Sexual Assault on Campus: Damned Lies and Statistics

Slu_clock_tower - Copy

As a wise Missourian once said,

Figures often beguile me, particularly when I have the arranging of them myself; in which case the remark attributed to Disraeli would often apply with justice and force:

“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”

Mark Twain’s commentary came to mind when I read the latest report about the number of “sexual assaults” on U.S. college campuses.

The damned lie, supported by bogus statistics, is that 1 in 4 U.S. college women are victims of “sexual assault” or “sexual misconduct”.

These terms are in quotes because this is how the researchers defined “sexual assault” for their survey:

[T]he AAU [Association of American Universities], mimicking other agenda-driven surveys, asked respondents questions such as whether they had experienced “forced kissing,” unwanted sexual “touching” (which could include attempted close dancing while fully clothed), “promised rewards” for sex, threats to “share damaging information about you” with friends, and the like. Then the AAU counted every “yes” answer as a sexual assault (or “misconduct”).

The article cited above provides numerous other problems with this well-reported but obviously “agenda-driven” survey.  Another article also delineates many problems with this deliberately flawed survey, but includes this statistic:

11 percent of female undergraduates said they were assaulted in a way that is consistent with criminal definitions of rape or sodomy. Half of these female undergrads said force was involved, while the other half maintained they were incapacitated by alcohol.

So regardless of whether or not politically biased “researchers” inflated their statistics for maximum effect, it still appears that nearly 5000 female students reported being victims of forcible rape or sodomy–criminal matters without a doubt. These women deserved protection and should have reported these crimes to the police as well as to university authorities.  One rape victim is one too many, but the progressive left is absolutely wrong to deliberately exaggerate the incidence of rape and other actual sexual assaults on college campuses.

Let’s look at a related issue–that being a rash of apparently false accusations of sexual assault made against young  men, perhaps as a direct result of exaggerating the incidence of sexual assault on campuses. Here’s one example:

In March 2014, after a night of partying, two St. Louis University students ended up in bed together at a house off-campus.

Two months later, the man got a letter from the university telling him he was under investigation for sexual assault.

The investigation carried on for months. During the inquiry, it was never disputed that the woman packed an overnight bag, willingly walked to the man’s house, got into his bed and had sex with him.

The pivotal question is whether the man knew the woman was too drunk to consent.

At first, the university officials ruled that the male student was guilty of sexual assault and at some point suspended him. The student appealed and the investigation continued. Eventually officials changed their minds and “cleared” the young man, but not before his schooling was unfairly disrupted.

The federal government issued “guidelines” telling universities and colleges how to go about such investigations, under the authority of Title IX, which is a 1972 law originally designed to ensure equity in the funding of college sports programs. The law also stresses

gender equity for boys and girls in every educational program that receives federal funding.

That Title IX is called a “living law” should be no surprise, since progressives never let a good law go to waste, if by regulation they can twist and turn and find new executive powers within the “penumbra” of the law.

Title IX has been used to create, in my opinion, a wholly unconstitutional prosecutorial system within universities that has a lower standard of proof and which can be used, and is used, to destroy the lives and careers of the accused, who must prove their innocence without the due process guaranteed by the Constitution. Consider:

When a student reports any type of sexual assault at the school’s Title IX office, the protocol is for schools to offer counseling and other resources. Additionally, schools are to advise students of their options to address the matter through the criminal justice system, the university’s administrative process or both.

Note that federal protocol is that the school should advise the alleged victims of their “options” to avail themselves of the criminal justice system. Advise is not the same as required “to address the matter through the criminal justice system.”

The accused, if neither the accuser nor the university informs the criminal justice system, may be denied the protections afforded by the criminal justice system–that is, the presumption of innocence, the right to legal counsel, the right to confront witnesses, the right of discovery, and the right to not be punished without due process, among other rights. The university administrative process outright favors the accuser. The accused is guilty and punished unless proven innocent.

Remember the child abuse scandal in the Catholic church? Whether the number of incidents of children abused by priests is exaggerated or not, as with the alleged number of college sexual assaults, one thing that was roundly criticized was how the Church handled investigations of the incidents in secret, meting out punishments and offering settlements behind closed doors, as if to hide the sorry facts from the public.

Even the UN got into the act when its “blistering” report on child sex abuse in the Catholic Church demanded that church authorities

remove all abusers from active ministry, report them to the police and open its archives on the 4,000 cases which have been referred to the Vatican.

There are laws regarding the mandatory reporting of child abuse across the country. Why no mandatory reporting of alleged sexual assaults on college campuses?

