Being Necessary to the Security of a FREE State

© Miri WTPOTUS December 17, 2012

Bill of Rights - Copy

As we saw after the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords, the progressive left can very quickly ramp up their propaganda machine–they’re ready, willing, and able to politicize the tragic murder of innocents in Newtown, Connecticut

They have mobilized the complicit mainstream media; sent out the talking points to the Journolist (or its current incarnation) to shape the “narrative;” prepared hasty legislation  to ban “assault weapons” and limit ammunition sales, ownership, importation, and production; and called for a “commission” of unelected individuals to look into these shootings (no doubt focusing mainly on gun control)–all before the facts are in.

One wonders what part of “SHALL not be infringed” they don’t comprehend.

The progressive left wasted no time organizing an astroturfed protest outside the White House, just as after the Giffords shooting.  President Obama interjected himself into the memorial service for the victims, just as after the Giffords shooting, where that event was curiously “branded” and seemed more like a “pep rally“, complete with slogan-imprinted t-shirts, than a funeral.

Make no mistake.  The progressive leftists will not let a “serious crisis go to waste.”  How’s this for heartlessness?  [emphasis added to quotes]

Gun-rights activists recoil at the practice of harnessing tragedy to promote a political agenda.

To many of their opponents, there is no better moment to combat the gun violence than when the wounds are still fresh  …

Nothing is more powerful than a classroom of kindergarten kids getting killed by assault weapons,” says Bob Edgar, a preacher and former Democratic Congressman who is now the president and CEO of the liberal advocacy group Common Cause. Or, as a government employee who wandered over to the vigil from work put it:

“It helps that it was a bunch of white children in a school.”

It helps.  The deaths of white children in school “helps” them; therefore, they will use the deaths of innocents to promote their political agenda, ensuring that they don’t “waste” a “serious crisis.”  Let the demonizing begin:

[Democrat] Rep. Jerry Nadler said … that the president has only one option.

“There’s only one meaningful action he can take, which is to take on the N.R.A., label them as the enablers of mass murderers they are, really push for strong gun-control legislation and call out those congressional leaders who don’t support it. … It is time to call out the N.R.A. as enablers of mass murder and start embarrassing people and saying, ‘Who do you stand with? The parents and children of this country or the potential mass murderers?’”

At least Nadler didn’t, like Harry Belafonte, suggest that Obama should imprison his opponents like a Third World dictatorYet.

In the same vein, progressives plan a march on the NRA, as if the more than 200 million gun-owning, law-abiding citizens of the USA are somehow to blame for these murders.  Mayor Bloomberg alarmingly opined:

It’s time for the president, I think, to stand up and lead and tell this country what we should donot go to Congress and say, ‘What do you guys want to do?’ … What the president can do is number one, through executive action, he can order his agencies to to enforce the laws more aggressively.

The president of the United States is NOT a dictator.  He does NOT “tell this country what we should do.”

He has no constitutional power to legislate.  We the People RULE in this country.  The Congress are OUR REPRESENTATIVES.  As such, they are the deciders–not the president.  They write and pass legislation.  Obama’s only job with regard to legislation is to sign it or veto it when it reaches his desk.  Obama MUST ask the Congress what they want to do.  He does NOT rule via executive order, either, at least not constitutionally.

Never let a serious crisis go to waste, “by any means necessary.”  The goal of the gun control activists of the progressive left is to incrementally disarm the US population and thereby gut the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Make no mistake, Hitleresque confiscation of all guns is their end game. Without disarming the citizens of the US, the progressive left (aka the communist collectivist socialists) will not be able to IMPOSE their dreamed-of new world order, their fundamental communistic transformation of the United States of America.

Why the selective outrage?  If leftists were truly concerned about gun violence and its root causes, then they would address all gun violence, not just mass shootings of a “bunch of white children.”  Where is their outrage over murders that happen every day, all across this country?

In September 2012, thirty-eight people were shot, 3 shot dead, over just one weekend in Chicago.  Thirty-three homicides by gunshot in Chicago over one month this year (11/9/12-12/9/12). Where is President Obama?  Where is the Democrat call for a commission to study the root causes of gun violence in Chicago and how to stop it? Why is there so much gun violence in Chicago, Obama’s “hometown”?

Recently, a federal appeals court struck down Chicago’s ban on carrying concealed weapons, as unconstitutional. Despite  rampant gun violence in Chicago, Chicago is one city that has extremely strict gun control laws (an assault weapon ban as well as registration of handguns).  Washington DC also has very strict gun control laws, yet both cities continue to have high rates of gun violence and gun homicides.

Connecticut also has strict gun control laws, yet that did not stop the shooting in Newtown.  The perpetrator stole the weapons, so he used them illegally. There have been various reports about the types of weapons the shooter used.  As well, there have been conflicting stories about whether or not the shooter used a high-powered rifle or whether that gun was left behind in his car.  But the media never allow facts to get in the way of a good progressive, leftist meme, so they will blame assault weapons and ammunition, and not the shooter’s obvious mental illness or the school’s lack of security.

Guns are forbidden on school property, so that gun control law failed to stop this crime.  What  might have stopped it?  An armed security guard or an armed and trained teacher.  Or simply locked school and classroom doors.  These are logical, common sense solutions promoted by those with the most experience dealing with criminals and gun violence:  law enforcement officers:

St. Louis County Police Chief Tim Fitch says it is time to talk about arming civilian school personnel following Friday’s massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, comparing it to arming airline pilots after September 11, 2001.

“I see it no differently,” he said. “Pilots have been armed now for many many years, we’ve not had another hijacking and the issue is, for the bad guy, he doesn’t know which airplane he’s getting on, if the pilot is armed or not.”

Fitch said the killing will not be stopped by legislation or laws.

“If there’s somebody that’s really hellbent on doing something like this, they’re not going to care what the law is.” …

Concerning the possibility of gun control, Fitch said “it’s just not going to happen,” and called for an increased focus on mental health instead. …

We know this individual has a mental health history in Connecticut, we’ve seen that in all the school shootings, and additional resources would be helpful.

Police chief Fitch echoed words spoken in a seminar two years ago:

[Lt. Col. Dave] Grossman said that agencies and officers, although facing an uphill slog against the denial of the general public, must diligently work toward increasing understanding among the sheep that the wolves are coming for their children.

Police officers must train and drill with teachers, not only so responding officers are intimately familiar with the facilities, but so that teachers know what they can do in the event of an attack. …

Grossman said that if the school administrators at Columbine had spent a fraction of the money they’d spent preparing for fire — if the teachers there had spent a fraction of the time they spent preparing for fire — doing lockdown drills and talking with local law enforcers about the violent dangers they face, the outcome that day may have been different.

