Obama Mystery Theater: Stanley Ann’s Passport Renewal of 1968 (Part Three)

SADSpassport1 - CopyClick to enlarge; then click again to enlarge further.

This is the third article in a series that looks at some passport records related to Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro (Ann), with special emphasis on an application she made to renew her passport in August 1968. In part two, we determined that it’s likely that Ann did have a passport that predated the passport she was renewing. Since her then-current passport was issued in July 1965, if she had a preexisting passport, then that passport may have been issued in July 1960, right after Ann allegedly graduated from high school and around the time that her family moved to Hawaii.  It’s also possible, however, that the earlier passport had been issued in July 1962, provided that she didn’t extend the expiration date for another two years.

We also looked more closely at instructions on the passport renewal form that required Ann to attach an explanation if any child included on her passport already, or to be included in the future, had naturalized in a foreign state, had sought or claimed the benefits of the nationality of a foreign state, or had formally renounced U.S. citizenship. We determined that at least one, if not all, of these criteria were met by her son Barry, particularly because he attended public school in Indonesia–something that required Indonesian citizenship. Thus Barry had sought and claimed benefits of Indonesian nationality.

It’s important to remember that dual citizenship was not allowed in Indonesia. At least one Indonesian informant stated that Barry would have been required to “revoke” his U.S. citizenship before he could attend school and that he also had to carry an SKBRI–an identity card for Indonesians of foreign descent, especially considering that he was listed at both schools as an Indonesian citizen. [Note: Since being cited in part two, the comment by “zhou tay” has been scrubbed.  This link currently contains a similar comment by “zhou tay”.]

Part two ended with a question:  Who is Soebarkah?  Next, we’ll try to figure out the answer to that question.

Proceeding with an in-depth analysis of the papers, look closely at the back side of Ann’s passport renewal application, which is seen at the top of this post. Under the section relating to Ann’s spouse, she wrote “Indo” where she was supposed to write the passport number belonging to her husband Lolo Soetoro. We can assume that Ann was indicating that Lolo had an Indonesian passport and that he was not included on her U.S. passport. Under the section relating to Ann’s children, she wrote two names:

Barack Hussein Obama and Soebarkah.

We can assume that Soebarkah is a name, because it was listed in the box for names, but also because when the word subarkah (the current spelling for soebarkah) is run through Google Translate, without indicating language and without capitalization, the program recognizes the Indonesian language and does not translate the meaning, but returns the word Subarkah, capitalized, as a proper noun. Subarkah, and its variant Soebarkah, are common Indonesian surnames. In fact, one of Suharto’s pallbearers was Lt. Colonel Asep Subarkah.

In 1972, Indonesia officially changed the spelling of the vowel sound from the Dutch oe to the Indonesian uWe have already observed that Ann used the surname Soetoro but later spelled it Sutoro. Soetoro was the Dutch spelling. Sutoro became the new Indonesian spelling. Similarly, what once was the country of Soematra is now Sumatra.

The instructions above that section of the form read,

AMEND TO INCLUDE (EXCLUDE) CHILDREN

In the boxes below, Ann was to list the names of the children to be included or excluded, each child’s current residence, and each child’s birthplace and birth date. She entered only the two names, Barack Hussein Obama and Soebarkah, the latter of which was written inside parentheses.

Then both names were crossed out. In other words, both names were “struck out.” Referring back to the front side of that same page, the following instructions applied if any child already included or to be included on her passport had naturalized in a foreign state, claimed benefits of foreign nationality, or renounced U.S. citizenship. If any of those stipulations applied to Ann

OR to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion which applies should be struck out

So what can we conclude from this?  Good question.

First, she did not sign or date the second page of the form, nor did any consular officer provide an opinion or signature. She listed names only, no residences, no birthplaces, no birth dates. A group photo is supposed to be attached, if there is a child or children included on the passport. There is no photo. No documentary evidence is listed as having been submitted, seen, or returned by any consular officer. Nothing indicates that the case was referred to the U.S. Department of State for some sort of action.

We’re going to assume that this page does indeed represent the reverse side of the renewal application of August 1968 because it is the second page of the similarly-identified form (Form 7-64 SS-299); it follows immediately after the first page of the same form; and it appears as if the person responding to the FOIA request numbered the individual papers in chronological order (P1, P2, P3, etc.), but only on the front side of each paper. In other words, the papers themselves were numbered and both sides were scanned, but the reverse sides were not hand-numbered. (See here, for clarification.)

This page of the application clearly indicates an attempt to renew and amend Ann’s passport. Did she in fact amend the passport? That is another mystery yet to be solved.

Perhaps for the purposes of a renewal and considering the instructions on the front of the page–which speak of striking out the “portion” that applies to a child under certain circumstances–her signature on the front side is sufficient to achieve the purpose of apprising the U.S. government of Barack/Soebarkah’s new status.

Consider again the title/instruction: Amend to include (exclude) children.
Does this mean that when a child is to be added to the passport, the child’s name is written in the box provided, along with other details (residence, birthplace, date of birth); but when a child already on the passport is to be excluded, then the child’s name is written within parentheses?

Others have assumed that the name Soebarkah was written in parentheses to explain or somehow indicate that Soebarkah was another surname for Barack Hussein Obama. In this scenario, the name Soebarkah was put in parentheses in the same way that one puts a woman’s maiden name in parentheses. For example, Stanley Ann (Dunham) Soetoro. In other words, the parentheses serve to indicate that what is inside is meant to supply more information or exists for the purpose of clarification. However, it may not be that simple.

Amend to include (exclude) children

Does the word exclude sit inside parentheses simply to clarify the title of that section, or is it in parentheses to illustrate how the names are to be listed on the form?

If the name is not in parentheses, then the intent is to INCLUDE that person.

If a name is within parentheses, then the intent is to EXCLUDE that person.

If that’s not the function of the parentheses, then where and how, on that form, would a parent indicate which person is to be included versus which person is to be excluded? Were the consular employees simply expected to deduce intent from what’s included within the rest of the file?

Did Ann write Barack Hussein Obama on the form to indicate a desire to include him on her passport? If so, then she should have included a photograph of him, with herself; but there’s no photo and nothing seems to indicate that any photo was ever stapled to the form.

Did Ann write Soebarkah on the form to indicate a desire to exclude him (or her) from her passport, which presupposes that a person by that name already is included on her passport?

By striking out the names, was Ann indicating that Barack Hussein Obama and/or Soebarkah had naturalized in Indonesia, accepted benefits of Indonesian nationality, and/or renounced U.S. citizenship? If so, then there ought to have been supporting documentation submitted to the consular office. So where is it?

If any explanation or supplementary information was supplied, it’s not indicated on the form itself, nor was any included in the release under the FOIA request. Was it withheld to protect the “privacy” of Barack Hussein Obama and/or Soebarkah? If so, then it seems that fact should be indicated in the letter to the requester, in the same way the letter “explained” the absence of any pre-1965 passport applications for Ann.

