On the subject of Syria, ISIS, and “refugees”, Bill O’Reilly opined that Barack Obama is “delusional.” Donald Trump said, with particular insight, that Obama “doesn’t have a clue or he does have a clue and he has evil intentions–I don’t know.” A writer at WND has similar questions:
In every area, Obama demonstrates an unfortunate affinity for that which normal people would describe as destructive, corrupt, evil.
Whether this is because Obama is evil at his core, or whether there’s a decent person locked up inside but who has been traumatized and brainwashed – a Manchurian president, programmed not by exotic far-off communist brainwashers, but by a nonstop sequence of corrupting influences throughout his life – is not ours to know.
Why is Obama fixated upon bringing these “refugees” into this country? Because he knows We the People and 32 state governors reject them, for our own safety? Is it the Imp of the Perverse who drives him, because nobody tells Obama what to do?
A recent Bloomberg poll (not exactly a conservative organization) found that only 28% of Americans want the resettlement of Syrian “refugees” into the USA to happen sans a religious test, and 53% of Americans outright oppose any resettlement of Syrians into the USA, while 11% support letting in only Christian refugees and 8% are “unsure” of what they think.
Obama vows that his administration can “vet” all of these “widows and orphans” sufficiently to ensure that none of them decides to become a refujihadi once here, embedded in our communities. Well, what does he have to worry about? Obama and his family are protected to the hilt, courtesy of the U.S. taxpayers.
How many “widows and orphans” can Obama put up in his empty manse in Chicago? After all, charity begins at home:
And they feed, for the love of Allah, the poor, the orphan, and the captive … One who cares for widows and the poor is like those who fight in the way of Allah or those who spend their days fasting and their nights praying.
Charity? Or should we say sadaqah?
Here’s another poll for you, conducted on those Syrian “widows and orphans” who purport to be refugees from jihad and ISIS:
The poll shows thirteen percent of Syrian refugees have a completely positive opinion of ISIS with another ten percent having mixed feelings on the terror group, suggesting that nearly one quarter are open to recruitment by ISIS.
Factoring the survey results with the 10,000 Syrian refugees Obama plans to bring to the United States means Obama will bring in 1,300 ISIS supporters and a total of 3,100 who do not want the US to defeat ISIS.
The Obama administration imported about 1,600 Syrian refugees in the past fiscal year. That means around 200 Syrian refugee ISIS supporters and a total of nearly 500 Syrian refugee ISIS sympathizers are already in the country.
According to [a] … survey of [American] Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” …
Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”
A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
Got that? Those are the sentiments of Muslims who are ALREADY in our country. Is it wise (or delusional) to add to their numbers?
We have already reached a milestone in this country with the “first majority Muslim city council“, in Hamtramck, Michigan, where 60% of residents are Muslim. How long before the topic of shariah comes up in council meetings?
Michelle Malkin published a convincing argument against admitting any “refugees” into this country. She wrote,
I’ve reported for years on how immigration lawyers and tax-funded resettlement agencies run by left-wing religious and social justice groups have routinely gamed the system on behalf of asylum con artists. The racketeers coach applicants with phony stories and documents from “chop shops” and gamble their way through “refugee roulette.”
Along with everyday fraudsters, numerous jihad operatives—ranging from the Boston Marathon bomber brothers Tsarnaev to 1993 World Trade Center plotters Ramzi Yousef and the Blind Sheik to 1997 New York City bomb plotter Gazi Ibrahim Abu Mezer to CIA headquarters jihadist Mir Aimal Kansi to Ohio shopping mall bomb plotter Nuradin Abdi to ethnic Albanian Fort Dix jihad plotters Dritan, Shain and Eljvir Duka—have exploited our fraud-riddled asylum and refugee programs to plot and wage war on Americans.
Reminder: FBI agents admitted in 2013 that several dozen suspected terrorist bomb-builders may have mistakenly been allowed to move to the United States as Iraqi war refugees, including two al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI) jihadists who were resettled as refugees in Bowling Green, Ky. — and then later admitted in court that they had attacked U.S. soldiers in Iraq, according to ABC News. …
FBI Director James Comey acknowledged on Capitol Hill that “gaps” remained in the U.S.’s ability to screen refugees from Syria.
Alarmingly, the Gateway Pundit reports that
Honduran authorities have detained five Syrian nationals who were trying to reach the United States using stolen Greek passports …
[T]hey were planning to head to the border with neighboring Guatemala. The passports had been doctored to replace the photographs with those of the Syrians, police said.
From another story by the Gateway Pundit:
Serbian police reported Wednesday eight different migrants entered Europe this year using the same fake passport as one of the Paris suicide bombers.
Paris officials found this passport on the body of a dead ISIS suicide bomber Ahmad Almohammad.
The migrant passports had the same name, date of birth and place of birth as the Paris terrorist.
Only the photos were different.
So this begs the question: Exactly WHAT documents will the Obama administration use to “vet” these “refugees”? Given that Obama’s people admit that there is no database in Syria that can be queried, how will they sort out the jihadis from harmless widows and orphans? Is it even possible, when half of Muslims currently in the USA are okay with shariah law and 25% are okay with violent global jihad?
Obama’s people claim that they will use interviews, as if they haven’t a clue about the concepts of taqiyya and kitman, where devout Muslims can lie to infidels in order to subvert and defeat them. Do they actually believe that jihadis intent upon doing harm to the USA will tell the truth while trying to sneak their way into this country by pretending to be refugees?
Can we subcontract these interviews out to the Israelis? I’d trust their expertise tremendously more than I’d trust that of any Obama minion tasked with sorting out these “widows and orphans.”
Tell your governor and tell your members of Congress:
Just say NO! to all Middle-Eastern refugees.
And DEFUND the programs that bring them here.