The Strzok and Page Show

This week, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok are both scheduled to be questioned by the representatives of We the People. This should be interesting.

Page will be questioned tomorrow:

The House Judiciary Committee has subpoenaed former FBI lawyer Lisa Page to appear for a private interview on Wednesday, according to two people familiar with the subpoena.

Unfortunately, we’re not going to be privy to her likely very interesting interview.

Page’s alleged lover, Peter Strzok, is supposed to appear publicly on Thursday before the House Judiciary Committee as well as the House Oversight Committee. Strzok’s attorney has asked for a transcript of the answers Strzok gave previously, in an 11-hour interview that was not public.

Doesn’t Strzok remember what he said before? It should be easy, provided he was telling the truth instead of just making things up. Is Strzok afraid of a perjury trap? Does he have to bone up on whatever it was he obfuscated about before?

It must be disconcerting and uncomfortable to be on the other side of the table for a change. Here they all were hoping to get the President in a perjury trap. Rats!

With luck, we’ll learn something new about this witch hunt of an attempted coup.

With luck, we’ll find out exactly when the “counterintelligence investigation” of now-President Trump really began.

When, how, why.

And who. Let’s never forget the who.

We the People need to know who instigated the unsavory, corrupt “insurance policy” designed to “stop” Donald Trump from becoming president.

ALL of the whos in Deep State Whoville must be revealed.

Today, President Trump threw a little shade at the ersatz “lovers”:

Out of sight but not out of mind as the President is off to Europe, to do a little more shaking things up!

The oversight our representatives exercise this week MUST be as piercing and as devastating as Gort’s.

May the Force be with them and may they get to the bottom of the real collusion once and for all. The future of our Republic depends upon it.

Deep State versus We the People of the USA.

The real War of the Worlds.


145 responses to “The Strzok and Page Show

  1. INDICTMENT: U.S. v. Viktor Borisovich Netyksho, et al… @ DRUDGE!
    Accused of stealing usernames, passwords…
    Podesta breached…
    Russian firm used in Maryland election systems…
    State officials meet amid security concerns…
    Special counsel pushing for info on WIKILEAKS, sources…
    Roger Stone says he’s ‘US person’ in indictment…


    • He didn’t do anything because he knew it was all a lie and a campaign narrative. To actually do something would mean accusing the Russians falsely and making an international incident over something that was just MADE UP by the Clinton campaign and her minions in the Deep State and the media.

      They were in deep shit because of Hillary’s private server; the fact that it held classified information; the fact that everything sent using it was being copied/forwarded to a foreign entity (Pakistan, perhaps?); the fact that those emails exposed by Wikileaks and DC Leaks and the others did NOT come from any hacking (whether it was via the shadowed server, Seth Rich, or the Awans); the fact that the emails were on Weiner’s laptop (!); the fact that all this was being discovered and stopped by Rogers right before the Russia/collusion meme began, meaning the fact that the “about queries” being run against the FISA database by DNC-connected, FBI-connected CONTRACTORS were stopped suddenly (meaning all the people involved in it were at risk of exposure of their treasonous behavior)–all the aforementioned facts probably as well as others not yet revealed, meant that they ALL had to suddenly destroy/wipe/lose EVERY server and device that might contain the evidence of what they did.

      In addition, they had to invent a “plausible” narrative to use against Trump, which would also serve to create a permanent, on-going “counter-intelligence investigation” that would (they hoped) ensure that NONE of what they were doing/did could/would ever be exposed. This was their “insurance policy” and part of it was getting CrowdStrike (one of the complicit contractors, run by a guy who worked previously for Mueller (!), funded by Google and a company connected to Geithner (!)) to help destroy the evidence that would show how the emails REALLY were lost to Wikileaks; to help plant or create or just lie about “evidence” that Russia did it; and to help obfuscate the truth by refusing to let the FBI even look at the server (if the FBI even asked to look at it, which is in dispute. DNC says they didn’t ask; Comey said they asked multiple times but were refused.)

      In any case, neither the FBI nor anybody could ever look at it because the DNC/DCCC/Clinton deliberately destroyed all the hardware. They made a copy of the DATA, but not the software or the history (metadata, etc.) on the original server that would be the evidence showing how the email was lost.

