Environmental Migrants and Fundamental Transformation

atmosphere - Copy

Nowadays, everything is political and everything is tainted with politics. Nothing much that happens these days is an accident or a coincidence.

A previous post explained how many fields of scientific study are being systematically corrupted by political correctness, which infects anthropology, paleontology, psychology, sociology, archaeology, history, meteorology and of course political science, among others. The issue of man-caused climate change is among the most obvious of examples where political correctness rears its ugly head. Why is this important to recognize?

Let’s speculate a little about how politically corrupted science can further efforts to “fundamentally transform” our free Republic.

First, here’s a crash course on Agenda 21, which is a United Nations plan to ensure “sustainable development” throughout the world (superseded by Agenda 2030 in late 2015). [emphasis added to quotes]

Agenda 21 is a 300-page document divided into 40 chapters that have been grouped into 4 sections:

Section I: Social and Economic Dimensions is directed toward combating poverty, especially in developing countries, changing consumption patterns, promoting health, achieving a more sustainable population, and … [integrating environment and development] in decision making.

Section II: Conservation and Management of Resources for Development Includes atmospheric protection, combating deforestation, protecting fragile environments, conservation of biological diversity (biodiversity), control of pollution and the management of biotechnology, and radioactive wastes.

Section III: Strengthening the Role of Major Groups includes the roles of children and youth, women, NGOs, local authorities, business and industry, and workers; and strengthening the role of indigenous peoples, their communities, and farmers.

Section IV: Means of Implementation: implementation includes science, technology transfer, education, international institutions and financial mechanisms.

That summary touches upon a few of the many worrisome topics that have made Agenda 21 so controversial: sustainable development, global action, how to change consumption patterns, how to create a more sustainable population (in other words, how to reduce it), atmospheric protection and pollution control, deforestation, fragile environments, the rights of children and “indigenous” peoples, and financial mechanisms (to redistribute wealth).

An imposed global agenda is incompatible with our Constitutional Republic, which is unique among nations. We the People of the United States of America are a free people, with our freedom enshrined in our Constitution, which protects our inalienable, God-given rights. The USA has a government of the People, by the People, and for the People. We will never be part of any “global government”, unless every other nation on Earth wishes to join as States in our Union, provided that We the People of the USA agree to let them in.

The items on this UN agenda can only be implemented by mandate, force, or subterfuge, despite the specious claim that Agenda 21 is “voluntary and non-binding.” The people of the USA are unlikely to support or vote for implementation of most of Agenda 21.

A website called Democrats Against U.N. Agenda 21 interprets the agenda as follows:

UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. …

In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners.  It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control.  Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body.  Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.  Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.

U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more, a redistribution of wealth.  Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world.  Only then, they say, will there be social justice which is a cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan.

So conservatives are not alone in their concern about this “global” scheme.

The myth of man-caused global warming is a means to an end, with the end being the imposition of Agenda 21 on the people of the United States. This plan to impose Agenda 21 upon the free people of the USA via the global warming myth is exactly why it had to become politically incorrect for anyone to reject the proposition that humans, in particular the citizens of the USA, are to blame for climate change and owe its victims climate justice.

If some other explanation for a changing climate is allowed to gain traction (such as sunspots; or the tilt of the Earth’s axis; or movement of the magnetic poles; or the expected natural variation in climate over millennia, with wide swings sometimes evident over just a few centuries), then there is no ready excuse to redistribute (aka steal) the wealth of the USA. Without a “crime” to pin on the United States, then the “global community” can’t force U.S. citizens to pay reparations and, at the same time, cut the USA down to size.

To succeed with this agenda, any studies that refute the notion that human activity is mostly responsible for an ever-changing climate must be suppressed, ridiculed, or prevented from being published, if possible. Those who do not follow the program must be purged. Anyone who doesn’t ascribe to the politically correct mindset with regard to global warming is ridiculed as a “climate denier”. This is necessary for the scheme to work. Global warming extortionists plan to use U.S. tort law and “international law” against us when demanding compensation for wholly natural events:

“Loss and damage” entails claims by the developing world from rich countries to provide compensation for the “losses and irreversible damage, including non-economic losses” … associated with climate change. The idea is taken directly from tort law, which is probably why North America, Europe and Australia have been virulently opposed to having a separate track discuss the issue. Part of the problem is that the notion of loss and damage might also include non-monetary forms of compensation, whose character might sometimes be unclear. For instance, if small island nations like the Maldives and Kiribati were to become submerged as a result of sea level rise from climate change, the resulting disappearance of these nation states would require unusual measures of recompense, including mass migration to other countries and citizenship rights for the migrants, rather than just money.

In cases of civil negligence, in the U.S., but also elsewhere, courts have long established that where a proximate cause to a loss can be established, whether the action was intentional or not, the perpetrator will bear the liability and will have to pay for damages. This means that if enshrined in international law, the countries most responsible for historically caused losses associated with climate change will have to provide the most compensation for various identified damages that will mostly be in developing countries.

Got that? We and other Western and/or “rich” nations may owe not only money but also citizenship in our countries to these “refugees”. It’s interesting that other countries that pour carbon dioxide into the atmosphere in large quantities (China, e.g.) seem to be exempt from this scheme of “recompense.” Note also the race of the inhabitants, for the most part, of those countries targeted to pay climate reparations.

We already see how the media will blame nearly every natural event on global warming. Even some non-natural events are blamed, by specious extension, on global warming. Algal bloom in Lake Erie? Global warming. Sewers overflow in Chicago? Global warming. Sinkhole in Siberia? Global warming. Fewer polar bears (except there aren’t)? Global warming. Flash flood in Detroit? Global warming. Shark attacks? Global warming. More tornadoes or weaker tornadoes? Global warming. More rain? Global warming. Drought? Global warming. Earthquakes? Global warming. Tsunami? Global warming. Landslide? Global warming. Volcano? Global warming. War? Global warming. Unusually cold summer? Global warming!

I could spend all day finding more examples.

Suffice it to say that the globalists have hit upon a very clever scheme to impose their dreamed-of world-wide collective on everyone (ruled by themselves, of course):

Whatever happens blame it on global warming. If the sun shines, it’s global warming. If the sun doesn’t shine, it’s global warming. And whatever you do, brook no dissent.

Once the free nations and the wealthy nations (wealthy because they’re free) are sufficiently indicted as responsible for all misfortune, natural disasters, and adverse events, then we can “move forward” with fundamentally transforming their countries and redistributing their wealth.

The current “humanitarian crisis” on the USA’s southern border, where 57,000 “unaccompanied alien children” have flooded into the country this year alone, is just the tip of a frightening iceberg.

Too many people with a political agenda want to define these “children” as refugees. Why might that be?

Could it be that they’re setting the stage for the next influx of “refugees” into the USA? Could it also be that they’re creating a precedent for the redefinition of the term refugee, so that current international law will instantaneously apply to climate “refugees”, too?

Yes, the next wave of refugees might be climate refugees (aka environmental refugees, climate migrants, environmental migrants, climate exiles, climate-change exiles. Again with the morphing terminology, a tell-tale sign of the politicization of a topic.)

If everything adverse is caused by global warming, then anybody who wants to migrate to the USA can become a climate refugee!

Under the global climate change meme (and Agenda 21), the USA, among other nations, will be expected by the UN and the “global community” to accept all of the environmental refugees because the global warming myth blames climate change on these developed countries. To succeed, they must first redefine the term refugee.

