The Invasion of the UACs (Unaccompanied Alien Children)

Illegal alien crossing

Our Independence Day celebrations were deliberately disrupted and dampened by numerous discouraging stories about the invasion of our country by hordes of “unaccompanied alien children”. These “children”, most of whom consist of young men in their late teens, are illegally entering our country after traversing at least a thousand miles of the deserts of Mexico, a country which seems to be doing nada to stop them. Hundreds of the “unaccompanied” are age two or younger. Imagine them crawling or toddling across the border!

The difference between how these illegal interlopers are treated by our government versus how U.S. citizens are treated by our government is stark. Here’s one example of the difference in justice:

State social services and police officials are investigating after a toddler was found wandering around outside at an apartment complex … wearing nothing but a turtleneck, one sock and a diaper. …

The child’s mother [not an illegal alien] was inside their apartment, sleeping. Police arrested her

Here’s another:

Twice in two months, the same 2-year-old boy was found wandering on the same busy, four-lane road … wearing only a soiled diaper. …

When a man stopped to help the child Friday in the intersection of Airline Drive and North 9th Street, the toddler pointed to a nearby home and said, “Mommy.” The boy told the same thing to a sheriff’s deputy who found him darting across that intersection

The boy was unharmed, but sheriff’s officials have now locked up both parents [who are not illegal aliens]. …

U.S. citizen parents are subject to arrest if they lose track of their children for a short period of time and leave them “unaccompanied” outside of their homes.

So two U.S. citizen parents were arrested when their child was found “darting across” an intersection. Yet what happens to the parents of unaccompanied illegal alien children who are found “darting across” the U.S. border after having somehow trekked or been schlepped across at least a thousand miles of the country of Mexico? Nothing, apparently.

In fact, at taxpayer expense, they’re being fed, clothed, treated medically, provided lawyers, and then flown or bused across the U.S. to be “reunited” with their parents or relatives, if any can be found here. Will these families reimburse the taxpayers? Doubtful. Will anybody even ask or expect them to?

Another U.S. citizen mother was arrested after her child was found outside their apartment. Yet what happens to illegal aliens parents whose kids are caught at the border and who currently reside illegally within the USA (taking jobs from U.S. citizens and/or illegally receiving social benefits provided by U.S. citizens)? Nothing, apparently. They are not arrested for their own crime of being here illegally nor for

(1) negligently leaving their children behind in their home countries under the questionable guardianship of those who then allow the children to risk their lives by traveling “unaccompanied” across hundreds of miles of desert to illegally enter a sovereign country; or for

(2) conspiring to commit a crime by sending money to be used to pay coyotes (soliciting a crime, aiding and abetting a crime) or to provide transportation costs so that their children will be sent “unaccompanied” across hundreds of miles of desert to illegally enter a sovereign country; or for

(3) negligently giving their children the money and/or permission to go trekking unaccompanied across hundreds of miles of desert to illegally enter a sovereign country, thereby risking their lives.

Are these not examples of more serious negligence than falling asleep and losing track of a child who finds his way outside in his diaper? Are these not heinous crimes?

Is paying a coyote to illegally smuggle a child into another country a crime in the same way that providing funds to terrorists makes one complicit in the crimes the terrorists then commit? The answer should be a resounding YES.

Why, then, are the parents of these unaccompanied illegal alien children being rewarded instead of arrested? Why do they receive “compassion” and understanding when citizen parents do not (especially Christian parents)?

The Obama administration is rewarding illegal alien parents by not only allowing the parents to stay here illegally but also by “reuniting” them with their children who have just committed another crime!

These unaccompanied ALIEN children can get asylum (or argue for it) by claiming that one parent abandoned them, which is why there are so many “families” arriving with only one parent.

Yet, in this country, it’s almost the norm (at least in some groups) to have only one parent, something which the progressive left applauds, because they see the nuclear family as evil. Why, then, is being abandoned by one parent grounds for getting asylum in the USA, when it seems to be perfectly okay for U.S. citizens to “abandon” their children in actuality, or by never having been present in their children’s lives in the first place?

If the “unaccompanied alien child” dies along the way, like the Guatemalan boy profiled in this story, then are the child’s parents not arguably responsible for at least manslaughter or negligent homicide? I’ll leave it to the lawyers amongst us to decide the exact terminology for the crime, but if these parents were negligent U.S.-citizen parents, then I’m sure Eric Holder’s DOJ would come up with some crime with which to charge them, especially if the parents were not “persons of color”.  Here are a few facts from that sad story:

  • The “child” was either 11 or 15.
  • His brother also came here illegally, lives here illegally, and works here illegally.
  • This child wanted to come here to work to make money to pay for health care for his mother’s epilepsy, so he was not a victim of drug cartels, violence, or human traffickers. He would not have been a valid seeker of asylum.
  • His home village is not victimized by drugs or violence.
  • His parents are very, very poor, and yet …
  • His parents paid $5400 for his passage and then handed him over, willingly, to a “coyote”. Therefore, he wasn’t unaccompanied. One has to wonder how much health care that $5400 would buy as well as who or what was the source of so much money for this impoverished family. How much food would that money have bought for a family that “never” has “enough” food? From whom did they “borrow” all this money?
  • He got to the U.S. border on a bus, so Mexico could have, should have, interdicted him at some point along the way. How did he get across the southern Mexican border?

Wouldn’t it be more truly compassionate for the Obama administration to heavily lean on the government of Mexico to encourage them to stop these unaccompanied illegal alien children at their own southern border?

How much aid do we sent to Mexico every year? For that matter, how much aid do we send the Central American countries who are dumping their impoverished citizens on us? Can we charge them back for the resources we spent on their citizens? Congress should stop all aid to every one of these countries until they put an end to this illegal invasion of our country.

Wouldn’t it be more truly compassionate to build the border fence that we’ve been told is already complete so that no unaccompanied illegal alien child will be able to get across and so that word of mouth will prevent any others from even trying, thus saving lives?

Let’s have a look at how the U.S. government treats U.S. citizens. This image comes from the Cliven Bundy “standoff“:

If only illegal aliens were “greeted” the same way–with snipers and dogs and armored SUVs–then illegal aliens might reconsider crossing our border illegally. And so would potential TERRORISTS.

If over 50,000 unaccompanied alien “children” have crossed our borders, then how many terrorists did the Obama administration similarly let in? It’s worse than that, however:

As federal officials have begun to send the expected 240,000 migrants and 52,000 unaccompanied minors who have crossed the border illegally in recent months in the Rio Grande Valley to cities around the county, Murrieta so far is the only place that has managed to turn them away … 

So, to sum up, 292,000 illegal aliens have flooded into the United States just since April. (Which is a rate of almost 100,000 a month.) And 85% of them have been released into the US. And we are supposed to believe it is all Bush’s fault.

For the record, the law The Times is blaming on Bush is the ‘Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2008.’  which is simply a ‘renewal’ of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, which was passed under and signed by Bill Clinton. It offers protections for persons in the country illegally who may be victims of human trafficking.

The Obama administration, after deliberately choosing to flout border enforcement and immigration law, now has dug up a 2008 law, signed by President George W. Bush (but originally attributed to Bill Clinton) that they claim does not allow them to send these unaccompanied illegal alien children home, based upon the technicality that their home countries are not “contiguous” with the USA. Since when does the Obama administration care about following the letter or even the spirit of any law?

Ever helpful, the New York Times and other mainstream media are more than happy to pass along this specious rationale to help cover for Obama’s mendacity.

The law in question seems to not apply to illegal aliens who come here for economic reasons, such as to work, or even to join their illegal alien relatives who preceded them. The law is the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, which concerns victims of human trafficking, not illegal alien border-crossers.

This link provides us with a definition of human trafficking, courtesy of the United States Department of State:

What is the definition of human trafficking under U.S. federal law?

The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA) defines “severe forms of human trafficking” as: The recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for

  • sex trafficking in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age; or
  • labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery.

