© Miri WTPOTUS October 28, 2011
Attorney Leo Donofrio has exposed Justia, an Internet-based law library, for apparently scrubbing crucial information from Supreme Court rulings just prior to the 2008 election, possibly to protect Barack Hussein Obama II’s candidacy.
The scrubbed information included any reference to a Supreme Court ruling, Minor v. Happersett, that defined the phrase natural born citizen.
Had the general public known about the SCOTUS ruling that defined natural born citizen, 2008 would have seen a very different election. Many more Americans would have known that Barack Hussein Obama II was, and remains, ineligible for the presidency under the Constitution.
Natural born citizenship is a REQUIREMENT under the Constitution for the presidency–a requirement even more important than age, because it touches upon sole ALLEGIANCE and undivided LOYALTY to the United States of America. Any thinking and honest person must agree that it’s critical for a president, who commands the armed forces, to have unquestioned, undivided loyalty and sole allegiance to the United States. This was so important to the Founders that they wrote this requirement into the Constitution. The requirement cannot be changed by any law or resolution passed by Congress. The only way to modify the qualifications for the presidency is through a Constitutional amendment.
After the ruling containing this SCOTUS definition was scrubbed from that particular online legal resource, “obots” (robot-like Obama supporters) posted comments ad nauseum on blogs, and published articles on their own and mainstream media blogs, promoting the LIE that the Supreme Court has NEVER defined the phrase natural born citizen.
Quite possibly the obots felt confident about spreading the lie because they knew that the database most likely to be checked by a curious public had been conveniently “cauterized of embarrassing information,” a situation we’ve seen before with this administration. The explanation put forward by Justia, after the scrubbing came to light, alleges a “coding error” made by inept programmers. More about that in a moment.
The SCOTUS did, in the Minor case, define natural born citizen:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
Since Obama’s father was never even a permanent resident of the United States, much less a U.S. citizen, Obama is not a natural born citizen. Obama was born a British subject, which he admits. He later became a Kenyan citizen, which he admits. Even later, he became an Indonesian citizen, according to his Indonesian public school records.
The man was BORN with divided allegiance. A “foreigner”, per the SCOTUS definition. Therefore, he is not a natural born citizen. While he is at present a citizen of the USA (one would hope), he is not a natural born citizen, as required by the Constitution. At best, he is a naturalized citizen. Like Arnold Schwarzenegger, who similarly is ineligible for the presidency.
Another ruling by the SCOTUS, also obfuscated by Justia, touched upon the meaning of subject to its jurisdiction, meaning that a person was born into and subject to the jurisdiction of the USA. As explained by Donofrio, emphasis added:
The Slaughter-House Cases citations were tampered [with] along with Minor in Snowden v. Hughes, and this is very important. [Justia CEO] Tim Stanley’s claim that this was all an innocent code error is further strained considering that 8 of the 9 justices from Minor v. Happersett decided the Slaughter-House Cases where the Court stated:
“The phrase, ‘subject to its jurisdiction’ was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.”
So, again: Obama is not eligible because he is the child of a foreign citizen/subject ( whether or not he was born in Hawaii). As such, he was not born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States of America. Instead, he was born a British subject. He is a natural born British subject.
After Donofrio noted and wrote about the cauterization, the website Justia suspiciously added code to their webpages to prevent anyone from viewing certain prior versions of their site on the Internet Archive (The WayBack Machine). They have now apparently blocked from view prior permutations of all of their webpages. Wikipedia explains how it’s done:
If a site owner wishes to give instructions to web robots they must place a text file called robots.txt in the root of the web site hierarchy … A robots.txt file on a website will function as a request that specified robots ignore specified files or directories in their search. This might be, for example, out of a preference for privacy from search engine results, or the belief that the content of the selected directories might be misleading or irrelevant to the categorization of the site as a whole, or out of a desire that an application only operate on certain data.
(Or out of a desire to hide evidence!) This act alone suggests that someone became aware of having been found out and is now trying to hide the evidence. In my humble opinion.
After the story hit World Net Daily and many other websites, Tim Stanley, CEO of Justia, spoke to a reporter from CNET (an affiliate of CBS) and claimed that there was no politically oriented scrubbing going on, but instead it was a simple software coding error. Donofrio proved otherwise by posting screen shots from the Internet Archive. Since those archived pages are now no longer available to the public, nobody can go see for themselves in order to decide who’s telling the truth (but we know it’s Leo Donofrio).
It’s important to note that not only citations but also text from decisions was changed, so obviously something was up that cannot be explained by a simple coding error. The game is afoot!
Considering that there may be legal implications for this legal website, despite the disclaimer posted on their site stating that they’re not liable for “errors and omissions,” the owners of the site may still find themselves in legal jeopardy.
The CRS Memo
Certainly Congress should investigate, given that Congress relied upon a memo, prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), which MAY HAVE relied upon Justia for their research. We simply don’t know how the CRS compiled their version of case law.
They relied on Justia,
OR they, too, deliberately “scrubbed” the Minor v. Happersett case from view,
OR they’re simply very, very bad legal researchers.
If the latter is the case, then Congress needs to clean house and hire some competent legal researchers before they ever again rely on CRS advice for something this critical to the entire country: Whether or not the person in the White House is LEGALLY there.
The CRS memo was prepared specifically to advise Congress how to respond to constituents who asked WHY their representatives did nothing about Obama’s ineligibility for the presidency. The CRS memo did not mention the Minor V. Happersett decision, and it also falsely claimed that the SCOTUS had NEVER defined natural born citizen. From the memo:
Because the term “natural born Citizen” is not defined within the Constitution, nor has the Supreme Court ever needed to rule specifically on the terms in this clause, there have been questions raised from time-to-time as to the precise meaning of the qualifications clause.
How cleverly they parse. A red flag. The memo made the conclusion that Obama would be eligible (if born in Hawaii–a fact NOT in evidence).
The constitutional history and relevant case law thus indicate that one born “in” the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, that is, when one’s parents are not official diplomatic personnel representing a foreign nation in the U.S., would be considered a U.S. citizen “at birth” or “by birth,” and thus a “natural born Citizen” of the United States, regardless of the citizenship status of that individual’s parents.
As you can see, this opinion, upon which YOUR representatives relied, misinterpreted (or deliberately obfuscated) what the SCOTUS said. In the Snowden v. Hughes case, the SCOTUS clearly excluded the children of foreign citizens or subjects, in addition to the children of diplomats.
