As the Tables Turn: Lynch Goes Under the Microscope

Several recent developments will be interesting to follow in the mainstream media. It’s their turn to squirm now. An article in the New York Post says that a special counsel may “probe Team Obama’s obstruction of justice.”

Whether or not an investigator is appointed, Congress itself intends to investigate former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and her potential obstruction of justice and politicization of the criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server.

Under sworn questioning, [former FBI Director James] Comey has veered off the topic of President Trump and Russia and revealed several damning incidents in which his predecessor’s administration politically interfered in the Hillary Clinton email investigation. And now the Senate will investigate Team Obama for obstruction of justice.

The findings of the powerful panel, which has oversight of the Justice Department and FBI, could lead to a separate criminal investigation and the naming of another special counsel …

Comey testified under oath that Lynch had ordered him to mislead the public by calling the investigation into Clinton a matter (conforming to Clinton’s campaign talking points) instead of a criminal investigation–a request to which he submitted.

Additionally, Lynch would not recuse herself formally from the investigation, after it became apparent to the entire world that she had compromised the integrity of the investigation by secretly meeting with the target’s husband, former president Bill Clinton, under very suspicious circumstances.

Even more damning, the article reminds us that the New York Times reported that

Lynch privately assured the Clinton campaign she would keep FBI agents in check and wouldn’t let their investigation “go too far,” according to a message the FBI intercepted involving then-Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

So Lynch apparently had reassured the Clintons that the fix was in and the matter was only for show, to give the public the illusion that the Obama administration was actually interested in following the law.

The New York Post article goes on to point out that it would be of great interest to know who else may have been party to these conversations, specifically those that Comey had with Lynch, and whether or not any documentation exists that can be subpoenaed. (We all know how avidly Comey memorialized conversations, especially those he thought may come in handy at some point in the future as a CYA.)

Originally the mainstream media reported that the FBI had the Wasserman Schultz email itself–a smoking gun that confirmed that the fix was in.

Later, that revelation morphed into a new meme that instead this email was referenced only in a false document planted by the Russians to disrupt the election. In other words, we’re to believe that the Russians faked this email and then wrote about it in a document obtained by the FBI, after the Russians planted it for them to find. Such a narrative would, of course, redound to the benefit of the Democrats. Let’s blame the Russians!

It’s been reported by Circa that Comey surprised Lynch with the email during a conversation with her:

Comey told lawmakers he confronted Lynch with a highly sensitive piece of evidence, a communication between two political figures that suggested Lynch had agreed to put the kibosh on any prosecution of Clinton.

Comey said “the attorney general looked at the document then looked up with a steely silence that lasted for some time, then asked him if he had any other business with her and if not that he should leave her office,” said one source who was briefed.

The New York Post article informs us that Comey’s notes can be subpoenaed along with

the Wasserman Schultz document, which, contrary to recent media reports, isn’t fake. (Comey testified such reports are “nonsense.”) So might the NSA recording of Lynch’s chat with Clinton, which took place on board a government plane [be subpoenaed].

Congressional sources say Lynch will almost certainly be called to answer Comey’s allegations under oath.

A citizen has tried to obtain the recording from within Lynch’s government plane, to no avail. Hopefully, Congress will have better luck.

The question of whether the smoking-gun email was invented by the Russians and then planted, or whether it’s real, is easily determined by subpoenaing the email accounts of the sender and receiver(s). Senator Lindsey Graham doubts that the email is fake or planted by Russians, pointing out that Comey told Congress about the email, but not that it was fake.

“He talked to members of the Senate and House intel committee that he was sitting on emails that the Russians had between the Democratic Party and the Department of Justice that were highly explosive,” Graham said. “He never once told a member of the House or the Senate that he thought the email was fake.

If the writers of these emails don’t cooperate and cough up their messages, then the information can likely be obtained from the internet service providers or the NSA.

In related news, former DHS director Jeh Johnson testified today that the DNC refused to allow the DHS or the FBI to access their equipment after it was allegedly hacked by Russians before the election.