Grossman said (and most cops agree) that many of the most important things we can do to protect our kids would cost us nothing or next-to-nothing.

Among Lt. Col. Grossman’s suggestions?

Put police officers in schools, because with just one officer assigned to a school, the probability of a mass murder in that school drops to almost zero.

Ensure that the school/classroom have just a single point of entry. Simply locking the back door helps create a hard target.

Conduct your active shooter drills within (and in partnership with) the schools in your city so teachers know how to respond, and know what it looks like when you do your response.

Armed citizens can help.  … Whatever your personal take on gun control, it is all but certain that a killer set on killing is more likely to attack a target where the citizens are unarmed, rather than one where they are likely to encounter an armed citizen response.

We must prepare for violence like the firefighter prepares for fire. And we must do that today.

Do we try to prevent fires by calling for a ban on electricity, matches, lighters, or anything else that causes fires?  Obviously not.

Do we try to prevent drunk driving deaths by calling for a ban on automobiles or alcohol?  Obviously  not.

So why do leftists, in knee jerk fashion, cry “gun control!” whenever a crime like this occurs?  Why do they  focus on the inanimate object instead of on the agency of the shooter, his motives, his mental illness, or upon how to prevent such deaths through better training and better security at schools?

Because their goal is gun confiscation. They merely use these “serious” crises as an EXCUSE to promote their Hitleresque agenda.

What might stop some of the murders in Chicago? A populace that is not unconstitutionally banned  from carrying weapons outside their homes.

The school in Newtown had a new security system.  And yet, their “security system” failed. The shooter allegedly broke a window to get in.  (If true. The news media continue to report contradictory “facts”.)

Some security system if someone can merely break a window to gain access, while carrying a huge rifle and wearing combat clothing! 

What went wrong? That remains to be seen.  Inadequate security or poor training, but taking guns and ammunition away from law-abiding citizens will not prevent school shootings.

To those who are against armed security guards in schools or against allowing school employees with concealed carry permits to carry weapons into schools, I say this:

Let’s disarm all bodyguards, then.  No Hollywood leftists should have armed guards.  Disarm the Secret Service.  Disarm them all.  Why are the lives of Hollywood leftists and DC politicians more important than the lives of precious, innocent school children?

To those who say schools should not be fortresses, I say this:

Take all the locks off your own doors. Leave your doors wide open.  Disarm your security systems.  Why do you make your home a fortress?

We need to be reasonable and not allow leftists and gun control activists to use this “serious crisis” to further their political agendas.

When the Founders wrote the right to keep and bear arms into the Constitution, they knew exactly what they were doing:  Ensuring the SECURITY of a FREE state.

Once We the People are disarmed, only the government and criminals will have weapons.  Once the elite government class are the only ones with weapons, then they can impose upon the People whatever tyrannical regime they like.  Remember what happened in Nazi Germany.  Don’t fall for their propaganda.


h/t Bridgette, What a Hoot, Rosemary Woodhouse, and all the other commenters who tipped us to links mentioned in this post.  Sorry if I missed anyone.

67 responses to “Being Necessary to the Security of a FREE State

  1. New post for information about the shooting and news about the attempts to take away our Second Amendment rights.

  2. Flashback: English Warned Us Not To Hand Over Our Guns……And We Won’t!!
    Michael CHILDS, December 17, 2012

    It’s Godlessness behind these shootings. –The guns did not hop up and kill these children.

    Every place where they enacted gun bans and control have had crimes run rampart and the citizens are the ones that pay the price because they are the ones that are left to protect their homes and family’s with nothing but harsh words and perhaps a knife or two!

    Obama and his dog Holder need to be recycled back to the Communist regime they got turned lose from.

    People in Australia and England to name just two are telling us that gun control don’t work, and if you remember history Hitler almost concurred all of Europe because the people had given up their guns and could not mount any kind of defense, perhaps that is what Obama is hoping for here in the United States, weaken our economy then get rid of our second amendment, which was written into our Constitution to protect us from people like Obama who want to concur from within.

    When are the Political going to honor their oaths of office and protect the people and our Constitution and make this once again the land of the free?
    Liberals love to blame “things” instead of the criminals because criminals CAN be held accountable and they don’t want to lose voters by putting them in prison! Besides, lawyers can’t sue someone that has no money. They would rather sue the companies that make the “things”!

    • British Warning “Our Gun Ban caused 40% jump in Gun Crime” DON’T GIVE UP YOUR GUNS!

    • It’s evil. Unless human intervention caused that shooter to do what he did, then I can truly believe in demonic possession. Look at his face. The face in the photo that is not being publicized. Instead, they’re showing us a photo from when he was in elementary school, as with Trayvon Martin.

      That is the face of evil. His actions were the actions of EVIL. It wasn’t the method. It was the perpetrator.

      Of course they want to take the guns (300 million of them) so that We the People “can’t mount any defense.” That’s it exactly. Then we are defenseless.

  3. High court fight looms over right to carry a gun
    December 16, 2012 Snip

    The next big issue in the national debate over guns — whether people have a right to be armed in public — is moving closer to Supreme Court review. A provocative ruling by a panel of federal appeals court judges in Chicago struck down the only statewide ban on carrying concealed weapons, in Illinois. The ruling is somewhat at odds with those of other federal courts that have largely upheld state and local gun laws, including restrictions on concealed weapons, since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling declaring that people have a right to have a gun for self-defense.
    The Second Amendment talks about “the right to keep and bear arms and it’s as if some courts want to take giant eraser to the words `and bear’ and pretend that they’re not there,” said David Thompson, managing partner of the Cooper and Kirk law firm in Washington. Thompson represented some plaintiffs in the Illinois case.

    • It isn’t just some of the corrupt courts that want to obliterate the 2nd Amendment – it is Obama and the Leftist radicals that need it to happen to carry out their agenda and that “flawed” US Constitution gets in their way! Taking away the guns of citizens isn’t going to happen – not in the US. US Citizens do know their rights on this matter. Thanks be to our Founding Fathers for their wisdom and vision over 200 years ago.

  4. Rosemary Woodhouse

    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    • Self-evident. Endowed by their CREATOR with certain UNALIENABLE rights. Deriving their JUST powers from the CONSENT of the governed.

