu and Hong Kong before WW1, with a U.S. passport obtained in 1914.

    • This would SEEM to match the person that Bridgette recorded above from the SS Death Index and the War Records database, with two differences: He died in Honolulu, according to the SS death index, and his dob was Feb. 17, according to the same index. So where does the San Luis Obispo information come from?

  15. This appears to be the source for the 1890 claim; you’ll have to search for 1890:
    http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/list-of-properties-and-social-security-numbers-associate-with-barack-obama-and-family/

    Name – OBAMA, BARACK HUSSEIN
    Gender – Male
    Street Address – 365 BROADWAY APT B1
    City, State, Zip – SOMERVILLE MA 02145-2440
    Probable Current Address – No
    Telephone –
    Telephone Accountholder –
    Social Security – 042-68-xxxx
    Age – 119
    Date of Birth – 1890
    Deceased – No
    Date Record Verified –

    • Good find on this one Miri. This is the list that I looked for that shows all of his social security numbers.

      Now I remember.. Yes, Neil Sankey, the former Scotland Yard investigator!

      “The person who generated the list of names, addresses, and SSNs is Mr. Neil Sankey, a former British policeman who’s now a licensed private investigator in Los Angeles.”

      • I remember that now…

        • Bridgette, Is this going to go to the post I have on Roman Holiday and future ( past and present) wiki leaks dump ? The old story of the pending arrests and INTERPOL agents that came here 2 years ago they say ?
          Just one, big, happy, cloud of theft ?
          Really, what a huge mess…

    • Does anyone remember ever seeing the full numbers on any of the other SS# in that list? the 364-03-XXXX is a Michigan number, and according to the SS death index there are three people who died in Hawaii with those first 5 digits…all between 1994 and 1996. Now that may mean nothing, but that is around the time his book came out, he was living in Chicago, maybe a good time for a fresh SS#?

  16. Via butterdezillion at Free Republic;

    Actually, there’s a LOT of doubt that he’s a US citizen, unless he naturalized at some point. He doesn’t have a legally-valid Hawaii BC, and he’s been using SOME legally-valid BC his whole life long.

    His need to manufacture a US social security number when he transferred from Occidental to Columbia totally fits the other evidence we have.

    IIRC, it was in the summer right before he transferred to Columbia that Race Bannon spoke to Obama – who said he was born in Mombassa, grew up in Indonesia, and was going to be President someday. That also seems to be when his Muslim friend from Occidental had connections and they visited Pakistan. I wonder when the Saudi prince began to finance Obama’s education, as per Percy Sutton.

    If it’s documented that the particular SSN Obama uses actually belongs to somebody else, then Obama should be in deep, deep doo-doo, if America was anything but a third-world dictatorship. Unfortunately, it’s not at this point.

    I would presume that the SSN verification showed the number hadn’t been issued because the search was for that number UNDER OBAMA’S NAME, and no name/number combination like that was ever issued.

    Wow. Looks like we were right all along. He most probably switched from the foreign identity that he had at Occidental to the supposedly-US identity he’s had at Columbia and ever since through the help of Grandma Dunham. A social security number can be used to get genuine documents and from then on the paper trail would seem legitimate.

    That would explain why his college records are sealed and why they had to sanitize his passport records and hide his mother’s passport records for the time surrounding his birth and childhood. It’s all fitting into place.

    52 posted on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 2:14:08 PM by butterdezillion

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2689090/posts?page=52#52

  17. Isn’t Race Bannon the guy from Jonny Quest?
    That’s it! BHO is Hadji! Adopted son of Dr. Benton Quest!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonny_Quest

  18. A great read! Thanks! I’ll be posting reposting this.
    Keep the info coming!

  19. Another look at Obama’s Social Security number
    March 17, 2011 Snips

    This being the case, I asked Daniels to guide me through the data mine field and help me ascertain what we know for sure about the world’s best-known Social Security number – 042-68-4425.

    “All I can say,” says Daniels of 042-68-4425, “is that it’s phony and [Obama] has been using it, with it first appearing on his Selective Service document in 1980.”

    Daniels sent me a copy of the hand-written application of the individual who held the number immediately before Obama’s, 042-68-4424. The applicant, Thomas Wood, died at age 19, which is why his information is available.

