Pelosi Calls Illegal Aliens “Our People” and “Citizens”

nancy_pelosi-copy

Recently, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was challenged by a mother whose son was brutally murdered by an illegal alien.

The mother asked Pelosi:

If you need to go home tonight and line up your babies, as you say, and your grandbabies, which one of them could you look in their eyes today and tell them that they are expendable for another foreign person to have a nicer life? …

Which one would you like to say, ‘You, my child, are expendable for someone else to come over here and not follow the law and have a nicer life?

Our most-sincere sympathies and mega-kudos to Laura Wilkerson for speaking in a way that should have hit Pelosi where she lives, but to little avail. While Pelosi expressed condolences to this mother for her loss, Pelosi went on to outrageously state:

I do want to say to you that in our sanctuary cities, our people are not disobeying the law. These are law-abiding citizens

That, folks, is the problem in a nutshell. Democrats who favor “sanctuary cities” have adopted the specious claim and the attitude, shared by illegal alien activists across this land, that says that illegal aliens are not lawbreakers and are, more outrageously, citizens of the USA.

Illegal aliens are most assuredly not “our people” nor are they “law-abiding” nor are they “citizens.”

The word citizen is defined as follows:

a native or naturalized member of a state or nation who owes allegiance to its government and is entitled to its protection (distinguished from alien).

Anyone with a shred of common sense and intellectual honesty must admit that someone who enters another country illegally or stays within another country illegally (after a visa has expired) is not only breaking the law but is also not a member of the “people” of that country, much less a citizen of that country.

Illegal aliens, by definition, are not natives of this country, nor are they naturalized, nor do they owe our government allegiance (most of them vehemently reject it), nor are they entitled to its protection.

Pelosi had the gall and the abject cruelty to tell a grieving mother that her son was murdered by one of “our people” who is a “law-abiding citizen” of our country. Neither claim is true, so Pelosi lied to a grief-stricken mother to whom Pelosi owes sympathy, allegiance, and representation.

Whom do Pelosi and her fellow Democrats represent?

To whom do they owe allegiance?

Certainly not to illegal aliens and certainly not to those who break other laws besides our immigration laws. Yet Pelosi and like-minded Democrats seem to place the welfare of illegal aliens, who are not their consituents, above the welfare of their true constituents.

Sanctuary cities refuse to obey federal law in one area: They refuse to notify the federal government when they arrest and jail an illegal alien who has committed another offense–not simply breaking immigration law.

These are criminals who have been arrested and jailed for other crimes. All the officials need do to comply with federal law is to notify the federal government when a jailed person is illegally in our country. This simple thing they refuse to do, for no logical reason, except that perhaps Democrats do (pretend to) consider criminal illegal aliens to be citizens so that they can allow them to act as citizens by voting illegally for Democrats, who in turn protect them from the federal government.

What other reason could Democrats possibly have for putting the welfare of illegal aliens ahead of U.S. citizens who are too often the victims of illegal aliens and who are doubly victimized when they must pay their hard-earned tax dollars to the government, which allows their money to be redistributed (unfairly and probably illegally) to illegal aliens?

Pelosi claims that law enforcement doesn’t want to scare illegal aliens so that they fear to report crimes in their communities, lest they be deported. This claim is mere rationalization. In the first place, illegals do not rat on each other. More pertinent, there’s a provision of law that looks the other way on illegal aliens who report crimes. In other words, they don’t get deported or otherwise punished for reporting crimes.

President Trump is right to do everything he can to make sanctuary cities follow the law, and he’s more than right to call for a thorough investigation into the issue of illegal aliens voting in our elections. Stop them from voting and voila! The Democrats will no longer consider them to be their constituents.

Illegal aliens are not our people. That’s an oxymoron, Ms. Pelosi.

Illegal aliens are not our citizens. Another oxymoron, Ms. Pelosi.

The Democrats like to say that President Trump is not entitled to his own facts. Well, Democrats are not entitled to their lies and they’re not allowed to redefine words to suit their political desires. Especially, they’re not entitled to unilaterally change or ignore the laws or the Constitution of this Republic.