      Whenever any Form of Government becomes DESTRUCTIVE of these ENDS …

  5. As totally expected…BHO was an unnecessary person at a PRAYER VIGIL – as if he didn’t know what those words Prayer Vigil meant. Did those grieving appreciate his politicizing their tragedy, their losses, and fears? He is a disgrace. I put myself into those people’s shoes, and resent him for being there. As if the people haven’t been through enough, did they have to be searched or was the area cordoned off so BHO could have the platform?

    Obama Calls for Gun Control during Prayer Vigil
    December 17, 2012

    Some people walked up to two miles in cold rain to attend the vigil. [Why? Was parking closer prohibited by the Secret Service – so Obama could attend and fake another tear? Speak with no emotion? Hold a face in his hands and say he will handle it?]

    The president said he expected political opposition to the course of action he envisions for improving the safety and well-being of children, an indication that he may attempt to move gun-control measures.

    • I had the same thoughts, Bridgette. If this had happened to my family, I’d resent the hell out of him showing up, hogging the cameras, hogging the ceremony, making a political photo-op for himself. But then again, this is CT and it’s a state full of Democrats. I read that people lined up to meet him. WHY? I don’t understand much of what’s going on. I didn’t understand parents allowing journalists to question their children the day of the shooting. I don’t understand people watching TV to learn how to talk to their children, as if they OUGHT TO talk to them. I would turn off the TV and avoid talking to them about this. Are they trying to traumatize the kids? I clearly remember being traumatized by those nuke drills when we were kids. I remember cowering in fear whenever a plane went over, in the sixties. Fearful it was the Cubans or the Russians, ready to drop one on us. I don’t understand people whose children died going on national TV. I never understand the families of murdered people being on the 5 o’clock news. I would guess that the people at the memorial DID have to be searched and that the site was cordoned off. The media is NOT going to tell us how inconvenienced these grieving people were made by this potus who has to be the center of everything. He hasn’t the common sense to know his place. He spoke for 20 minutes. Just imagine. 20 minutes of his drama.

      ““Are we prepared to say that such violence visited on our children year after year after year is somehow the price of our freedom?” he added in a veiled rebuttal to conservatives who argue unfettered gun rights are necessary to safeguard against government tyranny.”

      Zero sum game. False choice. We can have both. Freedom and safety for those children. Common sense solutions–armed security guards, trained teachers, locks on doors, better identification and isolation of the mentally ill–and gun rights that ARE necessary to safeguard against government tyranny, perpetrated by Barry himself. Who knows better than he? He knows what he’s doing and he’s doing his usual in-your-face, defiling of the service for those victims with his totalitarian politics.

      “But he said if steps can save even one child or parent or community from tragedy, it would be well worth it. “We can’t tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end. To end them we must change,” he said.”

      Hitler might have said he had to confiscate guns to save one child, and 6 million paid the ultimate price, didn’t they? We can’t “tolerate” Barry anymore, but seems we have no choice unless one elector grows some and questions his eligibility to even be potus.

      As usual, it’s his way or the highway. False choice. Gun control or you’re for children dying. This is what he brings to a memorial service for murdered children. He’s disgusting.

      • The states could lead on this:

        No Co-Sponsors for Bill to Repeal 1990 Gun-Free Zone Act

        … Outgoing Congressman and former Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul (R – TX), proposed to repeal the 1990 legislation in July of 2011, but his bill received no co-sponsors. It was referred to the Judiciary Committee and later sat in the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement where it languished.

        Although, Rep. Paul’s bill is not likely to be brought to the floor, Congressman Louie Gohmert (R –TX) argued on Fox News Sunday for allowing school faculty members to be trained and armed so they can defend their students and themselves if need be. …

        In the meantime, if the federal government refuses to budge on repealing gun free school zone measures, the states and localities within them could start to go their own way.

        A small Texas school district could be the first in the country to pass legislation allowing faculty members to carry firearms, Fox News reports.

        Trustees at the Harrold Independent School District approved a district policy change last October so employees can carry concealed firearms to deter and protect against school shootings, provided the gun-toting teachers follow certain requirements.

        Superintendent David Thweatt told Fox News the policy was initiated because of safety concerns.

        “We have had employees assaulted before by people in the last several years,” Thweatt said. “I think that safety is big concern. We are seeing a lot of anger in society.”

        In Michigan, the upper and lower chambers of the state legislature recently voted to allow gun owners with conceal carry permits and extra training to carry their weapons in a concealed manner in designated gun-free zones: schools, day care centers, sports arenas, bars, places of worship, hospitals, dorms and casinos. It should be noted that the state legislature voted on this bill the day before the Sandy Hook School Massacre. Michigan’s Republican Governor Rick Snyder has yet to sign the bill. “

  6. Rosemary Woodhouse

    He’s a bastard with a purpose.

    • Rosemary Woodhouse

      Of course, the Japanese photographer would no longer be scripted to read “hair satan”. Too un-p.c.

    • Rosemary Woodhouse

      Or perhaps he;s IS just a forerunner. Regardless, he emerged from **nowhere**. WhoTF is he, anyway? The bottom line is he was an complete unknown who was obviously groomed to wield great power. Where did he come from? Who trained him? Who supported him? Why are his records sealed? Why does he have no discernable paper trail unlike you and me? Why is he practically **worshiped** and HOW is it that his every wish of his is granted? (Hmmmmm …okay…now this does sound conspiratorial, but the questions are valid. Does anyone….anyone….have an answer? _ Sincerely, RW

  7. NRA protest was a bust. Only 200 showed up. That’s a shame.

    What’s interesting is that the “arm school guards” movement seems to be gaining steam, stealing the thunder of the gun control people.


    White House highlights ‘obstacles’ to taking action on guns

    As gun control advocates and even some gun rights supporters call for renewed focus on gun control, including a ban on assault weapons, following Friday’s shooting in Newtown, Conn., the White House tamped down suggestions Monday that it will act quickly on the issue.

    When asked at Monday’s press briefing about the gun lobby’s influence on potential action, White House spokesman Jay Carney responded, without specifically mentioning that lobby, “I think we all recognize that this is a complex problem and there are obstacles to taking action coming from a variety of places. What the president hopes is that everyone steps back and looks at the situation that has to be addressed and thinks broadly and thoughtfully about how we can move forward.”

    Carney suggested that the most Americans can immediately expect to see out of the White House will be an effort to engage the public “in the coming weeks.”

    He added that “no single piece of legislation, no single action will fully address the problem. So I don’t have a specific agenda to announce to you today. I would simply point you to what the president said last night about moving forward in the coming weeks.”

    But Carney later stretched that timeline when asked about a potential loss of momentum on the issue. “It’s hard to think about 20 6- and 7-year-olds and what happened to them on Friday, and imagine that in a few weeks or few months that pain would not still be incredibly intense,” he said.”