Because of that erroneous conclusion, our representatives and senators DID NOTHING as a blatant violation of the Constitution was allowed to stand. Oddly enough, these very arguments were posted by obots on many blogs before the CRS memo was ever written. Which begs the question: What relationship, if any, does the Justia website have with the politically active and connected, lawyer-heavy, Obama-supporting web forum Politijab?
It’s of note that at least one writer who wanted to believe that Justia was innocent by way of a programming error has changed his mind and printed a retraction:
Justia has been deleting politically inconvenient facts from its online Supreme Court record, which as Leo points out is actually a criminal offense: misrepresenting state documents.
It’s good to see intellectual honesty from the left, for a change.
The Players
Now let’s look at this from another angle. Let’s examine some of the players in this political game of Draw Poker (or perhaps, in Justia’s case, it’s Russian Roulette).
From the Justia website:
Tim Stanley [a.k.a. Timothy James Stanley]
Chief Executive Officer
Tim is a computer programmer, lawyer and CEO of Justia. Prior to starting Justia, he co-founded FindLaw and served as FindLaw’s CEO and Chairman. He is on the Board of Directors of Nolo and American Legal Net, and is on the Board of Trustees of Public.Resource.org. He is a member of the State Bar of California and was previously on the Executive Committee of the State Bar’s Law Practice Management and Technology Section. He is also a member of the American Association for Justice, American Bar Association, American Civil Liberties Union, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility [CPSR] and the Electronic Frontier Foundation [EFF]. Tim has a BS & MS from Stanford University and a JD from the University of Michigan Law School.
Tim Stanley attended Harvard Law School at the same time as Barack Hussein Obama II. Although that’s not mentioned in his company profile, above, he began law school at Harvard and finished in Michigan. His LinkedIn profile lists his educational background:
Harvard Law School 1991 – 1992
University of Michigan Law School JD 1992
Stanford University MS 1989
Stanford University BS 1986
Ann Arbor Huron High School 1982
It’s of note that Obama’s brother Mark Ndesandjo Obama attended Stanford at the same time as Tim Stanley, according to Obama’s fictional memoirs. Tim Stanley graduated in 1986, so he likely started at Stanford in 1981, around the same time that Barack Obama was at Occidental college, also in California. (Our O Timeline provides some background for events and persons in Obama’s life.) The secretive Mark Ndesandjo Obama runs a company in China called World Nexus, which sets up webpages. He wrote about GPS systems while at Emory. Thus, he shares interests with Tim Stanley, which may have put them together in the same classes at Stanford.
Tim Stanley’s Justia resume reprises the tidbit that he himself is a computer programmer:
Member, Board of Trustees, Public.Resource.Org 2009-Current
Board Member, American LegalNet Inc. 2008-Current
CEO, Justia, Inc. 2003-Current
Editor, Stanford Copyright & Fair Use Center at Stanford University 1996-Current
Board Member, Nolo 2007-2011
CEO, CTO, VP Products, FindLaw 1995-2003
Programmer, Social Science Research Network 1994-1995
INTERESTING!
We here at WTPOTUS previously wondered if Mark Ndesandjo Obama belonged to one of the first chapters of CPSR, in Palo Alto, CA. See our thread where we picked apart the CPSR, a GLOBAL organization, and its connections to many other global entities, NGO’s, “social justice” groups, and (you guessed it!) George Soros, through a very tangled web. The EFF is also supported by Soros, through his Open Society Institute and related entities such as the Tides Foundation and the Sunlight Foundation.
Now we come to Stacy Lynn Stern. From Justia:
Stacy Stern
President
Stacy Stern is President of Justia. She oversees all revenue and client operations, as well as marketing and partnerships. She provides leadership on Justia’s legal portal’s legal content and community features. Previously, she co-founded FindLaw in 1995 and was the President of that company until its acquisition by West Publishing in 2001. She is a member of the State Bar of California, Legal Marketing Association, and the American Bar Association. Stacy graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Stanford University with an AB in communication. She received her JD from Harvard Law School, where she served as an editor for the Harvard Environmental Law Review.
Coincidentally (or not), Obama graduated from Harvard Law in 1991. Stacy Stern was at Harvard in 1990 and 1991, according to her LinkedIn profile. As an editor of the Harvard Environmental Law Review, might she have personally known Obama, who (we’re told) was editor of the Harvard Law Review?
Stacy Stern attended Stanford, graduating in 1990, so she also may have known Mark Ndesandjo Obama. If she graduated in 1990, then she likely started in 1986, the same time that Mark was there. What another coincidence!
On the other hand, she might have met Mark Ndesandjo Obama through her husband. Who’s her husband?
Why, it’s Timothy Stanley! Her husband and co-founder of legal websites. It’s passing strange that so many articles about Stanley and Stern don’t mention their relationship. This is from an old article about Stern, from when she was still at FindLaw, in 2004:
Stacy Stern ’93 isn’t as famous as the Pets.com sock puppet. She never raised billions from venture capitalists or played foosball in the office during the height of the Internet boom. Yet in the annals of Silicon Valley, Stern can boast of a more impressive distinction: success.
FindLaw.com, the legal Web portal she co-founded with her husband, Tim Stanley, eight years ago, is still alive and growing. Some 3.9 million visitors log onto their Internet portal each month while once well-funded competitors like Americounsel.com are nothing more than broken links. … She arrived at Harvard Law School neither a technophile nor a savvy businesswoman. Sure, she took some classes in corporations and accounting. She even logged onto the Internet for the first time before most at Harvard Law, back in 1992. But that was more the doing of her husband, who earned engineering degrees before attending law school at the University of Michigan and Harvard. Her attention was focused more on the Environmental Law Review. … Her next Web site was a bit more practical: the Cyberspace Law Center, designed to make legal resources widely available to the public. It morphed into FindLaw, a site offering everything from free access to a century of Supreme Court decisions to continuing legal education. …
In the early years, she did all the sales, marketing and customer relations herself while Stanley focused on the technology. … The site’s focus has shifted toward marketing for law firms, providing directory listings and hosting Web sites. Last year, Stanley left FindLaw, but Stern remains as vice president. Eventually, she would like to do other things in the Internet business, but she isn’t yet sure what. “One of the neat things about the Internet is it’s constantly evolving,” she said. …”
That line about Findlaw’s competitors being “nothing more than broken links” is rather ironic, all things considered. This flattering portrait was written by another Stern, Seth Stern, a 2001 Harvard Law School graduate.
SETH STERN is a legal affairs reporter at Congressional Quarterly and has covered four Supreme Court confirmations. Seth’s articles and reviews about the court have also appeared in Slate and the Washington Post. He has been quoted about the dynamics among justices by the New York Times and Newsweek and has appeared on Fox News Channel, MSNBC and NPR.