Note the date of that letter: July 29, 2010. Coincidentally, the letter sent in response to a FOIA request for Lolo Soetoro’s INS records, carried the same date (h/t Papoose), even though different government departments handled the requests, the requesters were different individuals, the cases had two different numbers, and the authors of the letters were different government officials. This certainly suggests coordination from a central location, perhaps through the White House, which required all requests concerning “White House equities” to come to them first. Note also that the letter about Ann’s passport refers to the renewal request of 1968 as an “amendment”, even though it’s clearly checked off as a renewal. Was that a Freudian slip?  What exactly was amended?

Was Barack Hussein Obama added to Ann’s passport and was Soebarkah excluded?

As it turns out, there’s disagreement in the literature over for how long a passport remained valid in the Sixties. One source said 5 years; another said 3 years with an option to renew for another 2 years. The latter appears to be the case. Passport laws were changed in 1959 and again on July 26, 1968; new rules went into effect 30 days after July 26, 1968, which may explain why Ann was renewing her passport and why the renewal extended the expiration date only until July 1970.

Were there two different children? Was Soebarkah on her passport prior to August 1968? Or was Ann trying to change the name of the child who was already on her passport to Barack Hussein Obama from Soebarkah? If so, then why? Was she beginning the initial stages of a plan to eventually send Barry to Hawaii to be reared by her mother, as Barack Hussein Obama?

Barry’s school records, the only records we have seen for him from his time in Indonesia, say that he went by the name Barry Soetoro, not Obama, not Soebarkah. So who is Soebarkah? Was Barry Soetoro also Soebarkah?

If so, that may explain why no photo was supplied–there was already one on file for him. Yet the instructions clearly state that photos must have been taken within 2 years of the application. If Barry was Soebarkah, and he was added to Ann’s passport at the time she originally obtained it, in July 1965, then their photo would be out of date by August 1968 and a new photo would be required, if she intended for him to remain on her passport under either name.

That is, unless other amendments to the passport were made and those records have been suppressed, without advising the public that documents were withheld by the government for privacy reasons (or because they were lost, or eaten by bugs, or ruined by floods, or destroyed, or “cauterized”).

Did Barry travel to Indonesia on his mother’s passport under the name Soebarkah? If Soebarkah was not Barry, then who was Soebarkah?

If Barry was not Soebarkah and if Barry did not travel to Indonesia on his mother’s passport under the name Barack Hussein Obama, then how did he get to Indonesia? If she was trying to add Barack Hussein Obama to her passport in August 1968, then he was not already on her passport at that time. So then who was Soebarkah, and was Soebarkah already on her passport?

Ann and Barry had arrived in Indonesia in October 1967, less than a year before Ann renewed her 1965 passport. On what passport did Barry travel to Indonesia?

Lolo Soetoro had his own passport, according to his wife’s renewal application–an Indonesian passport. If Barack Hussein Obama did not travel to Indonesia on his mother’s passport, then did he travel there on Lolo’s passport, as his son?

It seems unlikely that Barack Hussein Obama would be listed on Lolo’s passport. That’s not an Indonesian name and if Lolo adopted him, he would have likely given him an Indonesian name, such as Barry Soetoro or Soebarkah. (See part two for more details about these topics.)

Did Barry have his own passport? It seems unlikely, unless it was an Indonesian passport, perhaps a recently obtained one under the name Soebarkah (or Barry Soetoro).

There seems to be a consensus among some researchers (Chase, WND, e.g.) that Ann was seeking to exclude Barry (by any name) from her passport, which presupposes that he was already on her passport in August 1968 and probably traveled to Indonesia on that passport the year before.

If so, this raises the possibility that Ann was required to renew her passport–because of the changing law or because it would soon expire–but she couldn’t keep Barry on her passport because he had failed one or more of the tests listed above: He’d naturalized in Indonesia and/or renounced his U.S. citizenship, and he also may have claimed benefits of Indonesian nationality, depending upon whether or not his education at the Catholic school in 1968 was somehow sanctioned, funded, or overseen by the Indonesian government.

If all she was doing via this amendment was taking Barry (aka Soebarkah) off her passport, then there would be no need to provide a group photo. There would be no need, perhaps, to supply the residence, birthplace, or birth date. There may have been a requirement to submit documentation explaining why he was being dropped, but maybe not. Perhaps the requirement for the explanatory statement under oath applied only if the person was to remain on her passport. This act, however, would leave Barry without a passport upon which to travel; as we have seen, he traveled extensively, so we’re back to the question of what passport Barry used throughout his life when he traveled back and forth to Indonesia, to Kenya, to the UK, to Pakistan, to Paris, and elsewhere.

Some pro-Obama true believers point to a memo in Lolo Soetoro’s INS records (p. 48) in which officials questioned Barry’s citizenship status and asked for clarification of Barry’s precise relationship to Lolo. Officials apparently determined (somehow) that Barry was a U.S. citizen (at that time) and was technically considered to be Lolo’s stepson because Lolo was married to Barry’s mother. A marriage certificate was included, but there was no document within the released file, such as a birth certificate, that explains how officials decided that Barry was born in Hawaii, and so, on that basis alone, was a U.S. citizen. His mother’s citizenship was not mentioned as a factor to qualify Barry as a U.S. citizen.

Pro-Obama true believers postulate that in August 1968, Ann must have been removing Barry from her passport so that he could obtain his very own U.S. passport. In this scenario, Barry was not adopted by Lolo, despite that his own half-sister at least implied that her father did adopt Barry, although under Indonesian law.

Actually, the situation is much more complex than that. To tease the truth out of all the threads in this tangled web requires knowledge of some factors that to date remain unknown to the public. There are many more questions that remain to be answered:

Did Ann and Lolo register their U.S. marriage by reporting “the marriage to the Civil Registration Office (Kantor Catatan Sipil) in Indonesia?”

Did Ann and Lolo marry again in Indonesia, perhaps under Islamic law? If so, did Ann officially convert to Islam?

In practice, it has been reported that the law and administrative processes make it difficult to register an inter-religious marriage [in Indonesia]. Couples may therefore choose to marry overseas or one party may decide to convert to the religion of the other.

Note that this article refers to the Indonesian law of 1974. Prior to 1974, marriage law in Indonesia fell under the Indonesian Civil Code of 1847. With regard to marriages abroad, that law stated that such marriages were valid provided that

within one year after the return of the spouses to Indonesia, the marriage certificate, executed abroad, shall be copied in the public marriage register of their place of domicile …

and provided that the marriage met other stated criteria, among which was this rule:

A woman may not enter into a new marriage earlier than three hundred days following the dissolution of the previous marriage.

Does that provision help explain the discrepancy in the reported date of Ann’s marriage to Lolo: 1964 versus 1965?

The Indonesian government expected a foreign marriage to be registered within one year of a couple relocating to Indonesia. Ann and Barry joined Lolo in Oct. 1967. In August 1968, almost a year after her arrival, Ann renewed her U.S. passport and may have removed Barry from it, very likely because he was now, according to his school records, a citizen of Indonesia and was either added to his father’s passport (Lolo’s) or he received his own Indonesian passport.

Did Ann use the name Soebarkah when she excluded Barry from her passport, because Indonesian records referred to him by his new Indonesian name, Soebarkah, but on her passport he was listed as Barack Hussein Obama? Or was Barry already listed on her passport as Soebarkah, and she wanted to remove Soebarkah and re-add him as Barack Hussein Obama? If so, then there should be more documentation in that file than has been released.