    Wood’s Social Security number was issued sometime between March and May of 1977. Obama would turn 16 in August of that year. Woods lived on Glenview Drive in Newington, Conn., the state from which all “042s” applied. Obama lived in Hawaii.

    snip

    Daniels also sent me a copy of Obama’s Selective Service data. Obama appears to have registered on Sept. 4, 1980, a month after his 19th birthday. The form lists the telling last four digits of his “042” number, “4425.”

    This is the first use of the “042” number that Daniels could find. She is just not sure it is legitimate. Some have credibly argued that the Selective Service information was forged and backdated once Obama became a presidential candidate.

    “They were stupid to use the CT number on the [Selective Service] card,” Daniels adds, “because now there is no way for [Obama] to back out of that number.”

    Other than the 1980 Selective Service registration, the first time Daniels could find Obama using the “042” number was in 1986 in Chicago.

    As to how Obama may have secured that number, it is possible that he turned to his radical friends for friends for advice.

    “We invented all kinds of ways to obtain false identity papers, and got busy building multiple sets of ID for each of us and for every contingency,” writes Bill Ayers of his years in the Weather Underground. “We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart.”

    Daniels and Sankey have tracked Obama’s many uses of the “042” number in Chicago, in Massachusetts and in Washington. Others numbers appear with the “Obama” name, but Daniels cautions against attributing these numbers – with the exception of those from Obama’s college days at Occidental – to the president.

    From Daniels’ perspective, one felonious use of a fraudulent number is enough. She believes this to be a more tangible scandal then the birth certificate and wonders when someone beyond WND will start paying attention.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=275861#ixzz1GqNBhxej

    • EXCLUSIVE: Did Next Commander-in-Chief Falsify Selective Service Registration? Never Actually Register? Obama’s Draft Registration Raises Serious Questions
      November 13, 2008, – 1:56 am
      By Debbie Schlussel Copyright 2008 Snip

      Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of this year? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him?

      It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. A friend of mine, who is a retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to me.

      But the release of Obama’s draft registration and an accompanying document, posted below, raises more questions than it answers. And it shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama’s claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.
      cont.

      http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in-chief-falsify-selective-service-registration-never-actually-register-obamas-draft-registration-raises-serious-questions/

  20. These are from Debbie Schlussel’s URL above. The explanation of these are in her article. These are where the use of the SS Number was first revealed. I don’t see the SS #, but it now might be blacked out. Quickly visible is the question of how Obama signed it on the 30th and it was stamped the day before. ( 2nd photo).

    • These images clearly demonstrate why the “exclusive commentary” at WND (which Bridgette found today) does NOT include images of the copies of these documents that were sent to Cashill by Susan Daniels. Can you guess why images of the copies Daniels sent weren’t included in Cashill’s commentary, but backhanded insults to junior investigators without decoder rings were included?

      • The quote from Daniels in Cashill’s “exclusive commentary”, to which I refer:

        “As much as Daniels appreciates the work of WND and other serious investigators who have helped clarify the picture, she is distressed by the few who have clouded it.

        ‘There have been many playing junior investigator from the start,’ she jokes. ‘I don’t know if they even have their decoder rings yet.'”

        I have my decoder ring handy. Do you? I can decode the messages in this exclusive commentary.

  21. Kudos to Stephen Coffman, retired FEDERAL AGENT, who’s the junior investigator without a decoder ring who requested these documents, and to Debbie Schlussel who FIRST and EXCLUSIVELY published them on her blog in 2008.

    • Planet Krypton, Suparman oops, Superman. Keep it hush hush but we can make decoder rings with magic stones from Krypton ok ?
      Like it ?

  22. Guess who’s speaking in Duke Chapel right now?

    The Ground Zero Mosque Imam!

    ——————————————–

    {Remainder of this comment moved to the open thread.}

  23. Here’s a link to the info about Surick’s decision in Berg v Obama being faxed to him from somebody else:

    http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/

    Here’s a link to Hagmann’s initial story about the media being threatened if they reported on the eligibility issue:
    http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373

    by butterdezillion

    • Good job with the links Bridgett. Do you remember, did the financial crisis happen before or after this decision? It seems like I remember Congress having a closed door session and one of the members stating that it was the worst thing possible. Do you remember anything like that?