“Sometime in 2016, I became aware of a hack into systems of the Democratic National Committee,” Johnson said. “… I pressed my staff to know whether DHS was sufficiently proactive, and on the scene helping the DNC identify the intruders and patch vulnerabilities. The answer, to the best of my recollection, was not reassuring: the FBI and the DNC had been in contact with each other months before about the intrusion, and the DNC did not feel it needed DHS’s assistance at that time.” 

The FBI reportedly faced a similar rejection. 

Emails from then-DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz ultimately were leaked ahead of the party’s national convention in Philadelphia. Those emails seemed to show party officials conspiring to sabotage Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign. The incident led to Schultz’s resignation. 

Oddly enough, there has been no claim that those particular emails of Wasserman Schultz’s were fake or planted by the Russians.

Because the DNC refused to allow the DHS or the FBI to examine their equipment, a fact also testified to by Comey, those departments could not credibly state that “the Russians” hacked the DNC, as has been widely reported:

The FBI instead relied on the assessment from a third-party security company called CrowdStrike [hired by the Democrats, who stood to benefit politically by such a false meme].

The DNC did not immediately respond to a request for comment by CNN.  [Then President-elect now President] Donald Trump … hit Democrats, tweeting,

“So how and why are they so sure about hacking if they never even requested an examination of the computer servers? What is going on?”

The dubious nature of the DNC contractor was reported in the UK media:

It was an explosive conclusion which cast a pall over the entire election: that the Kremlin was behind a hack of the Democratic National Committee which resulted in its embarrassing secrets being published.

First made in June 2016, it has overshadowed the election, transition and now presidency of Donald Trump. 

And the FBI, CIA, NSA and 12 other intelligence agencies published an unprecedented joint report saying [that] Vladimir Putin ordered a hacking campaign to tip the election against Hillary Clinton.

But now the first expert company to make a link between the DNC hacks and the Kremlin is facing a damaging series of questions over its credibility, can disclose.

Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike has had to retract portions of a report supporting its allegations of Russian cyberattacks – and is also refusing to address Congress about its findings on Moscow’s election hacking. …

CrowdStrike, based in Irvine, California, is also the only group that the DNC allowed to directly examine its servers. 

Not even the FBI has been granted access to the servers.

U.S. agencies have instead relied on CrowdStrike’s work. There is no other known forensic evidence which has been publicly disclosed to link the Kremlin to the attacks, including in a series of intelligence community statements and reports.

But now questions are emerging about the reliability of the company’s findings. 

Apparently questions were raised only in the UK. How much buzz is there in the U.S. media with regard to the potentially bogus provenance of the allegation that the Russians hacked the DNC?

In yet other news, the NSC has told Judicial Watch that documents they requested under the Freedom of Information Act have been inexplicably sent to the presidential library of Barack Obama. As reported at Breitbart:

The National Security Council cannot hand over records relating to former National Security Adviser Susan Rice’s surveillance of Americans, because they have been moved to the Obama presidential library and may be sealed for as may as five years, conservative watchdog Judicial Watch announced Monday.

The NSC informed Judicial Watch in a letter dated May 23 that materials related to Rice’s requests to know the identities of Americans swept up in surveillance of foreign targets, including any Trump campaign or transition officials, have been moved to the library.

Talk about potential obstruction of justice! As the writer points out:

Congress should act to stop this travesty of justice.  Obama shouldn’t own any of those files.  Those files are evidence as well as historic record, and in either case, they belong solely to the American people who paid for them.

Not only Congress but also President Trump should act ASAP. Those files should be immediately subpoenaed and returned to the control of the government. President Trump can get them and he can release them.

Congress can also issue subpoenas and it seems that they have done so already with regard to unmasking records, so it becomes important to learn at what point these documents were transferred to the Obama Library.

Potential obstruction of justice and obstruction of Congress?

Curiously, the library does not yet exist, so where exactly are these records today? Will they, like so many others, end up disappeared or Bleach-bitted?

Watch closely what happens next.


