A Nit to Pick

Begging forgiveness for the above photo (which shows the nit of a human head louse), nevertheless I have a nit that I’m going to pick.

story in the UK news reports the suicide of a former member of the previous U.S. administration.

Barack Obama’s office released a statement on the death of Alan Krueger. (May he rest in peace and condolences to his friends and family.)

Here’s the beginning of the statement:

THE OFFICE OF BARACK OBAMA

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 18, 2019

Statement from President Barack Obama on the Passing of Alan Krueger

Go to the link to read his statement, if you’re so inclined.

The nit I wish to pick concerns the use of the title President in conjunction with Obama’s name.

It is always incorrect for a former president to use the title of President.

There is one and only one President of the United States, and that is President Donald J. Trump.

When a president leaves office, he leaves the title behind, because there’s only one president at a time. When someone says, “the president,” they mean the one and only president, which at the moment is President Trump.

The author of  Honor & Respect: The Official Guide to Names, Titles, and Forms of Address, Robert Hickey, states:

Is a Former President
Addressed as President (name)?
 …

Here’s what is the correct formula as it appears in my book …: 

  Former President of the United States …

    Here’s the WHY behind the correct form. This is the traditional approach for any office of which there is only one office-holder at a time. So, with officials such as mayors, governors or presidents … only the current office holder is addressed as Mr. Mayor, Governor, or Mr. President … formers are not addressed that way.

    That’s not to say some reporter might not call a former mayor Mayor Smith or a former president President (Surname). But doing so is incorrect and confusing to the public.

The former office holder is no longer due the precedence and courtesies we extend to the current office holder. He or she speaks with the authority of a private citizen. We honor former office holder’s service, but the ‘form of address’ — which acknowledges the responsibilities and duties of office — belongs only to current office holder. …

     To explain the correct form I would say “using the title of a former position is flattering to the former official and he or she may not correct you, but is not respectful to the current office holder.  There’s only one [president] at a time.”
                          — Robert Hickey

Needless to say, it’s doubly incorrect and disrespectful for the former office holder to continue to use the title of an office that he no longer holds.

Of course, it’s not surprising that Obama would still use the title of President, especially because it is “not respectful to the current office holder,” President Trump.

President Trump gets no respect, and never has, from Obama and his followers, including the media, which is why they incorrectly and disrespectfully continue to accord to Obama a title that belongs only to Donald J. Trump.

Why do they disrespect our president? Because Trump is the choice of the “deplorables.”

We get no respect, either.

#####

 

Advertisements

41 responses to “A Nit to Pick

  1. Oh, if only we were New Zealand where the leader can just “announce” a ban on guns and voila! It’s a done deal. (This is being reported in ALL our papers as if it’s a done deal. Don’t they have a parliament or Congress that must vote?) https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/20/world/asia/new-zealand-gun-ban.html

    Venezuela, Germany, here New Zealand comes.

    Oh, and let’s all wear a hijab (symbol of female oppression) in “solidarity,” too. Let’s recite the Quran in parliament, too.

    No doubt this dude is being called a bigot: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12215110 Hmm. Seems like that NRA meme: Thoughts and prayers, huh?

    Were only females killed or were they all males? Aren’t the sexes segregated in mosques? Most of the dead are MALE: “The document provides the names of 44 men and four women, and so is missing the identities of two of the 50 victims confirmed as dead by police. …”

    SO WHY ARE THEY WEARING A HIJAB IN HONOR OF THE DEAD? To honor their religiously based misogyny and the oppression, segregation, and subjugation of women?

    This is INSIDIOUS.

    White allies, huh? White guilt. (btw, probably most of the dead are technically “white.” They’re likely NOT aboriginals.)

    Female guilt? Stockholm syndrome. I repeat: the symbol of the OPPRESSION of women throughout the muslim world is being used to “honor” the dead in New Zealand.

    Consider their news: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/

    Will there be ANY opposition to the gun grab or will New Zealanders go gently into that good night? What’s the next step? WAKE UP!

