Obama will be “Exposed” as Ineligible Soon!

©Bridgette@WTPOTUS 2012

Wishin’ and hopin’ and thinkin’ and prayin’!

That his jail term will start….

Obama As Prisoner

4

On November 30th, Carl Gallups, 1330 WEBY AM, Gulf Coast Talk Radio reported on his show “Freedom Friday” the following two important news stories about Obama’s ineligibility.  A You Tube of that program was posted on WTPOTUS by Itooktheredpill.  From that video, there were two news stories.  One was reported by World Net Daily in the article,  “Eligibility Challenge Returns to Haunt Florida”.

Previously in the case, Michael C. Voeltz vs Defendants Barack H. Obama et al,  Florida Circuit Judge Terry Lewis,  said that according to Florida’s election law Obama’s constitutional eligibility could not be challenged because he hadn’t yet been nominated to the position.  WND reported, ” Florida law provides that anyone qualified to vote in an election may challenge a candidate based on ‘ineligibility of the successful candidate for the nomination or office in dispute.”    Michael Voeltz is a registered democrat, and he and his attorney, Larry Klayman were told that Voeltz has standing to bring the case.   Since Obama was elected president, this case can now proceed.  They are asking that results of the presidential election in Florida be quashed.

Secondly,   Mr. Gallups stated that the PPSimmons Channel has “insider information” and reported the following.   It was transcribed from the video beginning at 1:27.

BREAKING! Two Huge Announcements on Barack Hussein Obama’s Eligibility!

“A surprising and potentially devastating ELIGIBILITY EVENT is scheduled to happen before the January 6th Electoral College certification, perhaps by the middle of December. This event most likely will be aired on national cable television and around the world exposing Obama’s ineligibility. The person doing the exposing is a very important person with constitutional standing to do the exposing of the evidence against Obama.”

#######

4

Anyone who ran for president has constitutional standing and can present the information. We know it won’t be a demoncRat who abides by the Constitution.  Who is the person that has the guts to expose Obama and handle the ridicule from the radical Left that is sure to come?

All of these people ran as Republican presidential candidates. Will it be Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul, Buddy Roemer, Rick Perry, Jon Huntsman, Michelle Bachmann, Gary Johnson, Herman Cain, Thaddeus McCotter, or Tim Pawlenty?  Or someone else?

My thoughts.    This unknown person has all of the evidence in his possession, and is willing to go out on a limb and face the American public with evidence that can potentially stop the Marxist Communist train in its tracks.    We know Donald Trump was willing to expose Obama just so far.  The media refused to vet Obama even having the evidence of a birth certificate forgery put before them, and they did little to broadcast Sheriff Joe’s evidence from their months long investigation.   Ken Bennett,  AZ Secretary of State, stuck his head in the sand when he had the chance to stop Obama from being on their State ballot when Hawaii refused to certify his birth certificate.    If Donald Trump is involved, will he play the final Trump card?  To whom might he pass that card?

Is this to much to hope for?  Will we be devastated and defeated again?  Or will this challenge and evidence finally bring down the man who usurped the office of the president?    Will justice finally be served?

  Who Will Be a Patriot and a Hero?

Who Will Stand Up for America?

4

Photo Source

4
4
4
Advertisements

58 responses to “Obama will be “Exposed” as Ineligible Soon!

  1. Since the only names that ran against Obama is Romney and Johnson it would seem they would be the only two that would have any standing. Maybe the others could argue the Republican primaries would have had a different outcome, potentially, if the People knew Obama was not running, but I think that is still a very thin argument to give them standing. If it is Johnson, no one — not even Republican, sadly will stand behind him, which would make it easier for it to be accepted as proper procedure (even though not) to toss the thing right out. If Romney, it will go through because he would have a lot of people and intelligence from around the world to help him with proof and backing as the citizens of FL, in masses, voted for Romney and West and both were blatantly fraudulent races. I have gotten so used to these hyperbole announcement that I just nod my head and say, “Whatever”. Just a teaser, most likely, and a big, disappointing non-announcement.

    • I used all of the names that were running for president, not just the ones on the ballot. From all of the court cases, I was never sure who had standing. It seemed to be the typical excuse by judges to use standing against everyone who filed a case. Mitt would have nothing to lose by bring forth the information. In fact, the Republican party should have done it a long time ago. They had all the information that people kept telling them, yet they did nothing and believed what the lawyers from the Congressional Record wrote in their misleading memos. We will see if it happens and isn’t a teaser as you suggest. I hope not. We need to end this regime’s power. We still have another chance and need one Rep and one Senator to challenge the electoral vote. Another option is to start impeachment proceedings over a number of different things, like Benghazi or the non war in Libya where he didn’t confer with Congress first, or for not obeying and standing for the laws of the US like DOMA.

  2. Rosemary Woodhouse

    I don’t know guys. I just don’t see Romney rocking the boat. Wish it would be so but, again, am not holding my breath.

