Identitarian Movement in Europe

A response to the threat of Islamization and the loss of cultural identity is brewing among the young people of Europe.  The “identitarian movement” began in France in 2002.  Subtitles in the video above explain the viewpoint of the German youth who are increasingly concerned about losing their ethnic identities, because of far-left ideology with its suicidal political correctness.

Below is a rough translation of the text posted along with the You Tube video:

Young people come together to reclaim their identity! #ZukunftEuropa

One generation, one destiny, one last chance!

This is not just a motto, but the every day goal of a movement that sees itself as a living covenant and as a community of destiny! We are a movement of young people who resist liberal leftist indoctrination!

We can no longer remain silent! We see how our values ​​and  our culture are in decline, as our home and our traditions are increasingly destroyed, and how freedom gives way to political correctness.

We are united by destiny to be the last generation that can turn things around again! What unites us is the self-knowledge to be the phalanx, which must take action against the self-destructive, ever-growing multicultural ideology that drives mass immigration and Islamization, and thus the ultimate disappearance of the thousands-of-years-old family of nations called Europe, and their cultural traditions.

We stand together in our quest to protect our homeland, to restore the freedom and sovereignty of our country, and to fight for the preservation of our ethno-cultural identity!

But with idealism alone this fight cannot be won! Courage, dedication, and sacrifice will not suffice …

Following comes a pitch for monetary support of their movement.

Not surprisingly, the usual suspects rush to label these young people as “far right,” although similar movements or groups, such as Black Lives Matter or La Raza, are never called far right (or even far left).

Indeed, here in the USA, “diversity” is celebrated, although it does seem that certain ethnic groups are not allowed (by political correctness) to be proud of or to seek to preserve their own cultural identities. Like Europe, however, we must be ever on guard against Islamization.

This story explains the recent growth of the identitarian movement across Europe:

Originally the youth wing of the far-right anti-immigrant policy, it has since developed into its own entity and spread throughout Europe.

Young people in Greece, Austria, Germany, and the UK have joined in protesting the leftward march of the European Union, particularly in the face of EU policies regarding the acceptance of and catering to migrant populations.

We here in the USA are accustomed to a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, racially diverse nation, although still (so far, by the grace of God) united under one system of government (a Constitutional Republic) with one system of justice.

Europe, however,  is comprised of many smaller nations. Each country has traditionally been relatively homogeneous–each typically with its own culture, ethnic identity, racial identity, and even language.

Is it wrong, racist, xenophobic, or Islamophobic for these young people to wish to preserve their traditions, their cultures, their countries? Is it fair to label them as bigots or compare them to Nazis? NO!

What next for the European Union?

There was a time when the entire world decried ethnic cleansing.

Whether it’s done outright by force, as in Nazi Germany, or incrementally by stealth (or civilizational) jihad, the result is the same.

Is it wrong for these European youths to take a stand against the ethnic cleansing of their own identities?

Imagine a world without Irish culture, Swedish culture, Italian culture, Greek culture, Spanish culture, French culture, et cetera.

It’s beyond imagining.


99 responses to “Identitarian Movement in Europe

  1. You can no longer trust Fox News,
    I think most of us know this but here’s the story about the sickening
    sellout from Murdoch:
    Fox mogul Rupert Murdoch is partnered in multiple media ventures with Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaweed Bin Talal, including an Arabic religious TV network with a direct tie to Hillary Clinton’s top aide Huma Abedin.

    Both Prince Alwaweed Bin Talal and Murdoch’s Fox News network have become vocal critics of GOP Presidential frontrunner Donald Trump. On December 11, 2015 Bin Tala took to Twitter to savage Trump:

    You are a disgrace not only to the GOP but to all America.

    Withdraw from the U.S presidential race as you will never win.

    — الوليد بن طلال (@Alwaleed_Talal) December 11, 2015

    The Al-Resalah TV network is a venture created by Alwaleed in association with Rupert Murdoch. As The Guardian reported in 2010:

    A company headed by the Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed bin Talal says it plans to launch a new Arabic television news channel in partnership with Rupert Murdoch’s Fox network. The prince said the Kingdom Holding company’s 24-hour channel “will be an addition and alternative” for Arab viewers. It will compete with al-Arabiya and al-Jazeera.

    Al-Resalah TV’s stated goal is to “present true Islam” but the network’s programming has been often been radical. As The Sun reported in 2006:
    yada yada yada
    Sorry fox, it was nice to know ya,
    sorry you played us all for chumps,
    because we’re not that.