Seth is a graduate of Harvard Law School, the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, and Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations. He lives in Chevy Chase, Maryland.
He also wrote for Christian Science Monitor in Boston and Newsday. Oddly enough (or not) he wrote about one of Tim Stanley’s interests: copyright and fair use. For CQ Weekly, he wrote about the potential for “chaos” in the 2008 election and illegal immigration.
Seth Stern co-authored a book about “liberal champion” SCOTUS Justice Brennan and also wrote about Elena Kagan’s nomination, complaining that “ideology goes too far” in the confirmation process. Oh, lookee here! Seth Stern wrote an article that we’ve looked at many times. An article lauding Obama for his history-making life!
It was as a law student that Obama first made history—and national headlines—when he was elected the first black president of the Harvard Law Review in the spring of 1990.
And as a law student, Obama met many professors and classmates who would prove helpful in his meteoric political rise from state senator to president of the United States in five years.
Each seems to have a story about how much Obama stood out.
Helpful indeed! Quite possibly very helpful indeed. If each has a story about Obama, very few of them are talking. [Update: Another article by Seth Stern quotes several class of ’91 students who knew Obama personally.]
Whether Seth Stern is any relation to Stacy Stern is not known. Yet.
Whether Seth Stern’s work for Congressional Quarterly places him in the same milieu as the CRS employees who researched the memo that misled Congress is also not known. At present.
Certainly Stern is a common name. There’s another Stern connected to Obama–Andy Stern, former SDS student radical, Teamster, and head of SEIU.
How amazingly coincidental that these Justia muckety-mucks crossed paths so many times with Barack Hussein Obama II and his half-brother Mark. To paraphrase Robert Graves,
Let all of the poisons that lurk in the MUCK, hatch out!
This article contains a very apt quote, which puts my reference into context. In Graves’s historical novel I Claudius, Roman Emperor Claudius says,
I have decided Nero should follow me so that one day the empire will revert back to the Republic, that is to some form of representative government. … I will give Rome Nero and when he is done with Rome, Rome will be done with emperors altogether. It will be bad, exceedingly bad…worse even than Caligula but they have to have the whole terrible truth about just how bad it can be before they come to their senses. Let all of the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out.
Is this how the REPUBLICANS were thinking, back in 2008? If so, then it is We the People who have had to pay for their idiocy.
See here for another thread on our blog, where we discussed the CRS memo, which was written by Jack Maskell, head of the American Law section of the Knowledge Services Group, within the CRS. As always, our comments are brilliant and on point! Be sure to read them all, but especially beginning here, because the following commentary demonstrates that even the Maskell CRS memo omitted text (with no ellipsis) that was critical to the understanding of the decision it cites.
I wonder if the names of employees of CRS are available or could be made available under the FOIA. I further wonder if CRS “outsources” some of their work. For more background, Paul Hollrah wrote a very good piece about that memo and its implications, even without mentioning the Minor v. Happersett case.
As always, a BIG hat tip to our fellow authors and our commenters and researchers, who helped behind the scenes. Renee’s begun to research various Stern families on our research blog. Go there if you wish to help her brainstorm.
Leo Donofrio wrote a new post, giving more background on Tim Stanley and how this “error” supposedly happened and why it probably did NOT happen.
UPDATE: 11/13/2011
Truly despicable sickening fraudulent fascist Orwellian bullshit.
And if we allow them to cover this up, we deserve everything that comes to us as a result thereof. Get off your ass and do something. Because this is where the story ends if you don’t… down a deep dark endless memory hole. …
[Y]ou better get off your ass, America. Do it now. Because your freedoms go only as far as the laws which uphold them. When a cabal of sniveling techno-programming nerds can change our laws, and our cases – whether that be at the NY BOE, at Justia, Cornell, Wiki and beyond – and get away with impunity, then we are done, dead and dusted.
That’s a quote from Leo Donofrio’s latest post, wherein he documents that Justia wasn’t the only website involved in scrubbing references to Minor v. Happersett. In fact, the Cornell law website was scrubbed, too. With help from Carl Malamud, who’s connected to Tim Stanley and also to John Podesta.
My sincere apologies to our crack researcher, for not getting this information into a post that made sense, before Leo published his post, which is far better than I could ever had made it, since he has access to Lexis/Nexis and understands the case law (and is smarter than I, to boot). This was the update that I promised, all about Carl Malamud. See this link for just a sample of the vast network of people and entities connected to this issue.
Bridgette
itooktheredpill
Miri
newssleuth
We the People of the United States 
Two EXCELLENT links that I cribbed from Leo’s most-excellent site. I’m passing this on and promoting all of these blogs, our comrades in blogging “arms”, so we can do our part to publicize, as best we can, exactly WHAT is going on in our Republic:
http://scottfactor.com/conservative_blog/rewriting-history-to-elect-a-dubious-future/
“It is almost inconceivable to imagine the lengths to which Obama’s handlers went to force him into the U.S. presidency. I am certain we will never know all of the dirty moves made to make certain he was installed in office. This scrubbing of Supreme Court citations is likely only the tip of the iceberg. We know that any of Obama’s past documents, from school records to passport records to pretty much any record that would tell us anything about who this man really is, have been sealed and hidden from any scrutiny. What does this America-destroying communist have to hide? Oh, pretty much everything, I imagine.”
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/?p=100899
“But that isn’t why Obama wanted McCain. Obama wanted McCain because McCain provided Obama with cover vis-a-vis Obama’s eligibility. McCain was born on a U.S. Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal zone, and thus there was a question about his eligibility per Article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution. Was McCain born on U.S. soil?
Note the question: Was McCain born ON U.S. SOIL.
A big hullabaloo was made about this, climaxing in Senate Resolution 511, co-sponsored by Senator Barack Obama himself, affirming that McCain was eligible under Article 2 Section 1. Here is that URL:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-sr511/text
Note the date: April 10, 2008. We now know that at EXACTLY the same time as these Resolution 511 thrashings were going on, Justia.com was scrubbing all mentions of Minor v. Happersett from their SCOTUS archives. Now some argue that these rulings were still available on LexisNexis and WestLaw. That’s right. But LexisNexis and WestLaw are expensive PAY services. Justia.com is the only real FREE online law library. How many Americans are going to fork out the big bucks for access time on LexisNexis or WestLaw to investigate SCOTUS precedents for the definition of “Natural Born Citizen”? Uh, you could probably count the total on one hand, and still be able to pick your nose.
