Remember This Whistleblower?

Recent circumstances call to mind the case of Jeffrey Alexander Sterling.

Jeffrey Alexander Sterling is an American lawyer and former CIA employee who was arrested, charged, and convicted of violating theEspionage Act for revealing details about Operation Merlin (covert operation to supply Iran with flawed nuclear warhead blueprints) to journalist James Risen.

Sterling was a “whistleblower” who was  arrested, tried, and convicted during the Obama administration. He was sentenced to 3 1/2 years in prison and was released in January 2018.

According to this article, Sterling worked for the CIA and first made his complaints about Operation Merlin to his CIA supervisor.

This roughly parallels the case of the so-called whistleblower who has accused President Trump of abuse of office. That person reportedly works for the CIA, too, and he first passed his complaints about Trump’s phone call to another person who then carried the complaint to a CIA lawyer for him.

Again like the anti-Trump so-called whistleblower, Sterling became impatient with perceived inaction and took his complaint directly to Congress, although Sterling chose the Senate intelligence committee instead of the House intelligence committee.

Sterling contends that he was not protected as a whistleblower:

“The first thing the CIA did was run to the attorney general and the White House” when the Ukrainian phone call whistleblower came forward, Sterling noted. “That is exactly what happened to me. I went to the Senate Intelligence Committee, and their first stop was the CIA.” …

“In their eagerness to punish someone for their embarrassment,” Sterling wrote, “they looked around for a scapegoat. They found me.” …

The article reports that Sterling was arrested and prosecuted for leaking national security secrets, and yet the current whistleblower is being defended by the “media and Congress,” despite that he may have leaked details of the President’s classified and privileged communications.

Sterling complains:

I like the attention the political leaders are giving to the concept of protecting whistleblowers. But there should be even-handed treatment for all whistleblowers. This is shedding a light on whistleblowing and the protections that are needed. But what about the others? What about Edward Snowden? What about John Kiriakou? What about me?

Sterling is right to point out the discrepancy between how he was treated by the Obama administration and how the current anti-Trump so-called whistleblower is being treated by Democrats and the media.

Sterling was punished as a felonious leaker. The current whistleblower is being protected and hailed as a patriot, even though he may have committed a felony by not owning up to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) that he had already contacted Congress.

But neither man followed the correct procedure to qualify for and obtain whistleblower protection under the law.

Since both were CIA employees, then both should have first gone through the intelligence community whistleblower system. Neither did.

The rules are clear that whistleblowers are not to go outside the protocol, especially when the complaint involves classified, top secret, or privileged information.

Neither man should have shared such information outside the intelligence community chain of command. Neither should have gone to Congress without first receiving direction from the Director of National Intelligence.

We don’t know yet the extent of the current so-called whistleblower’s breach of protocol, but we do know that Sterling should never have shared top secret information with the media.

If there’s injustice here, it’s because the current so-called whistleblower is not being treated by Trump’s administration as Sterling was treated by the Obama administration.

That the media and Congressional Democrats defend the current so-called whistleblower is more a function of their anti-Trump bias than any concern or consideration for the person himself.

Their goal, pure and simple, is impeaching the President and overturning the results of the 2016 election, thus disenfranchising more than 63 million voters, by any means necessary.

Congressional Democrats, especially the likes of Adam Schiff, may stand to lose as much as or more than the so-called whistleblower should his true identity be revealed.

We already know that the so-called whistleblower “arguably” has partisan bias, according to sworn testimony by the ICIG. Not only is the s0-called whistleblower a registered Democrat but he also, according to new reports, has or had a “working” or “professional” relationship with a current 2020 presidential candidate.

Should it be, as has been speculated, that the so-called whistleblower perhaps acted in collusion with or was used as a tool by House Democrats, their staff, their lawyers, members of the mainstream media, perhaps a yet-to-be-named 2020 presidential candidate, perhaps the ICIG, perhaps certain Dept. of State employees who deal with Ukraine, and potentially “current and former government officials,” in order to overturn the results of the 2016 election or interfere in the 2020 election, then it will become obvious why all of the above, and others, may wish to keep the identity of the so-called whistleblower secret.

His identity may be the string that unravels all, and how well do they know that!

It is incomprehensible to think that the Democrats actually intend to unilaterally impeach the duly-elected President of the United States based upon nothing more than untested allegations brought by an anonymous partisan who based his accusations on second-hand information received, allegedly, from other anonymous persons. But that’s exactly what they’re trying to do.

Drain the swamp, Mr. President!

Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out.


125 responses to “Remember This Whistleblower?

  1. WORK – in – OVERTIME! .. take a LOOK @ their HOUSE’s

  2. Here’s another Ukrainian story you just can’t make up. Have you heard about this one? I read up on the condition and it seems that it’s possible for a female with it to have early puberty BUT it’s also true that with that condition the joints don’t fuse until later, so the person appears to be younger than he or she is. In this “kid’s” case, the adoptive mother also said the “six-year-old” had a very precocious vocabulary for one so apparently young. Seems to me the known-corrupt Ukrainians found a way to unload this social expense onto unwitting Americans who would pay for the care this “child” needed. It should be easy enough to determine if the so-called biological mother really is her mother, provided she didn’t pass off the dwarf child as one who was born later.

