Susan Rice wasn’t politicizing the intelligence apparatus. Moreover, she says that she
leaked nothing to nobody.
Double negative = positive.
Susan Rice, who told us that an Islam-insulting You Tube video caused the attack in Benghazi and the deaths of four brave Americans, now tells us that what she did, when unmasking Americans’ names, was done only to do her job to
protect the American people and the security of our country.
Sure. Who believes that one?
Pass the buck to the intelligence community, too, while you’re at it.
They chose what to summarize and put into those reports. They decided whether it was okay to unmask the innocent U.S. citizens, because sometimes Sue needed to know the names, but only in order to “understand” the conversation and to protect the American people. Yadda, yadda, yadda.
Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Conveniently, Rice can’t talk about the unmasked reports specifically, even in her own defense, because that would be to “expose classified information.”
Let’s cry BS on her spinning.
A Watergate-style scandal, for the “scandal-free” Obama administration. Rice’s
interest was not in national security but to advance the political interests of the Democratic party. The thing to bear in mind is that the White House does not do investigations. Not criminal investigations, not intelligence investigations.
So, let her under-oath testimony begin. Pop some corn and enjoy the show.