The ability to seek asylum is an inalienable human right. In theory, any individual has the capacity to flee political, economic, social or religious persecution and endeavour to make a better life for themselves in another state. Furthermore, with the impacts of climate change set to displace millions of the world’s population, a solid and humane refugee policy needs to be at the forefront of every nation’s agenda.

However, at this stage, citizens that are displaced due to environmental factors are not considered to be true refugees under the 1951 Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

Traditionally, a refugee is defined as someone who is ‘…unable or unwilling to return to their country of origin owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion’ (UNHCR, Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951, p. 3).

Yet, this does not include people who are displaced from their homeland due to environmental factors such as sea level rise, extreme drought and a lack of crop yields. Across the globe, millions of people are currently at risk of displacement due to changes in the climate that will leave much of the Earth’s land mass uninhabitable.

The argument goes that nations must, therefore, fix this problem with labeling: Nations need to change the definition of “refugee” to include anyone (allegedly) displaced by climate change. This proposal reiterates the argument cited above:

The Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) has argued that the people who will be forced to move due to climate change currently have no adequate recognition in international law. The EJF contends that a new multilateral legal instrument is required to specifically address the needs of ‘climate refugees’ in order to confer protection to those fleeing environmental degradation and climate change. They have also asserted that additional funding is needed to enable developing countries to adapt to climate change. Sujatha Byravan and Sudhir Chella Rajan have argued for the use of the term ‘climate exiles’ and for international agreements to provide them political and legal rights, including citizenship in other countries, bearing in mind those countries’ responsibilities and capabilities.

They’re referring to the United States here, too. If you doubt that, then here’s proof:

How many should go where? Under our formula, the top cumulative emitter, the United States, would absorb 21 percent of the climate-change exiles a year; the smallest of the 20 major emitters, Venezuela, would absorb less than 1 percent. If such a program were to start in 2010, the United States, for example, would have to be prepared to accept 150,000 to a half-million immigrants a year for the next 70 years …

Got that? These guys expect the USA to accept 10.5 to 35 million new “citizens” into the country over the next 70 years. (It’s only fair!) Keep in mind that a huge proportion of these people would be coming from countries that are autocratic, communist, Marxist, impoverished, undereducated, and/or Muslim-majority countries. Another report, however, proposes a far greater number of climate refugees:

However, it is projected that between 25 Million and 700 Million people will become ‘climate refuges’ [sic] as the planet continues to experience the impacts of a warming climate.

Consider: If the USA is required to take in 21% of the expected climate exiles, accepting the worst case scenario cited above (700 million displaced), then the total number of new U.S. citizens will be 147 million. The current population of the USA is an estimated 318,651,000, so these people are proposing that the USA accept nearly a 50% increase in the U.S. population as partial payment for its crime of causing global warming!

How will such an influx of instant citizens change the demographics, culture, debt, and economy, indeed the very system of government, of our free Republic? I’m not alone in asking that question or worrying about the answer:

As President Barack Obama considers sidestepping Congress to loosen U.S. immigration policy, a Reuters/Ipsos poll shows Americans are deeply worried that illegal immigration is threatening the nation’s culture and economy.

Seventy percent of Americans – including 86 percent of Republicans – believe undocumented immigrants threaten traditional U.S. beliefs and customs, according to the poll. …

Despite arguments from the White House and groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce that legal immigration benefits business, 63 percent of people in the online survey also said immigrants place a burden on the economy. …

45 percent of people in the poll, carried out between July 15-22, who said the number of immigrants legally allowed to enter the country should be reduced.

Only 17 percent thought more legal immigrants should be allowed to come to the United States. …

At the same time, a new study says that what We the People want has little to no effect on policy in these United States. Small wonder that the powers that be dislike the Tea Party, especially when

“fundamental transformation” is so within their grasp!

Why else is the Obama administration building a huge refugee infrastructure that will itself become sustainable so long as it has a continuing influx of “refugees” and taxpayer money, if not to “prepare” us for climate refugees?

Kevin Dinnin is the CEO of [an alleged] faith-based, nonprofit organization called BCFS, formerly known as Baptist Child and Family Services. This obscure charity has emerged as one of the biggest players in the federal government’s response to the influx of more than 57,000 unaccompanied children who have trudged across the southern border so far this year. It runs two of the largest facilities for temporarily housing immigrant children, as well as six permanent shelters in California and Texas. Since December, BCFS has received more than $280 million in federal grants to operate these shelters, according to government records. … 

BCFS is just one part of a sprawling system of shelters for unaccompanied children across the country. As the numbers of children entering the country balloon, so do the dollars required to care for them. [h/t Leza]

Why else does the Obama administration use a 2008 law intended to protect children from sex trafficking and slavery in order to admit into this country children who do not qualify for the special treatment accorded by that law? In most cases, these “children” are accompanied by a parent (coming in as families) or they are eventually released to a parent within the U.S. already (and in many cases here illegally as well). Therefore, these children do not qualify to stay under the 2008 law and should not be accorded hearings but instead should be immediately returned to their home countries, as are Mexicans and Canadians. Obama chose to misapply this law, despite the clear definition of unaccompanied minor, via a policy change. He is not following the letter or spirit of the law. Why not? To get that refugee infrastructure built? To get the organizations that will benefit fully incorporated, with mouths eager to latch onto the spigot of taxpayer money? To get the jobs filled and the unions who will represent the employees organized? To make this refugee bureaucracy a self-perpetuating system for at least the next 70 years?

Why else does the Obama administration want to create a ridiculous “pilot program” wherein U.S. government employees travel to the “donor” countries (such as Honduras) to screen “children” in situ for entry into the U.S., presumably as refugees? Setting a precedent, creating a behemoth of a refugee infrastructure, and preparing these new refugees for citizenship are the answers to that question!

If individuals are labeled as refugees in their home countries and then enter the USA as refugees, they can more easily and quickly become eligible for citizenship than can legal immigrants who enter under the usual path.

Even if the outstandingly ridiculous proposal by Sujatha Byravan and Sudhir Chella Rajan to pay off environmental refugees with immediate U.S. citizenship does not come to pass, current law with regard to refugees states:

If you were granted refugee status while in another country, and then entered the U.S. as a refugee, you can count your date of U.S. entry as the beginning of your permanent residence – assuming, of course, that you eventually succeed in becoming a permanent resident. All your years as a refugee in the U.S. will count toward the required five years of permanent residence for naturalization eligibility purposes. …

If you were granted asylum in the United States, a maximum of one year of your time in asylee status counts as permanent residence. If you waited longer than a year to apply for your green card, that extra time will not do you any good – you will still need to wait another four years after your green card approval before applying for U.S. citizenship.

So, it seems better to be a refugee than a legal immigrant or an asylee. While the parents may have to wait a long time for amnesty, at least their children may get to come in, be labeled refugees, and get a faster track to citizenship. Anchor babies and anchor refugees. Whatever works! Nudge, nudge, nudge. Incrementalism. Little by little.

These enemies of our way of life seek to redistribute our wealth to other nations. But they also seek to redistribute to our nation the poor of other countries and, by awarding them instant citizenship, to fundamentally transform us into a nation that has far fewer freedoms and that functions more like a socialistic oligarchy under global governance. In other words, they believe that they’ve found a way to destroy us from within.

Political correctness is one way that this global conspiracy to “fundamentally transform” capitalistic,  free nations moves forward. Another way it moves forward is through the myth of global climate change–change that they allege was caused by those same developed, free, democratic nations. These nations must be blamed for all misfortune that happens in the underdeveloped world, and then they must be made to pay.

