Truth, Lies, and Hate

screenprint - Copy
Above is a screen print from a video in a story at The Gateway Pundit.  This video was edited out of the film Hating Breitbart, for reasons of length and saliency; but it’s being released now in response to a continuing false attack on the late Andrew Breitbart and James O’Keefe.  The Southern Poverty Law Center published an article accusing Breitbart and O’Keefe of “hobnobbing with white nationalists.”

The Gateway Pundit explained that this attack is without merit, in a previous story:

All of this is ancient history though, so why did the SPLC attack a dead man out of the clear blue? It’s because they’re carrying water for progressive race baiters and known rapists (of innocent people’s reputations) Max Blumenthal and obscure blogger Daryle Jenkins. …

There’s a scene in the film where Breitbart very publicly calls Max Blumenthal out for his attempted rape of O’Keefe’s and Breitbart’s reputations. The humiliation was so complete that Blumenthal was forced to issue a correction that would’ve more honestly been called a retraction …

So basically because James O’Keefe helped someone set up a table at a debate on race issues, the Southern Poverty Law Center is insinuating O’Keefe is a racist organizer. …

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) purports to identify and track hate organizations (although oddly enough they don’t list most Islamist groups as haters).  The SPLC has influence in our government far beyond what they deserve:

Judicial Watch obtained Defense Department training materials  … that described conservative and civil liberties organizations as “hate groups.”

The training materials used by the Air Force were created to help students “recognize extremists ideologies.” The materials identified conservative values, such as individual liberties and states’ rights, as recruiting rhetoric used by “extremists.” …

The documents were published by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute in January 2013. They cited the leftwing Southern Poverty Law Center repeatedly as a source to use when identifying hate groups.

The SPLC also labeled a group of black pastors as a “hate group” because they oppose gay activists:

A coalition of African-American pastors and pro-family Christian and Jewish leaders held a press conference outside the headquarters of the Southern Poverty Law Center in Montgomery, Alabama, to protest the SPLC’s smearing of pro-family groups that oppose homosexual activism as “hate groups.”

The SPLC has been co-opted by a Leftist, pro-homosexual, anti-Christian agenda. If you don’t agree with the SPLC leftist litmus test, then you are a de facto “hate group.” With its new definition of what constitutes a hate group, the SPLC has become a fund-raising machine. It’s no wonder that the organization is flush with cash. At the end of fiscal year 2010 SPLC’s endowment stood at $216.2 million. Ultimately, the tactic is to strike fear in middle-America so the checks keep rolling in.

Similarly false accusations by the SPLC led directly to a hateful terroristic attack on yet another Christian group:

Family Research Council (FRC) officials released video of federal investigators questioning convicted domestic terrorist Floyd Lee Corkins II, who explained that he attacked the group’s headquarters because the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) identified them as a “hate group” due to their traditional marriage views.

“Southern Poverty Law lists anti-gay groups,” Corkins tells interrogators in the video, which FRC obtained from the FBI. “I found them online, did a little research, went to the website, stuff like that.”

The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard reported that Corkins, who pleaded guilty to terrorism charges, said in court that he hoped to “kill as many as possible and smear the Chick-Fil-A sandwiches in victims’ faces, and kill the guard.” As Bedard explained, “the shooting occurred after an executive with Chick-Fil-A announced his support for traditional marriage, angering same-sex marriage proponents.”

While the SPLC pretends to be concerned with monitoring hate groups and educating people about hate groups, some believe otherwise, because their “director of intelligence” [sic] says:

Sometimes the press will describe us as monitoring hate crimes and so on … I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, to completely destroy them.

Completely destroying groups with whom one disagrees  politically or on a religious basis, after falsely labeling them “hate groups”?  That certainly sounds un-American and rather hateful.  Bradlee Dean explains:

This is all coming from an organization that uses a façade of legitimacy (a law firm that advocates un-law). Of course, it does this with misuse of language and subtly changing definitions of widely understood and accepted terms (reversing definitions). As you know, the socialist-communist agenda has always had a problem with how to defend and promote an indefensible agenda, dedicating themselves by covertly undermining and ultimately destroying American society as to implementing socialism/communism.

Who are the true haters?

Which groups pose a real existential threat to our Republic?


142 responses to “Truth, Lies, and Hate

  1. ~ “SUB-PAR O” …. get your self 2 a 12 step program soon!
    Check the shot of O & biden… the hairline looked close shaved ?
    & the girly photo O looks like Joel GRAY ~ fun to watch video above

    • I’m waiting for this one:
      “9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would cause their teeth to burst into flames as they shouted, “WE TOL’ YOU DAT BITCH WAS CRAZY!””

