Monday Medley

Today we present a hodgepodge of items of variable interest. First topic, the obvious: the supercilious James Comey has laughably pronounced that President Trump is

morally unfit to be president.

This, coming from a known liar and self-admitted unethical (and illegal) leaker. What’s that old rule of thumb?

Judge not, that ye be not judged.

For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.

On second thought, Jim, judge away. We wait with bated breath your own just due.

Here’s good news. It seems that the more some people judge President Trump and find him wanting, the more people flock to the president’s side:  Trump’s job approval now stands at 51%. Americans do seem to hate witch hunts.

You gotta love stories like this one. Imagine someone spending years training an attack dog, only to have that now-well-trained beast bite its master in his own behind.

Free Pride Glasgow, which bills itself as being a “non-commercial” and more open-minded alternative to the traditional Glasgow LGBT pride events, is taking drastic steps to prevent the oppression of marginalized peoples, banning drag queens from its annual parade.

After extensive consideration, the Free Pride Glasgow committee members decided that having men dressed as women giving stellar performances during the event would be offensive to transgender individuals, and that non-binary people within their ranks would be “uncomfortable with having drag performances.” …

Ever hear anyone from the LGBT “community” express concern that drag queen performances are “offensive” to women or make women feel “uncomfortable?”

Cognitive dissonance: How hard it must be to be progressive.

Finally, the inimitable and stable genius James Woods asked a question after our own hearts:

Unsurprisingly, nobody (so far) has met the challenge. The comments show only the usual (perhaps) photoshopped images that were rife during the Obama years. No convincing evidence supplied yet. Nobody who remembers sitting in class with Barry Soetoro.

Of course, we here at WTPOTUS still await a real birth certificate.


129 responses to “Monday Medley

  1. This is a must see – many topics…. many answers

  2. What a lovely thing!

    • How sweet and thoughtful she is. I’ll bet she bonds with those people at the WH because she didn’t come from wealth and privilege, like so many do, including BO and MO.

  3. blood ? Thanks once again ~ “OBAMA” YES U BUILT THIS Mess!

  4. On Thursday, a gunman Shot & Killed Sheriff’s Deputies …. ^^^^^
    Sgt. Noel Ramirez, 30,
    & Deputy Taylor Lindsey, 25, …. ( BLESS these BRAVE PEOPLE..)
    while the two Officers were EAT-ing in a Chinese restaurant. The gunman was later found dead near the scene of what police are calling an ambush.

    There is no clear motive ????? O’ NONE??? …. for the attack. ha’


    Schultz called Ramirez & Lindsey ….. “the Best of the Best.”

    “They were men of integrity, men of loyalty,” he said. “They were God-fearing, & they loved what they did, & we are very proud of them.”

    Schultz said he rushed to the scene, & then had the difficult task of calling the families of Ramirez, who is survived by his wife & 2 young children,
    & Lindsey, who joined the sheriff’s office in 2013.

  6. And we shall not forget:
    2012 A.D.

    • It’s so unbelievable, isn’t it? And yet it’s all true but nothing done about it. Not even really reported in the Deep State media. Today, though, there’s an article about the large number of muslims running for office, most as DemoncRATS, this election season.

  7. Monday Medley Timeline

    Succotash and Squash with a side of Steamed Prunes

  8. Just the facts, Ma’am. No need to sign up.

    Two of A Kind
    U.S. Attorneys Patrick Fitzgerald of Chicago and James Comey of Manhattan are both tough-minded career prosecutors. They’re also best friends.

    By Alison Frankel | December 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM

    • Oh he did, did he?

      President Clinton fired FBI Director William Sessions on 19 July 1993, one day before Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster, a longtime associate of the Clintons, was found dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

      • session
        [sesh-uh n]

        Word Origin
        late 14c., “periodical sitting of a court,” from Old French session “act or state of sitting; assembly,” from Latin sessionem (nominative sessio) “act of sitting; a seat; loitering; a session,” noun of action from past participle stem of sedere “to sit” (see sedentary ). Sense of “period set aside for some activity” is first recorded 1920, in bull session, probably from quarter sessions courts (see quarter (n.)). Musical sense of “recording occasion in a studio” is from 1927.