This is a war being waged against a few nations by the larger “community” of nations known as the UN. But the main target, make no mistake, is the USA. It’s a broad and clever conspiracy: Academia, science, politics, government, media, entertainment, law–virtually every realm of our society–has been infiltrated and corrupted.

We the People of the United States have a lot of catching up to do if we hope to stop the fundamental transformation of our free Republic.

We begin by recognizing what we’re up against. 


Postscript for anthropogenic global warming true believers:  A mere 20,000 years ago, the land where Chicago is now situated was covered by a sheet of ice a mile thick. A MILE-thick sheet of ice. That ice melted and was well on its way to being gone by 14,000 years ago. There were no SUVs or factories then. Who or what caused the ice to melt?

144 responses to “Environmental Migrants and Fundamental Transformation

  1. You would think that you’ve seen everything by now and you might think that nobody could possible make this up, but it’s apparently true: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/08/teacher-suspended-for-having-students-reenact-mike-brown-ferguson-shooting/

    “… A teacher at an Alabama middle school has reportedly been suspended after children in her class were made to act out the police shooting of Ferguson, Mo., teenager Michael Brown. [I wonder whose version of the shooting was accepted as truth?]

    The “absurd” classroom activity was revealed by the mother of one of the students allegedly via a Facebook post, which detailed how the teacher chose a white child to play the role of Ferguson Officer Darren Wilson and a black child to act out the role of Mike Brown, with the teacher having students research where and how many times he was shot. …

    [A parent wrote:] ‘The white students had to play the police officer. She even has them get on the internet and research how many times the young man was shot where he was shot at. That is absurd to me then you turn around and make them reenact every bit of it including the shooting…Then sit in class and tells them our black children can not walk in their own neighborhood without white people shooting them and she hated to sound racist but whatever…. Sounds like someone’s racist to me, and to me they are teaching these children to hate one another when we’re supposed to be teaching them to love one another…'”

    Think of another way this is absurd. Children have been getting suspended from school for drawing pictures of guns, chewing their Pop-Tarts in the shape of guns, or POINTING THEIR FINGERS AND PRETENDING TO SHOOT SOMEONE! Now we have teachers SEGREGATING children by race and forcing some of them to play shooters and others to play (no doubt) “innocent” victims based upon race.

    This is CHILD ABUSE and should be labeled and investigated as a hate crime against the white children.

    At the same time, we’re reading story after story in the media about how traumatized the school children are and how careful parents and teachers have to be to deal with their potentil PTSD. This teacher is reinforcing the trauma. What a passive/aggressive jerk.

    • btw, despite the fact that their fellow media outlet had to apologize for featuring the officer’s house on TV, the St. Louis newspaper has now “doxed” the officer and published information that will put other members of his family in danger as well as opening up the cemetery where his mother is buried to vandalism. Way to go, St. Louis Post-Dispatch: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/little-trail-of-police-officer-wilson/article_6dc02633-19c6-5fef-8b34-f2e8237ab13f.html

      They may give a half-assed apology, but only AFTER the damage is done. Surely they discussed this thoroughly and decided to publish it anyway. How’s about they do a little research on the grandstanding family now? They can start here: https://www.courts.mo.gov/casenet/base/welcome.do

      since they SOMEHOW feel that the 12-year-deceased mother’s rap sheet is relevant, then so should be the entire sorry history of the alleged victim’s family. It seems only fair to me that the paper should PUBLISH the backgrounds of all the players, seeing as how they consider the number of times his mother married to be pertinent to the story.

      btw, please don’t publish the information on that family here. I don’t want anybody to make the mistake of confusing common names, as these people seem to have multiple surnames and many of them are common (as are their first names, too). I gave the link for your own edification, if you’re curious. In fact, their lawyer Crump telegraphed the probability when he complained, in advance, that “they” will now try to assassinate the mother’s character. Maybe that’s why they assassinated Wilson’s dead mother’s character. Preemptive strike? The deceased woman is not a player in this because, obviously, she can’t be. Brown’s family, however, is everywhere. Even meeting with the BIASED U.S. Attorney General Holder. (Self-admittedly biased, as he talked yesterday about how he himself had PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH “THIS”–meaning racial profiling, which has NOTHING to do with this case.)

      So Ms. McSpadden and Mr. Brown Sr. and Mr. Head, all being involved in inciting this “investigation” of non-existent civil rights allegations that We the People will probably be forced to pay reparations for? Well, why shouldn’t they be the subjects of prying eyes, too? How about the media NOW go investigate Mr. Brown’s background and family? How about proof that he was enrolled in Vatterott college and ready to attend last week? Why was he living with grandma and not his parents? He was sleeping on her couch. It’s known to be a problem in those school districts that kids are sent to couch surf at grandma’s so they can enroll in a “better” school district, where their parents aren’t paying taxes to support the local schools. Is that what was going on? Or is the rumor of domestic violence at home true? It’s pertinent, imho, especially if it goes to some anger management problems that maybe he had or learned at home. What effect did his very broken home have on his mental state? Since it’s important to know Officer Wilson’s deceased mother’s husbands’ names, then surely it’s more important to know about all the factors that led Michael Brown to perpetrate a strong-arm robbery and assault a police officer the day he was shot. Right? Was he known to drink when he wasn’t old enough to drink? Did he smoke blunts? Any connection to someone who dealt marijuana who may have been a source for him of the pot he planned to repack those cigarillos with? How about the paper publishing the inspiring rap songs he wrote, extolling the joys of weed and his misogyny?

      • Desuirea Harris said HER Grand-Son had recently graduated
        high school and was looking forward to the future, including … “POSSIBLY”…… attending college. not 4 SURE….O’

        @Foxnews & @AP news

        “My grandson never even GOT into A Fight,” she said. “He was just
        looking forward to getting on with his life. He was ON his WAY.”

        • A prediction: Look to see the witnesses SUDDENLY say that Wilson used a racial epithet. Johnson would be a good one to embellish his “get the eff on the sidewalk” with an n-word. Because you know why? Unless they can prove some kind of obvious racial animus in Wilson’s actions, there’s NO civil rights violation. It’s like with the OJ trial and the allegation that the cop used the n-word in a SCREENPLAY he was writing and that was that. So they need that animus and they WILL find it, even if they have to have someone invent it.


    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php? fbid=697854416968843&set=p.697854416968843&type=1&theater

  3. just ANOTHER long legged PIMP DADDY.. as tax-FREE wads R
    dropped in that HAT’ .. 4 sure some-thing 2 keep preach-in’ bout!
    Money 2 burn thru.. I get it man $… peeled off them lbs. 2 re-new
    his get-up & go 4 IT! … or so HE thinks ..


  4. Michael Brown.. & as drkates also says… no birth data for this boy?
    Very weird NOTHING??? …. can any of us find it? …


    • You know, I looked up a few of the family members on the people search engines but found no association of them with Michael Brown. I don’t know how the heck you go about finding birth data for him, though. Births aren’t publicly reported anymore, so far as I know. I mean, if the family announces it, they are. But I think the days of published “vital statistics” in the paper of record are long gone.

  5. We Help ~ ‘David FIGHT Goliath’ …. we FIGHT 4 what is RIGHT…
    what is FAIR…. & 4 JUSTICE … OK, time will TELL … will see


  6. QL ….. @ drkates
    August 21, 2014 at 12:55 am
    Is Ferguson a test run? A false flag geared for no other purpose than to implement martial law, not only in Ferguson, Missouri, where 18 year-old Michael Brown was shot and killed by police, sparking riots and the rollout of militarized police, National Guard, and the crackdown and arrest of peaceful protesters, journalists and violent offenders alike, but to inflame other states in order to declare martial law around the country?


