Dreams of His Destiny

Another biography of Barack Obama is soon to be published. Many and various are the articles exposing some of the “bombshells” in the apparently semi-authorized book. (Obama sat for long but off-the-record interviews with the author.) If we look at some of what’s been revealed so far, it’s hard not to notice the hypocrisy of those who today excoriate President Donald Trump for being who he is while lionizing Barack Obama, despite who he is.

Consider the typical Obama-supporting liberal: someone who is most definitely pro-diversity, anti-bigotry, anti-racism, pro-LGBTQ+, and pro-feminism. Look at these new revelations through that liberal lens:

Obama coldly decided–after reveling in a multi-cultural, multi-racial, multi-national identity for most of his life–to embrace solely an African-American identity once he had decided to run for political office in Chicago. [The “resolution of his black identity was directly linked to his decision to pursue a political career.”]

Obama dropped his live-in girlfriend in the mid-1980s because he had decided upon a political career and because he determined that it would never fly among his African-American constituency for him to have a white-skinned wife. [“The lines are very clearly drawn. . . . If I am going out with a white woman, I have no standing here.”] Therefore, he left the “white woman” whom he loved–the woman to whom he had already twice proposed marriage–because her race stood between him and his destiny. (The woman is of Dutch and Japanese ancestry.)

Obama referred to his Occidental college friends and roommates collectively as “the Pakis” because they were from Pakistan. (Oddly, these friends all seem to have moved to New York at the same time as Obama.)

Obama considered gayness” when calculating how he would express himself sexually. Ultimately, he somehow decided that being gay was less demanding than having heterosexual relationships. (Surely political calculation had nothing to do with his choice of pursuing the more-demanding heterosexuality.)

Before Obama decided that interracial dating would be frowned upon in his newly chosen African-American community in Chicago, he had up until then dated two wealthy white women; lived with another white woman whom he dumped but then continued to see on the side while dating the black woman whom he ultimately wed; and also apparently cheated upon both of those girlfriends with an allegedly divorced mother of three of Hispanic descent. While dating one white woman, he pointedly would not introduce her to his community-organizing associates because of her race.

Many years after his relationship with a wealthy white woman Obama had dated at Occidental, he bragged about his sexual conquest of the blond bombshell. [“The only woman he ever talked about screwing was some really hot blond chick that he was still proud of” … “He was really proud that he’d banged some super-hot blonde from a super-rich family.”]

So what can we deduce from these alternate facts about Obama?

Obama soundly rejected his white heritage. He was ashamed of being seen with white women, although he preferred to date them. He decided that he could not marry anyone but a black woman to achieve his “destiny.”  He broke up with the “woman he loved” because she was not black. (Bigotry? Racism? Anti-diversity? Anti-multiculturalism? Divisive? Imagine if it were revealed that President Trump had refused to date non-white women or had actually dumped a woman he loved because she was black and wouldn’t be accepted in his circles.)

Obama used a racial slur against his own Pakistani friends. (Racism? Bigotry? Imagine if it were revealed that President Trump had ever used the epithet “Pakis.”)

Obama “considered gayness,” as if being gay is a lifestyle choice. (Isn’t it a tenet of liberalism that being gay is not a choice but denotes a special class of being that therefore deserves special protection because it’s inborn? Imagine if it were revealed that President Trump suggested that being gay is a choice. Only yesterday one of President Trump’s nominees withdrew his name from consideration simply because he once stated the obvious–that in medical circles gender dysphoria (transgenderism) is categorized as a mental disorder.)

Obama boasted about his sexual conquest of a rich, blond woman. His friends used crude words to describe this relationship–he was banging or screwing this really hot, rich chick. Obama was proud that he had scored where others couldn’t. (Objectification of women? Engaging in locker-room banter, at “regular poker games,” no less! Anti-feminist? Sexist? We already know the reaction of the liberal world to the revelation that President Trump once said that because of his wealth, women literally throw themselves at him. He described in crude terms what they would allow him to do, if he so desired (“grab them” by the genitals). Now we have multiple friends of Obama’s saying that he bragged often about having “banged” a rich white woman. Is this any less crude or distasteful or degrading to women than what Trump said? Is it any less sexist? Add to that the element of racism, which isn’t there in the allegations against Trump, and Obama’s braggadocio is arguably worse.)

Finally, we learn that while dating his future wife, Obama cheated on her with his former live-in girlfriend, whom he dumped for being white, and then he cheated on both of those women with a fellow community activist!  (We have already heard and read many times what a womanizer and a cheat President Trump has allegedly been. When the shoe is on the other foot, can we expect similar moralizing about Obama’s cheating ways?)

