If the SCOTUS Investigation IDs the Culprit …

will We the People learn who leaked a SCOTUS draft ruling about abortion?

Let’s guess.


Not unless they can pin this “unprecedented” leak of a draft SCOTUS opinion on one of the so-called “conservative” justices or a member of their staff. (Let’s guess: If the leak came from a conservative source, would the source have leaked to Politico?)

If, as is more likely, the draft was leaked from the camp of the “progressive” justices, then we’ll never learn the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

They covered (so far) for the culprits who stole the election from President Trump.

They covered (so far) for the Deep State, the media, and Clinton minions who conspired against President Trump.

They covered for Hillary Clinton’s email scandals.

They covered for Hunter Biden regarding his “laptop from hell,” which at least arguably implicates his father. By covering up the truth, they protected Biden at a crucial point in the election.

They covered for Obama and his sketchy lack of documentation of eligibility. No court, including the SCOTUS, has ever required Obama to prove his eligibility for the presidency. That, in itself, was yet another way to cover up the truth.

The list goes on and on.

So don’t hold your breath while hoping that the SCOTUS leak culprit is identified and has, at the very least, his or her career ruined, as promised by Justice Scalia.

Real repercussions will happen only to a conservative.

“Progressives” will, as always, be protected.

It goes without saying, but I’ll say it anyway: the culprit will be protected especially if a member of a “protected class.”



69 responses to “If the SCOTUS Investigation IDs the Culprit …

  1. There’s much to say about this but I don’t have much time today. Suffice it to say that it’s VERY suspicious that the leak happens on the eve of the release of the movie PROVING THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN. EVIDENCE provided. You know, that EVIDENCE the media always claims is lacking. More considerations:

    The ruling wouldn’t have come out until July, if not conveniently leaked. Thus, the DemoncRATS can now use it from now until Nov. to pump up their base and turnout, in the face of the predicted Red Wave for mid-terms.

    Rather suspicious that the usual “peaceful protesters” were ready to go, complete with signs and a slogan (“we won’t go back”) on the same day as the leak.

    Leak happened on the eve of several crucial primaries. (Good news: The REAL POTUS is 55 and 0 on his endorsements, after these primaries. Nobody Trump endorsed has lost so far. https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/endorsement-primary-jd-vance-ohio/2022/05/04/id/1068466/ )

    Biden and other progressive officials were ready with statements decrying the SCOTUS, attacking the institution, calling for violence (see Newsom), and not ONE of them decried the LEAK. The unprecedented and traitorous leak. Biden, in particular, was careful to say that this ruling proves the need to elect more DemoncRATS in Nov. Transparent much?

    Here’s one honest liberal (can we really call him that now?) who decries the leak:

  2. Talk about a leak. You simply cannot make this stuff up:


    “Congress is demanding answers from the Biden administration following a disclosure that reams of biometric data abandoned by the United States during its bungled withdrawal from Afghanistan are being used by the Taliban to target American allies still stuck in the war-torn nation.

    Eight Republican senators led by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (Tenn.) are asking the State and Defense Departments to turn over information related to the evacuation of U.S. troops in Afghanistan that allowed the Taliban to retake control of the country. In addition to leaving behind $7 billion worth of military hardware, the United States abandoned “sensitive data, including biometric data,” on Afghan allies that are now reportedly being used by the Taliban to target those who supported the United States’ 20-year war in the country.

    “These systems, which were abandoned when the U.S. military withdrew from Afghanistan, contained iris scans, fingerprints, photographs, occupational data, home addresses, and names of relatives,” the senators wrote, according to a copy of the letter obtained exclusively by the Washington Free Beacon. “The Taliban is using this personal information to increase targeted killings, torture, and forced disappearances of Afghans who helped the United States.” The senators warned that “the Taliban will continue to target the vulnerable with equipment and information that the Biden Administration left behind.” …”

    Nothing will come of any of these investigations unless Republicans gain power in Congress and maybe not even then, based upon their past record of RINOism.

  3. https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-abortion-ruling-leaked-163049000.html

    More from Turley. He writes,

    “Justice Sonya Sotomayor surprised many court watchers in December during the oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization when she complained about the “stench” of politics pervading the case over abortion rights. …”

    One must wonder now whether Sotomayor will be as ready to complain about this leak. Have ANY of the justices opined yet, or do they have to refrain because of the “ongoing investigation,” which probably isn’t even happening. Who thinks Wray and Garland will be on it like police dogs?