    • Anything is possible these days. There WAS that curious post Brown placed on Facebook saying something to the effect: If I leave this earth today, at least I know I helped people. Then there was the second police-involved shooting in St. Louis just a few days later. In that case, the young black man shoplifted something from a convenience store. Then he paced around a while outside the store, talking to himself, acting nuts. Then he went BACK into the same convenience store, the owner or clerk of which apparently (as in Ferguson) didn’t report the crime to the cops. Then he stole something else. Pastries, iirc. This time, as in Ferguson, a customer or bystander called the police. When they arrived, he advanced on them, yelling: Shoot me, shoot me now. Something to that effect. They told him to get down and he didn’t. He pulled a knife on the cops and wouldn’t give up. He advanced on them until they shot and killed him. Both cops emptied their guns which, contrary to what Dr. Baden says about nobody shooting 6 times, is standard police procedure. When threatened and taking deadly action, they empty their guns until the threat is removed. So, in both cases here, it SEEMED AS IF these guys were on some kind of mission. (As with the bizarre lone shooters who are also young men acting irrationally.) What WERE these guys on? Why would Brown make that strange comment, which has been taken off Facebook? Why would the second guy literally beg to be shot? Is this a new form of (jihadist) “suicide” by cop? Sacrificing self for the “greater good” of inciting racial animus and everything that’s come from it?

  7. This fellow has probably been published in “peer reviewed journals”: http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/08/21/famous-atheist-richard-dawkins-says-its-our-moral-duty-to-kill-the-mentally-retarded/

    “In addition to exterminating millions of Jews, Nazi Germany also killed gypsies (Romani), Christians (Edith Stein and Maximilian Kolbe are examples), the physically handicapped, and the mentally retarded, including those with Down Syndrome.

    Now a famous atheist, 73-year-old British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, says it would be “immoral” not to abort a baby with Down Syndrome, which is another way of saying it is our moral duty to kill those with Down Syndrome. …”

  8. ^^^^ ~?~?~ ^^^ AS WE SIT on OUR… THUMBS oh brother!

  9. You actually have to wonder which one is the cartoon and which one is real: http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/08/21/missouri-newspaper-under-attack-for-posting-cartoon-of-mike-brown-looters-protestors/

    There is the “logic” taught in our schools. Isn’t that sign carried by those young individuals RATHER RACIST? “YOU’VE” killed “our kind”? Who, perchance, do they mean when they refer to “you?”

    Some community is supposed to “sacrifice” the life of an individual human being who has God-given rights to LIFE and LIBERTY to save another “community” and “businesses”. The businesses to be saved, I assume, are those being looted and destroyed not by Officer Wilson but by members of the Ferguson community. In addition, those and other businesses are being destroyed by the publicity surrounding the FALSE accusations of police brutality and murder that have led to daily disruptive “protests” of non-existent events.

    • He said it better than I did.

    • You know what else is ironic? The media is doing a great job of vetting Officer Wilson’s family, and implying that his mother’s actions when he was a “child” somehow disqualify him from being a cop. IF ONLY they would vet the family of Obama and then tell the TRUTH about, for one, his terrorist-sympathizing brother. Then see if any of that disqualifies Barry.

      I’m looking forward to the similar treatment of Michael Brown’s family by the St. Louis newspaper.

    • Very good observation…….

    • Yes interesting….don’t know where my last comment went, but I thought this a very appealing observation Zen

    • Wow. Is that what that book is about? The 100 years war? Isn’t that what Game of Thrones was loosely based upon? I didn’t realize the topic. I’ve had that book for years and never opened it. I’ll have to go find it now. It sounds interesting.

      • Doesn’t the description of the typical “victim” fit the legend of Barry perfectly? Starts out as a saint until some people discover he’s a thug?

    • “… So what’s the source of the problem? As Publius notes, the problem is not among the black population as a whole; rather, it is due to a “small sub-culture that glorifies violence and lives and dies by the gun.” It is the gang culture, characterized by widespread criminality, tribalistic warfare, through-the-roof unemployment, extremely high rates of out-of-wedlock births (72.1 percent among blacks in 2010), widespread welfare dependency, and nihilistic art typified by “gangster rap.” …”

      That “culture” is the VERY culture that Barry invites into our WH and entertains with lavish weekly parties.

  10. “OLD”… happy face… as ONLY 10 % … Share the ~ ” L O V E ” !
    RACE RACE RACE-ing O’ ~ WHERE R WE RACE-ing 2 ?


    • Who the heck are the 10%? People living in a cave? Or maybe a mad house? On second thought, we’re in the mad house.


  12. so then I’ll bring JOHN … over this way…

    http://www.michellesmirror.com/ link

    • That imagine peace stuff is wishful thinking on their parts. They prefer to believe that rather than the truth, which is that what’s happening is EXACTLY AS PLANNED by Barry.

    • This is funny:

      The Objects (subjects?) of Michelle’s Mirror sure are!

  13. O’…. I see above MY Dear John, ^^^ … Can B opened up on the
    Left Box….O’… Ya just learn some-thing each & every DAY HERE!

    NOW ~ 4 ~ IF WHITES ~ WERE ~ BLACK! ETC. ~ @MM


  14. HEY BUSTER…I DE-MAND A …RE-FUN-D $$$… or another TV NOW!

  15. NO….MIRI…. this is FUNNY….. BRACE YOUR~SELF…..
    ~ F E R G U S O N ….. is RED HOT…. AGAIN! .. R U READY?
    ~ E X O N E R A T I O N ~ HOUR ???


  16. O’ so much more 2 the STORY…. mike brown deserved a better life
    ALL the children deserve a better life… STOP just “HAVING” so many
    KIDS…. DO A BETTER JOB ….. If you bring them into this world…
    grow it like a strong oak tree… PROTECT IT…. FEED IT … OWN IT!


    • It figures that they will explain away the lyrics of his “songs” by saying you can’t tell if it’s just made up. Right. The family are the ones just making things up–like “gentle giant”. So once again, the UK media do the job that the U.S. media won’t. Where is a similar profile of the Brown family in, say, his local hometown paper? Even Captain Johnson gets the kid glove treatment. They will say what his parents did for a living, but not name them or say where they live. They similarly don’t name the children or wives/significant others. Why is that? Somehow it’s important to know the name of Officer Wilson’s ex-wife and his current girlfriend and even how many bathrooms in the house where he grew up.

      You know, it’s total BS about the “dark underbelly” of the town where Big Mike grew up if they’re talking about Ferguson. First of all, he didn’t grow up in Ferguson, was only there for THIS ONE SUMMER. Second–Ferguson is for the most part a typical, middle-class suburb. ONLY that huge complex of low-income housing is the “dark underbelly” of Ferguson. Stories I read said that those 3 complexes were built only about a decade ago and quickly filled up with inner-city blacks from St. Louis who were fleeing the drugs and violence. Except, as noted before, they apparently brought the drugs and violence with them. I wonder if the autopsy showed alcohol in his system, too, seeing as how the family now notes that he would snitch brandy or “sneak the odd Bud-Light” with friends.