Most mandatory reporter laws aim to protect children, the elderly, the disabled.  Sure. Female students on college campuses are, for the most part, legal adults. So universities, unlike the Catholic Church, can evade their responsibility to society to report sexual crimes to the criminal justice system when they learn about them, because the victims are adults. The federal Title IX guidelines simply tell them to “advise” the victim of the right to seek justice in criminal court.

However, the Title IX system followed by universities serves to treat women as if they’re not adults. It’s a paternalistic system that infantilizes women or treats them as if, like some elderly or disabled, they can’t function as complete and rational human beings.

The male student at St. Louis University who was falsely accused of sexual assault had also been drinking and was possibly still intoxicated at the time he engaged in sex with a woman who may or may not have been intoxicated herself. She says she was.

Remember that initially the university found the young man responsible for sexual assault because the woman claimed to have been too drunk to knowingly consent to sex. (This despite witnesses who said that she did not appear to be drunk and the fact that she packed a bag at her apartment, while he waited, so that she could spend the night with this total stranger.)

In the university “justice” system, the woman was not held responsible, so long as she said that she was too drunk to know what she was doing.

On the other hand, the young man was held responsible for doing what he did, whether or not he was also too drunk to exercise control over his natural instincts.

Amazingly enough, he was also held responsible for somehow knowing that the woman he was about to have sex with was too drunk to legally consent, even though he may have been too drunk himself to know what he was doing, much less remember to get righteous “consent” (whatever that amounts to, after she packed a bag and walked a mile with him to his place) or to be able to accurately ascertain the mental and physical state of the woman!

One has to wonder, given witness descriptions of the woman’s behavior, why she wasn’t charged with taking advantage of the young man. Doesn’t sexual assault work both ways?

If the young man was also drunk, why was the young woman not charged with sexual assault against him? Did he give her his consent to engage in sex? You see the conundrum?

If women are under the influence, they’re not responsible for their actions. If men are under the influence, not only are they responsible for their own actions, but they’re also responsible for the actions of women with whom they associate and who may also be under the influence.

Are women autonomous human beings or are they not? Are they to be protected by society and the law as lesser human beings, unable to control themselves if intoxicated and therefore not held responsible if they get intoxicated and end up in bed with someone they barely know? Are women in control of their own bodies or not? How about their minds? How about their choices to partake in intoxicating substances, consequences be damned?

Once upon a time, there was no birth control and there was no culture of admiration for the likes of Miley Cyrus, with her twerking and her pansexualism, but things have changed. Women now have “gender equity” with males, especially with regard to sexual freedom.

Why, then, is the onus still on the male, if this is a society with true “gender equity”?

Are females precious little special snowflakes or are they the equal of men?

Every one of these incidents that are investigated by universities as sexual assaults should be reported to and turned over to the criminal justice system.

If the event can’t stand up to criminal investigation, then was there a “sexual assault” in the first place? If there was, then the cops will find out the truth.

Certainly, universities ought to be interested in creating a safe and pleasant environment for all of their students, including an environment where boorish behavior like dancing too close, or grabbing someone’s rear, or foisting unwelcome hugs and kisses upon another is investigated and punished, if necessary (if the woman hasn’t handled it herself already by a well-placed knee, a shout, or a slug in the chops, like we older women used to do).

However, boorish incidents should not be confused with sexual assault. All cases of alleged sexual assault must be reported to the local criminal authorities as soon as the university officials learn of them.

A recent editorial in the St. Louis media espoused rather alarming views, quoted in part below, with my objections in red:

Campus authorities are trying their best to develop a system that listens to both the accused and the accuser and proceeds accordingly. They are trying to create an environment outside of the criminal justice system that is fair to everyone involved but at the same time ensures a safe campus with no tolerance for sexual assault. [If it’s truly sexual assault, then the cops should be doing the investigation.]

Colleges do not have the authority to collect and store forensic evidence nor the subpoena powers available to police and the courts. [That’s why the cops should do these investigations, especially to preserve evidence and get witnesses under oath to protect the rights of the accused.] Some schools are telling students that they have to get affirmative consent, consciously and voluntarily given, before a sexual encounter. That may be a good idea but the chances of that happening in a significant number of cases is probably not high. …

Some young men will get caught in the undertow. The accused at SLU may be one such case. [He was cleared and, besides, he’s innocent until proven guilty, which he was not. Thank goodness they don’t know or reveal his identity.] He was suspended by the university for a year [quite unfairly] as he was preparing to graduate, Mr. Addo reported. Then the university reversed itself and cleared him of blame. After his case was resolved he moved from St. Louis to Kansas City to work with a relative and is now beginning to apply to graduate schools.

This is more than a year later than he had expected to be making those applications. That is unfortunate but it is good that he is getting on with his life.

