Here We Go – Impeachment 2.0

The Democrats are going to meet today to decide on impeaching President Trump, with a statement by House Speaker Pelosi to follow.

Impeachment. Not over the Russian collusion/obstruction fiasco but, this time, over a “whistleblower” complaint that is based upon hearsay. A complaint that nobody in Congress has even seen. A complaint that has already been determined by Department of Justice lawyers to not fall under the law concerning intelligence community whistleblowers, simply because the person who made the complaint is not complaining about anyone within the intelligence community and the person the complaint allegedly concerns is not under the purview of the intelligence community.

If, as the Democrats seem to believe without evidence, the complaint involves President Trump, it would be good to note that the intelligence community exists to provide information to the president. The intelligence community does not exist to oversee the president, nor does the Congress. The intelligence community answers to the president, not the other way around. Nor do our spies exist to spy on our president!

It is beyond dangerous for people who wield the awesome power of our intelligence agencies to turn that power on a duly elected president.

Consider that someone has spied upon President Trump in order to report back to partisans so they can further an illicit coup against him, and by extension, upon the People of the United States. There is the real high crime.

This is what is going on, with the help of the complicit media. The same media that scoffs at President Trump and constantly claim that what President Trump says is said “without evidence.”

Where’s their evidence for this alleged high crime and misdemeanor? Why did they even report a story about which there is no evidence? No named accuser?

Just as with Justice Kavanaugh, Democrat members of the House (and Senate, and Republican anti-Trumpers, too) want to move directly to punishment before there’s even a credible allegation of wrongdoing.

What exactly is the charge?

No due process. No evidence. No sworn-under-oath-with-penalty-of-perjury witness accounts.

Not even an identified accuser.

In our system of justice, the accused is allowed to confront the witnesses against him. Who exactly are the witnesses, so that we may vet their credibility?

The complaint is based upon gossip allegedly heard by an anonymous person allegedly working in the intelligence community (note: this includes contractors, such as Fusion GPS), second-hand from another anonymous person allegedly with knowledge of what was allegedly said.

Sounds like grounds for impeachment to me.

Upon this shaky foundation, the Democrats presume to build an impeachment case against the duly elected President of the United States, despite that a majority of the people oppose impeachment and despite that President Trump’s poll numbers are increasing even as this new fake news narrative plays out.

Based upon this flimsy foundation, everyone of them who supports the impeachment of the President, with no evidence, should themselves be removed from office. They’re a disgrace to our country and to our system of government.

They have lost their minds.

Now comes word that the President intends to release the transcript of his conversation with the head of Ukraine’s government, all because the conversation is allegedly the source of the Democrats’ (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) concern.

This could be a huge mistake, because it undermines the office of the presidency. The contents of a president’s conversations with foreign leaders is privileged information. The Constitution does not give Congress the power or the authority to micromanage a president’s handling of foreign policy.

They’re not the president’s overseers. They’re not his nannies. They’re not his teachers. They’re not his bosses. They’re not his parents. They don’t get to review and approve or disapprove how he does his job.

Members of Congress have their own jobs to do, which they’re not currently doing, in their never-ending quest to oust a duly elected president.

Does President Trump have the constitutional authority to oversee and micromanage everything the Congress does or does not do? Can President Trump demand to see, for example, transcripts of every conversation Adam Schiff has in the course of allegedly doing his job?

I’m not alone in saying that I’m sick and tired of this dangerous game the Democrats are playing, all because they want to cover up for corruption in the Obama administration and because they didn’t win the 2016 election.

A president has to be able to have confidential conversations with foreign leaders, in order to ensure national security and to see that the laws and the Constitution of the United States are faithfully followed.

What foreign leader will henceforth want to speak openly and honestly with President Trump (or any subsequent president) knowing that all it takes is an unfounded hearsay allegation by anonymous partisans and a complicit media pile-on to have their confidences exposed to the world press?

But then again, maybe that’s the goal. The Democrats have never accepted President Trump as their president, so they’re doing everything in their power to undermine his presidency by preventing him from being able to do his job. One of the President’s main jobs is to oversee foreign relations.

If President Trump releases this conversation, then they will want more. They will want his next conversation, and the next, and the next. They will want all his past conversations.

If the President releases this conversation, then at the same time he should release every transcript of every conversation that President Obama had with any foreign leader.