  17. the CHURCH prepares for ~ Michael Browns Funeral ~ Monday…

    if that DAY ~ that ground-hog DAY could have been difference ~ 2 late
    ~ 4 such foolishness “CAME DOWN” 2 get YOUR Point Across…. O’
    & a shit LOAD …. of SOME other PERSON’s “FREE-2-U-STUFF” just
    NASTY ~ ( HEY…pull your BLACK FRIENDS UP- GANG UP) USE that BRAIN …. ASK 4 HELP …. STOP with the DRUGS…if you want to be HAPPY… many POWER-FUL BLACK MEN we HONOR HERE ~ “KNOW”
    what NEEDS 2 be done 4 ~ “REAL CHANGE” ~ NOT ~ O B A M A ‘ S

    C H A N G E …. & U MUST WORK 4 IT! NO! …. it’s NOT FREE!
    & I’ll BET the cops will IN FACT LEAVE … “U” ALONE ~ ALSO !


    • As if this is a state funeral and he a HERO of some kind. It’s sad. It’s so perverse. It’s unbelievable. And the lies go on.

    • Yes, yes. Lemon did the “vetting” of the officer and reported the video to the powers that be. It seems that only looting thugs have First Amendment rights and we know how obots roll. Search and DESTROY. If you’re a cop, whatever you do, don’t DARE to diss Barry. However, his boss, Chief Belmar, claims to the media that the only reason he is investigating this officer is some comment about how he’s a killing machine.

      As usual, it seems that not holding the politically correct view of affirmative action, Obama as (allegedly) eligible, gay as normal, the Declaration of Independence, and islam being (allegedly) a religion of peace means that (1) the Constitution and its God-given rights do not apply to you, (2) nor do equal protection laws or civil rights laws apply to you, and (3) you cannot be allowed to even make a living in this country. You are to be PURGED or at least (they hope) sent to re-education gulag.

      btw, I’m not a Don Lemon watcher butt have seen selected outrageous videos of him when people link to the idiotic and racist things HE SAYS on a so-called unbiased news network. Can we have equality here? Can Don Lemon be sent for psychological evaluation, too?

      If this policeman has to lose his job for voicing his opinion, then Eric Holder, Barack Obama (or whoever he is), Ron Johnson, Jamilah Nasheed, Governor Nixon, Atty. General Koster, and the other idiotic politicians and office holders who did NOT defend the right of Officer Wilson to a presumption of innocence and who immediately took the side of the “black community” should all be sent to remedial Civics Class and then fired or impeached. They are UNFIT to serve.

      • Story today at the St. Louis paper’s website actually talks about what a great job Capt. Johnson did and also, on their “religion” page, noted that Nation of Islam has never been known for advocating violence (yes, it said that) and said that Capt. Johnson was grateful to them for the help they gave him and the fabulous job they did in “keeping the peace.”

        SOMEHOW, I SUPPOSE, THE REPORTERS AT ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH MISSED THE VIDEO OF MALIK SHABAZZ CALLING FOR OFFICER WILSON TO BE DEAD. Of course, Shabazz, a “protege” of Farrakhan, claims to not belong to NOI. Cute, huh? http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/articles/6323/the-revolutionarys-war However, this story says he was their spokesperson. Just like Barry claims that he learns about every scandal perpetrated by his minions in the newspapers.

  18. Dudes, you’ve been had. Too bad everybody and their uncle has tweeted, blogged, commented yada, yada, yada……that’s why ole camera shy criminals didn’t mind being captured on video…..thats was the name of the game. I wasn’t interested too much from the start, but now I can see why the video was being withheld ….and saved till the last minute. You’ve been had. That’s why this whole event has been stage crafted right down to the whitey dude grabbing Brown by the neck. And the federal lawyers. You might ask yourself why Miriam Conrad……the same felonious stool pigeon who along with a hand full of federal attorneys that help turn out other so called terrorist right back into the public cash of stool pigeons. She along with lawyers like Miriam Siefer, Rick Helfrick , along with some insane judges . Thanks Eric Holder we couldn’t have done the take over without you. This was the biggest carnival with every bit of media joining in. It made me sick. TV , media, internet was to perpetuate this nonsensical fervor and it worked. You can now have your federal funding for more camera’s and video 24/7 just like you want. THank you for this entertainment folks. Put yur hand up dudes. Everyone fell for it. THe best thing you could do is walk away from the TV, turn the station or turn it off and quit commenting like the rest of the stool pigeons.

    • Black Panthers Lead Death Chant for Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, MO

      Black Panthers went into Ferguson , along with NAACP. The Black Panthers associates itself with the Nation of Islam. Nation of Islam also went to Ferguson.

      Remember… How NAACP seemed so unconcerned with the New Black Panther voting intimidation case? The Justice Department effectively won the case when the judge directed the Civil Rights Division to file a final motion. But rather than seek a default judgment to ensure that defendants could not participate in future voter intimidation tactics, the Obama Administration abruptly dropped charges against all but one of the defendants.

      You have too put the 2+2=4’s into prospective as too whats going on in Ferguson…..

      Let me start here Alfy, and I know you know all of this, but let go back a little in time…

      Rev. Wright married Obama to Michelle and also Baptized their kids. “Black Liberation Theology” is all about advancing Communist revolution. keeping in mind Iran also practices Liberation Theology and also as a side note… what about all that’s going on in Syria Is..Is. Syria is a big backer of Iran. And now notice the red line is no longer, suddenly we are on Asaid’s side to help with Is..Is? The “rebels” we possibly sent arms to? The leader of Is..Is we HAD in custody at one time, but let go? Notice how Is..Is seemed to break loose “after” the Bergdahl exchange…humm. Guatemala/Nicaragua, the “refuge’s” swarming across the border that practice Liberation Theology. Also keeping in mind Liberation theology in Nicaragua in the mid-1980’s was a pro-Sandinista, pro-Marxist, anti-U.S., anti-Catholic Church movement that Wright supported. And one last one for now, VJ’s connection to Iran. Is..Is.. is in the U.S., our leaders have now admitted it, how did they get here? OUR OPEN BORDER. Unbelievable that we have Is..Is that have Citizenship in this Country that we have not arrested or even pulled their passports. And the biggest question remains, WHY is Barry wanting to ignore Is..Is? Never forget this, BHO Sr. was Sunni, “If” BHO is Barrys father what does that make Barry by birth? Easy guess.

      An added quote from Rev. Wright –

      “God D*** America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11″
      “America’s chickens… are coming home… to ROOST!”

      –Rev Dr. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s pastor for twenty years

      The New Black Panther Party, the original Black Panther Party, the Weather Underground and of course the Black Liberation Army all advocated Communist “Liberation”.

      A quote from MALIK ZULU SHABAZZ – Leader of New Black Panther Party

      ““The only solution any time there is a funeral in the black community, is a funeral in the police community.” * “Kill every goddamn Zionist in Israel! Goddamn little babies, goddamn old ladies! Blow up Zionist supermarkets!” * “America should be glad that every black man is not on a killing spree for all the suffering they [white Americans] have done.” * “If any racist, straw-chewin’ tobacco-chewin’ racist redneck lays their hand on any black man or woman in this county, crush that devil that is trying to do you harm and to do you evil in the name of God and in accordance with your legal rights.”

      Shabazz has stated I met Louis Farrakhan on my college campus and it absolutely changed my life. Shabazz became a member of the Nation of Islam, and in 1995 helped organize and promote Farrakhan’s “Million Man March” in Washington, DC. [which Barry took part in] Shabazz became a member of the rap music group the Defiant Giants. [is this where they “decidedly” came up with Brown as a “Gentle Giant”? Reversing Defiant for Gentle, reversing psychology? Shabazz also helped record the album Rise, Black Man, Rise. Shabazz has stated, America should be glad that every black man is not on a killing spree for all the suffering they [white Americans] have done.” Shabazz’s namesake was among the 110 names and 481 visits released by the White House in 2009. Among the famous names that stood out on the brief list were Shabazz, Jeremiah Wright and William Ayers. The Black Panther Party announced in 2009 their intent to come after those who disagree with Barack Obama. EyeBlast.tv has rare video of the New Black Panthers Chairman Malik Shabazz from a closed door meeting, the footage shows him praising Osama bin Laden just 6 months after the September 11 terrorist attacks on March 22, 2002.