153 responses to “As the Tables Turn: Lynch Goes Under the Microscope

  1. NOW READ THIS!!! …. just 38 ?
    YIKES!!! ..WOW …AGAIN >> DROP-in’ like FLYS << … "DEAD DON'T TALK" ?

  2. ~ Woody • 24 minutes ago

    Coming in the future to a City near U when the Muslim population reaches
    a certain ….. percentage. % % % %

    As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority & not as a threat to anyone.
    In fact, they may be featured in articles & films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

    United States Muslim 1.0%

    Australia Muslim 1.5%

    Canada Muslim 1.9%

    China Muslim 1%-2%

    Italy Muslim 1.5%

    Norway Muslim 1.8%

    At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities & disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails & among street gangs:

    Denmark Muslim 2%

    Germany Muslim 3.7%

    United Kingdom Muslim 2.7%

    Spain Muslim 4%

    Thailand Muslim 4.6%

    From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

    They will Push for the introduction of Halal (clean by Islamic standards) Food, thereby Securing food Preparation jobs for Muslims. ….. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves along with Threats…. for Failure …… to Comply. (United States ). …YEP YEP YEP!!!

    France Muslim 8%

    Philippines Muslim 5%

    Sweden Muslim 5%

    Switzerland Muslim 4.3%

    The Netherlands Muslim 5.5%

    Trinidad &Tobago Muslim 5.8%

    At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is
    not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

    When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris car-burnings) .
    Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in Uprisings & Threats
    ….. ( Amsterdam Mohammed cartoons).

    Guyana Muslim 10%

    India Muslim 13.4%

    Israel Muslim 16%

    Kenya Muslim 10%

    Russia Muslim 10-15%

    After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings & church & synagogue burning:

    Ethiopia Muslim 32.8%

    At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks & ongoing militia warfare:

    Bosnia Muslim 40%

    Chad Muslim 53.1%

    Lebanon Muslim 59.7%

    From 60% you may expect unfettered
    persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing
    (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon & Jizya, the tax placed on

    Albania Muslim 70%

    Malaysia Muslim 60.4%

    Qatar Muslim 77.5%

    Sudan Muslim 70%

    After 80% expect State run ethnic
    cleansing and genocide:

    Bangladesh Muslim 83%

    Egypt Muslim 90%

    Gaza Muslim 98.7%

    Indonesia Muslim 86.1%

    Iran Muslim 98%

    Iraq Muslim 97%

    Jordan Muslim 92%

    Morocco Muslim 98.7%

    Pakistan Muslim 97%

    Palestine Muslim 99%

    Syria Muslim 90%

    Tajikistan Muslim 90%

    Turkey Muslim 99.8%

    United Arab Emirates Muslim 96%

    100% will usher in the Peace of Dar-es-Salaam the Islamic House of Peace theres supposed to be Peace because ………

    everybody ….. ????? …. is a Muslim: !!!!!!! ????

    Afghanistan Muslim 100%

    Saudi Arabia Muslim 100%

    Somalia Muslim 100%

    Yemen Muslim 99.9%

    Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

    It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around Ghettos based on their Ethnicity. Muslims do NOT integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more Power than their national average …. would Indicate.

    • Similarly, right now, today, in the USA, the Black Lives Matter movement is working on a project, a goal, of “black community control of the police.” Look it up and read it and weep. There’s going to be some kind of conference about JUST THAT THING in St. Louis soon. Yes. Black community control of the police. NOT everybody has a say in the control of the police. Not the mayor. Not the boards of aldermen or commissioners or whatever. The BLACK community. Not the white community. White people and others to have no say, I suppose. Why? Is their argument that they should control the police because disproportionately their people commit all the crimes? They want their own police. Their own separate places, I guess. You know, like the muslims have in some cities, despite what the cops say–the “no go zones” in Dearbornistan. Similar to in France and Britain where non-muslims aren’t welcome, don’t go, get attacked if they do go, and the cops “stand down.” Sound familiar? Coming soon to a country very near to you, UNLESS … MAGA!!!

  3. “Leo Hohmann’s brilliantly researched book is well worth your time to read, study, and pass on to like-minded Americans. It isn’t an accident that our communities are experiencing increased crime, acts of terrorism, and a drag on economic growth. It is by design. Hohmann unfolds the entire story for us, layer by tragic layer. I’ve seen the truth of the negative consequences of third-world resettlement in my home state, and I witnessed the shocking inattention to these consequences by many in positions of power in Washington. Read Hohmann’s book to learn how you can play an effective role in protecting your backyard.”