      • If I recall it was mid September 200 8 when the financial collapse occurred. That is when Paulson told Bush that our economy was at a perilous point and TARP was necessary. Remember McCain was ridiculed for leaving the campaign and returning to Congress for the vote.

        I’d have to look it up but there was one particular day when it became a global crisis.. and has been suggested that it was a manufactured crisis that occurred on Wall Street causing the major drop in the stock market. (Soros?) There were multiple financial collapses happening around the same time (Lehman Brothers, Fannie and Freddie) so it seems September was the worst month.

  24. Obama’s 16 Different Social Security Numbers
    The Obama File
    Feb 1, 2010

    Private investigator Neil Sankey, using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Barack Obama’s name.

    However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: “Barak Obama,” “Batock Obama,” “Barok Obama,” and “Barrack Obama.” There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name. In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name.

    Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided. Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.

    In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at.
    Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042, and one starting 364.

    In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999, which are not valid SSNs.

    There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.

    In Massachusetts — where Obama attended Harvard Law School — we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one. Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.

    This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.

    Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427

    Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.

    Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.

    Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.

    Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as “Barry Obama.” One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.

    In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers: 579, 420, and 423.

    In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.

    There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

    All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.” In some cases, the middle initial “H” is listed. If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as: “Barac,” “Barak,” and “Barrack” Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.

    Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut. Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

    Extracted from an article by Steve Baldwin. Read the whole thing here

    Susan Daniels, a second investigator filed an affidavit, with true and correct copies here, in the Barnett v. Obama case. Susan Daniels is a private investigator, licensed by the State of Ohio.

    In her affidavit, Daniels states that she has located Barack Obama’s Social Security Number. She states it was issued between 1977 and 1979 in the State of Connecticut. She states that it is the only Social Security Number Barack Obama ever used.

    The number assigned to Barack Obama “appears to be associated with someone born in the year 1890.”

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2689090/posts?page=52#52

    • Here’s the source for that comment at FR: http://www.westernjournalism.com/exclusive-investigative-reports/the-mystery-of-barack-obama-continues/

      I’m glad Baldwin excluded the various other spellings but still came up with curious discrepancies. I have some addresses in the O Timeline for where Barry lived in NYC. I believe these addresses came from news articles, based upon interviews with his friends, but I could be misremembering. One would think that Sankey and Daniels would have found those addresses, too.

      So now we know that one source of their information is Intelius. Unfortunately, those databases have errors in them; but it’s highly unlikely that ALL of Barry’s numerous “errors” ARE errors and not deliberate fraud.

      So Daniels stated (is this true?) in her affidavit that the CT number is “the only Social Security Number Barack Obama ever used.” Huh? Didn’t she say otherwise in that WND article yesterday?

  25. Are Social Security numbers reused after a person dies?

    No. We do not reassign a Social Security number (SSN) after the number holder’s death. Even though we have issued over 453 million SSNs so far, and we assign about 5 and one-half million new numbers a year, the current numbering system will provide us with enough new numbers for several generations into the future with no changes in the numbering system.”

    When did Social Security start?

    The Social Security Act was signed by FDR on 8/14/35. Taxes were collected for the first time in January 1937 and the first one-time, lump-sum payments were made that same month. Regular ongoing monthly benefits started in January 1940.

    Is there any significance to the numbers assigned in the Social Security Number?

    Yes. The first three digits are assigned by the geographical region in which the person was residing at the time he/she obtained a number. Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers. The remaining six digits in the number are more or less randomly assigned and were organized to facilitate the early manual bookkeeping operations associated with the creation of Social Security in the 1930s.

    http://www.ssa.gov/history/hfaq.html

  26. https://www.sss.gov/RegVer/wfError.aspx?Message=BADATTEMPT&src=v

    That’s the search that was used when Coffman and Schlussel first revealed Barry’s Selective Service record. NOW, as then, when you try to verify Barry’s information, you get this message,
    “Error.
    Sorry, your request cannot be processed at this time because you have exceeded the daily limit for the verification of these credentials.
    (3/18/2011 3:42:13 PM)”

    The date/time stamp is interesting. One would almost think that they’re recording who is asking for this information and when. WHY? FYI, I didn’t ask for ANY verification of ANY other credentials today or probably for the past year. So how could I possibly EXCEED the “daily limit”. What, btw, is the daily limit?