Coercion includes threats of physical or psychological harm to children and/or their families. Any child (under the age of 18) engaged in commercial sex is a victim of trafficking.

The TVPA is the law that was reauthorized by the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, so it would seem obvious that the reauthorization refers to trafficking victims in the same way as did the original bill.

I leave it up to the lawyers amongst us to explain whether or not illegal alien children who come here from non-contiguous countries for economic reasons, or simply to join their illegal alien families, can be defined as trafficking victims and so fall under the protection of this law. The definition provided by the Dept. of State would seem to exclude them. They are not victims of sex trafficking or enslavement.

Obama is sworn to protect and defend the United States of America. When will he begin to do so? Some dictators do know how to protect their countries:

Saudi Arabia has placed 30,000 soldiers on its northern border after 2,500 Iraqi soldiers reportedly quit their posts, leaving the country open to the threat of a lightning advance by ISIS militants.

King Abdullah ordered all necessary measures to protect the kingdom against potential ‘terrorist threats’ as the possibility of ISIS taking yet more territory in the Middle East appeared to increase.

We learned recently that the Obama administration doesn’t want the Border Patrol to tell the people of the USA the TRUTH, which is that nobody is patrolling or controlling the border. Our employees are under a gag order to hide the truth from us.

U.S. citizens of all colors are opposed to this illegal alien invasion. The opposition has nothing to do with the race of the interlopers. Almost half the population of Murrieta, CA, consists of “persons of color”, and many of its citizens, regardless of their race, are adamantly opposed to allowing the illegal aliens to stay.

Because Obama will not enforce the law and protect the U.S. from invasion, Sarah Palin, among others, is calling for him to be impeached. If he is not impeached and if Congress does nothing to stop this manufactured crisis at our southern border, then how much more chaos will Obama create within the USA over the next two years?

At a rate of 100,000 illegal aliens per month, how many more millions of illegal aliens will break into our country to overwhelm our systems by the time Obama’s presidency is over?

By then, his “fundamental transformation” of the United States may be complete.

#####

181 responses to “The Invasion of the UACs (Unaccompanied Alien Children)

  1. NO Agents Securing the Southern Borders…. CAN’t say A WORD!!!

    A GAG… = A NOOSE? ORDER?… Who will STOP ~ OBAMA ?

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/07/07/Border-Patrol-Union-Official-Under-Gag-Order-Says-No-Agents-Securing-Border

    • • Reply•Share › ….. Avatar …. Elston Gunn • a day ago

      Sarah Knows what she is Doing, she is playing Chess while others are
      just trying to play Checkers! Sarah Palin see moves way ahead in the road. Sarah knows it will never pass, but she has a motive! YES SHE DOES!!!!

  2. Some videos pertinent to the topic. First, an ex-Marine, ex-Border Patrol agent speaks out:

  3. Todd Starnes reports the facts from the border:

  4. EVEN Bill O’Really gets in on the act:

  5. Thank you, Kev, for liking the post. I’m always amazed by how some posts get unexpected (at least by me) attention from new friends.

  6. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-California/2014/07/08/Pro-Amnesty-Protest-Would-Obama-Send-His-Kids-Back-to-Kenya
    This is funny. Apparently the pro-amnesty folks have the idea that Obama’s from Kenya.

    “Would President Obama do that to his own children? Would he do that to his father’s family from Africa? Would he send his nieces and nephews back to Kenya?”

    We already know the answer to that one. No, he won’t send his illegal alien relatives back to Kenya. They got their amnesty. If that medic speaking out is still in the military, whatever became of the rule that they’re not supposed to politic in uniform?

  7. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/07/08/internal-executive-summary-confirms-at-least-16-unaccompanied-minors-in-nogales-are-ms13-members-n1860014

    ” An internal Border Patrol executive summary obtained by Townhall confirms that at least 16 unaccompanied illegal minors (those under the age of 18, according to U.S. government policy), are members of the brutal El Salvadorian street gang Mara Salvatrucha—or MS-13.

    Gang members left graffiti on the walls of the Nogales Border Patrol processing center, which suggested they had ties to the organization. …

    “But remember, this is a ‘humanitarian crisis.’ They are just kids,” a source working in the Nogales processing center said in frustrated and sarcastic tone. “They are MS-13 gang members. They’ve done everything from torture to murder. They act as teenage ‘enforcers.'” ”

    Is this one of the “children”?

    “But remember, this is a ‘humanitarian crisis.’ They are just kids,” a source working in the Nogales processing center said in frustrated and sarcastic tone. “They are MS-13 gang members. They’ve done everything from torture to murder. They act as teenage ‘enforcers.'”

    http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/07/08/Sheriff-Feds-Releasing-Criminals-Deported-10-15-Times-into-Arizona

    “On Tuesday’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto” on the Fox News Channel, Pinal County, AZ Sheriff Paul Babeu reported that the federal government has released criminal illegal aliens into his community and that his officers have arrested individuals who have already been deported 10 or 15 times. He said “[the federal government] has released dangerous violent criminals right in my county and they refuse to give me the names of these criminals, and that there are “cartel scouts…ushering the drugs through all the way up to Phoenix” within the county. Babeu added, “We have a guy just yesterday we arrested and everyday 10 times deported, 15 times deported, because there are no consequences for breaking the law.””

    btw, first Barry wanted Congress to give him 2 BILLION, now he wasnt 3.7 BILLION DOLLARS.

  8. Papoose | July 2, 2014 at 6:27 pm | Reply

    I pray for this Patriot’s safety and hope this information goes viral.
    It only has 152 views.

    Published on Jun 30, 2014
    Recorded at Center for Security Policy’s National Security Group Lunch on Capitol Hill on Friday, 27 June, 2014

    Rosemary Jenks, Director of Government Relations, NumbersUSA.

    Topic: Southern Border Crisis: National Security Implications

    I N V A S I O N by the hand of the President of the United States

    Now E X T O R T I O N by the same hand.

  9. just how cool can one man B???? not much really O’ SKIPS the
    BORDER….. how sweet of him… LIKE NOTHING is GOING ON???

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2014/07/07/obama-skips-border-raises-money-machete

  10. Rosemary Woodhouse

    From POtuS

  11. Rosemary Woodhouse

    New bridge…..You’re a Mexican. You’re a Mexican You’re a Mexican….

    • Now the obot in charge of the “refugee” resettlement tells us that “Jesus was a refugee.” They do love their snark. (As if these people are Christians who know all about Jesus.)

      The invaders are illegal aliens, not REFUGEES. There is no war in their countries. But y’all know that. Barry is a liar who will twist and distort the law and laugh in everyone’s faces as he does it. “Sue me.” That’s his response.

      • http://www.rescue.org/ten-refugees-one-journey-eskinder-negash
        The ORR head. https://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/tag/eskinder-negash/

        Here are some numbers one should get firmly planted in one’s mind (that applies to me as well!) when people ask you how many refugees are there. Here is what Negash says the ORR “serves:”

        ….with the United States welcoming refugees from 65 countries across the globe this past year. The highest number of overseas arrivals represented a slight switch from those of the past few years, with nearly 19,500 Iraqi refugee admissions and 16,300 Burmese refugees accounting for more than half of all refugee arrivals. They were followed by Bhutanese (9,100), Somali (7,600) and Cuban refugees (4,200), with Iran, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sudan, Eritrea and Ethiopia rounding out rest of the top ten admissions groups in FY2013.

        The overall population served by ORR and its partners, however, grew to a projected 143,000 new arrivals in Fiscal Year 2013, including almost 72,000 refugees and Special Immigrant Visa holders, an estimated 46,000 asylees and Cuban/Haitian Entrants and Parolees; more than 500 Victims of Trafficking, and nearly 25,000 Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC).

        And yippee, in the very next paragraph he says they are almost all on a path to citizenship and VOTING! Those unaccompanied kids as well!