It’s only fair. What’s good for Republican presidents should be good for Democrat presidents.

This is a precedent that should apply to all presidents.

Let the revelations begin.


122 responses to “Here We Go – Impeachment 2.0

  1. Greta Thunberg …….. Swedish climate change activist ??? REALLY ?
    she is BORN January 3, 2003 Capricorn (December 22 – January 19)
    CAPRICORN TRAITS …O’ “please … let WTP …count the WAYS .. ha’
    >Strengths: Responsible, disciplined, self-control, good managers
    Weaknesses: Know-it-all, unforgiving, condescending, expecting the worst
    Capricorn likes: Family, tradition, music, understated status, quality craftsmanship
    Capricorn dislikes: Almost >> everything at some point !!! … REALLY???
    Capricorn is a sign that represents time and responsibility, and its representatives are traditional and often very serious by nature. These individuals possess an inner state of independence that enables significant progress both in their personal and professional lives. They are Masters of self-control and have the Ability to lead the way, make solid and realistic plans, and Manage many people who work for them at any time. They will learn from their mistakes and get to the top based solely on their experience and expertise. ….OR NOT!!! ….

    Those who are befuddled and beleaguered by climate nonsense look to Greta Thunberg as if she were another Joan of Arc. Those of us who live
    in reality see her as being hopelessly mired in the arrogance of untruth. Yes, Greta’s childhood has been stolen from her, but it isn’t America that’s done that – it’s her parents who have allowed her to be prostituted in this manner. It is the leftist politicians and their ilk who are milking her youth and gullibility and her hunger for acceptance who have stuck her up on a tilting pedestal. I’m as uncomfortable watching her as I am seeing a parent mistreat a child in public. Humiliation is coming at her like a locomotive and no one is yanking her off the tracks.

    • I look at that little girl and wonder how in the world she can walk around with that scowl on her face. Is life really that horrid for her, having lived the privileged life she has? Is this all a result of the guilt trip she and her parents have over being white and rich? Being a progressive must be like incrementally committing suicide.

  2. Rep. Adam Schiff acknowledged on Thursday that he made up parts of the Ukraine phone call transcript when he delivered his opening statement at a much-watched TV hearing with the U.S. top intelligence officer.

    Mr. Schiff, California Democrat and chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said his reading was “part in parody”––but made the admission only after Rep. Mike Turner, Ohio Republican, called him out.

    In his opening statement, Mr. Schiff said Mr. Trump asked Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky for fabricated dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden and said Mr. Trump threatened to make the same request Mr. Zelensky eight times–––both quotes not in the transcript.

    • To him, it IS funny. Just look at the constant “possum eating sh**” grin on his face. He can’t get over himself for pulling off this coup, at least so far. Since the “impeachment” is NOT REAL, then he sees no reason to follow anything other than the rules of political clown show.

  3. De Blasio’s NYC bans use of words ‘illegal alien’ said supposedly in ‘hate’
    REALLY ….R U NUTS??? …YES U R …. !!!
    It’s now against the law in New York City to threaten someone with a call to immigration authorities or refer to them as an “illegal alien” when motivated by hate.

    The restrictions — violations of which are punishable by fines of up to $250,000 per offense — are outlined in a 29-page directive released by City Hall’s Commission on Human Rights.

    “‘Alien’ — used in many laws to refer to a ‘noncitizen’ person — is a term that may carry negative connotations and dehumanize immigrants, marking them as ‘other,'” reads one passage of the memo. “The use of certain language, including ‘illegal alien’ and ‘illegals,’ with the intent to demean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons constitutes discrimination.”

  4. ….. WTP ….R CALLING U OUT!!! …WITH ALL YOUR S H I T !!!
    Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) on Friday introduced a motion to condemn and censure House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) for performing a fabricated conversation between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during his opening statement at a panel hearing Thursday morning.
    “During yesterday’s hearing, Chairman Schiff’s opening statement included a blatantly false retelling of President Trump’s conversation with the Ukrainian president. Democrats previously initiated an impeachment inquiry, which leads to one of the most serious, constitutional duties of Members of Congress: removal of the President of the United States,” Biggs, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “Through this process, if the President has committed high crimes or misdemeanors, Congress may overturn the election of the President and the will of the American people. It is therefore inexcusable to toy with the process and mislead the American public with such a statement.”