      But in any case, we KNOW that it was downloaded on a device inserted into the server, NOT via any Internet hack/connection. This we know. So it was not spear-phishing OR a hack.

      With Podesta, we knew all along that it was his own weak password. Everybody who’s fallen for those hackers who spear-phish is NOT a victim of “the Russians.” Yes, maybe at some point he fell for a spear-phishing ploy, but that doesn’t mean that the guys who got into his email are the ones who copied and passed on his email for publication. Actually, there’s probably no evidence that he ever was spear-phished in the first place.

      There’s no evidence cited in the indictment at all, and that’s because there IS no evidence. A Grand Jury can and will indict the proverbial ham sandwich. It’s hardly likely that any DC Grand Jury has the wherewithal to understand computer hacking. They were likely presented with the same stupid intelligence report that claimed that “the Russians” done it!

      We know they weren’t shown EVIDENCE, because THERE IS NO EVIDENCE. It may be that the FBI introduced the complicit, politically-connected, DemoncRAT contractor’s analysis that “the Russians” done it. That’s not evidence. There’s no chain of custody. There’s no evidence that Crowdstrike can even show to prove their opinion. And their opinions have been proven WRONG before and they had to rescind them because they were wrong and they just made things up!

      So we know that they can (and have) just made things up in the past. We know that the ability for the GRU to hack was invented by our “intel community” and basically given to the hackers. We know that people like Crowdstrike as well as the Deep State are perfectly able to rig up any “evidence” they want to on “metadata” or anything else digital, without leaving tracks. THIS is what they did.

      And it was ALL to hide the treason that was coming out. Strzok admitted that some in the “intel community” made decisions about whether to “investigate” something or not investigate it based upon POLL NUMBERS! So much for patriotism.

      If they were so concerned about foreign actors interfering in our election, then why let the Awans off the hook? Why not pursue the foreign people to whom everything from Hillary’s server was being copied? Why not pursue Christopher Steele, Halper (dual citizen?), and the other FOREIGNERS who were colluding with Fusion GPS and the FBI to spy on the Trump campaign.

      Oh, wait! That’s because, according to the NY Times, Halper was SENT TO SPY ON TRUMP’S CAMPAIGN. That’s a little tidbit/truth that I read today for the first time:

      “During the summer of 2016, the F.B.I. sent an informant to meet with two Trump campaign advisers after the bureau had received information that the two men had suspicious contacts linked to Russia. The informant, Stefan Halper, an American academic who teaches at Cambridge University in England, had meetings with both Carter Page and George Papadopoulos to gain a better understanding of their contacts with Russians.”

      Whoops! Accidentally told the truth.

      Did the Deep State ever admit that they SENT Halper? Weren’t we supposed to believe he was just a guy who happened to run across these Trump campaign guys and then happened to learn this disturbing possibility that these Trump people were maybe “colluding” with Russians and so he, being patriotic, passed the info on to the FBI? Not that the FBI SENT HIM to spy on Page and Papadopoulos?

      I love it how these guys who get their marching orders from the Deep State sometimes get carried away and tell truths they’re not really supposed to tell.

      And so now you have to ask this question, after recalling that supposedly the counter-intel investigation didn’t start until the last day of July 2016. If Halper was SENT to spy on Page and Papadopoulos AFTER July 31, 2016, then what made that other guy, the Russian FBI informant with the Jewish made up name, go spy on Stone and Caputo BEFORE July 31, 2016?

  2. Will justice be served?


    • Yeah, but now they’ve chalked up more scalps. The Papa John guy, undeservedly so, a la Mark Fuhrmann. And then that guy who refused to take a coupon, the black woman threatened him, he called the police and now HE’S fired.

  4. A White person making this kind of comment about any other racial group would lose his job, probably his business, & certainly his reputation. However, the left has created a cult that rewards hatred, hypocrisy, delusion, & destruction of those outside the cult. We are witnessing dangerous & psychotic mass hysteria.
    Those of us who still live in the real world must be vigilant. YES SIR!