    —Former U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann …..^^^^^

    “The poison fruit of the Left’s treasonous migrant policy has not yet fully become obvious, but it soon will. They are importing huge numbers of people who do not share American values and have no interest in adopting them. When we see an epidemic of jihad terror attacks, FGM, honor killing, and demands for Sharia accommodation in this country, you will know why if you read Leo Hohmann’s essential book., Stealth Invasion tells the truth that the mainstream media is determined to cover up: that the Muslim migrants are not “refugees,” but hostile invaders.”

    —Pamela Geller, President, American Freedom Defense Initiative,
    author, Stop the Islamization of America

    • So true. They want to do to us what they are doing to all European countries. Someone on FOX News recently noted that Brussels is 25% muslim. Think of that. 1/4 of the people in Brussels are muslim. What does this do to those unique and special cultures that have been around for centuries? Are THEIR cultures not worth cherishing and saving? The muslims do not and will not assimilate. WHY are they stupidly doing this to themselves? Do you see China importing massive numbers of people who refuse to fit into their culture? Japan? Russia, even? NOPE. There’s nothing wrong, nothing racist or bigoted, in trying to PRESERVE YOUR UNIQUE WAY OF LIFE. “Anthropologists” like Stanley Ann Dunham would agree, wouldn’t they? Sociologists and anthropologists, a majority of them leftists, constantly praise diversity and multiculturalism and preservation of unique life ways. Why is it only valuable for “persons of color” or backward cultures?

    • I wish he would have quoted the passage in the koran he’s referring to. I read it and recall NOTHING LIKE HIS INTERPRETATION whatsoever. What a crock. It reminds me of that old narrative about how the “native Americans” are one with nature but the evil white people aren’t. Every stone, every mountain, every desert is supposed to be “sacred land,” as if the Irish, the English, the Scots, the French, the Italians, the Russians–as if none of THEM revere their special places or their homelands. Hell, even Hitler did. Just another way to appease the minority. This makes me sick. Virtue signaling? Or is he simply deluded or possessed? Cultural death wish.

  4. ^^^^ …. + read the comments also… son of a … ? …. WE NEED ACTION!

  5. The LEFT today actually does tacitly Promote Violence & Celebrates it when it occurs to effect their ends. They Pretend to reject it but they don’t. They like it when it happens; they think it advances their agenda. Sometimes they hire and pay for it in order to blame the other side. They are cagey & experienced in those Alinskyite Tactics. But they know only how to appeal to their Lowest common denominator, those already Mind-Numbed by the parochialism of the Left, as if this strategy were going to win over new recruits to their cause. They are a Bit like ISIS in this regard. They are so Racist, so Contemptuous of their “marks,” that they think they can Seduce every Hispanic, African-American, gay, illegal immigrant, refugee migrant, etc. to their Voter rolls by slimming Trump & conservatives. It Never Occurs to them that Many of those people actually Embrace the Traditional Values they SO Loathe & are determined to nullify. …. O’BAMA … MOOCHIE …PELOSI …WATERS …. etc….

    • They have normalized it, especially for the persons of color and the youth of today. They call it “self defense” and dehumanize the “other,” so that it’s “okay” to do violence against them. What Hitler did.

    • Did you see the reference to Jill Stein? Remember her? Did you know that SHE was at that same dinner with Putin, at the same table, as Flynn? Did you hear anybody talk about HER colluding with Russians?

  6. Well,
    That’s a deep subject,
    No, seriously!
    After a hundred X22 reports and a hundred more conspiracy theory reports, we have this in the mainstream so called press:
    to wit:
    A new financial crisis is brewing in the emerging economies and it could hit “with a vengeance”, an influential group of central bankers has warned.

    Emerging markets such as China are showing the same signs that their economies are overheating as the US and the UK demonstrated before the financial crisis of 2007-08, according to the annual report of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

    Claudio Borio, the head of the BIS monetary and economic department, said a new recession could come “with a vengeance” and “the end may come to resemble more closely a financial boom gone wrong”

    The BIS, which is sometimes known as the central bank for central banks and counts Bank of England Governor Mark Carney among its members, warned of trouble ahead for the world economy.

    It predicted that central banks would be forced to raise interest rates after years of record lows in order to combat inflation which will “smother” growth.

