Arrogant Leftist Elitists Hate Us

Donald_Trump_Marines_April_2015 - Copy

Peggy Noonan has explained, in a nutshell, why people still support Donald Trump (whether she knows it or not). Writing about the leaked Clinton emails, Noonan said, [emphasis added to quotes]

The big fact of the week, however, has to do with these words: They don’t like us. The Democrats, progressives and left-liberals who have been embarrassed by the latest WikiLeaks dump really hate conservatives, or nonleftists. They don’t like half the people of the country they seek to control! They look at that half with disdain and disrespect. Their disdain is not new — “bitter clingers,” “basket of deplorables.” But here it’s so unashamed and eager to express itself. …

Noonan nails the disdainful attitude leftist elites, such as Hillary Clinton and the Obamas, share towards evangelical Christians and Catholics. Imagining a conversation with her Catholic grandmother, she writes:

Grandma, being Catholic is now a step up. It means you’re an aristocrat! A stupid one, but still …

In the progressive world, a person is simply stupid, and “backward,” to believe in any religion.

Now of course Hillary suddenly professes to be a devout Methodist, as Obama claims to be a Christian, and Biden, Pelosi, the Kennedys, and Kaine claim to be Catholics. But everybody knows that’s all just for show. Another leaked email proves that Hillary admits to having a public face and a private face. To get the votes of those stupid religious “folks,” all leftists must pretend to be religious.

But We the People refuse to let the leftist/media cabal tear us away from Donald Trump. Noonan writes,

Here’s what you see in the emails: the writers are the worst kind of snobs, snobs with nothing to recommend them. In their expression and thoughts they are common, banal, dumb, uninformed, parochial.

I don’t know about you but when people look down on me I want them to be distinguished or outstanding in some way — towering minds, people of exquisite sensibility or learning. Not these grubbly poseurs, these people who’ve never had a thought but only a sensation: Christians are backward, I saw it in a movie!

It’s the big fact of American life now, isn’t it?

That we are patronized by our inferiors.

Trump doesn’t look down on us or act as if he believes he’s fundamentally or intrinsically worth more than we are. Hillary, who is not the smartest but may be the most corrupt woman in the world, does indeed look down on us all.

Choose wisely. Stay the course. Vote to

Make America Great Again.



117 responses to “Arrogant Leftist Elitists Hate Us

  1. TOTAL FILTH .. just thinking about THEM SELLING THEIR SOULS?
    MENTAL CASES ONE & ALL … SOROS …puke twice!

  2. ‘Make Soros Happy’: Clinton Campaign Discusses Importance of Pleasing Billionaire in Leaked Email …..^^^^^^^^

    “I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy),” the email states

    Mikael Thalen | – October 17, 2016 ~ 530 Comments

  3. O’ ha … GAY BOY “ROBBY” MOOK … yep he’s slimy 4sure

    POLITICO Reporter Offered Podesta Chance to Edit Story…
    CNN declares unlawful for public to search WIKILEAKS…
    DUMP #10… …BRING IT ON!!!!!!
    MOOK: ‘MAKE SOROS HAPPY’… ???????
    Many coincidences in assaults on Trump…
    POLL: 41% say election could be ‘stolen’…
    Massive Voter Fraud Investigation TX…
    40% say tension with family, friends…
    O’KEEFE: Clinton Campaign Incites Violence at Trump Rallies…


    Oh, so wonderful. NOW the FBI agents are champing at the bit and ready to talk–ONCE CONGRESS COMES BACK AND THEY ARE CALLED TO SPEAK. Uh, that means NOT UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION will the FBI agents speak about the corruption in the FBI and the non-indictment of Hillary Clinton. Way to go patriots! OUT WITH IT NOW IF YOU GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY.

  6. like tooth-paste..^^^ I would like to step on each one of the DICKS!


    • Ha, Zenway. You read my mind. I almost wrote that they should stand up and be men but then I thought that was kind of sexist of me. I mean, there are probably some female FBI agents that are AFRAID and more worried about their careers than their entire country and entire future of the entire freaking world, aren’t there? Get some backbone, people. At least do what Snowden or Assange did. There’s PROBABLY SOMETHING YOU CAN LEAK FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY. ARE YOU JUST GOING TO STAND BY AND LET THIS CORRUPT CABAL GET EVEN MORE POWER?