        The numbers only tell part of the story: most of the 143,000 people ORR served last year are on a path to U.S. citizenship that began the day they arrived. Former refugees, asylees, and UAC are making positive changes in communities across the country—and will continue to do so throughout their lives—opening businesses, buying homes and raising families, and voting (and running!) in local elections.

        I often say that we take 70,000 refugees a year on average, but I think we need to follow Negash’s lead and start using a number twice that—143,000 a year arriving in the US and in need of “services” you, the taxpayers, are providing. …”

        First we have the UACs. Next up, the LGBT “community”. Q’s, too? http://www.acf.hhs.gov/press/lgbt-refugees-6-15-2011

        ““As many of these refugees left their homelands specifically because of persecution related to their LGBT status, it is particularly incumbent on us to provide a safe and welcoming environment,” Hansell added.

        The current resettlement network has limited understanding of the LGBT community,” said ORR Director Eskinder Negash. In addition, no information exists in the context of available resource materials specifically for LGBT refugees. The need for these services is critical to ensure their successful resettlement in the U.S.

        Heartland Alliance has taken the lead in promoting education, awareness and resources in support to resettlement for LGBT refugees, and has developed a great deal of expertise in this area,” said Negash. “Furthermore, their focus on treatment of survivors of torture has well positioned Heartland to develop materials and resources that will be adapted to the specific needs of the LGBT refugee population.”

        ORR is founded on the belief that newly arriving refugees have inherent capabilities when given opportunities. ORR provides refugees with critical resources to assist them in becoming integrated members of American society.”

        Christian? LGBT? Is he or is he not?

        There’s a website devoted to watching the ORR:

        “Seven years ago it came to our attention in Washington County MD that a non-profit group (Virginia Council of Churches) had been bringing refugees into the city of Hagerstown (county seat) for a couple of years. Some problems arose and citizens started to take an interest and ask questions about how this federal program works. Our local paper had no interest in finding the facts, so we decided to find them ourselves.

        One of the many startling things we found out about this very quiet effort is that these non-profit groups bring to the US on average each year 15,000 (FY90-FY03) Muslim refugees from the Middle East, Africa, the Balkans, etc, almost completely funded by the US Government through grants and contracts to these non-government agencies. Of the 168 refugees brought to our county since 2004, 125 are Muslim. Although we all have sympathy for persecuted and suffering people there are real questions to be answered about the wisdom of this policy.

        It turns out that there are hotbeds of this refugee resettlement controversy throughout the US. We have identified some of those. Because the issue is much more complicated than we initially realized, we have set up this online community organizing center at http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/ . …

        And, it makes no sense to bring in tens of thousands of refugees and place them on welfare and other public assistance either. Unless of course you are a proponent of the Cloward-Piven/Alinsky strategy of bringing about crisis to crash our form of government. As a matter of fact, I have joked previously that if the refugees came to the US and all registered as Republicans, this program would end overnight!”

      • I wish I’d found this site before I wrote the post. Check out their most recent post about the UN attempt to redefine “refugee” to include the MILLIONS who can claim they are fleeing from “crime” or poverty. This, as I said and the writer said, is Barry’s “fundamental transformation”: http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/2014/07/08/unhcr-not-letting-a-good-crisis-go-to-waste-big-push-to-change-definition-of-a-refugee/

        “Here is the definition of a refugee as updated in 1967 (from the original 1951 UN Convention):

        “A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence as a result of such events, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it..”[8]

        Do you see anything in there about wars, violence or natural disasters? Refugees and asylum seekers are supposed to be able to prove they are being persecuted! Economic migrants and people who claim they are fleeing crime are not refugees!
        Obama said he would transform America. Well this is it folks! This is the big move and the dumb Republicans in Washington apparently can’t see it!

        Ah, but many of them are complicit, too. Their homepage is here: http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com/

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        Jesus was the biblically prophesied Messiah/Moshiach” who was rejected by his own. He was NOT a refugee” (as I know you’re aware)

        refugee |ˌrefyo͝oˈjē, ˈrefyo͝oˌjē|
        noun
        a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster: tens of thousands of refugees fled their homes | [ as modifier ] : a refugee camp.

        Jesus preached throughout Israel and died in Israel. May He come quickly.

  12. Excellent post Miri. This is treason beyond pale by this administration, abetting illegals to invade the US. The Homeland Security buses are transporting the illegals INTO the USA! This administration ARE the coyote’s wouldn’t it seem?

    Let’s say i’m just talking out loud here,

    1) “The Homeland Security buses are transporting the illegals INTO the USA” Under the Obama Administration.

    Who are the complicit in these actions? WHY all the sudden the “surge” in illegals coming across the border? What are the motives, the out come?

    2) Stanley A. Dunham worked on foreign MICRO-LOANS for the Ford Foundation along with Geithner who worked for the United States Secretary of the Treasury under Obama from 2009 to 2013. He was previously the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2003 to 2009.

    3) The Ford Foundation has for years financed and pushed for illegal immigration. Ford’s larger role as the central funder of the open borders lobby, and the architect of many of its radical agendas, and has granted millions of tax-exempt dollars to terrorist support groups and other radical organizations in the Middle East.

    Now, if you have time please read this excellent archived article from January 21, 2004 FrontPageMagazine.com it’s in two parts but an excellent read and may help many understand what is happening now and why, motives, and a final outcome.

    The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation’s Security After 9/11

    Forward – by David Horowitz

    There are few issues so important to the life of a nation as the integrity of its borders and the nature of its citizenship. These are issues that define its identity and shape its future. When a nation is at war, moreover, its ability to regulate and control its borders is a security matter of paramount importance.

    The following text by William Hawkins and Erin Anderson describes how America’s borders have been under assault for forty years with consequences that are measurable and disturbing. The assault has been led by an open borders lobby that is sophisticated and powerful. Many of its components, moreover, have a history of antagonism to American purposes and a record of active support for America’s enemies. Its funders are multi-billion dollar entities, who are unaccountable and unscrutinized. They have more discretionary incomes at their disposal to influence these issues than is possessed by either political party, or any business group, or even the federal government itself.

    As Hawkins and Anderson show, the open borders campaign was already instrumental in damaging the nation’s ability to defend itself before 9/11. Yet not even this terrible event has caused its activists to have second thoughts, or tempered their reckless attacks. Instead, the open borders lobby has expanded its efforts to eliminate America’s border controls to include the active defense of terrorists and terrorist organizations and a continuing assault on the very policies the federal government has adopted to defend its citizens from terrorist attacks.

    A Ford Foundation newsletter the authors cite features an interview with Georgetown law professor David Cole, a leading academic figure in the open borders campaign, who has written a book attacking America’s immigration laws and their protections against terrorist groups. In the interview, Cole denounces, “the criminalization of what the government calls material support for terrorist organizations. This is a practice that was introduced … through the immigration law, … It criminalizes any support of any blacklisted terrorist organization without regard to whether one’s support actually had any connection whatsoever to terrorist activity that the group undertakes.”

    The Ford Foundation interview with Cole was published with hindsight in September 2003, ten years after the first World Trade Center bombing and two years after the September 11 attack. As Hawkins and Anderson point out, the anti-terrorist law which Professor Cole is denouncing was introduced as legislation and passed during the Clinton Administration in response to the first World Trade Center bombing and other terrorist plots. It was a bi-partisan effort to put a check on terrorist support groups that were using use the liberties afforded by the American legal system to aid and abet terrorist activities. Shortly after the interview with Cole appeared, it was revealed that the Ford Foundation had granted millions of tax-exempt dollars to terrorist support groups and other radical organizations in the Middle East.[1]

    The Ford Foundation’s sponsorship of Professor Cole in underwriting his book and promoting his conclusions is but a reflection of Ford’s larger role as the central funder of the open borders lobby, and the architect of many of its radical agendas. Elsewhere in their text Hawkins and Anderson describe how this $11 billion leviathan took a small civil rights group called the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund which was based in San Antonio Texas, poured more than $30 million into its treasury, revamped its political agendas, moved its offices to Washington and turned it into one of the largest and most powerful proponents of radical immigration change in the nation.
    Snip~
    Finally, Hawkins and Anderson show how thoroughly the Ford-funded open borders network is integrated with the traditional American left, including its factions from the old Communist movement. Most prominent among these organizations and a strategic player in the open borders network is the National Lawyers Guild, which began as a Soviet front and has continued its “revolutionary” allegiances since the fall of the Berlin Wall. Today its most celebrated and admired member – as well as one of its chief causes – is attorney Lynne Stewart, who is under federal indictment for aiding and abetting the terrorist activities of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, the leader of group that bombed the World Trade Center in 1993.