    The group also warned about the threat poised by rising debt in countries like China and the rise in protectionism such as in the US under Donald Trump, City AM reported.

    snippy snippy snip

    Bank of International Settlements, ummm. that’s the Rothschild family holding group, that appears to hold every makor central bank in the world and which any conspiracy theorist worth his salts will tell you is at the root of all evil.
    Is it?
    How could I know?
    There’s this:
    Rothschild is synonymous with money, and they are the most powerful and wealthy family in the world. They have big investments in real estates, industries, oil, etc. They also had close relationships with royal families where they went to establish their banking empire and examples are Carl Rothschild was very close to the Italian Nobel de’ Medici and Evelyn de Rothschild is the personal financial advisor of the English Queen.

    This family has said to be worth more than 500 trillion dollars but still, they do not appear in the rich list as the flimsy reason given is that the wealth is now distributed within their large family.
    snip from
    So what’s the point?
    (Our national debt is about 20 trillion dollars – the Rothschild family owns 500 trillion dollars, grasp the comparison)
    Obviously they are not too pleased with President Trump.
    If they are saying a drastic recession is coming then it is they that
    have the power to make it happen so this particlar warning is worth
    more than your average old warning about Planet X or something.
    What to do?
    Keep most of your savings as cash under the bed and
    support President Trump without distraction.
    These people can be stood down, but Trump is the only guy still standing who can do it.
    Everyone else in politics has been bought, sold their soul, or whatever else you want to call it. Sold their freedom for, as Janis Joplin called it, “Cheap Thrills”.

    BE SANE …USE YOUR HEADS FOLKS while WTP …still have 1 !

    • Hell yes, he’s right. Isn’t he always right? HA! 🙂

      • From that story:

        “There were two other responses of which we are aware, thanks to the Post: The first was an operation involving “implanting computer code in sensitive computer systems that Russia was bound to find, [which] served only as a reminder to Moscow of the United States’ cyber reach.” The second was authorizing a covert cyberwar program which “involves deploying ‘implants’ in Russian networks deemed ‘important to the adversary and that would cause them pain and discomfort if they were disrupted,’ a former U.S. official said.” These would be cyberbombs which could be triggered in retaliation to future Russian operations. …”

        Remember when Scooter Libby went to prison because his memory of a conversation differed from that of a reporter and the entire point of the “investigation” in which he was questioned was because he was falsely accused by Comey (who knew it really was Armitage) of “leaking” the identity of Valerie Plame to the media after they FALSELY claimed she was a COVERT operative for the CIA when she wasn’t?

        So, how COVERT is this cyberwar program NOW that SOMEBODY LEAKED IT TO THE WAPO WHO PROCEEDED TO TELL THE WORLD? And these people are the same types, if not the same ones, who screamed that Trump “leaked” secret information to the Russians when he advised them about the possibility that terrorists could smuggle bombs onto planes disguised as laptop batteries! Something that THEY THEMSELVES, in the media, had already reported multiple times so it was already well known to anybody who reads. So HOW CONCERNED are they that this cyberwar operation, no longer covert, has been leaked and revealed to the Russians? Whose side are THEY on, IF this so-called cyberwar thing really does exist and isn’t another FALSE NARRATIVE fed to the complicit media to cover for Barry’s ineptitude?

  8. President Donald Trump has acknowledged … that Russia assaulted
    the U.S. political system & it’s made him absolutely Furious …
    at former USURPER / “p-dent” … Barack Obama. …^^^^^^

    That’s the take-away from Trump’s Monday morning Twitter.

    The reason that President Obama did NOTHING about Russia after being notified by the CIA of meddling is that HE expected Clinton would WIN …..
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2017

    …& did not want to “Rock the Boat.” He didn’t “Choke,” he Colluded
    or Obstructed, & it did the Dems & Crooked Hillary no good.
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 26, 2017

    • They crack me up. Really. For people whose job it is to deal with WORDS, they sure seem to have trouble understanding the English language. Did Trump, in any of those tweets, acknowledge that Russia “assaulted the U.S. political system?” NO. He’s citing THEIR REPORTING that claims the Russians did it. These people don’t have the brains to keep up with all the nuances of what Trump is saying. If he needs to change his tweeting, he needs to dumb it down for the media, spell it out like you have to for CHILDREN. Either they’re stupid or they PRETEND to be so they can distort what he says.