    Now this is very interesting. Is he afraid to “engage” on this before he’s inaugurated, lest somebody who’s previously been cowed lets the cat out of the proverbial bag? Meaning somebody who KNOWS the truth of his ineligibility might speak up? Oh, how I’d love to believe that.

    What’s up with this? Barry talking about mental health and other aspects of this problem? Also how he needs to include mental health professionals and law enforcement in the discussion. Curious!

    Never let it be said that Barry didn’t stimulate at least one part of the economy.

  9. Yes, we the people demand a gun control bill
    Monday, December 17, 2012 by afret68

    Yes, the American people demand that congress submit and approve together with senate approval and presidential signature the following:

    No elected politician nor appointed administrator, have any security protection involving a gun of any description.

    • Yup. What I said! I like it. No bodyguards for wealthy leftists, either. No concealed carry for Michael Moore. Let him learn karate. (More like Sumo wrestling, in his case.)

  10. Perspective … Knives should no longer be a staple in the kitchen or for meals. Use a spoon or bite it into pieces – cave man style. Ban them. In fact ban anything with a point…pencils, pens, nails, pins, screws, hangers, or even forks, etc.

    A Call To Ban Steak Knives [in the UK]
    December 17, 2012
    May 26, 2005 Snip

    A&E doctors are calling for a ban on long pointed kitchen knives to reduce deaths from stabbing. A team from West Middlesex University Hospital said violent crime is on the increase – and kitchen knives are used in as many as half of all stabbings. They argued many assaults are committed impulsively, prompted by alcohol and drugs, and a kitchen knife often makes an all too available weapon. The research is published in the British Medical Journal. The researchers said there was no reason for long pointed knives to be publicly available at all. They consulted 10 top chefs from around the UK, and found such knives have little practical value in the kitchen.
    The researchers say legislation to ban the sale of long pointed knives would be a key step in the fight against violent crime.

    • See. If nutcases and criminals don’t have guns, they’ll find something else to use. They’re resourceful. It’s what evil geniuses do. There’s no way you can out-ban them. Like Hannibal Lecter, if necessary, they’ll use their teeth.


    A long conversation begins at that comment and relates to this post, which I created in order to consolidate all the discussion about the shooting in Newtown and the subsequent calls for gun control. I’m too lazy to copy it all here and delete it from there, so I’m linking it here.


      EXCLUSIVE: Fear of being committed may have caused Connecticut gunman to snap
      … Adam Lanza, 20, targeted Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown after killing his mother early Friday because he believed she loved the school “more than she loved him,” said Joshua Flashman, 25, who grew up not far from where the shooting took place. Flashman, a U.S. Marine, is the son of a pastor at an area church where many of the victims’ families worship.

      “From what I’ve been told, Adam was aware of her petitioning the court for conservatorship and (her) plans to have him committed,” Flashman told “Adam was apparently very upset about this. He thought she just wanted to send him away. From what I understand, he was really, really angry. I think this could have been it, what set him off.”

      A senior law enforcement official involved in the investigation confirmed that Lanza’s anger at his mother over plans for “his future mental health treatment” is being looked at as a possible motive for the deadly shooting.” … Adam Lanza attended the Sandy Hook School as a boy, according to Flashman, who said Nancy Lanza had volunteered there for several years. Two law enforcement sources said they believed Nancy Lanza had been volunteering with kindergartners at the school. Most of Lanza’s victims were first graders sources believe Nancy Lanza may have worked with last year.

      Flashman said Nancy Lanza was also good friends with the school’s principal and psychologist—both of whom were killed in the shooting rampage.”

      Somebody is outright lying. They still report that there’s no connection between Nancy Lanza and the school and yet this MARINE says she volunteered there as an aide for years. So says her ex-sister-in-law, too.


    He is against armed US citizens. He is FOR arming the Muslim Brotherhood with THE most technologically advanced killing machines:

    “Thu, Dec 13, 2012
    DoD To Send F-16s To Egypt As Part Of Foreign Aid Package
    First Jets To Be Delivered In January

    Four F-16 fighter jets are to be delivered to Egypt next month as part of an overall foreign aid package worth approximately $1 billion, and the move is causing some concern given that the recently-elected Islamic government has not shown a lot of signs of stability.”


  13. Of course, the Chinese would like the US disarmed! All communist countries would like that to happen, and the Left would really like it here in the US too. Although their imaginary goals are for quite different reasons. It isn’t going to happen no matter how hard they try and no matter what executive orders Obama puts into place to assume his dictator role. Interesting that the Communist Chinese want to take part in this conversation. Remember Mao and Anita Dunn’s looking to him for answers? Do you recall the Christmas ornament with Mao’s face that decorated the WH tree – that was before the year of the dog, this year.

    China Demands US Citizens Be Disarmed

    December 19, 2012

    The official Chinese government news agency, Xinhua, has demanded the US immediately adopt stricter gun control measures to reduce the number of firearms the US populace is permitted to possess.
    In an apparent effort to restrict information to their populace, the Chinese government wrote of a number of US mass shootings but failed to mention they were either stopped by a citizen legally carrying a firearm or otherwise only occurred in the controversial gun-free zones that critics say make prime targets for madmen.
    The current Chinese government, the communist People’s Republic of China, was established in a revolution led by Mao Zedong, who killed an estimated 40-70 million people with starvation, executions, and re-education camps.

  14. Someone questioned about Ann Barnhart. She hasn’t posted since early December. I hope those that know her are looking into her whereabouts. She has been more than outspoken about this regime.

  15. Ann had written this and it is quite easy to understand how the Muslims are taken advantage of by their own. In order to abide by Sharia, they are duped into thinking they pay no interest on their loans. Someone is getting a really good deal and it isn’t the person making the payments.

    On Sharia Finance, Blankies and Axe Body Spray 1
    Ann Barnhardt – December 3, 2012 Snip

    So the entire premise of Sharia finance is that there is NO INTEREST. If you borrow money, it is at zero percent, because the paying of interest is “haram”, which means “forbidden”, according to Sharia law. Got it? Good. Now, let me walk you through the reality of Sharia finance, and I warn you, don’t drink while you’re reading this, because if you do, you stand a good chance of spewing your Dr. Pepper out your nose, and I won’t be responsible for that.

    Let’s say a person buys a $150,000 home on a 15 year mortgage at 5%. Purely for the sake of simplicity, let’s just say zero down. The amortization table shows that over those 15 years, or 180 months, at 5% interest, the monthly payment would be $1186.19 and that the total interest expense paid over the life of the mortgage would be $63,514.28. So, principal plus interest would be $213,514.28 for the $150,000 property.