    Cont’s @ Link –

    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=14499

    ___________________________
    Part two refers to the laws you mention above in you post Miri. But I’ve snipped the article to point out whats posted below from a section of the article.

    The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation’s Security After 9/11, Part Two

    Thursday, January 22, 2004

    Immigrant Legal Resource Center

    Snip ~

    In 1979 the Immigrant Legal Resource Center began as a group of volunteer attorneys and law students active in left-wing causes in the San Francisco Bay Area. Responding to the wave of refugees fleeing “war and repression” in Central America in the 1980s, the ILRC joined the sanctuary movement and sought to establish legal precedents in political asylum law. The ILRC claims to have helped make the immigration amnesty program work for three million people.[17]

    Though the sanctuary movement has faded from public memory it is still very much alive in left-wing mythology. The sanctuary movement attempted to reverse the political dynamics of the Cold War which the left saw as being heavily influenced by an influx of refugees fleeing Communist tyranny from Cuba, Vietnam, Laos and Eastern Europe. The sanctuary movement opened the door in the 1980s to an influx of refugees from the failed Communist movements in Central America, in particular from El Salvador and Guatemala. The sanctuary movement was closely tied to leftist support for the communist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua.

    The movement faded away after Violeta Barrios de Chamorro’s victory over the Sandinista dictatorship in the Nicaraguan elections of February 1990. The elections were forced on the Sandinista junta by U.S. diplomatic pressure and the anti-communist Contra guerrilla movement. The collapse of the Soviet Union also removed vital economic and military support for communist insurgency and radical regimes in Central America, leading to their collapse as they lacked an adequate domestic base. Yet, American leftists still cherish their part in the struggle to bring communism to Central America, and to bring a flock of refugees into the United States to help transform American politics and foreign policy.

    ILRC still pursues this issue, working under the 1997 Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act for which it had lobbied. The problem as ILRC sees it is that “tens of thousands of Salvadoran and Guatemalan refugees applied for asylum in the U.S. but, because of bias against them at the time, very few of those petitions were granted. This situation has resulted in a continuing problem: a large number of refugees from these countries reside in the U.S. to this day without permission to remain permanently.” ILRC wants to fully legalize and enfranchise these left-overs from the civil wars of 20 years ago. The logic is the same as James D. Cockcroft’s – it will enlarge the recruitment pool for the political left.

    The end of the Cold War did not change the worldview of any of the ILRC’s staff. On the first anniversary of the September 11 attacks, executive director Susan B. Lyndon issued a statement that is still the first thing a visitor to the ILRC’s website sees. “Twelve months after terrorism struck on U.S. soil, I’m sobered to find myself living in a country that feels less than American to me,” complained Lyndon. Among the evils she saw being enacted in the name of national security “Proposed rules that would require immigrants (from Muslim countries only) to check themselves into police stations. An initiative to proactively hunt down people (once again from Muslim countries only) with outstanding deportation orders for immigration violations. Even a proposal to enlist citizen spies as informers against neighbors they suspect to be terrorists. From my standpoint as a civil rights advocate, these measures are unconstitutional.”

    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=14478

    • And then we have REV. JEREMIAH WRIGHT Obama’s long time mentor that adds a connection/s? –

      The Real Story Behind Rev. Wright’s Controversial Black Liberation Theology Doctrine

      May 05, 2008

      Snip~
      HANNITY (voice-over): It started during the 1960s in Latin America. “Liberation theology” is a Christian school of thought that sees Jesus not just as a redeemer, but as a liberator of the oppressed. It is often cited as being a form of “Christian socialism” since it mixes politic and religion. This is where the problems lie. The principle criticism of liberation theology is its embrace of Marxism. Pope Benedict XVI, while he was still a cardinal, strongly opposed radical liberation theology. In fact, the Vatican twice condemned the liberationists’ acceptance of Marxism and violence, but just how does this relate to black liberation theology?

      Reverend Jeremiah Wright often refers to liberation theology when trying to explain his church’s teachings.
      Snip~
      SCHENCK: I was actually the only person escorted to Dr. Wright. He asked to see me, and I simply welcomed him to Washington, and then I said Dr. Wright, I want to bring you a warning: your embrace of Marxist liberation theology. It is contrary to the Gospel, and you need, sir, to abandon it. And at that he dropped the handshake and made it clear that he was not in the mood to dialogue on that point.

      HANNITY: It seems that Jeremiah Wright does not want to have a friendly dialogue on the matter or answer critics’ concerns, but it does not matter. Wright’s actions explain just how controversial his church really is.

      WRIGHT: Our congregation stood in solidarity with the peasants in El Salvador and Nicaragua while our government through Ollie North and the Iran-Contra scandal were supporting the contras who were killing the peasants and the Miskatow Indians in those two countries.

      JOSE DIAZ-BALART, TELEMUNDO NETWORK: Liberation theology in Nicaragua in the mid-1980’s was a pro-Sandinista, pro-Marxist, anti-U.S., anti-Catholic Church movement. That’s it. No ifs, ands, or buts.

      His church apparently supported, in the mid-’80s in Nicaragua, groups that supported the Sandinista dictatorships and that were opposed to the Contras whose reason for being was calling for elections. That’s all I know. I was there.

      HANNITY: Jose Diaz-Balart of the Telemundo Network was stationed in El Salvador and Nicaragua as a war correspondent at the time.

      DIAZ-BALART: I saw the churches in Nicaragua that he spoke of, and the churches were churches that talked about the need for violent revolution and I remember clearly one of the major churches in Managua where the altar Jesus Christ on the altar was not Jesus Christ, he was a Sandinista soldier, and the priests talked about the corruption of the West, talked about the need for revolution everywhere, and talked about “the evil empire” which was the United States of America.

      HANNITY: These were the people Reverend Jeremiah Wright and his church were supporting? The more we learn about Reverend Jeremiah Wright the more controversial he gets, and the question remains — what else will be uncovered?

      http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/05/05/real-story-behind-rev-wright-controversial-black-liberation-theology-doctrine/

      • Senator Tom Harkin; Once Bitten Twice Duped

        February 8, 2014

        If Justin Beiber had returned from Cuba smitten with its healthcare and calling it “awesome!” most Americans would understand. But Iowa Senator and Obamacare champion Tom Harkin serves as chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. He just returned from an official tour of Stalinist Cuba hailing its healthcare as “quite remarkable.”

        “Cuba’s a poor country,” he marveled. “But they have a lower child mortality rate than us….their public health system is quite remarkable.”

        What Senator Harkin actually believes to be true or “quite remarkable” might be (implicitly) worthy of emulation. If so, this would affect the lives of millions of Americans. After all, Senator Harkin is still a few months away from retirement and still banging the drums deafeningly for Obamacare from his chairman’s seat.

        It’s an old story with this Senator, actually. In April 1985 while president Reagan sought to aid Nicaragua’s desperate anti-communist guerrillas, freshman Senators Tom Harkin and John Kerry visited Nicaragua, met with the Sandinista (communist) leaders and returned smitten with their dedication to democracy and their enmity towards the Soviets. President Reagan’s obsession with Central American communism and his aid to the Contras was a manifestation of simple “Mc McCarthyism,” sneered the freshman Democratic Senators. The proof was in a “peace-proposal” signed by Sandinista leader and Castro-protégé Daniel Ortega that Kerry and Harkin “held in their hands” (Neville Chamberlain, anyone?) and read convincingly to Congress. Its purpose was to kill President Reagan’s Contra-aid bill.

