The First Birther and Other Prevaricating Democrats

Just this past week, former president Barack Obama made reference, yet again, to the “wild conspiracy theory” that he doesn’t have a valid birth certificate. In fact, Obama lumped the issue of his birth certificate (credibly alleged to be forged) together with what he calls another “wild conspiracy theory” — the one “surrounding Benghazi,” as if facts about what really happened in Benghazi are not true.

The thing about Obama is that he just can’t seem to let go of that “wild conspiracy theory” about his birth certificate. He’s constantly talking about it, still hung up on it, even after his presidency is history.

Odd that Obama believes that the issue of his birth certificate is just a conspiracy theory, considering that he himself was the very first “birther.” 

Way back in 1990, Obama, writing for the (satirical) Harvard Law Revue, referred to himself as the

First African African-American President of a major law revue published outside of New Haven.

What else is an African African-American other than a black African that became, at some point, an American?

A year later, in 1991, when Obama was promoting his first book, the publisher sent out a booklet containing a brief biography of this new author:

Barack Obama, the first African-American president of the Harvard Law Review, was born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.  

This alleged error was not changed for nearly two decades, until questioned during the 2012 election campaign. Wouldn’t an author have supplied his publishers with the facts surrounding his life story because, well, how else would they know?

On a recent trip to Kenya, Obama made this “wild” Freudian slip:

Now, three years ago, I visited Kenya as the first sitting American President to come from Kenya.

Whoops! Priceless.

What is it with progressive politicians that they can’t tell the truth about their life stories? Why do they embellish? Or outright lie? Or fabricate? Or equivocate? Or exaggerate? Or give false impressions? Or deliberately muddy the waters and then hide evidence that would reveal truth?

Other progressives exhibit this curious behavior, as if they’re ashamed of who they really are. For example, there’s Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has claimed to be of Native American extraction (a mere 1/32, although it can’t be verified). Genealogists believe they have disproved her claim. Native Americans are variously outraged, or bemused.

Robert “Beto” O’Rourke is currently running for the U.S. Senate from Texas. One would imagine that Beto would have at least some Hispanic ancestry. Nope! He’s completely Irish-American. The candidate claims that the nickname Beto, a common Hispanic diminutive for names containing “bert” (e.g., Roberto, Ediberto, etc.), was given to him in childhood and the nickname just “stuck.” Research shows, however, that in college, Beto went by Rob or Robert. Now running for office from a heavily Hispanic district, Beto apparently self-identifies as a “son of the border” who has “imbued himself with Hispanic culture.” Shades of Rachel Dolezal.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, running for the U.S. House of Representatives from New York, has given the false impression that she is just “a girl from the Bronx,” from a working class background, whose mother was a cleaning lady. In truth, she grew up in upscale Westchester County, her father was a well-known and successful architect with his own firm, and it was actually her grandmother who cleaned houses, back in Puerto Rico. Only this week, continuing her outreach to the working class, she met with construction workers while wearing a $3500 designer outfit! She’s just another girl from the Bronx.

There’s another Hispanic candidate who’s fibbing about quite a few details of her past life: Julia Salazar. She’s running for the New York state Senate. Salazar has a confusing biography (not unlike Barack Obama). She may be Jewish. Then again, she may be a conservative Christian. She definitely was pro-life, at least in college. She may once have been a Republican, but she’s running now as a pro-choice “left-wing, anti-Israel Jew” on a Democrat ticket. Salazar said that she was born in Colombia and is a “proud immigrant” who came to the U.S. with her parents, as an infant. She was reported to be a naturalized citizen. She now says that she was born in Miami.

Who could forget Ilhan Omar, a Muslim Somali-American, who’s running for the U.S. House of Representatives? Omar has had two husbands, one of whom is probably her own brother. Omar seemingly perjured herself under oath, in a divorce proceeding, concerning a child who was born while she was still married to her presumed brother. She may or may not have divorced her first husband before marrying the second (her brother). It’s been suggested that she married her brother to help him immigrate to the U.S., which, if true, is immigration fraud.

Why do so many progressives lie about their life stories? Aren’t they comfortable in their own skins? Are they ashamed of their real roots? Why must they all have a fabricated identity?