    …HUNTER .. & DADDY …how SAD!!! ….the JOKE is ON U ‘all

  6. gettin’SWAMPed BIDEN’ that slick nude dick of a creep 24/7 ..Hi Jill???

    Area Man Regrets Helping Turn Joe Biden Into a Meme…A former ‘Onion’ editor wishes his publication HAD …> Gone Harder at Diamond Joe. <

    • But it really doesn’t matter. Crimes can only be committed by Republicans or conservatives or deplorables or white males or police officers.

      What about those DemoncRAT congressbums who went over to Ukraine, including Schiff, recently? Weren’t they INTERFERING IN FOREIGN POLICY? Weren’t they breaking the Logan Act?

      “The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States. The intent behind the Act is to prevent unauthorized negotiations from undermining the government’s position.[2] The Act was passed following George Logan’s unauthorized negotiations with France in 1798, and was signed into law by President John Adams on January 30, 1799. The Act was amended in 1994, changing the penalty for violation from “fined $5,000” to “fined under this title”; this appears to be the only amendment to the Act.[2] Violation of the Logan Act is a felony. …”

      IMPEACH THEM!!!!

  7. NO END ~ 2 them SWAMP KEEPERS …

  8. ~ >>> Trump: The Man Who Had All the LUCK …. !
    And now, Nancy Pelosi and her Democrats come through for him again.

    & the FILTHY PACK …of WOLVES …. R shrinking?
    O’ …so very SAD & such a WASTE of our TIME & MONEY? SICK-O’s

    • I was pondering ancient Rome yesterday, wondering how people could actually go to events where their fellow human beings fight to the death and then watch and cheer those gruesome deaths. Then it occurred to me that the spectators were the elites and the gladiators the scum of the Roman world, aka their “deplorables.” Have you any doubt that today’s current crop of “progressives” would cheer at a spectacle where “deplorables” that they’ve locked up in gulags for reeducation might be given an opportunity of freedom should they agree to fight to the death for their entertainment? A few years ago, I would have said that could never happen in the USA. Now I’m not so sure.


  10. ~ I don’t give a flying F who Oprah wants to be president. She’s the one
    who inflicted Obama on us. Thanks, but no thanks, Oprah. Now kindly shut up and go away. bob iger ??? o’ sure …okra!

    12 deaths from vaping, 6,300 deaths from transgender puberty-blocker drug?
    1 person said he was doing it 4 ..5 years… so who thinks that’s COOL???

    • Wow. Did NOT know about even one death from that but … Wow. Amazing facts. So freaking unnecessary and sad, too. Well, DemoncRATS would probably say they’re just collateral damage in the pursuit of progress and “gender equality.”

      As for vaping, ALL THIS even as state after state rushes to legalize marijuana under the BS guise of it being “medical.” Make no mistake. The goal is to legalize it completely, incrementally, as progressives do everything. Camel’s nose under the tent and voila! The whole freaking camel sitting on your face. What do you think are the statistics on the number of people killed by DUI marijuana? Medical or otherwise? It’s massive. There were two I read about just this past week, in my state, where both medical and recreational are still illegal. How many people die every year in states where marijuana is made legal? Now most of the vaping deaths involve THC, but even so. They’re banning (just like that, instantaneously) the flavoring put in the vapor and one company is voluntarily not advertising. HOWEVER, note there’s no similar rush to rethink “medical” marijuana or recreational use, either. Why is that? Follow the money and to hell with the people who die as a consequence of encountering stoned drivers. What’s next? MAM–mothers against marijuana?

    • All that said, I’m really puzzled by WHY the “Left and the mainstream media” want to ban vaping. What is their skin in that particular game? I don’t get it. I can understand the tobacco industry, but why the left? And here the same Left and mainstream media seem all on board with legalized marijuana, whether as medicine or just for fun, despite the increase in deaths. WHY? It makes no sense to me.