    • I almost choked when I saw that they claim they’ve “always operated according to the highest ethical and legal standards.” The fact they FIRED that guy PROVES that’s a lie. He was their employee. He operated illegally and unethically and admitted to doing so despite advice to the contrary and now they claim that they ALWAYS OPERATED legally and ethically? That’s impossible, given the circumstances. It happened on their watch. It’s not any different from making the head of Wells Fargo resign because of what low-level employees did fraudulently.

      It’s amazing how, when progressives are involved, the BUCK STOPS AT THE LOWER LEVELS and the higher ups (Clinton, Obama, the heads of this organization, Podesta, etc.) get out of jail free. They’re already saying that Clinton wasn’t involved directly in any of these emails or activities, so somehow she’s off the hook. Like Foval said, “plausible deniability” only in this case it’s neither PLAUSIBLE nor deniable. I’m sick to death of these double standards.

      As for Hillary, the same deal with the FBI/State Dept. quid pro quo. Oh, they say, it didn’t directly involve her or there’s no “evidence” of any quid pro quo. But the email actually uses that term! If you read the stories closely, Clintonesquely, they say that no FBI agents were actually sent to Iraq or other countries that the FBI wanted into “as a result of conversations.” Whoo, boy. Do they think we’re stupid?

      My newspaper revealed something amazing. The State Dept. (Kennedy) wanted to classify this Benghazi email under a category B9, which is for “unclassified” but some kind of category that’s sensitive and EXEMPT FROM FOIA REQUESTS . The reason it’s kept from FOIA under that classification is that it IS SUPPOSED TO involve ” geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells and is the most rarely used FOIA exemption.” (That’s because how many WELLS do they create documents about?)

      Although it’s still never been released, you know that ANY EMAIL Clinton received about Benghazi, especially one they wanted/needed to HIDE was NOT involved with any WELLS. Wells? It’s the only classification that would allow the State Dept. to say that Sullivan, who sent her this email on her unsecured server, and Hillary didn’t put “classified” information on her server but STILL KEEP IT FROM THE PUBLIC. So they were, in essence, asking for a quid pro quo and asking them to LIE about the content by classifying this email as being about WELLS, for goodness sake. A total lie.

      What I’m wondering is why this Sullivan guy, who knowingly sent this message to Hillary on her PRIVATE SERVER, is not himself under investigation. Ditto for ANYBODY at the Dept. of State or the WH or any other agency that handles top secret information who SENT HER CLASSIFIED STUFF ON HER PRIVATE SERVER. Isn’t that a crime, too? Not just on her part but also on their parts?

      Here’s the thing: Suppose YOU were a government employee, trained in the handling of classified information. Suppose somebody asked you to send classified documents TO A PRIVATE EMAIL SERVER. Not to a .gov address. To a PRIVATE server. Knowing what you had to know, from your TRAINING, would you do it? Would you CHOOSE TO BREAK THE LAW?

      HOW did ALL OF THESE PEOPLE make the decision to break what they KNOW is the law and go along with Hillary’s demands, anyway? That alone shows the corruption. Why was there not even ONE PATRIOT (or was there, who we don’t know about?) who REFUSED to do it and who would blow the whistle on this illegal system?

      I’m really disappointed (to say the least) in the lack of integrity and morals shown by our government employees. I’m serious when I suggest that THIS is exactly how things began in Nazi Germany and Stalin’s Russia. People in government feared to stand up and speak out and incrementally things got worse and worse until the pogroms, genocide, the gulags.

      Are these Americans? I mean, what has happened to the CHARACTER of Americans? It can’t happen here. RIGHT. To this day, progressives still pursue the old guys who trained dogs used at the death camps. What hypocrites they all are.

      • To add insult to injury, NOW the State Dept. spokesperson, some guy named Toner, probably realizing how bad it looks that Kennedy wanted to use a classification for MAPS ABOUT WELLS to hide that email while claiming it wasn’t “classified” and so wasn’t a crime for her to have on her server, suddenly came up with a new excuse/spin: Probably Kennedy meant B7 not B9! Oh, yeah. That’s the ticket. It was just a typo. Haven’t we heard that one before, with regard to Barry’s documents and discrepancies on them that make no sense?