        It worked like a charm. The U.S. Congress swallowed the Communist scam hook, line and sinker and killed the President’s bill. Then exactly three days later a snickering Daniel Ortega was in Moscow, flouting his Soviet ties for all the world to see. The Castro-protégé returned to Managua with a $200 million Soviet aid package, along with a bigger pledge of arms and Cuban advisors to crush the Contras.

        http://townhall.com/columnists/humbertofontova/2014/02/08/senator-tom-harkin-once-bitten-twice-duped-n1790732

      • Thanks for all this, Leza. That refugee watch blog I linked above points out the connection between the MONEY and all the “not for profit” and religious organizations that are in the resettling business. And then, of course, there are the political reasons for wanting to increase the numbers of leftists, commies, and muslims in this country.

        • Your Very welcome Miri. I’ll check out the blog your referring too. ty for the head’s up. Soro’s, is listed in one the links of the frontpage links I posted as one of the big money supporter’s, of course! Absolutely no surprise there.

          • They remind me of the movie Alien. As if there’s a huge, many-tentacled PARASITE infecting our Republic. They’re EVERYWHERE, even within the mainstream churches. It’s not only the Baptists and Catholics, it’s also the Lutherans. I read that the ORR has a budget of nearly a billion dollars. Add the $2 billion Barry asked for (for “housing and feeding” the “refugees”) and this means that ORR’s budget will TRIPLE. Imagine the POWER that $3 BILLION per year will hand to these bureaucrats (all of whom are leftists, if not muslims and commies) because they can use ALL THIS MONEY to subvert, woo, and corrupt the churches by dangling that carrot of MONEY in their faces and providing them the cover of being “humanitarian”, and “compassionate”, and “Christian”. Infiltration. TAQIYYA. And the useful idiots BITE. Will Congress be SO STUPID as to hand him this money? He claims he will use half of it to enforce the border, but he also already claimed that he secured the border and that the fence is built. Yet somehow, these toddlers get in anyway.

      • Meet New York City’s Marxist Power Couple

        October 16, 2013

        “De Blasio opens up to Baldwin” is how MSNBC described Alec Baldwin’s show with New York City’s Obama-backed Democratic “progressive” mayoral candidate, Bill De Blasio. “I was an early supporter of de Blasio’s,” Baldwin acknowledged.

        Having been a virtual arm of the Obama White House for years, MSNBC is now turning into an arm of the de Blasio campaign. De Blasio, a former aide to socialist New York City Mayor David Dinkins, faces law-and-order Republican candidate Joe Lhota on November 5.

        De Blasio’s support for communist regimes in Cuba and Nicaragua, and his embrace of Islam as an emerging political force, were highlighted in a recent New York Times article. The paper also noted his illegal “honeymoon” to Communist Cuba. However, the mysterious trip occurred in either 1991 or 1994, depending on which paper you read; and much about the nature of the travel remains unknown.

        Our review of documents concerning de Blasio’s involvement in the communist-front Nicaragua Solidarity Network confirms that notes of one meeting in 1991 say that he stated that Islam was an emerging “power,” and wondered if there were “progressive elements” in Islam “we can work with.”

        Marxists like de Blasio who were sympathetic to the Sandinista “liberation” struggle in Nicaragua were typically active in support of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), a Soviet/Cuban-backed terrorist group. Indeed, anti-Israel and pro-PLO material was found in the archives of the Nicaragua Solidarity Network.

        Another document regarding the “vision” of the group says “End world capitalism and replace it,” and next to de Blasio’s initials are the words “democratic socialism.”

        Baldwin’s comments during his MSNBC de Blasio interview included such observations as, “You seem to have a very warm positive healthy home life.” De Blasio, who is white, married a black woman and former lesbian, Chirlane McCray; they have two children together.

        http://www.westernjournalism.com/meet-new-york-citys-marxist-power-couple/

  13. COMING TO AMERICA

    Arabic diary found near border
    Couple discovers book in backpack dropped on their property

    Published: 02/13/2003

    An Arizona couple has discovered a diary written in Arabic in a backpack apparently dropped on their property by an illegal alien entering the U.S., reports the Sierra Vista Herald Review.

    According to the report, Walter Kolbe was chasing some wild animals away from his home last week when he stumbled upon the backpack – not an unusual occurrence on his property since it includes a path routinely used by illegal aliens coming from Mexico. He brought it home but did not immediately open it.

    After going away for the weekend, Kolbe’s wife, May, looked in the backpack and discovered the diary.

    “I found it (the backpack) about a hundred yards from the house, near a barbed-wire fence,” Mr. Kolbe told the Herald Review. “I was just going to throw it in the trash.”

    According to Mrs. Kolbe, most of the writing was in Arabic, though there was some Spanish writing in it as well.

    Looking through the small book, according to the report, she noticed two names and telephone numbers – one listing in Canada and the other Iran – and confirmed the beginning numbers were the international codes for those two countries.

    Mr. Kolbe alerted the FBI, which sent an agent to pick up the diary and backpack on Tuesday.

    Kolbe is the brother of Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., in whose congressional district he lives.

    The Kolbes said they wonder how many Middle Eastern people are coming into the United States illegally, the Herald Review reported.

    Rob Daniels, a spokesman for the U.S. Border Patrol’s Tucson Sector, told the paper he is not allowed to talk about the number of non-Mexicans his agency detains.

    “We can’t get into specifics about the number,” Daniels said.

    According to the report, a spokesman for the U.S. Border Patrol in Washington, D.C., said 99.4 percent of the 955,310 people apprehended by the agency from Oct. 1, 2001, through Sept. 30, 2002, were from the Americas, which includes Canada, Mexico and other Central and South American nations. The remainder comes from 140 countries.

    “Because of 9-11 there has been restrictions and guidelines when talking about special-interest countries,” the spokesman told the paper.

    The decision not to be specific about how many people come from the Middle East is a directive of the Joint Terrorism Task Force, he said.

    As WorldNetDaily reported in 2001, there have been increasing numbers of Arabs coming into the U.S. via Mexico. Border Patrol spokesperson Rene Noriega told WND that the number of other-than-Mexican detentions has grown by 42 percent. Most of the non-Mexican migrants are from El Salvador and other parts of Central America, she said, but added that agents have picked up people from all over the world, including the former Soviet Union, Asia and the Middle East.

    According to the San Diego Union-Tribune, hours after the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, an anonymous caller led Mexican immigration agents to 41 undocumented Iraqis waiting to cross into the United States.

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2003/02/17261/#vC7UfX6JxbtYU2fX.99

  14. COMING TO AMERICA

    ‘Arab terrorists’ crossing border

    Middle Eastern illegals find easy entrance into U.S. from Mexico

    Published: 10/19/2001

    COCHISE COUNTY, Ariz. — The U.S.-Mexican border here is the most heavily used corridor for illegal alien traffic on America’s southern boundary. With its difficult topography that is folded, creased and convoluted, it is a land that yields well to smuggling. The Huachuca, Chiricahua, Dragoon and Whetstone Mountains are riddled with hundreds of deep canyons, caves and arroyos that offer superb concealment for the hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens that annually cross here.

    The numbers of unauthorized immigrants smuggled across this porous border dumbfound the imagination. To date, the U.S. Border Patrol has apprehended 158,782 illegals in 2001. By the Border Patrol’s own admission, it catches one alien in five, and admits that around 800,000 have slipped across the U.S. line this year. The local ranchers, who have been watching the border for several generations, strongly disagree. They contend the agency only nets one in 10, and estimate that in 2001 over 1.5 million unlawful immigrants have crossed into America in what the Border Patrol calls the Tucson Sector.
    Snip~
    As one agent who spoke anonymously said, “Look, I can tell you a lot of stories, but I have to remain unnamed or I will be blackballed and might lose my job.” Then, worriedly, he added, “I have a family depending on me.”