Obama wanted to shift the focus from the definition of “Natural Born” and the focus on the parents to the physical location of birth as the one and only relevant factor – when it is NOT the only relevant factor. Obama was confident, having Marxist co-conspirators in Hawaii who were ready to perjure themselves with regards to his original birth certificate, that he could fake his way to proving that he was born in Hawaii. He thought that he could wave the “certificate of live birth”, which is the document generated for foreign-born children like his sister, Maya, and that this would satisfy the lapdog press. If any further questions came up, he could get a Hawaii state official to lie and say that they had “physically seen” his original long-form birth certificate, even though no such thing existed. Remember, Marxists lie, and they lie without the slightest compunction. This was no big deal and is EXACTLY what was accomplished.”
I like that line about nose-picking. Gross, but funny all the same! We need levity.
Now see this from that last link:
“Here is a quote from a Washington Post piece about McCain’s eligibility dated May 2, 2008. Emphasis mine.
But Sarah H. Duggin, an associate law professor at Catholic University who has studied the “natural born” issue in detail, said the question is “not so simple.” While she said McCain would probably prevail in a determined legal challenge to his eligibility to be president, she added that the matter can be fully resolved only by a constitutional amendment or a Supreme Court decision.“The Constitution is ambiguous,” Duggin said. “The McCain side has some really good arguments, but ultimately there has never been any real resolution of this issue. Congress cannot legislatively change the meaning of the Constitution.”
Here’s a hotlink to this WaPo citation.
That is a stone-cold lie. There HAD been a resolution in the form of a UNANIMOUS SCOTUS decision in Minor that explicitly definined NBC as a citizen born to two U.S. citizen parents.
Duggin almost certainly knew this, being a law professor who had claimed to have studied the Natural Born issue “in detail”. Duggin, like Justia.com, has some serious explaining to do, and may be staring down a sedition charge.”
Now look at the law firm that Ms. Duggin was a partner of:
http://www.law.edu/fac-staff/duggins/ http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/11034.html
There’s another so-called Constitutional law professor who probably knew the definition, too.
That’s the one that I found, and it is excellent, meaning the Gina Miller one. And it’s well written, too!
Anyway, not happy about all the people who must have put their little hands (and little minds) into this to do the coverup. So sad. It almost seems to get worse as we go along.
Oh, sorry, kittycat77. Didn’t remember it was you who linked it at Leo’s. I click the links and save them up until I have time to read them. Then I’m lucky if I remember where I found them.
It really doesn’t matter at all, but I did send it to Leo from FR. I thought it was excellent, the Gina Miller write-up.
Anyway, I wish that we could think who to write about this. That’s why I wrote after this who I had written. I think that attorneys that care about the constitution might care about this, but it’s just finding them and maybe Judge Roy Moore might know some that are kind of into truth.
You can just call me KC, as it’s easier.
What can be done, then who will listen? I sent something to Judge Roy Moore because I started thinking, he’s a real conservative and also loves true justice. And the one reason that I sent something to him on top of that, it’s obvious he must know many attorneys being as he was a judge, and it’s possible that he knows some decent ones too. Even if he’s no longer a judge, he still has contacts.
Another thing is, what if we try to contact Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely. He’s the one that is head (I think) of the Veterans Defenders group. I’m trying to figure out how to send him this stuff. Anyone have any ideas?
Now here’s an interesting coincidence for you. Seth Stern wrote a story for Bloomberg, detailing how the Justice Dept. paid $16 apiece for muffins. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-20/-extravagant-spending-16-muffins-found-at-justice-conferences.html
Now the DOJ says it was all misreported: http://mediamatters.org/blog/201110280020
While they may not have paid $16 per muffin, one wonders how much taxpayer money they wasted on preparing and distributing this report refuting the incident:
Click to access a1143.pdf
Don’t want the Republicans to have any fodder whatsoever to use against Holder and Obama. DOJ politicized? NAH!
READ IT AND WEEP, OBOTS:
Spiro Agnew, born November 9, 1918. His mother BORN IN VIRGINIA. His father, born in Greece. NATURALIZED BY Sept. 12, 1918, according to government records: his registration for WWI.
SPIRO AGNEW–NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. BORN IN THE US TO TWO U.S. CITIZEN PARENTS. Stop LYING.
Brava!!!
TY. I noticed that the obots have dragged out Spiro again. This was debunked last year or year before, but they just don’t want to believe the truth. At least, here’s a legal DOCUMENT proving that they’re full of it. I get tired of their lies and obfuscations.
I do think, however, that one obot might have a point because it does appear that Leo left off “Dred” in his reference to “Scott V. Sandford” on his blog.
There apparently are two different cases.Dred Scott v. Sandford and Scott v. Sandford. Leo links to “Dred Scott v. Sandford” but his post omitted the “Dred”. It doesn’t really matter because his POINT is the same: Justia omitted the case from, iirc, Wong Kim Ark (the favorite of the obots). The thing is, it looks like Cornell uses the two versions interchangeably. (Wish again that I were a lawyer.)http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZD.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html
I changed my comment because at this point I don’t know if there are two cases or one! The obots are quoting Wong Kim Ark to say that it was decided that anybody born in the US, even if both parents are not citizens, is subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. just by virtue of being here.
Leo’s quote did apparently come from the dissent, but it still doesn’t change his point: They omitted the citation. Do you know if he has screen shots of that? I couldn’t find them.
I have never posted here before, but would like to share a video link with you and your readers which Leo hasn’t yet posted on his site. I submitted it to him as a comment, but he seems to be slow getting comments up. Anyway, this video was uploaded by John M. Pruitt, a Justia employee (http://professionals.justia.com/profile/john-pruitt-1484795). He is filming Obama’s motorcade as it drives past the Justia office on Sept 26, 2011. Obama was headed to a nearby computer history museum. The employees are cheering and swooning. News reports indicate that Obama went to several back-to-back fund raising events while in Mt. View. Wonder who attended those events and donated to the campaign. Also wonder if Obama met with anyone from Justia.
Sept 26, 2011, Mountain View, CA
Obama drives past Justia office
Welcome, Erica! Thank you for the video. It’s VERY interesting. We’re still working on some of these connections. Trying to put it together into a narrative that makes sense. We have read your good work over on your blog. Enjoyed it very much!
What a difference between Obama and Reagan. I saw a Reagan motorcade years ago. He had the window down and was waving at everybody along the street. It was obvious which car Reagan was in.
Even these Justia tools wonder which car Barry’s in. Well, he’s so paranoid, it could be any or NONE of them. Could be like the time he bugged out on the helicopter and caught his motorcade miles away.