    • Whatever happened to the Hippocratic Oath that requires doctors to “first do no harm?” Giving CHILDREN a DANGEROUS drug (instead of relatively harmless counseling) for no reason other than to indulge their DELUSION of being another sex seems to more than violate that oath. Let the lawsuits begin, huh? It’s coming. The day will come when you’ll see ads on broadcast TV shows, mostly repeats of 1970s programs, where the announcer will intone “Did you or anyone you know get harmed by taking a drug to block puberty? Call our law firm, where we’ll fight to get you what you deserve.” Similarly, the day will soon come where not only the providers of “medical” marijuana or recreactional marijuana will be sued BUT ALSO the states (We the Taxpayers) by people harmed as a result of the legalization of the drug, which is NOT harmless. DUI, sure. That will happen. But the drug itself has many known side effects that are dangerous for people to use. None of this is considered in the rush to legalize, which I suspect is part of this “reform of the justice system.” Once marijuana is legalized, then hot on the heels comes the arguments to release from prison everyone convicted of using or selling it when it was illegal, as if breaking the law (whatever the law is) is of no consequence.

    • Ha,ha. Which explains why Shifty wants to STOP any investigation ASAP. His rear end, too. We can only hope and pray that Barr is REALLY doing his job and so is Durham and that sooner rather than later there will be some movement on draining this swamp. OUR COUNTRY DEPENDS UPON IT.

      • By Paul Joseph Watson | INFOWARS.COM Monday, Sept. 30, 2019

        President Trump suggested in a tweet that Rep. Adam Schiff should be arrested for treason for faking a transcript of Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian President.

        “Rep. Adam Schiff illegally made up a FAKE & terrible statement, pretended it to be mine as the most important part of my call to the Ukrainian President, and read it aloud to Congress and the American people. It bore NO relationship to what I said on the call. Arrest for Treason?” tweeted Trump.
        ~ Donald J. Trump

        Rep. Adam Schiff illegally made up a FAKE & terrible statement, pretended it to be mine as the most important part of my call to the Ukrainian President, and read it aloud to Congress and the American people. It bore NO relationship to what I said on the call. Arrest for Treason?

        Trump is referring to an incident during a committee hearing last week when Schiff performed a made up conversation between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to make it look as though Trump had offered Zelensky a quid pro quo deal.

        After inventing and acting out lengthy fake dialogue between Trump and Zelensky, Schiff concluded, “This is in sum and character what the president was trying to communicate.”

        Elsewhere in his barrage of morning tweeting, the President savaged the credibility of the whistleblower complaint against him.

        • It’s not only Schiff but even so-called “pro-Trump” Fox News reporters like Ed Henry, who repeatedly said Trump asked the Ukrainian president to “dig up dirt on” Biden. This is what Schiff and the other DemoncRATS said he asked but he asked NOTHING OF THE SORT. This, however, is exactly what Clinton and others asked foreigners to do to Trump, which they KNOW is going to come out soon. This is all to create a false equivalency. They acted corruptly; Trump is, as required by his oath, investigating their corruption. The newest lie is that Trump said he’s looking for and going to out the whistleblower when, rightfully so and We the People EXPECT AND DEMAND IT, he’s trying to find the SPIES within the WH who FED information to the so-called “whistleblower.” The problem is and has been from the beginning that there are traitors in the WH inner circle. The POTUS SHOULD HAVE FOUND A WAY FROM THE BEGINNING TO SHUT THEM DOWN. They should have been rooted out and long before now PUNISHED publicly to discourage other leakers. These are FELONIES being committed and yet the complicit media seem fine with COLLUDING WITH FELONS to gather ill-gotten information. Laughably, they accuse POTUS of exposing classified information when that’s EXACTLY what THEY do and he’s the only person on the planet who is empowered by the Constitution to classify, declassify, or reveal information at will.


    More “jokes” and parody, no doubt. A SNL “comedian” makes an analogy to Lincoln’s assassination because, in his opinion, it’s taking to long to “fire” President Trump. I hope the Secret Service is educating this guy right now about what’s funny and what’s not funny.

    What makes the likes of this comedian think that HE and his ilk get to “fire” the president that WE elected? He obviously didn’t participate in Trump’s success, but that’s our system. The winner gets the job. The only people who can “fire” him are We the People, collectively, by our votes in Nov. 2020.

    Is it coincidence that one of the guys whose name has been put forward as possibly being the “whistleblower” was a CIA assassin? None of this is funny AT ALL. Best case, this is all just political theater and dirty tricks. There are degrees of worst case: soft coup, trying to get Trump to resign a la Nixon, conspiracy to overthrow the legitimately elected president. And what if it’s the latter and that doesn’t work? Do they have a final “insurance policy” because they obviously seem so very, very desperate at the moment. Pray for our President.