  5. Ron Unz’s 1993 satire remains one of my all time favorite pieces of political humor. Read the whole thing. ….^^^^^ FUN READ …

  6. A Trump dossier was published to the public and it was quickly deemed to be a load of crap by most thinking people. …..^^^^^^^
    I wish that were true. Mueller is using it as a road map to investigate Trump. Unfortunately, not very many people have taken the time to read the 35 page dossier. I suggest that everyone read it to gain an understanding of what is going on. The Dems claim most of it has been verified. The FBI used it to initiate a FISA warrant on Carter Page and to monitor the Trump campaign and transition teams as well as the Trump administration as a sitting President.
    Mueller and the Dems are moving heaven and earth to seek verification of the dossier. It is their only hope of justifying what they have done. Look at the references in the dossier to Manafort and Michael Cohen. Does anyone think the Mueller hardball tactics on both of them is not related to what is said about them in the dossier? They are being squeezed to verify the allegations in the dossier against them.
    Trump Dossier

  7. Award-Winning Investigative Reporter Sharyl Attkisson
    Exposes 10 Blatant LIES …. Corrupt FBI Investigator Peter Strzok
    Wants Us … to Believe

    President Trump Calls Election-Rigging FBI Agent Peter Strzok a
    ‘Disgrace to Our Country’ ….YES HE IS!!!!!!

    DNC Chair Ducks, Dodges & Weaves When Asked if DNC Turned Over ‘Hacked’ Servers to the FBI …@ LibertyDaily

  8. I hear that Hillary is planning a second presidential run in 2020
    so for anybody who needs a pretty good primer on hrc then here is one:
    From the link:
    Former CIA Officer and whistleblower Kevin Shipp says what Hillary Clinton did with her charity and Uranium One while she was Secretary of State was a crime for the history books. Shipp explains, “Hillary Clinton used this to launder money in foreign banks so it wasn’t subject to U.S. laws, congressional subpoenas or FOIA demands for the evidence. This was done to launder this money globally into the Clinton Foundation so the U.S. government could not examine it at all.”

    Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller was the head of the FBI while the Uranium One deal was being done by Clinton and the Russians. One fifth of U.S. uranium production was bought by the Russians in a deal Clinton pushed and approved. The Clinton Foundation received more than $140 million from some of the same Russian players who were involved with Uranium One. Why didn’t Mueller stop the deal? Shipp says, “Mueller is either a complete moron, which he is not, or he overlooked the biggest counterterrorism cases in U.S. history. It involved Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, Uranium One and, of course, the destruction of all the emails and evidence and her secret server, and on and on and on it goes, and he (Mueller) ignored it all.”

    How did she get away with obvious crime? Shipp says, “The most bizarre thing is the people who protected her from clear felonious activity and violations of the Espionage Act. James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, was protecting her and leaking things to the media and lying. You had John Brennan, Director of the CIA, protecting her by starting a false investigation (on Trump) and stirring things up with this (false/unverified) dossier. You had James Comey, Director of the FBI, protecting her. . . . Then, you’ve got Peter Strzok protecting her, and now it appears the United Kingdom GCHQ was using NSA information to target Donald Trump and protect Hillary Clinton. You have to ask yourself what kind of power or connections does this woman have to get all of these members of the Deep State, Shadow Government to risk their own criminal penalties to protect her and try to get her elected? That is the Shadow Government. That is the Deep State. That is what is so chilling about this whole thing. . . . This is deep. This is dark. This is as dark as it gets, and this is the biggest espionage case involving government officials in the history of this country.”
    There’s also an entertaining video
    Towards the end of that video, Mr. Schipp predicts the next big thing is the indictments coming from the emails contained on the Weiner laptop.

    • Thanks for that link. Here’s a key piece: ” the United Kingdom GCHQ was using NSA information to target Donald Trump and protect Hillary Clinton.”