Did Lolo legitimate Barry, in Hawaii or in Indonesia (or both), as his son? Did Lolo “acknowledge” Barry as his son, whether or not it’s true? Keep in mind that when Lolo and Ann divorced, Barry, although over the age of 18, was listed as a dependent of the marriage; in particular, Lolo, as well as Ann, was responsible for Barry’s education. Was Barry’s birth certificate amended in Hawaii to name Lolo as his father? With regard to legitimacy of a child, the 1847 code said that

no one can dispute the status held by an individual pursuant to his birth certificate. …

Children conceived outside marriage, with the exception of those who have been conceived in an adulterous or incestuous relationship, shall be legitimized by the ensuing marriage of their father and mother, if the latter-mentioned have acknowledged them legally prior to the concluding of the marriage, or if the acknowledgment took place at the time of execution of the marriage certificate. …

If the parents, prior to or at the time of entering into the marriage, fail to acknowledge their natural children, they may subsequently reverse their position by letter of legitimization, granted by the Governor General, following the advice issued by the [Indonesian] Supreme Court.

Again, is the discrepancy in the reported date of the Soetoro marriage possibly explained by the above provisions? Could there be a marriage certificate from Indonesia? A letter of legitimization?

Exactly what Indonesian documents were allegedly purchased, for archival purposes, by Rep. Faleomavaega before the election of 2008? What “embarrassing” information had to be “cauterized” from Barry’s passport files?

Did the Indonesian government officially change Barry’s name to Soetoro (or Soebarkah) on Lolo’s passport or on any Indonesian passport Barry might have had?

The Indonesian Immigration Office is the only authorized government agency with the authority to change a name in a[n Indonesian] passport.

How did Ann, without a job, assure the Indonesian government that she was capable of supporting herself and her child while living in Indonesia? In the absence of a job and with Lolo telling U.S. officials that his income was insufficient, how did Ann assure the Indonesian government that she and Barry would be provided for? Did Lolo’s family supply

a third party letter guaranteeing to support the applicant financially during his/her stay in Indonesia, together with documentary evidence to do so?

What kind of Indonesian visa did Ann and Barry use when they traveled to Indonesia (social visit, tourist, or limited stay/temporary resident under Lolo’s sponsorship)?

According to Lolo’s INS files, in Oct. 1967, Ann was trying to obtain a visa to travel to Indonesia. About four months before, Ann had finally changed the name on her passport to Stanley Ann Soetoro. Why did she wait two years to change to her married name, and why did she change it just as she was preparing to join Lolo in Indonesia and seeking a visa from the Indonesian government for herself and her son?

Granted, some of the information cited above comes from current law and/or concerns British/Indonesian marriages. However, there’s no reason to believe that Indonesian law under Suharto’s police state would have been less stringent. If nothing else, the British articles illustrate the kind of hoops people must jump through when they enter into a “mixed marriage” with an Indonesian citizen.

We know from Barry’s memoir that he and his mother remained in Hawaii for a year after Lolo returned home to Indonesia. During that time, and for months prior, both Lolo and Ann were desperately trying to convince U.S. authorities to waive the requirement that Lolo return home for two years before being allowed to re-enter the USA. Thus, when Barry wrote in his book that he and his mother were waiting for over a year for immunizations and passports, he may not have known the whole truth.

In fact, Lolo and Ann did not want to live in Indonesia, at least not at that time. By reading between the lines of Lolo’s INS records, it’s possible to deduce that Lolo and Ann were keeping all their options open, however.

When Lolo was refused the waiver, Ann very suddenly departed for Indonesia, presumably with Barry. The U.S. government seemed to not know that she had left the country, because they continued to try to contact her in Hawaii. Ann and Lolo must have planned well for the possibility that the waiver would be refused.

Ann and Barry needed an Indonesian visa to enter that country. This article explains that obtaining an Indonesian temporary resident visa

can take a considerable length of time to process … and there is a lot of documentation to provide and process.

Perhaps that’s the long wait that Barry remembered, and he didn’t know or was too young to remember that Lolo wanted to return to the USA.

Another facet of Indonesian law may have played a role in Ann’s decision to send Barry back to Hawaii around 1971. This article contains a short summary of the history of marriage law in Indonesia. If Ann had become an Indonesian citizen, converted to Islam, and married (or remarried) Lolo in a Muslim religious ceremony to grease the skids for an easier life in Indonesia, and if Lolo had adopted or legitimated Barry as his son, then the following excerpt may later have become very important to her thinking:

[U]nder Shafi Islamic law the provisions on child custody generally favour women until the children are considered to be adults, which is around their twelfth birthday …

As an American woman, Ann may have understandably been very reluctant to lose complete custody of her son to Lolo.

So where does all this information leave us? We cannot definitively say, without more evidence, who Soebarkah was. There are people still living who would know and perhaps would explain who Soebarkah was, if any unbiased and responsible member of the media, or any of the many Obama family biographers, would simply ask. So far as I know, no authorized biography has as yet tried to explain or even mentioned Soebarkah.

The bottom line is that Barry, as a child, could not be held responsible for any acts of his parents, guardians, grandparents, or step-parent(s). He can, however, be held responsible for his own actions. If as a child Barry renounced his U.S. citizenship, then he would be ineligible for the presidency of the USA, perhaps even if he revoked that act by age 18.

If Barry ever entered or left the USA on a foreign passport; if he attended college in the USA as a foreign student using benefits obtained as a foreign student; if he did not register for the draft because he claimed foreign citizenship; or if he ever renewed any foreign passport (Indonesian or Kenyan, e.g.) after the age of majority, then he would (arguably in some instances) be ineligible for the presidency.

Will We the People of the United States of America ever learn the answers to all these questions?  Perhaps a more important question to ask is:

Why did the media and our so-called representatives in Washington DC fail us so miserably by not asking these questions of candidate Obama?

#####

195 responses to “Obama Mystery Theater: Stanley Ann’s Passport Renewal of 1968 (Part Three)

  1. New post. Another long one. Thoughts?

  2. What is troubling in this, is “Maya Soetoro” knows very well what this
    all means & she has been covering all of this up as a co conspirator.

    • Could be or maybe not. This was all over by the time she was born, and she wouldn’t have become aware of most anything until at least 1976 or so. By then her dad was pretty much out of the picture. Unless she heard gossip from her dad’s family, what would she really know of how it went down? But she does apparently know about the adoption, because otherwise, she’d just say he wasn’t adopted. By leaving open the possibility and arguing the law, it sort of gives it away that at least in Indonesia, Barry was adopted by Lolo.

      • The child was putting up with this crap for at least 10 years. She arrived in Hawaii in 1971 and needed an exception to gain entry into America. Her baby would have been one year and 2 months old by 10/21/71.

        My question is who is the imPOSter in the Oval Office?

        Did he steal their story?

        Who registered for the Selective Service in July 1980? It surely wasn’t a child.

        Maya is complicit.

      • Stanley the Woman was in Hawaii in 1972 – 1975, as one story had her employed at the Bishop Museum as a “craft instructor”. 1976 whereabouts unknown. Her 15 year old son was living with his Grandparents according to the “friends” at the elite academy. She has a passport request to visit America for one month in June of 1976. And then back to the National Museum of Jakarta in March of 1977 for 2-3 months which includes stints as “faculty of economics @ the University if Indonesia where she developed and taught a economic class. So much for her child’s development.

