Obama Mystery Theater: Stanley Ann’s Passport Renewal of 1968

Ann Dunham Soetoro Passport photos  4 of them CWe’re going to look at a few pages from Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro’s alleged passport files, which were released under a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.  We have many questions about these pages, especially because requests concerning “White House equities”, ever since 2009, “need” to be routed through the White House, as revealed by a recently disclosed memo.

In 2009 the FOIA was effectively rewritten or extra-legally “amended” by former White House Counsel Greg Craig to ensure the White House has hands-on oversight.  One wonders, then, why these particular pages were released to the public and not redacted, as so many other documents have been heavily redacted out of alleged concern for the “privacy” of living people (that being Barack Obama, among others, such as his sister).

Below is the first page in question:

SADSpassport2 - CopyClick images to enlarge.

The page seen above is an application by Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro (henceforth referred to as Ann) to renew a previously issued passport (#F777788, which was dated July 19, 1965).  She made the renewal (not amendment) request on August 13, 1968 (only days after her son Barry’s alleged 7th birthday).  Ann made the application from Djakarta, Indonesia, where she then resided. She listed no current U.S. residence.  She affirmed at that time that she was a U.S. citizen, born in Wichita, KS, on November 29, 1942 (with the 2 in the year appearing overwritten).

Ann paid $5.00 and received a renewal through July 18, 1970, which apparently was the remainder of the 5 years for which a 1965 passport would have been valid.  Implicit in this application is the presumption that either the July 1965 passport was her first passport (originally issued under the name Soetoro) or else that at some point prior to August 1968, she had already amended the 1965 passport to reflect her new married name. Apparently, she did amend the passport:  On June 29, 1967, Ann applied to change the name on her passport to “Stanley Ann Soetoro” (see here and here). Why she then used the fuller name “Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro” when she applied in 1968 to renew that same passport remains a mystery. (The 1967 amendment will be discussed later.)

Whatever the case, this seems to indicate that the passport issued in July of 1965 was not under her newest married name. (Ann had married Soetoro in March 1965, just four months before.)  Apparently Ann decided to retain her previous name (whatever it was on her passport) until she changed her mind in June 1967, and amended her passport to read Soetoro.  Perhaps it was easier or safer for her, now living in Indonesia, to use an Indonesian surname.

The 1965 passport itself might have represented a renewal of a previous passport, issued either in her maiden name or her alleged first married name, Obama.  Oddly enough (or not), the application for the passport of July 1965 is very conveniently missing and possibly destroyedNo other passport records for Ann prior to that date have been released, which is not to say that they never existed. They may also have been conveniently “lost” or “destroyed”, even though the rules seem to require retention of applications for 100 years The documents were allegedly not found and so were not released to the public, even though multiple backups of the database are regularly created.

Note that there are multiple passport record databases (PRISM, TDIS, PIERS, PLOTS, MIS, and CLASP).  One or more of these databases were illegally accessed in 2008 by an employee of a current member of Obama’s administration (John Brennan), effectively, an anonymous source stated, “cauterizing” Obama’s passport files of “embarrassing” information.  Even so, it’s highly unlikely anyone would have been able to “cauterize” all the backups, too.

It could be important for someone to hide the existence of any previous passport that Ann may have possessed, such as a passport issued 5 years before the one dated July 1965.  She may have been issued a passport in July 1960, after she graduated from high school and right about the time that her family moved to Hawaii, where she subsequently is said to have almost immediately met Barry’s African father, got impregnated by him, and then married him.

In late 1965, now married to Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro, Ann may have been planning to relocate to his country.  We might presume that she obtained or renewed a passport in anticipation of the move.  Her husband eventually preceded her to Indonesia in July 1966, where he allegedly made preparations for Ann and Barry to join him.  Barry and his mother, according to Barry’s memoir, were awaiting immunizations and passports for about a year.

Returning to the 1968 renewal application:  On the page shown above, Ann gave the name of the person to notify in case of emergency as “Stanley Armour Dunham, Bank of Hawaii, Honolulu”. Despite instructions to the contrary, she provided no relationship, street address, or even state (although Hawaii can be inferred).

But her father never worked for the Bank of Hawaii and, at that time, his wife, Madelyn, was not yet a vice president at the bank.  Although she worked there in some capacity, she presumably was not yet an officer of the bank. Why didn’t Ann use her mother as the emergency contact, if she used her mother’s place of employment for the address, an incomplete address at that? If she wanted to use her father as the emergency contact, why did she not use his home address?  Did she not know where her own father lived?  It makes no sense.

How could anyone contact Stanley Armour Dunham at the bank without a complete address? In 1968, did they have the Yellow Pages for Honolulu, Hawaii, in Jakarta, Indonesia (or anywhere else in the world that Ann planned to travel)? Even if someone managed to find the correct address, would the U.S. Postal Service deliver a letter addressed to a man at a location where he neither lived nor worked?  How could anyone find a phone number, without an address?  Surely the bank had more than one location.  Since Ann’s father never worked at the bank, he wouldn’t be in the employee directory, so how could anyone associate him with a particular branch or office?

In August of 1968, Ann indicated that she was “indefinite” about her travel plans or any eventual permanent stay in the USA.  She was also “indefinate” [sic] about plans to continue to reside abroad, although she did state that she was “married to an Indonesian citizen.”

Ann signed her name as it was indicated on the top of the application, with “Dunham” as part of her middle name.  The form was “affirmed” by the vice consul of the U.S. embassy, whose name was given as Alphonse F. La Porta There’s supposed to be a seal on the form, but none is readily visible.

At that time, La Porta was chief of the consular office for whom vice consuls worked.  La Porta had a long career in the foreign service, with many years in Muslim-connected or dominated areas, such as Indonesia, Sumatra, Malaysia, Bali, Turkey, Kosovo, and Brunei, among others. [Emphasis added to quotes; comments added in brackets.]

[La Porta] enrolled in the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, graduating in 1960. …  He then decided to pursue a Master’s degree at New York University from 1960 to 1962 after which he entered the U.S. Army where he worked in Army Intelligence. He finished his enlistment in 1963 and began to pursue his Ph.D. at Georgetown University when he was recruited to work at the National Security Agency. …

He entered the Foreign Service in 1965. His first assignment was to the Office of Planning and Management. [A notable gap here. See below.] From 1967 to 1970 he was Political Officer and Chief of the Consular Section in the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta.