  2. Fox lost their fair and balanced. 😡

  3. **What’s a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ and why a U.S. President Must Be One, with KrisAnne Hall** ……Published on Aug 24, 2015

    A U.S. President can have no fractionalized loyalty must be loyal to the United States first and only; and that unbroken loyalty would be proven, in part, by the fact that both parents were citizens of the United States and establishing that the candidate would have been raised in a home with loyalty only to the United States…

    Publius Huldah: The Constitution, Vattel, and ‘Natural Born Citizen’:
    The crucial element: § 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

    Publius Huldah: “A “natural born” citizen inherits his citizenship from his parents. Just as he inherits his eye and hair color from them, so he inherits his citizenship status. He is “born” with the hair and eye color his parents gave him, and he is “born” with the citizenship status they gave him. No provision in the Constitution made him a Citizen – no Act of Congress made him a Citizen – just as no provision in the Constitution or Act of Congress determined his eye or hair color. His citizenship, eye color, and hair color are all inherited from his parents. THAT’s what a natural born citizen is. READ all of the sections on this which Vattel wrote: By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers; the place of birth produces no change in this particular. In my first paper, you can find the links to Vattel and other original source documents illustrating the original intent of “natural born citizen”.”

    Who is KrisAnne Hall?:

    KrisAnne Hall is an attorney and former prosecutor, fired after teaching the Constitution to TEA Party groups – she would not sacrifice liberty for a paycheck. She is a disabled veteran of the US Army, a Russian linguist, a mother, a pastor’s wife and a patriot. She now travels the country and teaches the Constitution and the history that gave us our founding documents. KrisAnne Hall does not just teach the Constitution, she lays the foundations that show how reliable and relevant our founding documents are today. She presents the “genealogy” of the Constitution – the 700 year history and five foundational documents that are the very roots of American Liberty.


  5. ~ Tina Trent DrArtaud • 13 hours ago

    Don’t forget pipelines. Of course oil companies could use trains, but they make more with pipelines, which is why all the libertarian donors subsidizing Ed and others’ screeds against Trump use eminent domain regularly.

    Cruz’ donors use eminent domain every day to build their pipelines — you can google the lawsuits. Ditto Rubio, Bush, and Paul. The oil money behind Club for Growth (endorsing Cruz, Rubio, Bush, Paul) uses eminent domain every day. But Cruz is willing to stay silent on his donors’ actions as he takes their money. He’s just avoiding the issue, and his followers have squeezed their eyes shut to avoid the truth as they shriek “but Trump uses eminent domain!” Worst, writers like Ed and many, many others here, at National Review, Fox, etc. have built, to paraphrase the great film, Elf, a throne of lies about eminent domain being a relevant issue only about the one time Trump used it, not the thousands of times the people who sign their paychecks use it. Cruz’ campaign is built on pipeline money acquired by his lying donors through declaring eminent domain over other people’s property to enhance ther profits.

    What a bunch of cynical liars. I really expected more from the editors here and elsewhere. What a cynical, dishonest smear campaign.

  6. ~Vinchenz • 16 hours ago

    One position Trump hasn’t changed EVER on is that America and Americans come first. I’m good being a single issue voter – because that one issue never crosses the minds of the other candidates, proven these last 7 years without a doubt.

    Check out Trump’s pro-American video. It’s energetic and American.

    You don’t need Facebook to access the video btw.

  7. CLINTON 642
    SANDERS 638

    CRUZ 28%
    TRUMP 24%
    RUBIO 23%

  8. Likely Zika Virus not an accidental outbreak
    This virus could case de-population of the warm countries that have
    the moquito carrier and spare the colder northern countries where the elites live (who probably designed this virus)
    The virus works by causing mental birth defects to children born of mothers who are infected with the virus. More importantly I guess to the planners is it will cause women to avoid becoming pregnant.
    A virus deformed child will need to be cared for for his entire life,
    Doesn’t get much more evil than this.

    • OMG. If this is true, it’s horrible AND evil. They thought they were going to help prevent dengue; instead, if this is the cause, they released Zika on all those unsuspecting mothers. Like Thalidomide, huh? Could be that the UN and the rest of them are trying hard to get ahead of this virus BECAUSE they know they’re complicit in it. One thing, though. And I hate saying anything that’s positive about Barry, but in this case I seriously doubt he would be in on depopulating a country that’s “brown” and “black” like Brazil. If this were occurring in the U.S., then I could totally believe it. This will be a risk for Africa, too. I’m supposing they don’t have much of a mosquito problem in Saudi Arabia, though, huh? Buy stock in Cutter?

  9. ~ Jan February 2, 2016 at 5:50 pm

    Illinois Board just declared Cruz eligible to run for Pres

    ~ drkate February 2, 2016 at 5:59 pm

    not a judge but an election board?
    any link?

    ~ Jan February 2, 2016 at 6:25 pm

    Election Board, no link, just heard on radio

    ~ no-nonsense-nancy February 2, 2016 at 6:43 pm

    An election board can’t do that. I am a judge of elections and I certainly don’t have that power.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s