        And then in Yogykarta at the Office of Internaional Labor in June of 1977.

        She breaks my brain.

        Deceit runs in their genes. If they had an honest bone in them there would be no need for the labryrinth.

    • According to the barky’s application to to be admitted to the bar in Illinois he is clueless as to what all his other names were.

      He was known by no other names. “None”.

      Soebarkah… it has a such a familiar ring to it.

      Barry of Soetoro comes to mind. But you know me, I have such a wild imagination.

      • sorry, but the Soebarka (son of Soetoro) is not even close to correct. If anything comes close, it would be that Soebarka is the single name that Barry has somewhere on an Indonesian birth certificate. Many indos go by a single name. Soe is just a Dutch prefix for a Javanese name as is Su . They evolved and changed at given times in the history of Indo. Barkah could be for Barry, but in Indo…if Barry were his name it would likely be Barry on a legal passport….so this too is probably nothing to do with the Barry /Soebarkah name. If Barry were the son of Soetoro….using Soetoro’s surname appropriately would have been Soetoroputra or Soetoroputri. There’s plenty of proof that I am right.

        • That Subarkah guy who was a pall bearer for Suharto–he rose to be a brigadier general in their Army. He was a big shot, big shot. His family is huge and some of them bear a striking resemblance to certain persons who were raised, of course, in the royal compound in a royal manner by Soetoro, who was at the command and disposal of the Indonesian gummint, as we have seen.

  3. SOETORO.. SOEBARKAH.. what ever?.. click Topics & Keywords +

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2728155/posts

  4. That was a pretty exhaustive exploration of the Soebarkah notation. Given the historical context, the simplest, most logical explanation is that Stanley Ann was dropping him from her US passport because he had been naturalized as Indonesian citizen (with a new legal name of Soebarkah) at some point after their arrival in OCT 67. I’ve read from several sources that Muslim Indonesians generally had “one word” legal names at the time. This passport renewal application was an official / legal document. I don’t see her listing an Indonesian AKA for her son (and excluding him from her passport) without a compelling reason to do so. The only plausible reason that I can come up with is his Indonesian naturalization. La Porta witnessed the renewal. It is hard to believe that no journalist has ever shown him the renewal application and asked him why Stanley Ann was listing her son’s name as Soebarkah.

    • For the most part I agree with you. Then, abstractly, I think yeah, sure, because I highly doubt that he born was BHO II and so they made up the page 2 entry.

      If he was actually born BHO II on 8/4/1961 in Hawaii there would be no need for the bogus LFBC as well as the COLB released in 2008.

      Nevertheless, this human is not a full blooded American Citizen and therefore, not eligible to be a candidate for POTUS. He’s a white American according to the narrative and a foreign Kenyan. Bottom line Africa is a Continent and not a nation. A misnomer on all fronts.

      just sayin’

    • You’re correct about the 1-word names. Also that it’s an official document that one doesn’t sign lightly without being truthful. So what can we take from that? It’s somebody’s name. There’s a lot about the Obamanation that we find hard to believe. The lamestream media are like those monkeys–see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil, ask no evil. Like lawyers who shouldn’t ask a question they don’t know the answer to, except with the “journalists” they probably don’t know BUTT do FEAR the truth, so they don’t go looking for it.

  5. By 1968, the future president had moved to Indonesia with his mother & stepfather, & his mother listed him on the passport application as “Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah).”
    The “Soebarkah” has never been well explained, but it may be a compound name Soe-Bar-kah suggesting that “Bar” as in “Barry” has been adopted by “Soe,” as in “Soetoro.”
    There is one other bit of evidence to consider.

  6. Shrimpton again: http://www.wnd.com/2014/04/obamas-origins-resurface-at-intel-experts-trial/?cat_orig=politics

    “… Shrimpton contends to this day that the CIA collected DNA from then-Sen. Obama and a grandparent, establishing that Stanley Ann Dunham was not Obama’s biological mother. … [In which case, maybe Soebarkah was a foundling discovered by Lolo during his mapping trip to Papua and Ann’s the one who adopted him.]

    Meanwhile, Shrimpton has been indicted for having telephoned in 2012 the secretary of state for defense in London and declaring that a nuclear weapon stolen from the Russian submarine Kursk that sank in the Barents Sea on Aug. 12, 2000, had been smuggled into Britain. …

    Shrimpton says he was informed that Obama was born in Mombasa, Kenya, in about 1960, which means, he said, the information sits in British intelligence files, because that territory was under the British Empire at the time. [Disinformation to put the focus on Kenya?] …

    In conversations with WND, nevertheless, Shrimpton doubled down on the claims he made in 2008 by asserting that NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, as part of his negotiations to leave Hong Kong, agreed to deliver to Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow the classified U.S. military intelligence file on Obama’s DNA.

    Shrimpton made clear he intends to subpoena from the CIA and from British intelligence any records either agency may have on Obama’s DNA.

    “I intend to stand by my allegations regarding the Obama birth certificate, knowing that U.S. intelligence agencies will prefer to characterize me as crazy and delusional rather than admit the CIA has the files I believe they have on Obama DNA,” Shrimpton insisted.”

    Yeah. That’s gonna happen.

  7. Poor, poor barky. Numbskulls are always making errors and typos on his documents, if they aren’t destroyed by coincidental perils.

    Unseal the records, Mr. President. What’s the purpose, specifically?

    And, the biggest laugh of all – they’re already planning his library!

    Dreams from our Usurper.

  8. An Oldie but Goodie

  9. http://blackobama.beep.com
    http://blackdiamondobama.beep.com/apps/photoalbum?aid=41136828

    His secret Faith for Islam and Israels’s not full support are arguments often put forward.
    It is sure, that from all of the religions he knows the Islam the best. The Islam is present in his family (his father, stepfather and their relative are musulmans) very strong, he was educated in Indonesian Islamic school for several years
    There are many proofs of his knowledge of Islam, most of them occur on his official visit and speeches in Islamic countries.
    There is a special feeling or reference in these speeches, – some kind of „I am one of you”- feeling, that gains the trust of Islamic audience… He often uses special phrases, that are well heard is Islamic ideology, and the audience like it. (They not just simply understand it, they can feel the real meaning of the speech)

  10. http://blackobama.beep.com
    http://blackdiamondobama.beep.com/apps/photoalbum?aid=41136828

    The secta Subud is a special mixture of Java mysticism, magic and the Dharma (originated from India), which is controlled from above, by a theocratic, authoritarian system: The teaching can be interpreted only by the main leader. The Dharma is about the circulation of our world, where the destruction is a natural part of the system, so that is why Shiva can be one of the most important, central God in their religion.
    The Secta is based on ordered relationship hierarchy.
    The secta is led by a very little group of leaders, who hold the most of the economical power of the Subud.
    For an example, they new HQ of the Subud was planned to be built in Jakarta. It would have a special „boat” shape with a huge chimney.