Years later, La Porta was made ambassador to Mongolia, under President Bill Clinton.  A 203-page interview of La Porta, from 2004, reveals that La Porta and Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro might have crossed paths many times and likely knew each other personally, although she is not mentioned in that particular interview and, in fact, the only current connection found between these two persons on Internet search engines appears to relate to a claim on Wikipedia that La Porta was dragged into “conspiracy theories” by Orly Taitz, because he attested to Ann’s passport paperwork.  Quite curious.

One must wonder why no reporter has bothered to look La Porta up to ask about his memories of the future president’s mother, or her black son, whom he may have known, too.  After all, Barry’s memoir says that his mother worked at the U.S. embassy, where Barry was wont to visit her. Only last month, La Porta attached his name to a letter to Obama, opposing three nominees for ambassadorships based upon perceived inexperience and political motivations.

In the 2004 interview, La Porta stated that he first arrived in Indonesia in April 1965 (p. 36), as chief of the consular section.  He described the political conditions around that time:

Ambassador Marshall Green had arrived only six months or so before we arrived.  The embassy had been evacuated and families were just starting to come back to the mission in early 1967[Families like the Soetoros?] There was a general lack of clarity, although what was clear was that the United States was banking on the army under Suharto to restore stability and to create conditions to get the economy moving.  In this regard, USAID (United States Agency for International Development) had just reestablished its mission as a small unit in the embassy and the multilateral organizations — the World Bank, IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)–were moving in (p. 37).

His assignment at the consular office, he says, was from

’65 to ’67 and then I switched over to the political section (p. 41).

So there’s a problem here.

La Porta, by his own admission, was not assigned to the consular office in August 1968, when Ann’s passport renewal application was processed, nor was La Porta a vice consul, as indicated on the renewal application by the word “vice” having been typed in (in red, along with other information typed in red.)  However, these titles are tricky and depend upon other information, such as whether or a not person is a career officer in the Foreign Service, by whom the person was appointed (Secretary of State or POTUS), issues of diplomatic immunity, and sometimes even what title various countries expect or require the person to hold.

Nevertheless, La Porta said he was chief of the office, when he was there, which apparently he was not, at least not in August 1968.  That’s a full 8 months into ’68.  Perhaps he was simply mistaken, although it’s interesting that his assignment prior to 1967 is omitted from the Wikipedia article cited above and also from the other bio linked earlier.  The positions and dates listed at the beginning of the text of the interview appear to be a timeline for the topics discussed, not a set-in-concrete resume.  La Porta clearly stated in the interview that he switched to the political office from the consular office before 1968.

It’s of note that the positions of consular officer and political officer vary greatly. Consular officers, among other duties, facilitate adoptions. Political officers, on the other hand, talk to and negotiate with foreign government officials.  A political officer would not be vetting passport renewals.

La Porta mentioned in the interview that his vice consul at the time was Dick La Rocha, even joking about how people were always mixing them up due to the similarity of their surnames (p. 39).  That he refers to his vice consul further suggests that his own title was not vice consul, but perhaps chief consul or even simply consul.

La Porta also stated that his wife, Ann Winget La Porta, was

in charge of the American Women’s Association welcome committee, so new Americans arriving in Jakarta would get a visit from my wife (p.40).

Did Ann La Porta visit the other Ann to welcome her to Jakarta?  It’s likely that both La Portas knew Ann Soetoro, considering her work there and the fact that the American community in Jakarta was relatively tiny, due in no small part to violent unrest during the mid-1960s.

Throughout the interview, La Porta mentioned working with many other organizations over the years, including USAID (for which Ann worked); the Asian Development Bank (for which Ann later worked); Aramco and Mobil Oil (Lolo Soetoro was employed in the oil business); and the Soros Open Society Institute (the latter reference found on p. 173).

In the interview, La Porta discusses his on-going training in the Indonesian language during 1966 and 1967, when he was already living in Indonesia. Coincidentally, Ann taught English at the U.S. embassy beginning in January 1968 until early 1970; she sometimes brought her son Barry to work with her.  Maybe La Porta didn’t notice him. Ann later taught languages at a not-for-profit that, by its very nature, would have been in close contact with the U.S. embassy’s political office.  From a book by Janny Scott:

The Suharto government was embarking on a five-year plan, but Indonesia had few managers with the training to put the new economic policies into practice. The school, called the Institute for Management Education and Development, … had been started several years earlier by … Father A. M. Kadarman, with the intention of helping build an Indonesian elite. … In 1970, the Ford Foundation made the first in a series of grants to the institute to expand the faculty and send teachers abroad for training.  At about the same time, Father Kadarman hired Ann

Ann’s first husband, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., was said to be part of a similar program designed to build a Kenyan elite.  After his education in the USA, he planned to return to Kenya to become part of his country’s elite.

When Ann was working at the Institute for Management Education and Development, La Porta was working as a political officer at the embassy, so he should certainly have been aware of, maybe even involved in, a Suharto government initiative being facilitated by the Ford  Foundation.  A biography from 2012  reveals more about La Porta:

He also co-chairs the Southeast Asia area studies course at the Foreign Service Institute, U.S. Department of State, and is a consultant on Asian affairs to the U.S. Pacific Command (PACOM), headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii.  In 2008-09, he served as chief of party for Development Alternatives International (DAI) on a USAID project to advise the foreign ministry in Pristina, Kosovo. 

He is a board member of  the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), the Malaysian-American Society, and the Friends of Mongolia and is an advisor to the Hawaii-Indonesia Chamber of Commerce.

The Hawaii-Indonesia Chamber of Commerce is located in Honolulu and likely interacts with the East-West Center, which was founded by Congress and is associated with the State Dept.

Ann and Lolo Soetoro were both students at the East-West Center before they moved to Indonesia with little Barry.  The East-West Center has subsequently published several works written by La Porta.  La Porta’s later career closely parallels the interests specific to Ann Soetoro’s career–economic and political development in particular.

Off topic but perhaps of interest, in the lengthy interview, La Porta had less than glowing opinions to offer about Newt Gingrich (p. 149), Donald Rumsfeld (pp. 183-198), that “cowboy” George W. Bush (p. 124; p. 193), and Condi Rice (p. 119; p. 203).