    And as usual, questions about whether or not this was actually active shooter training. Consider:

    “The Herald has exclusive details about how the officers, after hearing there was an active shooter on the loose in the city, took to the streets to find him – and stop him.

    The officers, who the Herald has agreed not to name, are both based in smaller towns out of Christchurch.

    Their boss rural response manager Senior Sergeant Pete Stills said the pair had travelled into Christchurch to attend a training session at Princess Margaret Hospital in Cashmere.

    The training was held on a disused floor of the hospital and was around room clearance and dealing with offenders in armed incidents. “They were actually training when the call came through that there was an active armed offender in Christchurch,” Stills told the Herald.

    They had their work vehicles there with them with firearms in them.

    “They operationalised themselves and got into one car, they decided to skirt the city, they thought that’s what the offender would do – rather than drive through the CBD.

    “They were driving on Brougham Street because they thought if he’d just been to Linwood [the second mosque attacked] that’s a route he might take.” …”

    Uh, huh.

    Have the people of New Zealand been duped? There are, after all, only about 5 million of them.

    Instant problems for the gun shops. Panic buying, as here in the U.S. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12214087

    “Kiwi Gun Blog’s Mike Loder said the looming ban could see more demand, and warned it could also send guns underground.

    “There is talk of ‘panic buying‘, but really it is people who may already have spent money on trips and need gear, or need it in the future. Media say it is stockpiling but it is sportsmen getting what they need.

    Everywhere [a ban] has been tried the guns have gone underground, and the government loses control of them.”

    Loder said before any decisions there needed to be a full inquiry into the shootings.

    “They could find gun policies have not been properly followed.

    “If they find there is a problem with the gun laws I’ll demand that change myself, but this idea of destroying a sporting culture without a proper investigation is just bizarre.”

    Loder said if a ban on semi-automatic weapons came into play, the Government must provide compensation to gun owners. …”

    How the hell will you compensate people when their freedom is gone? Tyranny up next.

    Funny thing. Funny analogy. I read today that some progressive judge has shut down the granting of oil/gas leases on fed property on the premise that the government didn’t take into account, before awarding rights, the past, present, and FUTURE effect of burning fossil fuel on the environment. Do you think someone in the NZ parliament might argue that before they ban weapons people need for the “security of a free State” they might have to take into account all the past (Nazi Germany), present (Venezuela), and future places that have been, are now, and will probably soon be under the foot of a genocidal oppressor like, say, Adolph Hitler?

    • funny(or not so funny)….they were training when the Christchurch incident took place. Where have we heard that before?

      • We’ve heard it almost every time, haven’t we? Crisis actors, crisis “movie” directors, no blood, people shot in the head get up after being shot in the head (for another take), and a wounded hero dad is texting on his phone before his child allegedly looks in his eyes to see if he’s alive (after he shielded his kid from alleged bullets).

  2. https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/new-zealand-christchurch-shooting-intl/index.html

    This gets SO OLD after a while. All the elements are there. First there are multiple suspects. Then it gets down to the “lone shooter.” He’s always a white supremacist or a right-winger, even if/when his social media or “manifesto” (another tell) is exposed in full. There are immediate calls for gun control. In fact, magically the legislation already is written! There’s the “hero” who tried to stop the crime. There’s A victim reporting from his hospital bed to lend credibility. Reports of active shooter training in the vicinity at the same time. Imagine the coincidence! Suddenly there’s no more reporting on the other suspects. Or they’re let go, never to be named, so nobody can double check on them. Mission accomplished. Gun bans instituted. It’s so scripted.

    How many cars, again, did this guy drive as a “lone shooter?” There’s the one he escaped in, that the other heroes–cops in training on active shooter drills–rammed. Then there are two that supposedly contained explosives that had to be disarmed. How did he drive three cars, at least? How is it that whoever owned the cars with the explosives in them aren’t also arrested? Before you think this might be explosives set on other people’s cars, consider:

    “”Four are in custody, three of them are men and one is a woman,” commissioner Mike Bush said, saying there were “significant” and “multiple” fatalities.