      Just as Judge Napolitano said. Insiders told him so and it certainly rings true, especially knowing what we know now. It’s getting serious now. The complicit ones are calling on the Deep State, the SHADOW GOVERNMENT, to stage a coup and overthrow Trump. AS IF they’re not doing it already. They scream about how he doesn’t believe the intel community. But do you even think they’re TELLING HIM everything they claim to know even IF there were evidence? They have said that they would and they probably ARE keeping things from him, keeping him from being president, from doing his job, right now. They believe they have that power and authority. They are smug, self-righteous, and self-appointed pricks. Sorry for the language but you can tell from their body language and their words that they believe they are saving us from ourselves. Or at least that’s how they rationalize to themselves their TREASON. We the People RULE in this country. They don’t. Even the president doesn’t. WE ELECTED the man who is the president and who under the Constitution has the power to run foreign affairs AND the executive branch, but these people IN the executive branch believe they are right to usurp his power and it’s ALL to cover up what they themselves have done or the people they support politically have done. Justice cannot be meted out to them soon enough. They’re desperate now. That’s why things are suddenly so out of control. Pray for our president.

      • I say something and then boom! Something comes up to prove what I’ve said or suspected:

        “In light of Mr. Trump’s comments about the intelligence community, Mr. Brennan said “there very well might be” a shift in the covert community to “withhold vital intelligence” in order to protect that information.

        “Dan Coats and Gina Haspel need to be on top of their game now and speak truth to power,” he said, referring to Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and CIA Director Gina Haspel. “And make sure Trump doesn’t get away with this.” …”

        THIS is what Brennan thinks should happen NOW, when he’s not in the government anymore and when different people (Trump’s people) ARE in the government, so what do you think he did when he WAS in the government, between the time of Trump’s announcement of his candidacy and when Trump took office and Brennan left? Besides that, do you believe that the minions that were Brennan’s, who are still in the government, might be answering to Brennan and Obama still, and doing what they suggested, which is KEEPING INFORMATION FROM TRUMP, allegedly because he’s a “colluder” but more likely because they don’t want him to KNOW what criminal acts, what treasonous acts, they possibly did? Imagine an employee of the president believing he has the right, indeed the obligation, to hide from the PRESIDENT OF THE USA, no matter who that person is, information that the Constitution puts into the hands OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA AND ONLY THAT PERSON? Imagine the gall of John Brennan. He says this openly, suggesting basically that treason is patriotic. That he and those who think like him have a right, a DUTY, to usurp the power of the elected president of this country. The man should be in prison (after a “fair” trial, of course). We already know that Obama discussed with his “intelligence community” how they could keep information from Trump as president-elect and, the way I read it, even AFTER he was sworn in.

  9. I saw a little bit of “news” this morning in which various “experts” were brought on to tell me that they didn’t know what plan the President might have, and that they were pretty sure that anything that happened would probably not be good although they had no actual idea what that might be.
    They all pretty much agreed that the President wasn’t folowing their advice on how to meet with Mr. Putin.

    How did we ever get to the point of watching such nincompoops pretend to be competent to tell me how to think and what to believe?

    These were the approved talking points from, iiuc, the deep state:

    begin snip:
    But, at least in his public remarks at the outset, he mentioned none of the issues that have lately brought US-Russian relations to the lowest point since the Cold War: Moscow’s annexation of territory from Ukraine, its support for Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, as well as Western accusations that it poisoned a spy in England and meddled in elections.
    I just got back from a vacation on a cruise ship. You had to sit for dinner with other people – not my favorite thing, but nobody that I talked to believed the latest novichuk poisoning story had anything to do with Russia.
    Everybody said two people finding a bottle in the park and then getting sick and dying was so ridiculous they could not imagine it happening.
    Just sayin’ you can put it on the news, but people might not believe it.

    Looking at the druge site, he seems to have flipped to the libs side.
    Don’t matter, you can be Matt Druge, Ms Hollywood Celebrity Superstar,
    some Super Wealthy Silicon Valley Accidental Billionaire at the Gates,
    or any top end news anchor you want,

    I suspect your time is over. Just one of them hunch things.

    • Hey, Dave M! I do value your input and the take you have on things from the other side of the Pond. I had a similar gut feeling about that poisoning. WTF is up with that? It certainly makes NO SENSE whatsoever for those people to be poisoned. Of course, our media barely covers it, so I haven’t a clue what the latest news is. Last I heard, they found a bottle that was contaminated in the people’s house? Are they absolutely positive it’s not just fentanyl, like is poisoning first responders over here, when people who overdose on it are touched or given CPR?