La Porta did, however, offer interesting perspectives about what was going on in Indonesia at the time that Ann allegedly took her very young son into the thick of things, where, according to La Porta, every American was suspected of being CIA (p. 52; pp. 98-99).

To be continued …


h/t Papoose for the idea for this post.


207 responses to “Obama Mystery Theater: Stanley Ann’s Passport Renewal of 1968

  1. Incredible, Miri.
    The applicant resides at D’jkarta, Indonesia and her dad at a bank?

    You’d be nominated for a Pulitzer if it was August 13th, 1968.

    • Rosemary Woodhouse

      Amen! Amen! Would I be over the top naive to have a glimmer of hope that it still could happen?

  2. http://milfuegos.blogspot.com/2010/09/special-rpeort-usaid-cia-consortium-in.html
    you’ll need to read the whole thing. It supports what Miri says and more . I read about the Berkley Mafia back in 2009, the economists from various universities like Stanford, Cornell, Princeton, U. Kentucky ect. The Berkley gang though is interesting in that the Dunhams have ties to that. Also, that photo of Ann sitting in what looked to be a store/storage facility always made me think she was Ford/CIA/USAID involved. It looked like grain bags of some kind sitting next to her, probably rice which had been cut off during Kennedy’s time and then reinstated during Johnson’s administration. I wondered if back then is when Ann began to use the name Stanley Ann because it related that she was Stanley Dunhams daughter and that maybe everyone knew Stanley because he was heavily involved as well, just like the Geithner family.

    • alfy, been trying to find more about Kadarman but all I can find is that he’s a Jesuit and involved in the usual progressive pursuits. Whether or not he’s a liberation theologist remains to be seen.

    • Wow, alfy. The run-down of universities involved is pertinent: Stanford (Ndesandjo, Toutonghis); Cornell (Rick Ndesandjo, although no evidence yet he’s anything but a peripheral person); Berkley (Stanley Armour Dunham, for one); Princeton (don’t know off hand); U of Kentucky (that’s where Lolo was in the mid-50s). What about Harvard? Good point about Shirley/Sally and the change to S. Ann and then Stanley Ann. Yep. Not only was Geithner there in Jakarta, but so was Barry’s alleged white girlfriend–Genevieve Hogan Cook.

      • I just listed the Universities I remember from one of the first articles I ever read about Indonesia’s coup. Seems one of the Texas Universities and of course Harvard….Henry Kissenger was there…you know full well how involved he was in every thing from assassinations, coups. He’s notorious.

  3. FAKE photos
    April 5, 2014

    Shawn Glasco:

    “Did Barack Obama Sr. visit Hawaii in 1971?”

    “But was Obama Sr.’s 1971 Hawaii visit, as narrated in Dreams, a hoax? To begin with, Dreams specifically states that the “only” pictures of Barack Jr.’s “father’s” Christmas visit were “ones” where Obama Sr., Ann, and Barack Jr. were “stand[ing] in front” of a “Christmas tree,” with Barack Jr. holding an “orange basketball” and Obama Sr. “showing off [a] tie.” And yet three other “only” Christmas photos have mysteriously appeared the web and in Obama biographies.

    1. A lesser-known photo, with a Daphne Barak credit and appearing on “anti-birther” websites, does show Obama Sr., Ann, and Barack Jr. at a “Christmas tree,” but neither an “orange basketball” nor a “tie” is seen. Furthermore, Ann’s arms are outstretched, handing a large Christmas present to Obama Sr., with the present balanced on two of her fingertips and on Obama’s Sr.’s left hand – yet, simultaneously as Obama Sr.’s arms are crossed, he somehow hands a smaller Christmas present to Barack Jr., similarly balanced on both of Obama Sr.’s and Barack Jr.’s fingertips, even though Barack Jr.’s hand is awkwardly at his side and he is kneeling at a distance farther from Obama Sr. than a sitting Ann. The Daphne Barak “Christmas tree” photo is apparently fake.”

    [much more at link]


  4. @Miri, You guys never cease to amaze me with your research. The connections of this guy are not your normal childhood. NWO born and bred?

  5. Heart attacks and suicide. Oh, so common. Move along, nothing to see here. How many have jumped (CIA, bankers) in just the last few weeks.

  6. I made 2 posts on Links this morning, one appears to be showing (#2), yet on the Recent Comments sidebar above it doesn’t appear that I was on Links this morning. Maybe its my pc. Does anyone see the entries on Links on the Recent Comments sidebar here on this page?

    • Nope, but that’s probably because my comments shoved them off the list. Apparently, it’s not possible to extend the list to include more or even all comments. I wish it would have a “roll” function because that would make it SO EASY for people to know where we’re commenting on any day.

      • Miri, you weren’t even on line yet when I made those comments. Bo even posted in response to me at the time and they were not showing on the list. One of the comments did get through though. (#2)

        😉 😉

        • I was just on Links again and its not showing on the Recent Comments. And, as a matter of fact neither are you on the list as being there.
          FWIW – no biggie. Just an observation.

        • Could it be your computer? Did you refresh the screen? I see the list but not two comments by you on Links. Just the one. Wonder where the other one went? It’s not in trash or spam.

          • I just posted there at 3:36 and I am not showing as being at Links on the recent comments roll.

            • Papoose. I see it and I can’t explain it, but it appears to be only the Links post. When I comment on another post, it shows up in the list. When I comment on the Links post, it doesn’t show up on the list! Weird.

          • Thanks Miri. Yes, I tested that too… Just the Links link that I can see. But it did start when I posted the first comment on Links which was there, and then disappeared. I went to add something to the first post and it was gone. And then saw the activity wasn’t showing up in the comment roll.

            Thanks again.

            I still can’t get Breitbart of WND. weird.

          • that happened or something like that happened to me this morning.

    • @Papoose, a couple weeks ago while using Firefox, I would click a bookmark for one of my usual pages I browse. And it would be the same stories I had already seen. I could click refresh or reload and get to the new posts…it stopped after a couple days. I chalked it up to a “Glitch”.

  7. I see several from you this morning @Papoose

    • Thanks, Bo.

      Do you see any that say Papoose on Links? I was there twice late this morning. I see the one comment posted — yet neither is showing in the Recent Comments section on this current page.