    This one is rich. The biological mother who “ditched” the dwarf child so it wouldn’t “ruin” her life is complaining about the American adoptive parents who “ditched” her “child!”

  3. This is weird story day but this one might may you cry and laugh at the same time. God bless him and speed him to his peaceful rest and an eternity of laughter.

  4. Final “funny” story of the day. It’s not REALLY funny but it is, in its own way. Ever think or wonder why black women are disproportionately fatter? Well, you guessed it. RACISM!!! And it’s probably Trump’s fault, too.

    Isn’t that an Oprah program? I suppose racism is why Oprah is not only one of the richest women in the world but also sometimes is fat. Hmmm. How exactly does that work?

  5. You know how we always talked about the meme of “collusion” versus conspiracy, which can be a crime while collusion isn’t in the criminal terminology? Well, today’s word, today’s morphing, is going from quid pro quo to this new word that you need to start looking for. It’s a new Adam Schiff word: CONDITIONALITY! As in, this meeting (suddenly it’s the meeting and not the military aid) is something Ukrainians wanted and Trump, in Schiff’s new theory, wanted to “condition” the meeting on getting them to politically investigate (in his other words, “dig up dirt on”) his “political rival” Biden. Now military aid in return for doing something Trump “conditioned” on the investigation may or may not be a CRIME, if a quid pro quo, which is WAS NOT. However, as we know, Biden did EXACTLY THAT–he put up the quid pro quo–fire that prosecutor within the next 6 hours or we withhold a billion dollars (!!!) in aid. But now Schiff thinks he’s got Trump because, he says, Trump “conditioned” the meeting with Ukrainians on them investigating corruption!

    My guess would be that every president in the history of this nation has “conditioned” WH meetings with foreign leaders upon them doing something that we desire for the sake of our own country. I’m positive OBAMA did and is therefore “guilty” of the same behavior. Did Schiff call for Obama’s iimpeachment? How about this example? My guess is that all took place in the context of the upcoming presidential election. This is right about the time Trump declared his candidacy, iirc.

    Listen carefully to how Schiff acts AS IF the State Dept. runs foreign policy and NOT the President.


    This is OUTRAGEOUS. The FBI is STILL running “counterintelligence” operations against associates of the POTUS, including and especially Giuliani. Have they listened in on Trump’s private conversations with his LAWYER? Do they have a FISA warrant for THIS coup, too?


    A reporter asks Trump whether GIULIANI registered as a foreign agent. HOW COME nobody’s asked if Hunter Biden did?

  8. She who must be obeyed. No dunce, she, despite that the media and progressives in the UK tried to make it appear as if Johnson took advantage of her. She’s the QUEEN!

    Love it that she dressed in all her pomp and finery to say this, too. She’s the BOSS.

    • Amen Miri!

    • facebkwallflower

      The Queen set an example for us. There comes a point our Country coes before our liberal childeren’s follies that destroy our own and our countrymen’s freedom.

      • The Queen, like Trump, has her work cut out for her. It will be interesting to see what her next move is. Obviously, she was no dupe of Johnson and she wants to enact the will of the people of the UK. Parliament didn’t take her clear signal, though. They have their own Pelosi in the guise of that guy who runs Parliament. I forget his name or what his office is. It’s like Pelosi, basically the master of ceremonies but he calls the shots and there’s not much opponents can do about it. It’s a sad state of affairs that 14 or so MPs can override the will of the people AND their Queen.

  9. In the same vein, see how POTUS proves he’s no dunce and puts these lying media upstarts in their places:

    “Q Even after all you have seen — ISIS prisoners freed, all the humanitarian disaster — you don’t have any regret for giving Erdoğan the green light to invade?
    I didn’t give him a green light.

    Q Well, did you tell him to? Did he defy — [AS IF POTUS IS THE BOSS OF A NATO ALLY!]

    PRESIDENT TRUMP: That’s the same thing as you just — you know, when you make a statement like that, it’s so deceptive. Just the opposite of a green light. First of all, we had virtually no soldiers there. They were mostly gone. Just a tiny little group. And they would have been in harm’s way. You have a massive army on the other side of the border.

    But more importantly, I didn’t give him a green light. And if anybody saw the letter, which can be released very easily if you’d like — I could certainly release it — but I wrote a letter right after that conversation — a very powerful letter. There was never given a green light. They’ve been wanting to do that for years and, frankly, they’ve been fighting for many, many years.

    And when you ask a question like that, it’s very deceptive, Jon. It’s almost as deceptive as you showing all of the bombings taking place in Syria, and it turned out that the bombing that you showed on television took place in Kentucky. So, you know, and I’m not even sure that ABC apologized for that, but certainly it was a terrible thing. I’m looking at this — I say, “Wow, that’s pretty bad” — and it was in Kentucky. It wasn’t in Syria. So I don’t know what you’re going to do about that, but I think ABC owes an apology.