      I just found this but haven’t read and digested it yet: It was in a perfume bottle? WHY would it be? Where would it have come from? Isn’t it odd how absolutely STUPID these evil, clever Russians are to conveniently leave their fingerprints all over the place, like in metadata when they’re “hacking” or by using a nerve agent that ONLY THEY have? I mean, wouldn’t fentanyl have worked as well, if the goal is simply to take somebody out? It would have the added benefit of not pointing right back at them and people would maybe just think the victims were addicts or something? I mean, it gets ridiculous.

      I do NOT believe the Russian state hacked the DNC/DCCC/Podesta/Clinton, NOR do I believe they killed these people in the UK. WHATEVER is going on has something to do with the UK and Clinton, in collusion, and maybe has something to do with that guy who Putin now says gave $400 million to Clinton. Here’s another that I only skimmed but look! They’re (NY Times) blaming the SAME PEOPLE for the hacks and for the poisoning. It makes no sense.

      Look how they call the “hack” a “sophisticated operation.” THERE WAS NOTHING SOPHISTICATED about it. It was amateurish, which is one way you know it was NOT Putin, who is, if nothing else, very professional at what he does. There’s something very, very dirty about Ukraine, Clinton, Obama, Syria, and the UK. Collusion of some sort. People making a lot of money. Follow the money, always.

      I agree with you about Drudge. Try this one instead, which Zenway tipped us to:

      I also wonder what foreign country it was to which all of Hillary’s email were copied. Therein lies a tale.

  10. ^^^ …. ….. As for Russian customs, Lyudmila advised:

    “You must Always listen Between the Words & Read between the lines.”

  11. What did Putin get from OBAMA? ???? O’ ….^^^^^
    1. A free hand in Georgia
    2. A free hand in Syria
    3. The betrayal of Poland vis a vis the missile shield
    4. The betrayal of Ukraine by refusing to provide its governor with useful weapons
    5. A whole bunch of our uranium via Uranium One
    6. A deal allowing Russia’s Iranian allies to go nuclear
    7. Failure to do anything about the same Russian actions that the media is now blaming Trump for. Instead his administration actually issued a stand down order.

    What has Trump given to Putin? Nothing. He’s come to the defense of Poland & Ukraine when Obama wouldn’t.

    If this is the media’s metric for treason, then >>> Obama is a Traitor. <<<
    OBAMA …. not only praised Putin, he Promised to make a sweetheart
    … Deal with Russia …..After the election was Over. …YES HE DID!

  12. Putin also seemed to Suggest that the American election may have been Compromised by George SOROS, the Billionaire Hungarian-American financier. Soros, who is Jewish, is a favorite target of far-right elements in both Europe & the United States.

    • Gee, ya think? I think Putin knows way more than We the People do about how all this witch hunt went down. I’m very interested in his allegation that Hillary got $400 million from Russia for her campaign (uh, we KNOW that’s illegal, but so is a private server and destroying evidence). What does Putin know and when did he know it? He also said that intelligence officers from the U.S. played a role in the transfer. Now, let’s take a wild guess who those people might be …


    • Trump isn’t the ONLY American who questions that “intelligence community” one-sided, privately-conducted and unusually written “report” that THE RUSSIANS DONE IT. We who supported Trump and SEE THIS WITCH HUNT for what it is suspect that that report is nothing more than political BS. Here are a few pieces of evidence to support our suspicions versus the “report” from Brennan, Comey, Clapper, Rice, Obama:

      1. Strzok. Enough said.
      2. DNC server wiped, then destroyed, and never confiscated by the FBI.
      3. Unmasking, dissemination of “intel” across the government to ensure leaks to media, complicit media repeat Russian narrative ad nauseum.
      4. Reid and Schiff. Just watch and listen.
      5. DOJ/FBI STONEWALLING. Rosenstein and Mueller. Watch and listen.
      6. Clinton “exoneration”.
      7. Awans off the hook, along with DWS.
      8. Clinton emails “missing” and server bleach-bitted and phones hammered to smithereens.