    Now here is an “interest-free” Sharia loan scenario. And bear in mind that I am dead serious here. I’m not making this up. A musloid walks in to a “Sharia-compliant” lender and tells them that they want to buy a $150,000 property on a 15 year term. The Sharia-compliant lender then looks up what the going INTEREST RATE is. (Uh, Houston, we have a problem.)

    In our example, it is 5% on a 15 year mortgage. The musloid banker then calculates the amortization table on a 15 year loan on $150,000 at 5%. (Uh, Houston, we’ve had some sort of major malfunction here.)

    He sees that the total interest expense would be $63,514.28. So, the “Sharia-compliant” lender then offers to buy the property at $150,000 and immediately sell it to the customer for . . . $213,514.28. The customer then sets up a note to repay the $213,514.28 in 180 equal monthly payments of $1186.19 at “zero percent”, because $213,514.28 divided by 180 is $1186.19. Voila! Zero interest!

    That’s it. I’m not kidding. I’m not making this up. If I was going to make something up, I would make something up that wasn’t totally, completely, laughably stupid.
    On Sharia Finance, Blankies & Axe Body Spray 2
    Ann Barnhardt – December 3, AD 2012

    Um, soooooo, tell me Mister Musloid, what EXACTLY is the $63,514.28 markup? Uh, isn’t that . . . interest? How was that amount calculated? Uh, didn’t you ping the interest rate market and calculate an amortization table to come up with that number? Yes. Isn’t the borrower paying the lender for the use of his money over the 15 year term? Yes. Wouldn’t TRUE zero-interest lending mean that you paid a total of $150,000 for the property, and that your monthly payment would therefore be $150,000 divided by 180 months, or $833.33 per month? Yes.

    And if you did a 30 year loan at true zero interest, your monthly payment would be $150,000 divided by 360, or $416.66 per month? Yes. THAT would be zero interest.

    Sharia finance is “zero interest” about as much as I am a bottle of 1964 Chateau Latour.

  16. Look how fast Barry can “lead” when he wants to.

    Obama announces task force to prevent gun violence

    Spurred by a horrific elementary school shooting, President Barack Obama tasked his administration Wednesday with creating concrete proposals to reduce gun violence that has plagued the country.

    “This time, the words need to lead to action,” said Obama, who set a January deadline for the recommendations.

    The president, who exerted little political capital on gun control during his first term, also pressed Congress to reinstate an assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004. He also called for stricter background checks for people who seek to purchase weapons and limited high capacity clips.

    “The fact that this problem is complex can no longer be an excuse for doing nothing,” Obama said. “The fact that we can’t prevent every act of violence doesn’t mean we can’t steadily reduce the violence.”

    Obama’s announcement Wednesday underscores the urgency the White House sees in formulating a response to the shooting in Newtown, Conn. Twenty children and six adults were killed when a man carrying a military-style rifle stormed an elementary school.”

    BY JANUARY! So this task force has to work over the holidays. No wonder Barry put Biden in charge. Barry’s going to Hawaii. While he’s lounging in Hawaii, they will be working. Allegedly.

    The results are already written. Probably written in 2008 or before. Don’t kid yourself. This is a joke. It’s a “complex” problem so he gives them WEEKS to come up with solutions. Let’s take a guess what they’ll be!

    Notice that word “steadily”. That’s code for “incrementally”. We START with background checks. Like Hitler, we go on to gun control and registration. When that doesn’t work, and they’ll see to it that it doesn’t, then they will STEADILY come up with more and more policies until they end up with the FINAL SOLUTION: CONFISCATION OF ALL GUNS, for the children.

    • Gateway Pundit has articles reporting that Barry is FUND RAISING off the Newtown massacre and that he’s proposing RAISING TAXES in response to the massacre (because we ought to come together and agree that whatever Barry wants is right).

      Barry says he’s going to PUSH these “concrete ideas” that his task force comes up with as soon as January (when he’s back from vacation in Hawaii. It’s not THAT urgent, after all! He needs his rest.) This will be like Obamacare. They plan to RAM THIS THROUGH just as they RAMMED THROUGH Obamacare. He’s demonizing the NRA and saying “responsible” gun owners should go along with his plans. He will probably go off on another round of campaign-like trips as soon as he can. To demonize and propagandize. It’s disgusting. WHEN WILL SOMEONE WHO KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT HIS INELIGIBILITY FINALLY TELL THAT TRUTH BEFORE HE’S INAUGURATED AGAIN?

      Just heard McCaskill on radio. She says her father, an avid hunter, never “needed” the types of guns used in war. Well, if you’d read the Constitution, Claire, you’d realize that guns of war are EXACTLY the REASON FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT. A WELL REGULATED MILITIA (THAT’S WAR) BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE …

      I’ve explained before, but I’ll explain again: The term “well regulated” does NOT and did NOT mean controlled by anyone. It meant “regulated” in the sense that the militia needed weapons. Well supplied. Well regulated. The right of the people to KEEP and BEAR arms SHALL not be infringed. Why? Because the militia (which are the people) need to be well supplied with arms to SECURE their free state against ALL enemies, internal or external.

  17. 1:30 into this video. McCaskill says, “score this” to the NRA. How’s that senatorial reelection working out for all you idiotic gun-loving moderates in Missouri that voted for McCaskill, after FALLING FOR HER “I’m a rural, gun-loving, straight-shooting Missourian” act? Idiots. Fools. What’s worse? A woman who PRETENDED to care about the Second Amendment or a guy who was mistaken about how a woman’s body might operate under stress? Did I say, “IDIOTS”? Thank you for reelecting this turncoat charlatan.

  18. Leader of the task force:

  19. The Senate majority leader and the “finest shooting park” ever. He carried a gun everywhere!

  20. This story came and went and did not maintain much steam before CT tradgedy. . .happened December 2, 2012. A couple of things sort of stick out in the article. One is, he killed his Dad. Two his dad was a college professor. Three he supposedly had Asperger’s and blamed dad for it. Who filled him with that notion? Anything on the father? (This was posted the StarTribune, Wyoming’s news source, but is no longer there. I was able to get a cached copy. It was linked in a comment section of a Mark Levin article, I think. Why was it removed? Other places still have the story when do a google search but then they probably are not linked for people to go check out, either. NOw I just did another google while writing this and two more links are bye-bye, one being a Kansas Paper.) This telling of the event is interesting. Is this why it was thought Adam killed his father; crimes mixed up? Or connected?