      We already know that Trump considers their reporting to be FAKE NEWS. imho, the FACT that Barry did so little between August and when he finally initiated those “sanctions,” lends credence to the belief that there WAS NO HACKING, no interference (in the way they want us to believe), in our election by “the Russians.” It’s a fake meme created to damage Trump. That’s why Barry didn’t actually cause an international incident over it. The sanctions they did impose were things they were looking for an excuse to do for a long time–for example, closing the Russian compounds. The FBI, it’s said, complained about the time, money, and resources they required to surveil them, so they wanted them out of the places.

      Even the reasons Barry’s peeps give for Barry NOT acting are POLITICAL, so in essence they’re digging the hole deeper for Barry. They’re saying that the integrity of the election was LESS IMPORTANT TO HIM THAN POLITICAL REASONS. As president, he shouldn’t have considered POLITICS whatsoever.

      And these are the people who accuse Trump of collusion and mendacity. It’s obvious that for Barry, EVERY SITUATION was political. They also say that the hounding of Flynn was done for political reasons–because he opposed the Iran deal and, when he worked for Trump, he would have exposed OTHER parts of the deal that were kept from the American people. What they should be looking into is WHOSE SIDE WAS BARRY ON?

  9. Journalist Jamie Bartlett joined George Knapp to discuss …. ??????
    the strange worlds of the innovators, Disrupters, idealists, & extremists
    who think the human race can do Better, & Believe They know how. Bartlett believes that the world is changing faster than we can keep up, & that within a few years, we will be living in a society that is unrecognizable from today, & thinks we are “entering a time of real turbulence & change.” Some of the radical movements & groups he Has studied are attempting to get the world prepared & used to the coming radical changes before its too late, & before the very rich have exclusive access to technologies such as life extension drugs & treatments.
    Bartlett has noticed that one of the fastest growing movements in the last few years has been people who are becoming Involved with Psychedelic Drugs, …?? in part as a response to a Decline …. in organized Religion. Comparing it to the 1960s, Bartlett says “It is as big as it was then,” …. O’ …. Radicals Chasing Utopia ?

    • I read a scary story in the WSJ about how China uses facial recognition software to locate and publicly shame and punish … wait for it … jaywalkers! Seriously, it’s a very scary thought. They also use it, by forced installation of cameras within, at mosques, churches, and synagogues to record the faces of everyone present. People (even in China) complain that it’s a form of intimidation to PREVENT certain people from participating in religion, especially commie party members and government workers. Since they KNOW they’ll be recorded and identified at worship, they, of course, will just not go. It’s intimidation. Creation of a huge database for future use. Orwellian.

      Isn’t this something you can envision the DemoncRATS being perfectly on board with? Imagine if they could identify everybody at a Trump rally and then post their photos all over social media in order to SHAME THEM and scare them into nevermore supporting their favored candidate? All they have to do is get their wonderful SPLC to label some entity as a “hate group” and then identify and label its supporters as haters, holding them up to public shaming if not worse (like violence). Hitlerian!

      I also read an editorial in the paper today about a man whose small business was targeted for union organizing. When he told the union he wasn’t interested, they targeted his operation. They followed his trucks around. They set up a huge bloody inflatable rat on the sites where his workers were trying to do their jobs. They even followed the man’s wife and family, even though they had nothing to do with his business. When he figured out a way to keep them from learning where his workers would be, then they simply spent millions of dollars (seriously) surveilling all highway ramps, looking for trucks with that business’s name on them. Then they followed them to set up their rat at the job site, thus harassing not only the business owner but anybody who hired his company, probably with the goal of shaming others into NOT hiring his company and damaging the man’s business as well as all the workers the union claims to care about. The owner said that he’d never been approached by workers saying they wanted to organize and that it would take only 15 workers to say so, to initiate a vote on the issue. But the workers didn’t want to join the union. Nevertheless, the union wouldn’t take no for an answer and their own answer was this severe harassment of the man, his family, and his workers.

      Imagine if unions, that nearly uniformly use their extorted “dues” to support the DemoncRATS, could have a facial identification system like in China.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s