    Q Lindsey Graham just said of your remarks that you made in the Oval Office that if you keep talking like that, quote, “This will be a disaster worse than Obama’s decision to leave Iraq.”

    PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, Lindsey Graham would like to stay in the Middle East for the next thousand years with thousands of soldiers and fighting other people’s wars. I want to get out of the Middle East.

    I think Lindsey should focus right now on judiciary, like the Democrats — the Do-nothing Democrats, as I call them, because they’re doing nothing. They’re getting nothing done. They’re not getting USMCA done — between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. They’re getting nothing done.

    And I think Lindsey should focus on judiciary. He ought to find out about what happened with Comey, what happened with McCabe, Lisa, what happened with Peter Strzok, what happened with President Obama, what happened with Brennan. That’s what Lindsey ought to focus on. That’s what the people of South Carolina want him to focus on. The people of South Carolina don’t want us to get into a war with Turkey — a NATO member — or with Syria. Let them fight their own wars. They’ve been fighting for 1,000 years. Let them fight their own wars. The people of South Carolina want to see those troops come home. And I won an election based on that. And that’s the way it is, whether it’s good or bad. That’s the way it is.

    And if you look at this country, I’d be willing to bet anything — political instinct — that that’s what the country wants. …”

    INDEED, Mr. President. He da man!


    That is an excellent article and I hope that this means there IS HOPE that Brennan et al will soon get their just desserts. The previous article is good, too:

    Disappointing news, though. It appears that the breakthrough Boris Johnson had with the help of the Queen was thrown back today by Parliament voting to try to force Johnson to ask, once again, for a postponement of Brexit, thus, once again, proving that globalists and progressives, despite the CLEAR WILL OF THE PEOPLE, don’t give a rat’s ass about the PEOPLE or about DEMOCRACY (as they call it) or about the RULE OF LAW or about the PEOPLE holding the supreme power (although this has different meaning in the UK). Like over here, they WILL keep refusing the PEOPLE’S WILL and WILL keep asking them to vote UNTIL they vote the way the elitist, globalist, progressives want them to vote. IOW, there’s democracy and democratic will based on the People’s vote, SO LONG AS THEY VOTE THE WAY THE LIKES OF OBAMA, CLINTON, AND THEIR CRONIES ACROSS THE POND WANT THEM TO VOTE.

    What will it take? A world-wide revolution to restore REAL democracy?

  11. that DICK …Barry SOETORO…. that # 1 AMERICAN UsurpeR!

    2 Take or assume (power, a position, property, rights, etc.) & hold in possession by Force or With-OUT Rights … OBAMA!!! & MOOCHIE!

    • Ha, ha. I figured he was punking them, but in truth that was the best place for the ATTENDEES. Right by the airport. Lots of security. Each delegation had its own BUILDING! Trump was going to do it “at cost” and would have done it for FREE, if the laws would have ALLOWED him to. It makes perfect sense (not really, but in this climate it does) that no matter WHAT he did, the media would criticize him. Had he done it for free, they’d say he was currying favor and that laws require somebody to charge the going rate or else it’s a political favor/bribe, etc. Had he done it at cost, they’d STILL say he was currying favor, and then, emoluments, you know. This president will be slammed NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES. They have a meme for that, no matter WHAT he does. Attack Turkey? It’s an ally. Attack the Kurds. They’re allies. Do nothing and our troops die? He’s got blood on his hands! Fight with the Kurds and their Russian backers, he’s a puppet of Putin! This ploy with Doral really did it this time–it’s even brought out the disloyal RINOs and GOPe’ers who in kneejerk fashion began to criticize him publicly. NOW HE KNOWS who he cannot count on in a pinch.

    • OMG! I just saw his response to the Frenchman who asked why our unemployment rate is so low. HA! OMG. I love this guy.

  12. HOT AIR …..NANCY ….the hag !
    Pelosi Gaslighting Continues – False Claims: Administration
    …. “defying lawful subpoenas & document requests”…

    Nancy Pelosi continues to Mislead her ‘impeachment’ constituents. Unfortunately the Compliant Media is RE-fusing to Hold HER Accountable. House Democrat leadership has taken a climate assessment of democrat House members & Speaker Pelosi announced they will not hold a House impeachment authorization vote. As a direct & specific consequence all committee subpoenas do not carry a penalty for non-compliance.

    • It’s so funny. After weeks of testimony, she released a list of the crimes she thinks Trump committed. It consists of nothing more than the same old BS that Schiff was alleging all along. No evidence. Just a bunch of the usual innuendo and deliberate misconstruing of what Trump does or says or what his people do or say. All interpreted through their own warped perspective. NOTHING NEW. NOT ONE THING. Just like the 3+ years long Russiagate fiasco.

