Projection and Unconscious Confession

There’s an interesting series of articles by Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., who is a forensic profiler. Hodges

works with words and analyzes the “see-all, tell-all unconscious mind” of people. He calls it the “super intelligence” and through psycholinguistics observes “how a person’s words reveal deeper unconscious messages.” …

He explains,

As a forensic profiler, I serve as a translator who decodes unique linguistic expressions that derive from a person’s deep unconscious, his super intelligence.  [emphasis added to quotes]

Hodges has analyzed some of Barack Obama’s speeches and proposed that Obama’s words denote projection as well as unconscious confession. When Obama projects, according to Hodges, his

description of ‘others’ unconsciously fits his own behavior. Here is the proverbial log in his own eye, sins that he so glibly sees in those who oppose him.

In another article in the series, Hodges illustrates his technique for deciphering the layers of meaning in what people say:

[Hodges] uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called “the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators. He’s not exactly new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. …

About the last debate [of the 2012 presidential campaign], he writes, “His [Obama’s] super intelligence moral compass causes him to make a huge slip revealing indeed he is a foreigner and an illegal president. First he went on to talk about how he ‘set up a task force to go after cheaters when it came to international [foreign] trade.’ The message: catch the foreign cheater. “Now for his great slip and confession. He then noted how China the ‘cheater’ was ‘flooding us with cheap domestic – or – or cheap Chinese tires,’” he said.

“The cheating foreigner first appears to have cheap American goods but (clarifying his slip) really the foreigner has cheap foreign goods. Read Obama doesn’t really have American goods, he has foreign goods – cheap goods. A huge confession [that] he has cheapened the presidency – the secret foreigner who passed himself off as American. With his creative slip he tells us that he was a cheap foreign-born imitation of an American president—confessing to how he had specifically terrorized America,” he said. …

Never underestimate such a crucial slip (similar to his slip taking the presidential oath when it had to be repeated privately and when he referred to his ‘Muslim faith’ during an interview.),” he said.

Hodges previously reported that during Obama’s first two presidential debates with Romney, the president repeatedly confessed to being ineligible.

“From my experience as a forensic profiler, I know when a guilty person starts to break. Law enforcement describes how guilty suspects show signs of cracking during an interrogation …

Whether or not  you accept the good doctor’s theories, it’s hard to argue with his success and it’s not hard at all to find other examples of Obama’s projection and seemingly unconscious confessions.

When Obama speaks, he relates everything to himself. Have you noticed? It’s as if he perceives himself to be the center of the universe, around which everything else revolves. Everything, literally everything in the universe, relates directly to him. He seems to view himself as a 21st century Amun-Ra.

Thus, Obama is not able to speak about any issue without introducing some kind of personal parable that proves to cement his connection to everything:

If Obama had a son, then he’d look like Trayvon.

While commemorating the 40th anniversary of  the Apollo 11 mission, Obama claimed that he sat on his grandfather’s shoulders, looking on as astronauts splashed down off Hawaii.

On the 70th anniversary of D-Day–yep! That was about Obama, too. He missed his grandfather who, he says, was in Normandy six days after the invasion.

An epidemic of concussions in organized sports? You guessed it: It’s about Obama:

When I was young and played football briefly, there were a couple times where I’m sure that that ringing sensation in my head and the needing to sit down for a while might have been a mild concussion.

An epidemic of bullying? Been there; done that:

I have to say, with big ears and the name that I have, I wasn’t immune. … I didn’t emerge unscathed. … We’ve said, ‘Kids will be kids.’ And so sometimes we overlook the real damage that bullying can do, especially when young people face harassment day after day, week after week.

Projection? You be the judge.

While honoring poet Maya Angelou with a medal, Obama used the occasion to claim that his sister was named after her. Everything is connected to Obama.

Very recently, while honoring singer Linda Ronstadt, Obama had to make it about himself by telling her that he

had a crush on her back in the day.

Sure he did. How flattered she must have been! Ronstadt is finally loved, at least by the most important person in Obama’s universe.

It’s all about Obama, always, all of the time, every day, day in and day out, sun rise and sun set. The universe revolves around him. Nothing matters unless it personally involves him, connects to him, or affects him. He’s the center of everything, and don’t you ever forget it.

To further illustrate what Hodges argues, considering that Obama seems to view himself as the center of everything, let’s examine what Obama said recently about company mergers and taxation. The comments touch upon a topic that’s often discussed at this blog–Obama’s citizenship.

President Barack Obama on Thursday demanded “economic patriotism” from U.S. corporations that use legal means to avoid U.S. taxes through overseas mergers.