It’s long past time for the Democrats to get with the program, to straighten up and fly right.

President Trump, please make America safe again!

#####

140 responses to “Pelosi Calls Illegal Aliens “Our People” and “Citizens”

  1. https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2017/02/03/school-teacher-compares-build-the-wall-shirt-to-a-swastika/

    “A Kennewick middle school teacher landed in hot water when she pulled aside a student wearing a “Build the Wall” shirt. The language arts teacher at Chinook Middle School compared the shirt’s message with wearing a swastika.

    Now, the young teen’s mother is hoping her son’s experience shines a light on political bullying. …”

    Free speech for me but not for thee, if thy are not progressive like me.
    The left’s motto.

  2. https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2017/02/03/undocumented-student-sues-wells-fargo-for-denying-her-student-loan/

    “A federal lawsuit on Monday accused banking giant Wells Fargo of illegally denying student loans to young [illegal] immigrants who are protected from deportation and allowed to work and study in the U.S. under a program created by former President Barack Obama. …

    The young immigrants in the country illegally have Social Security numbers and documents that meet bank requirements for identification, but Wells Fargo refuses to give them loans based on their citizenship status, according to the lawsuit from the Los Angeles-based Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

    The loans, meanwhile, are available to U.S. citizens and permanent residents, the suit says.

    It seeks a court order declaring the policy discriminatory and forcing Wells Fargo to grant the loans to those participating in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. It also seeks unspecified monetary damages. …”

  3. All these Years and we still Can’t get it Right.​
    Some things should never change.

    ~ ~ ~ Theodore Roosevelt on Immigration ~ ~ ~
    1907 PHOTO This one needs to circulate
    I think this is one email that needs to be forwarded until every
    American with a computer receives it.
    The year is 1907, one hundred and 7+ years ago.

    READ PRINT UNDER PICTURE!
    cid:A9FD7B5D75D54B838C8B3A419839F7D3@MerlinPC

    Theodore Roosevelt’s ideas on Immigrants & being an AMERICAN in 1907.

    ‘In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American & assimilates himself to us, he shall
    be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet
    an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, & that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty & that is a loyalty to the American people.’
    ~~~ Theodore Roosevelt 1907 ~~~
    Every American citizen needs to read this!

  4. HERE ..JUST OVER …”1 W E E K” ??? WHAT’s the PROBLEM folks ???

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4187460/Lovre-evacuated-Paris.html

    • Let’s hope that one of the 100,000 the judge just let into our country doesn’t “behave” like this guy. Paris and the French are toast. French toast. They asked for it and they got it, unfortunately. They can’t put the genie back in the bottle. Jinn is out! Jokes on them. And here we have the left who seem to be chanting, “What do we want? Terrorists. When do we want them? Now.” Trump alone stands between us and going the way of Europe. The UK MAY survive, thanks to May, if she Brexits, as she’s supposed to. IF they listen to the People of the UK, but will they? They’re trying so hard to NOT listen to US, We the People of the USA. We HAVE SPOKEN but Soros, his minions, and the DemoncRATS STILL don’t listen.

  5. threats/ check hollywoods sick-os .. PROTECT freaks & out-casts?
    http://mashable.com/2017/02/02/threatening-posts-secret-service/

    • I’m a little confused about the writer’s attitude. He seems upset that Tomi believes that there’s racism against whites, but then he leads off by describing her whiteness, reducing her to her hair color, skin color, and background (affluent), reducing her to a STEREOTYPE. And what’s up with the microaggressive allusion to the stereotype of the dumb blonde? I DID perceive it. Did you? “Vacant stare?” This writer is a racist.

      Can you believe it that the left are attacking Trump for the mission that cost us a Navy Seal’s life in which some civilians MAY HAVE BEEN killed? We KNOW for sure that Obama’s drone missions killed MANY civilians. Where was their concern then? Besides which, this was an OBAMA mission, having been planned and ready for execution as soon as the position of the Moon was right (the first dark night). For them to say otherwise, that Trump planned it with his son-in-law and Bannon over dinner, is A TOTAL LIE AND FAKE NEWS. It’s not true. The mission was planned and set into motion by Obama, waiting ONLY for the weather conditions to be right. As the new Commander in Chief, of course, Trump had to give the final go-ahead, but he did NOT plan it himself and, as all presidents, relied on the expertise of the military. In no way is or was it like Benghazi. But there is this:

      One might also ask: how is it that it seemed that the terrorists had advance knowledge of the incoming raid? Hmmm?