  8. Its seems that both Breitbart and WND are down today.

    from my end, anyway.

  9. ~ Barack Obama: ~

    ‘The Only people that don’t want to disclose the TRUTH,

    are people with something to HIDE.”

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        The birth announcements have always been the most suspicious, but difficult to prove “proof” submitted in ’07. Are there no hoarders in Hawaii?

        • I’ve always wondered about that. The information on those pages is exactly the kind of thing people save and put in scrapbooks, but maybe not the whole page. However, some people do save entire pages or newspapers. So much of this is kept under the radar, by design. If more knew about the issue of the announcements, then more in the public might go looking for a real copy. But the media suppression seems to have worked so far. Note that we also don’t have any CORROBORATING copies that are original newspaper copies. If somebody did find a newspaper and knew about the controversy, then they’d like as not also know about people like Breitbart and Fuddy, and their fates. That would give someone pause. I suspect that maybe, after he’s out of office, evidence will suddenly be flying out there. And the “journolists” who so far have been mum will suddenly be writing tell all books and collecting millions (off our backs, too, probably, as we’ve already seen at least one so-called biographer who cadges information from blogs like ours).

          • Rosemary Woodhouse

            Miri, As I am certain you recall, “Collier’s Mansion” is the term which was used for many years to describe the condition in which hoarders live. “Collier’s Mansion”, specifically, was wall to wall newspapers as well as other detritus. Called a firefighter’s nightmare. Original copies MUST exist. DO exist! But you are right about the media and I doubt such hoarders are inclined to use the internet which is the only outlet for truth, these days.

            • I don’t recall that expression, RW. I learn something new every day. The older I get, the more my house looks like Collier’s Mansion! Spring cleaning is a MUST this year. 🙂

    • ladysforest:
      “Extra, Extra, Announcing obama’s Birth”

      “New August 2013 material at the bottom of post”

      “This blog post is about the research I have done into the history, microfilms and stories connected to the newspaper birth announcements of obama’s birth.”

      Ponder this: No one can access the Certification Of Live Birth (COLB) presented as proof of obama’s birth in HI. But they cannot restrict the public’s access to these microfilms.

      It is truly remarkable how these are morphing since first being discovered, allegedly, at the State Library in Honolulu HI, is it not?”

      “Round Pegs In Square Holes”

      “This is a well intentioned attempt to abbreviate my post “Extra, Extra, Announcing Obama’s Birth”.

      “*After the first postings of the freshly discovered obama birth announcements, many noticed that the appearance of the obama announcements changed considerably over a short period of time. Much like the COLB did. The examples of this are in the original post,”


  10. Ronald REAGAN – Article II (NBC) both parents Citizens when he was born – was born in 1911 in IL.
    41. George H. W. BUSH – Article II (NBC) both parents Citizens when he was born – was born in 1924 in MA.
    42. William J. CLINTON – Article II (NBC) both parents Citizens when he was born – was born in 1946 in AR.
    43. George W. BUSH – Article II (NBC) both parents Citizens when he was born – was born in 1946 in CT.

    44. (Putative President) Barack Hussein OBAMA – Not a natural born Citizen (NBC). His father was a foreign national and British Subject and was NOT a U.S. Citizen. Obama was seated due to FRAUD about his nativity story and the progressive domination and corruption in the main-stream media of the legal and constitutional meaning of NBC and due to the willful complicity and neglect of Congress. Obama’s father was a foreign national. His father was never a U.S. Citizen nor was Obama’s father even an immigrant to the USA or even a permanent resident in the USA. His father was only sojourning in the USA attending college, first in HI and then later at Harvard University in Massachusetts, and was deported back to Kenya at the request of Harvard University due to his unseemly activities there. Obama was born in 1961. Obama himself claimed he was born in Kenya for many years in his various editions of his pre-2007 book agent’s biographies for him. After 2007 Obama claims he was born in HI but his birth registration there most likely was falsified by the maternal grandmother (to get her new grandson much desired and coveted U.S. Citizenship) since no official hospital record of his birth has been produced . A PDF version of an alleged long-form birth certificate has been posted online by Obama but it has been proved to be a computer manufactured forgery by AZ Sheriff Arpaio and his Lead Investigator Mike Zullo. They have also proved that Obama’s alleged draft registration card is a forgery too. The laws in HI were very lax in regards to registration of births. There is no independent evidence of Obama being born in HI. No pre-natal records and no post-natal records for his mother being in HI during the alleged birth month in 1961 have been found. No name of an attending physician, mid-wife, or paramedic called to the scene of a speculated home birth report exists. No independent witnesses to the claimed birth in Hawaii have ever been named or surfaced. No post-natal care records exist in Hawaii for the care of Obama’s mother or the child . In fact, there is no record at all for his mother even being in Hawaii in August 1961, the alleged month of Obama’s alleged birth in Hawaii. No records exist of her being in HI for the 6 months prior to the alleged birth date. As to the much touted two newspaper announcements, false registration of a birth at home in HI with no witnesses would have generated the vital record in HI and also would have automatically generated the two newspaper ads. Those ads were placed automatically by the state as a result of ALL birth registrations – real or falsified! And to further contradict the Hawaiian birth nativity story of Obama, there are many accounts by Obama’s paternal family in Kenya, Kenyan government officials, and Kenyan and African newspapers — that Obama really was born in the hospital in Mombasa, Kenya. And again, prior to 2007 Obama himself touted to the world that he was born in Kenya as exemplified by the book agent’s biography published and re-edited over many years as Obama’s career unfolded but always saying he was born in Kenya, up until 2007 when he decided to run for President and the massive scrubbing, forging, and re-creation of his life history and records began. No other President in history has had so many accounts attesting to his being foreign born and/or can provide NO contemporaneous birth witnesses or independent evidence to corroborate their subsequent claim to U.S. birth. There is a disinformation technique called “The Big Lie”. Obama is “The Big Lie”!

    45. TO BE DETERMINED – Must be an Article II (NBC). Both parents must be a U.S. Citizen (born or naturalized) when their child was born in the USA and said child must at the time of the election be a least 35 years of age and have been a resident of the USA for at least 14 years.