    Oh, yes, indeedy. Our wonderful government does indeed track us:
    “Security Statement
    If you browse through this Web site, read pages, or download information, we will gather and store certain information about your visit automatically. This information does not identify you personally and is only used to improve future visits to the site. The information we automatically collect and store is as follows:

    The Internet domain (for example, “xcompany.com” if you use a private Internet access account or “yourschool.edu” if you connect from a university’s domain);
    Your IP address (an IP address is a number that is automatically assigned to your computer whenever you are surfing the Web) from which you access our Web site;
    The type of browser and operating system used to access our site;
    The date and time you access our site;
    The pages you visit; and
    If you linked to our Web site from another Web site, the address of that Web site.
    We use this information to help us make our site more useful to visitors, to learn about the number of visitors to our site, and the types of technology our visitors use. We do not track or record information about individuals and their visits.”

    It doesn’t track individuals but it does store your IP# and the date and time and the pages you visited. How about the search arguments you entered?

    • Why do they want to know who is accessing the information? If they get a million hits in one day, what will they do with those numbers ? What a waste of database space. Who is monitoring that database?

      • Who knows? Somebody needs to stay up until midnight DC time (is that where their office/computer is?) and do a search on Barry immediately when the new day rolls around. Ya think they’ll let ya through?

  27. Oh, how clever they are. I don’t have a daily limit. Barry’s record has one. So if three other people have already accessed Barry’s record today, then I can’t see it. So we are just supposed to take their word for it that somewhere in this world there are three people who TODAY were allowed to see Barry’s selective service record. I entered the 042 SS#, Obama, and his supposed dob.

    WND had a story about this:
    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=156573

    • At least WND got through and has a screen shot of what people can’t see.

      • Yeah. They have a screen shot but looks like the SS# is redacted. What’s interesting is that the Sel. Serv. guy hems and haws when pinned down. Or he admits that the computer people do. First he said it’s three previous tries, then he changes that story when WND said they tried three for another person and weren’t locked out. This is all bull. It’s special treatment for Barry because they screwed up in making up all the bogus history for him. Now they’re stuck with what’s out there already. They can hardly now go back and change things, so instead they just hide it all.

  28. The number beginning with 999..I think I read that it was assigned to refugees/orphans or foreigners.. something like that. Before I look into it further, why would we give a social security card to foreigners in the first place? Workers get workers visas to work in this country. Are they also contributing to social security and where and how do they get it returned?
    This isn’t making sense.

    I didn’t see anything about it on the government SSA page.
    I didn’t want to forget that I was looking into this.

    • I don’t think they assigned 999 SS#s to foreigners, or any SS#s at all.

      Somebody said (do we know this is true?) that his Occidental records had all 9’s in the SS#. That probably means that he didn’t have a SS# to enter in the data field for the computer record. For whatever reason.

      Either he didn’t have one or it wasn’t expected that he would have one, if he was registered as a foreign student.

      Computer data fields are defined as numeric, alphabetic, or both. Usually, to ensure complete data entry, they’d code a program to require a number (like a SS#) to be entered. If skipped over, it would be filled with zeroes, but the program would then reject that as a “null” field. (Again, to make sure the data entry operators didn’t leave out any data.)

      But this wouldn’t account for the fact that in some unusual instances there wouldn’t be a number to enter.

      So they’d make a trade off. They’d still make the field “mandatory entry” to make sure that data entry operators put in a number, which they would have in most cases; but in the exceptional cases (like no SS#), they’d force them to consciously enter all 9’s.

      This would indicate to anybody who saw the record later on, that this person had no SS#. And they would know the reason why. In the case of a college, perhaps because it was a foreign student. My guess, and it’s only a guess, is that even back in the 70s and 80s, if students were getting any kind of aid from the government to pay for their classes, then they had SS#’s.

      I’m talking about the old days. When there were keypunchers or data entry operators who keyed data onto floppy disks. But even today, I bet that people who enter data on computers have to do a similar thing–put in a “dummy” number when there isn’t a number to enter.

      • Yes, you reminded me..I read it was a placeholder in the old computer databases. TY.