  2. ~ O’ Lord .. ” The PUSHER MAN” … ( & whom could THAT B?)
    A D ( talkin’ TRUTH at 67 dare WE LISTEN?

    • That one takes me back. It occurs to me that when they design the Obama Monument for the National Mall, they can incribe upon its base these noteworthy and awe-inspiring words:

      I had learned not to care.

      Pot had helped, and booze, maybe a little blow.

      When I was a kid, I inhaled. That was the point.

    • They should just abolish the EPA. And the NLRB, the NSA, the IRS, the DOE.

      Here’s another example:

      “… The [MISSOURI] Senate voted 23-10 to send Nieves‘ legislation, dubbed the “Second Amendment Preservation Act,” to the House. It would declare some federal gun laws to be null and void in Missouri. Federal agents knowingly enforcing those laws could face civil penalties and prosecution under a newly created state crime punishable by up to a year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

      The legislation doesn’t state which specific federal laws would be nullified, but refers to fees, registration and tracking policies that “have a chilling effect on the purchase or ownership” of guns and ammunition by law-abiding citizens. …”

  3. Corporate Takeover & Geopolitics ~Show Audio ~Date 09-17-12
    Host : George Noory ~ Guests: Craig B Hulet

    Analyst of geopolitics & foreign policy, Craig B. Hulet talked about how corporate interests now dominate over governments, & the fallout we’re seeing from this around the world. He characterized the US as a surveillance state, & bemoaned the loss of personal liberties; yet the public, suffering from the recession, has not made much of an outcry, he observed. Regarding military conflicts, America will go to war “over & over again, for only one purpose, & that is the self-interest of the wealthy, & most powerful corporations,” he commented. In the years to come, Hulet believes we’ll see a Violent Reaction of Citizens against the corporate government that is “as feudal as anything the Middle Ages ever produced.” Of the 100 largest economies in the world, 51 of them are corporations,
    not nation states, he added.

    Discussing the recent attack in Libya, he suggested that it was well planned & was essentially unrelated to the controversial American film that has been protested there. The Muslim people are objecting to the American corporate government’s control in their region, he argued. Archer Daniels Midland & Monsanto, & a host of other US & western corporations, are buying up land in North Africa, running the locals off, & planning enormous farms & use of infrastructure there, he reported. Further, he said that military hardware that’s being pulled out of Iraq and Afghanistan is going to Italy (so that the US can be prepared to invade North Africa via Libya) and Uzbekistan (to serve as a buffer between Russia and China, when the US takes over Iran).

    Hulet’s vision of America in the next 15 years is as a kind of “high tech medieval feudalism based on the ancient principles of mercantilism.
    There’ll be no free enterprise, but there will be a bizarre kind of managed competition. But for the folks down here at the bottom, there’s nothing more autocratic than the corporatism that the largest multi-nationals practice.” This corporate government has every corner of the world mapped out for their control, & is capable of Crushing anyone who gets in their Way, he lamented.

    • If ANYONE can listen to last nights SHOW….. IT explains ALL WE
      NEED 2 KNOW… just put our feet up were really…. in deep do-do

      Craig B Hulet has been working on his newest book for years and it
      will be coming OUT SOON…. I will READ every page twice… this man
      knows we are a goner… and why & how … it CAME DOWN …. he’s a
      great AMERICAN…. he’s is my HERO… with an answer Thanks, CBH

      • CRAIG B HULET….. lots to digest… & get back 2 me… ok

        • Hiya Zenway.

          I just checked out the site real quick– I am still on the coast to coast site. 🙂
          Oliver Stone admires him. I have to check that out.

          Thanks for the heads up and as always, your work and due diligence.
          Plus, UARrrrrrrssssssssSoooooo Funnneeee! 2

          (i was just going to link the Good Fellows “I’m funny?” Youtube scene especially 4 you, but after listening to it I thought better of it. 😉
          ItS a RiOt…like U. rofl

          • I love that scene, Papoose. Joe Pesci is one in a million. I haven’t caught up with the comments yet. Are you all talking about George Noory? Here’s an interesting synchronicity. Ran into an old friend who’s a HUGE lib. Voted for Clinton, Hillary in primaries, BHO twice. Hated GWB. Suddenly, he’s talking about Nouri and how he heard on Coast to Coast that our military is as much as 40% FOREIGNERS, who sign up (actually are recruited) in order to get citizenship, eventually. THEY, he said, won’t be reluctant to fire on U.S. citizens, should that order be given. He also said that he personally knows someone who was asked THE question: “Will you give an order to fire on U.S. citizens?” Having said no, the guy was told he wouldn’t be promoted ever again.

            Suddenly, the libs and progressives are waking up.