“I don’t care if it’s legal,” Obama declared. “It’s wrong.”

Obama’s angry demand for patriotism from businesses may be an example of projection. Obama perceives a lack of “economic patriotism”, yet by so accusing, does he telegraph his own perceived lack of patriotism?

What about Obama’s accusation that unpatriotic companies use faux foreign tax addresses to “avoid U.S. taxes?” That’s wrong, Obama says, even if it’s legal. Is he projecting here, too?

It would be similarly wrong to use a faux foreign citizenship status to avoid college tuition, if one can get a scholarship that was set aside for foreign students. How about using a faux foreign citizenship status to avoid registering for the draft?

Obama says he doesn’t care if something’s legal, if it’s wrong, in his opinion. Conversely, you might forgiven if you come to believe that Obama also doesn’t care if something is illegal if, in his opinion, it’s right.

So Obama might decide, despite his oath of office, to ignore all manner of laws and to take unilateral and unconstitutional action, because he (the great and powerful and all-knowing) believes that it’s the right thing to do, not caring at all if it’s also illegal.

And so Obama’s DOJ can decide to not enforce immigration laws. His ICE can decide to, in effect, leave the borders open. His IRS can freely target his “enemies” and laugh at their FOIA requests by suffering convenient hard drive crashes. His EPA can use its regulatory power to punish companies that aren’t “green” enough and to make energy prices “necessarily skyrocket.” Obama can scoff at the Constitution’s requirements for presidential eligibility and then refuse to prove that he meets them. He can make unconstitutional recess appointments and then dare Congress and the courts to stop him. He puts the world on notice that he will do whatever he pleases if, in his opinion, what he pleases is right and the laws and the Constitution we follow are wrong.

The above-cited article about Obama’s opinion of unpatriotic businesses continued:

At issue are companies that [are] entering into arrangements with foreign companies, shifting their tax addresses overseas while retaining their U.S. headquarters.

“They’re technically renouncing their U.S. citizenship. They’re declaring they are based someplace else even though most of their operations are here,” Obama said at a technical college in Los Angeles. “You know some people are calling these companies corporate deserters.”

He also charged that such companies are “cherry-picking the rules.”

Because Obama can’t speak off the cuff without relating literally every issue to himself, and in light of Dr. Hodge’s theories about projection and unconscious confession, what might we make of the above quote?

We’ve already discussed how Obama and his administration cherry pick the rules. But what about that potentially very telling comment about “technically renouncing their U.S. citizenship?”

There is some evidence, documented in this post, that might lead one to conclude that Obama did renounce his U.S. citizenship (provided he originally had it) when he moved to Indonesia and became Barry Soetoro (aka Soebarkah).

Some contend that Obama may have renounced his U.S. citizenship (if he had it in the first place) and/or his Kenyan citizenship, when he traveled to Indonesia in 1981 and possibly renewed an Indonesian passport, which he then used to travel to Pakistan with his wealthy Muslim roommates from Occidental College.

As some may recall, Obama’s passport files were “breached” before the 2008 election, and his passport records were cauterized of “embarrassing information,” according to an anonymous source with inside information about the subsequent investigation into the breach.

Could the scrubbed information have been proof that Obama did indeed renounce his U.S. citizenship (either when he obtained Indonesian citizenship as a child living in Indonesia, or after reaching adulthood)?

Is Obama’s allegation that some companies are “technically renouncing their U.S. citizenship” a projection combined with an unconscious confession?

Does Obama consider his (possible) renunciation of U.S. citizenship to be a mere technicality? Therefore, does he believe that it’s “wrong” to use such a technicality to disqualify him from the presidency? Knowing how Obama’s mind works, as evidenced by his own words, this hypothesis seems increasingly likely.

Is Obama, therefore, a “deserter”, too? Someone who deserted his birth country in favor of foreign citizenship? Or is Obama subconsciously referring to his parents here?

Obama’s purported parents, Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, might both be labeled deserters.

Stanley Ann Dunham sent her son to Hawaii to be raised by her own mother, when he was only ten years old. She remained in Indonesia for most of the rest of her life. Thus, she deserted both son and country.

Barack Hussein Obama spent perhaps a month with his young son, when he visited him in Hawaii in late 1971. Other than that single short visit, the man immortalized in Obama’s book never lived a day with his son. Therefore, Obama Sr. was a deserter of the first degree.

Dr. Hodges has written a book about Obama, The Obama Confession: Secret Fear. Secret Fury.

There remains enough material out there for an entire bookshelf full of psychoanalyses of Barry Soetoro, or an extensive video library (h/t Papoose):

 #####