A Post-Turkey, Post-Pie, Post-Truth Post

losercrybaby-copyOk. So now that all the Thanksgiving leftovers have been consumed and most of us are probably hitting the gym again, it’s time to talk about Hillary Clinton. I’d like to never talk about her again, but like Michael Myers, she just keeps coming back, and back, and back.

I’m sorry now to admit that when I first saw the photo at the top of this post, I felt pity (but not compassion) for that woman. She’s a self-involved individual who’s spent her entire life pursuing power, and President-elect Donald J. Trump just handed her the most stunning defeat of her lifetime, made worse by the fact that a fawning press, her minions, and word on the street all said she was a shoo-in. Together, they made her fall that much more spectacular (and arguably more pitiful).

Schadenfreude? Yeah, I felt that, too; but not because of “low self-esteem,” as that article suggests. Instead, I felt it because Hillary Clinton represents a very real threat to her opponents and, more importantly, to our country. We simply could not take another 4 to 8 years of Obama-like “fundamental transformation” of our Republic.

We should have known better than to believe that Hillary and her minions, or especially her financer and puppeteer George Soros, would accept this loss gracefully and, as progressives like to say, “Move on.”

(Allow me to interject: Remember Hillary’s campaign slogan, “I’m with her?” Is it coincidence that the late Fidel Castro forced Cubans to say or to post signs affirming, “I’m with Fidel?” What is it with progressives that they seem driven to borrow Communist slogans? Forward? Anyway …)

Now comes word that Hillary and her minions, her lawyers, her operatives, have been planning and plotting all along, from November 9, to try to “steal” the election from President-elect Trump or at least to undermine his forthcoming administration, using ginned-up post-truth,fake news” alleging Russian-rigged or hacked election results, “theft” of the election from the woman who “won” the “popular vote,”  and cries that Trump’s an “illegitimate president,” a la the 2000 election. You may ask,

What difference, at this point, does it make,

since Hillary has already conceded the election? And since the Obama administration has already avowed that there’s no evidence whatsoever of Russians (or anyone else) hacking into the election results? Since it’s never happened that anyone successfully overturned an election where the loser lost by so many votes? Since even Hillary’s people say there’s no evidence to suggest any need for recounts?

It makes plenty of difference for those who stand to see 40 to 50 years of their progressive scheming go down the tubes. Not to mention the risks they face if  President Trump decides to start turning over rocks even as he drains the swamp that is Washington DC. This is their Hail Mary pass. Their Custer’s Last Stand.

Other reasons for this stunt may be to draw out the recount processes specifically to miss deadlines and to potentially deny Trump the electoral votes that he fairly won in any or all of the contested states, or to provide a pretense for “faithless electors” to vote for Clinton instead of Trump. Or perhaps even to force the House of Representatives or the courts to make the call, thus further undermining, in their opinion, Trump’s legitimacy.

For months, we had to listen to Hillary tell us that Donald Trump was temperamentally unfit for the presidency. Take a good look at that photo, above, and tell me that she’s fit to deal with an existential threat to our nation at any time, much less at 3 a.m.

Thank you, Hillary Clinton, and all your whining, crying female supporters, for setting back women’s equality a hundred years! Does your behavior not play right into that stereotype that women have battled for decades? The one that claims that women are “temperamentally” unsuited for political office, because they’re too emotional?

Sources have told The American Spectator that on Tuesday night, after Hillary realized she had lost, she went into a rage. Secret Service officers told at least one source that she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage. Her aides could not allow her to come out in public. It would take her hours to calm down. As has been reported for years, her violent temper got the best of her. Talk about having a temperament ill-suited for having access to the atomic bomb. So Podesta went out and gave his aimless speech.

Let’s talk post-truth and fake news. The mainstream media are hyping this meme, this false narrative, that the Russians may have hacked into electronic voting machines and/or that the Russians interfered in and influenced the results of our election by producing propaganda in the form of “false” stories that were picked up and spread via social media, bloggers, and “alt-right” news outlets, who acted, at best, as “useful idiots” or pawns of the evil Russians.

However, there’s no evidence of hacking, as admitted by Barack Obama and his administration’s cybersecurity apparatus as well as by Hillary’s own people. What a spectacular fail that would have been for Obama had he allowed a foreign country to hack our election!

As for alleged “fake news” (the propaganda angle), that in itself appears to be fake news. Take a look at the stories cited as “propaganda” and untrue. The useful idiots, it’s alleged

repeatedly ran fake or inflammatory stories about Clinton’s health, the election being rigged, and protesters being paid to protest Trump.