        Also how would they know that 999’s were in Obama’s Occidental records? Those records were sealed.

  29. How do they know about the 999s. Yeah. That’s what I’d like to know. We see this stuff thrown out there, but we don’t know where it’s from. If I had to guess, I’d say they found an Intelius record (or some other database) record that had addresses in CA. And at that time, those 999’s were given as his SS#. Would it maybe be in that list of SS#’s for Barry? I don’t even know where that is now.

  30. I’m losing it. I can’t keep track of all these facts that probably aren’t facts. It’s in a story you linked, Bridgette: “In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college. However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999, which are not valid SSNs.”

    So two records have addresses close to Occidental and they’re assuming they were created when he was there at college.

    I was looking into that Choicepoint search thingy this morning. It’s apparently used by government to do background checks, so one would think it might have more accurate data, but there was some controversy (this is rich!) about it having a conservative bias and how it’s hard for people to correct errors. It’s somehow, if I understand correctly, also connected with Lexis/Nexis. Our resident news sleuth, Newssleuth, might be familiar with these databases.

    Oh, criminy sakes! Look at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChoicePoint

    “ChoicePoint (previous NYSE ticker symbol CPS) was a data aggregation company based in Alpharetta, near Atlanta, Georgia, United States, that acted as a private intelligence service to government and industry.[2] It was purchased in February 2008 by Reed Elsevier (parent corporation of LexisNexis) in a cash deal for $3.6 billion USD.”

    Alpha-freaking-retta, Georgia! Now where do we know that location from?

  31. could be Internet hysteria,

    but a few minutes after I sent this to a colleague at work, it disappeared
    from my searchhistory,
    fortunately I had the email sent history

    See what ya think

    http://www.prahlad.org/pub/bearden/scalar_wars.htm

    • Well, Tesla was a genius. Wasn’t it said that his experiments caused buildings to shake? Have you ever seen a Tesla coil? It’s freakin’ amazing. Tesla, iirc, said electricity could easily be free for all.

  32. HERE IS THE ROUTE TO TRUTH: Demand that Congress adopt the following proposed law:
    “It is necessary that the citizens of the United States be fully informed as to the identity, qualifications, character and eligibility of all persons who seek election to the office of President of the United States sufficiently in advance of such election or appointment to make an informed decision about whether to vote for such candidate.
    Therefore, any person who declares himself or herself to be a candidate for the office of President of the United States, shall produce and make freely available to the public ALL records relating to their personal history, including birth, residency, education, diplomas and degrees conferred, employment, military service, foreign travel, academic records including essays and other papers submitted to any institution of learning, political activities, organizations in which he or she has been or is a member or participant, all sources of income, personal tax returns, gifts received of $5,000 or more value, from any source, legal proceedings in which he or she was a party, and any convictions of a crime involving moral terpitude. Such candidate shall certify under oath that such information as is published according to this act, is complete and accurate, and includes all information necessary to make the rest of such information not deceptive or misleading.
    Such disclosure shall be made at the time of announcing his or her candidacy, and the documents and information disclosed shall be filed with the United States Elcction Commission. All of such records and information shall be safeguarded by the Commission and the Commission shall promptly allow any member of the public to have reasonable access to all of such information and to copy all or such parts of it as they may request.
    Any State, political party, or other public interest organization who shall be aggrieved by a failure or alleged failure of such a candidate to comply with this act, shall have standing to file a suit directly in the United States Supreme Court against such candidate to compel full and fair compliance, or to challenge the constitutional qualification of the candidate to hold the office of President.”
    If the Republican Party introduces the bill, the Dems will look very bad opposing it, and when it passes House and Senate, Obama will give himself away when he vetos it; thus insuring that he will not be re-electred in 2012.

  33. philip di russo

    there was a time when illegals could and did get ss #s by going to a cemetery and obtining the deceased names birth and death records and appling for a ss card.

  34. Col. Hollister Facing Legal Trouble for Verifying that Obama’s Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants was Never Issued.
    Wednesday, March 30, 2011

    As previously reported here, Colonel Gregory Hollister verified via the Social Security Number Verification Service that Obama’s social security number was “never issued” even though Obama used the social security number in his Selective Service Registration.