  11. http://blackobama.beep.com
    http://blackdiamondobama.beep.com/apps/photoalbum?aid=41136828

    „The african-american Obama suffered several harms during the presidential campaign because of his descent and his religion.
    It spreads since a very long time on conservative blogs, that his has islamic religion, he took his oath on the Koran instead of the Holy Bible, nevertheless he was educated in a radical Islamic school in Indonesia.”

  12. Nice work for putting the 1968 passport renewal back into the discussion WTPOTUS. In particular, Kudos for highlighting that Alphonse LaPorta is still alive and available to be interviewed. It is a shame that the rest of the so called conservative media has largely ignored the very odd content contained in the document. I’ll be here holding my breath waiting for Rush and FOX News to address the obvious, glaring questions that it raises.

    • JC, he’s only one of the many names on their paperwork. There are others we could try to find. It is very odd, isn’t it, that the “official” biographers don’t mention him OR Soebarkah?

      • I agree. There are a number of living historical witnesses that I would like to see some investigative journalist look up. I think Lolo had two kids with his second wife Erna Kustina – Yusuf Ali (b. 1981) and Rahayu Numaida (b. 1984 or 1987). I wonder if either of them the held on to any of Lolo’s old paperwork / records, or a copy of his will. “A Singular Woman” recounts Judy Ware, a family friend of the Dunham’s, meeting Barack Sr. and Stanley Ann in Port Angeles, WA. If she is still alive, I’d like to hear more about that meeting. I’d also like to hear from the nine contractors that got caught illegally accessing Barry’s student loan records in 2007.

        LaPorta’s wiki page is the only published source that I’ve seen that (even tangentially) links him to the 1968 passport renewal.

        I’m still having a hard time coming up with any possible innocent explanation for that Soebarkah notation. That, and the inverted 8 on the selective service application are pretty conclusive evidence that something is very wrong with the official narrative.

        • Something is, indeed, very wrong. But we’re like Cassandras here and elsewhere. Nobody is listening to us. Nobody is even LOOKING because they do NOT want to see. Nobody’s asking the questions that need to be asked. I doubt that they will ask them at least (if then) until after he’s out of office.

      • Miri, I found this on http://www.lamecherry.blogspot.com june 2011. Do a search on Soe Bar kah. I am new here, and may not be doing this correctly.

        http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/search?q=soe+bar+kah

        “Soebarkah

        There has been so much written and conjecture on the forced out into the open Obama passport documents that I have not had much interest in exploring them in the name Soebarkah which appears on the document as one of the listed names of Barack Hussein Obama.

        As an exclusive as only found here though, the name Soebarkah is a confirmation of adoption, Obama’s Muslim status and a sort of strange Islamic prophecy of the day Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro in that it was not in the stars to last.

        Soetoro in the name, in the prefix of SOE links the name to Javanese roots and not Indonesian alone. Why this matters is that Indonesian names reflect region, family and often religion. It is quite obvious or should have been by now in no one has noted it, that the name Soebarkah is a combination and not one word.
        The name is Soe Bar Kah.

        Soetoro signifies the adoptive father as Lolo Soetoro. Bar is obvious in Barack, but also links to the Islamic Aramic in bar means SON. So we have confirmation of this is the Son of Soetoro.

        The Kah is interesting in Indonesian, KAH translates as WAS. In names, KAH is added as a suffix to form a question of “Who?”

        So what SOE BAR KAH means is literal, and I’m genuinely surprised with even Indonesian “experts” asked to explain all of this, that none of them had any comprehension of the language of their own nation.

        Soe Bar Kah means literally Who is this, but the son of Soetoro. …”

        • Welcome, Vivian. I truncated your message so that Lame Cherry doesn’t get upset with us. Please, everyone, go to the link to read the rest of LC’s analysis. Thanks, Vivian, for sharing this.

  13. ~ Aunt Zeituni ~ .. index of stories… in 2001 she kept a CLEAN house
    & babysat Sasha for the Obama’s.. on her limited ..VISA & was illegal
    since 2001…?

    http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/auntzeituni/index

    • Hmmm. Did the Obama’s pay social security taxes or filed a 1099 on the Auntie who was domestic help?

      • Oh, that’s a great question! Remember back in the day when that was the way they deep-sixed so many careers? I’ll bet you dollars to doughnuts (big fat greasy ones) that they paid NO social security for their maid and nanny. She was probably an “independent contractor”.

        • Even if I dependent contractor, they still were obligated to fill out a 1099misc. And if no monies exchanged a value would have had to been assigned to her services. Unless they claimed her as dependent.

          • Another thing: Auntie was born in 1952? That would make her only 62 years old and mid fifties when the country first met her. She sure showed older in appearance in 2009. She was older, as like seventy or more. Now we learn she is only eight years older than prez and not an old auntie after all.

            • I know. Remember the red wig, too? She looked like a tranny (IF that was Zeituni, which I wonder about). Yeah. Sarah was Onyango’s “young” wifey that he took when HE was an old man, but still. That woman did NOT age well, if she was only 61/62 when she died. If she did.

          • Hmm. I wonder if an enterprising person who likes to make FOIA requests could pry his tax return out of the IRS. Weren’t some past years online somewhere? But I don’t know if they go back to 2001.

      • WAH, while updating the O Timeline with “facts” about Zeituni’s death, I discovered that Wikipedia claims she got a SS# in 2001, so the same year she allegedly babysat and cleaned house like a typical black house slave for Mooch and Barry. Perhaps, then, they did pay SS for her. But who knows? MOST EVERY ONE of the articles that Wikipedia links to has been SCRUBBED. Welcome to the scrub-a-dub club, Wikipedia. How do you like it? Your sources are GONE! Anyway, I found another that said she came in 2000 and got a SS# in 2001, so “must have been” legal in 2001. Right. ALL the stories omit that she worked in Chicago for Barry and Mooch. For how long? Who knows? But by 2002 she was applying for asylum. Lived in homeless shelters for 2 years, she said, before she got into the public housing in Boston. Maybe Omar, knowing the ropes, helped her out. She collected her $700 a month disability checks, too. ILLEGALLY. Can we the taxpayers dun her estate for restitution? Zenway linked a new article: http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/04/even-in-death-barack-obamas-aunt-zeituni-is-a-talking-point/361131/#disqus_thread It’s your typical Obama lamestream person supporting him and criticizing those who criticize him for GOLFING instead of going to his aunt’s funeral, the aunt who lived in his home, washed his dirty, stinky socks, cleaned up after him, and took care of Sasha, so Mooch could presumably collect her $300,000 from the hospital just for being black and connected instead of raising her own child.