Sometimes the answer is obvious. If one eventually wishes to become president of the United States, one must be a natural born citizen. It’s required by the Constitution. That fact explains Obama’s prevarications. It may also explain Salazar’s, depending upon whether she plans to or is being groomed to run for the presidency. It’s been written that

Even if Julia Salazar was born outside the United States, as of 1986, a child born in wedlock in a foreign country who had one parent who was an American citizen who had lived in the United States for a total of five years at any time prior to the child’s birth is automatically granted citizenship.

This might explain why someone has changed her story and suddenly says she was born in Miami. If Salazar runs for the presidency, will we then have to go through all that birth certificate nonsense again, because the mainstream media are demonstrably incurious when it comes to vetting candidates “of color?” The progressive media doesn’t like to ask anyone “of color” for his or her papers. It’s bad form, apparently, even if the law and the Constitution require it.

The above quoted paragraph does not apply to Barack Obama. If he was born outside the U.S. to the parents he has named, he was not “automatically granted citizenship” since his mother had not lived in the U.S. long enough after the age of 14 to convey citizenship upon him. In either case, he would still not be a natural born citizen, because even automatically granted citizenship is statutory citizenship, not natural born citizenship. But we simply don’t know, because he’s never supplied any evidence that verifies his eligibility.

One has to wonder if Salazar, like Obama, has multiple citizenships. In Obama’s case, he has held British, Kenyan, Indonesian, and U.S. citizenship. Is Salazar also a citizen of Colombia?

The parallels between Salazar and Obama are obvious. She, like he, has used various names, further confusing the ability to discern truth. As with Obama, reporters are already rewriting stories to correct so-called errors, despite the fact that there remain inconsistencies in the narratives provided by the candidate, her family, and her spokesperson. How do reporters decide whom to believe? Compare one original story,

Salazar, 27, was born to politically conservative parents—her Colombian immigrant father was a cargo pilot and her Italian-American mother a flight attendant—and grew up in Colombia and Florida. (She’s a naturalized U.S. citizen.

with the current version of the same story:

Salazar, 27, was born to politically conservative parents — her Colombian immigrant father was a cargo pilot and her Italian-American mother a flight attendant — and grew up in Florida

It would seem to be a simple matter to supply the documents that would prove the truth. Birth certificate. Naturalization records. School records. Parents’ citizenship records. Passports.

But wait! We’re still missing all those kinds of records for Obama–real certified documents, not digital images that could as easily be photoshopped as this image.

But don’t expect any reporter to ask for documentary proof of any of the claims made by progressive candidates about their life stories. Progressives of color have diversity privilege. They all seem to have, amazingly enough, the same biographical ghost writer. Are they all Soros babies? All being groomed for office, to continue Obama’s fundamental transformation of America, by any means necessary (even if via false identity)?

Many progressive candidates with sketchy life histories claim to be of the working class. Yet Obama, child of privilege, attended an exclusive prep school, Ivy League universities, grew up in Hawaii in what amounted to a penthouse with his bank vice-president grandmother, and traveled the world with his well-connected mother. Ocasio-Cortez grew up in ritzy Westchester County, NY, with her architect father, and attended elite Boston University. Salazar lived in a big, beautiful riverfront house in Jupiter, Florida, where each child had his own room and Dad had a six-figure salary. She also attended an Ivy League college, but it’s unknown whether or not she graduated. Both Obama and Salazar claim to have been raised by single mothers, although it’s a stretch. Obama’s mother remarried almost immediately after divorcing his father (her new husband being a member of the Indonesian royal family). Salazar’s father (a pilot) was present in his children’s lives, physically and financially, despite being divorced from their mother. Like Obama, she claims to have been a community “activist.” So many of Soros’s babies are community activists.

Elizabeth Warren and Beto O’Rourke are the odd persons out, but their motivation is obvious. They’re white. Nobody wants to be white, anymore. White isn’t cool. Whites have privilege. Whites are fundamentally and congenitally racist, even if they don’t know it.