Hypocrisy, pure and simple! Will Obama remain the darling of the left if the revelations made in this new book are fully reported?

There was another revelation made, something that’s probably of very little import to liberals: Obama used cocaine well into his twenties, something which he previously claimed to have left behind in his teens. He also smoked pot in his twenties, maybe beyond.

The thing is, Obama has said many things that have turned out to be flat-out untrue. What else has he lied about for political reasons, after coldly calculating what would best help him achieve his “destiny?”  He chose his black identity. He rejected his white girlfriends and chose a black wife (black skin–the #1 qualification), and he also chose heterosexuality, rejecting gayness (at least on the surface). He adamantly denied ever having been Muslim, despite the evidence of his school records in Indonesia. (He also disavowed his former name–Barry Soetoro.)

All of these choices he made for political reasons. Could Obama have fulfilled his “destiny” had he told the truth about his origins? Is it any wonder that his autobiography is full of false narratives and that he still won’t disclose his original, 3-dimensional, authenticated paper birth certificate?

Will we ever know the truth and nothing but the truth about Barack Hussein Obama?


134 responses to “Dreams of His Destiny

    • I like to think that Trump was pulling their legs with a joke they didn’t get and still don’t get. They’re the ones comparing him to Nixon. He knows they’re salivating and so he’s throwing them some fake red meat (or would that be alternative red meat)?

      • yep …a FOOL & HIS $$$ MONEY’s?… COMEY …WTP …. did NOT
        enjoy nor RESPECTED the way you JERKED …WTP around protecting
        YOUR AZZ … in our FACES…. either … DO YOUR JOB? your NOT

        Former FBI Director James Comey was furious at the lack of respect the White House showed him in the way he was fired, sources have told ABC News.
        Associates say he is simmering at some of the comments directed at him by White House staffers, who have used words like “atrocities” to describe his actions as director.
        One person close to the former director said that President Trump calling Comey a “showboat” and suggesting he is not “competent” has required Comey to show considerable restraint.
        “Look, he’s a showboat. He’s a grandstander,” Trump said about Comey in an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt on Thursday. “The FBI has been in turmoil. You know that. I know that. Everybody knows that.”

  1. Well, this is interesting. How long will McCabe last? http://truepundit.com/fbi-deputy-director-snaps-in-anti-trump-tirade-mccabe-professes-hatred-for-u-s-president-to-fbi-colleagues/ (It’s an older story.) Re: http://www.thepostemail.com/2017/05/10/is-this-why-comey-was-fired/

    “Mere days before Gen. Michael Flynn was sacked as national security advisor, FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe gathered more than a dozen of his top FBI disciples to plot how to ruin Flynn’s aspiring political career and manufacture evidence to derail President Donald Trump, according to FBI sources.

    McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official, emphatically declared at the invite-only gathering with raised voice: “**** Flynn and then we **** Trump,” according to direct sources. Many of his top lieutenants applauded and cheered such rhetoric. A scattered few did not.

    This was one of several such meetings held in seclusion among key FBI leaders since Trump was elected president, FBI sources confirm. At the congregation where McCabe went off the political rails and vowed to destroy Flynn and Trump, there were as many as 16 top FBI officials, inside intelligence sources said. No lower-level agents or support personnel were present. …”

    This also I do believe. It rings true. We shall see if anyone comes forward, although what media would report it if they did?

  2. God …. THINGS …. CAN …. ALWAYS BE …. “MUCH” WORSE!!!


  3. oops, typo in my ID
    ave m | May 13, 2017 at 3:29 pm | Reply
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    Check this out:
    Well…well…well…The leaks about Comey are starting to come already. One of them claims that the Comey FBI offered a Russian hacker named Yevgeny Nikulin a deal. Yevgeny Nikulin is wanted by the FBI for allegedly hacking into US companies and other cyber attacks. Comey’s FBI agents promised Mr. Nikulin money, American citizenship and a free apartment for taking the fall over hacking of the Clinton campaign. If this report had been false, you would think the FBI would come out with full denial that this deal was ever made. Instead, the FBI declined to comment.
    FBI offered deal to Russian hacker to claim he hacked Hillary’s e-mails on behalf of Trump
    FBI offered deal to Russian hacker to claim he hacked Hillary’s e-mails on behalf of Trump

    FBI agents promised Mr. Nikulin money, American citizenship and a free apartment for taking the fall over hacking Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, he alleged in a letter published Thursday by Nastoyashchoe Vremya, a Russian-language website.