    He said the suspected IEDs found attached to the attackers’ vehicles had been made safe by the military. …”

    On the attackers’ (PLURAL) cars. So there were multiple attackers and multiple cars. WHO ELSE WAS INVOLVED, WHY, AND WHAT IS BEHIND THIS CONSPIRACY?

    btw, IS ANYBODY GOING TO INVESTIGATE TO TELL US HOW THIS GUY COULD AFFORD TO TRAVEL TO PAKISTAN, DUBAI, NORTH KOREA, AND NOW ALSO BULGARIA? Is anybody going to ask WHY HE WENT? What he was doing there? Was he also getting some kind of training? Nobody in the media in the least curious about that?

  3. Supposedly, this guy worked in a gym. His father died young. Was he otherwise independently wealthy? Where did he get the money to travel the world and visit some countries multiple times? https://vacationinspire.com/tarrants-travels-a-path-to-radicalisation/

    “He also mentions visits to Iceland, Poland, New Zealand, Argentina and Ukraine. Bulgarian officials confirmed on Friday that Tarrant had travelled there in November 2018, flying into the capital of Sofia by way of Dubai and later driving to Hungary. Bulgaria’s chief prosecutor Sotir Tsatsarov said Tarrant spent around a week in the Balkan nation and that prosecutors are now probing whether he visited as a tourist “or if he had other objectives”. [WELL, AT LEAST THE BULGARIANS ARE CURIOUS.]

    Bulgarian officials also said he travelled through Bosnia, Montengreo, Croatia, and Serbia in December 2016. In the live-stream of the attack on Friday, a Serb nationalist song could be heard playing through his car speakers.

    On Saturday, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern confirmed that the suspect had traveled internationally, including trips to New Zealand. … A senior Turkish official told CNN that he also travelled to Turkey more than once. … Photos published in news outlets show him posing in front of the Samjiyon Grand Monument on a trip to North Korea. The New York Times reported that a man with Tarrant’s name visited Pakistan in October. …”

    Those are just the travels I found so far. Where did he get the money?

    Ok. Add India and Japan: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8657109/new-zealand-shooter-uk-radicalisation-far-right-links/

    btw, there’s NOTHING “far right” about his rants. He was a socialist, communist, self-described “eco-fascist.” That’s LEFT WING.

    Oh, sure. This “right winger” made the money to fund his travels via Bitconnect. RIGHT. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8642007/new-zealand-mosque-shooting-manifesto-anders-breivik/

    Rather conveniently UNTRACEABLE, huh? At the age of 19, too. Family not curious at all?

    Note how in that story they select out “ethnic autonomy” (which would be right up the alley of our left-wing identitarians here in the U.S., btw), totally ignoring the other spokes on his ideal-world wheel:

    anti-imperialism (showing George Washington as an imperialist, I suppose)
    environmentalism
    “responsible” markets (aka, not free market capitalism)
    worker’s rights (a la Sanders and Ocasio and other socialist and communists)
    protection of heritage and culture (again, like identitarians in the U.S. who are ALL ABOUT culture and protecting them from appropriation)

    Not to mention he used Satanist symbols, too.

    I’m just sayin’.

    Add China! https://www.news.com.au/world/pacific/christchurch-mosque-shooters-bizarre-trip-to-north-korea/news-story/e840b3a5a16b9266c9a562260c6c4b59 He got around.

    btw, Bitconnect existed only from 2016 to January 2018, so the dates, obviously, don’t match up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitconnect “Black money”

    Now an alternative narrative is that he inherited money from his father (a garbage man) when he died and, of course, instead of helping his widowed mother and family, he blew it on world travel?
    https://heavy.com/news/2019/03/brenton-tarrant/

    More discrepancies. Some stories say his dad committed suicide; others say he died from cancer.