    Another agent, of supervisory rank, stated, “The smuggling traffic of Mexicans has really slowed. We are experiencing a tremendous increase in OTMs” – border lingo for “other than Mexicans.” When queried about the ethnic make up of the OTMs, he answered, “Central and South Americans, Orientals and Middle-Easterners.” Middle-Easterners? “Yeah, it varies, but about one in every 10 that we catch, is from a country like Yemen or Egypt.”

    Border Patrol spokesperson Rene Noriega stated that the number of other-than-Mexican detentions has grown by 42 percent. Most of the non-Mexican migrants are from El Salvador and other parts of Central America, she said, but added that agents have picked up people from all over the world, including the former Soviet Union, Asia and the Middle East.

    Arabs have been reported crossing the Arizona border for an unknown period. Border rancher George Morgan encounters thousands of illegals crossing his ranch on a well-used trail. He relates a holiday event: “It was Thanksgiving 1998, and I stepped outside my house and there were over a hundred ‘crossers’ in my yard. Damnedest bunch of illegals I ever saw. All of them were wearing black pants, white shirts and string ties. Maybe they were hoping to blend in,” he chuckled. “They took off, I called the Border Patrol, and a while later, an agent, Dan Green, let me know that they had caught them. He said that they were all Iranians.”

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2001/10/11341/#FA4CfmzdD5myhsxU.99

  15. I was going over some of our past Muslim Brotherhood post and had forgotten completely about this old post posted by newssleuth. The CIA connection from many years past.

    The Muslim Brotherhood, Nazis and Al-Qaeda

    https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/03/11/the-muslim-brotherhood-nazis-and-al-qaeda/

    It reminded me of some research I had just done recently, the subud CIA Kent connection.

    https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2014/06/13/flag-day-and-weekend-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-149670

    And then it reminded me of Soro’s –

    EXCERPT “60 Minutes:” Soros admits he helped in the confiscation of Jewish properties

    On Dec. 20, 1998, in the midst of his murderous speculative rampage against the currencies of Malaysia, Indonesia, South Korea, and other targeted Asian nations, George Soros appeared on CBS-TV’s “60 Minutes,” to explain and defend his behavior. Confronted by interviewer Steve Kroft about his experiences as a youth in Hungary, under the Nazi occupation, Soros freely admitted that he posed as the “adopted godson” of an official of the Nazi-occupation government, and helped in the confiscation of Jewish properties.

    “Kroft: And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.

    “Soros: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that’s when my character was made.

    “Kroft: In what way?

    “Soros: That one should think ahead. One should understand and anticipate events and when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a very personal experience of evil.

    “Kroft: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

    “Soros: Yes. Yes.

    “Kroft: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. “Soros: Yes. That’s right. Yes.

    “Kroft: I mean that’s–that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

    “Soros: Not–not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t–you don’t see the connection. But it was–it created no–no problem at all.

    “Kroft: No feeling of guilt?

    “Soros: No.

    “Kroft: For example that, `I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that?

    “Soros: Well, of course I could be on the other side, or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. I had no role in taking away the property. So I had no sense of guilt.”

    In an earlier television interview on the same subject, Soros was even more blunt about his role as a Nazi collaborator in the Holocaust. On April 15, 1993, Soros appeared on WNET-TV and declared, “When the Germans came in,” his father explained to him that, “This is a lawless occupation. The normal rules don’t apply. You have to forget how you behave in a normal society. This is an abnormal situation. And he [Soros’s father] arranged for all of us to have false papers, everybody had a different arrangement. I was adopted by an official of the ministry of agriculture, whose job was to take over Jewish properties, so I actually went with him and we took possession of these large estates. That was my identity. So it’s a strange, very strange life. I was 14 at the time.”

    Post 8 @ this link –

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2369866/posts

    [Videos] George Soros Interview. Explains How The ‘New World Order’ Of Finance Will Work.

    10/24/09

    I found this recent interview of globalist George Soros discussing the new “financial new world order.”

    He goes into why he thinks the dollar has to be put aside as the major currency used and how China must be involved. He describes the way the ”new world order” will have operate.

    Here are a couple choice quotes from Soros. The video is 10 minutes long so there are plenty more:

    “China will emerge as the mortar replacing the U.S. consumer.”

    “China will be the engine driving it forward. The U.S. will be a drag with the decline of the dollar.”
    __________________________________________

    And really, do we really honestly believe Mark after 9-11 suddenly just decided one day to move too China?

    Not I.

  16. HOW MANY BENEFITS FOR U.S. CITIZENS WILL $3.8 BILLION BUY? How many student loans for U.S. citizens could it subsidize? How much training or re-training for UNEMPLOYED CITIZENS would it buy? How many prescription drugs for U.S. CITIZEN SENIORS would it buy? It’s a lot of money. WHY are we to spend it on ILLEGAL ALIENS who broke our laws?

    btw, Barry ADDED the $1.8 billion to his previous $2 billion request AFTER the pro-amnesty (illegal alien) activists leaned on him after he said he would fast track sending the illegals back home. http://news.yahoo.com/ap-sources-obama-backs-off-border-policy-changes-221247259–politics.html

  17. http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/18650-obama-admin-blames-bush-era-law-for-failure-to-deport-illegals

    Story notes that the law passed in 2008 didn’t result in any huge influx of UACs UNTIL after 2012, when Barry illegally allowed “Dreamers” to stay. They note that the point of the Wilberforce Act was to prevent kids who were being trafficked for sex or slave purposes from being sent back to the very people who basically sold them into sex or indentured slavery (like their negligent parents). It probably exempted Mexicans and Canadians because they were assumed to be economic interlopers. Who knows?

  18. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/09/obama-administration-s-record-human-trafficking-issues

    READ THIS ONE!! He’s bragging about his accomplishments and PLANS for combating human trafficking and it includes reauthorizing (last year!) the very law that he blames BUSH for causing the influx of UACs that he claims he can’t deport on account of BUSH.

  19. The law they blame on Bush was written by BIDEN! http://immigrationreform.com/2014/07/08/congress-must-demand-policy-changes-in-exchange-for-releasing-border-funds-to-obama/

    “… The problem has been exacerbated by the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, known as the TVPRA. That law — authored in the Senate by now Vice President Joe Biden, and long advocated by Senator Dianne Feinstein — requires the government to place illegal alien minors from Central America in formal removal proceedings instead of quickly returning them to their home, as the law allows with respect to minors from Mexico. The process takes years, and more often results in the illegal alien minors staying in the U.S. rather than being removed to their home countries. …”

    No wonder he knows all about it and how to blame it on GWB. Can you believe this? Krauthammer’s take on it:

    “The law was passed in ’08, yes in the Bush administration, yes unanimously,” Krauthammer said. “But it was intended for sex trafficking. It was intended for small numbers of kids and it made a lot of sense. It was never intended for a mass influx, a mass immigration. And people are yelling you are inhumane to return them. Well that’s exactly what the law is for Mexicans or Canadians. So, if it’s inhumane why haven’t we heard a protest about the return of kids who come in from Mexico? It was intended for something else. Obama is clearly making the statement indirectly by that story you just gave from AP and through his Homeland Security secretary who refused to answer about deportation, that he’s opening the doors of America to this influx. It will double, it will triple.”

    Here’s BARRY’S PLAN:

    Click to access FederalHumanTraffickingStrategicPlan.pdf

    After labeling all these illegal alien children as “victims of trafficking” or “refugees”. Whatever works.

  20. These are worth the time, but skip the first 20 seconds of each:

  21. http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-tries-to-blame-biden-illegal-aliens-loophole-on-bush#.U713ciXb4u4

    Another post I wish I’d found before writing mine. This says it ALL:

    “… You see? It’s all Bush’s fault. We knew the media would finally find a way to pin it on him.

    “This is a piece of legislation we’re very proud to sign,” a White House spokesman, Tony Fratto, told reporters on Dec. 23, 2008, as the president put his pen to the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, named for a 19th-century British abolitionist…

    Now the legislation, enacted quietly during the transition to the Obama administration, is at the root of the potentially calamitous flow of unaccompanied minors to the nation’s southern border.