      How many troops died on Obama’s watch? Did Bill Maher care about ANY OF THEM?

  6. ….. P O W E R ……!!!!!

  7. IMMIGRATION ORDERS UNRAVEL:
    TRUMP SLAMS DECISION…
    VOWS FIGHT…
    JUDGE USED BROAD POWER…
    COURT SHOWDOWN…
    AIRLINES RESUME FLIGHTS…
    ‘HOMELAND’ NOT FLAGGING…
    STATE DEPT REVERSES VISA BAN…

    BUSH JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP TRAVEL BAN
    MIDDLE EAST CITIZENS RUSH IN

    • It sounds exactly right. How ironic can these people get? Obama thumbed his nose at the law and the Constitution and wrote an executive order telling the government to NOT enforce the law. Did the ACLU sue him? NO! Did anyone hold massive demonstrations against him? NO! Did these lefties sue him? NO! Suddenly they claim to care about the law and the Constitution.

      But TRUMP writes an executive order ordering the government to FOLLOW THE LAW, and all hell breaks loose. You can’t make this stuff up. We truly are through the looking glass, where right is wrong and law is anarchy. God help us. We pray. Here’s more: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trumps-most-forceful-executive-order-141100341.html

      It includes anyone who lied or misrepresented on any documents or applications given to the government. IOW, voter registrations? Food stamp applications? I love it! The vote fraud will clean itself up, without the need for an investigation! Run for the border!

      “Sec. 5 Enforcement Priorities. In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress … as well as removable aliens who:

      “(a) Have been convicted of any criminal offense;

      “(b) Have been charged with any criminal offense, where such charge has not been resolved;

      “(c) Have committed acts that constitute a chargeable criminal offense;

      “(d) Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency;

      “(e) Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits;

      “(f) Are subject to a final order of removal, but who have not complied with their legal obligation to depart the United States; or

      “(g) In the judgment of an immigration officer, otherwise pose a risk to public safety or national security.”

    • It IS truly a joke. It’s shameful. How in the world GWB appointed such a person is beyond me. He either was always a left-wing moonbat or he got converted by drinking the waters out there.

    • Surely he and the DemoncRATS must know that Trump is keeping names–all 60,000 to 100,000 of them. The first time ANY OF THEM steps out of line, BOOM! This judge and the DemoncRATS and all the demonstrators will have it on THEIR heads and their consciences, if they have any. Up to 100,000 people that BARRY let in without vetting were being sent back to be “extreme vetted” and this judge just let them all pour in this weekend. Trump will KNOW who they all are and they have better BEHAVE. Or maybe, when the judge’s order is overturned, he can deport them after their visas do expire. No soup for you!

        • Notable cases ….. ^^^^ james …. BOO ! …..ha’
          Among the notable cases that Robart presided over was a breach of contract matter between Microsoft and Motorola, which determined a reasonable and non-discriminatory (“RAND”) royalty rate for a portfolio of standard essential patents (“SEPs”), including for several 802.11 (“WiFi”) and H.264 video-encoding patents.[2]

          In August 2016, Robart presided over a 2012 consent decree requiring the Seattle Police Department to address federal allegations of police bias. During the hearing, he said “black lives matter.”[3]

          On February 3, 2017, Robart granted a temporary restraining order against President Donald Trump’s immigration executive order,[4] pending review of a suit brought by Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson.[5]

          • They were just judge shopping and found a keeper. Additionally, it goes to the 9th Circuit which is the most radically leftist in the nation. No surprise they’re stalling on doing what they KNOW is the right thing–suspending the judge’s order.