  4. Supposedly, this guy worked in a gym. His father died young. Was he otherwise independently wealthy? Where did he get the money to travel the world and visit some countries multiple times? https://vacationinspire.com/tarrants-travels-a-path-to-radicalisation/

    “He also mentions visits to Iceland, Poland, New Zealand, Argentina and Ukraine. Bulgarian officials confirmed on Friday that Tarrant had travelled there in November 2018, flying into the capital of Sofia by way of Dubai and later driving to Hungary. Bulgaria’s chief prosecutor Sotir Tsatsarov said Tarrant spent around a week in the Balkan nation and that prosecutors are now probing whether he visited as a tourist “or if he had other objectives”. [WELL, AT LEAST THE BULGARIANS ARE CURIOUS.]

    Bulgarian officials also said he travelled through Bosnia, Montengreo, Croatia, and Serbia in December 2016. In the live-stream of the attack on Friday, a Serb nationalist song could be heard playing through his car speakers.

    On Saturday, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern confirmed that the suspect had traveled internationally, including trips to New Zealand. … A senior Turkish official told CNN that he also travelled to Turkey more than once. … Photos published in news outlets show him posing in front of the Samjiyon Grand Monument on a trip to North Korea. The New York Times reported that a man with Tarrant’s name visited Pakistan in October. …”

    Those are just the travels I found so far. Where did he get the money?

  5. https://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2019/03/new-zealand-mosque-attacks-false-flag.html

    What more can I say? More coincidences. And not having time or inclination to double check all this, but look at the different photos of the alleged perp. He cannot be both people. As usual, doubles used or imposters?

    He’s been on these things before, hasn’t he? https://twitter.com/JimFetzer

    And Dr. Eowyn, too: https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/nz-mosque-shooting-hero-dad-caught-texting-in-rehearsal-video

    • There’s an analysis of the video at the first link. Don’t watch if you don’t want to, but it’s not as graphic as they claim. It’s certainly interesting. For example, people with no blood or wounds. People laying down as if shot before the guy even arrives. People “shot” through the windshield of the car and magically, they bleed, but the windshield doesn’t even break! Some of it is disturbing, if what’s being shown is real, but it’s no worse than watching a very graphic movie and actually is much less gory than many (other) movies I’ve seen. It’s said by the analyst that he used an air gun. This is backed up by how sometimes there are ejected bullet casings while other times there are not. He “shoots” at people who aren’t even there. iow, he’s shooting randomly down a vacant street (not even traffic or pedestrians). Just randomly shooting. He goes inside, leaving his trunk open where there are multiple guns and cans of what’s presumed to be gasoline (all brand new equipment). He plays a sound track! The sound track of people allegedly moaning doesn’t even match the “action” on the screen. The analyst explains that the reason there’s writing all over the guns is because the fake guns have clear embossing on them that needed to be covered up, so it wasn’t as obvious that these were fake guns (toys), with blanks, shooting basically AIR. There’re seconds of time during which he’s supposed to be changing the ammo in the gun but he can’t do it. It’s as if he’s an amateur and can’t figure out how. Long seconds go by. NOBODY moves. He shoots the same people over an over again. Leaves the room. Comes back and shoots the same bunch of people again. Leaves the room. Comes back and does the same thing (as if multiple takes. As if later on the “movie” is supposed to be edited/spliced to make a seamless story.) I don’t even see that there were as many people in the place, supposedly killed or wounded, to match the number claimed to be casualties. I am more convinced than ever that this is completely staged. Taqiyya? Who knows? A combination for sure. No wonder they have managed to suppress the video. It’s so easy to take it apart. Truly scary and frightening to think this is going on and nobody in the media even questions it and, in fact, they play along.

      Another thing: Multiple times when he’s driving along in his car, his face is visible in the rear-view mirror. However, it’s not. It appears to be deliberately blurred so you can’t tell if it’s the alleged shooter or not. At 1:12:00 is the best point I could see the guy. Appears to be a dark red head. Long sideburns. Can’t tell if it’s the guy charged, but does it matter? Where have all the other shooters gone? Do we know? Has anybody seen them since? Do they just disappear into “witness protection” or is there some happy isle somewhere where they all live in luxury?

      btw, the guy talks about having taken 5 Xanax. Haven’t we heard about that before, too? It is prescribed for them so they can “function” without anxiety, etc. MKULTRA.