    Conn. neighbor: Wyoming killer was upset with dad
    2012-12-02T15:57:50Z 2012-12-03T11:04:47Z Conn. neighbor: Wyoming killer was upset with dad
    The Associated Press The Associated Press

    December 02, 2012 3:57 pm
    A man who police say killed his father, a woman and himself in Wyoming on Friday told a neighbor in Connecticut weeks before the killings that he believed his father gave him Asperger’s syndrome and said his dad should be “castrated” to prevent him from having more children

    Neighbor Matt DiPinto of Vernon, Conn., told local reporters that Christopher Krumm made the comments while giving him a ride home a few weeks ago.

    “He’s like, `So my dad gave me Asperger’s … and my dad should have never had any kids. He should have never had me and passed it on to me, and the government shouldn’t have let him have kids,'” DiPinto told Fox affiliate WTIC-TV. “It was just out of nowhere … but he seemed pretty livid about it.”

    Police in Casper, Wyo., say Krumm shot an arrow into the head of his father, James Krumm, with a high-powered bow Friday while his father was teaching a computer science class at Casper College.

    James Krumm, 56, managed to wrestle with his 25-year-old son and gave time for about six students to flee, an act police called heroic. Authorities say both men died after Christopher Krumm stabbed himself and then his father. Before the classroom attack, police say Christopher Krumm fatally stabbed his father’s live-in girlfriend, Heidi Arnold, 42, at the home she shared with James Krumm about two miles from campus.

    The motive for the attack isn’t clear.

    Vernon police searched Christopher Krumm’s apartment on Friday night. Officers didn’t disclose what they found, but said any items of interest would be turned over to investigators in Wyoming.

    Neighbors say Christopher Krumm moved into the apartment building last summer and appeared to work in construction or for a utility, because he wore a neon safety vest, The Hartford Courant reported. They say he was quiet and appeared to be anti-social.

    The killings stunned people in the apartment building.

    “It’s so insane,” said Kim Warren, another of Christopher Krumm’s neighbors. “You never would have guessed he would have done something like that.”

    Mickie Goodro, of Twin Falls, Idaho, a friend of James Krumm and Arnold, told the Casper Star-Tribune that Christopher Krumm was in her Calculus class when she taught at Casper College. Krumm graduated from Natrona County High School in Casper in 2005 and studied electrical engineering at Colorado School of Mines, the newspaper reported.

    Christopher Krumm’s previous addresses include one in the western Massachusetts city of Springfield and others in the Colorado cities of Golden, Fort Collins and Lakewood.

  21. You know it’s a media meme and that the JournOlist is activated. This morning, after running a story about the funerals, my local station REPLAYED Barry’s comments about gun control from the other day. Now, that’s NOT news. Barry is calling on his minions to call Congress as many times as necessary to push gun control. Cuomo, believe it or not, is talking about CONFISCATION (or, a milder version–FORCED sell back to the government). Now this, after the NRA spoke out today:

    Journalists slam NRA throughout press conference

    At one point, LaPierre said “the media demonize lawful gun owners, amplify their cries for more laws and fill the national debate with misinformation and dishonest thinking.

    If the NRA doesn’t like reporters, the feeling is apparently mutual. [and they proceeded to PROVE LaPierre’s point!]

    As Jeffrey Goldberg, a national correspondent for The Atlantic, put it:

    Reporters on my Twitter feed seem to hate the NRA more than anything else, ever.

    — Jeffrey Goldberg (@JeffreyGoldberg) December 21, 2012

    Here are some of the views expressed by reporters and editors — from news outlets including Talking Points Memo, Politico, The New York Times and The Huffington Post – on Twitter during LaPierre’s speech:

    LaPierre as delusional as any dictator. His speech against music videos, hurricanes has the feel of a Castro rant or Mugabe tirade.

    — The Huffington Post’s Jason Cherkis (@jasoncherkis) December 21, 2012

    In Wayne LaPierre’s defense, tone-deafness is a serious condition that afflicts hundreds of thousands of Americans. [make that MILLIONS, jerk. 4.3 million. That’s how many are in the NRA. Over 8000 new members per day since CT.]

    — New York Daily News’ Josh Greenman (@joshgreenman) December 21, 2012

    Wayne LaPierre should have just given this speech to an empty chair on a stage

    — The Nation’s Jeremy Scahill (@jeremyscahill) December 21, 2012

    No two ways about: This is gross, awful, dishonest.

    — Talking Points Memo’s Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) December 21, 2012

    What is this NRA guy talking about? Blame hurricanes. Blame media. It’s so strange. [Ben probably blames guns and not the shooter AND blames hurricanes on global warming! “It’s so strange.”]

    — Politico’s Ben White (@morningmoneyben) December 21, 2012

    This is nuts.

    — Talking Points Memo’s Ryan J. Reilly (@ryanjreilly) December 21, 2012

    If it wasn’t for all the dead children, the #NRA press conference might have been amusing.

    — The New York Times’ Jonathan Weisman (@jonathanweisman) December 21, 2012

    Stallone movie meets Fidel Castro speech [Yeah, I expect Castro to be FOR gun rights for the people. They don’t even have decent CARS in Cuba!]

    — Politico’s Alex Burns (@aburnspolitico) December 21, 2012

    Many of the same reporters were infuriated that the NRA wouldn’t take questions. …”

    Oh, and they call themselves “journalists”. I imagine they BELIEVE that they’re objective. NOTICE how they pick up what people RIGHTFULLY say about Barry (Castro, dictator, tone-deaf, dishonest, Mugabe, etc.) and try to turn it back on anybody who disagrees with THEM! Thank goodness for Twitter because if nothing else, it EXPOSES THEM FOR THE BOGUS UNBIASED REPORTERS OF FACT THAT THEY PRETEND TO BE.

    • btw, tens of MILLIONS of LEGAL gun owners in the USA who don’t go on rampages against little children. At least 62 SCHOOL CHILDREN killed in Chicago THIS YEAR by illegal guns.

  22. Typical leftist response to violence: Deliberately put more people at risk. When the criminals (and the government) know where the guns are, they can go there to take them.

    Outrageous… Lib NY Paper Publishes Names & Addresses of Legal Gun Permit Holders

    On Sunday, liberal New York newspaper published the names and addresses of legal permit holders in two counties online and in print.”

    So I suppose any violence that ensues means this paper has blood on its hands, like the NRA is said to have. Not to mention: Now the criminals know who is UNARMED, and sitting ducks, just like the children in “gun free” zones. btw, Clinton proposed guns in schools long ago. I guess they forgot.