  13. Be forewarned
    (Although not all warnings actually happen, this one feels increasingly likely)
    Here is a new warning featured on the new Dave Hodges website about an upcoming false flag designed to make Donald Trump supporters appear to murder Antifa supporters. This is of course nothing to do with Donald Trump supporters and maybe the attempt will not even be attempted if enough people hear about it, maybe.

    By Mike Adams

    ntifa is “mobbing up” for an engineered chaos event, according to multiple eyewitness accounts of Antifa activities at public events such as Trump rallies. This coincides with accelerated mainstream media calls for Trump to be removed from power or arrested, along with an explosion in pop culture messaging that calls for Trump to be hogtied, tortured and / or executed. The coordinated messaging and accelerating George Soros funding of mob-for-hire Antifa terrorists points to an imminent event that will unleash nationwide political, civil and financial chaos from which globalists hope to remove Trump from power (or collapse the United States if Trump survives).

    This analysis is derived from multiple personal interviews, eyewitness accounts, media sources (cited below) and informed familiarity with the history of the communist playbook from which these events are unfolding. Highlights of this analysis:

    A sudden increase in the number of paid Antifa terrorists is now being observed in multiple cities across the United States.
    The increased recruitment of Antifa mobs coincides with a coordinated media campaign to incite mass violence against Trump supporters and the President himself.
    Deep state operatives such as James Clapper and John Brennan — who masterminded the criminal plot to undermine democracy and overrule the 2016 election — are now “lawyering up” as Bill Barr’s DOJ actions rapidly approach. This speaks to the desperation and urgency of the deep state to initiate mass chaos within weeks.
    To achieve their goals of a political coup, the unhinged, lawless Left needs a “spark” event to pull the trigger and flip Antifa masses into an enraged, violent mob that will unleash bloodshed on the streets of America.
    That “spark” event is likely to consist of a massive staged (theatrical) false flag event where high-level Antifa operatives dress up as patriot Trump supporters and slaughter a large number of Antifa protesters. (Charlottesville 2.0)
    Have you seen the graphic memes alledgedly posted by Comey and others calling for an assasination attempt?
    This is really creepy:

    The Pelosi bracelet – you have to see it

    The purpose of the above is to try to spark civil riots. This is a trap so if any of it happens, do not fall into the trap.

    • Everything antifa does is an “engineered chaos event.” I fully expect them to increase the chaos as the election season goes on. 1968 will look like child’s play to these terrorists. I truly do hope and pray that the POTUS knows what’s in store and that the authorities are prepared for it. I read a very interesting article yesterday, which is a head scratcher, considering the source:

      This guy ordinarily is published in Rolling Stone! Final paragraph is pertinent:

      “CIA/FBI-backed impeachment could also be a self-fulfilling prophecy. If Donald Trump thinks he’s going to be jailed upon leaving office, he’ll sooner or later figure out that his only real move is to start acting like the “dictator” MSNBC and CNN keep insisting he is. Why give up the White House and wait to be arrested, when he still has theoretical authority to send Special Forces troops rappelling through the windows of every last Russiagate/Ukrainegate leaker? That would be the endgame in a third world country, and it’s where we’re headed, unless someone calls off this craziness. Welcome to the Permanent Power Struggle. …”

      Imo, the POTUS should, in the pursuit of fulfilling his oath of office, DO arrest “every last Russiagate/Ukrainegate leaker.” This is/was nothing less than sabotage, an illegal coup to overthrow the elected president and government of the USA. It’s treason, too, because of the collusion with foreign governments. It’s not being a “dictator” to arrest and try and hopefully convict these treasonous saboteurs. It’s SAVING OUR REPUBLIC. It’s what the Founders would do. Otherwise, as even this liberal predicts, if it continues and is even marginally successful (by preventing Trump from BEING president), then it will continue and guess what? The next president it happens to just might be a DemoncRAT.

      Suddenly the progressives realize what they’ve unleashed when they opened this particular Pandora’s Box. What is good for Trump is certainly owed to any future DemoncRAT, no matter if it’s somebody we like or even just tolerate. THIS CANNOT STAND. If it does, then the Republicans MUST give tit for tat.

  14. So why did Obama hand over control of the container ports in California and Florida to the Chinese?
    Why has President Trump sent 10000 Marines to practice invasion manoeuvres off the coast of SOuthern California?
    First of all what is all this global chaos about?
    Here is an extremely good explanation about the total global war instead of the indivdual local battles:
    But that says the elites want WW3.
    (Destroy the esatblished world orders to put in a new one world dictatorship – China to lead it for a while)
    So what about the ports?
    The satellite controlled cargo container that houses nuclear missiles that can be smuggled into a naive country. Looks like an ordinary freight container but can launch up to four nuclear missiles.
    Are we a naive country?
    Well we sure were under Obama’s rule.
    I am still amazed at the outright TREASON of Obama and his cohorts.
    Why hasn’t President Trump abrogated the Kigali Treaty and kicked out all the Chinese and Russian troops that are present in this country under UN auspices?
    I suspect there is more of a miitary reason than a political reason.
    President Trump is not stupid and he is served by top level military intelligence – so he knows all of this. Dr Dave Janda says this is “Q”.
    It is, I think, a question of strategy.
    The House of Representatives follies are a sideshow like at a circus. They are not the Main Attraction.