  8. Here’s a little nugget I just ran across: Remember the Wikileak about Podesta and some guy named “Sandy Newman” plotting to infiltrate and create a “revolution” within the “severely backwards” Catholic Church (foment a “Catholic Spring”)? Guess what? We’ve run across this Newman guy before. I didn’t put it together because his name is really SANFORD Newman. He, it was, who first HIRED BARRY AS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER TO RUN PROJECT VOTE. OMG. You cannot make this stuff up:

    “”The time has come to lift the veil and reveal the untold story of America’s Radical-in-Chief and his socialist political world.”

    Now that the Obama Administration has announced that it will not defend the Defense of Marriage Age and many think that presidential candidate Obama misled them when he discussed marriage at the Saddlebrook Forum during the 2008 presidential campaign, it was be an especially good time to point out that people were misled about Obama, lest his radicalness be appreciated and make him unelectable as President.

    Unfortunately, the truth about ACORN, Project Vote, Obama and Obama mentor Sandy Newman is still not generally known.

    “‘Project Vote! is nonpartisan, strictly nonpartisan. But we do focus our efforts on minority voters, and on states where we can explain to them why their vote will matter. Braun made that easier in Illinois.’ So [Sandy] Newman decided to open a Cook County Project Vote! office and went looking for someone to head it. The name Barack Obama surfaced. ‘I was asking around among community activists in Chicago and around the country, and they kept mentioning him,’ Newman says. Obama by then was working with church and community leaders on the West Side, and he was writing a book that the publisher Simon & Schuster had contracted for while he was editor of the law review. He was 30 years old. When Newman called, Obama agreed to put his other work aside. ‘I’m still not quite sure why,’ Newman says. ‘This was not glamorous, high-paying work. But I am certainly grateful. He did one hell of a job.'” [Chicago Magazine, 1/93]

    Obama had help. To help the man picked by Newman to head Illinois Project Vote, there were 22 steering committee members. Among Obama’s steerers: rev. Jeremiah Wright, Father Ffleger, Madeline Talbott (head of Illinois ACORN) and Keith Kelleher (head of ACORN-controlled SEIU Local 100 and husband of Talbott). …”

    Right. They were nonpartisan, all right. The story goes on to explain that Project Vote was designed to register Democrat voters (blacks, homeless, welfare recipients) in major cities like Chicago and in Pennsylvania (where Black Panthers intimidated whites in the Obama elections). It was, in essence, and arm of the disgraced ACORN. As an aside: Remember that Martha Trowbridge tried to say Barry’s mother was some woman named Newman? She posited a relationship to this self-same “Sandy” Newman.

    And so we go round and round and round.

    • “Untold damage” done by Podesta’s little revolutionary groups:

      “Archbishop Charles J. Chaput did not enjoy his first and only encounter with two leaders of Catholics United.

      “It was an interesting experience,” Archbishop Chaput recounted in his Oct. 13 column for Catholic Philly magazine.

      Both men were obvious flacks for the Obama campaign and the Democratic Party – creatures of a political machine, not men of the Church; less concerned with Catholic teaching than with its influence,” he said.

      “And presumably (for them) bishops were dumb enough to be used as tools, or at least prevented from helping the other side. …

      In his column, Archbishop Chaput recounted his visit from two young men from Catholics United just weeks before the 2008 presidential election between Barack Obama and John McCain.

      The two men “voiced great concern at the manipulative skill of Catholic agents for the Republican Party,” Archbishop Chaput reported. “And they hoped my brother bishops and I would resist identifying the Church with single-issue and partisan (read: abortion) politics.”

      “Yet these two young men not only equaled but surpassed their Republican cousins in the talents of servile partisan hustling,” the archbishop charged. “Thanks to their work, and activists like them, American Catholics helped to elect an administration that has been the most stubbornly unfriendly to religious believers, institutions, concerns and liberty in generations.

