Rep. King Calls for Wider Investigations

Following is a transcript of comments made by U.S. Representative Steve King (R, Iowa) to the Judiciary Committee in support of “wider investigations of [the] Obama, Clinton, Comey, Soros, Lynch, Abedin, and Weiner Scandals.” Unsurprisingly, King’s comments and his call for further investigations into the Obama administration did not receive much exposure in the mainstream media last week. King’s speech is well worth watching at the link, or you can read the transcript below. [Emphasis added.]

Mr. Chairman, listening to this debate, it strikes me that there’s a few things that have been left out of this discussion, and I do support the gentleman from Florida’s amendment and I follow the ideology of this and the process.

One of the things I would say to that is that as I listen to the gentleman from Tennessee address this subject matter, and raise his voice pretty strongly about the allegations of Obama versus Russians, versus Putin, I would make a couple of points on this: One is, it’s pretty clear that the Obama administration sent their people over to Israel to work against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, pretty much openly, significant dollars invested in that campaign over there.

The President of the United States, with at least the moral support of the people that had worked for him in the country of Israel, seeking to shift the results of the election against the seated Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, then the gentleman [someone tries to get King to yield. He says, “No, I won’t yield; I have a lot of things I must say but thank you.” King continues …]

Then the gentleman did object to U.S. tax dollars being used. I just came back not that long ago from the Balkans, where I sat in a place like Macedonia, and there I learned that the United States government, borrowing money from China and Saudi Arabia, had handed over somewhere at least five million dollars in contracts transferred through USAID into George Soros organizations that were used to manipulate elections in the Balkans; and that’s just particularly Macedonia, not including the neighboring countries that are there.

And some of that money was used to translate Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” into Macedonian, to distribute the books, and the rules for radicals and the actions of radicals were manifested within the election efforts in that part of the world.

So I would say that the Obama administration is a long ways from clean on this as far as being involved in elections in other countries, not to mention little comments like the British “if you vote Brexit you’re going to have to go to the back of the queue,” so that’s the taxpayer dollars piece of this; but the long string that we should be looking at with this investigation and special counsel that is our request here, it goes a long ways back–it goes clear back to Huma Abedin, Anthony Weiner, 650,000 emails, which we still have access to.

And the question that was answered to us by James Comey, which is: “There was nothing to see there. We did a fast software search of 650,000 emails and in the case of Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner, sharing laptop and sharing emails, there was nothing new in 650,000 emails.”

And what we’ve done in this Congress so far is just taken his word for that. Now it seemed fairly logical to take his word at the time until you examine the investigation that he conducted of Hillary Clinton–oh, by the way, it was a “matter”–the investigation that had Cheryl Mills, her chief of staff, as her chief counsel in the room with Hillary Clinton, and both of them had a plea bargain of some kind–they’re exempted from prosecution for some, by limited terms–but in any case, when you have this chief of staff who is a subject of investigation, too, there as counsel to the person who is the subject of the investigation, and we ask under oath, and I ask these questions of  Comey, er, of Loretta Lynch and Comey under oath, and that is:

“Where’s the copy of the transcript? Where’s the audio files? Where’s the video files? Who was in the room?”

We don’t have the answers to any of that except:

“No, there was no, there were no, if there were notes taken, we don’t know whose they are or where they are; if there was any transcript of the deposition, then that doesn’t exist either, neither do the tapes of either audio or video.”

This is what looks like on its face is a sham investigation, plus they destroyed a tremendous amount of information, at least 30,000 emails, crushed hard drives, bought BleachBit, hired outside contractors to scrub the emails up, and we’re to take James Comey’s word for this that there wasn’t enough substance there to bring a prosecution, even though on a year ago, July 5th, James Comey delivered 15 minutes of the summary of a prosecution that was completely convincing to me until it got down to the last couple sentences of that presentation, which is:

“Well, we can’t prove intent.”

Well, curiously, there’s no requirement for intent in the two statutes that appear to have been violated.

And furthermore, I look back in the records to the previous October and the previous April, Barack Obama stated into the, into the news media record, he said Hillary Clinton would never “intend” to put our national security at risk; Hillary Clinton would never “intend” to harm America’s security.

That’s October and April, the previous October and April. Well, James Comey latched onto that word, intend, and they made up new law and gave Hillary Clinton an exemption for this lack of intent that they said they couldn’t prove, which is absolutely proven by the facts that he delivered to us in the summary that day and that there is evidence for.

And I would go on: Not only does this trail lead through Hillary Clinton and James Comey, but the Loretta Lynch component of this as well.

When you put this in place and you look at the example of them [Lynch and Bill Clinton] on the tarmac, it’s hard to imagine they sat there for 38 minutes and discussed grandchildren. I think that might even be singular, grandchild at the time, we should check that. But the answers that we got from Loretta Lynch were far less than satisfying.

And then that brings me to Alexandra Chalupa, who went off as a–she was a DNC contractor–who went off over to Ukraine to try to gather dirt on the, on the Trump people, so bringing this around Mr. Chairman, I’ll conclude it with this as my time will soon run out and that is this:

That the trail leads, I believe, also to Barack Obama.

We need to investigate all of them.

Indeed we do. We the People demand that the corruption so evident in the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign be fully revealed and, if necessary prosecuted, so that such politicization of the government of the United States will never happen again.

This simply cannot stand.


136 responses to “Rep. King Calls for Wider Investigations

    Investigate Former Attorney General Lynch
    Read the full text of the petition
    GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION118,026 Signatures


    Receive the latest news, updates, and contribution opportunities from ACLJ.