  6. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/21/christchurch-shooting-alleged-victim-is-alive-and-well

    Am I reading this right? They charged him with the murder of a person later found to be alive?

  7. Begin at 1:15:00. This expert on false flags believes that there was an attack, but by professionals or some other bad actors, BUT that the video put out was made during the “drill” or somewhere or somehow else. There’s SOMETHING wrong and something going on. Gaslighting. Who knows what the hell is going on?

  8. I find this guy interesting, although not sure I agree with him completely. Nevertheless, he has much of interest to say.

  9. if ….gave a person HONEST RESPECT ….not dirty games …
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3736431/posts

    • I wonder did she also at any point tell McCain or any other RINOs and anti-Trumpers (or anybody in the media, for that matter) that the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES DESERVES RESPECT, TOO?

      Anybody who jumps on this bandwagon that says Trump is attacking a “war hero” and implying there’s not a PERFECTLY GOOD LEGITIMATE REASON WHY does not deserve to represent anyone in our government. This man, this “war hero,” colluded with the corrupt Hillary Clinton and her minions to attempt to destroy the presidency of a man who had just been elected by WE THE PEOPLE (who RULE in this country). His actions have caused the loss of standing of Trump in the world, negatively affected our foreign policy and our NATIONAL SECURITY, and cost the U.S. taxpayers millions of dollars–all because the losers of the 2016 election could not accept that they lost, would not be AMERICAN ENOUGH TO ACCEPT THE ELECTION (OR PRIMARY) RESULTS (AS EVERY OTHER PERSON WHO LOST AN ELECTION DID, INCLUDING THE MUCH MALIGNED NIXON, who thereby proved he had more class than Hillary Clinton and John McCain), and so attempted a “soft coup” AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. Make no mistake. Yes, they tried to ruin the presidency of Trump, but this was not solely an attack on POTUS. THIS WAS A SEDITIOUS, UN-AMERICAN ATTACK ON THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

      McCain knew, Clinton knew, Obama knew, Brennan knew, Comey knew, they all KNEW, that PRESIDENT Donald J. Trump did NOT “COLLUDE” with Russians to interfere in our elections. HE DIDN’T HAVE TO COLLUDE. HE WON FAIR AND SQUARE.

      If the Russians helped anyone, it was Clinton and she lost anyway. Not because of Russians but because WE THE PEOPLE, the “deplorables,” saw her for what she is and always was: A thoroughly corrupt woman.

  10. When guns are outlawed only the cia will have guns.
    “Q” says Start a List

  11. ~ ~ ~ Subject: MUSLIMS
    Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man, both in surgery & in critical thinking.
    Everyone must read this as we welcome Muslims into our mainly Christian country.
    ~ * * * Please read <<>>>> then pass it O N .* * *
    Subject: Dr. BEN CARSON ~ on MUSLIMS
    This has been the underlying premise that has kept Christianity & Islam at war for almost 2000 Years. They cannot & will not assimilate into any society that does not embrace their theocratic views. Europe has already suffered a recent invasion of Muslims under the guise of refugees that will destroy Europe as we & they knew it. To ignore the same here will be at OUR Peril.
    This denial has been the Downfall of every non-Muslim nation who has refused to or has been afraid to believe it – do not fall into the trap of thinking anyone who is aware is racist or paranoid – the informed always have the advantage.
    I want adults and children to understand this regarding MUSLIMS.
    CAN MUSLIMS BE GOOD AMERICANS?
    This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. And send it on to everyone.
    Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet & not speaking out about any atrocities.
    CAN …. a good Muslim be a good American?
    Theologically – N O . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god of Arabia .
    Religiously – No. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam. (Quran,2:256)
    Scripturally – No. Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam & the Quran.
    Geographically – No. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
    Socially – No. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
    Politically – No. Because he must submit to the mullahs, who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.
    Domestically – No. Because he is instructed to marry 4 women & beat & scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (Quran 4:34
    Intellectually – No. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles & he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
    Philosophically – No. Because Islam, Muhammad, & the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy & Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
    Spiritually – No. Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ The Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in thee Quran’s 99 excellent names.
    Therefore, after much study and deliberation…Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims & ‘good’ Americans. Call it what you wish, it’s still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be for O U R ….country & O U R future.
    The religious war is bigger than we know or understand!