The more I learn about Justia, the more I believe we’ve found the source for Politijab. Jabber, jabber, jabber. Repeat the lie; repeat the lie; repeat the lie. This was NO PROGRAMMING ERROR.
http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2011/10/occupy-justiacom-impeachment-of-obama.html
By Erica. I read it before; thought somebody linked it here, but apparently we got linked to it from Leo’s blog. Great post, Erica! We’re all in this together. Plugging away. Trying to crack that ceiling.
Thank you Erica, nice to have you. Welcome.
Hi Erica,
I always have enjoyed your blog…especially the one that initially outed all of the obots who were attacking blogs. I referred many to your work.
I remember reading that he had met with Justia people during that fund raising trip to CA. I wonder if we found that information on the previous Justia research that was done when Leo first saw the problem a few months ago. I will try to find it.
Leo’s new Justia stuff is up, and Dianna Cotter has a new story up. It’s good and sounds like there’s more to come.
http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-portland/justiagate-the-cover-up-continues-1
Obots are hyping a meme that Justia is a private website, so it doesn’t matter what they have on their site. They’re not an official sources. Today, I wrote this to Renee:
The obots also keep saying that Justia says OTHER cases besides the natural born citizen cases were affected. SO THAT EXPLAINS WHY THEY BLOCKED ALL VERSIONS OF THEIR SITE IN THE WAYBACK MACHINE. They’re [possibly] rigging up “examples” of other “programming errors” on unrelated cases, so then they can LIE and hopefully diffuse the situation.
It’s like with the “birther” issue. They made up the SFCOLB to diffuse it. When that didn’t work, they made up the birth announcements to diffuse it. When that didn’t work, they made up the LFCOLB to diffuse it.
So long as they can muddy the waters, people who WANT to believe in Obama will continue to believe in him.
I believe the WayBack Machine people just might possibly help (they’re connected to Google). Somebody might do more “programming” to make those archived images look AS IF they had the same error as the NBC cases did. That’s what they may be up to.
Once they rig up their exemplars, suddenly they’ll decide to remove the block and then they will send obots out onto blogs to link back to these unrelated cases. (Another obot rationalization is that of course Justia, now that they know there are errors, doesn’t want people to see the incorrectly cited case law and quote the errors instead of the now-correct version at their site. Pshaw!)
Alternately, maybe they blocked the entire site so that people can’t go back and find exactly WHEN the few examples of non-related cases that were cited by obots back in July were modified. If not done when the NBC-related cases where modified, obviously then they created them to make it look as if it were a programming error.
That’s granting that whichever programmer made the “mistake” didn’t slyly cover his bases from the beginning. As with the passport file cauterization, when they snooped into Hillary’s and McCain’s at the same time as Obama’s, when all along, AS THE STATE DEPT. INVESTIGATION PROVED, the “target” was OBAMA’S PASSPORT FILE. To remove “embarrassing information.”
If this scrubbing of SCOTUS cases was accomplished by the same clever black ops krewe, then they would have, from the beginning, scrubbed some other non-related cases, for “plausible deniability” purposes.
However, if it were really a programming error, then EVERY case would have been in error and it would have come to light LONG BEFORE Leo found it on the NBC cases, because they would have heard FROM THEIR CUSTOMERS (who should ask for their money back).
You be the judge. Of course, this is speculation. But what makes sense and what doesn’t? If it doesn’t make sense, as Judge Judy says, it’s not true.
The only thing is that Leo, with his poker and chess mind of always thinking ahead, may have thought ahead on this one too. I surely do hope so.
Forever In My Blue Jeans Babe | Wtpotus Research Blog Renee | October 28, 2011 at 10:30 am | Reply
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dean
Renee | October 28, 2011 at 10:31 am | Reply
Dean was born in Akron, Ohio and lived in Marion, the hometown of former President Warren Harding. Thereafter, his family moved to Flossmoor, Illinois where he attended grade school through the eighth grade. For high school, he was sent off to Virginia’s Staunton Military Academy. He initially attended Colgate University but left because of bad grades. He then attended The College of Wooster in Ohio where he obtained his B.A. He received a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from the Washington College of Law at American University in 1965.[3]
[edit] Washington lawyerAfter graduation, he joined a law firm in Washington, D.C.. Having gone to prep school with the son of Barry Goldwater, he was a close friend of the senator and his family. Dean was subsequently employed as the chief minority counsel to the Republican members of the United States House Committee on the Judiciary. A National Commission on the Reform of Federal Criminal Law was created in 1967. Dean was appointed its associate director.
[edit] Joins Nixon campaign, administrationDean volunteered to write position papers on crime for Richard Nixon’s presidential campaign in 1968. The following year he became an Associate Deputy at the office of the Attorney General of the United States in the Nixon administration. In July 1970 he became counsel to the president, after the previous holder of this post John Ehrlichman became the president’s chief domestic adviser.
[edit] From “master manipulator” to star witness[edit] The start of WatergateDean, then White House Counsel, met with Jeb Magruder (Deputy Director of CREEP) and John N. Mitchell (Attorney General of the United States, and Director of CREEP) for a presentation by G. Gordon Liddy (counsel for CREEP and a former FBI agent) on January 27, 1972, in Mitchell’s office. At that time, Liddy presented a preliminary plan for intelligence gathering operations during the campaign year 1972. Reaction to Liddy’s plan was highly unfavorable; Liddy was ordered to scale down his ideas, and he presented a revised plan to the same group on February 4, which was, however, left unapproved at that stage.[4] A scaled-down plan would be approved by late March of that year. This would lead eventually to attempts to eavesdrop on the Democratic headquarters at the Watergate Complex in Washington, D.C., and to the Watergate scandal.
[edit] Linked to cover-upOn February 28, 1973, Acting FBI Director L. Patrick Gray testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding his nomination to replace J. Edgar Hoover as Director of the FBI. Armed with newspaper articles indicating the White House had possession of FBI Watergate files, the committee chairman, Sam Ervin, questioned Gray as to what he knew about the White House obtaining the files. Gray stated he had given reports to Dean, and had discussed the FBI investigation with Dean on many occasions. Gray’s nomination failed, and now Dean was directly linked to the Watergate cover-up.
White House Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman claimed that Dean was appointed by Nixon to take the lead role in coordinating the Watergate cover-up from an early stage, and that this cover-up was working very well for many months, keeping the scandal bottled up until after the 1972 elections, which were a landslide for the Republicans, with Nixon being returned for a second presidential term by a dominant margin, the second-greatest in American history, behind only Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s win over Alf Landon in 1936.[5]
[edit] Cooperates with prosecutorsOn March 23, 1973, the Watergate burglars were sentenced with stiff fines and prison time; Dean hired an attorney and began his cooperation with Watergate investigators on April 6, while continuing to work as Nixon’s Chief White House Counsel, never disclosing this obvious conflict to Nixon. On April 22, Nixon requested that Dean put together a report with everything he knew about the Watergate matter and even invited him to take a retreat to Camp David to do so.