        • Just another example of the GOPe getting their hands bit. IOW, a good deed never goes unpunished. When will the GOP LEARN that there’s nothing in it for them (OR US) by them trying to be bipartisan? This is what we get. Of course, GWB is a globalist and he, himself, refused to close the borders, so …

      • facebkwallflower

        I simply do not understand how a judge can rule on this. It makes no sense. Trump following law, executes the law with executive order for measures to implement laws and a judge can over ride? The judge is not Congress, Senate, or part of the governing Judicial Branch, the Supreme Court, or even part of the executive branch. So, how can this even be right. It just seems so out of order and power taken and acquiesced to. Whu is Trump abdicating this to the court just because some judge decides so? If this is allowed than none of the branches of government have any power or authority to government. So, I am confused.

        • Even though Trump will probably win in the end, if he doesn’t follow the order, then it will give the DemoncRATS and the GOPe and the RINOs in Congress an excuse to try to impeach him for “high crimes and misdemeanors,” which they could interpret as ignoring the court. Now, of course, we know that Obama did ignore the laws, the Constitution, and the court, but the same a-holes in Congress let him get away with it. Even Lindsey Graham said he doesn’t remember these same people who complain about Trump’s EOs complaining about Obama’s. This judge is thumbing his nose at Trump especially because he used part of Judge Hanen’s ruling as his rationale for applying it to the whole country.

    • My greatest desire is to see her led right into a remedial elementary school, because she obviously didn’t learn much the first time around.

  8. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/04/three-sketchy-house-intel-staffers-fired-during-probe-of-security-breach/

    This one is REALLY interesting. Consider the possibilities. WTF were they doing employing these three probably muslim stooges to be IT experts (at three times the price of other employees!) on SENSITIVE information? This is as insane as Huma Weiner being Hillary’s close confidant and body girl, with access to the private server and state secrets without the proper vetting or clearance, who sent classified info to the perverted hubby’s laptop. Trump has his work cut out for him. I want a muslim ban from our GOVERNMENT. They can all have a death wish but do they have to have one for We the People, for our country, in the name of political correctness (at best; I leave to you to figure out what at worst is)?

    “This is, well, sketchy – to say the least. The Daily Caller is reporting that three House Intelligence “staffers” have been fired as part of an ongoing security probe.

    Abid Awan, Imran Awan and Jamal Awan, are three brothers who worked within the IT department for members of the House Permanent Intelligence Committee.

    Yes, you read that correctly. …”

    The best (or worst) part is that there are MORE of this family than those three. I believe there’s an Omar and there’s also a woman named Hini Alvi, a friend or girlfriend or roommate. They “work” for DemoncRATS in the government, too. They live in Virginia. Gee, I wonder if they know Barry’s uncle or any of those other sketchy Obamas who live around there.

    • https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/02/04/three-sketchy-house-intel-staffers-fired-during-probe-of-security-breach/

      They point out in an update that these people worked for members of Congress who are briefed on impending military operations–iow, they may have known about the Yemen raid that resulted in the death of that brave Navy Seal. So, did these guys get suspended and are they under investigation for potentially tipping someone off OR is it as bad or worse in that perhaps someone in Congress did the tipping? The DemoncRATS are SO INSANE with their Trump Derangement Syndrome and SO MUCH FOR THEM is at stake that it would not surprise me in the least to see someone go so far as treason. Now add to that the FACT that, as Zenway posted, Bill Maher and his DemoncRAT krewe have been COMPARING THIS RAID TO THE BENGHAZI FIASCO. Is it beyond the realm of possibility that they would TRY to reenact a Benghazi-like failure (remember, Obama KNEW about this planned raid), sacrificing our troops, in order to find something else to use to discredit, possibly even impeach, Trump over? Did they care about the guys in Benghazi? Were they responsible for their deaths because, in order to hide what they were doing, they refused to send them help? If any of this is true, maybe it’s a great sign that these guys are being fired and hopefully fully investigated. Why, though, is there no mainstream coverage of it?

  9. possible GooD NeWS!! Maybe Soros will fade away, or better yet stripped of US citizenship .
    http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/01/29/soros-on-ropes.html

    • We can only hope and pray. I like the idea of stripping him of his citizenship. It should be possible, considering that he may be funding these anarchist, treasonous, rioters.