  12. QUICK .. SEND $$ MONEY ..the HORSE$HOE’ .. NEEDS a “NET”
    1 tripped OVER 1 FLEW …. O’ so less than ABORTED BABIES!

  13. WOW …..PETER spells IT … OUT …. HUNTER & Daddy ….ha’
    Hunter got Paided $83,000 a MONTH? .. 4 WHAT??? 4 ZERO …?
    JUST 2 GET ….>>> access & influence …..BIG DADDY JOE !!!

  14. & ^^^ NOBODY >>>CARES …as WTP KNOW! … & >> IF ‘ U ‘ <<

    Now we are supposed to think there was nothing corrupt about Hunter's appointment to the money spigot Ukrainian gas board and Joe Biden's demand that a prosecutor be fired had nothing to do with protecting his son?

    The son has been Protected all his life by Biden, why would Biden suddenly turn all neutral and full of probity, never dreaming of intersecting his son's interests with his own interest in protecting his wayward son?

    It's absurd. What we have is a classic pattern of Washington swamp corruption. Biden's the one who should be answering questions about this morass, not President Trump. This goes a long way toward explaining why Democrats are so obsessed with their 'Look! Squirrel! diversion tactics against President Trump with impeachment their long-held goal. Besides hating Trump, they'd do Anything to keep this Hunter Biden Mess away from the public.

  15. CORY just close the HATCH it’s time …loser 1brndown

  16. ?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1179040126032367616&

    That’s telling them. It’s amazing (or perhaps not) that in their zeal to FALSELY accuse the President of committing crimes, they arguably commit crimes of their own. Intimidation of government employees by trying to trick them into breaking records laws, trying to deprive them of their constitutional rights, threatening them with bogus obstruction charges, all ARGUABLY could be the basis of a “whistleblower complaint” AGAINST the members of these House committees. Why not? This is far better evidence than second and third hand HEARSAY.

    • Gee, it’s AS IF this lawyer has NO CLUE about the First Amendment and exactly WHY it’s in the CONSTITUTION. It’s there particularly to protect political speech. She should be disbarred. Some “whistleblower” ought to file a complaint against her at the bar association and use THIS as evidence. It’s a lot better than hearsay. Straight from the camel’s mouth.

  17. sucker punch-ER ..YEP!!! FULL ON ….80′ year old “BITCH MOVES”
    Easily confused with a punch defined as a “bitch move” a true sucker punch is quite a bit more complex than a simple unannounced attack. MISSY ” P – U ”
    Financial status …that makes HER O’ SO SPECIAL? OLD FARTS 4 SURE!
    The nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) estimated in 2009 that Pelosi’s average net worth was US$58,436,537, ranking her 13th among 25 wealthiest members of Congress.[243] In 2014, CRP reported Pelosi’s average net worth in 2014 was US$101,273,023 having ranked 8th out of 25 wealthiest members of Congress.[244] Business Insider reported that Pelosi’s worth was $26.4 million in 2012 and made her the 13th richest members of Congress.[1] In 2014, Roll Call estimated that Pelosi’s net worth was 29.35 million, ranking her the 15th wealthiest member of Congress.[245]

    Roll Call said Pelosi’s earnings are connected to her husband’s heavy investments in stocks that include “Apple, Comcast, Facebook, Shutterfly and Walt Disney”.[245] Roll Call reported that the Pelosis have $13.46 million in liabilities including mortgages on seven properties.[245] According to Roll Call, Pelosi and her husband hold properties “worth at least $14.65 million, including a St. Helena vineyard in Napa Valley worth at least $5 million, and commercial real estate in San Francisco.”[245] ……PAUL “P”

  18. So little time .. As the SICK .. drum TOGETHER … some new thoughts

  19. WOW …… OK sounds GREAT!

    RUN RANDY RUN ….. BUTT’ 1st WTP …need 2 LOCK that DICK UP!

  20. like that WORD > …”IRONCLAD” .. so what R WTP missing with shiffy? ……2016 OBAMA’s DIRT …

  21. MO’ TRASH BUTT’ of course always a shit-LOAD READY 2 DUMP!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s