      Communist Group Revcom From Chicago Bused Members into St. Louis to Hijack the Protests and Start a Revolution. Chicago, Barrys home town.

      Amnesty International sent groups into Ferguson. Amnesty International? interesting….

      Holder, Department of “JustUS” we know where he came from and his back ground.

      We knew all of this information about Barrys “People” and all their intentions back in 2008. They are Communists/Revolutionist.

      2006, Senator Obama Campaigned for Raila Odinga in Kenya that started a revolution for “Change”, in this revolution hundreds of Christians were locked in side Churches and burned to death.

      And now the utter silence of the Iraqi Christians being murdered by Is..Is..

      These people want the US destroyed so they can rebuild it to their own Theology, which includes Islam, Marxism/Communism. Their on a mission and will not be stopped until the people in Congress stop them. Will that happen, Congress stopping them? Not yet? Where’s that leave US? Soon with no options.

      Just my 2 cent’s Alf 😉

      • Excellent summary, Leza. TY. You covered all the bases. Yep. commie revolutionaries:

        Color scheme said it all.

          • You’re correct. Black and red. Tell me that’s not Aunt Zeituni there.

            • Can we call it or what! Among the mourners were – Representative Maxine Waters of California.

              Miri, awhile back I posted some research on the L.A. riots and I have tried everything to find it to no avail. please do me a huge favor, can you try to find it and post it here. If you find it you’ll see why I’d like it posted here. TY

              • Is this it? https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2013/08/07/lost-and-found-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120248 Wow, Leza. This is scary. I’m sure the next wave of rioting and looting is already being planned. McCulloch says the Grand Jury will probably finish in mid-October, so just in time for the election. And, of course, if there’s rioting and unrest in black neighborhoods, it wouldn’t be “fair” to hold any election when the poor old black folks are afraid to leave their homes. The activists are openly using the word “revolution” in their speeches regarding this Brown incident.

                • That’s it Miri, thank you much.

                  From the research –

                  What Really Happened During the Rodney King Riots

                  Snip ~

                  On May 9, 1992, the Los Angeles Times printed a picture of rival Blood and Crip gang members meeting in Solidarity with members of the Nation of Islam. The article mentioned the flyers calling for “Open Season on LAPD.” Other flyers from the “Coalition for Justice” called for a general strike to shut down L.A. on May 15. They also demanded federal troops be removed, the release of all suspects arrested during the riot, reparations to rebuild the burned out riot zone, and the release of the Libyan bombers of the airliner over Scotland.


                  Like I said 2+2 =

              • Still looking for the research on the L.A. riots, still to no avail. Sorry for having to ask you to find it Miri, but your the pro at digging up old research.

                Something to chew on until maybe it can be found, it relates to what I’m trying to find.

                Maxine Waters – She called the 1992 Los Angeles riots a “rebellion,” and bellowed, “No justice, no peace!”

                Kerosene Maxine to Tea Party: “Go to Hell!”

                August 25, 2011

                “I’m not afraid of anybody. … And as far as I’m concerned, the tea party can go straight to hell.” — Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif.

                Waters’ list of insults, vulgarities and blame-whitey scapegoating easily makes her the Al Sharpton of Congress.

                Waters once said of the then-sitting president: “I would like to … say … very clearly that I believe George (H.W.) Bush is a racist.” She routinely refers to the Republican Party as “the enemy.” She also referred to Republican former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan as a “plantation owner.”

                She called the 1992 Los Angeles riots a “rebellion,” and bellowed, “No justice, no peace!” She defended looters: “There were mothers who took this as an opportunity to take some milk, to take some bread, to take some shoes. Maybe they shouldn’t have done it, but the atmosphere was such that they did it. They are not crooks.” Waters said: “One lady said her children didn’t have any shoes. She just saw those shoes there, a chance for all of her children to have new shoes. Goddamn it! It was such a tear-jerker. I might have gone in and taken them for her myself.”

                In 1973, the former Black Panther Joanne Chesimard shot and killed a New Jersey state trooper. Found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in prison, Chesimard escaped from a New Jersey penitentiary and fled to Cuba. Congress passed a resolution urging Castro to extradite her to this country. But Waters wrote Castro a letter, urging him to keep the “persecuted … political activist” and likened the cop killer to Martin Luther King, since Chesimard had been “persecuted for her civil rights work”!
                Waters rarely sees a white officer/black suspect encounter she cannot turn into a racial episode. In the Los Angeles suburb of Inglewood, a white police officer slammed a black youth on his car and later punched the youth because, according to the officer, the teen grabbed the officer’s genitals.

                Why, shades of Rodney King, according to Waters, who said: “I don’t see white police officers slamming the heads of little white boys into police cars. I haven’t seen them abusing white males. What I see is white police officers abusing black males, and young black males particularly. Yes, I believe it’s racially motivated.” Note: Inglewood, a town of over 100,000 people, consists of nearly all black and Hispanic residents. This automatically makes any white officer involved in a scuffle with practically any Inglewood suspect a target of accusations of racial discrimination and police brutality.
                Waters’ tea party attack once again exposes her as one of the most racist, hateful and vulgar members of Congress — prompting Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum to call her “vile.” He was far too kind.


  19. Michael Brown Jr. …. BORN ON ~ MAY 20, 1996 ~

    Born May 20, 1996[20]
    Died August 9, 2014 (aged 18) ~ Ferguson, Missouri, U.S.
    Cause of death ~ Gunshot wounds[21] ~ Ethnicity Black[22]
    Occupation Student

    Michael Brown Jr. (May 20, 1996 – August 9, 2014) was the son of Lesley McSpadden & Mike Brown Sr.[23] Brown graduated from Normandy High School in St. Louis 8 days before his death, Completing an Alternative Education Program.[24] His teachers said he was “a student who loomed large & didn’t cause trouble”, referring to him as a “Gentle Giant”.[25][26] At the time of his death, he was 6’4″ (1.93m) tall & weighed 292 lb [3] He was an amateur rapper & posted tracks online under the name Big’Mike.[27]

    Brown was to have started attending Vatterott College, a technical school, on August 11,[26][28] with plans to become a heating & cooling engineer.[26] A friend of Brown said that while everyone else wanted to be a basketball or football player, Brown had wanted to own his own business.

    • That’s interesting that Wiki notes that he actually graduated from high school only 8 days before he died. His diploma is dated MAY. This is what they do so they don’t socially traumatize those who are flunking out. Let’s treat them all with kid gloves and coddle them, lest their “self esteem” suffer. Schools give failing students a diploma and then let them take part in the graduation ceremony even before they’ve done the remedial courses to qualify to graduate. It’s like social promotion. It’s probably a cinch that he would “finish” the degree by simply showing up at the classes over the summer.