    • Having two American parents is the only thing we have left as to being American as it seems anyone can become an American…

      Its our nationality, not just our citizenship. You can only be a Natrual born citizen if you are full blooded. So you were born here, then you’re native, but not natural.

      • “Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it.”~~JFK

    • In light of the suspicions that Ann was perhaps somehow part of a CIA program embedded within USAID: Some have suggested that the “military exception” put out there for McLame would apply then to Barry, too. And then they might say he gets a pass if his mom is working somehow as a diplomat.

    • YO, ……CALLING …. NANCY PELOSI (D-CA) …… HELLO!!!!!

      Why DID U….DO THAT? WE PONDER ON 4 an ANSWER from U ~

      Although it is customary for the parties to certify the eligibility of their candidates under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution, the Democrat Party chair, Rep. NANCY PELOSI (D-CA),

      made that certification in 2008 only to the State of Hawaii, which has a statutory requirement that such Constitutional certification be made. The remaining 49 states received no such certification in support of the eligibility of Barack Obama.

      Allegedly Pelosi prepared two different certifications verifying the eligibility of Barack Obama for the Presidency, which were both prepared on the same day, August 28, 2008, and notarized by the same individual.

      The Certification of Nomination sent to the state of Hawaii mentioned the Constitutional requirement:

      “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”

      The Certification of Nomination sent to the other 49 states did not mention the Constitutional requirement:

      “THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 through 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively.”

      We are asking nicely. Nancy PELOSI, why the two certifications?

      We can handle the TRUTH!!!!!!

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        As surmised in the article you posted by Lawrence Selin(sp?) in Sonoran News, It seems as if they are just running the clock. Unless Joe Arpaio truly has earth shattering news, we continue to discuss this in a vacuum. Sad, but true.

  11. Here’s irony for you. An “anti-birther” blogger writes a post about violent birther rhetoric and within comments on that same blogger’s site, there are comments wishing Orly’s accident had turned out otherwise and the said blogger blithely comments on, seemingly oblivious to the hateful comments on said blogger’s own blog.

  12. http://www.breitbart.com …… is back…. i guess they didn’t LIKE
    BUSH being there …… O’

    • I’m seeing it for the first time. Butt, here he is in his own words:

      Q: Is there anything else that we should cover in this period, in Indonesia, this was what 65 to ‘67?

      LA PORTA: ‘65 to ‘67 and then I switched over to the political section.
      Q: Have we covered the consular section?

      LA PORTA: I think we’ve pretty much covered consular work.

      Click to access La%20Porta,%20Alphonse%20F.toc.pdf

      page 41

      • If he was head of both sections (consular and political) beginning in ’67 and since, by his own admission, he had a vice consul working for him named Dick La Rocha, then surely La Porta was TOO BUSY heading up the political office at such a critical time to be signing off on passport renewals. Where was Dick that day? Why’d they type “vice” next to La Porta’s name if he was head of the whole freaking place (sounds like)? How’d he get such an important job at his age, btw? He wasn’t even 30 years old. People say Stanley Armour was Army intelligence. So was La Porta.

    • Yeah, that’s the Wikipedia article that referred to Orly Taitz drawing him into “conspiracy theories” because she asked for info about him.

  13. Is it a coincidence that both these separate documents are stamped with the date 7/29/10 even though they are going to 2 separate individuals?

    Also note that on page 7, there is another letter from the D H S with the typewritten date of 7/29/10.

    Was this a coordinated effort on the part of our government?

    • Here’s Senior’s documents.

      Funny that some girl left for Africa on August 16, 1964. (page 5)

    • JUL 2 9 2010 … the 29 has a SPACE in BOTH…. ?
      BUT the “JUL” (JULY) ink overlaps in ONE…. ??

  14. I think Alphonse F. La Porta might be the key witness in the whole mystery. Carefully read what the affirmation statement on page #1 of the renewal application says about when and why the name of “any person included on the passport or documentation” “should be struck out”. By striking out Barack Hussein Obama, and including his new Javanese name of Soebarkah (on page #2), Stanley Ann is formally communicating to the US government that her son has been naturalized as an Indonesian citizen. Alphonse F. Laporta is formally witnessing this communication on behalf of the US government. If there were any investigative journalists left alive in America, they would be camped out in front of La Porta’s front door.

    • Agreed. You anticipated my thoughts. I cover this in part two, which isn’t finished yet; but I have a rough draft. It’s complex, so I’m going to try to lay it out. I wish I had a source in a passport office who would OBJECTIVELY analyze these documents.

      • I’m looking forward to reading your take on the issue. Striking out “the portion that applies” may be technically meant to refer the act (such as naturalization), however (given the context) I could easily see Stanley Ann reading it as referring to the person included on the passport to whom it applies. In any case, good catch on realizing that La Porta is still alive and available to be interviewed about the event.

        • He would have been a contemporary of hers. He’s only in his early 70s, iirc. I wondered just how big the U.S. embassy in Jakarta, at that time, COULD have been. She worked there. He worked there. They HAD TO know each other. Granted, the interview with him took place in 2004, and at that time Barry wasn’t big news (don’t think he’d made his big speech at the Dem convention yet). So there was no reason then for anybody to ask him about Barry, but surely he had to notice him there with his mother at the embassy. That’s where that one infamous bogus story was set. At the embassy, when Barry was visiting his mother, he saw that magazine that told (he said) about how a black man had been so ashamed of his black skin that he tried to scrub his blackness off. Of course, people who actually looked into it learned it was a fable. iirc, it was supposed to be Life magazine? Then when somebody pointed out there was no such story, he changed it to Ebony, but then people researched that and it wasn’t that magazine, either. So far as I know, nobody has ever found such a story in any magazine from that year.

        • My head’s spinning with all the possibilities, JC. I hope my “take” doesn’t disappoint. I wish somebody could explain all this to us, because it truly makes no sense to me.

        • La Porta… key word above “alive & available” 2 B inter-viewed….O
          let’s hurry…. ok & he’s 75 also…

          Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour I Peter 5:8

    • I had the same feeling about that, the purpose, i.e., for the “renewal”.

      Why would she need to renew a passport in 1968 when her 1965 ‘Soetoro’ passport is valid for 5 years? In the initial summary of the scribed document is explained passports were valid for 5 years.

      And it appears the child was (excluded) then added, as per the instructions.

