Here it comes, as predicted. Another “variant” of the COVID-19 virus. The latest fear porn from our so-called health experts, those who allegedly rely upon “the science.” Dear Leaders are now focused upon the Mu variant. Never fear, Dr. Fauci is keeping his eye on it!
Expert scientist Dr. Fauci, self-described enemy of “public health”, has provided the English language with a new word:
Fauci, (verb). Definition: fauci: to obfuscate, gaslight, prevaricate, distort, flip-flop, lie, or doublespeak–especially in a narcissistic or arrogant manner–for political or financial gain.
Use fauci in a sentence:
Biden has been in power for over 7 months, but he’s only just developed his 6-point plan?
We must hope and pray that our Constitution stands as a mighty bulwark against the type of tyrannical plans being followed in Australia and New Zealand.
We can’t possibly be lucky enough tomorrow night to hear Biden adopt the sensible, logical, science-based DeSantis model.
Fauci is in the news on another topic these days, although this topic is likely one he’d prefer to avoid.
As a result of a continued FOIA request, the progressive leftist outlet The Intercept has received 900 pages of internal documents from the National Institute of Health (NIH), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and communication with EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory. [Documents in pdf Form Here]
Within the documents, there is specific evidence of a grant to EcoHealth Alliance, run by President Peter Daszak, to screen thousands of bat samples for novel coronaviruses. Dr Anthony Fauci has repeatedly insisted that NIH funding of the Wuhan lab did not constitute “gain-of-function” research. However, within the documents there is direct evidence Fauci has lied in his claims, including to congress.
Whoops! Time to pump up the fear porn.
Not that anything will likely happen to Dr. Fauci, what with Joe Biden allegedly running the country; Congress in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer; and the Deep State controlled by enemies of President Trump and We the People–we, who are victims of them all.
The UK Daily Mail tells us that the
‘Mu’ variant is beginning to rise in America, posing a new threat during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mu was first discovered in Colombia in January, and has since been detected in 41 countries, including the U.S. and the U.K.
The strain is now starting to be found across America, and has appeared in nearly every single state in the U.S. – 49 of 50 with Nebraska being the outlier.
In total, more than 2,300 cases of the strain have been detected in America.
Scientists fear the variant could be the most dangerous to spring up yet, as it could be more contagious than the Delta variant and also be able to evade vaccines.
It also begins to reach the nation just as the Delta variant surge looks like it could be nearing its end.
That’s just coincidence, right? Mu arrives, right on cue.
Bet you didn’t get this news flash, also courtesy of the Daily Mail:
More than 300 Covid variants have been detected to date.
Three freaking hundred variants to date!?
Could these variants actually be the common cold? It seems rather obvious, contrary to what many pro-vaxxers claim, that the “unvaccinated” in the U.S. cannot possibly be responsible for the existence of 300 variants!
Has even one named COVID variant originated in this country among the unvaccinated since the vaccines were released?
Haters gonna hate.
It would be interesting to know whether any mutations are being found among the vaccinated with breakthrough cases; however, does anybody believe they would actually look for, much less report, such evidence?
This Mu variant supposedly has mutations indicating that it may evade the alleged “protection” offered by the alleged “vaccines.”
So what’s the proposed solution to the threat of Mu? More vaccinations and more boosters of the same vaccines that apparently don’t work as promised.
Makes sense. NOT! But, hey! Don’t think. Just obey.
Is this not insanity?
What’d I say? DON’T THINK!
Sharyl Attkisson is doing yeoman’s work tracking potential “concerns” about the “vaccines,” keeping her article updated with the latest developments.
The mainstream media and pro-vaxxers would likely call these concerns “conspiracy theories,” believed by idiots.
Nothing to see there folks, move on.
The latest viciousness from pro-vax haters focuses on the thoroughly reprehensible suggestion that since so many fellow citizens are “vaccine hesitant,” then perhaps unvaccinated people should simply be denied health care, denied treatment in hospitals, and shut out of society altogether.
Dr. R. M. Huffman has a message for physicians tempted to refuse treatment to the unvaccinated:
Some doctors are openly discussing refusal to treat patients who decline, for whatever reason, to get the jab. This would set a dangerous precedent and shatter fundamental tenets of medical practice. …
These are neither private thoughts nor quiet conversations with overworked colleagues: these are calls to action, shared on social media, intended for public consumption.
This should terrify you. …
A fundamental tenet of medical practice is non-maleficence, summed up in the Latin primum non nocere –first, do no harm. In televised remarks on June 2 of this year, President Joe Biden declared of the three available Covid vaccines: “The bottom line is this — I promise you: They are safe. They are safe.” …
Let me be clear: I believe vaccination is one of the most important therapeutic innovations in the history of medicine. Vaccines have saved millions upon millions of lives. That said, I also believe that the way these Covid vaccines, with their novel mechanisms of action, have been introduced to the public – as a silver bullet, idiot-if-you-decline, nail-in-the-coronavirus-coffin solution – is disingenuous, hyperbolic, and simply not justified by the existing data.
There are some indications that the vaccines may not be entirely safe to all. …
Do read the doctor’s cogent and compassionate article in its entirety.
Consider the precedent set by “doctors of medicine” who consider punishing patients for the decisions they make in their private lives concerning the integrity of their own bodies.
Dr. Huffman mentions other such decisions that individuals make that may have a direct negative impact on taxpayers, the economy, our society, and/or the health, welfare, and even survival of fellow citizens:
The disease burden of the Western world is largely predicated on bad patient habits, mainly tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and caloric overconsumption and sedentary lifestyle leading to widespread obesity (with a rate in the US of 42% and climbing). These cost the taxpayer hundreds of billions of dollars yearly, soaking up enormous resources, and – if the habits aren’t changed – will ultimately render care futile, to be temporizing measures at best.
One might counter that these behaviors don’t affect others, unlike failing to protect against a communicable disease. Ignoring the fact that Covid vaccines are non-sterilizing and aren’t proof against transmission: will we apply that standard to gay men with AIDS? To intravenous drug users with hepatitis C? To sex workers with STDs? To drunk drivers who cause fatal car wrecks? Once medical caregivers declare themselves arbiters of who deserves treatment, there exists no principle that limits such self-appointment to “but only unvaccinated Covid patients, and just for now.” It’s a horrifying prospect.
Indeed it is. And now there’s the prospect of forced vaccination. Consider that precedent.
Suppose that the powers that be decided that it’s in the best interest of society to mandate abortions for women who get pregnant with children they can’t support, because there exist many safe and effective means to prevent pregnancy of which they should have availed themselves.
Or suppose the powers that be decided “one strike and you’re out,” mandating sterilization for women who get pregnant with a second child they can’t support.
Suppose the powers that be decided to refuse health care to felons who consciously and irresponsibly broke the laws that hold our society together. Why should everyone else subsidize their health care, whether through taxpayer-funded medical care or private insurance, which spreads costs across the customer base?
The doctor’s analogy with regard to HIV and STDs is obvious. We don’t refuse treatment to those who contract these diseases despite that one can easily argue that they consciously and irresponsibly “chose” to catch the disease through sexual or drug abuse practices that made them vulnerable (e.g., refusing to use condoms or sterilized needles).
Where does it end?
An even more concerning question is: When did so many of our fellow citizens become this vicious and hateful?
Why stop at refusing health care? In for a penny, in for a pound: Why not just take the next step and propose bumping them off?
Don’t count on it.