        1. the sitting together of a court, council, legislature, or the like, for conference or the transaction of business: Congress is now in session.

        2. a single continuous sitting, or period of sitting, of persons so assembled.

        3. a continuous series of sittings or meetings of a court, legislature, or the like.

        4. a crock of bullpuckies.

        • So he’s very well named. Sitting. Sitting. Sitting. Waiting for what? The clock to run out? Oh, wait! I’m talking Jeff, not William. Are those guys related?

      • Pantsuit on fire.

  9. While we were all busy connecting dots at Texas Darlin’s, he was underwriting that other insurance policy.

    Grab a pen and paper for taking copious notes and a napkin for the buttered popcorn.

  10. Thank you Papoose for all those great links. 😀

  11. Hardly a Stir ….. When $tar–Buck$ ….. Denied a C O P !!!! <<<<<
    By Daniel John Sobieski

    Kudos for Sheriff David Clarke for reminding us of the Double standard practiced by the self-righteous guardians of social justice such as
    ………. $tar– Buck$ , ………… who flagellate themselves in public over
    the injustice of denying non-paying patrons use of their facilities –
    patrons who happen to be B L A C K :

    Not 2 long ago a Philadelphia $tarbucks RE-Fused to LET a police officer
    USE the restroom telling him it was 4…. Paying $$$$$$ …..Customer$.
    WTP …. Don't remember $tarbucks closing 8000 stores for $ensitivity training toward police. ??? …NO NOT …. A PEEP !!!
    STAR? … BLACK ….. S "TAR" BABIES RULE??? 2018??? $$$ WHY???

    • This story makes me believe that the real estate “agents” and their “friend” may have gotten the idea to pull this stunt from the instance of the cop being denied access to the restroom because of the POLICY to not let people use the facilities unless they were customers. So this publicity of the POLICY alerted activists to the possibility of pulling off this stunt. It’s possibly why they refused to buy something (a small coffee, just to be able to use the restroom, since you’re there using their facilities–such as the wi-fi, tables, and chairs?), if they WANTED to be refused. It also potentially explains why they were so “dignified” as they were arrested–the (hypothesized) stunt required them to be ARRESTED, so they played along and made the narrative of the “proud and DIGNIFIED black men” being hassled and profiled by the evil police. Potentially all a stunt. FAKE NEWS. Starbucks and other companies really need to figure out a way to fight back. Iow, consider suing because of the cost such stunts impose. Failing that, the SHAREHOLDERS who lose actual money when such stunts hurt the companies’ bottom lines–they should sue the stunt makers. Discovery would be a piece of cake, in that there will probably be a paper and email and social media TRAIL to follow to prove that it was staged to deliberately hurt the financial stability of that company and to extract reparations. It’s so like all the instances of fake hate that are documented all over the place. The hyped publicity is NEVER equalled by the revelation that it was all faked.

      • I’d be interested to know exactly WHAT they’re going to “teach” the employees about implicit bias. The policy should be followed regardless of the race, color, creed, national origin, sex, gender, or JOB of the person coming in. Are they going to teach them to take into account all those factors and differentially apply the policy BASED SOLEY ON them? IOW, will blacks be allowed to use the restroom while others (white males) must buy something? There was NO IMPLICIT BIAS involved. The policy is straight-forward. If you don’t buy, you can’t stay and use the facilities because paying customers may want to sit at that table! What makes these guys think they have a right to take up space, to trespass? IF there were a pattern of others (non-blacks) being allowed to stay and use the restrooms without buying, then it’s another story. But that’s not what happened. The only thing Starbucks can FAIRLY do is eliminate the policy, allow people to loiter and use the restrooms without being customers, and allow them to crowd out paying customers. Get rid of the policy altogether or enforce it equally. There’s no special status for anyone who MAY be subject to implicit bias. What about white males who are mistreated by black barristas? It’s happened.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s