  2. HA …the JIG …. HAS TURNED ….a SHIFT in the WIND BAGS..

    THAT a WAY ..>>>> HILLARY BILL <<< L LYNCH <<<< HOLDER!!!

  3. Are they going to investigate everyone who ever called a Senator to persuade them to vote in favor of their stance?

  4. More Witch Hunts!! 👿

  5. News of the week.

  6. ~ ridgerunner •
    Would someone unmask Obama? We still don’t know who he is.
    He continues to reside in DC so he can hold the line on Swamp blackmail. Right, Jeff?

    ~ Midway ridgerunner •
    Obama’s administration up to it’s eyeballs in scandals & no one is interested. Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Valerie Jarret, James Comey, Hillary & her staff, Sheryl Mills, Uma Abeddin, Lois Lerner, Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, John Podesta, James Clapper, John Brennan, Ben Rhodes & so many more.

    ~ ridgerunner Midway •
    It’s madness. Great comment. …..^^^^^^ YEP it IS!!

  7. ~ TheAhmedClockCompany •

    any, ANY
    firings without pensions ?
    arrests ?
    charges, indictments ?
    trials ?
    convictions ?
    sentences ?
    the swamp is only a few turdles short of a full cesspool.

    It took Sessions 7 months to get up the courage to say he was investigating leakers. ….. He will never do anything about this.

    ~ clarioncaller •
    Samantha Power, aka Mrs. Cass Sunnstein, ….. is a card-carrying communist just like her former boss. The entire Obama WH swore an oath to Saul Alinsky to overthrow our Constitutional Republic and to overwhelm all our institutions vis-a-vis the ‘Cloward and Piven’ formula. But they only did what they were told by their Deep State/NWO globalist handlers.

    …. what the people allow what will continue …

    ~ TruthSerum •
    Sleazy Samantha Powers and Susan Rice are both Obama hacks who would have NO problem lying for him. We all know “It was the video” Benghazi Rice has already done so on many occasions.

    These are the type of people Obama surrounded himself with – HE is the President who demanded total loyalty. (Not Trump like the hate-Trump Fake media want us to believe)

    • I’ll believe in the “hot water” they’re in when I see some steam. Is it really just a bunch of smoke? These guys act as if it’s not an existential threat to our Republic to ALLOW these people to get away with what they’ve done. This is like something Stalin or Chavez did. It cannot stand. It simply cannot.

      (I’d forgotten who her husband is. Amazing, but no surprise.)


      ““Opposition by some in the intelligence agencies who were very connected to the Obama and Clinton teams was strong. After Trump was elected, they decided they were going to ruin his presidency by picking them off one by one.” … The sources told Fox News that surveillance of the Trump campaign began before Trump became the Republican presidential nominee July 19, and the surveillance had nothing to do with Russia, Housley said.”

      And that’s exactly what they’re doing.

    • Yes, and then you read the article at American Thinker about how McMaster has KEPT ON Obama’s and Ben Rhodes’s STAFFERS. They’re still there, so WHO do you think is leaking?

    • We really ought to help Bernie, you know? Nothing better than to wedge open that split in the liberal “party.” If Trump doesn’t deliver or if, heaven forbid, the Deep State manages to oust him, one way or the other, then We the People are going to have to create a People’s Party. Yeah, I know, it sounds Maoist or commie or something, but we’re going to HAVE TO GO third party because the only way, maybe, to win is to throw ALL THE BUMS out.

  8. The French media have started calling Macron “Jupiter,” a reference to
    the mythological king of the Roman gods & what is perceived as the president’s superior attitude after he upended France’s political landscape & shot from relative obscurity to the nation’s top post at age 39. ^^^^^^

  9. I think Barack Hussien Obama and Lee Harvey Oswald have a great deal in common.
    Both have been thought of as the prime movers in their villany.
    I don’t think I any longer believe that.
    If I am asked could any average person with a rifle with a telescopic
    sight successfully assasinate someone in a moving convoy but the shooter
    has no previous training. He is not a military sniper. I would say no. Maybe
    given twenty or thirty shots with the convoy taking no evasive action,
    and then conveniently someone else kills him, so everybody just needs
    to move along, nothing to see here.
    If I am asked to believe that some ex-president is orchestrating the hundreds of deeply buried leaks against President Trump, I think not.
    i think more likely that the Obama guy, whatever his real name was,
    is a captured servant of a deeply buried organization.
    My guess is he was offered the charms and he said yeah.
    I think you have a chance to renounce and escape the charms but
    the Obama guy was having none of that. He was having fun.
    So now he is a captured soul just parading across the stage as the guy
    that gives the real villians something called plausable deniability.
    His only function may be to take the heat if it is decided (by the unseen deciders) to take out the President.
    The Obama guy might not even realize how expendible he is,
    but he is expendible.
    You have to wonder how the deep operatives manage to orchestrate murder and suicide.
    There is a useful plant, scopollamine, grows in Colombia South America.
    It removes a person’s will power making the person into an obedient slave.
    Might not be that at all, maybe the plant gets primative jokes at happy hour.
    But the Obama guy is not the prime mover of all of this, nor is alleged
    witch Clinton.
    These are useful idiots.

    • Cyril Wechte blew this wide open back in the day and he hasn’t backed down to this day.

      Wecht poked holes in the commission’s findings during a 1965 meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. He has spent 48 years explaining how Specter’s “conclusion” fails, and with it the commission’s finding that Oswald acted alone in Dallas.

      “It was an American conspiracy,” Wecht said. “It was a coup d’etat.”

      Saturday, Nov. 16, 2013, 10:14 p.m.

  10. This has to stop. Look at these parents.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s