    Footnote:The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.
    ~ ~ ~ SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. ~ ~ ~
    The Military wants this message to roll all over the U.S.

    • Anathema. Impossible. Anything else is taqiyya. False flags would, of course, come naturally. So would suicide to further the cause. Consider New Zealand.

      • https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/the-caption-contest

        That’s one of the oddities that I failed to point out in my other bloviations on New Zealand. The guy who was supposedly shot but was TEXTING while lying there when he was said to actually be shielding his small child from shots. Supposedly shot, child looking vainly into his eyes, hoping to see life (as if 2-year-olds are that aware), but instead he’s caught on camera TEXTING while waiting for the “take” to begin, I suppose. It’s said in various stories that these were crisis actors brought in from Jordan. How this is known, I can’t say. The “expert” on false flags who was interviewed by the Irish woman in one of the links I provided said that his sources say that hospitals DID receive people with gunshot wounds. He believes the film was manufactured via a combo of CGI and during a drill, using crisis actors. That makes sense. Then an actual attack was perpetrated by multiple shooters from the cabal that pulls off this stuff, whoever they are, whether CIA, MI-5, etc. That also is possible. Also possible is that this is a new kind of islamic terror attack in which their “suicide” doesn’t take the form we’ve seen in the past, where innocents are taken out by suiciders wearing explosive vests, but are sacrificial lambs for the “cause” which is to defeat infidels from the inside by staging such events (with victims going straight to paradise and their 72 virgins) and blaming the event on their political opponents (like Trump) and ALSO to further protection of islam (look at the PM of New Zealand in her hijab), to innoculate islam and muslims from criticism of any kind (lest the islamophobia card be played), and (very important) to succeed in disarming infidel citizens via gun control (all the better to make you submit, my dears). Is this a crazy theory? It’s a hypothesis that explains a lot of the evidence.

  12. … PROBE them ALL !!! …. newest UPDATE… ?
    KEY POINTS
    Special counsel Robert Mueller submits his report on the Russia investigation to Attorney General William Barr.
    Nearly 200 charges against 34 people and three Russian companies have been filed since the beginning of the investigation. Six of those indicted are former Trump advisors.>>>> Twenty-six are Russian nationals. ????
    Separating fact from conjecture can be difficult amid the noise surrounding the investigation.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/22/what-we-know-about-special-counsel-muellers-russia-probe-so-far.html

  13. https://www.qazini.com/Interviews/Ruth-Ndesandjo-on-investing-in-children
    you cant tell in this photo how much smaller Mr. Ndesandjo is in comparison to Mrs. Ruth, but he’s way smaller. Ive seen other photos of them together and she looks as though she lead him around.

    • Shouldn’t they make than man change his name?

    • Now how effing interesting. Note the emphasis on the word “exonerate.” So Mueller totally exonerated POTUS, his campaign, officials, and ALL U.S. persons of collusion. Read the letter. HOWEVER, Mueller specifically says he didn’t “exonerate” POTUS on obstruction of justice, which is a non-crime with regard to POTUS, who did NOTHING except what is under his Constitutional authority TO DO.

    • UNBELIEVABLE what she said. Simply unbelievable. But Babs will get a pass because she’s a Clinton/Obama lover. Imagine anyone saying anything remotely like this about a priest similarly accused, with far less evidence than in the case of Jackson.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s