    • TY, Zenway. There are some interesting links there. Isn’t it also odd that we have to go to the UK papers to learn about the illegal aliens in our midst? They almost look like mother and son:

      He looks more like her than he does his own declared father. Hmm. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2611324/Obama-goes-golfing-instead-attending-aunts-funeral.html So she fulfilled the role grannies usually take–kept house and helped them out when the first baby was born. They say Sasha but the first child was Malia. In any case, why Zeituni and not Madelyn or Granny Sarah or Mother Robinson? Did Barry even claim he KNEW Zeituni the eventual illegal alien? He was so devoted to her that he contributed dinero for her funeral which was either in Kenya or in Boston (the story seems to say both), but Barry went golfing instead of to her funeral. Won’t say how much he donated, either. Funeral photos at this link: http://nairobiwire.com/2014/04/photos-raila-attends-obamas-aunt-zeituni-onyangos-funeral.html They must have had a visitation in Boston and then flown her body to Kisumu for burial: http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/thecounties/article/2000109865/obama-s-aunt-burial-set-for-thursday He sends a condolence note instead of attending the wake, where it looks as if Odinga was holding court. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/us/politics/amid-politics-obama-drifted-away-from-kin.html?smid=tw-share&_r=1 At the link with the photos, is that Omar with Odinga? Malik was at the funeral, too. The one in the U.S. So he was admitted to our country even though he consorts with thugs and terrorists and runs a shady “charity”. Barry claims he has little to do with the Kenya family. Hardly knows them. Can’t be expected to answer for them. OMG. Ian Manners is writing a book, too! Did we know that Zeituni wrote a book?

      • http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2014/04/11/the-legacy-of-obamas-illegal-alien-aunt-n1823144

        Okay. Who exactly is Zeituni’s son?
        “… Like millions of foreign students, business people and tourists to this country, Auntie Zeituni obtained a short-term visitor visa in 2000. It had an expiration date. She was supposed to go back to Kenya in two years after traveling here with her son, who had been accepted at a college in Boston.

        But like millions of other “temporary” visa overstayers, Auntie Zeituni never went home. And despite billions spent on homeland security and immigration enforcement, no one ever went looking for her to kick her out of the country after her time was up.

        Auntie Zeituni had no job skills, no special talent, no compelling reason to keep her here in America as an asset to our culture or our economy. She didn’t value the American Dream. She was a dependency nightmare. She collected $700 a month in welfare benefits and disability payments totaling $51,000. Somehow, Auntie Zeituni also drummed up money to apply for asylum and finagled her way into both federal and state public housing in Boston.

        She contributed nothing to this country. The only “work” she did was gaming the system, complaining about her lot and blaming everyone else for her problems while they subsidized her 14-year illegal overstay.

        Auntie Zeituni’s ridiculous asylum application and what happened afterward are reminders that our asylum and deportation systems are appalling jokes. …”

  14. ~ Political donation ……
    Onyango ~ Illegally contributed money $ to Obama’s 2008 Presidential Campaign. It is Illegal for Foreign Citizens &/or immigrants without Green cards to make political Donations. The campaign stated they would return the donations regardless of her status to avoid any appearance of wrongdoing. …. O’

    • As if they ever care about the appearance of wrongdoing. The entire Obama administration has appeared “wrong” and has perpetrated “wrongdoing” from its inception.

  15. 1.~ She stayed here because she was SICK ? … ( of Africa?)
    or 2.~ She was in danger if she went BACK 2 Africa? not the same?

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/04/obamas-illegal-alien-auntie-onyango-dies-at-61/

    • Imagine Mooch having Zeituni as her “MAID” and nanny. Maid. That’s how you help a beloved family matriarch. Make her your maid. I’m embarrassed for them.

  16. THE Legacy of the illegal alien aunt … racking up profits… from USA
    LEGALS at the TUNE of…. of $51,000…. & more…. ” so very SAD”

    http://michellemalkin.com/2014/04/11/the-legacy-of-obamas-illegal-alien-aunt/

  17. Rosemary Woodhouse

    A photo could have been on the application, but was scrub a dub dubbed , and any sign of staple marks erased during the “passport breach” under M̶B̶M̶ ̶N̶i̶c̶h̶o̶l̶a̶s̶ ̶B̶r̶o̶d̶y̶…John Brennan, How that, in and of itself, hasn’t raised more hackles is yet another item added to the mind boggling category……oh, right it was about Mc Cain 🙄

    Oh yes….a real mystery achievement!

    • Yep. Even the photos they did release with SAD’s passport applications look photoshopped and fake. WHY? We may never learn why.

  18. http://www.independentsentinel.com/stunner-benghazi-was-a-base-for-illegal-arms-shipments-to-syria/

    Now here’s a real news flash. The CIA was running guns through Turkey to Syrian AL QAEDA “rebels” from the Benghazi consulate and Ambassador Stevens was running the show. That’s why Hillary and Barry lied. Who would ever have thunk it? Well, only us chickens who called it on Day One. Didn’t we?

  19. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/04/confirmed-democrat-partys-demonization-of-white-america-radical-agenda-is-pushing-white-voters-to-gop-in-droves/

    You white people are just simply RACISTS!!! 😉

    Good news:

    “Confirmed: Democrat Party’s Demonization of White America & Radical Agenda Is Pushing White Voters to GOP in Droves

    What else would anyone expect? It would be the same if the races were reversed and a white president demonized and oppressed black people.

    Did y’all catch the SCOTUS ruling AGAINST racial preferences and FOR the PEOPLE who voted to outlaw them? The lamestream is going nuts, but praising Sotomayor’s RACIST RANT as being “passionate”. Here’s Sotomayor’s “logic”; at least, this is what it boils down to:

    To enshrine in a state’s constitution a provision that FORBIDS giving racial preference in college admissions is discrimination. It’s discrimination to FORBID racial PREFERENCES for “persons of color”.

    In other words, you discriminate by forbidding discrimination! Why?

    Because the “persons of color”, in her mind, apparently, have a constitutional RIGHT to PREFERENCES. They have a RIGHT to jump ahead of more-deserving students who happen to be WHITE or ASIAN, mostly likely. If the people of a state make a constitution that is color blind, then they are TAKING AWAY a right from those persons of color who DESERVE PREFERENCES, in Sotomayor’s mind. They should be a perpetual racial ELITE, I suppose. And white students should ALWAYS go to the BACK OF THE SCHOOL BUS, forevermore, whether or not they or any of their ancestors EVER held slaves.

    In Sotomayor’s mind, there’s no such thing as MLK’s DREAM of a color-blind society. Nope. Sotomayor wants to enshrine APARTHEID in the law and recreate the Old South, but with the races reversed. It’s only “fair”, after all.

    Somehow, she got into law school, got a degree, was admitted to the bar, and is now sitting on the Supreme Court. How so? Affirmative action, apparently. How else, if this is an example of her “logic”.

    http://hotair.com/archives/2014/04/23/video-media-loves-sotomayors-passion/

    • More of the same. Guilt by association. Smear those who correctly support him on the facts of the case, which means the overreach of the BLM and their militarization and heavy-handed tactics, but who do NOT agree with EVERY statement the man ever makes. We could do the same with progressives. They support Margaret Sanger on some issues. Does that mean, then, that they’re racists who promote GENOCIDE? Even a racist deserves due process and the protection of the laws. So someone spouts racist rhetoric and then what? He deserves whatever the government cares to do to him? They can murder him? Take his land and property? Destroy him and his family simply because he holds racist opinions? (Sure enough, we can bet that some interviewer duped this old, stressed out, pushed-to-the-max guy into making such statements. I’m not even going to bother to read it because it’s IRRELEVANT to whether or not the government is treating him fairly.) EVERYONE deserves EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAWS, EVEN RACISTS.

