The End? Or Next Up: Impeachment 3.0?

We’re told that the impeachment trial will end this week with an acquittal on Wednesday, after the President gives the State of the Union address Tuesday evening. But will this truly be the end? Not bloody likely.

Not according to Democrats.

Democratic-led committees in the House will keep seeking a wide range of evidence and testimony as they look into Trump’s administration, his policies and his businesses and finances. They also plan to keep a focus on his conduct in dealing with Ukraine.

Knowing the dastardly Democrats, could we expect anything less?

The Democrats have already torpedoed a great many time-honored tenets of American jurisprudence and constitutional rights, so why not destroy yet another?

No due process for President Trump.

No discovery. (Where are all transcripts from every deposition in the so-called impeachment inquiry?)

No ability to confront witnesses. (Where’s the so-called whistleblower?)

No cross-examination of witnesses.

Illegal spying on Trump’s campaign.

Use of “fruit from the poisonous tree” in the impeachment trial, the fruit being “evidence” gathered via illegitimate “subpoenas,” during an illegitimate and unconstitutional process.

Biased jurors with blatant conflicts of interest. (Multiple senators currently running for Trump’s office, yet allowed to vote to remove their political opponent from the ballot.)

Biased prosecutors with blatant conflicts of interest. (Adam Schiff, whose staff reportedly advised the so-called whistleblower and who lied about it, when asked.)

What’s next, you may ask? Let’s torpedo double jeopardy, too. Let’s have another bite at that same apple. Ukraine?

Oh, why the hell not? It’s only Trump. He doesn’t deserve fundamental constitutional rights, much less human rights, according to those who suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Let’s waste many more millions of the taxpayers’ money, too, while we’re at it.

(Isn’t it curious that John Kerry is suddenly talking about running for president? Is this to hopefully innoculate himself, like Biden, from investigation? Can we take Senator Graham at his word that he intends to investigate corruption in Ukraine during the Obama administration, including Kerry’s involvment?)

Where will this all end? One Republican has already thrown down the gauntlet:

Iowa Senator Joni Ernst warned Sunday that Republicans could immediately push to impeach Joe Biden over his work in Ukraine as vice president if he wins the White House. 

“I think this door of impeachable whatever has been opened,” Ernst said in an interview with Bloomberg News. “Joe Biden should be very careful what he’s asking for because, you know, we can have a situation where if it should ever be President Biden, that immediately, people, right the day after he would be elected would be saying, ‘Well, we’re going to impeach him.’”

And so it goes, which is why President Trump’s lawyer rightly warned,

Danger, danger, danger!

We shall see Wednesday how many Democrats (and Republicans) are serious about protecting the Constitution and our Republic or whether this will become the “new normal,” such that if any party (the “demon of faction“) should ever control a majority of the House and a supermajority of the Senate, then

nevermore will a president of the opposite party be suffered to remain in office, no matter the will of the People.

The Democrats have signaled that they will not stop. They will continue to attack President Trump by any means necessary, by any lie necessary, by any collusion with foreigners and complicit media necessary, by any fake news necessary, until they get absolute power, by any means necessary.

It’s not President Trump: It’s you they hate. You the deplorables. You who stand  in the way of their power by exercising your constitutional rights, including the right to vote.

If these dastardly people gain the power, then not one of their political opponents will be safe from the “Trump treatment,” including “enemies” they perceive on the Supreme Court.

Should Democrats gain control of the Senate, they will try to impeach Justice Kavanaugh and they will block every conservative nominee to the Supreme Court, even if it means the Supreme Court operates with years-long vacancies.   

We stand on the edge of a precipice.

Vote wisely in November.

Remember this: So far, Democrats, no matter what they ran on, have voted in lockstep against President Trump and for this unconstitutional, un-American, unethical, immoral, and despicable impeachment hoax. In lockstep.

Can We the People trust any Democrat to not do the same in the future, in the House, in the Senate, no matter what they promise during their campaign?

Vote wisely.

Our entire system of government, our very Republic, hangs in the balance.

#####

193 responses to “The End? Or Next Up: Impeachment 3.0?

  1. AOC Calls Rush Limbaugh a ‘Virulent Racist’> F’ U U hot-shot zero
    Attacks Rush Limbaugh as “virulent racist.”

    …. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez cannot stand IT.
    She wants BLACKS Back on that >>>> liberal Plantation — now.
    The Washington Times reported the story this way:
    AOC rips Rush Limbaugh as ‘virulent racist’: ‘Truly nauseating’ he was awarded Medal of Freedom

    The Times story said, in part, this: …ha’
    https://spectator.org/aoc-to-blacks-get-back-on-the-plantation/

    • What is wrong with these people? Seriously? Did you see that some of the progressives actually were happy that the Daytona driver crashed because, in their opinion, it was karma for his support of Trump? Hateful SOBs, the lot of them. MILLIONS of people love Rush and have done so for decades. WHY should AOC, because she hates him, get to be the “decider” concerning who POTUS should award the Medal of Freedom and who, in her exalted opinion, doesn’t deserve it? Did she think Barry deserved the Nobel Peace prize? One has to wonder if she EVER listened to Rush or just took every other hateful liberal’s opinion about him? I imagine she’s never heard Rush’s opinions because, mind you, the story says she didn’t attend the State of the Union in the first place. She cannot listen to anybody with whom she disagrees, apparently. Must fear cognitive dissonance so much that she cannot risk being educated by TRUTH. I love that the story points out that she’s NOT black herself. But that’s okay. They have it covered. They invented the catch-all term “people of color,” which just happens to include everybody who they decide is NOT WHITE. They also get to decide who IS WHITE and formerly white people suddenly aren’t (like Shakira and Kim Kardashian).

  2. *******************************************************
    ▀▀█▀▀░█▀▀▀▄░█░U░█░█▀▀▄▀▀█░█▀▀▀█░.█.█ ░░█░░░█▄▄▄▀░█░S░█░█░░█░░█░█▄▄▄█░ █.█
    ░░█░░░█░░░█░█░A░█░█░░█░░█░█░░░░░.█.█
    ░░█░░░█░░░█░█▄▄▄█░█░░█░░█░█░ ▄.▄
    ********* OUR GREATEST PRESIDENT EVER **********

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s