Sure, Warren is a woman, but being a white woman is not as sexy as being a woman of color, so Warren has to improvise. Intersectionality is where it’s at. The more “marginalized groups” you can claim to belong to, the better off you are in Progressive Land. It would be easier for Liz to claim to be gay or to suddenly decide to identify as transgender. Nobody can disprove a feeling.

Poor Beto has it even worse than Liz, in a politically correct, intersectional world where diversity privilege rules. Heterosexual white male? Raspberries!

No wonder Donald Trump is president. At least We the People know who he is. Trump has lived most of his life in the public arena. We know who Donald Trump is, warts and all. What you see is what you get.

We know that Trump loves this country, which has allowed him to succeed in life. We also know that he wants to restore this country to its former, pre-Obama greatness, not to fundamentally transform it into a socialist dystopia.

Come November, We the People have the chance to stand up and protect the legacy of President Trump.

We get the government we deserve. It’s up to us–despite mainstream media fake news and the social media blackout of conservative thought–to somehow find ways to get the word out, to educate our fellow citizens about exactly what sort of country these phony progressive candidates plan to create out of our beautiful Republic.

Keep America Great!

Pray for our country and for the future of our Republic.

And VOTE as if your life depended upon it, because it just may.

#####

 

 

106 responses to “The First Birther and Other Prevaricating Democrats

    • How easy is it for them to claim she got death threats? By what means, btw? She scrubbed her social media, so she has no place for people to make threats ON. And somehow, what? Judge Kavanaugh and the Senate committee are responsible? She might have avoided all this had she, you know, reported this to the local police back in 1982.

  1. WOMAN VOWS TO POP TRUMP BALLOON,….. CREATES GOFUNDME FOR BAIL ??? WHAT R THEY REALLY >>>>M A D >….. AT???
    https://www.wsbradio.com/news/national/woman-vows-pop-trump-balloon-creates-gofundme-for-bail/DVRgqGAF3aeIK6yFPFkUiO/

  2. Ford attorney: ‘NOT…… prepared’ to speak at Monday hearing ?????

    Christine Blasey Ford’s attorney Lisa Banks said on CNN on Tuesday that she would not appear at a Monday hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Ford attorney: ‘Not prepared’ to speak at Monday hearing
    The attorney for Christine Blasey Ford said on Tuesday night
    that her client wants an FBI investigation into her accusation that Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her in the 1980s before she testifies before the Senate.

  3. He explained his task is: “Resist everything. … Every level.”

    In the second video, released Wednesday, Allison Hrabar, a Justice Department paralegal, confesses using government-owned software & computers to push a socialist agenda.

    “There’s a lot of talk about how we can like, resist from inside,” she states.

    Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2018/09/2-more-deep-state-radicals-boast-of-undermining-president/#qzlovr65toiyhR1h.99

    https://www.wnd.com/2018/09/2-more-deep-state-radicals-boast-of-undermining-president/

    • The two O’Keefe has found so easily are probably just the tip of the iceberg. There are literally hundreds of thousands of such public employees. DC is FULL of them, and they all believe they’re invincible and untouchable. So, btw, does Rosenstein, but we shall see.

  4. MOTUS A.D.
    REFLECTIONS FROM MOTUS: THE MIRROR OF THE UNITED STATES

    Christine Blasey Ford: “I’m sorry, I have a conflict.”
    Surprise, surprise, surprise: the woman accusing Judge Kavanaugh of attempted rape in the summer of ‘82 now says she won’t be testifying in
    front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday because “it’s N O T .. Enough time.”
    Most people would think that 36 Years is long enough to get your story straight. So forgive me for concluding that the woman’s 11th hour allegations might be driven by motives other than justice.

    ? So she won’t be showing up for the hearing because she has a previous commitment. ???? Or she has to wash her hair.?

    • So wait! You mean she didn’t have her story straight back in August when she sat for the polygraph test? She hasn’t got it down pat even yet, after having a lawyer since August, after having talked to the WaPo via their tip line, after writing to her own Congresswoman as well as Feinstein, after mulling this over with her husband (and therapist) since 2012? What’s to prepare for IF YOU’RE TELLING THE TRUTH? She has to have acting lessons, that’s what has to happen. Coaching. Using videotape to rehearse every possible question that can be thrown at her. Her problem is that she has NO IDEA what the committee has found on her. Such as, do they have her now-deleted social media posts? Hmmm?