      I do note its not signed, however, so there’s no way of knowing if its the actual backside of the front being represented. Being that it was 1968 I think that an amendment should have been requested.

      It would seem more likely that she would be doing adding/excluding in 1970 since that is when the child was supposedly sent back to the USA

    • JC, there are plenty of other people who witnessed. One, his adopted sister Lia, is dead, so she can’t witness to anything anymore. But there’s Tim Geithner, his sister Audie (sp?), and his father who were there. Also there in Jakarta was Genevieve Hogan Cook who just a few years ago, on command, showed up to suddenly claim that she was Barry’s “white girlfriend” when he was at Columbia. But Cook was also in Jakarta at the same time as Barry and Geithner.

  15. April 6, 2014

    “Team Arpaio: Quiet Before Storm; Sheriff Arpaio About To Change America’s Political Landscape Forever”

    Mark Gillar Via Twitter:

    — “Soon we will learn that those who have the responsibility of protecting us have instead betrayed us.”

    — “This is the quiet before the political storm. Arpaio about to change America’s political landscape forever.”

    — “Between now and the midterms, shocking revelations will be brought forward by Sheriff Joe.”

    — “… LFBC stuff would be out already if not for other crimes discovered. LFBC just the tip of the iceberg.”

    — “… Believe it or not, the new stuff somewhat eclipses the LFBC crime. It’s that big.”

    Mark Gillar (host of “Tea Party Power Hour”) is the voice-over in the Cold Case Posse’s Obama fraud video presentations.

    WebSite: http://teapartypowerhour.com/

    BlogTalk: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar

  16. I linked on Senior’s documents that Papoose put up and I see this in a M. F. McKeon signed document dated 4/28/64 on page 21:
    “After alien stated he was married, he said he was separated and that they may get a divorce. The WIFE IN THE PHILIPPINES (emphasis mine) from whom he is separated is a USC… ”
    If this is SAD, she would have needed a passport earlier than 1965 in order to go to the Philippines in 1964. Maybe it was issued in 1963, ie. 1968-5 years=1963. If it’s a different woman he married then WOW. Thanks for this topic.

    • Excellent catch, Martha555. We’ve wondered whether or not that “wife in the Philippines” is SAD or not. The East-West center had a program where they’d send representatives over to Southeast Asia, through the Philippines and beyond, including Indonesia, to help shepherd new students to study in Hawaii. So either that “wife in the Philippines” IS SAD or else it’s another wife! And if it’s SAD, then she HAD TO HAVE A PASSPORT. TY so much! I’ll try to remember to incorporate your tip in the next installment.

      We’re up in the air over for how long a passport was valid in the mid-60s. I swear I read an article at WND that said it was 5 years. I tried hard to locate something definitive, but ended up spending too much time looking, so I dropped it. Whatever the case, the passport she was renewing in 1968 was issued to her in July 1965, so if she was in the Philippines before then (like April 1964), then she HAD TO HAVE an earlier passport.

      • Miri, I located the info. It was in plain sight. Read the intro.

        Also, about that Philippine wife, (remember reading along time ago that her name was Ann also)… I haven’t entirely discounted that he lied about that as up to that point he was not admitting to being married on the other applications. We need to find extant info on the Philippine and I’m sure we have it here somewhere in the archives. (unless we picked up in the document when it was finally released).

        • ~ …. Would this be the Anna -Ann ???

          (O…& if U have some spare change.. TL- LC- his Mom & neighbors
          are in much need of some “green love” I feel 4 them ALL right now..)


          • LC would be more credible is there were sources for these claims.

          • Oh …I love …CHERRY … no matter what ” they ” …say….

            • LC is entertaining but it’s frustrating to read the claims and have no way of knowing if they’re real or imaginary.

          • I don’t know about the Ann from Philippines named Chin, but I can concur with all his statements regarding the INS records as they are in black and white. I especially appreciate wherein he notes BHO scratches out his wife’s name and then writes in Ann S. and yet fails to provide information on the child that was just born a few weeks before his entry. (8/31/61).

            sidebar: which would have been around the time SAD drops in on her friend in WA with a newborn. She’s traveling with a baby and he’s applying for an extension til 8/9/62. NUTZ

            • That’s my problem, too, and the Lederer’s Bar thing. Not to mention the name being suspect (CHIN?) and that she was hired AND that she was that girl standing there with BHO Sr. and (allegedly) Stanley Armour on the tarmac, dock, or whatever the heck that is where they were photographed.

          • Who is TL?

          • I think “Tiger Lily”… I remember LC was taking care of his Mom when that reference turned up… and then there is someone else LC is very fond of also that he refers to, a girl, iirc. Its blurry.

          • Ditto, Miri

          • Rosemary Woodhouse

            Well, Zen one of “they” would be me and that’s okay. Sometimes LC is uncannily accurate, but with every post I’ve read, he/she/it allows their ego to get in the way. Comparing himself/herself to Joan of Arc and having the audacity to claim he/she has a direct line to God’s Throne….that’s blasphemy. Remove the blasphemy, the ego as well as the incessant begging and perhaps LC would have more credibility.

            • Does anyone know off hand: Was SAD working anywhere in Hawaii before she moved to Indonesia to work at the embassy? Anybody remember?

          • Miri, according to p. 60 of Lolo’s U.S. papers, (11-12-66) SAD worked for the A.S.U.H. (Associated Students of U.H.) as a Senate Secretary, making $325. She also tutored U.S. Students, and graded papers.

          • Yea, the U.S. student thing hit me as funny/strange at first. Guess they must have had a lot of foreign students at the University of Hawaii.

          • Stanley Ann states in that last paragraph that she speaks French. That Russian language class that she took with Barack must not have helped her. She doesn’t mention Russian as a language that she can speak.