[edit] Fired by NixonCoupled with his sense of distance from Nixon’s inner circle, “The Berlin Wall” of advisors H.R. Haldeman and John Ehrlichman, Dean sensed he was going to become the Watergate scapegoat and despite going to Camp David, he returned to Washington without having completed his report. Nixon fired Dean on April 30, the same date he also announced the resignations of Haldeman and Ehrlichman.
Dean had earlier asked Nixon for formal immunity from prosecution for any crimes he may have committed while serving as White House counsel; Nixon refused to grant this and this refusal led Dean to cooperate with the prosecutors very soon afterwards. Upon going to the prosecutors, Dean also requested immunity, which was not granted despite his many revelations.[5]
[edit] Testifies at Senate CommitteeOn June 25, 1973, Dean began his testimony before the Senate Watergate Committee, in which he implicated administration officials, including Nixon fundraiser and former Attorney General John Mitchell, Nixon and himself. He was the first administration official to accuse Nixon of direct involvement with Watergate and the resulting cover-up in press interviews. Such testimony against Nixon, while damaging to the president’s credibility, had little impact legally, as it was merely his word against Nixon’s. Nixon vigorously denied all accusations against him that he had authorized a cover-up, and Dean had no proof beyond various notes he had taken in his meetings with the president. It was not until information about secret White House tape recordings having been made by President Nixon (disclosed in testimony by Alexander Butterfield, in July 1973), the tapes subpoenaed, and analyzed, that Dean’s accusations were substantiated.
[edit] Watergate trialDean pled guilty to obstruction of justice before Watergate trial judge John Sirica on November 30, 1973. He admitted supervising payments of “hush money” to the Watergate burglars, notably E. Howard Hunt, and revealed the existence of Nixon’s enemies list. On August 2, 1974, Sirica handed down a sentence of one to four years in a minimum-security prison. However, when Dean surrendered himself as scheduled on September 3, he was diverted to the custody of U.S. Marshals, and kept instead at Fort Holabird (near Baltimore, Maryland) in a special “safe house” holding facility primarily used for witnesses against the Mafia. He spent his days in the offices of the Watergate Special Prosecutor and testifying in the trial of Watergate conspirators Mitchell, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Robert Mardian, and Kenneth Parkinson, which concluded on January 1, 1975. Dean’s lawyer moved to have his sentence reduced, and on January 8, Sirica granted the motion, adjusting Dean’s sentence to time served, which wound up being four months. With his conviction for felony offenses, Dean was disbarred as a lawyer, so could no longer practice law.
Renee | October 28, 2011 at 10:33 am | Reply
Gaming American Democracy: | John Dean | Verdict | Legal …
Oct 21, 2011 … Justia columnist and former counsel to the president John Dean … You can even argue that it’s stimulated or justified by various tactics that Democrats have used,” as those who rationalize do. … What about Justiagate? Justia …
verdict.justia.com/2011/10/21/gaming-american-democracy-3
Renee | October 31, 2011 at 12:04 pm | Reply
NOTE * JOHN DEAN*************
PolitiFact | Was McCain born in the USA?
May 12, 2008 … SUMMARY: John McCain’s birthplace has given rise to one of the … Article II of the constitution states: “No person except a natural born … said Sarah H. Duggin, an associate professor of law at Catholic … Tribe, a professor at Harvard Law School, told PolitiFact the issue is clear. …. W. Dean, Oct. 8, 2004 …
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/12/born-usa/
Scholarships, Fellowships and Financial Aid – Law and Public …
… a favorable impression. 2011 Dulin Haynes Award Recipients Blair Warner and Nicole Picard. pictured with Dean Veryl V. Miles and Director Sarah H. Duggin …
lpp.law.edu/financial-aid.cfm
NOTE PICARD***
Obama’s Birth Certificate Conspiracy SR 511 and Faithless …
Nov 24, 2008… there is certainly no precedent,” Sarah H. Duggin, an associate professor of law at Catholic University who has studied the issue extensively, …
ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2008/11/24/obamas-birth-certificate-cons
[PDF]
Governing Corporate Compliance
Boston College Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital … Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School; J.D. 1996, Harvard Law School; …. )3 See, e.g., Miriam H. Baer, Insuring Corporate Crime, 83 Inn. W. 1035, 1051, 1054 (2008); …… 129 See Sarah Helene Duggin, The McNulty Memorandum, the KPMG …
lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2423&context=bc
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20050311.html
A Fresh, Powerful Case for Amending the U.S. Constitution to Remove the “Natural Born” Qualification For the Presidency
By JOHN W. DEAN
Friday, Mar. 11, 2005
The February 2005 issue of the Boston University Law Review includes a terrific article by Sarah Helene Duggin and Mary Beth Collins, entitled “Natural Born In The USA: The Striking Unfairness and Dangerous Ambiguity of the Constitution’s Presidential Qualifications Clause and Why We Need To Fix It.”
Duggin is an assistant professor at Columbus School of Law at Catholic University; Collins is a law clerk for a judge on the Circuit Court for Allegheny County Maryland (and a recent graduate of the Columbus School of Law). Their article takes aim at the antiquated requirement, contained in Article II of the Constitution, that “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen” can be President of the United States. They lay out in detail the complexity of this simple-seeming clause, and make a compelling case that the Constitution ought to be immediately amended to remove it.
Sarah Helene Duggin
Mar 15, 2010 … Sarah is married to Kirk Renaud. Sarah and Kirk celebrated their twenty-fifth wedding anniversary last summer. They have two sons, Alex and …
womenfaculty.cua.edu/bios/SarahHeleneDuggin.cfm
Sarah Helene Duggin Director Law and Public Policy Program …
She is married to Kirk Renaud. Sarah and Kirk have two children, Alexander (age 15) and Bryant (age 13). Last reviewed: November 9, 2009. Celebrating 125 …
http://www.law.edu/fac-staff/duggins/
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kirk-renaud/13/856/a6b
Kirk Renaud
CEO at BioBrite
Location
Washington D.C. Metro Area
Industry
Biotechnology
Kirk Renaud’s Overview
Current •Director at Common Cents Solar
•President & CEO at BioBrite
Past •President at SportCount Inc.