      • I’m not saying he’s a racist. As I said, I didn’t even read what they SAY he said because by now I know how they lie, distort, goad, take things out of context, and basically SMEAR those with whom they disagree. It’s irrelevant whatever the man said. It has NOTHING to do with whether or not the government is unfairly persecuting him. And those who support his cause are not racists by proxy. Otherwise, then all who support Clinton are adulterers and liars by proxy, including his “wife”.

      • I think he has a point. It didn’t come across as a racist rant in the least to me. Maybe if he rapped it whilst twerking and pulling on his puddin’ they’d agree with him.

        The Federal Government is the whip-cracking master (aiding and abetting the American People’s enemies, criminal convicts and foreign squatters.)

        Taxed Enough Already Into Oblivion.

        • Maybe if he rapped it whilst twerking and pulling on his puddin’ they’d agree with him.

          Ain’t that the truth? It doesn’t matter if it’s racist or not. All that matters is who’s saying it. If it’s a conservative–s/he’s racist. If a progressive, s/he’s a brave patriot who just wants to make things better for everyone.

    • Butt’ Alan O’Neill, who had a “similar struggle”… with Mr. Bundy when he
      was superintendent of the Lake Mead National Recreation Area, expressed concern that the government had backed down.

      “He calls himself a patriot, & says he loves America,” Mr. O’Neill said. “& yet he says he won’t follow any federal laws. You just can’t let this go by, or everybody is going to be like, ‘If Bundy can break the law, why can’t I?’ ”

      YO.. ALAN O’Neill HOW about we START at the TOP-DOG ~ OBAMA?
      “BREAKING ALL THE LAWS'”….. HE DOES…WE DO…GET IT? OK!

      RAHM E ~U NEVER WANT A SERIOUS CRISIS .. 2 GO 2..WASTE ~
      ~ SO ~ LEAVE ~ BUNDY ~ ALONE ~

      • Bundy… is RIGHT Again …. as they / we abort the un-born …
        ~burn baby burn~ like TRASH! I guess their good for some-BODY?

        http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/04/burning_aborted_babies_for_electricity_happening_right_here_in_the_usa.html

        • Rosemary Woodhouse

          The word Negro has officially been banned according to Newspeak. Anyone uttering that word is GUILTY of a Thoughtcrime! I saw a comment somewhere that one would expect an older person to use that word. I meant to amend it by asking, do you mean one who has not been indoctrinated? It’s a WORD! It was once a description with no negative connotation whatsoever….unlike the other N word which only they, themselves can bandy about freely. Another double standard we ALLOWED to evolve.

          NOTHING Bundy said was wrong. He was not stating that slavery should be reinstated, he was stating that while slaves (REPREHENSIBLE, THOUGH IT WAS) while enslaved had families and worked (forced labor though it was. Again, reprehensible) He was basically stating they are enslaved to the government.

          • It is ok tho for Oprah to say it. 🙄

            • I agree with Dana Loesch. It’s not typical for a rancher to be able to speak artfully to the media. If you winnow the wheat from the chaff, there’s probably not an HONEST person in the USA who doesn’t agree with Bundy, although he might have said it better. Who doesn’t call the situation too many blacks are in today as “living on the liberal plantation?” Moynihan probably said as much. He just couched it better and in more euphemistic language. We all know what Bundy meant, in his heart. That too many people on gummint benefits are basically SLAVES TO THE GOVERNMENT, so there’s not a whole lot of difference. He knows what he’s talking about seeing as how in a way he’s a slave to the government. His family and livelihood are being stripped away from him, by the government, instead of a slave owner who’s selling him down the river. Nobody’s allowed to be obtuse anymore. Everybody must pick and choose every word carefully, unless they’re Barack Obama, who can say in-artful things like how some WHITE people get bitter and cling to guns and religion. THEN Barry gets cut all the slack in the world. Ditto for his wife who says she was never proud of her country until her husband ran for the presidency. There are plenty of RACIST statements that the Obamas and their minions have said. Holder probably has a raft of them, which I’m not going to waste my time looking for. But they’re there. However, the lamestream won’t point out THEIR stupid, racist statements. It’s the double standard. A Republican like Todd Akin gets run out of elective office because he phrases something stupidly, while a Democrat like Bill Clinton gets praised and handed the presidency twice even though he’s DONE what Akin only spoke about.

          • The Numinous Negro …. 8-20 2001′ ~ Insightful long read… Enjoy!
            ~ by.. Richard Brookhiser

            http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/220766/numinous-negro/flashback

            • Interesting article. Morgan Freeman has made a career out of playing the “Numinous Negro”. The author is wrong, though. The Numinous Negro lives on in Barry Soetoro.

          • ‘Vernon Winfrey often told me (Barbara) that if “Oprah could”….
            change the COLOR of her skin she would make it LIGHTER’ ..

            so they ARE … angry because … WHY? THEY don’t much like
            BLACK them-selves? SO DON’T REMIND ME! …O’ we get IT NOW

            Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk

        • Oregon, isn’t it? Heard it on radio this morning. Here’s the “waste” they’re making “energy” out of:

        • OH SO SPECIAL…. NOW it’s a BABY?… Leave it to the CLINTONS
          to make … “Chelsea’s blob”.. of “blood & tissue” a “REAL BABY”…

          http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/04/chelseas_baby_not_blood_and_tissue.html

          • Good points!

            “Interestingly, the NY Post chose to alter Smith’s original title, substituting “unborn child” for the word “fetus.” According to Media Matters, the change came after criticism from the mainstream media. Isn’t it interesting how the leftwing media takes offense at calling Chelsea’s baby a fetus?”

            HYPOCRITES ALL!

          • http://nypost.com/2014/04/22/an-open-letter-to-chelsea-clintons-fetus/

            The letter itself is gutsy and so apt.

            “The best part of your make-believe Clinton-Mezvinsky life is that people will pretend you’re good at things and give you gifts like high-paying consultancy gigs when you just got out of college, jobs reporting for NBC News when you have as much camera-awareness as a smoked flounder, and the leadership of the free world because you “deserve it.” Learn to accept everything as your due, baby Clinton-Mezvinsky, and maybe Mommy and you will be the third and fourth Clintons to rule the kingdom!”

            Well said. And you just KNOW that the baby will be Clinton-Mezvinsky if not simply Clinton. How else will s/he get to run on her parents’ and grandparents’ legacies?

      • You said it, Zen. MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLY. If the president isn’t going to obey the laws or follow the Constitution, then why the hell should bitter clingers like us? (Answer: Because we have morals, ethics, and follow God’s commandments.)

        • B I T T’-ER …. Clingers… I am NOT!!! .. BUTT’ just the same…
          we just might B .. 2 WHITE… & OFF to JAIL WE GO? BUTT’

          HOW PROUD… that WTPOTUS…. get treated like ..”TRASH”
          often BUTT’ we do hold our-selves FIRM as we wait for the BOLT
          of….
          LIGHTNING to make THEM eat everything they SAY & DO….
          they have TRIED their BEST…. 2 GET us 2 play DIRTY BACK…
          So I’m ready … with words ~ FIGHT BACK with all our might ~

  20. HOMELESS…. hits another LOTTERY…. what will they think of NEXT?
    no Jail … just take the FREE HAND-OUT …”just like BUNDY SAID” …

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/04/28_homeless_people_given_3000_each_to_stop_trespassing_.html

  21. 44,000 duplicate registered voters in Virginia. Wanna guess what party they probably voted for? http://watchdog.org/140187/duplicate-voters-virginia/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Watchdog%20Newsletter

    “A crosscheck of voter rolls in Virginia and Maryland turned up 44,000 people registered in both states, a vote-integrity group reported Wednesday.