        • YIKES…. this stuff is killing me….. Over-Lap

      • This Craig Hulet dude sounds like a good read , sort of like the book I’m reading now…King of the mountain” by Charles Crismier…..that I just mentioned. Charles is a lawyer,or I should say was a practiced lawyer for many years, but is now a minister. THese guys seem to be somewhat on the same page. I’ll check out mr. hulet for sure.

    • I get it.

      and, Obamacare is their lasso.

  4. If the SS # does NOT MATCH…. IT does NOT MATCH…. O?
    plus the comments also have some ideas to ponder…. a spell or 2

  5. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Rosemary’s Baby, for realz….

  6. PONDER here O’s Cousin? Dr Milton Wolf has a video.. +more stuff

  7. All those Kiddies that voted for him will be so pleased. 😀

    because a lot people don’t have the money to spend on this.
    Obama: Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, young people can stay on their parents’ insurance until they are 26. But once they hit 26, they’re on their own and a lot of young people think they are invincible. But the truth is, young people are knuckleheads, you know? They’re the ones who are cooking for the first time and slice their finger open. They’re dancing on the bar stool. They’re, you know.

    • They can call it “work product” or whatever they want to call it.

      They deleted evidence as well as time line – if they wanted it protected, they should have had it sealed.

      Obstruction of Justice, loud and clear.


    There’s an amazing open letter to Barry from a wounded warrior. I wonder how they’re going to punish him for speaking the truth? A sample:

    “… Mr. Obama, even though we share extreme opposite views, we have one thing in common, we both attended school in Hawaii. However, that’s where the similarities end. You see, as you attended your exclusive, private school, I would ride my bike to Kaimuki High school in one of the roughest areas in Hawaii every morning and would ride past Punahou, the exclusive private school you attended. I would notice the Bentleys, Maserati’s, and fancy foreign cars that all the kids were dropped off in; wow it must have been extremely rough in Hawaii living that life, right? I could only imagine what it was like to have that kind of money. Fortunately for you, not many people are aware of the school and the upper classcitizens who attended it. The tuition to attend your exclusive, private school was more than it cost me to obtain a Bachelor’s degree in Architecture from the University of Arizona. You talk a big game when it comes to financial inequality, yet I’m quite sure you have no idea what it’s truly like to have sacrifice. You were one of the elitist children in Hawaii.

    After High School, we each chose very different paths. You were able to attend Ivy League schools, and I sought out a military career to in hopes of earning a degree. What we have in life as children usually sets the tone for what we will face later in life that will make us successful. I worked to get where I am today, and YOU WERE HANDED IT….Mr. Inequality. …”

    • In the Mia Marie Pope interview she talks about being a kid in the late 70’s hanging out with Barry Soetoro.

      She states the weird fact that no one could just enter Punahou under any circumstances. She believes he was plucked from somewhere and enrolled under special circumstances. She also has memories of the grandparent’s apartment and also seeing the mother from time to time. Some stories do say that she was in Hawaii for a few years in the mid 70s.

      On another thread there is a timeline form some Philly paper. She was in Hawaii from1972 through 1976. Her whereabouts are missing for 1976 but she shows up back in Jakarta in March of 1977 at the National Museum/ Economics Lecturer at the University of Indonesia. By June 1977 she’s a Consultant at the International Labor Organization (ILO) in Yogyakarta. Then by September she’s on a UH East-West grant “researching” and weaving.

      Its a great interview about the Won and how he was viewed by his peers at the time.


    This is good. The FBI is being asked to answer to Congress how they do their “routine” reviews, the type of which put D’Souza in the crosshairs.

    Texas Sec. of State is being called to account concerning potential criminal deeds by Barry’s peeps.

  10. RUN>>>>>ORLY<<<<<<< RUN!!!!!!!

    They seem to be BLOCKING….. OUR PROGRESS…. can't put it on
    NEWEST …. LINK???? NASTY…. BOYS!!!!

  11. SHUT UP … they Explained….

    (someone may have tried to bring this over ? or so MALWARE says
    so… I will PUT IT HERE! It seems to let it work? HEY GORDO….??
    Whatt’s up?? are “they” attacking us?)

    • That’s an excellent article, Zenway. Thanks for linking it. Excellent. It wasn’t just that your link was broken, the entire website was subject to a malware warning. Maybe it’s fixed now, but I went through the “startpage” proxy to read the story.

    • See, I click your link and I still get a warning message. Here’s the proxy link. Click here.

    • FOOTNOTES: bottom of page … One of many articles with Eleanor C. N.
      from above…
      16 Eleanor C. Nordyke, “Blacks in Hawai’i: A Demographic and Historical Perspective,” The Hawaiian Journal of History, volume 22 (1988), 243.