What’s going on here? Reports about Clinton’s poor health were based upon truth. They weren’t “fake” stories. Online videos provide plenty of evidence ofdressedforfunnyfarm-copy her fragile health (e.g., coughing fits, needing to lean on something while standing, relying on stools or chairs, crossed eyes, apparent seizures. The videos are on You Tube. Believe the evidence of your own eyes, not these fake stories in the mainstream media).

As for protestors being paid to protest Trump, that was admitted to, on video, by employees of Hillary’s campaign or her supporters! (It’s on You Tube. Believe the evidence of your own eyes and ears.) There were even mainstream media stories about that truth.

Note, however, that the article cited above left itself an out. In the category of alleged Russian propaganda, the author includes this caveat: fake “or inflammatory stories.” One person’s inflammatory story is another person’s revelatory story. It all depends upon your point of view, doesn’t it?

Yet the mainstream media like to pretend that they have no particular point of view (aka bias). While the mainstream media, almost all in the tank for Hillary Clinton, would have liked to suppress the truth about Hillary’s poor health as well as the revelations about the dirty tricks her supporters played at Trump rallies, it’s obvious that, because of social media and the alternate media, the mainstream media no longer have the ability to control the “news.” All that’s left, at this point, is for them to try to discredit their competitors via allegations that they’re pawns of the Russians, racists, bigots, or stupid. In other words, by promoting fake news and post-truth narratives.

If this election should have taught the mainstream media anything, it’s that the American people are not stupid, are not useful idiots and are, in fact, much more perceptive than the mainstream elites would like to believe.

A lack of evidence hasn’t stopped the mainstream media from repeating this false narrative, this evidence-free allegation, this post-truth meme that Russian propaganda lost the election for Hillary. Why? Because the meme is helping to set the stage for Hillary’s attempt to steal the election or, at least, to undermine Trump’s presidency.

Numerous stories reported that a team of “experts” discovered anomalies in election results from “battleground states.” This was the “evidence” they have hung their hats on, with regard to reporting on the alleged justification for recounts.

Another team of so-called expert, but anonymous, “independent researchers” created this false narrative about Russian propaganda influencing the election.  Ironically, one particular story is the source of the propaganda about Russian propaganda. Most mainstream stories cited this one article (this one propagandist, one might say) and so those who picked up the meme could be said to have served as “useful idiots” for that author. His story was certainly “useful” to Hillary Clinton, and anyone who still opposes Trump’s election.

Another meme propagated throughout the mainstream media claims that Hillary Clinton has a “historical” lead in the popular vote. Yesterday, President-elect Trump pointed out, correctly, that if one subtracts from her total the millions of illegal aliens who voted, then he would have won the popular vote in a landslide, as he won the electoral votes in a landslide.

The mainstream media were quick, and typically wrong, to state (in every story that I read) that Trump has “no evidence” that illegal aliens voted. But he does!

A group of experts, a group of “independent researchers,” have proven (based on verified evidence and upon self-reports, in many instances) that millions of illegal aliens are registered to vote and did vote in 2008 and 2010. Others claim that an estimated 3 million illegal aliens voted in the 2016 election. These illegal aliens overwhelmingly vote Democrat.

It’s seems likely to be true that millions of illegals voted, given that Barack Obama encouraged them to vote and that many states allow illegal aliens to register to vote and prohibit election workers from asking anyone for proof of citizenship.

Obviously, because the mainstream media universally claim that there’s “no evidence” that millions of illegals vote in our elections, they would label these researchers’ work as “fake news” and “post-truth” narratives. One writer, in fact, calls this Trump’s “biggest lie” ever. (So much for respect for the office.)

It remains to be seen how the mainstream media treat the real news that True the Vote, another well-known and well-respected group of experts, backs up Trump’s claim that millions of illegal aliens voted in the 2016 election:

True the Vote absolutely supports President-elect Trump’s recent comment about the impact of illegal voting, as reflected in the national popular vote. We are still collecting data and will be for several months, but our intent is to publish a comprehensive study on the significant impact of illegal voting in all of its many forms and begin a national discussion on how voters, states, and the Trump Administration can best address this growing problem.

Dueling experts. A truly unbiased and objective mainstream media would report the results from all participants and let We the People decide. That, however, is exactly what they do not want to do, as the mainstream media has become an arm of the Democrat/progressive propaganda machine (as proved by Wikileaks).