    The Obots are doing their best to have Col. Hollister prosecuted for verifying the number via the database. I guess they don’t understand that Obama works for us which makes Obama our EMPLOYEE. Got Standing!?

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/03/col-hollister-facing-legal-trouble-for.html

    • The left leaning Obama Colorado media is hard at work. This is the second piece published out of Denver. Don’t check out Obama’s Fraud dear Media… Go for the person that is outing the Usurper! The WH Squatter is who you should be after if you only had a brain.

      The article is posted at the following:

      Miri | March 31, 2011 at 10:59 am
      https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/obamas-house-of-cards-is-collapsing/comment-page-2/#comment-51182

      Springs Man Claims To Have Obama’s Draft Records
      Col. Gregory Hollister Says He Has Obama’s Draft Registration

      Hollister told the Gazette that according to the Social Security Administration, that number was never issued, but that’s the same Social Security number that appears on Obama’s Selective Service documents.

      http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27372400/detail.html

    • The [SSA] site allows registered users to verify names and Social Security numbers for employment purposes and warns that using it under false pretenses is a violation of federal law.

      Obama works for us…We the People … Obama was sent a 1099 form..

      Employers use a variety of forms to record the income earned by an employee or an independent contractor. A 1099 is a tax form for independent contractors that shows how much they made from a certain business. This 1099 income is also reported to the Internal Revenue Service so it has the opportunity to track income from freelance workers. The freelancer will be obligated to make his or her own tax deductions and forward such payments to the IRS.

      http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-1099-form.htm

  35. Birther Who Impersonated Obama Claims He Accessed the President’s Selective Services Records
    March 30, 2011

    A Colorado man–and birther–who falsely impersonated President Barack Obama in an attempt to track down the president’s personal records could face charges.

    According to the Colorado Springs Gazette [we’ve seen the story]

    “According to the Social Security Administration, that number was never issued,” said Hollister, the birther. But that social security number is on the Selective Service documents Hollister allegedly managed to obtain.

    Hollister said the Social Security number on what he says is Obama’s draft registration begins with the numbers 042, which would be issued to someone born in Connecticut, not Hawaii.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/birther-who-impersonated-obama-claims-he-accessed-the-presidents-selective-services-records/

    • They are picking up the Hollister story and only a little on the REAL Story about Obama’s fraudulent application with the false SS #!

      They show the SS Change of Information form. I can’t tell what that one means..anyone? Is this like a change of address form so information was sent to Hollister? They don’t explain.

      Hey, was Obama born in Connecticut instead of Hawaii?

      Will there be charges of Obama impersonating a president, or perpetrating fraud on U.S. citizens, identity theft, or false and forged documentation? When will the media look at that angle? This time we aren’t shooting the messenger. If he did wrong, it was to save the country..not to destroy it!

      • Hey, was Obama born in Connecticut instead of Hawaii?

        That name Wood….

      • I think their point is that Hollister requested a copy of the documents and to do so, he registered with his own address, so the information was sent to him (if their allegation is true) and at the same time, the software system changed Barry’s address to Mr. Hollister’s. They’re just copying that article we found earlier this week, from Colorado Springs. It says he could face charges, but so far as I know, that’s only supposition and speculation put out there by obots. Has anyone ever mentioned that there’s an on-going investigation by actual legal authorities into this alleged action by Hollister? I don’t think so. The obots think they’re so clever because somebody CLAIMS to be able to read postal service bar codes and then CLAIMS that somehow that barcode proves that Mr. Hollister was sent the documents (which he must have been because he posted them!). But so far, all claims by obots.

  36. I am really confused. Way back when there first was a question about Obama’s ss#, I went to familysearch, which eventually led me to a death index and the name associated with the CT number was to a LADY. Everything I found was exactly like the article I had originally read, which said a LADY. A couple of days later I went to show others and Nothing came up on the index. Now, everyone seems to be saying this CT number is to a MAN. Back then I did not know about screen shots. Has anyone else been walking around for the longest time, like me, thinking it was a dead LADY with the original CT number? Anyone remember any of this? It is driving me crazy.

    • You may be correct. They scrubadubdub as soon as the obots notice anybody finding information. I don’t remember when the number was first revealed. I do wish someone had saved a screenshot. Famous last words–I can’t even count anymore the times when I should have saved a screenshot, but didn’t. I do remember some people saying it was a woman. Actually, all we have to go on now is that birth year of 1890 and that it’s a CT number.