        • ~ …. M I L O ….. ~ …. ^^^^^^^
          Tattoos: check
          Earrings: check
          Wife-beater shirt: check

          And Best of ALL, he’s Caucasian, so nobody can call His Critics Racists.

          The Left may have won the skirmish at, BUTT’ it will lose the war. Milo Yiannopoulos does not cut & run; he retreats, regroups, & responds at
          a time of his choosing. I can think of no more splendid example of the same spirit than this: … video ^^^^ above!

      • Good. Let’s hope he gets a more civil reception this time. He may be gay, but I still think he’s cute.

        • Wow. I had forgotten altogether that Naps (Janet Napolitano) is in charge (ALLEGEDLY) out there. Figures. Nothing has changed for her. I read that video shows that the campus cops actually hid inside the buildings instead of engaging with or, better yet, ARRESTING all the rioters. Methinks they don’t arrest them because then there will be IDENTIFICATION of them and then trials and then proof about who funds them. Remember how one arrestee recently said he was bailed out by his “backers.”

          “… there is a sweeping federal anti-riot law, making it a crime to incite, organize, promote, participate in, or aid and abet a riot. In addition, the federal civil-rights laws make it a crime to conspire to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate” people “in the free exercise or enjoyment” of their constitutional rights — including, obviously, the right to free speech. These laws further criminalize forcible acts and threats that interfere with people’s lawful enjoyment of any federally subsidized activity (note that the government provides lavish funding to universities). They outlaw interference with the conduct of commercial business during a riot or other civil disorder. …”

          Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444596/berkeley-riots-sedition-laws

          BLM and others, especially those who rioted at Trump’s Inauguration, have been violating these laws for over a year now. It’s time for the DOJ to GET BUSY and prosecute these crimes. White men have civil rights, too, not only if they’re gay. ALL have civil rights, not just “minorities” or “people of color.” Consider:

          Imagine how the left would have gone BERSERK had Senator McConnell led a public chant, “Dump Obama, dump Obama, dump Obama!”

  10. Weekly address. 😀

  11. I don’t really do the Super Bowl thing, nor am I any yuge football fan, but I GOTTA LOVE IT that the PATRIOTS, led by Trump’s friend Brady, accomplished the biggest comeback in Super Bowl history (if the stories are correct. I wouldn’t know because I don’t follow NFL history.) The leftists were rooting against the Patriots (gotta love that name) and for Atlanta because of Brady (who’s white, btw, no small part of why they hate on him, and also Trump’s golfing buddy) and because it’s “PC” to root for the team of the “chocolate city” of Atlanta. Well, the Patriots WON!!! Even though not “favored.” Just like Trump. Way to go, PATRIOTS.

  12. Did we see this already? If so, worth watching again. HA!

    • It’s RIDICULOUS. Anyone with a shred of common sense can understand that no judge can rule based upon PREDICTIONS of POTENTIAL harm that SOME argue MAY happen to SOME companies and then weigh that against the POTENTIAL HARM TO ALL AMERICANS IF TERRORISTS GET IN, and then decide that the companies’ potential harm OUTWEIGHS the possibility of MASS DEATH AND DESTRUCTION (9/11?) faced by all Americans. (And that’s not even considering the FACT that no person not a U.S. citizen and not already within the U.S. has ANY Constitutional rights. And also not considering that the President, empowered by Congress AND the Constitution, has broad and in some cases SOLE power over who comes in.)

      How freaking INSANE are these DemoncRATS? If anything, it would make more sense for this judge to rule that, okay… Minnesota and Washington want them, so let them have them, let them pay for them, let them support them totally, let them KEEP THEM within their borders, employ them, school them, and then, if ANY HARM COMES FROM THEM BEING IN THEIR STATES, let those states be held RESPONSIBLE, along with this insane “judge.” No wonder Trump called him a “so-called judge;” the guy certainly has no judgment.