It’s “unfortunate” that he lost a year of his life and was falsely accused and unfairly punished by the university for a crime he did not commit! I wonder if the university refunded his tuition?

What if this innocent young man were that writer’s son? Would he or she be so flip about the injustice the young man suffered?

Why are universities seeking to set up a parallel system outside the criminal justice system? There’s a reason why there are constitutional protections for the accused in the USA. Innocent until proven guilty.

We already have, with this president, the accumulation of executive power far beyond what was intended by the law and the  Constitution, including his many executive “actions”, his many decisions to simply not enforce various laws, and his creation of czars who function without any accountability to the people or their representatives. Do we really need an environment outside the criminal justice system in which to adjudicate alleged sexual “assaults” on college campuses?

No. What we need is for the universities to act just as the UN and most progressives in the USA expect the Catholic Church to act. Report every allegation to the police.

Then we will have truth and not lying statistics.  Females will be held as responsible for their behavior as are males. Males will not be held responsible for the behavior of females, nor will they be expected to be preternatural mind readers.

#####

Advertisements

146 responses to “Sexual Assault on Campus: Damned Lies and Statistics

  1. I’d LOVE … 2 YANK …. more than a STORY … what JOKERS!!!
    more accidents ??? … go BACK 2 BED JOE! REALLY NOW

    http://mediaequalizer.com/brian-maloney/2015/10/wapo-accidently-publishes-biden-story-abruptly-yanks

    • Okay, as when somebody famous is nearing the end, I can understand journalists getting a head start on an obituary, but where the hell would THIS part have come from?

      “His inner circle of advisers helped him make the decision without the benefit of any of their own polling, focus groups or other standard practices of modern campaigns.”

      Well, I suppose it’s a given but do they just MAKE THINGS UP?

      “His advisers think he has the right biography to navigate the current political environment, particularly as a contrast to Clinton.”

      Do they now? And how does this writer know this, in light of Joe deciding to run? NOT!

      His biography? I’ll have to start assembling my hit piece on Joe the plagiarist. What’s worse, having a ghost-written bogus biography or just stealing one?

  2. ~ kernel32.dll • 6 min
    Thursday is key.
    If Hillary lies under oath, Biden is in.
    If Hillary does not lie under oath, Biden is out.

    ~ MJD kernel32.dll • 5 min
    Well, that settles it. She will lie under oath.
    BIDEN IS IN!

    ~ Clivus Multrum MJD • 3 min
    I expect a whole bunch of “I don’t recalls” from Madam, but that will be
    just as bad for her.

    ~ MJD Clivus Multrum • 2 min
    America is going to get a gut full of her lies. Just a matter of time
    before she pulls out of the race.

    ~ JRjr • 9 min
    Joe is just waiting for the FBI – Justice Dept indictment of Hitlery.

    SO this IS NOW ….the UNITED STATES OF BULL SHIT country!
    24 /7 …..
    THIS is NOT FUNNY CUTE or should be tolerated …EVER

    • Did you notice the meme promoted in the media lately, that Hillary basically did us all a favor by using her personal email (everybody was doing it!) because “cybersecurity” was so lax in HER STATE DEPT. (they leave out the blame factor) that it was safer to use personal email to allegedly protect our country’s secrets? (Besides, the American people are tired of hearing about her emails, as Bernie helpfully opined.) As with Obama, the media FORGET that “the buck stops” on Barry’s and Hillary’s desks because they’re the ones calling the shots. Somehow, DemoncRATS aren’t expected to have any responsibility for anything!

  3. Canada went lefty last night.
    Good thing they don’t have a horde of islamic fighters clamoring to get in!
    yet.
    I predict no Hillary in 2016.
    Either because she will be indicted or because there won’t be an election.

    • “The Rainbow Gravity theory suggests that gravity’s effect on the cosmos causes different wavelengths of light to behave differently. This means that particles with different energies will move in space-times and gravitational fields differently. The theory was proposed 10 years ago in an attempt to reconcile difference between the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics. One consequence of rainbow gravity is that our universe stretches back into time infinitely with no singular point where it started.

      So now the scientists understand that the Creator always was, is, and always will be? Amazing the scientific wisdom in the Bible as it was revealed. Consider their theory that there are multiple co-existing universes.

      “In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.”

      So IS religion separate from science? Is the only “rational” way to exist as an ATHEIST?

      The Lord works in mysterious ways. Atheist scientists will end up validating the Word of God.