    “You’d really think the American people would have caught on by now. No sooner did Russiagate fizzle out like a wet firecracker did the Democrats, completely indifferent to the dire consequences, toss another incendiary into the public square. Sooner or later something has got to blow, and maybe it already did.

    As Americans experience the brutal whiplash of going from the Mueller probe to presidential impeachment in a matter of days, all pretensions of democratic procedure to guide the show trial have been tossed from the clown car. With the boot-licking media to back their every whim and fancy, the Democrats are dragging the Republic to the brink of destruction as they threaten to take down the 45th POTUS, and without a single witness in the dock. …

    This is where the push for impeachment is becoming a dangerous venture for the Democrats. The people are not stupid, and it does not require the shrewdest political tool to understand that the scales of justice are weighted heavily in favor of the Democrats. From Hillary Clinton escaping punishment for using her home computer to send classified government documents, to former Vice President Joe Biden bragging about arranging a billion-dollar quid pro quo with Kiev to sack Ukraine’s top prosecutor, who just happened to be investigating Biden’s son, Hunter, the Democrats rarely have anything to fear as far as justice is concerned. Yet this special status has certainly not gone unnoticed; with social media revolutionizing the ‘town square,’ the blatant hypocrisies and outright crimes are obvious to everyone. …

    In other words, there are two vehicles – one filled with Democrats, the other Republicans – careening towards an intersection at a high rate of speed, and neither looks willing to yield to the other. This is the situation confronting America at the present time: a smashup of epic, deadly proportions, quite possibly on par with its first civil war. Such a seemingly inevitable event, however, would never have been remotely possible had the media been a fair and just provider of news and information as opposed to being an instigator and provocateur of the first order.

    Now, should the Democrats get the impeachment they’ve been dreaming about ever since they lost the 2016 presidential election, at least 50 percent of the American public will understand full well that the scales of justice are tilted against them. That will be the moment when the United States is forced to confront its worst crisis in many years, simply because the Democrats have become so terrified of a longstanding political technology known as ‘free and fair elections.’”

  16. Here’s a Kennedy I can actually applaud:

    “Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Saturday for using an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump as a way to undo the 2016 presidential election which Democrats suggest was wrongly decided by the American people.

    “When I watch the House impeachment proceedings I am both perplexed and appalled,” Kennedy told Fox News host Neil Cavuto. “Here is what I hear Speaker Pelosi and saying to the American people: ‘You’re stupid and we are smart.’ I hear them saying to the American people, ‘you are so stupid you can’t govern yourselves.’ I hear them saying ‘you are so stupid that you chose President Trump over Secretary Clinton and we have got to fix it for you.’ I hear them saying ‘you are so stupid we are not even going to show you the evidence, you can’t handle it. We are going to do all of this behind closed doors and then tell you what we are going to do.’”

    “I find that appalling. I find it perplexing because I read all these stories about Speaker Pelosi and what an extraordinarily talented politician she is and how she’s a strategic thinker and major tactician and I think to myself, does she really believe the American people are going to fall for this?” he continued. “I know that Speaker Pelosi is a smart lady — she’s not dumb, but if this were anybody else I would be thinking to myself it must suck to be that dumb.” …”

    IMO, it’s not because they think we’re THAT stupid, it’s because they have NO OTHER RECOURSE but to try this lame impeachment because … TREASON.


    I’ve been waiting to hear from Luntz about impeachment and these lying polls.

    • SAY ~ WHAT? TRUMP 2020 …or did U NOT get the MEMO?

      • ELIJAH .. shout it OUT! ELIJAH ha’ really sad …the crap they pull on US

        ~ old lefty4 ….+ many > more …comments
        It used to be the American dream to start in a company, work hard & advance over the years and eventually become president of the company or start your own company & that was the path to wealth. Today it seems the way to wealth is to become a politician. What has changed? In my estimation, the Career Politician is what has Changed. We no longer have successful men who lend their Talents to government as a Civic DUTY or responsibility. Today we have pols who have Never worked a Real JOB in their life telling folks who are paying their wages, HOW to Live & conduct their business. And once they are in the only way they ever leave is in a highly ornate >>>>> Casket probably paid for by the taxpayer$.