        • Papoose, I’m lost. Which link is where I’ll find the introduction? The Lolo INS records? I don’t recall that we knew the name of the wife in the Philippines. I do sort of recall some speculation that he could have been married before. He was, after all, older than she was, just like BHO Sr. was older than she was. Isn’t it rather typical for men in third-world countries to marry young? Well, he was part of the Indonesian royal family and a military man, but still …

          • Re: Passport validity term

            On SAD’s FOIA, on the very first page their is an intro:

            Published by puzo1
            29 Jul 2010: Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10. Documents in this file are out of order. This file indicates via the 1965 amendment application numbered P3 in this file that Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama had a passport prior to 1965 and she was applying to amend it since she got married to Lolo Soetoro in March 1965. Since they were good for 5 years that means she likely got her first passport as early as in late 1960 of early…
            Also found in:president, File, Application, obama, Stanley, mother, Congress, FOIA, passport, ann, lawsuit, dunham, soetoro, usurper, kerchner, apuzzo, kerchner v obama

            • TY. So that’s Apuzzo’s take on this? I’ll take his word for it that they were good for 5 years. I read that elsewhere. Does his logic hold, though? She amended the 1965 passport in 1967 to her new name, BUTT she got that passport in July 1965, AFTER she was already married to Soetoro. Allegedly. She RENEWED that same passport in July 1968, but why, if it was good for 5 years? That means it would already be valid until July 1970 (1965-1970). NUTZ. 🙂

              • btw, I know when I write the next part(s), I’m going to forget all of your good points, everybody. At that point, remind me and I’ll do an edit to incorporate them in the right spots.

          • For Pete’s sake, Miiri.

            We’d need powerpoint to keep this straight.

            That’s been my contention forever – why the need for that bogus 1967 amendment when it states right there that the passport was from 7/19/65. She was already married to Lolo for over 3 months! That Jakarta “renewal” is the conundrum. She was already there on a passport that would have been in her married name begin with. What was she trying to pull on 8/13/68? Renewing her passport until 7/18/70? I don’t think so. Though they claim in red she paid $5.00.

            And then, we see she comes home to the USA on 10/21/71 and needs an exception to get entry into the Country. And the passport referred to on that request? The 7/19/65 passport!

            (Which incidentally, 7/19/65 was exactly the same date that Lolo and she were madated to appear before the DOJ /INS in Hawaii at 3:00 pm and explain themselves, per the Lolo immigration FOIA)

          • The passport renewal via the vice consul was used for another purpose since it certainly doesn’t apply to her needs.

            Question for FOIA, where’s the 1970 renewal application. She sure did need a 1970 passport to get back into the Country on 10/21/71. Why didn’t she apply to the Jakarta consul for a renewal/ extension.

            And where was her Baby on 10/21/71? Would the little one need her own passport since she wasn’t an American citizen? Or was she leaving that person indefinitely, too? How did she get back into Indonesia? The next passport request isn’t until 1/4/72 to “return home”.

        • Joan of Arc received a Vision that “DROVE HER” ..you/ me/ LC ?
          to RID the USA from Death & Dying? & was made the head of her
          army & Inspired a Defeated Nation. “my hero” pop-eye… of sorts.
          Born 1-6-1412 & died 5-30-1431 at about 19 years.

    • Do note also that in late April 1964, he states he’s married to Ann Dunham for the first time. I think he was filing for an extension which was eventually denied. Sr. also becomes 2 years younger when he wants to go to Harvard.

      Ann Dunham claims they were divorced in March 1964 when she and Lolo were pleading for an extension. Apparently the INS detected somewhere she was using the surname Obama, though it isn’t disclosed anywhere, unless its in the (b) (6) redactions.

      • Speaking of redactions, in Sr’s records, Harvard official’s names are also blacked out in some instances. Guess they didn’t want us to see those connections.

      • We found conflicting dates for when she and Lolo supposedly married. She said March 1964 somewhere, then it became 1965. IF it really was 1964, then based upon her divorce papers from BHO Sr., she was a bigamist, too, because the date she gave for her marriage to Lolo was before her divorce was final. So in April 1964, Lolo said he was married to Ann?

        • No sorry for the confusion, Sr affirmed it on an extension request. He admits to having a wife, Ann Obama, USc and a son, BHO 2nd, USc. (I think when he was pleading to stay to finish his doctorate). He seemed desparate at that time, iirc.

          But all the previous ones he denied having a wife. ~ He may have mentioned Kezia and “Roy” and one point though…

          Its really a good read because he had an extension effective 8/8/61 and never mentioned his new born. In another place he states that she and her son live with her parents and he lives elsewhere which conflicts with the Birth Announcements since the child was just born.

          • BHO Sr. states in April 1964 he’s married with a 2 year old son. On that record someone makes a note “separated last 2 months”.

          • page 36 (8/31/61) he does state on the application that he has a wife but it looks like he forgot her name. No child information, though.

        • http://www.scribd.com/doc/59560239/FOIA-Release-Records-Relating-to-Barry-Soetoro-Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Barack-Obama-Sr-Lolo-Soetoro-Department-of-Homeland-Security

          page 15 (4/29/64) Married/ Legally Separated 2 months
          page 28 (8/17/62) Married, no wife’s name, but a child named Roy
          page 35 (8/31/61) Notes son born 8/4/61, doesn’t live with family

          • Page 40 – he says he was married on February 2, 1961 to SAD, from Seattle Washington

            Okay that’s enough. I’m way off topic… just wanted to clarify the cross referencing… and because I can’t help myself, there’s notes that say they believe he may be married to someone in Cambridge, too. That may have been suspected due to Ruth’s mother’s incessant phone calls. But who knows. He doesn’t seem to be a very truthful person for whatever reasons.

  17. “BIG Papi” 38…. slips another one by OUR LEADER (usurper)
    of the
    NOT so FREE WORLD any-mo’ …let me count the ways…
    when will O’
    be STOPPED? & by WHOM? ALL about ME a “SELFIE-KING”


  18. michaels cure 4 FAT KIDS..Oh-PITS’.. & I-DON’T-FEEL-comfortable
    DADDY….. help me I’m melting….. & the hand jive continues….


  19. Hilarious, Zenway.

    (I thought Megyn Kelly’s outfit and position on camera was disgusting on Friday night, btw.)

  20. O O O ….this is so GOOD a # 10 … lots 2 gander & ponder….


  21. IS OOOO a P S Y C H O P A T H ??? ….. don’ ASK!!!! PERIOD.


  22. Sorry not to have seen this post earlier. It is quite interesting. Just a note: I believe that the term is Consul General, not Chief Consul. Isn’t the term Chief Counsel used to describe legal representation of some sort? The Consul General is the American official in charge of a city that’s not the capital of a country. The Ambassador resides in the capital, e.g. New York vs. Washington DC.