    Turley hit upon several other reasons why suspicion should fall on the progressives:

    “There is no obvious reason to leak other than to unleash outside pressure on the court and to try to push Congress to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act to codify Roe v. Wade.

    If that was the purpose, it seems quickly realized as figures like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., used the leak to call for not just the passage of the federal law but for killing the filibuster as well: “Congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe v. Wade as the law of the land in this country NOW. And if there aren’t 60 votes in the Senate to do it, and there are not, we must end the filibuster to pass it with 50 votes.” …”

    Thank God, Sinema and Manchin have already put the kibosh on that last wish about the filibuster. And don’t forget: They want to pack the court, especially if it looks as if they’re going to lose Congress and/or the Presidency.

  4. New York Attorney General Letitia James describes how She >>>>>
    Proudly Walked into a Planned Parenthood for her ABORT-ion ???

    New York Attorney General Letitia James called a press conference Tuesday and describes how she “proudly” walked into Planned Parenthood to abort her child. Good for her, we guess.


    • I guess the “transitioners” proudly walk in to get their opposite gender hormones, too. WTF?!! A woman (?) actually admits to being proud of killing her unborn child? We are doomed. Sodom and Gomorrah.

  5. Federal DEBT >>> UP $2.65 Trillion Since Biden’s Inauguration

    The federal debt has INcreased by $2,650,725,664,597.74
    Since Joe BLOW the WAD $$$ was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2021, according to the official numbers published by the U.S. Treasury.


    • But Joe prefers to talk about the deficit, not the DEBT. btw, how the hell can there be a budget deficit when there’s not been a budget since before Barry was installed?


    HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra dodges question about ‘Grotesque’
    S E X <<>> Change Surgeries for >>>> Children !!!!!!
    ‘We’re navigating into territory that we’ve never done before as a government,’ Braun warned


    • Have you been tuning in? I watched a bit of it and I’m glad I’m not on that jury because when you’re dealing with two actors, it’s hard to decide which is telling the truth. Guess it all depends upon which is the better actor. Her testimony sounded very, very rehearsed. “I remember …; I remember …; I remember …” Too much like NLP.

    • I saw a lot of crocodile tears, too. The camera doesn’t lie.

    • That’s an excellent article.

        • This is simply all of a piece of denying womanhood. We have “transgender women,” now. Abortion is part of the progressive notion that womanhood is something that’s “lesser” and so must be eliminated in order to have “equality” with men, partially because, in their minds, being female makes one subservient to the laws of nature. Females carry and bear young. This isn’t “fair” in their minds, because they can’t be sexually free like males. They still believe this even though there’s no reason whatsoever for ANY female to become pregnant unless she either wants to or is so irresponsible as to “choose” to not prevent it.

          Of course, this excludes those rare instances where a woman is raped and who isn’t on birth control to prevent potential consequences. This is also rare because such women can get medical treatment to prevent conception so long as they seek it.

          Yeah. There are other cases, such as incest, but that’s also rare, isn’t it? (Plus it’s a crime as is rape, so if all of these crimes were found out and prosecuted, we’d know about all these exceptions.) There’s also sexual bondage, such as we see in Muslim cultures–also illegal.

          Making women “victims” of their biology is of a piece with the MISOGYNY that’s actually behind the progressive view of a “need” for or “right to” abortion.

          If they’re female, they’re actually ashamed of being so, angry at having been born female, because they don’t EMBRACE being female, they see it as being less, born VICTIMS, almost like being born black (in their racist opinion).

          So they’re both racist and sexist, believing blacks and females are born handicapped and need to be protected, as if being female is a disability.

          But they discount AGENCY. Women can’t be responsible, in their minds, and shouldn’t be made to BE responsible and accept the consequences of their choices or irresponsibility.

          Of course, women CAN BE reponsible, especially in the 21st century where no woman has to GET pregnant if she doesn’t want to.

          Notice the sheer number of LESBIANS who are pro-“choice” activists. Same with gay and “transgender” men. At the root, they HATE females and womanhood.

          That’s MY OPINION and I’m sticking to it.

    • Oh, thanks. I posted a link I found above, before I read your comments. If one link doesn’t work, we can try the others. 🙂

    • Hmm. I don’t hear ANY OF THESE “leftists” judges DENYING it or even DECRYING it. Do you? That speaks volumes.

      What leftists are saying, falsely and without evidence, is that it’s not a crime.

      But walking into the Capitol on Jan. 6 was “obstruction”? What is this if not obstruction and OF JUSTICE?