    You cannot make this stuff up. As Feinstein and Cuomo talk MANDATORY gun buybacks with confiscation possible, and the leftists uniformly ridicule the NRA for suggesting armed guards at schools, and the leftist parents whine that they don’t want schools to be “fortresses”, we learn that Barry’s kids’ school has … ARMED GUARDS!!! I say, when Barry’s guards are disarmed, when Feinstein gives up her own concealed carry permit, when the Sidwell Friends School becomes LESS of an armed “fortress”, then We the People will STILL CLING TO OUR GUNS AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT. 🙂

    School Obama’s Daughters Attend Has 11 Armed Guards

    … Obama sends his kids to a school where armed guards are used as a matter of fact.

    The school, Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, has 11 security officers and is seeking to hire a new police officer as we speak.

    If you dismiss this by saying, “Of course they have armed guards — they get Secret Service protection,” then you’ve missed the larger point.

    The larger point is that this is standard operating procedure for the school, period. And this is the reason people like NBC’s David Gregory send their kids to Sidwell, they know their kids will be protected from the carnage that befell kids at a school where armed guards weren’t used (and weren’t even allowed).

    Shame on President Obama for seeking more gun control and for trying to prevent the parents of other school children from doing what he has clearly done for his own. His children sit under the protection guns afford, while the children of regular Americans are sacrificed. …”

  24. Read here to see how prescient Jack Cashill can be:
    In Newtown Tragedy, Life Imitates Art
    In 1998 I started writing my first novel, 2006: The Chautauqua Rising, and the following year I shocked myself by finding a publisher. Set in Western New York State in the year 2006, the book tells the story of a largely non-violent Tea Party-like insurrection against the soft, creeping tyranny of an Al Gore presidency.

    An apolitical, small-town newspaper editor, TJ by name, finds himself unexpectedly at the center of the storm. His immediate problem is Josh Kennedy, an ambitious New York State attorney general whom I modeled on Eliot Spitzer. Kennedy and his advisers have been caught on tape, plotting evil. This fiction more closely tracks with the Gabby Giffords shooting, but the impulse to exploit a school shooting remains an irresistible temptation for our friends on the left.”

    More at the link, including chilling excerpts from Cashill’s book where the plot includes leftists who discuss staging a “Dunblane”-like shooting for political purposes. His characters discuss how damning it would be for the public to learn that these politicians were “reveling in the potential murder of small children.”

    That seems to have not happened. We’ve heard no universal condemnation of that guy who said it “helps” their anti-gun, anti-Second Amendment cause that these were “white children” who were killed. Obama and his krewe wasted NO TIME politicizing this event. Today, I read an column by Dana Milbank where he decried how Barry allowed himself to be distracted by questions about the fiscal cliff, when he was supposed to be talking about (and politicizing) the Sandy Hook massacre. Milbank worried that the momentum was getting lost. Is this the REAL reason Barry’s returning early from Hawaii? To push his gun control/confiscation plans or to help the economy?

  25. This morning Peter Boyles was talking about new (?) information that there were 4 handguns found in the Sandy Hook school after the shooting and no assault rifle; that the only assault rifle was in the trunk of the car and never went into the school…I didn’t hear a lot of it but there are a couple of videos he alluded to on his website (under his show). One of the

    dated Dec. 17.
    I haven’d been on here as much over the holidays, was this discussed before? Does anyone know more about this?

    • From this morning (date is wrong):

      “Peter Boyles Show”

      January, 03 2013 5am

      [audio src="" /]

      See page for links to 6, 7 and 8am shows.


        8 a.m. show at about 1:24 but it’s a strange audio. It jumps from one subject to another. For some reason, the page header says this is from January 3, 2013, which is tomorrow! At 18:04, he replays an audio where a spokesperson says only 4 HANDGUNS were taken into the school and the rifle was left in the car, according to “several officials”. After that, he plays audio of someone saying it was the “long rifle” that killed most people but he also has audio of a reporter saying a “long rifle” is found in the trunk and police were shown “clearing the” ammo from the gun.

        This story talks about how sheriffs across the country can and probably WILL resist the federal government trying to confiscate anyone’s guns. There’s precedence for sheriffs standing up to the feds and the feds have backed off.

        Sheriffs called out to fight the law
        Local officers predicted to be key to preventing gun confiscation

        A high-profile former sheriff who once sued the U.S. government over its gun regulations – and won – says it’s the local sheriff who will have to defend Americans when and if the feds start banning and confiscating guns.

        Richard Mack, a former sheriff in Graham County, Ariz., joined with then-Ravalli County Sheriff Jay Printz in a lawsuit against Washington when Bill Clinton demanded sheriffs enforce provisions of the Brady Bill gun-control law.

        He won. And since then he’s been at the front of a movement that highlights the responsibility of local sheriffs. … ”

    • SEO, we’ve talked a bunch of times about the changing story. How originally most of the reports were that he left the “rifle” in the car. I read yesterday, somewhere, that there was even video of the cops taking the rifle from the car. (It wasn’t linked and I didn’t have time to go looking for it.)

      I saw and spoke here on the blog about a video of a man who brought some of the kids into his home right after the incident. These children told him that the shooter had two “little guns” and that he used one of them to kill their teacher. Then suddenly the “official story” became that the “Bushmaster” was the gun used to kill everyone, except that Lanza killed himself with a handgun.

      Later on, I read a story that said it was a SHOTGUN left in the car, not a Bushmaster, which wasn’t called a Bushmaster until Obama started his campaign for gun control. It was variously referred to as a 223 or an AR-15. But clearly, early on, they reported that he left the “rifle” in the car. These were the articles written that very day. I was following them as they were published.

      A shotgun is not a rifle. I’ve since learned that a Bushmaster is nothing more than a cosmetically jacked up 22 rifle. I’m not a gun expert, so I can’t speak authoritatively about that. I do know what a 22 is and it’s not a high caliber weapon; it’s more like something people shoot rabbits with. The difference is that they added these features that made this particular gun look “meaner”, more like a military weapon and one that is carried like an machine gun or the like.

      I did see that video earlier, about the father who seemed to be laughing and joking. Some people said it was just nervous laughter. But it did strike me as odd. I was reminded of Bill Clinton at Ron Brown’s funeral, where he suddenly became sober and weepy when he noticed the cameras on him. However, people react differently to stress and extreme emotion. Some people compartmentalize. This father changed his demeanor when it came time for him to speak about what happened. Maybe before that, he’d buried it, which is why he was able to appear to be more light hearted; but when it came down to dredging up the memories and speaking about his little girl, he began to choke up again. I don’t understand, myself, how any of these people can go on TV after what happened to them. If I were in their shoes, I wouldn’t even answer the phone, much less talk to these reporters or, heaven forbid, appear on televised interviews. I don’t know what goes through their minds. It makes no sense to me, but people do it. A lot of people do, so maybe I’m the weird one.