    • Thanks

    • Yankeegirl! Hey, how are ya? You’re probably right about the titles. I was just making that one up. What I meant was that as head of the office, he probably wouldn’t be called a vice consul. If you know, would somebody in charge of the consular office and also the political office be, in essence, in charge of the whole shebang? Like Consul General? Except I believe that Jakarta is the capital of the country.

  23. The GAYSTAPO hounds a man out of his job as CEO of Mozilla because 6 years ago he donated to Prop. 8 against gay marriage–a state of mind that Barry ALLEGEDLY shared at the same time: Marriage is one man and one woman. MOZILLA should be ashamed. Is there a decent alternative to their products? http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/07/is-intimidation-to-blame-for-ouster-mozilla-chief-over-gay-marriage/

    Amazingly enough, SOME of the progressives oppose this pogrom and attack on FREE THOUGHT, not to mention speech.

    • Firefox is conservative’s alternative to google. More control with as ons. Best way to take it over is to rally those Christians and conservatives to boycot FF. Stage one fire opposers and begin restructuring. Stage two many users say goodbye and they think it their individual choice based on conviction that they leave. Stage three model after google and begin control of users.

      Gay marriage was the issue used to get takeover of FF. A takeover from within. Classic model.

      • The IRS leaked the information so you know there were many high-level meetings on that treachery..

        • http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/04/mozilla-ceo-fired-after-obama-irs-leaks-his-prop-8-donation-to-radical-gay-group/

          They can pretend all they want that there married. Have at it.
          But they are not. Impossible. Partnership, yes. Marriage, impossible.

          When I go to a restaurant and ask for salt and pepper, 2 shakers of salt is not going to cut it.

        • Wow. I didn’t know all that back story. So Mozilla knuckled under to a threat of a boycott from the Gaystapo. It’s disappointing that he resigned and that Mozilla did that mea culpa. WHY DID THEY? Especially if conservatives support them. What are we to do now? Concede? http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/10/03/irs-must-be-held-responsible-for-leaking-national-organization-for-marriage/

          “But HRC wanted more. They wanted access to NOM’s confidential list of donors, lists that NOM is required to file with the IRS but are not public information.

          Then, the president of HRC was named a national co-chair for the Obama reelection campaign and, magically, NOM’s tax return and its confidential list of donors and their addresses showed-up on the HRC website.

          The campaign of harassment and intimidation that had been tried and perfected in the fight over California’s Proposition 8 could now begin again in the 2012 election cycle.

          That effort succeeded.

          Donations to NOM and to the ballot campaigns then underway became increasingly hard to come by, to the point that the same-sex marriage forces were able to outspend NOM and its allies by more than $20 million dollars (a nearly 4 to 1 advantage) in the 4 states where marriage was on the ballot in November 2012, resulting in the first electoral losses for traditional marriage ever. (In contrast, despite being opposed by the heavyweights of the Democrat Party, including President Obama and former President Clinton, the amendment to defend traditional marriage in North Carolina passed in May 2012 by more than 20 points—a landslide in a state that President Obama had carried in 2008).

          Unauthorized disclosure of a tax return is a serious felony, punishable by up to five years in prison.

          Shortly after HRC posted the illegally-obtained tax returns on its website, NOM demanded an investigation by the Department of Justice and the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

          We know that an investigation occurred – NOM was given a case number, and its principal officers were interviewed.

          And we know that the tax return on HRC’s website originated from within the IRS because it had been redacted to hide internal codes that are placed on documents only after they are received by the IRS.

          But eighteen months later, no criminal charges have been filed, and the IRS now takes the position that the release of the identity of the culprit is itself barred by the same federal statute that the culprit violated.

          “Tax return information” includes investigations into violations of the IRS laws, and the investigation of the IRS itself for illegal disclosure of tax returns is therefore protected by the very same law that the IRS violated. Or so the IRS argues.

          George Orwell could not be more proud.”

          And what does Congress do? Nada.

          • Its Fascism. Nothing soft or velvet about it.

            Its new and improved.
            Treason against another targeted American, a sovereign entity.

            Full Definition of FASCISM 1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social …

          • What are we to do now? Concede?

            No, I don’t thinks so. I think its more like lay down and play dead. Apologize or we’ll kill you.

      • Thanks WAH. I was using Bing and someone suggested DuckDuckGo so I thought I’d ask. 🙂

  24. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Much to catch up on, But in the meantime, she doesn’t go there, but this is pretty good. My apologies if this has been shared here before.

  25. GLOBE….. Impeach OBAMA! Lies, Cover-Ups & Abuse of POWER
    …. @ your news stands NOW!


  26. O’ … Rate the Psych-O-path : a New Game…
    & open more of the photos of O-MO kiss-kiss .. in Comments +


    • Fun Night… so bring yo’ WALLETS…. Spielberg … really?????
      O to get … “ambassador to humanity award ” ….. ?


      • Is that a late April Fools’ joke or just another of Spielberg’s fantasies?

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        I will never condemn Jewish people as a whole, just as I can never paint ALL black people with a broad stroke. I have both black and Jewish friends who are conservative, patriotic and who all cherish American ideals. We would be blessed to have Allen West or Ben Carson as POTUS! But I cannot comprehend how some liberal Jews are so blind! Orthodox Jews seem to be a lot more clued in to what’s going on.

        Acts 7:51

        Again, I will never, ever paint every individual of any religion/race with the same myopic brush. My Lord and Savior was a Jewish rabbi; clearly, they’ve been blind before. Pray for them to come around.

        An interesting perspective (I” remember to paste the link this time 😉 )


        • American Jews are not Israelis, therefore, do not need to keep gas masks in their handbags and one eye open to sleep.
          ~ ~
          The gall to be so hateful toward human beings. just like the cone of silence regarding the daily massacre of Christians. Jews and Christians need to go and government pretends not to notice. Especially, their good friends the Syrian “rebels” who are really foreigners invading Syria.

          The UN is a pack of lying killers.

        • Good article Rosemary. 🙂

          I always say that Jesus, Our Lord, and his Mother never had an inkling that they were Christians. They were Jews and Jesus brought us the Good News of the “New Covenant”.

          St. Paul never even met Jesus. He was in today’s Syria when he had a vision. Amazing Grace. I once was blind, but now I see.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s