In the opinion of most mainstream media elites, the people cannot be trusted to make up our own minds. Just see what happens when We the People decide:

Donald_Trump_Marines_April_2015 - Copy


127 responses to “A Post-Turkey, Post-Pie, Post-Truth Post

  1. Barry just doesn’t get it!! 😆

  2. Pray for the people of, Gatlinburg and Pidgeon Forge Tenn, ❤

    • Who’ll support her now that Hillary lost and doesn’t need her anymore? I mean, all those cute young sycophants in NY, after all, jogging, hiking, shopping.


    • ^^^^^ BELOW IS JUST PART of the GAME PLAN! ..BUTT’ it FAILED! ha

      But such a symbolic victory is less enticing for Johnson than the potential Prize he could WIN for his party. If Johnson Snags 5 %…. of the national Popular Vote, the Federal Election Commission will classify the Libertarians as an official “minor party,” granting the 2020 nominee a Lump Sum of Cash $$$$$ …. for the fall campaign, Courtesy of the American Taxpayer.

      (And don’t you think for a second that the vehemently anti-big-government Libertarians won’t cash that BIG Government Check in a heart-beat.) !!ha

    • Oh, indeed. He’d better. Wouldn’t the lamestream go berserk? REAL PEOPLE with real questions pertinent to the real people! What a unique idea.

  4. Phooey!
    I like cornflakes.
    From Breitbart:
    “We regularly work with our media-buying partners to ensure our ads do not appear on sites that aren’t aligned with our values as a company,” said Kellogg’s flak Kris Charles. “We recently reviewed the list of sites where our ads can be placed and decided to discontinue advertising on Breitbart.com. We are working to remove ads from that site.”

    Kellogg’s offered no examples of how Breitbart’s 45 million monthly readers fail to align with the breakfast maker’s values. Indeed, the move appears to be one more example of an out-of-touch corporation embracing false left-wing narratives used to cynically smear the hard working Americans that populate this nation’s heartland.

    oh well, I guess boycotts work both ways.

    I will switch to cheerios.

    By the way,
    Breitbart also reports that Jill Stein had to find 27000 voters in Pa to file an affadavit to force a recount in that state. It requires three voters per each county to file the registered affadavit.

    That’s a pretty tall order.
    I wonder if the machine can fix that too.

    • If there’s an Aldi store near you or Trader Joe’s, they have generic cereals that are really comparable to the name brands.

      • facebkwallflower

        My family thinks Aldi cereals are actually THE BEST!

        • You know. They really are. Ditto for a lot of their products. Whenever I do end up, for one reason or another, buying a brand name, it suffers by comparison. I love their cookies, hummus, canned goods, cheeses. Saves you a lot of money.

    • Unbelievable as it seems, one of the most rabid pro-DemoncRAT columnists today said it’s “dirty tricks” to try to overturn Trump’s election via recounts. His argument, which is so true, is that waiting WEEKS to do the recounts just makes for funny business and the possibility of a real steal of the election. My opinion exactly. At this point, IF discrepancies are found, then how will someone determine WHEN the hacking or rigging happened? On election day OR AFTER IT? They waited weeks … WHY? Because by then they were assured that just enough rigged up ballots were “found” or memory cards were adequately stolen and replaced to give them the steal? I’m not joking. Where have the machines and their memory cards been these past weeks? Who can ensure that they haven’t been tampered with since election day? The precincts being recounted in PA are exactly the MOST DEMOCRATIC ones, where it’s most likely that shenanigans would be perpetrated by the usual suspects. I have NO FAITH in these people or this recount. Stein is claiming that her rationale is the tens of thousands of “undercounts” in the states, where people didn’t vote for president. WELL, so what? PLENTY OF PEOPLE DIDN’T LIKE EITHER CANDIDATE, so it’s no surprise if 80,000 people in one state left that question blank. The danger lies in the FACT that these places have had 3 weeks to FIND THE BLANK BALLOTS AND FILL IN THE BLANK FOR THE VOTER. It’s like with Florida, when people were using magnifying glasses to try to perceive a pencil mark where there was none. How hard would it be to rig it NOW? They know exactly how many votes they need to overcome AND they are corrupt to the core, as we know. Their problem, their entire problem, is what I said before: They’ve always rigged elections. They have to be careful in their rigging, to make it seem “reasonable,” so they can’t bogus-up 20,000 votes in one precinct. A little here; a little there. The reason they’re pissed about the polls is that’s how they determine exactly how and where they need to rig to make the results LOOK plausible. This election didn’t work for them because people LIED to the pollsters and also because they vastly underestimated turnout for Trump. The forgotten people got remembered real quick. So now Hillary and her minions are trying for another bite at the FRAUD apple. It’s comforting, though, to see so many DemoncRATS decrying the recounts. In addition, the Green Party is disavowing her. Since she collected the money in their name, they ought to put a STOP to the recounts. Ditto for Hillary, but she’s IN ON IT from the get-go.