      Who are treasonous? We the People KNOW.

      • Ya know, when Trump returns he should immediately fire Sessions and then the rest will follow. A new Attorney General will NOT have to recuse, but of course they’re already saying that should Kavanaugh be confirmed, he should recuse from anything to do with Trump, simply because he was nominated by Trump. Did that apply for Kagan and Sotomayor during the Obama administration? OF COURSE NOT. This has been a slow-rolling coup for the past two years and now they’re even trying to speed it up by calling Trump carrying out foreign policy and meeting with foreign leaders “treasonous” and asking “where is the military” and talking about how the “shadow government” needs to act. They’re THAT AFRAID that truth will out. One has to think that they didn’t want him to meet with Putin because who knows what truths Putin may have to share about THEM–the traitors in our midst.

        Rand Paul was on video yesterday talking about how Russia (and other countries) ALWAYS try to interfere in our elections, JUST AS WE ALWAYS INTERFERE IN THEIR ELECTIONS. It was, in fact, because Hillary directly interfered in elections to do with Russia and Ukraine that Putin hates her in the first place. Look at all the interfering we’ve done over the decades. Not just interfering in elections but actually overthrowing duly elected governments.

        You have to ask what the reporter was smoking to have written this sentence:

        “But Mr. Trump’s statements at the news conference were a remarkable break with his administration, which on Friday indicted 12 Russian intelligence officers for cyberattacks …”

        HIS ADMINISTRATION indicted the Russians? Hardly. It was Mueller and Rosenstein, two rogue guys over which Trump has no apparent authority or over which he refuses to exercise the authority the Constitution and We the People gave him. Of course, they’re PUSHING HIM to fire them so that then they can scream he’s obstructing justice and then all the RINOs and GOPe (see them deserting today) will vote, they hope, to impeach him.

  14. Hi Miri,
    you understand the novichuk caper and especially the timing. The story has dropped out of the news (just like Las Vegas) and who knows if it will reappear?
    The fury of the deep state is amazing to behold this morning. Apparently that rogue Trump refused the trap that they had set for him. I fear for his life today.

    Here’s the best in-depth coverage of an earlier poisoning story, you will remember it. The blogger was A.J. Strata, a Nasa systems analyst, who had a keen interest in using science as a detective to understand politics.
    Sadly Mr. Strata has died, but his blog is still there, so check it out while you can. He is fascinating and even exciting reading:

    Remember that one? Polonium and that too meant only the russians could have done it.

    • Well, I’m surprised I understand it given how little was reported and the BS that was contained in what little was reported. It just simply makes no sense. Did you hear about the Secret Service agent who dropped dead on the Scottish links the other day? That’s horrible and may he rest in peace but given what you said about fearing for Trump’s life, you almost have to wonder if he was the victim of something meant for someone else. I don’t ever forget how Breitbart left us, under such mysterious circumstances.

      And then there are those people in the UK who apparently were poisoned with something. What was it and WHY would anyone poison those apparently innocent people? (Not that the Russian victims were not innocent, although who really knows why they were poisoned, either? Putin doesn’t strike me as the kind of guy who’d go after people like that so many years later, especially leaving “tracks” in such a sloppy fashion.)

      I didn’t know (or maybe forgot that) Mr. Strata died. That’s sad. May he RIP, too. I used to read him, too. I’ll read up on Litvinenko. Thanks for the link.

  15. So too do the American people, & so do sane analysts respond to the Rosenstein indictments & the Mueller investigation into collusion with the Russians. If anybody was colluding with the Russians – & we haven’t even Touched the Hillary-DNC financing of the Dossier used to spy on Hillary’s political opponent – it was the likes of Donna Brazile, Susan Rice, & one Barack Hussein Obama.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

    • Yes, and why? Could it be because (1) the “hacker” wasn’t a hacker, (2) the “hacker” was planting or changing info instead of taking it, or (3) they already knew or didn’t want to know who the “hacker” was and what the “hacker” was doing?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s