        • That’s so funny, Leza. What might have been if not for the sex change? HA!

        • ROTFLOL…..Where did that photo come from? It does have the widows peak hair line like the double in photographs. Was he a she, or a cross dresser?

          • LOL, I found it searching Obama jpg on Startpage. Im not sure if its been photo shopped or not. Bridgette could you work your magic and see if the picture has been photshopped, please… It sure would answer ALOT of questions. 🙂

          • Kathy, what’s fascinating is that whoever created that photo did a hell of a better job than whoever photoshopped ANY of the Obama Fab Family photos. This person has a future. He or she should offer most excellent photoshopping services to the next BOGUS POTUS. Or this one! Do you think anybody’d notice if they changed every darned Fab Family photo at this point? You know, an expert could really clean them up. Straighten those giraffe necks. Get rid of those extra fingers, hands, third legs. That is an excellent photo. Either it’s real, that’s his twin sister who didn’t get a sex change, or he’s a cross dresser. And better looking than his own wife. 🙂

        • You found it! You found it! That is what the He/ She is hiding! That is what would prove embarrassing if the BC were released! It makes perfect sense. Wow, now we have a black, Muslim, New Guinea born he/she as a president! The Left will be ecstatic. It is their dream of diversity all wrapped up in one package!

        • Answer to your request below. This is the ID of the photo. Note bold.

          ÿØÿà JFIF  ` ` ÿá |Exif II*   1 & i‡  2 Picasa 2.7    0210   P     n    0100 ÿí Photoshop 3.0 8BIM P Picasa 2.7

    • What a Hoot….Do you happen to remember the ladies name you saw?

  37. http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/04/final-report-obamas-birth-announcements.html

    What do you all make of this article about the birth announcements. I haven’t read it all myself yet, or digested it. But it seems to make some new claims that I’m not sure are correct. Do you know anything about this blogger?

    • Didn’t read it yet, but yes know daily pen. Don’t know if the author is the same. The article featured was from dailypen. Newsleuth called it speculative at the time.

      OCON Docs: Hawaii Ballot Chief, Not Grandma, Called Obama To Hawaii In 2008

      Official Certifications of Nomination (OCON)

      https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/ocon-docs-hawaii-ballot-chief-not-grandma-called-obama-to-hawaii-in-2008/

      • I thought the name sounded familiar. He makes a lot of claims in that new story and I’m still wondering if somebody’s assuming instead of confirming. Some EVIDENCE would help. Like, how did the guy confirm that thousands of illegitimate babies were announced as offspring of “Mr. and Mrs.”? I believe that Hawaiian law didn’t allow for a father’s name on the BC if the mother was single. So the child was given the mother’s surname. There would be no “Mr.” for the newspaper to list. So where would the father’s name come from? Still, how did he confirm in even one instance (evidence please) that an illegitimate child was announced as a child of a Mr. and Mrs. when there was no mister?

        As for the birth numbers given at an ancillary location and then the announcements made in birth number order instead of alphabetically, that makes little sense, too. It doesn’t agree with what others have found out–that the State Registrar assigned the BC#’s at the central location. They could be filed in any office, but the number was assigned when the record was accepted (meaning if not in a hospital, the supplementary evidence was presented, vetted, and ACCEPTED by the registrar as legitimate).

        How does he know the BC#s for any of the children announced? Is he assuming that since they’re not in alphabetical or date born order, they must be in order by source of registration? While that might be, how does he KNOW it is? EVIDENCE, please? Some examples to prove the allegation is true or even likely to be true?

    • Same author as the OCON.

      Will see if he has different information or picked it up from Lady Forest.

      Saturday, April 2, 2011
      FINAL REPORT: Obama’s Birth Announcements Fail To Indicate “Natural Born” Status

      A new investigation of Obama’s birth announcements appearing in Hawaii’s two primary newspapers in August, 1961 shows, conclusively, they were the result of a registration record taken by the municipal health authority, not a medically verified “Live” birth documented as occurring at a Hawaiian hospital, per an officially defined “vital event” by the U.S. Department of Health, National Vital Statistics Division protocols.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s