Putin Weighs in on Comey

Recently Russian President Vladimir Putin opined about the ongoing saga of former FBI Director James Comey’s mendacity: [emphasis added]

“It looks weird when the chief of a security agency records his conversation with the commander-in-chief and then hands it over to media via his friend,” Putin was quoted by Russia’s Tass. “This is strange. What is the difference then between the FBI director and Mr. Snowden? He is not a head of the special services, but a human rights activist.” …

“I am not familiar in detail with the testimony given by former FBI director Comey,” Putin said during a question and answer session with citizens. “Again, he gave no evidence of this (Russian meddling).”

What Did Candidate Clinton Know, and When Did She Know It?

In January of 2016, when Hillary  Clinton was a private citizen, persons in her presidential campaign coordinated with a group of people, one of whom was in contact with the Chinese ambassador, who wanted

to have an informal, private, off the record get together with a few of us to discuss the next year and the current state of US-China affairs. He asked me to host a social meal at my house in the next month. He was fairly insistent and indicated that he wanted to pass along some perspectives. [emphasis added to quotes]

Attacking the Messenger; Ignoring the Message

The mainstream media, the Democrat Party, the erstwhile losing Clinton campaign, and progressives everywhere are still hyperventilating about the Russians allegedly interfering in the 2016 election. There’s no proof, of course, and this is not an opinion shared by all of our intelligence agencies. The FBI, for instance, does not agree on Russia’s alleged motive, even if Russia were behind the hacks of the DNC and John Podesta’s email. As might be expected after all this brouhaha, the CIA apparently now denies the entire scenario.

Has Another Little Dictator Finally Met Her Waterloo?

With the news that the FBI has reopened its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails, and the further news that the Clinton Foundation is under investigation for “pay to play” activities, too, has candidate Clinton finally met her Waterloo?

Madre Dearest

How fitting that Hillary Clinton’s campaign minions, people at the Clinton Foundation, and possibly even CNN reporters refer to Hillary as Madre. After all, the woman wants to run everybody’s life, as if every other human being on the planet is too stupid, “deplorable,” or “irredeemable” to be trusted with any decision, no matter how minuscule.  She wants to be our mother, you see, but forever–she never wants us to grow up. We’ll be in her nest for all time. Hillary, the mother from Hell.

Yo, Mama!

Arrogant Leftist Elitists Hate Us

Peggy Noonan has explained, in a nutshell, why people still support Donald Trump (whether she knows it or not). Writing about the leaked Clinton emails, Noonan said, [emphasis added to quotes]

The big fact of the week, however, has to do with these words: They don’t like us. The Democrats, progressives and left-liberals who have been embarrassed by the latest WikiLeaks dump really hate conservatives, or nonleftists. They don’t like half the people of the country they seek to control! They look at that half with disdain and disrespect. Their disdain is not new — “bitter clingers,” “basket of deplorables.” But here it’s so unashamed and eager to express itself. …

We Must Be the Can Openers! (Open Thread)

By  Bridgette

We Must be the Can Openers…

Because the Media Won’t!

Once again, we have so many things happening  in the U.S. and the world that it is overwhelming.  When this happens, we are well aware something very important is being hidden and not reported by the media.   Usually,  these events are related to the corrupt Obama Administration, the Democrats,  and the  radical left that supports, aids, and hides their corrupt activities.

The Drip, Drip, Drip of Wikileaks

Posted by Bridgette

Important Cable Releases by Wikileaks

Days 1 – 6

The Drip, Drip, Drip of Wikileaks

This is a  composite of the most important  information that was released by Wikileaks to various news outlets.  This references  Days  1 – 6  by the UK’s Guardian. Of the reported 250,000 downloaded cables, only a fraction have been released.   These serve as insight into our government’s relationships with other countries.   They also may permanently damage our image throughout the world, highlight our inability to maintain our secret documents, and otherwise inhibit a trusting relationship with many countries.   This doesn’t  cover the danger that those who divulged their opinions  ” in secret”  may now face in the countries they represent.

An Inconvenient Wikileak

by Miri

A very inconvenient Wikileak was reported by the UK’s online newspaper, the Guardian:  The Obama administration instructed diplomats to gather information about other countries to identify leverage to use against them during climate change treaty negotiations.  In other words, this president employs Chicago thug politics not only here in the US–to unfairly win elections, to strong arm the People’s  representatives into ramming through legislation to transform America into his idea of a communist utopia, and to threaten bankers and auto companies–he also exports these same tactics overseas, in order to arm-twist representatives of other countries, to “nudge” them to vote the way he wants.  Get in line or else! 

Who is Really Behind the Document Leaks?

By Bridgette

Is it This Man?

Vladimir Putin, Russia's Prime Minister

 

Coming on the heals of Wikileaks’ document dump, and its suspiciously cherry-picked  information, especially targeting Hillary Clinton and her diplomatic spy corps,  it is noted that there was no information disparaging  Obama.    It is as though the little quips were embarrassing, but most wouldn’t cause a diplomatic incident unless those exposed were “thin skinned.”    After all, most characterizations  or suspected government activities have been written previously  by one or several journalists.   There were very few surprises in the contents of the diplomatic correspondence.