•Sr. Consultant at McKinsey & Co.
•Project Manager at Booz Allen Hamilton
Education •Stanford University Graduate School of Business
•University Liggett School
•Williams College
Connections 89 connections
Websites•Company Website
•Company Website
•Company Website
Kirk Renaud’s Experience
Director Common Cents Solar
March 2008 – Present (3 years 8 months)
President & CEO BioBrite
January 1990 – Present (21 years 10 months)
President SportCount Inc.
February 1995 – October 2002 (7 years 9 months)
Sr. Consultant McKinsey & Co.
February 1988 – 1992 (4 years)
Project Manager Booz Allen Hamilton Public Company; 10,001+ employees; Management Consulting industry
February 1983 – 1989 (6 years)
Kirk Renaud’s Education
Stanford University Graduate School of Business MBA
1978 – 1980
University Liggett School
Williams College BA
Kirk Renaud’s Additional Information
Websites:•Company Website
•Company Website
•Company Website
Groups and Associations: Clean Economy Network – for cleantech and renewable energy business leaders Stanford Center for Social Innovation
•Sr. Consultant at McKinsey & Co.****
groSolar – Sidwell Friends School Uses Innovative Bond …
The School and Common Cents Solar are marketing “solar bonds” to parents, friends, faculty and alumni of Sidwell Friends. “Investors in the Friends Solar Fund …
http://www.grosolar.com/news/447-sidwell-friends-school-uses-innovativ
common cents solar – powered by neighborhood energy
The goal of Common Cents Solar is to facilitate solar energy projects to benefit the community and the planet. By pooling community resources, CCS can make …
http://www.commoncentssolar.org/
survey – Common Cents Solar
Ryan at ketchryan@gmail.com or fax it to Kirk Renaud at (301) 961-5943 …
http://www.commoncentssolar.org/forms/CCS_Solar_Survey.doc
Helping homeowners understand the benefits and …
Consumer’s Guide to Buying a Solar Electric System. Next up was Kirk Renaud and Ketch Ryan with Common Cents Solar, who explained how homeowners …
http://www.bethesdagreen.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=X3G85JDWUI0%3D&tabid
Solar power is money saver for Bethesda private school and …
Sep 1, 2010 … Kirk Renaud (left) and Ketch Ryan of Common Cents Solar, supporters of the Sidwell Friends Lower School in Bethesda, raised $200000 in the …
ww2.gazette.net/stories/09012010/potonew221206_32533.php
About CCS – common cents solar – powered by neighborhood energy
http://www.commoncentssolar.org/about.html
General Manager: Kirk Renaud Kirk is a seasoned business professional, with an MBA from Stanford and a BA in architecture and environmental studies. …
Kirk renaud and Ryan ketches are co partners In common sense solar
http://ww2.gazette.net/stories/09012010/potonew221206_32533.php
In addition to the economic and environmental gains, the solar installation is also a way to bringing the community together to make a difference, said Ketch Ryan, sewing teacher at Sidwell Friends Lower School and co-founder of Common Cents Solar, who spearheaded the collaboration.
ORMAN WESTON KETCHAM ’40
Orm died from cancer at his home Dec. 14, 2004. His beloved wife of 57 years, Anne Phelps Stokes “Bunty” Ketcham, was at his side.
After Polytechnic Preparatory Country Day School in Brooklyn, he followed his cousin, Jack Eadie ’36, to Princeton. He majored in history and graduated with honors. Orm was on the lacrosse team, the editorial staff of The Tiger, was manager of the Herald-Tribune sales agency, and a member of Quadrangle Club.
Orm earned a law degree from Yale Law School in 1947. He entered government service in the Foreign Operations Administration and the Department of Justice. In 1957 he became the judge of the DC Juvenile Court and, subsequently, of the DC Superior Court as well as an adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University.
During his long life of public service, he served two terms as moderator at Westmoreland Congregational United Church of Christ; vice chairman of the Chevy Chase Village Council; and belonged to the Chevy Chase and Cosmos clubs.
Survivors, in addition to Bunty, include four daughters, Ann Ketcham Felder, Ketch Ryan, Betsy Ketcham Mercogliano, and Susan Stokes Ketcham; two sons-in-law, Allie C. Felder III and Christopher Mercogliano; his life partner, Anne Casscells; and six grandchildren. To them, his classmates wish to extend their deep sympathies.
The Class of 1940
http://paw.princeton.edu/memorials/17/6/index.xml
Ms. Anne Casscells is a Managing Director and Member of Executive Committee at Aetos Capital, LLC. She is also a Co-President, Managing Director, and Chief Investment Officer of Aetos Alternatives Management LLC. Prior to joining Aetos in 2001, Ms. Casscells was the Chief Investment Officer of the Stanford Management Company, where she was responsible for the investment of over $10 billion in endowment funds and other assets on behalf of Stanford University. Prior to assuming her position as CIO in 1998, she served for two and a half years as Managing Director of Investment Policy Research, where; she was responsible for asset allocation and for the endowment’s absolute return investments. During this period, Ms. Casscells expanded the absolute return portfolio from $150 million to $650 million and developed a portable alpha program to enhance returns in the endowment’s U.S. equity and fixed income asset classes. Prior to joining the Stanford Management Company, she was a Vice President in Goldman Sachs’ fixed income division and an Analyst at Morgan Stanley. Ms. Casscells is a Trustee of the Stanford Business School Trust and a member of the Board of Directors of KQED Public Broadcasting, where she serves as Treasurer and head of the Finance Committee. She has also served as an Advisor to the Finance Committee of the David & Lucile Packard Foundation. Ms. Casscells is the Co-Author, with Robert Arnott, of two articles titled Demographics and Capital Markets Returns, Financial Analysts Journal, AIMR, Vol. 59, No. 2, March/April 2003 and Will We Retire Later and Poorer?, The Journal of Investing, Summer 2004. She is also a Co-Author, with Clifford S. Asness, of an unpublished monograph titled Comparing Apples-to-Apples the Stock Market is Expensive, April 2004. Ms. Casscells earned her Masters of Business Administration from the Stanford Graduate School of Business, where she was an Arjay Miller Scholar, and a Bachelor of Arts in British Studies, cum laude, from Yale University.
Casscells
Like Castle ? Cosell ?
hummm…;
She has also served as an Advisor to the Finance Committee of the David & Lucile Packard Foundation.