    • Those trade schools make millions, if not billions, off educating people who get taxpayer money to “attend”. I put “attend” in quotes because often times the checks come through and the student doesn’t show and, as usual, our inefficient government does NOT follow up to ensure the money went where it was supposed to go. It’s all good, though, for a Cloward-Piven kind of POtuS–redistributes wealth to his peeps, no matter what. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/02/as-minority-enrollments-s_n_916541.html

      “Advertisements on television and on subway trains often cater to black or Hispanic consumers, featuring a testimonial or image of a minority student achieving his or her dream of employment. Documents obtained by a Senate committee showed one for-profit college company, Vatterott Colleges Inc., listing “welfare mom w/ kids” as an example of a top prospect in handouts given to recruiters.

      The rationale is that lower-income borrowers are eligible for the most in federal student loan dollars and Pell Grants, which represent the vast majority of revenues for the for-profit sector.

      “The individual gets lost in this; it’s all about the dollars,” said Arnold Mitchem, president of the Council for Opportunity in Education, which represents low-income students. “The students in this debate and discussion are ciphers. You might as well be talking about bushels of corn, or wheat, or soybeans. They’re just commodities. That’s what it amounts to.”

      Although minority students are enrolled at much higher rates in the for-profit college sector, critics have questioned whether programs are adequately educating students. Graduation rates for black and Hispanic students seeking bachelor’s degrees in the for-profit sector are significantly lower than those of minority students who attended public universities –- hovering at 16 percent for black students and 28 percent for Hispanic students. … ‘They cannot be the educational equivalent to payday lenders.'”

      BUTT they are the equivalent, they do not turn out educated people who get jobs, and the taxpayers are the ones enriching these schools, AFTER having already paid multiple times for these “children” to be educated in grade school, summer school, middle school, summer school, high school, remedial education summer school, etc.

      • It was a shock when sons went to state university and a whole class of people were there, living in the form, and not going to classes. These so-called students said their job was to live there for the first semester and then leave.

        • I know, WAH. I have friends who had the same experience, their kids, and myself. I’ve written about it before–how all those students on Pell Grants in some universities and trade schools WILL pass because if they do not, if they disappear, then there are no BUTTS in the seats for which the taxpayers PAY. I sometimes watch Judge Judy while cleaning or cooking dinner. She’s wont to ask her litigants how they support themselves or, for example, where did they get the money for, say, a car when they’re unemployed or living at some baby mama’s apartment. Too often they say they get checks for school–checks in sums like $5000 to $7000. Then they boldly state that they spent the money on cars or big-screen TVs or video game consoles, etc. Usually whatever it is that they’re fighting over in court. The government doesn’t police it. If they don’t attend, then sometimes the schools say they did, anyway, because if they don’t, the tuition money that’s paid directly to the school might disappear. The checks the students themselves get are not for tuition. They’re gravy! They get those checks for “expenses” like housing or books or transportation. If they don’t go or flunk out, and if it was a grant, apparently nobody goes after them to pay back the money. I have to say, also, that I’ve heard numerous anecdotes about how the financial aid people at these schools try NOT to give grants to white people, even if they qualify. They don’t really “help” them and in the case of students “of color” the aid people help them to lie on the applications so that they WILL qualify. It’s like ACORN was caught teaching people how to lie to get stuff. Some see it as “reparations” that are “owed”, and these monies, in their opinion, are reserved for the “oppressed” minorities.

  20. Michael wanted to “OWN his OWN”.. Business.. ONE DAY.. & if the
    GANGS would have smashed in & STOLE “HIS” STUFF…. as we SAW
    in Ferguson
    I ponder HOW
    he would have taken IT???

  21. HEY HOLDER (eric).. the “OTHER RACE BAIT-ER” … bit another
    YOU can’t “think” …. what you Say is any Help … CAN U ?


  22. http://www.academia.org/the-origins-of-political-correctness/

    There’s a pertinent article.

    Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.

    First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.
    [It’s here now, in Ferguson, MO.]

    Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. [Thus you cannot say, for example, that blacks can be racist, too.] People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state. …”

    And that is why Sgt. Page must be reeducated, made to apologize, psychologically intimidated and analyzed, and then fired. It’s also why LTC Lakin had to be “punished”.

    • America today is in the throes of the greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Congress is now moving to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And we don’t recognize it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s growing and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy, everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture.

    • ~ Avatar ~ deconstructed Alex Taylor • 26 minutes ago

      As Zeek Emanuel has eloquently said, there is no conspiracy. It’s right there in the open, in front of everyone (though the fact that the media refuses to publish it might be a conspiracy). Qatar bankrolled Barack Obama. Qatar wanted the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, wanted Iraq oil offline, wanted Libyan oil offline, wanted Tunisian oil offline, wanted a pipeline through Syria that required getting rid of Assad, etc. Qatar bankrolled ISIS/ISIL. Qatar is heavily implicated in AQ, particularly since high instability makes the price of oil so extremely tasty for the Emirs.

      And what Qatar wants, Barry does.

      ~ Obamahatesvets deconstructed • 12 minutes ago
      YEP…. “Gutter” … apropos name for his birthplace !!!

        • If Mooch had another daughter, she’d look like …

          • Well, sure. That video of him assaulting the little shopkeeper proves he was a “gentle soul”. Can’t apparently say the same for his body. Being “gentle”, I mean. RIP. I don’t want to demean the deceased because he was, after all, only 18 years old. There may have been hope for him and we can only pray for his soul that any sins he committed were repented of before he died. It is a shame and a sad waste of a life that might have been promising, in other circumstances. Those who laud him today failed him miserably during his lifetime. I suspect they know that, but turn the blame outward, to others. http://gds44.wordpress.com/2014/08/25/a-tale-of-two-funerals-judson-phillips/ Read that one, when you have time.

            • Let me add this: The family, it’s said, wants peace but it sure sounds otherwise: His uncle said Michael’s “blood is crying from the ground, crying for vengeance …” VENGEANCE is mine, sayeth The Lord. A minister ought to know that.

                • ~ ST. LOUIS (AP) the Funeral List ~

                  The Rev. Jesse Jackson was in the pews, along with entertainers

                  Sean Combs … MC Hammer …. Spike Lee.

                  The parents of Trayvon Martin, & a cousin of Emmitt Till …

                  Several politicians also attended, including U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill

                  & U.S. Rep. William Lacy Clay.

                • His cousin, Eric Davis, urged those in attendance to go to the polls &
                  push for change. He told the crowd: “We have had enough of the senseless killings.” ….. ???
                  Brown’s uncle, Bernard Ewing, recalled Brown as a “big guy, but a kind, gentle soul.” …@ dailymail.com

                  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-2733988/Browns-cousin-Enough-senseless-killings.html#ixzz3BRFOeGhe
                  Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

                • Hmmm. Mom has no shoes? New tatt or old one? Somewhere else, I saw that one of the “stars” of that Oprah TV show about Sweetie Pies escorted the grandma from the church, as she was overcome. Did Puffy have on the red and black, too?

                  • Relatives & friends remembered him as a “gentle giant” who Turned 2 Religion in HIS Last Days & HAD ~ “Premonitions of HIS OWN Death” ?
                    weird ? … ( AT 18 ? life was going 2 soon END? Why so soon ? )

                    but TAURUS the “BULL” as Michael Brown was born in MAY… & as
                    much “RED” was worn for his Funeral I wonder what he might have felt being a GENTLE BULL~ that’s OFTEN known 2 CHARGE ~ AT RED!

                    If that’s 2 BE TRUE. ~ 1 was STEVIE WONDER… & many whom
                    spoke it & did in fact … died after BUTT’ … not all ~ of COURSE!
                    it’s really in their DNA … mick jaggers gal pal hung with self with her
                    “scarf” .. she was a Taurus Lady & robin williams a triple water sign
                    had Taurus playing around in his gloom & doom state of dis-spare
                    as he himself hung himself with a “belt” …
                    2 believe that life being so earthy CAN… trick the gentle bulls often
                    & that they also have the Planet VENUS (love) sweetens them alot!