        Look at the puff piece from the article 1. “powerhouse politician Rep. Elijah Cummings” 2. “from 1996 until his untimely passing” 3. “a force to be reckoned with” & finally, 4. “Rep. Cummings’ legacy will live on for years to come.”
        Did AOL write this ??? or was it someone from the DNC? …ha’

        Just a few $hort years ago he was BE-Hind on Child $upport Payment$ now he is Worth a Million Buck$? Isn’t the wife under Investigation 4 her >>> N O N >>> profit work?….? & WHO PROFITS FROM THEM? O’
        cummings had a negative net worth when he went to Congress and more than $1.5 million when he passed. That is only what is declared.
        Rep. Cummings’ legacy will live on for years to come.
        Yes – It will take Decades for Baltimore to be considered a Place to Live.
        Becoming a career democrat community activist & politician is rewarding work.
        The L E F T … wants the tax returns of Some Guy who was a Billionaire already & then became a politician.
        Smart people want the tax returns of people who work and Congress & become Multi-Millionaire$ …… >>>> while doing so. ???$$$$$ ???
        Show the Value of the 2 … foundations in His Wife’s Name! < O' !!!
        He was Heavily in Debt just a few years Ago, before they $tarted those
        2 FOUND-ations. Big corporations Donated big Buck$… to fund them.
        Just goes to show you that our congress is getting Rich OFF the People
        …. of the USA …YEP YEP YEP!
        Did democrats help…. Poor? Nope. Did Elijah help the Poor?
        Nope. Just look it up on your computer…..WAKE UP U FOOLS!!! CONS

  18. So today Schumer and others are talking about how they fear that Trump is going to out the “whistleblower,” which makes me believe that they KNOW already that the name is going to come out soon AND they want to falsely BLAME POTUS for it. OR ELSE what they’re doing is another sting/set up. They will feed the name to the media, maybe conservative media, and make it APPEAR as if Trump is behind it and then they’ll just add that to their list of so-called “crimes” that they announce Trump committed, due process and open trials be damned! I SUSPECT everything they say, every NARRATIVE they put out. Just as I smelled a setup the first time I heard about that weird story, out of the blue, about Trump and Russia and then later this so-called whistleblower complaint being hidden from Congress, I SMELLED A RAT AND I SMELL ONE THIS TIME, AGAIN. Watch for MORE DIRTY TRICKS. It’s what they do. It’s ALL they know how to do because they can’t win on their policies, that’s for sure. Maybe in South America or elsewhere in the Third World, but not in the USA.

    • Is this related?

      “Ever since Rep. Adam Schiff admitted to his “parody” and turned out to have had contact with the whistleblower, the story mysteriously worked its way out of the news cycle. …”


      That underlies the story I cited above. When I read it, the SMELL got stronger. Maybe there’s to be a twofer here. Blame Trump AND blame somebody else they want to get rid of in his administration. Could be Maguire, Mulvaney, Pompeo, Barr, anybody. But, again, this smells of a SETUP. Don’t forget what they did to Scooter Libby. Process crime. Catch them in a perjury trap. What else can happen with SECRET KANGAROO COURTS? Here’s the possible plan: Leak the name, similar to how the dossier was laundered through multiple points. Blame POTUS. Blame somebody he allegedly put up to it. Subpoena them. Trick them into a “lie”. Don’t forget the allegations that the Deep State, in collusion with Italians, iirc, planned to PLANT information on someone’s computer. It can certainly be done. It would LOOK as if it’s evidence, especially to people who are NOT tech savvy. Look how the media et al seem to believe the LIE that the DNC was “hacked” by Russians. Tech experts know better. This smells.

      From the story:

      “Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) is warning top intelligence community officials that President Trump could expose a whistleblower at the center of the House impeachment inquiry.

      Schumer sent a letter to acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire and Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Monday saying he’s “concerned” Trump might disclose the individual’s identity and wants to know what steps are being taken to protect the person.

      “In light of the President’s ill-advised statements, his lack of respect for the rule of law and his well-documented habit of condoning violence by his supporters, I am concerned that he may disclose the whistleblower’s identity or cause it to be disclosed by others in the Administration,” Schumer wrote in the letter. …”

      Do you catch a whiff here? The letter? Building a “paper trail,” in the same way it appears that Taylor was trying to build a bogus “quid quo pro” paper trail about Ukraine?

      I smelled this rat and I was right, something I’m rather proud of. I sensed it before many others did and I was asking questions, some of which have been answered and some of which still remain unanswered. This is how they roll. It’s sad to have to admit that after studying their mendacity for over a decade here on this blog, I’m beginning to grok HOW THEY THINK.


    Read the whole article because it’s great, but I wanted to point out several things I’ve noticed in the narratives lately. Besides the sudden switch from quid pro quo to “conditionality,” do note when you listen to the so-called journalists, when they interview or opine, how they deliberately conflate Giuliani’s investigation (aka “digging up dirt on Trump’s political opponents”) and the Barr/Durham investigation into the foundations of the Trump/Russia collusion false flag and its nexus, now, to the Ukraine conspiracy theory.