    And that’s just the beginning.

    “The Virginia Voters Alliance is investigating how to identify voters who are registered and vote in Virginia but live in the states that surround us,” Alliance President Reagan George told the State Board of Elections. …”

    • They found that 164 people definitely voted in both Virginia and Maryland in 2012. They’re going to look at DC, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, North Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Georgia. They need to compare Jersey and NY to FLORIDA, and catch all the dual voting “snowbirds”.

      • And we can now guess why Barry is anxious to get drug felons out of jail asap. Then they will vote, too, even though in most states they’re not allowed to, but nobody checks so …

    • Rosemary Woodhouse

      There should not be another election until they true the vote. Oh…wait….

      • Only the people who are against valid, voter ID are people who appreciate and support voter fraud. The American Government should be working diligently to protect their citizens’ voice on all fronts and every level.

        Any official who works to undermine a fair voting system is a thief with an agenda. Their argument is ridiculous and so transparent.
        ~
        Any Supreme Court Justice who ruled in favor of Obamascare is a traitor to the American Doctrine of Individual Freedom. It’s eminent domain of a person’s wages, thus, theft of property. They have no argument. Its Anti-American and dictatorial, pure and simple. You cannot mandate an American to do anything against their belief and conscience. It’s contrary to the Declaration of Independence and incompatible with The Constitution.

        We’ve been coup’d and are technically under arrest.

  22. ########## VOTER ####### I D ???? ################

    WHY DID OUR LIVES TURN TO BBBBBB SSSSSSSS ?

  23. Comments at ORYR:

    Barry Soetoro: “Hey everyone, stop worrying, b/c the GOP wrote a letter!

    If this doesn’t stop Hussein, I don’t know what will.”

    http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/04/japanese-pm-obama-likely-not-born-in.html#IDComment821704590

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/24/Senators-Denounce-Obama-for-Threatening-Entire-Constitutional-System-By-Nullifying-Immigration-Laws
    —–
    bob68: “Finally, a sternly worded letter from Congress. This letter should eliminate the need for any other action by Congress…………….and it might as well because there won’t be any.

    The question is if this letter makes Obama angry will these Senators send him a letter of apology?”

    http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/04/japanese-pm-obama-likely-not-born-in.html#IDComment821713571
    —–
    Barry Soetoro: “Yeah, why DEFUND Hussein’s islamo-nazi treason when you can defeat him by typing a letter every 6 months?”

    • “Your actions demonstrate an astonishing disregard for the Constitution, the rule of law, and the rights of American citizens and legal residents, …”

      Gee, are they only just now getting around to noticing this? As I said before, IF they’re going to allow him to NOT enforce the laws and the border, then WHY ARE WE THE PEOPLE FUNDING A BORDER PATROL in the first place. JUST DEFUND AND FIRE THE ENTIRE INS AND ICE. That ought to get their attention. And then allow the border states to do their own enforcement!

      btw, how the hell are all these government agencies arming themselves UNLESS Congress agrees to the expenditures?

    • “Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX), Jeff Flake (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) were the GOP senators on the Judiciary Committee who did not sign the letter.”

      Three guys who need to be defeated, apparently. Those three RINOs and ALL the DemoncRATS who do not similarly stand up for the Constitution and the RULE OF LAW.

  24. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Without citing the source, I was not-so-suprised to hear someone articulate what we’ve probably all been thinking. I know I have! With 600 US troops headed to Poland, is POtuS going to deploy troops slowly so as to not cause alarm, using Russia to play out his hatred for this nation and its citizenry? Reading between the lines isn’t too difficult as to how it will be implemented. The Global NWO ushered in courtesy of the elected “historical” foreign asset. Would sound paranoid were it not true.

    Again, I use the same quote from Rosemary’s Baby. And I’m tired of picking him up , my friend. 😉 He’s too heavy to carry. Besides, Guy tricked me into it. It was the “mouse” Minnie made.

    Dr. Sapirstein: “Come with us quietly, Rosemary. Don’t argue or make a scene. Because if you say anything more about witches or witchcraft, we’re gonna be forced to take you to a mental hospital. You don’t want that, do you? So just put your shoes on.”

    I really WANT to be a pre-tribber, but am not so certain. And I pray I am worthy. Come Lord Jesus. Quickly!

  25. Links Tab comment is not showing in recent comments roll ?

    Orly strikes again. ~

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Letter-to-Neil-Eggleston.pdf

    • I don’t know what’s up with that post.

    • You keep going, girl! We luv ya. That took guts. Again, wish she had a GOOD proof reader. Does Orly know something we don’t? Did someone prove that the CT SS# Barry used DOES absolutely trace to Bounel? I thought that was only circumstantial. I remember that we tried to figure out who it belonged to. So far as I know, the only connection to Bounel was in that skip tracer database that connected Bounel to the address where Barry lived. Someone elsewhere suggested that Barry may be lawyering up with a criminal lawyer because the Republicans may take back the Senate (impeachment possibilities?) and also that if his criminal lawyer is in a cabinet position, then We the People get to pay for Barry’s defense. As we’ve probably at least partially paid for his stymieing of the ineligibility cases. He probably spins that as government business on account of some imagined threat to “national security”.

      • I cut her a break on the editing, because she’s real. English is her second language and I get the substance.

        Imagine if all the latter day attorneys’ filings were given the “red pen”. It would be racist, ya know.

        She could die. And if she does, she’ll have given her life for us and our Country.

        Courage, regardless as to how she may spell it. I appreciate Orly even though she’s never 100% correct. She’s staring them down on every front an she knows from whence she came.

        • Another thing about Orly, she’s non-stop and I think she’s just trying to get people under oath for deposition.

          The silence on her activities and lack of counter suits is quite revealing. Because even under that circumstance the plaintiff’s would be compelled to go under oath and provide statements and evidence.

          She’s an everyday, common, normal person, I assure you.

  26. I happened to spend a little time researching this Neil Eggleston guy. We knew that his worked in the Clinton Administration. I came across a site called Softwar, that publishes documents that were obtained thru the FOIA.
    There is a document that they titled “The 500 pound Gorilla”. It was a copy of an email from Eggleston to John Podesta, regarding Foster’s (Vince) Files. I never knew that there was a project by the name of Clipper. My, my, my, the things that I am learning. The Clipper Project/NSA, yep, it’s all there. Was Vince involved?

  27. In the 1972 book Madelyn has her home and office as the same address; is it the same as the bank address Ann gave for contact person (think her dad but not sure off hand)

    • I think she just wrote: her father’s full name with address being c/o The Bank of Hawaii, Honolulu. I”ll check.

      • lol, It’s on the passport that we’re discussing.

        I can’t copy the page for some reason. I try but maybe the scribed I’m viewing won’t permit me to copy just a single page. Nevertheless, its the 1968 “renewal”. very strange.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s