      Bill Barr, disappointment that he is, says it’s criminal. But, of course, Biden’s DOJ and FBI are NOT going to investigate.

    • What was and still is destructive to our entire nation is giving people positions BECAUSE of their skin color or ethnicity, sex, or whatever characteristic they have other than being white and male. It was destructive to the court to put a dunce like Sotomayor on the SCOTUS in the first place. This is the result. The progressive choices for justices were POLITICAL AND PARTISAN CHOICES, and so now we have a partisan and political court.

    • https://www.floppingaces.net/2022/05/09/the-supreme-court-leak-and-protests-are-jan-6-all-over-again-and-should-be-treated-the-same/

      “The Supreme Court leaker should be found, arrested and put into solitary confinement immediately, and so should every one of the those persons protesting outside the Supreme Court and at the homes of the conservative justices. The absence of outrage at the Court leak is astonishing. …”

      So I read today that Nina Totenberg at NPR, who lied about the alleged argument between Sotomayor and Gorsuch, claims it was probably a conservative clerk who leaked to POLITICO. Yeah, that makes sense. Because conservatives have contacts at POLITICO. Right.

      The “absence of outrage” about the leak is what you call a TELL and the fact that Totenberg, who obviously is pals with somebody on Sotomayor’s staff, is trying to divert attention by claiming it’s the going “THEORY” (!!!) that it was a conservative and that’s another TELL.

      Her contacts at SCOTUS are NO DOUBT on the progressive side, because why would a conservative at SCOTUS be pals with and leak to TOTENBERG of NPR? Nope, she’s pals with the progressive left.

      SO then how would her progressive pals at SCOTUS know? Why would a conservative clerk at the SCOTUS tell a progressive member of the SCOTUS staff or a progressive NPR reporter anything, especially if he or she leaked such confidential document? They wouldn’t.

      But THEORIES can be bandied about anywhere and by anybody and Totenberg’s THEORY has as much legitimacy as 51 so-called former intelligence community experts claiming, WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, that the Biden laptop was “Russian disinformation.”

      It’s a tell and she’s deliberately deflecting to protect the actual leaker. It’s a non-story because she has NO EVIDENCE whatsoever to make such a claim.

  7. Election Whore$ of the Democrat Party …. YEP …. SO BE IT!

    Amazon’s 2000 Mules book review States:

    THE FIX WAS IN … WATCH IT .. & SWEAR U DON’T > SEE’ > IT!!! ?!

    The 2020 Presidential Election was rife with FRAUD… orchestrated by
    THE > Democratic Party. That’s NOT just an Accusation; it’s now, Thanks to bestselling author & investigative journalist Dinesh D’Souza, an established fact. With Eyewitness testimony & the pinpoint precision & analytic sophistication of the forensic technique of geo- tracking, D’Souza demonstrates how an already corrupt system put in place by Democratic Party Hacks & “community organizers” was taken over & supercharged by national-level operatives to produce Massive Voter FRAUD !!!!!!!!!


    • This was brilliant but it’s a road map for the cheaters to learn how not to get caught. For example, they’ll all use burner phones from now on and they won’t be bringing ping-able devices on their ballot stuffing runs. Don’t know how they’ll get around the videos on the drop boxes, but they’ll probably find a way. Shoot out the cameras or bribe, if necessary, the elections officials to “lose” the video. AS IF in these locations they’d have to bribe them, because in those areas the elections officials are all in on it, are all leftists, and are all for the cheating, if it’s against Republicans.


    2000 Mules Preview – Release May 2022



    Hunter Biden enlists Hollywood Mega-Lawyer for counsel & funding, sources say …..O’ REALLY ??????


    • Everyone committing a federal crime and yet not one arrested, much less jailed for alleged insurrection for over a year without due process.

  10. ….. MULES …

    * salvatore repper ….. ??? facts? below???
    Regarding lack of video footage of the same mule at different boxes; from what I have seen of interviews with the film makers & investigators, they had a Difficult time obtaining the footage from government Sources. THE footage that they DID receive, was “Selected” from the GOVernment entities; they did not get everything the entities had, they only got what the government wanted to give them, & it took the government along time to Turn Over Footage that was requested. Is it possible that the government Went through Video Footage, & Omitted any footage that showed the Same person at Different drop Boxes? Personally, after viewing all of the nonsense that went on with the 2020 election, ALL of the “dissapearing” of election records, the removal of rules & laws that were in place to ensure election security, I certainly think it is possible that the government Combed through the footage, assuring NO… footage was presented that showed mules making drops at different boxes. ….?????

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s