    They deliberately call the Barr/Durham investigation a “political” investigation. Stephanopoulos did it repeatedly yesterday while interviewing Mike Pompeo (whom I nominate to run for POTUS in 2024). That is no doubt a talking point, an ORDER, given to the complicit media to try as much as possible to LIE about and DIMINISH the seriousness of the Barr/Durham investigation into attempts by the intel community to sabotage Trump’s candidacy and to then overthrow his administration by any means necessary, including treasonously colluding with foreign actors, whether in foreign governments or as foreign civilians. They fear the hammer will soon drop and ALL they can do right now is to make it appear AS IF Barr’s investigations are NOT serious and are completely political, which is a most dangerous LIE, considering what’s going on with our Republic and the implications of NOT getting to the bottom of this TREASONOUS COUP.

    What Giuliani was doing was what ALL lawyers do–investigating allegations against his client, trying to poke holes in false accusations. Remember Perry Mason? Did he not send Paul, the private investigator, wherever necessary to build the defense for his client? ALL of Giuliani’s activities happened BEFORE any Ukraine phone call. ALL took place with the full knowledge of the State Dept. AND with their help. He reported back to them. They worked WITH HIM. Here we come to another media lie/meme: The “shadow foreign policy.” There was NOTHING shadow about it. Giuliani openly worked WITH THE DEPT. OF STATE. Nothing shadow at all. Besides which, the POTUS has the power under the Constitution to create and deploy civilian “special envoys” anywhere in the world. As Pompeo pointed out yesterday, remember Sidney Blumenthal? Remember Bill Richardson? He didn’t point out, but I seem to remember Obama sending any number of celebrities to “interfere” in foreign nations. Rappers, iirc.

    So the media deliberately lie that Giuliani was engaged in illegal quid pro quo activities, threatening Ukrainians on behalf of the president, running a “shadow” foreign policy, none of which is true, and then they ALSO say he was digging up dirt on Biden, and then they impute a false motive to his activities, too: to “interfere in the 2020 election.” None of it is true, but the media make sure to use all those words and false allegations WITHOUT EVIDENCE.

    Then they deliberately confuse Giuliani’s private, legal, lawyer’s investigation with the DOJ CRIMINAL and COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE, wholly legal, wholly necessary, investigation into the origins of the foreign interference in the 2016 election and the origins of the scheme that ended up damaging the administration of President Trump and costing taxpayers over 40 million dollars FOR NO REASON but political reasons!

    They lie and confuse the two investigations, call both of the investigations FALSELY as “political,” and pretend AS IF they don’t remember early reporting that Ukraine and the DEMONCRATS colluded to interfere in the 2016 election–all for political reasons.

    Digging up dirt. Political investigations. Quid pro quo. Conditionality. Collusion. Obstruction. Pressuring. The President said, “without evidence …” The President had a “meltdown.” The President “gave Turkey the green light.” The President “abandoned” our allies, the Kurds.

    ALL OF THESE ARE BIASED TALKING POINTS. Watch for them. Take note. REMEMBER and act accordingly.

    SHAME on ALL the GAME HEADS playing with WTP’S TIME & MONEY

    Kamala Harris Accuses Giuliani of Breaking Laws but Then Can’t Name Any
    Posted on October 21, 2019, 3:29 pm by Keith Koffler • 8 Comments
    Alright. Score one for Anderson.

    It comes at about the 1:00 mark. Just look at the FEAR’ in her face as
    she’s asked to Name a Specific Crime & know she’s got nothing. ZERO

    • I saw that the other day. It was PRICELESS. I wondered at the time whether Giuliani can sue the hell out of her for libel. She doesn’t say “allegedly,” she claims he broke many laws (but she can’t even name one). THIS WOMAN is supposed to be a lawyer. She ought to be disbarred, imho. For sure, she doesn’t believe in “innocent until proved guilty” or in due process. That alone disqualifies her from the practice of law. Again, imho.

  21. @ Keith Koffler. WHD provides 24/7 White House coverage. < YEP!

    Democrats Fear Getting Flattened Under Trump Fundraising Steamroller
    Uh oh. Democrats are getting ulcers. Trump has too much money.
    They Tried impeaching him over RussiA, but that was a Dud. Now they’ve moved one country over to UkrainE. …<<<< ? …..MONEY !!! …that GREEN $TUFF … GO TRUMP!

    • It’s sort of amazing, isn’t it? He’s a billionaire and yet, for some reason THE PROGRESSIVES CAN’T UNDERSTAND, people are giving their money to him. He can afford to finance his own campaign. The progressives can’t (or won’t, being cheapskate liberals. It’s a fact of life for liberals that they NEVER donate THEIR OWN MONEY. All they do is virtue signal while “raising money” for causes. NEVER their own money. Just somebody else’s money. We’re supposed to praise them because they manage to get other people to give money and yet THEY take the credit for the donations AS IF they themselves made the sacrifices.)

    • Here’s my prediction: They’re going to threaten, coerce, extort, scream, shame, whatever it takes, the media outlets to try to get them to REFUSE TO RUN TRUMP ADS OR REFUSE TO SELL ADVERTISING TIME TO CONSERVATIVES, REPUBLICANS, AND ESPECIALLY POTUS, even though it’s illegal for broadcasters to do so. Count on it. It’s ALL they can do. They’ve managed to bully social media (as if they didn’t welcome the bullying) so they MUST now go after places that sell political advertising, whether it be print media, TV, radio. Whatever. By ANY MEANS they WILL try to muzzle our President and anybody who supports him.