    In reality, this was not a new law at all. This was a ‘renewal’ of a law that was signed by Bill Clinton, the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000. Which was to provide protections for persons in the country illegally who may be victims of human trafficking.

    The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act has been subsequently renewed in 2003, 2006, 2008 and most recently in 2013, as an amendment to the Violence Against Women Act. [SO OBAMA RENEWED THE LAW THAT HE’S BLAMING FOR THE CRISIS; HE COULD HAVE VETOED IT.]

    In fact, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 was sponsored by then Senator Joe Biden. It carefully added the loophole that prevents illegal alien children from non-contiguous countries from being quickly immediately deported.

    The ‘renewal’ of the act in 2013, the Violence Against Women Act, introduced similar loopholes for women who were victims of domestic violence. It was also championed by Joe Biden.

    So now we are being flooded with children who are claiming to have been victims of sex trafficking and women who are claiming to be victims of domestic violence. We are supposed to believe that these 50,000 kids are all the victims of sex trafficking. That the 250,000 illegal adult women — are all victims of domestic violence.

    Originally pushed by a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers as well as by evangelical groups to combat sex trafficking, the bill gave substantial new protections to children entering the country alone who were not from Mexico or Canada by prohibiting them from being quickly sent back to their country of origin.

    Funny how the NYT neglects to mention that this bill was sponsored and championed by then Senator Joe Biden. In fact, this is one of the feathers in Joe’s cap.

    Instead, it required that they be given an opportunity to appear at an immigration hearing and consult with an advocate, and it recommended that they have access to counsel. It also required that they be turned over to the care of the Department of Health and Human Services, and the agency was directed to place the minor “in the least restrictive setting that is in the best interest of the child” and to explore reuniting those children with family members.

    The Obama administration says the law is partly responsible for tying its hands in dealing with the current influx of children.

    As if Obama has any problems ignoring or even changing a law that doesn’t suit him, via his phone and pen.

    Officials have suggested that the White House might seek flexibility in the law’s requirements when it asks Congress to provide emergency funds to contend with the latest immigration crisis, a request that could come as early as Tuesday…

    In other words, Obama pretended he was going to do something to change this law, in order to get his $2 billion from Congress. But he has already reneged on that promise. …’

  22. The White House requested that “RICK PERRY”… meet Obama on the Tarmac Wednesday as he “GETS-OFF” …Air Force One on his way to Democratic FundRaisers $ in Texas $ which could have created another Tableau LIKE the “Chris Christie HUG” during Superstorm Sandy, which Helped … Obama in the 2012 election. >>But Perry wasn’t having IT.<>>> ?

    • She can’t drive it in DC for another year, until she’s 17. Even then, will there then be a motorcade of 20 identical cars, with 19 full of SECRET SERVICE personnel, every time she goes to the mall with her friends?

  23. Eskinder Negsh ….finger in the O’…. pot since … 2009

    http://www.acf.hhs.gov/about/leadership/eskinder-negash

  24. PREY-ING on your Guilts… in hopes you will FALL .. HOOK LINE
    & “STINKER” as were already pretty …. SUNK! ~ BIBLE? TALK?
    Jesus talk? YEP! … thinking they GREASE US GOOD! .. NOT SO !
    the answer is NO …STOP them from coming IN! Just STOP IT simple.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/top-obama-official-defends-open-borders-tells-conference-jesus-was-a-refugee/

    • yeah, and Jesus wasn’t welcome in Jerusalem either, and look where that got him. THe God and Jesus argument just don’t get it at all. Seems like God and Israel are the preconditions for why we have territories in the first place directing us to have protected sovereign lands and rights . Lucky for Jesus he had God on his side, not humans,or else he’d have rotted away like the rest of the folks that ventured there under Rome’s laws and unless they went by Rome’s laws they were thrown out or killed. Jesus wasn’t a refugee running from anywhere anyway.

    • I got it. Let’s move Obama to Guantanimo, where he can busy himself all day at the prison sport facilities, move all these false refugees to the whitehouse. THere’s lots of empty rooms at the whitehouse and healthy food with a veggie garden. ANd probably great health care there. THey can wait there till being deported….which could likely speed things up. Maybe senators can get a better look and a few pictures of the little toddlers with their teenage brothers and sisters and mothers and fathers and gang members. Since our administration is the likely culprit along with Soros, in soliciting these poor innocent people to the US it’s only appropriate the administration should take them in an own up to the responsibility. Yeah, that’s the ticket, but if the white house fills up the rest could go to Guantanimo with O. …..seems that facility is becoming vacant as well.

  25. Joseph Morgan Margaret Lauer • 3 hours ago …@ glen beck
    Why not deport ASAP? Or set up temporary camps at the border so Individuals may contribute to religious & other charities to help arriving migrants & move them back to central America. This migration is not a Moral Obligation like admitting South Vietnamese refugees or Jews fleeing the Holocaust or the Soviet Union. Red Cross, not Homeland Security should handle the camps at the border. This type of foreign Hispanic demographic invasion should not be Imposed on US taxpayers. If they
    don’t like Honduras, let them go to Guatemala or vice versa but not to
    invade & change the USA…. BUTT’ WHAT DOES ‘IT MATTER’ NOW?

    • Yep, YEP, and YeP

    • I had some thoughts this morning, when the lamestream dutifully reported that “most” of the unaccompanied alien “children” are escaping drug violence. Immediately, I thought:
      1. Couldn’t they find refuge a little CLOSER to Central America? How about just staying in Mexico?
      2. Why aren’t we seeing a similar exodus from inner city Chicago to Central America? Or even just to Ontario? Or Rockford, South Bend, Madison?

      Have you been hearing the sound bites from Barry? Do the people who voted for him enjoy having Eddie Haskell, an ultimate smart ass if not an arrested-development sociopath, as president?

      • Miri, I was thinking the same thing. Refugees usually take refuge in the nearest country, no?
        And, this thought hit me too…one of my favorite shows is House Hunters International on HGTV. It baffles me personally, but there seem to be a LOT of US/Canadian families (the people on the show always seem to be hooking up with a significant ex-pat community) who choose to move to places like Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Guatemala, etc with their CHILDREN for some (misguided in my opinion, but still…) notion of a better life. These are people who have the resources to buy a house and support themselves but they are choosing THESE locations. HOW bad can it be?

        • It’s getting even worse. The presidents of Guatemala and Mexico have completed a pact wherein people crossing Mexico as “migrants” will be give Mexican papers/documents allowing them to be in the country of Mexico for 72 hours. They will even in some cases get MONEY to help them “transit” the country. This blog reported it as an ACT OF WAR against the U.S. by our southern “neighbors”: http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/07/09/act-of-war-on-america-mexico-and-guatemala-sign-agreement-to-fast-track-invasion-of-u-s/

          A Monday joint press conference was held by Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto and Guatemalan president Otto Perez Molina to announce their agreement to jointly cooperate in and facilitate the invasion of their northern neighbor, the United States.

          Labeled “The Southern Border Program to Improve Passage,” it is an officially-sanctioned, coordinated effort on the part of Mexico and the nations of Central America to invade the United States. [And I’ll bet that Barry and Biden facilitated this agreement.]

          The agreement provides a network of border checkpoints through which an internal Mexican travel document will be issued, which is valid for a period of 72 hours. That document, known as a Regional Visitor’s Card, will provide temporary legal status to those in Mexico illegally for the sole purpose of invading the United States.

          The announcement, officially granting the “privileges” to illegals from Guatemala and Belize, is expected to be applied to anyone who reaches the southern Mexican border with the intention of invading America.

          Additionally, this action even provides special protections as well as financial assistance to unaccompanied minors.