      “I never saw either young man again. The cultural damage done by the current White House has – apparently — made courting America’s bishops unnecessary,” the archbishop lamented. “But bad can always get worse.””

      btw, Sandy Newman, who sought to make a revolution in the Catholic Church, is Jewish. Robert F. Kennedy, another nominal Catholic, like Podesta, was recruited to help undermine his own supposed religion!

      And now they want Catholics to help elect Crooked Hillary, who will continue the damage done. She’ll be the third Obama administration.

      • More from that article:

        “The archbishop lamented that in a country where the concept of choice is “the unofficial state religion,” the menu is “remarkably small.”

        His unnamed attorney interlocutor also reflected on the state of the country, saying that before the leaks there was been “strong evidence” of the current administration’s hostility to religious organizations.

        “Now there is clear proof that this approach is deliberate and will accelerate if these actors have any continuing, let alone louder, say in government,” the attorney said, according to the archbishop’s column.

        The attorney charged there is an active strategy to shape Catholicism into the religion the political leaders wish.

        “Look where we are now. We have political actors trying to orchestrate a coup to destroy Catholic values, and they even analogize their takeover to a coup in the Middle East, which amplifies their bigotry and hatred of the Church,” the attorney said. …”

        THIS IS WHY THE MEDIA WILL NOT COVER THIS INCENDIARY STORY and instead settle on the quid pro quo email as the one most easily obfuscated and so they can IGNORE the ones that will outrage more people and still pretend to be covering the Wikileaks.

        • Another good article on the subject of interfering in the RELIGIOUS RIGHTS OF CATHOLICS and seeking to overthrow the authority of their church. THIS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, IMHO–using political power and government power and not-for-profit status to interfere with the First Amendment rights of other citizens. Imagine if the conservatives tried to do something similar in Muslim mosques or the Jewish temples. The Church should sue these people for violation of their First Amendment rights–the free exercise of their religion without interference from the GOVERNMENT, aka OBAMA.

          “Beginning in 2007, orthodox Catholic writers including myself wrote dozens of articles in an attempt to expose the funding and duplicitousness of two fake Catholic groups: the George Soros-funded Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Catholics United. … Now, with the release of the leaked emails this week from longtime Democratic Party operative and current Clinton campaign chair, John Podesta, there is confirmation that Podesta personally helped to launch these two progressive groups to infiltrate the Catholic Church in an attempt to provide a liberal revolt against the US bishops. Calling it a “Catholic Spring,” Podesta acknowledged that he “created” these groups to begin a progressive revolution in the Catholic Church. …”


    “Wikileaks said Tuesday that Secretary of State John Kerry asked Ecuador to stop WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, from publishing leaked emails that could disrupt peace negotiations with a guerrilla group in Colombia. …”

    For good measure, they added the crap rationalization about talks with guerrillas in Colombia.

  10. will her day … get leaked also … I pray for that & O’s TRUTH
    a 2 faced …dreamer of dark-dreams … USE EVERY-ONE !!!
    THEY JUST WORK the CROWDS … that’s ALL they KNOW!
    Like MILKING a COW ….BUTT” they DON’T S T O P EVER!
    Snot …running from her NOSE … that’s who she really IS!!! YEP!

  11. Hey, did they find Kim’s ring YET? ^^^ A Crooked TOP for the CROOKED team… does she think Skimpy under-Sized tops really work 4 HER?
    Hand over HEART ~ 2 LITTLE 2 LATE weirdo …. BUTT’ WHAT do WTP know ???
    O’ just what we SEE HEAR & KNOW … that’s all

    • Hey. First thought I had was that it was staged. Are their finances going the way of other infamous celebs who had money problems, such as Willie Nelson?

  12. Obama has held 13 state dinners during nearly eight years in office, two more than President George W. Bush, who held 11, but fewer than other recent predecessors, according to the White House Historical Association. President Bill Clinton far exceeded both of his successors with 28 dinners during his two terms in office. … so ..spend all ya can …IT’S FREE!

    State Dinner guest list:
    Follow Darlene Superville on Twitter:

    • Supposedly their last State Dinner and they’re claiming Moo looked smashing. (I have to admit it WAS a beautiful dress. Rose gold and shiny and flowing. Not that SHE did it any justice.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s