      I did notice early on that the media chose that man’s little girl, the pretty blond girl, as their poster child. Yet her father made statements (not reported in the lamestream) where he specifically said that the fault lies with the shooter. With his own “free agency”, meaning his free will: He’s the guilty party and he will pay the price for his sins. That’s how I heard what he said.

  26. He also was talking about this video showing one of the fathers of the victims the day after . He is smiling and laughing until he gets to the microphone. It’s weird.

    • Eeww. I could only watch through the second family. The mother seemed like she was on Zoloft. The Dad was traumatized; don’t think he is internally going along with the mother on not seeing the body. The mother seems to be reading from a script. The first guy was surreal to watch. Even more so if you watch without sound. People do not act this way within two days of a death; maybe a week later, after all the tributes and eulogies offered up, one would have all these ‘resources of memory’ so ready to be perfectly verbalized. Grief does not typically allow one to eulogize so soon with memories of ‘was’ or ‘had’ , etc., No slip up to the child being in the present. People do not instantly accept death and it takes time and processing to speak of as dead, when close to the deceased.

      Oh, my God. What parent would not look at their child and if to look at the distorted child would keep one’s mind from seeing all her beauty? Who identified the bodies? Dental records are second and/or work with FIRST a next-of-kin identificaiton. Creepy. Surreal. And yes, I am passing judgement.

  27. Was is ever discovered what years Nancy Lanza worked at John Hancock or her position with John Hancock?

    The reason I ask is because when I was researching this family I found That a couple of CEO’s at John Hancock were fined by the courts (I believe it was the late 80’s) for wining and dining Representatives of Congress for special favors in writing law’s that would benefit John Hancock.

    I traced the information and it led me too yep….Ted Kennedy, who of course had a huge hand in Obamacare. It made me draw a huge humm. But I was never able too find what Nancy Lanza’s position was at John Hancock or the exact years that she worked there. Did Nancy know too much? was she ready too release something she may have known? like I said, the information just made me wonder…

    Soe, If you decide you might want too look into this I started with a search of – v John Hancock PDF

    The information should not be hard too find.


      “NEWTOWN, Conn. – Nancy J. (Champion) Lanza, 52, a former resident of Kingston, N.H. died Dec. 14, 2012, in Connecticut.

      Born in Salem, Mass., the daughter of Dorothy (Huse) (Champion) Hanson and the late Donald Champion, she was raised in Kingston, N.H., and graduated from Sanborn Regional High School with the class of 1978.

      She attended the University of New Hampshire and worked in the New Accounts Division of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company of Boston until 1992.

      A resident of Newtown since 1998, Nancy was involved as a volunteer in local charity work, especially the local women’s shelters. She had many lifelong friends locally and around the world, and enjoyed flower gardening, travel, the arts, and museums. An avid Red Sox fan who shared season’s tickets, she also enjoyed listening to jazz music.

      She is survived by a son, Ryan J. Lanza of Hoboken, N.J.; her mother, Dorothy (Huse) (Champion) Hanson of Barrington, N.H.; two brothers, James M. Champion of Kingston, N.H., and Donald R. Champion of Colorado; a sister and brother-in-law, Carol A. Gould of Maine; her former husband, Peter Lanza of Connecticut; her special nieces and nephews, and several aunts, uncles, cousins, and many friends.

      services: A private family service was held on Thursday, Dec. 20, and a public memorial service will be held next year. Memorials may be made to the charity of the donor’s choice.”

    • Thank you much Miri for the info. when I was looking into it her obit was yet not released.

      New Accounts Division? possibility, maybe something to do with health care new account’s? prefunding of corporate employer’s retiree healthcare liabilities maybe? hard too say…like I said the information I came across just made me pause..


    I don’t know what to think about that site and the theories there, but they have a lot of links. I found it while looking for the video to the audio that Boyle plays, where someone says “four handguns recovered inside the school.” This site says that was Pete Williams speaking; I assume of NBC? That site claims to have a link to the source, but I can’t find it there.



    In addition, Williams reports that on 12/11/12 Lanza went to a store to TRY to buy another rifle but he was denied because of a waiting period in CT. I found that video at the same site that later posted a retraction:

    In a head spinning contradiction:

    “Story Retraction: Authorities Say Newtown Shooter Did Not Use Assault Weapon

    Earlier today I posted an NBC News report about the type of weapons Adam Lanza used during his Sandy Hook rampage. That report was from December 15 and contained false information. According to the Newtown coroner, Lanza used a semi-automatic AR-15, not four handguns as the report said. The entire post has been retracted. I apologize for the error.”

    So her headline retracting the false information says that the shooter did NOT use an assault weapon and yet her retraction says that the coroner says that he did NOT use handguns. So what kind of gun did he use, IF ANY?

    • I find this disturbing on so many levels. I had never seen this before. This is allegedly of the two blond sisters of Emilie Parker, after the shooting. WHY are they there? Why the smiles? Why those outfits? Fitting? I realize the children don’t understand, but does this look like a birthday party instead of a very, very sad occasion?


      The entire family:


      I’m going by another website for the information that the photo taken with Obama is after the tragedy. But if so, tell me this–did they dress one of the sisters in Emilie’s black and red dress for the photo op with the potus? If not after the tragedy, then upon what occasion did the Parker girls meet this man?

      • Ron Polland:


        Published on Jan 1, 2013

        At YouTube:

        • Gordo, I replaced the quote with a link to the video at You Tube, where people can read Dr. P’s intro. One of the commenters points out that in the family photo, one of the little girls on his lap has no legs. That does seem odd. This whole situation makes me queasy. There’s seemly and unseemly. That photo op seems disturbingly unseemly to me. As does the inappropriate laughter. I won’t even “go there” and comment on the red and black color scheme.

        • Ron Polland:


          Published on Jan 7, 2013

          “Jennifer Rekos’ Parents? Mother like an Actress and Father like a Reporter”

          At YouTube:

          “Another suspicious “grieving video” interview. In real life, parents are inconsolable. Here the Mother has those typical, repetititive inhales actresses do followed by forced dry cries. All robotic and predictable. Father sounds and acts like neighbor or news reporter. Emotionless.

          At the end of the clip, there was an edit, followed by a suddenly calm mother.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s