                    SO would that BE why he Charged ? wanting to BE in HEAVEN? with
                    A Father who would Always LOVE & PROTECT HIM ? I ponder..

                    Butt’ Sharpton brought the Service BACK to the Fatal Act that Riveted
                    the Nation & Reopened OLD Wounds of Racial Discrimination & Distrust.

                    YEP, .. you go Sharp-TON… get your MILES out of IT ~ DO TELL!

                    He RE-called the Scene after the shooting: “Michael Brown, 18-year-old boy, laid in the street, 1 & 1/2 hour before the Detective Came.
                    Another hour or so before they came in Remove his Body….
                    Family couldn’t come through the ropes. Dogs sniffing through.

                    SO ? ~ It’s A “Crime Scene” ? sad so close to the parents Butt’ were
                    the Detectives some other place? NOT able to GET right on IT? were
                    dogs sniffing for a bomb or something else? I ponder all this also…
                    OR… was it again… A SET UP ~ A RED FLAG… OR were they busy
                    JAM-IN the PHONE LINES ~ IN HOW BEST 2 WORK ~ the DRAMA?

                    • This is why the Grand Jury decision will come out RIGHT BEFORE the election. They KNOW what the decision will likely be, based upon the truth and the evidence, and so they WILL ramp up the anger and outrage, if not the looting and rioting, to get those votes or (best case for them) to cancel elections because it wouldn’t be “fair” to the black communities. Alternately, they can allow the election to take place and when they don’t like the result, THEN claim it was an unfair election because so many blacks were intimidated by the rioting or the evil white people and cops who might shoot them on the way to the polls. See? Win/win for them. Not for those hurt or even killed by the rioting, but when did Barry ever let a thousand or so deaths bother him (see “Raila Odinga” and Barry’s advice to him in 2007)? In fact, when it goes against him, he can just ramp up the rhetoric and anger and potential rioting all the more.

                    • OMG. Read this part:
                      “Michael Brown Spent Last Weeks Grappling With Problems and Promise

                      FERGUSON, Mo. — It was 1 a.m. and Michael Brown Jr. called his father, his voice trembling. He had seen something overpowering. In the thick gray clouds that lingered from a passing storm this past June, he made out an angel. And he saw Satan chasing the angel and the angel running into the face of God. Mr. Brown was a prankster, so his father and stepmother chuckled at first.

                      “No, no, Dad! No!” the elder Mr. Brown remembered his son protesting. “I’m serious.”

                      And the black teenager from this suburb of St. Louis, who had just graduated from high school, sent his father and stepmother a picture of the sky from his cellphone. “Now I believe,” he told them. …”

                      Did y’all see that black cloud going around in the Twitterverse and the Facebookverse lately? He didn’t see it in the sky; if he saw it at all, it was on a computer screen. This is BS and more of the same BS BOGUS NARRATIVE, probably invented by the same full of BS writers as devised Barry’s bogus legend. I’m sorry but I’m sick to death of all this BS. Now that we know that the WH and Sharpton collude together, it becomes even more likely that Barry’s “writers” are helping invent the narrative. We don’t need another LEGEND.

                      So what are they doing here? Setting up a scenario where the officer was wrong because little Mike Mike was schizophrenic or something and Wilson ought to be trained to deal with mentally ill perps? Brown’s innocent of thuggery on account of mental illness?

                      If he had such delusions, they came from the drugs he was on. More and more I suspect he dipped those blunts in PCP. It causes aggression, violence, and delusions.

                      However, marijuana is NO benign drug, either, especially not if abused in quantity over a long time. Combined with alcohol and other drugs? A recipe for disaster, which is what he got. They KNOW what the toxicology will probably show. We shall see, although McCulloch said it could take 6 weeks, so at least another month.

                      Now wouldn’t it be enlightening for the NY Times to explore that issue of the prior “scuffle with a neighbor?” Since the media go to great lengths to avoid calling his “scuffle” with the store owner an ASSAULT, which is what it was, I wonder what the true nature of his scuffle with the neighbor was.

                      Did this happen before or after age 18? Did anyone call police? Someone on GP, in comments, mentioned that he did have a record as an adult. Something that happened after his 18th birthday and, iirc, the commenter mentioned assault. I don’t find anything like it in the public records, but I may not be looking in the right place. It could be the “scuffle” with the neighbor. NY Times knows all about it, but they’re not talking.

                      BTW, they APOLOGIZED for saying in that same article that Mike Mike was “no angel”. That must have been a horrid racist microaggression on their part, these writers who suffer from “white privilege”, because some of their readers perceived their words as casting aspersions on the gentle giant and/or implying that he deserved to die for doing what “normal teens” do. I consider the teens in my family normal and they don’t devise or “sing” obscene misogynistic “songs”, nor do they steal cigarillos and assault store owners, nor do they disobey cops or punch them in the head.

                    • You know what? Barry “dabbled” in alcohol and drugs, too. Isn’t it cute how they minimize it?

                    • Another btw, his grandmother said early on that she saw him RUNNING down the street and she passed him in her car. Later on, when she returned home, she found the scene of the shooting, with Mike Mike lying in the street. Running? That’s not what Dorian Johnson said. In that story, Johnson says Mike hit “the ground with his hands raised in surrender.” He did? If so, then the photos of him lying on the ground, where he lay shot, would show his arms over his head. They’re not over his head. Maybe the reporter was too traumatized to look at the photos and/or check what he was told against available evidence. You know, use a little journalistic SKEPTICISM instead of taking at face value what this family, says. They give a little background on Brown in that story, BUTT they neglect to add the kind of details that they made sure to report about Officer Wilson’s family. For example, rap sheets. Names of siblings. Age of parents when he was born. I was right–he lived with grandma so he could go to school in that district. This is a no-no unless grandma is the legal guardian of the “child”. What the family says about him not having a juvenile record is at odds with other reports. He only pretended to be in the gang to “get along,” you see. (This is so like how the media and the administration explain away EVERY discrepancy in Barry’s LEGEND.) There are quite a few “tells” in that tale: Why, for example, do they go to lengths to advise us that he was a “handful” as a child? ADHD? ODD? Look how the friend tries to explain away his bullying manner:

                      “Mr. Lewis said he recalled Mr. Brown getting into one fight. A contemporary they knew from the neighborhood was upset with Mr. Brown because of something Mr. Brown had said to the young man’s girlfriend. So one day the fellow, who was much smaller than Mr. Brown, took a swing at him. Mr. Brown backed up and pushed him back in the face.

                      “I don’t think Mike ever threw a real punch,” said Mr. Lewis, 19.

                      The young man’s father confronted Mr. Brown, Mr. Lewis recalled, asking him why he put his hands on his son. Mr. Brown’s father got involved, Mr. Lewis said, and they settled the dispute and went their separate ways. Mr. Brown rarely got into physical confrontations, Mr. Lewis said, because he was so big that nobody really wanted to test him. Mr. Brown tended to use his size to scare away potential trouble, Mr. Lewis said.

                      “He’ll swell up like, ‘I’m mad,’ and you’ll back off,” he said.”

                      You see, he wasn’t REALLY bullying or assaulting that little shopkeeper. He was just trying to “scare away potential trouble.”

                  • From the DARK 2 the LIGHT…. Stevie Wonder …. what he did with
                    what was dealt 2 HIM…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s