Packard ….and again…
Phelps Stokes Fund
Phelps Stokes “is America’s oldest continuously operating foundation serving the needs of African Americans, Native Americans, Africans and the rural and urban poor. Phelps Stokes is a 501(c) (3), nonprofit organization whose guiding motto is Education for Human Development. The logo, four open books, symbolizes the importance of education in promoting every aspect of human capacity building.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phelps_Stokes
Established in 1911 as the Trustees of Phelps Stokes Fund by an act of the New York State legislature and known for much of its history as the Phelps-Stokes Fund, Phelps Stokes connects emerging leaders and organizations in Africa and the Americas with resources to help them advance social and economic development. In November 2008, the organization dropped “Fund” from its name.
Among the many organizations that trace their roots to Phelps Stokes are UNCF, the Booker Washington Agricultural and Industrial Institute (BWI), the American Indian College Fund, the American Indian Higher Education Consortium, the Jackie Robinson Foundation and the Association of Black American Ambassadors.
Phelps Stokes (PS) is especially known for its contribution to education in the U.S. South and British colonial Africa. Indeed, Edward Berman writes that between 1911 and 1945, Phelps Stokes “played a role in American Negro and especially in African education disproportionate to the rather meagre financial resources it contributed directly to these endeavors between 1911, when it was incorporated, and 1945. The Fund’s [Phelps Stokes’] endowment of slightly less than $1 million was small when compared with other philanthropic organizations established early in the twentieth century.
Phelps Stokes Foundation
The fund was “for the education of Negroes both in Africa and the United States”.
Phelps stokes foundation was asked in 1977 by USAID to run a schlorship program which allowed southern Africans to study at American Universities. http://phelpsstokes.org/PAFE/History
The Jackie Robinson Foundation
http://wtpotusresearchblog.wordpress.com/2011/05/17/theres-something-about-jackie-robinson-part-6/
Miri, Leza and I have worked this alot before across the hall;
Phelps Dodge – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Phelps Dodge Corporation was an American mining company founded in 1834 by Anson Greene Phelps and William Earle Dodge, Sr.. On March 19, 2007, …
History – Expansion and acquisition – Environmental record – Notes
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phelps_Dodge
Kirk went to Stamford with Tim Stanley ?
Annie Ketchum Dunning (Nellie Grahame)
She was born November 2, 1831, in New York City, to Hiram (1792-1870) and Anne Dow Ketchum (1802-1885). [1] Appleton’s describes her father, an attorney, …
readseries.com/auth-dm/dunning-bio4.htm
DCNR honors its own as employees’ work is recognized – July 3 …
Jul 3, 2007 … Anne E. Ketchum, for her leadership roles in four components of DCNR’s land conservation strategy (land acquisition investment guideline, …
http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/news/resource/res2007/07-0703-dcnrawards.a...
Edwards – Stories, Listed by Author
Lovely Anne Ketchum, (ss) Bananas Feb 1980. EDWARDS, PAT (chron.) * Accident? Suicide? or Murder, (ar) Argosy Sep 1963. EDWARDS, PATRICIA ANN …
http://www.philsp.com/homeville/fmi/s954.htm
But it seems all tied to Globinization and energy
Susan K. Stokes is a Renewable Energy Insurance and Risk Management professional with a wealth of Renewable Energy expertise.· Susan created and headed up the Marsh & McClellan Renewable Energy Initiative in the Americas.·
http://ibsgreen.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&id=45&layout=blog&Itemid=63
Susan c. Stokes
Click to access Stokes_GlobalizationLeft.pdf
Left out the Ketchum part of her name ?
Susan K. Stokes
http://business.highbeam.com/410503/article-1G1-165361002/news
Scottish Resources Group, the parent company of Scotland’s largest coal producer, Scottish Coal, has appointed Bruce Laird managing director of Scottish Biofuel, the group’s energy crop and wood fuel supply business. Laird joins the company after a lengthy career in the renewable energy sector working for companies such as Dalkia, Siemens, and Scottish and Southern Energy.
Risk and insurance service company Marsh has established a dedicated renewable energy team and named Susan Stokes and Tom Sexton (pictured) as its leaders. The team will work with the firm’s global marine and energy practice and the power and utilities industry practice to help clients address the
Wind power
Marsh Expands Services With New Renewable Energy Team
in News Departments > FYI
by NAW Staff on Wednesday 23 May 2007
Marsh Inc., a global risk and insurance service firm, has formed a renewable energy team. The new group, which will work closely with the firm’s global marine and energy practice and the power and utilities industry practice, will help clients address risks associated with developing clean energy.
In addition, the firm has named Susan K. Stokes and Tom Sexton as the group’s co-leaders. Stokes, who is based at Marsh’s New York headquarters, will be responsible for the renewable energy team in the U.S. Sexton, who is based in London, will be responsible for the firm’s renewable energy group in Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Africa, the company says.
“The creation of Marsh’s renewable energy team provides both a framework as well as dedicated resources from multiple practices to expand our efforts to help clients address emerging risk issues in this dynamic sector,” comments Stokes.
http://www.nawindpower.com/naw/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.791
Marsh & Mclennan : Marsh Establishes Renewable Energy Team, Reinforcing Energy Leadership Position
?Businesses and governments have sharpened their focus on renewable energy, particularly as the energy industry responds to the global emphasis on developing new technologies that lower carbon emissions,? said Ms. Stokes. ?The creation of Marsh’s Renewable Energy Team provides both a framework as well as dedicated resources from multiple practices to expand our efforts to help clients address emerging risk issues in this dynamic sector.?
http://www.4-traders.com/MARSH-MCLENNAN-COMPANIE-13573/news/MARSH-MCLENNAN-Marsh-Establishes-Renewable-Energy-Team-Reinforcing-Energy-Leadership-Position-366475/
Judge Oman Weston Ketchem
That’s where All the names came from and all the ties to
Anne
Ketch, Ryan and Timothy Stanley with the Common Cents Solar
Alli — co-op hall of famer ?
And……..
“Susan KETCHUM Stokes”. ..
KETCHUM**
Princeton Alumni Weekly: Orman Weston Ketcham
Feb 23, 2005 … Orman Weston Ketcham ’40 … In 1957 he became the judge of the DC Juvenile Court and, subsequently, of the DC Superior Court as well as …
paw.princeton.edu/memorials/17/6/index.xml
Trinity College School – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Trinity College School was first founded in the town of Weston, Ontario. William A. Johnson (founder) officially opened the school in his home on May 1, 1865. …
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_College_School
This is going all over the place Miri.
This Ketchum name goes to alot of places and spellings I will post on the research link.
An update on Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case posse: https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/sheriff-joe-to-investigate-obamas-forged-birth-certificate/comment-page-1/#comment-65742 Seems appropriate to this thread, too. Why else did they scrub the cases?