    “[They told me:] you will have to confess to breaking into Clinton’s inbox for [President Trump] on behalf of [Russian President Vladimir Putin],” Mr. Nikulin wrote, as translated by The Moscow Times.
    “He was offered to falsely testify that he was cooperating in the attack on the Democratic Party,” defense attorney Martin Sadilek said Thursday, the Associated Press reported.

    The FBI declined to comment.
    I bet Snopes went crazy.
    No more need for pressers, not this year.
    Drain the swamp President Trump, and please stay out of public view.

    • I’ll bet that is 100% true. I remember reading about this guy when he was first apprehended. There’s no way they can prove the Russians or anybody else “hacked” the DNC or Podesta because (1) the DNC wouldn’t let them see the computer servers, (2) we know Podesta clicked on a link that downloaded the virus or let the “hacker” in, so it wasn’t Russians, (3) Wikileaks says, and there’s no reason to disbelieve them, that they got the info on the DNC from a DNC insider who copied it and gave it to them, and (4) the U.S. intel community, it’s been shown, has the ability to lay tracks to blame someone else (Russians, Ukrainians, Czech kids) for hacking that THEY do. So no matter what “evidence” the FBI comes up with, nobody’s going to believe it. Maybe that’s why they’re trying to bribe someone to CONFESS because then they don’t need to back it up with any actual evidence.

      We’re currently in the midst of the biggest hack in world history, brought about compliments of the Obama intel community. Wikileaks published the backdoor methods into these machines and now this very expensive hack can be laid right at the feet of our government because they wrote the code that allows the exploitation of the loopholes in Windows.

  4. get a clue … we all get treated EQUAL … & U have the $ boo-hoo
    http://www.celebitchy.com/535268/chanel_is_sorry_that_gabourey_sidibe_felt_unwelcome_and_offended_at_their_store/ …click on the GREEN …read MO’ ..

  5. There’s a sensational headline on Drudge this morning:

    Family’s private investigator: There is evidence Seth Rich had contact with WikiLeaks prior to death
    By: Marina Marraco
    Posted:May 15 2017 10:41PM EDT

    I am unable to copy text from this website.
    The gist of the story is that a DNC staffer, who was found shot to death, had been communicating with Wikileaks before his death.

    I remember Assange talking about trying to get someone out before they started posting their secrets before the election. Assange then said he failed to get him out in time,

    They might be talking about the same person.
    More information is available at the link, which I bet doesn’t stay up for very long.

  6. I am very bored with the Trump stories and I am no longer bothering to listen to them.
    I am also very unimpressed with Ann so called Coulter who now is getting some good publicity by saying maybe the Trunmp Haters were right.

    What’s the matter with Ann?
    She is upset that Trump hasn’t started building the wall.
    I would think, Ms Coulter, you would understand that the Constitution authors intentionally made it hard for government to do anything.
    The democrats would not vote through a stopgap funding bill which had any funds for the walland the WH decided not to shut down the government at such an early date, which I think was a good decision.

    Ann Coulter! Go give a speech in Berkeley or something,
    if you have the courage to do it, and I bet you don’t.

    I am pretty sure that Only Donald Trump had enough media savvy to beat Hillary Clinton. I would have preferred Mike Huckabee, but he would have lost to Hillary. If all the GOP wibble wobblers want someone different in 2020, they need to realize that if they abandon ship now, then the whole ship, the whole maybe one last opportunity to save the country from a globalost orchestrated destruction, is lost too.

  7. You know, it sems to me, that if I imagine any other Republican as President,
    would the hostile press be less hostile? Would they start to at least use truth in their coverage?
    I think tha snwer is a big fat NO.
    So if the entire mainstream press corp will not allow the presence of anyone other than a democrat in the Wh then what to do?
    We either say OK, only democrats from now on, or else we have to treat the press as the ENEMY of democracy, which is a very far shift from where we used to think they were.
    If the press are now an enemy of our country, then what do we do with an enemy?
    I think they have to removerd from power, not destroyed in the physical sense using violence, but in the economic sense, so that there is no longer any point in someone wanting to get or supply a job in news.
    I think the idea of eliminating the press conference as daily feature is a good one.
    Uf you look at other western countries, Great Britain, France, Canada you will notice that they rarely give press conferences.It is time to stop giving these hacks something to feed upon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s