          This will only provide further incentive for the illegal occupation and serve to dispel any misguided belief on the part of foreign nationals in Central America that claims made by the United States that they will be deported back home are anything other than falsehoods intended to pacify the gullible American public. …”

          Now, if you click the link to the news article, you get the story in Spanish. http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/nacion-mexico/2014/impreso/mexico-y-guatemala-protegeran-a-migrantes-216921.html#1 COINCIDENTALLY, I cannot right click or use CTL C to copy the text so that I can translate the story into English to read it at the source. My Spanish is okay but not great and this requires understanding every nuance. Ya think that news site has disabled right click to protect their copyright or to hide the TRUTH from the English-speaking U.S. population?

          Gordo, if you’re lurking, is there a fix for when sites disable copying and pasting?

          IF “migrants” show up at the U.S. border with these temporary travel papers, will the Border Patrol just let them in? MORE INVASION OF OUR COUNTRY AND BARRY LAUGHS AS HE REFUSES TO ENFORCE THE BORDER AND THE CONGRESS CONTINUES TO WORRY ABOUT THEMSELVES BEING BLAMED.

          IS the National Guard NOT the STATE MILITIA? WHY don’t the governors, as the commanders in chief of the National Guard, put them on the border THEMSELVES? IF Brewer and Perry and the others continue to allow this INVASION, then THEY are as guilty as Obama.

  26. And while everybody’s distracted by the fiasco at the border, it comes out that the IRS was using INSTANT MESSAGING and nobody saved the messages. Conveniently. And Koskinen had no clue there was such a system, nor, apparently, did the Inspector who allegedly looked into and reported to Congress on the issue. They found out about it within one of Lerner’s emails where she asks about how to evade Congressional subpoenas:

    “The latest emails suggest that IRS officials used a separate instant-messaging system whose contents also weren’t preserved.

    The emails raised new questions for some lawmakers about Ms. Lerner, the now-retired head of the IRS tax-exempt-organizations division who has become a focus of the inquiry. She wrote the emails to an IRS information technology official and the head of her division’s audit unit.

    “I was cautioning folks about email and how we have had several occasions where Congress has asked for emails and there has been an electronic search for responsive emails— so we need to be cautious about what we say in emails,” Ms. Lerner wrote. “Someone asked if [instant messaging] conversations were also searchable—. I don’t know, but told them I would get back to them. Do you know?” …”

    Is this not conspiracy to evade the spirit if not the intent of THE LAW? If this email conversation took place AFTER any member of Congress had asked about the IRS targeting Tea Partiers, then it at least suggests prior knowledge that certain items should be public record and that “spoliation” of EVIDENCE should not occur and just may be a CRIME. WHAT exactly could an honest and ethical employee and public servant need to be “cautious” about saying in email lest it be seen by a Congressperson? Unless they’re doing something illegal or unethical or POLITICAL, then what’s to worry? If they’re only doing their jobs as they’re supposed to do when using TAXPAYER-FUNDED RESOURCES, then what’s to worry about? Nobody in Congress gives a damn about, say, their dog going to the vet or a kid with a bad report card or anything else they might be saying in email or instant messaging. She knows the kind of thing that Congress WOULD be interested in and she’s deliberately, seemingly, trying to EVADE DISCLOSURE of the TRUTH. I found a link to the original WSJ story.

    • This took place in April 2013, so well after the IRS targeting was being investigated and also AFTER they’d already rather conveniently “lost” her emails from 2009-2011 or whatever that crucial period was. So this was just her attempt to ensure that from that clean slate forward, they make sure they don’t accidentally tip their hand and reveal what they were up to all along, imho. http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/07/lois-lerner-email-we-need-to-be-cautious-about-what-we-say-in-emails/

      • OMG, read the last email from Lerner at that link. After being told that instant messages ARE NOT part of the automatic saving but that someone would have to deliberately save the message to a file or email, Lerner replies, “PERFECT.” What’s perfect? Now she knows exactly how to use taxpayer resources to communicate with her pals in order to HIDE from CONGRESS, our representatives, what she and her pals are doing with OUR RESOURCES–using them to TARGET US. Ms. Maria Hooke, if she’s the one responsible for overseeing whatever system DOES automatically save and backup communications, would seem to be in trouble with her exchange because she’s admitting that they don’t save these messages, which obviously are the types of communications that MUST BE SAVED as public records and MUST BE AVAILABLE to the public and to Congress. She tells Lerner that employees “can” copy and save the messages, but doesn’t advise her that they SHOULD do so to comply with the LAW. Ms. Hooke should have immediately took steps to ensure that “OCS” messages ARE saved and backed up, in order to comply with the law. If you were a public servant and learned about such a loophole where compliance with a LAW was being overlooked, wouldn’t you have done something to rectify the situation? What steps did Hooke take to ensure that OCS messages were added to the automatic backups?

    • http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/initiatives/im-faq.html#record

      “Does IM content qualify as a Federal Record?

      The statutory definition of records (44 U.S.C. 3301) includes all machine readable materials made or received by an agency of the United States Government under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business. Agencies that allow IM traffic on their networks must recognize that such content may be a Federal record under that definition and must manage the records accordingly. The ephemeral nature of IM heightens the need for users to be aware that they may be creating records using this application, and to properly manage and preserve record content. Agency records management staff determine the record status of the IM content based on the overall records management policies and practices of their agency.

      How do I manage my IM content?

      Agencies developing a comprehensive policy need to ensure that IM content is managed consistently across the agency in its component offices. An effective policy addresses the authorized use of the IM technology and provides guidelines for the management of the records generated during an IM session. This is especially important because IM content may be subject to various types of access requests, including under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or as part of a discovery process in a litigation context.

      IM content that is a record must be managed as such. Here are two ways:

      Provide policies that inform users what steps to undertake to manage the content;
      or,
      Configure the IM client or server to capture IM without user intervention. [LERNER SHOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT IM ARE RECORDS UNDER THE LAW; OTHERWISE, THE IRS HAS A CRAPPY RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICY, SO HEADS SHOULD ROLL ON THAT JUST FOR THE SHEER INCOMPETENCY.]

      IM content that is a Federal record must be managed in conjunction with related records.

      What are the current best practices for capturing IM?

      Nearly all IM client software has the ability to capture the content [SO IT SHOULD BE PART OF THE SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY] as either a plain text file or in a format native to that client. Generally, the location and maximum size of that file is determined by a configuration setting in the client. DoD 5015.2 certified applications have the ability to capture and manage records in any electronic format. Such formats include those files produced by the various IM clients.

      In addition, various IM management products have the ability to address the monitoring and management of IM content, either from those clients that are part of the agency’s enterprise or the various public clients. Generally, these products operate at the server level and should be able to capture IM sessions regardless of the configuration of the individual client.

      Determining which solution is appropriate for your agency involves collaboration among the program staff, the information technology (IT) staff, the records management staff, and NARA. …”

      THEY’D BETTER SUBPOENA THE IT STAFF, THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT STAFF AND THE GUYS AT NARA, asap.

  27. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/382338/black-americans-true-casualties-amnesty-j-delgado

    A good article documenting how ALL of us, no matter our color, will suffer from this INVASION. When will EVERYBODY put an end to this insanity?

  28. O’…. 24/ 7 ….. some-body’s watching U !!! except “NOT THEM”

    http://news.yahoo.com/washington-pot-spokane-fired-132440333.html

  29. ….LOOK صاشفنننممممكنازززز صاشف ع اشرث يخىثزززززز ؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟ ,,,,,,,,

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/07/must-see-video-black-americans-confront-pro-illegal-immigrant-supporters-in-murrieta/

  30. ‘Death Train’ Derails in Mexico… @يقعيلث
    Stranding 1,300 Migrants Headed Toward USA…
    90,000 to cross by end of summer…
    PHOTOS: Obama Laughs His Way Through Border Meeting…
    Perry: ‘I Don’t Know’ if he heard me…
    Houston black woman goes on EPIC rant about illegals…
    VIDEO: African Americans Confront Immigrant Supporters…
    MAG: Amnesty disaster for black workers…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s