    • Her motive for not testifying under oath? Hmm. Now what might that be? Too late. As I say in my new post, that bell can’t be unrung. SUBPOENA HER. And every damned allegation better jibe perfectly and there’s no changing stories. Prior inconsistent statements and all that.

  5. ~ Heather
    https://yournewswire.com/kavqanaugh-accuser-brother-fusion-gps/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

    More of the same from the swamp.
    ~ Heather
    Via Republican Security Council:
    Meet Debra Katz, by Michael Collesano
    She is the lawyer representing Christina Ford who will soon testify against Brett Kavanugh at the Senate Judiciary Committee.
    Katz is a board member of POGO, a George Soros organization.

    She calls Trump supporters “miscreants”. In March 2017, Katz declared via Facebook that, “These people are all miscreants. The term ‘basket of deplorables’ is far too generous a description.”

    Katz appeared on talk shows defending Bill Clinton against accusations lodged by Paula Jones. So apparently political ideology is the litmus test of credibility as far as Katz is concerned.

    She said of Paula Jones “Clearly a one-time incident that took place in 10 to 12 minutes, she was not forced to have sex, she left on her own volition, the courts increasingly are finding that that is not enough to create a sexually hostile work environment claim.”

    Ford’s parents had Kavanaugh’s mother preside over their 1996 foreclosure that ended badly for them.

    Ford’s B R O -ther worked for 15 years at the law firm which represents
    Fusion GPS which produced the fake Russian Dossier

    Just had to post this from a f b page — so now everyone knows who’s who
    in the latest pile of crap.

    • Isn’t that the truth? It’s Kavanaugh who’s now being gang raped by the DemoncRATS.

      THIS ONE! “Make opponents live up to their own book of rules.”

      The Republicans need to start doing this, beginning with the progressive meme that “children” (like up to age 26) are not responsible for what they do because their brains are not yet fully formed. Remember that one? MAKE THEM OWN IT.

  6. These R the same People who 4 more than 20 years …^^^^^
    Gave Bill Clinton
    a pass. <<<<>>> Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama <<<<

  7. 2 often the Left has begun to take the principles of that Machiavellian Marxist community organizer from Chicago, Saul Alinsky (1909-1972), & apply them to virtually every position of political power. Alinsky studied organized crime & was in effect tutored by Al Capone’s successor,
    Frank Nitti—the boss of Chicago’s chief crime mob—& he had great influence on … >>>> Hillary Clinton & Barack Obama <<<<

    • OMG. What a rag–venue AND author. RAGS, both. Who doesn’t respect the institutions of our country? Who puts “democracy” over REPUBLIC? That’s a biggie. This witch (and I apologize to all witches for lumping them with that b-word), this witch has the gall to call for the abolition of the electoral college. Now what is the electoral college but an institution DESIGNED TO PROTECT MINORITY RIGHTS? We do NOT have one huge “democracy,” with one huge popular vote. We have 50 independent STATES in this REPUBLIC. That’s WHY there’s an electoral college. But the DemoncRATS, who basically control academia, make sure NOT to teach the FACTS about our REPUBLIC and our CONSTITUTION and the GENIUS of our system to the younger people whom they want to vote IN LOCKSTEP FOR DEMONCRATS. Again, what a rag. (Apologies to rags.)

  8. F B I ….. PRO’s-TECT that DIRTY ROTTEN FILTHY “SWAMP” !!!!!
    http://www.trevorloudon.com/2018/09/how-the-fbi-protects-the-swamp/

    • IF they don’t release what the POTUS ORDERED them to release, and soon, then the POTUS had better fire the lot of them ASAP, including Sessions. I keep remember all those cozy photos of Sessions with Hillary, as if they were BFFs. Now we hear Trump talk about how Sessions was the first to come out for him (was HE also part of the insurance policy?) and how Sessions literally begged for the position of AG. Was he a plant? Did he know all along he’d recuse in favor of Rosenstein so Rosenstein could continue the insurance policy and Sessions, by recusing, could ensure that Trump would never be able to investigate Clinton OR Obama? That’s the upshot, so far. I don’t see Sessions doing ANYTHING to hold the FBI/DOJ scofflaws accountable.