      17 This statement was based on Richard A. Greer, “Blacks in Old Hawaii,” Honolulu. Nov, 1986: 120-121, 183-184. … old History long ago… O’

  12. Somebody’s telling:

    “One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents.

    Over the last several weeks, I worked with NBC News to publish a series of articles about “dirty trick” tactics used by GCHQ’s previously secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group). These were based on four classified GCHQ documents presented to the NSA and the other three partners in the English-speaking “Five Eyes” alliance. Today, we at the Intercept are publishing another new JTRIG document, in full, entitled “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations”. …”


      “In the annals of internet conspiracy theories, none is more pervasive than the one speculating paid government plants infiltrate websites, social network sites, and comment sections with an intent to sow discord, troll, and generally manipulate, deceive and destroy reputations. Guess what: it was all true. …”

      As if we didn’t know already.

      • “National security experts say that both the U.S. and British operations are within the scope of their respective national laws. When the Washington Post reported on the MUSCULAR program, the NSA said in a statement that it is “focused on discovering and developing intelligence about valid foreign intelligence targets only” and that it uses “Attorney General-approved processes to protect the privacy of U.S. persons.”

        But privacy experts and former government officials say the lack of disclosure by the intelligence agencies inspires public fear that rights of privacy, free speech and dissent have been infringed.

        “Governments have no business knowing which YouTube videos everyone in the world is watching,” said Chris Soghoian, chief technologist for the ACLU. “It’s one thing to spy on a particular person who has done something to warrant a government investigation but governments have no business monitoring the Facebook likes or YouTube views of hundreds of millions of people.”

        It might also have a chilling effect on companies like Google. Jason Healey, former White House cyber czar under George W. Bush, says U.S. and British intelligence encroachment on the internet is a threat to everyone, including social media companies.”

        It seems to me that these private companies have a proprietary, commercial interest in all of this data and that the data BELONGS TO THEM, if not to the individuals about whom it concerns. It therefore seems to me that these governments have committed THEFT and therefore can be charged criminally or at least sued civilly and made to pay HUGE settlements. Why aren’t the trial lawyers on these potential class action suits? How is this ANY different from government agents burglarizing the offices of corporations and stealing information?

  13. From that link, which I also posted above:

    NBC (why them?!!) reveals “key, discrete revelations: the monitoring of YouTube and Blogger, the targeting of Anonymous with the very same DDoS attacks they accuse “hacktivists” of using, the use of “honey traps” (luring people into compromising situations using sex) and destructive viruses.”

    General Allen? Petraeus?

    “Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; [birthers?] and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. [NLP? Alinsky tactics? And worse?]

    To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), [Orly can relate to this one.] fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.”

    They have the capability to place “incriminating” stuff on “your” social media sites, and they DO IT, without qualms. So what else can they do? Place it ON YOUR COMPUTER. Have no doubt. They can do it. Now the NSA claims this is only to target legitimate enemies of the country. But even IF that’s so, what prevents their minions from “going rogue” and using the same capabilities and methods to target POLITICAL “ENEMIES”? Nothing. See what the IRS does. And did successfully, in 2012.

    “In fact, the discussion of many of these techniques occurs in the context of using them in lieu of “traditional law enforcement” against people suspected (but not charged or convicted) of ordinary crimes or, more broadly still, “hacktivism”, meaning those who use online protest activity for political ends.”

    Of course, we’re supposed to believe this is only done overseas and to target people who risk our national security, BUT this is an administration that has used these same tactics to DEMONIZE AND DESTROY THE REPUTATION OF THE TEA PARTY, and then used the IRS to target them (one target believes her information was hacked and stolen, iirc), and uses their FALSE poor reputation to justify labeling them “potential domestic terrorists” who endanger, potentially, the national security of the country. So …

    Welcome to the GULAG.

    The writer brings up what we’ve talked about many times before: How this is basically a dream of Cass Sunstein, who now is Barry’s “Goebbels”, according to Greenwald.

    Government plans to monitor and influence internet communications, and covertly infiltrate online communities in order to sow dissension and disseminate false information, have long been the source of speculation. Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, a close Obama adviser and the White House’s former head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, wrote a controversial paper in 2008 proposing that the US government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites, as well as other activist groups.

    Sunstein also proposed sending covert agents into “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups” which spread what he views as false and damaging “conspiracy theories” about the government. Ironically, the very same Sunstein was recently named by Obama to serve as a member of the NSA review panel created by the White House, one that – while disputing key NSA claims – proceeded to propose many cosmetic reforms to the agency’s powers (most of which were ignored by the President who appointed them).”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s