      And what a joke. The DemoncRATS don’t have to compete dollar for dollar with ANY Republicans. The media give DemoncRATS 100% support in billions of dollars worth of “in kind donations.” All free of charge and under the guise of “free press.”

  22. ha’ SHIFT ..IN 2 – H I G H – GEAR!!! … LET’S ROLL .. TICK TICK!

    184 House Republicans >> Back Bill to Censure Adam Schiff Ahead
    … of Monday Vote
    michelle • 4 hours ago
    Here are the names of the dozen Republicans refuse to co-sponsor the legislation. You can contact your local Congressman by calling the US Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121.

    See the L I S T…. below:

    Martha Roby (R-AL)
    Ken Buck (R-CO)
    Francis Rooney (R-FL)
    Rob Woodall (R-GA)
    Rodney Davis (R-IL)
    Greg Pence (R-IL)
    Tom Reed (R-NY)
    John Katko (R-NY)
    Mike Turner (R-OH
    Greg Walden (R-OR)
    Dusty Johnson (R-SD)
    Van Taylor (R-TX)
    Michael McCaul (R-TX)
    Mac Thornberry (R-TX)
    Jmie-Herrera Beutler (R-WA)
    Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-W)

    ^^^^ YEP WTP SEE & SM E L L ~ U … U ALL ROTTEN 2 the CORE!

    ~ BruceT michelle • + many Mo’ ….ha’
    A M U C H >>>>> more >>>> IMPORTANT … L I S T !!!! 4 SURE!!!
    ~Behold the democrats in republican clothing.
    ~AKA National Traitors!
    ~Primary OUT those Traitors & install good Conservatives.
    ~Probably Never Trumper parasites !
    ~Lyin’ sack of Schiff will get his in the end !! All Sleazy Scum Gags do !
    ~K A G 2020 or the corrupt swamp wins !
    ~Primary the RINOs. Let’s do ALL WTP CAN 2 elect TRUMP Republicans.
    ***** TRUMP 2020! ***** T R U M P !!! ~ OUR MAIN MAN!

    184 … House Republicans have moved to back a resolution to Condemn House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) for Deliberately Fabricating a conversation between President Donald Trump & Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
    Over 184 House Republicans, or 93 percent, have cosponsored House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Biggs’ (R-AZ) H. Res. 604, according to
    a list obtained by Breitbart News. H. Res. 604 would condemn Schiff for reading a Fictional Phone CALL between Zelensky & Trump into the record.

  23. …PLEASE dearest God …JUST LOCK IT UP! it’s SO OVER DUE!

    • We need a new definition because I seriously doubt that anybody believes Hill has charm or charisma. Maybe Huma does. Certainly not Bill.

  24. good enough 2 WATCH ..YEP ! …it is JILL Stein

    • Just like she’s done for the past 4+ years. We know the drill. We’ve heard it all before. Where have Stein and Gabbard been these last years?

  25. ~ …. Southernyankee •
    Trannies should have to compete against other trannies, that is the only
    FAIR ….. thing to do.

    ~ Robert H. Short Southernyankee •
    NO! Emphatically, NO!……There are only two genders……….Trans is not a gender it is a mental defect and doing anything, including giving them their own category, is just encouraging them in their delusion.

    ~ SSpeedracer Robert H. Short •
    Dr. John Money was the first to use “Gender” when describing a person’s sex. Dr. Money was a pedophile. He arranged for, and watched twin children attempt intercourse. The twins were boys, however one had lost his shaft during a botched circumcision. Dr. Money removed the boys remaining genitalia, brainwashed the boy into believing HE was a girl and wrote his entire thesis of “Gender Identity” based on his own decrepit urges. Both twins would go on to commit suicide as adults.

    ~ Square Cloud SSpeedracer •
    Spot on. Gender is an artificial construct invented by perverts like Money & Kinsey. Of course gender is fluid – it was designed to be by the DNA Deniers.
    And that IS the F O U N D -ation of “Gender Identity”. ….
    >>>> John William Money Born July 8, 1921 ~ Died July 7, 2006

  26. Crooked Hillary Admits Unless Trump is Impeached & Removed From Office, It Will B >>> ‘Very Hard’ to Beat HIM >>> in 2020 (VIDEO)

    ~ Eddie_Baby •
    So impeaching him IS just Purely Political. That seems to be a consistent message among Dems.
    ~Justice Eddie_Baby •
    And like everything else they don’t even TRY to hide it anymore. So amazing. < just sick sick sick ,,,,,

    This is the “if Hillary gunned down an innocent old lady in the street, she wouldn’t (couldn’t) face justice.
    ~ TheIronEagle •
    Translation – We can only WIN ….. if we Cheat.
    The Democrat Motto since the party’s Inception < YEP !!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s