Photo from this link.
The quote speaks for itself and explains what’s happening today, as the alt-left seeks to destroy the culture and history of the USA, as demanded by this alt-left advocate, among many others:
How does a nation change its history? Ask Orwell. [emphasis added to quotes]
Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.
We as a People cannot forget what our nation is and what our nation was. That, however, is the goal of the alt-left, a goal they must achieve in order to succeed in their dreamed-of fundamental transformation of the USA.
Key to the alt-left’s desire to control every aspect of our lives is overturning the Bill of Rights. After all, how else can they censor the Internet, symbols they don’t like, and speech they oppose?
In the aftermath of violence at a white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, progressive activists nationwide have demanded, and in some cases illegally carried out, the tearing down and removal of statues and monuments to Confederate leaders and soldiers on public space. Now Black Lives Matter activists have gone even further — going so far as to call for a ban on all Confederate imagery — even in private possession. ...
Outlawing all Confederate flags, symbols, statues, and groups would not only be indescribably impractical — taking into account the existence of battlefield monuments, graves, Civil War re-enactors, every single souvenir shop within a 10-mile radius of Gettysburg, historical computer games, and Lynyrd Skynyrd albums — it would also be illegal.
“Even the most liberal Supreme Court justice knows that the remedy to hateful or offensive speech is opposing speech,” Eddie Zipperer, an assistant professor of political science at Georgia Military College, told LifeZette. “This would be a blatant violation of the First Amendment.“
To which the alt-left would answer: We get rid of the Constitution. Problem solved.
Or else–by way of bullying, shaming, and having law enforcement stand down–make wrong think unprotected think, and wrong speech unprotected speech. (Of course, the alt-left gets to determine what’s wrong think and wrong speech.)
Today there is a no-holds-barred battle going on for the future of our country. The mainstream media have taken sides, as have most DC politicians.
President Trump is wrongfully smeared as a racist and an anti-Semite, because he dared to point out that violence was perpetrated by counter-protesters as well as protesters in Charlottesville. He didn’t stick to the script written by those who want to destroy our culture:
The alt-right is wrong and violent; they’re racists and anti-Semites who must be shut up and wiped out.
There is no alt-left. The counter-protesters are peaceful and on the side of all that’s good.
President Trump spoke the truth: The alt-left exists. They’re often violent, mainly because they use violence as a tactic in their war of “resistance” against President Trump and all who elected him. The media deliberately ignore or excuse violence perpetrated by the alt-left.
There are many photos that prove President Trump’s point:
Photo from this link.
Above is a collage showing victims of alt-left violence that occurred at so-called peaceful protests against conservative speakers on college campuses or at Trump rallies, among other events. The collage does not include photos of the worst incidences of alt-left violence: Police officers gunned down (12 shot, 5 killed) at a “peaceful” Black Lives Matter protest in Texas, or the attack on Republicans while they were practicing for a baseball game (also in Virginia).
Photo from this link.
Pictured above are so-called peaceful counter-protesters in Charlottesville attacking the automobile of the man who allegedly ran into another car, causing a 3-car pile-up that resulted in the death of a young woman who was counter-protesting in the street. Indications are that counter-protesters swarmed and hit the man’s car before as well as after the crash, perhaps implicating their own actions in the woman’s death.
The alt-left use other means to do an end run around the Constitution and everyone’s right to free speech. They enlist supposedly non-partisan monitors who find and label “hate groups,” often defining political opponents as such and then enlisting monopolistic social media sites like Google and Youtube to censor their opponents’ speech. For example:
Google is becoming the filthy demon we always knew it was and now they demonetized 95% of the videos Diamond and Silk uploaded on Youtube, basically rendering their Adsense account completely useless, just because of supporting Donald Trump. … The good news is that they have vowed revenge against the giant monopolist Google. They vowed to start a class action lawsuit against Google for censorship, well where do we sign? …
So here’s what Diamond and Silk had to say about this:
“@YouTube @TeamYouTube stopped over 95% percent of our videos from being monetized, stating: ‘It’s Not Suitable For All Advertisers,’” the two said in a series of tweets. “Wonder if @YouTube @TeamYouTube stopped the monetization of our videos because we are loyal supporters of the @POTUS. Hummmm. Sounds like Censorship to us, which is a Violation of our First Amendment. A Bias Method used to Silence our Conservative Voices. @YouTube, how was it OK to monetize our videos for the past two years and now those same videos are no longer eligible for monetization?”
Godspeed to Diamond and Silk, if they do pursue their promised class action lawsuit against these progressive, monopolistic companies.
Of course, it goes without saying that alt-left organizations (like BLM) are not classified as “hate groups” by the SPLC and social media companies or that alt-left videos are not widely demonetized.
The determination of what ought to be punished or censored seems too often political, because progressives believe that President Trump would not have won the 2016 election had progressives been able to better control Trump’s use of the Internet.
By using the Internet as his pulpit, Trump was able to sidestep the biased progressive media, preventing the alt-left from totally controlling the narrative. For that, he could not be forgiven.
Furthermore, the alt-left must somehow ensure that by the time elections roll around in 2018 and 2020, they can censor political speech on the Internet well enough to prevent more conservatives from winning.
Obama politicized the entire executive branch, but particularly useful was using the IRS to target political opponents, stifling their free speech and keeping them from fully participating in the 2012 election campaigns. With Obama out of office (and Clinton left out in the cold), the alt-left now must develop new tactics and find and utilize different “allies,” such as social media monopolies.
Diamond and Silk did much to help Trump to win the election, so it goes without saying that they would be targeted by the alt-left. In addition, it doesn’t fit the alt-left’s narrative if smart, black women stray from the liberal plantation to support President Trump. They must be punished for doing so. Their speech must be stifled, too.
The article linked above cites videos of other conservatives who have been unfairly and perhaps illegally censored by social media monopolies, which, by the way, owe their financial success to the Internet, which was created and funded by U.S. taxpayers. That fact makes the Internet, arguably, similar to broadcasting, which is regulated by the FCC.
Internet monopolies should be held to the same standards as public broadcasters. Partisan political censorship imposed by private companies that use a publicly-founded platform should be illegal, because such censorship is a threat to our democratic republic.
Currently, only the government is proscribed by the Constitution from censoring the Internet, but it seems at least plausible that those whose businesses and livelihoods are damaged by biased political censorship have a valid legal argument and a basis to sue for relief under business and contract law.
The alt-left are using every tool in their kit to both conspire with and coordinate with the mainstream media and progressive social media monopolies to undermine the will of the voters, who chose President Trump to “drain the swamp” that is Washington, DC.
The alt-left are also trying to change the very character of our culture and our country. This, they cannot be allowed to do.
Stay the course. Resist the resistance. Pray for our President, his family, and our country.