© Bridgette WTPOTUS 2011
Immigration Documents Tell a Tale!
Inconsistencies and downright lies are found in Barack Hussein Obama Sr.’s Immigration Files. Who is responsible for adding documents to the FOIA files? Does the receiver of the files know who sent them to her? Was a letter enclosed with the documents? How far up in the government hierarchy does this conspiracy go?
It has been found that some information doesn’t jibe with one of the dated, Memos to the File, that was in the packet of 55 pages of Immigration documents for Barack’s alleged father.
Page 5 is shown below of Barack Hussein Obama’s Immigration File, Alien Number A 11 938 537, that was received by Heather Smathers, Arizona Independent, in an FOIA request from the government. It is a very heavily redacted page, but some information shows this page to be falsely construed to lend credence to Barack Obama Jr.’s background of being born in Hawaii.
The reference in the memo is only suggestive of the child belonging to BO Sr.; it is not validated by the name of a child. We are led to believe who it is because of whose file this is. The referenced paragraph is:
“Today in talking to [redacted] I learned that [redacted] of the Harvard[written not typed] Center of African studies informed [redacted] that Obama has two wives as well as a child in Honolulu. Despite that knowledge[redacted] still went to Nairobi to visit Obama.”
Yes, it looks like an official memo, except we don’t know if E. Golden was an official from the Immigration Service nor what office/location he worked in. From this sentence we assume that E. Golden was employed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (I&N) “I told [redacted] I&N Service was concerned about what appeared to be her daughter’s lack of knowledge of the alien’s marital status.” The acronym SII after Golden’s name seems to indicate either his title or the office. A specific government office designation or use of the initials SII was not found among 40 listings where it is used. The closest description was “special investigative inquiry,” yet that doesn’t fit in the way it is used in the memo.
Where is the back-up memo of the telephone call Mr. Golden had with “Rev. Mr.” Klotzle of the Universalist-Unitarian Committee? Mr. Golden writes a memo of this telephone call with the mother of an unknown woman who flew to Nairobi to be near Barack Obama Sr., but did not write one when he learned that Barack Obama Sr. was a bigamist and had a child in Honolulu? Would the Hotel Salisbury have records of an unknown American tourist staying at their hotel during the month of August, 1964? With a huge case load, are we to believe that Mr. Golden remembered a week later how to spell Klotzle and also knew his agency affiliation yet misspelled Barack?
“I found out from Rev. Mr. Klotzle of Universalist-Unitarian Committee last week that BARAK Obama has two wives — one in Africa and one in Honolulu. Mr. Kotzle is not impressed with Obama.”
On page 24 of the Immigration documents, Rev. Klotzle, is identified as Dana E. Klotzle, Associate Director, Unitarian Universalist Service Committee, Inc. He appears to be a legitimate person, but unfortunately because he is deceased, he is unavailable to comment on any recollections he might have. (1916 – 1972). I found several references to him, but his title was director not associate director as stated in the memo.
Coincidentally, records pertaining to the Dana Earl Klotzle and the Unitarian
Universalist Service Committee are held in the Harvard Library archives. From their reference material, it states: “This collection contains the records of Carleton Fisher and Dana Klotzle, who were the two executive directors of the Universalist Service Committee. Fisher was director from 1947 to 1953 and Klotzle was director from 1953 to 1961.” Did Klotzle step down to lesser role when he was conferring with Mr. Golden in 1964? It certainly doesn’t appear that Mr. Golden could talk to Dana Klotzle in 1964 if he left the Universalist Service Committee in 1961. Where was he from 1961 to l965?
From 1965 – 67, Rev. Klotzle was found working with the Jordan Neighborhood House, Suffolk, Virginia. Other than a 1999 Harvard prepared website with 3 photos, the only information about the Jordan House is also archived at Harvard.
Based on the typed appearance, it does look like a typewriter was used to originally compose the memo. The inconsistent appearance of different letters suggests its use in (a) the date of August 28, 1964 where the A is above the other letters, (b) in the word daughter where a type over occurred, and (c) light and dark letters that show an inconsistent pressure was applied when typing. None of these happen when using a computer.
Next to each of the redactions is a typed (b)(6) as if they are giving a reason for eliminating the information, yet that means the sheet had to be put into a typewriter after redaction and then typed. If the redaction’s were done to complete an FOIA request, then how did they add the redaction codes? When enlarged, the (b)(6) do not look typed, but they do look like a computer font.
Please note the date of August 28, 1964. Also notice how Harvard is added to the paragraph; it is not typed like the rest of the memo. When enlarged, it appears there was another typed word underneath the H in
Harvard. Whose hen-scratching is it? It does not appear to be that of Mr. Golden.
A researcher, Alfy, at WTPOTUS found that according to Cornell University’s website for African Studies where they compiled a complete listing of universities where African Studies were being offered, Harvard University did not offer courses in that discipline until 1969. It clearly states this information:
The Harvard University Committee on African Studies (verified: 7/12/2002)
The Harvard University Committee on African Studies began in 1969 as an interdisciplinary group of scholars appointed by the Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences to coordinate teaching and research and advance knowledge and understanding of Africa within Harvard.
Below is a screen shot of the paragraph quoted above. It can be viewed in full at the following link. In case, they want to scrub the information, I do have a screen shot of it. Click to enlarge.
So you tell me, or better yet, let the government tell us how E. Golden could talk to someone in Harvard’s African Study Department FIVE YEARS BEFORE the department was created? The logical answer is they can’t! Why did Golden document that he had spoken with Rev. Dana Klotzle when it appears he left the Unitarian Universalist Service Committee THREE YEARS PRIOR? How were redaction codes added to this document? This isn’t a case of misspeak, this is a case of a criminal cover-up and intentionally falsifying information. This is a deliberate attempt to mislead and create a background by using Barack Obama Sr.’s immigration records to back up the usurper’s claim to having been born in Hawaii.
Lies, Scandals, Patronage, Bribery, Corruption, Power, and Greed describe this administration to a tee. Everyone surrounding this administration walks a crooked line. The time for investigation and prosecution is now, not tomorrow. Government officials have proven their complicity by being unwilling to do what is necessary.
The controversy and issues keep opening the doors to more and more criminal behavior through the use of amateur forgeries like Obama’s birth certificate, photo-shopped photographs, fraudulent testimonials, manufactured histories, bribed family members, blackmailed associates, fawning media, and now doctored immigration files. When will it end? Which thing will be the final straw? Who isn’t afraid to “embarrass” this pResident and expose the corruption? Mr. Trump got the ball rolling, and then quit. Who will take his place? We are waiting for that patriotic hero.
What other discrepancies will be found in these documents?
By the way Lamestream Media,
“It Ain’t Over Until Somebody Sings!”
UPDATE: FOIA REDACTIONS:
When redacting documents, THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT MUST NEVER BE ALTERED. Instead, a photocopy of the original document should be redacted. The amount of information, and the appropriate exemption, MUST be indicated on the responsive document.
(b)(6) EXEMPTION 6:
Personal Information Affecting an Individual’s Privacy.
This exemption permits the government to withhold all information about individuals in “personnel and medical files and similar files” when the disclosure of such information ” would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” This exemption cannot be invoked to withhold from a requester information pertaining to the requester.