    • I buy store brands. 😀

      • You know what you can do? If anybody in your family insists on name brands, just keep one box and pull the sleeve out of the generic and slide it into the box. Voila! Name brand cereal. 🙂

    • Thanks James. I love these productions, they’re great. It didn’t get past me that the first name in the credits is Walter Francis Fitzpatrick III. Wow.

  5. Don’t all cheer at once!
    On Drudge:
    Thu Dec 01 2016 9:01:21 ET

    CNN President Jeff Zucker is actively perusing FOX star Megyn Kelly to anchor 8 or 9 PM on his network, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. And Kelly might just say, YES!

    “He is moving the Himalayan mountains to get her,” a top insider explains. “But they are tripped up on money. He simply can’t pay her the $20 million a year FOX has on the table.”

    Kelly’s contract is up in July 2017.


    For Kelly, a move to Columbus Circle would represent a fresh break from a turbulent 18 months at FOXNEWS. And the chance to go directly against arch-nemesis Bill O’Reilly will be hard to resist.

    Meanwhile, the highs and lows of the Trump and Roger Ailes dramas have taken a toll.

    The anchor is “despised” by fellow on-air talent. And FOX insiders describe how it’s gotten only worse since the release of her book, which is expected to end the holidays under 500,000 total copies sold. [Megyn refused to promote her book on both O’Reilly and Hannity, foreshadowing a move.]

    Zucker at CNN would compensate her salary with heavy promotion and synergy across all TIME WARNER outlets.

    A top source close to the action describes how Megyn would be an immediate international star at CNN. “It’s the opportunity of lifetime.”

    “She could even star in a movie at WARNER BROS.”

    But what do you think?

    Stardom awaits you.
    I stopped watching her show a year ago, well before the Trump stuff even started. She just becane too “all that”. The Kelly file became the Megyn show.
    If Fox is desparate to hold on to her, they shouldn’t be. She was good but she’s not now.

  6. She has devolved!!! 😆

    • I love Dolly Parton. She has it all. Brains, talent, beauty, great song-writing ability, great voice, great musicianship, wonderful marriage, funny, down-home, beloved, religious. She’s a national treasure. She lives her Christian faith. Such an inspiring person.

    • I seem to recall another president’s wife and ex-first-lady ALSO claiming that she’d never run for the presidency. The Obama rule applies: Whatever they say emphatically, the opposite is true. She’ll just have “no choice” when all the powers that be and all the little people just BEG her, literally BEG her, to run because the DemonRats have no young up-and-coming candidates and she’s “so popular” and she’d be a historic figure: Not only the first woman president but the first black woman president. Can they resist? I think not. They’re LYING.

    • I am so stoked about having a Defense Secretary nicknamed “MAD DOG.” Ya gotta love it. That sends a message to our enemies!

    • Funny how the media are going nutz now, saying Trump’s using government to threaten private businesses when (1) Trump is not IN government (yet) and (2) Barry did the same and worse to banks and other companies (such as the auto companies) when he first came into office. I don’t recall the media worrying about free enterprise then. (That’s not to say that I’m comfortable with this giving incentives to companies to stay. We the People are on the hook for too much going to pick and choose winners and losers. It’s like with TIF. Don’t like it. Just level the playing field, lower business taxes, and get out of the way.)

  7. ” JOE ” OUR PLUMBER …. Dec. 3 rd ….is HIS BIRTHDAY


  8. He ran for the U.S. House of Representatives in 2012, winning the Republican primary for Ohio’s 9th congressional district but lost to Democratic Marcy Kaptur by a landslide. …..^^^^^^

    Wurzelbacher says his life has settled down since the madness of 2008. He got married five years ago. He has a three-year-old daughter and one-year-old son, and a 20-year-old son living in Kentucky. He now spends his time running two websites, JoeforAmerica.com, and one his wife inspired, livingloving.com.



    • So now Glenn Beck is “alt-right”, too? This is insane. The entire lamestream media are the “alt-left,” proven racists and bigots and biased against conservatives, heterosexuals, Christians, anyone who’s not from their “protected minorities: (e.g. “persons of color”). It’s time we called them names back. The alt-left. A bunch of stupid bigots, fascists, and BROWNSHIRTS.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s