    • I didn’t realize Kavanaugh’s alleged role in the cover-up of VF’s death. Hmmm. All I do know is that we definitely need one, if not two, more conservative (read: Scalia-like, strict constructionists) on the SCOTUS or else our Republic is LOST. They protected the Clintons then and are still doing so now. They’re also protecting the Obamas now. Is it because they have a misguided sense of what’s “good” for the country, to protect the (fantasy) legacies of these people? To hide from We the People the truth about how corrupt those administrations have been?

  9. ~ Heather ….@ drkates.. …… MICHELLE WHO<? B GONE'…???
    November 11, 2018 at 12:58 pm
    https://www.conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/michelle-obama-infertility-miscarriage.htm?utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=ci1&bt_ee=bn/jhvrEAPJ9+H/UnuccsTjJ7pGNlGGUueBknLebtKTN1XrnQJQCKTPs142lhyU6&bt_ts=1541943197586&utm_source=boomtrain&utm_medium=automated&utm_campaign=ci1&bt_ee=b2dMDc0x4dCBDoujw2RtO5PTWYnvZYBzK3KBFwP1bFJueF%2Bo3lSR%2F6g2sIJJPuln&bt_ts=1541943197532

    hmm interesting not sure if I believe this story about infertility.

    drkate
    are they doing everything they can to hide the fact that she is a he?
    Sounds more likely. why now?

    Heather
    Exactly why now & still today the girls look nothing like him or her. so
    She had a miscarriage & opted for Invitro instead of trying again–I find that strange…yrs ago I had a miscarriage through a tubal pregnancy & never
    had a problem getting pregnant after that…all went back to normal & I had
    a healthy baby 2 yrs later so she is full of crap.

    In that video clip where she is walking with the host She walks like a man–She looks like shes very bow legged. watch the walk. And why haven’t we ever seen baby pictures of these girls until She posted a few in this book……hmmmm

    • It’s not what they say; it’s what they don’t say and how they say what they do say to leave an incorrect impression and lead you to incorrect assumptions. I DO think the kids look like them, which does NOT preclude one being the biological parent of each girl. One apiece. Sperm donors. Egg donors. Surrogate mother. I totally believe in the infertility issue, which becomes obvious when you think about it. I also believe there could have been a miscarriage–by someone, early on, which was devastating to the “couple” who were “expecting” the child of the surrogate. I also believe it’s entirely possible, in fact LIKELY, that someone had to have hormone injections and still does to this day. Not that there’s ANYTHING wrong with it except the LYING about it. If someone unfortunately is born a certain way and must somehow deal with it, then more power to them in doing whatever is necessary to “fix” the situation. However, be up front about it and don’t CONTINUE the lies. Come out of the closet, iow. How can you be an advocate for LGBTQ+ and HIDE facts? btw, JUST LIKE HILLARY, Moo claims she would NEVER, EVER run for political office. Right.

      Why are they doing everything to hide the facts? What other choice do they have after lying for a decade or more? This is misdirection and spin, just like the intense focus on Moo’s “toned biceps” was intended to head off questions about them and “answer” the questions by saying in advance that “she” was just so FIT and ACTIVE (to take a phrase from Aldi). Answer the question BEFORE it’s asked to misdirect from the other more obvious answer.

      Good point from Heather about miscarrying and then opting for in vitro. That’s a non sequitur. Was the miscarriage caused by “infertility” or was it an anatomical anomaly? In which case, in vitro carried by the original mother who miscarried wouldn’t solve the problem. Does she mention that it was in vitro with a SURROGATE carrying the embryos?

      I’ve seen a photo somewhere of her walking a kid in a stroller, which proves nothing. Them being friends with genetic experts who are ob/gyns means that whatever laws might have been involved way back when, they wouldn’t matter when you have the means and the ability to do an end run around the laws. Not that I know what laws were extant then, but nevertheless–legalities would not apply when you’re friends with such individuals who can “help.” What we’ve never seen are photos of Moo pregnant. In addition, no photos of Barry’s mom preggers, either. So curious.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s