      • Yeah , but rainbow gravity theory proposes a parallel universe….into black holes ….but we are part of that parallel universe(perhaps other living intities, but our particles of existence , so they say, are part of that universe. I don’t have time to visit or to spend learning of that other universe, at least not in this life….I barely can master this one I’m existing in now. Maybe that’s where all the gays go when they leave this universe….rainbow….get it, get it? I’m just messing with you Miri, but I like your take ____”my father’s house has many mansions”. I will get there maybe one day, but right now, my incredible universe must be the one I am suppose to exist in, except for those days when I’m just “out of it”.

        • Ha, ha! That’s good. Deceased gays go to the rainbow alternate universe. I hope we all get to another mansion one uncloudy day and that we can meet there, in the land of uncloudy skies.

  4. One of the enduring messages of this year is that there is going to be a Great Economic Crash That Will Destroy The Dollar and Destroy The Usa.
    I put in the search phrase, (No, not to Google), The Great predicted US Dollar crash, and I got a number of hits.
    These “hits” were all from what one might decribe as fringe websites.
    There could be two explanations: The people who see this coming have been marginalized “to the fringe” by the evil mainstream bankers, illuminati, NWO people, etc, or only a few fringey people believe it.
    Which is it?
    For Sure, the October Surprise of 2008, as an orchestrated attack on the USA banking system, withdrawing close to $1000 Billion in a few hours, to basically destroy the Republican incumbency and get Barack Obama elected.
    Well, it happened once so could it happen again? I guess so has to be the only obvious answer.
    So what happens if foreign enemy agents demand to withdraw the entire US debt of 20,000 Billion Dollars in a single day?
    Well, once you own the printing presses, you can just print up 20,000 Billion Dollars and say there ya go squire, you are paid off. Mind the roads.
    There could be repercushions, sure, but you can obliterate the crisis in a single electronic day.
    My point is that the crisis is only a crisis if you want it to be,
    We have all heard lots of predictions how some false flag will cause the cancellation of the 2016 elections and justify the many DHS internment centers that now seem to exist.
    The next financial attack by the NWO does not, in my opinion, rise to the level of justification.
    It can be shut down in one electronic day, or it could be used to justify the enslavement of Americans.
    We don’t have to go along with the screenplay.
    Just Sayin’

    • nice take on that DaVE ! You’re right , the screen play, but exactly how we’re going to counteract that screenplay needs expounding on.
      There’s so much out there with tons of predictions and staying keen on whats real and what’s clearly happening is hard to discern sometimes. It’s certainly not a left right or republican/dem paradigm either.

  5. Autarky!
    What the heck is that??
    It’s like when that obama guy said have you seen the price of Arugula down at the supermarket?
    What?
    I read this article in the British Daily Telegraph, it was a financial type article,
    “Russia Turns Back to Autarky”
    I looked it up.
    Merriam-Webster defines Autarky as a philosophy of self reliance, you depend entirely on your own resources.
    Why couldn’t the Telegraph have just said that?
    Dinner party showing off for London elite, I guess,
    but anyways,
    we would be far better at self-reliance than just about any other country
    on Earth – in relation to my last post.
    We just need a decent government.

    • So as we turn commie, they turn to the American Way?

    • What if Bernie Sanders’ run was a scam all along ( no one could believe such a blatant socialist could garner so much steam) and he knew he wouldn’t get far, and it was all a scam to keep the fires burning for socialist causes till Hillary got out from under the fire of the public….then Biden steps aside for sure, Bernie gets the boot and Hillary builds an electorate empire from all sides and SHE’s a shu-in for the Damacrats. Now Hillary can be anything she wants to be at any given moment, and her constituents will rally around a WOmAN for pres.

      • I think all these people running is a scam to give us the continuing ILLUSION that we really have a choice and that our vote would matter, if we even COULD vote for the person of OUR choice, which we won’t be given a chance to do. As usual, it will be the lesser of two evils and probably, in this case, they will truly BOTH be evils. What the hell is up with TRUMP encouraging Webb to run as an independent? Who do you think Webb would be more likely to take votes from: Hillary, Jeb, or Trump? Maybe they’re all there to rope a dope (with We the People as the dopes) to pave the way for Jebary (or maybe it’s Hillabush). Vive NO difference.

      • I think we need to POST ….one as “DOWN on THE HILL” !!!
        the lies & all strikes against.. the HAG-BAG …full of HER OWN
        “HOT AIR” …. & JUST WHY …she needs 2 GO! …really I DO!!!!

        • God always finds me… so here we go…. ha’
          DEAR MRS. CLINTON ……. @mychal-massie.com ….. by Roseann Salanitri

          ~ Ted October 21, 2015 at 9:16 am #

          Another great piece and let’s not forget we forget what has happened to many “friends” of the vile Clintons.