  13. https://www.wsj.com/articles/few-recall-gorsuchs-volunteer-work-at-harvard-1486342894

    The above link probably won’t work for a few days, if at all, if you don’t subscribe to the Wall Street Journal. The story concerns SCOTUS nominee Gorsuch. These intrepid reporters are fact-checking something from Gorsuch’s resume–that he worked as a student pro bono defender while at Harvard. Apparently, there are two public-defender-like programs for students, like internships, where they get experience by helping to defend prison inmates and others who may be too poor to afford legal representation. The story claims that people don’t remember Gorsuch in this program. However, the WH supplied the name of at least one person who remembers him from training they all had to take beforehand. This was 25 years ago and presumably individuals may not be working together, as a group. In any case, there appear to be no RECORDS kept, either, documenting ANYONE working for those two programs. So I suppose the implication is that if someone says so and there’s no PROOF that it’s true, then it MUST BE UNTRUE, even if it’s true and so, I guess, they’re calling him a liar, even though at least one person has come forward who REMEMBERS HIM in the training for the program. (In which case, to be fair, then since Obama hasn’t presented a DOCUMENTED birth certificate, then he has none and must have lied, since there’s NO EVIDENCE otherwise!) Surely others remember Gorsuch, such as the clients, but don’t count on anybody in this hateful atmosphere to come forward to help him out. One can make an educated guess that the type of people he may have helped aren’t TRUMP supporters and so aren’t likely to come out and defend Gorsuch, even if he helped defend them. In any case, my point is this:

    Did the Wall Street Journal INVESTIGATE to the nth degree Obama’s claims about his education at Columbia, where nobody in his class REMEMBERS HIM AT ALL? I don’t recall a story in the WSJ to the effect that nobody remembers going to school with Obama, even though he claims to have been there. Hmm. Bias? Nah!

    Here’s another version, in the FAKE NEWS: https://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/harvard-students-dont-remember-scotus-nominee-neil-gorsuch-volunteering-with-their-group/

  14. https://thefederalist.com/2017/02/06/16-fake-news-stories-reporters-have-run-since-trump-won/

    Good article about the media and fake news. I’m coming to the conclusion that the media simply DON’T CARE if it’s fake news. They do NO VETTING of any damaging allegations but just propagate them, because they WANT TO damage Trump, by any means necessary. Then they do the mea culpa and pass the buck when caught. It would not surprise me at all if this is just a feedback loop. They create, they propagate, they get caught, they apologize. Rinse and repeat. The descendants of the Journolist make up the fake news, publish it, it goes viral, thousands repeat it, then, when truth is revealed, they quietly add updates or just disappear the stories KNOWING THAT IN THE MEANTIME THE FLUNG DUNG WILL STICK and that those who don’t see the “corrections” will CONTINUE TO REPEAT THE LIES. Why else do they not do the slightest bit of fact-checking, such as we non-professionals do at the touch of a button?

  15. ~ Richard+in+Austin •
    ~ ….. We put a man on the Moon nearly 50 years ago.
    Tom Brady just led the biggest Comeback in SB History.
    You really don’t think we CAN ….. figure voter fraud out?
    Catherine Engelbrecht & the King Street Patriots at True the Vote just compared addresses with Google to eliminate empty lots, warehouses, dead people & the like. They did it with a small group. They did it by hand.

    There are 3,144 counties,parishes or their equivalent in the U.S., which is roughly about the same number of miles from Augusta, ME to Los Angeles, CA.

    It’s a simple matter of setting up federal election standard to require local counties to review the voting rolls for accuracy of location, duplicate entries, & the like & cull the voting records of voter registrations in empty lots, dead people, convicted felons, & the like. It’s not a lack of method..
    It’s only ever been a lack of will. …… With Republicans in control of
    32 states, now is the time to pass such a law, as most state legislatures would follow suit with a “mirror” statute to fold in state & local elections.

    • What he needs to do is get the Congress going on a federal law that makes illegally registering to vote for a federal election a FELONY. OR he needs to get Congress going on a constitutional amendment that people must prove citizenship to register to vote and to actually vote. Voter ID required–a certified birth certificate, or a certificate of naturalization, etc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s