          1- James McDougal – Clinton’s convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.

          2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.

          3 – Vince Foster – Former White House counselor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.

          4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the air Traffic controller committed suicide.

          5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.

          6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.

          7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.

          8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.

          9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas

          10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.

          11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.

          12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancée of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancée, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancée.

          13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.

          14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.

          15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.

          16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.

          17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.

          18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.

          19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.

          20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.

          21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.

          22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.

          23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.

          24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.

          25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.

          26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.

          27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

          THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES – HENRY CASE:

          28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.
          29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
          30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
          31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
          3 2 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.
          33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
          34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

          THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD:

          36 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.
          37 – Captain Scott J. Reynolds
          38 – Sgt. Brian Hanley
          39 – Sgt. Tim Sabel
          40 – Major General William Robertson
          41 – Col. William Densberger
          42 – Col. Robert Kelly
          43 – Spec. Gary Rhodes
          44 – Steve Willis
          45 – Robert Williams
          46 – Conway LeBleu
          47 – Todd McKeehan

          And sadly the latest four:

          1. J. Christopher Stephens, U.S. Ambassador, Killed in Benghazi
          2. Glen Doherty, U.S. Navy Seal, Killed in Benghazi
          3. Sean Smith, U.S. Foreign Service, Killed in Benghazi
          4. Tyrone Woods, U.S. Navy Seal, Killed in Benghazi

  6. Repercushions! On Sale Now!
    At Discount Furniture Showrooms,
    you can have them in time for Christmas.

  7. Biden’s out and he says ” unfortunately, I believe we’re out of time ” to run…..so why did he wait?????? I’m thinking this is a clue to Thursday’s outcome with Hillary and her debut with her hearing. What do you think???? Is the verdict in?/???? is she not going DOWn and they know it????? Has O. decided to yank the rug out from under the FBI’s legit investigation….because he himself has much to answer to; surely he’s to really blame for much of Bengazi………

    • I know. I caught that “unfortunately,” too. Did you notice Barry literally standing over him as he made his non-announcement, as if to make sure Joe wouldn’t leave the reservation, so to speak? What’s up with that WaPo story yesterday that said he was throwing his hat in the ring and then poof?! They disappeared it asap. The way things have been going these past 7-8 years, I expect that the fix is in for Hillary and evidence of how it’s going to turn out. Screws turned. Secrets threatened to be revealed or indictments threatened. You know. The usual Clinton/Obama game. I believe you’re spot on, alfy. Verdict over. If we’re wrong, I’ll be happy, but don’t expect I’ll be happy. Do you?

  8. HERE 2 STAY ….. YEP, LOVING IT!!! the DONALD ROCKS our
    W O R L D ….. BIG T I M E !!! BRING IT ON!

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-experienced-major-shift-153453944.html

  9. 8:13pm WORLD … the above will not allow story … ^^^
    Biden will not run for White House
    Announcement with Obama by his side ends months of speculation

    XXX Edward Luce Biden’s exit comes with “sting for Clinton” !!!!

    Jeb Bush financial juggernaut slows
    Clinton and Sanders clash on policy

  10. ~ jafo • ….^^^
    I say put someone in who will really TICK them all OFF – Sarah Palin.

    ~ tayKy jafo •
    Palin would be excellent Hillary would stroke out & 0bama would

    B seeking asylum in Kenya after HE starts civil unrest. ..ha

  11. Wherein Ann Makes Hilary White Cry.

    The editor and driving force behind WhatIsUpWithTheSynod.com , Hilary White, another “tough gal” like me, messaged me to say that my latest piece for publication over there made her cry.

    But don’t tell.

    HERE IT IS.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized on October 21, ARSH 2015.

  12. YOUR WISH …is our …. ha’ ~ GO TRUMP smash HER like the
    COCK – ROACH ….SHE is & always has BEEN …. just GREEDY!

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/21/trump-biden-made-correct-decision-bring-on-hillarys-terrible-record/

  13. Donald J. Trump …….. ^^^
    ✔ @realDonaldTrump

    I think Joe Biden made correct decision for him & his family. Personally, I would rather run against Hillary because her record is so bad.
    10:24 AM – 21 Oct 2015

  14. O’ ..TICK TICK .. again ..suckers every where WTPOTUS ….LOOK!!!

    So Barack Obama, Sergey Brin, Mark Zuckerberg, and all you other lefties, be aware that Clock Boy is not interested in freedom or tolerance or equality. He is throwing his lot in with a repressive sharia-based regime. You’ve been had.

  15. WE B S I S T E R S ….. GO STUMP the TRUMP!!! …LOVE IT!

    https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Trump2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s