    • He got SO quiet after the election; so very quiet. And that visit to the WH, what was that all about?

      • Obama wanted him to eat crow, but instead the chef made him chili. It was so Obama could “look” like a decent winner. Does anyone think that Marxist Obama would listen to a Republican’s suggestions on how to solve problems, or give a rat’s patoot about what Romney did to become a success? It was a meeting between class and no class and a successful man vs one who never won anything fairly in his life. No contest. Obama hasn’t solved anything yet because that isn’t what their goal is. It is the opposite.

        Perhaps Mitt hasn’t been that quiet, but instead the media wasn’t reporting. The leftist historians are probably already rewriting history that Obama didn’t run against anyone in 2012.

        • Obama wanted him to eat crow, but instead the chef made him chili. 🙂 That’s funny!

          Actually, how do we know it WAS turkey? Are there some crows missing from the WH lawn?

        • Rosemary Woodhouse

          I believe he’s still in shock as he had every justifiable expectation of winning.

    • I don’t either but maybe his meeting with Obama gave him indigestion. If the turkey chili didn’t.

  3. “If Donald Trump is involved, will he play the final Trump card?”

    Good question.

  4. Repeating what I wrote in a comment on the prior post…

    I think we need either:

    1) One Electoral College Presidental Elector, or

    2) The combination of one U.S. Senator and one U.S. Representative, who together could object to the Congressional certification of the Electoral College election results. And before any Democrat claims that that would be “unprecedented”, remind them that not only is it precedented but also Democrats did it to President George W. Bush during his re-election 8 years ago!

    Senator Barbara Boxer, D-California, and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-Ohio, objected to the certification of Ohio’s electoral votes during a joint session of Congress on Thursday, January 6, 2005. It was the second time since 1877 that the House and Senate were forced into separate meetings to consider electoral votes.

    http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Boxer-delays-presidential-vote-count-with-protest-2740511.php

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,143510,00.html

    ===========

    Do we have one good Senator out of 100, and one good Representative out of 435?

    It’s sad for me to say, “I don’t know if we do.”

    But if we do, here’s the relevant legal code:

    3 USC § 15 – Counting electoral votes in Congress

    And by the way, in January 2009, Dick Cheney Broke the Law by not calling for objections.

    • Oh thanks, I didn’t know that one Elector could object and make a difference.

      Yes, consider us all Marines who are ” looking for a few good men!” Are there any? Alan West is still there! Can he be persuaded? Do it Col. West! He outed all the commies and socialists in the Black Caucus and then lost due to a fraudulent vote in his district – revenge could be so sweet. It would be the sign of a winner in my opinion. He says what he means and means what he says. It was refreshing to listen to a patriotic American. (It should be understood that women are included in the saying of a few good men.)

      I still think that Cheney lost his train of thought or his place in the agenda because right at the moment he was to ask for objections, Nancy Pelosi jumped out of her chair and the democrats started cheering. I don’t remember over what, but I believe it was an intentional distraction.

      These are the key dates pertaining to the U.S. Electoral College.
      http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/key-dates.html

      • Alan West is not an option, because the new Congress will be sworn in a few days before the Electoral College vote is certified.

      • I still think that Cheney lost his train of thought or his place in the agenda because right at the moment he was to ask for objections, Nancy Pelosi jumped out of her chair and the democrats started cheering. I don’t remember over what, but I believe it was an intentional distraction.

        Either go to the 26:48 mark of the video below, or click on this link to go directly to that spot in the video.

        • You are most likely right Pill. So they were cheering and Nancy jumped up after the final vote tallies were read for BHO, then McCain, and after that Biden and Palin. Is that when VP Cheney was supposed to ask for objections or was it before that? We knew he hadn’t done it for sure. I know what I believed at the time, but it does look different now if that is where objections are to be asked. I remember it being a hot topic at the time, and Air Force’s recollections are mine also. Didn’t many also think that she jumped up and got everyone clapping to cover the guy who wanted to object?

          We didn’t start this blog until August, 2009, so the discussion would be on the other blog to which we don’t have access.

          • I heard someone say something right before they all started clapping, but I couldn’t tell what was said. It wasn’t Cheney. It was someone behind him.

    • Anyone else remember a very brief video clip from very early 2009 (not sure if it still exists or has been scrubbed), showing what appeared to be a Representative objecting? I vaguely remember that it looked to be some guy in a red or maroon-colored jacket and a beard, who raised his hand and tried to speak, but there was so much noise, shouting and Democrap “celebration” going on at the time that he couldn’t be heard, and so went unnoticed. I think the guy might have been from Texas, but I’m not 100% sure.

      • I thought this occurred at the time Nancy leap out of her chair and all of the clapping began. I do remember that that they were panning the audience. Also I think we discussed whether the objections part was left out of the information that Cheney was reading, if he was distracted, or if it was an intentional disregard of the proper procedures.

        • Air Force Brat!

          Thanks for the info — that does explain why the guy’s voice couldn’t be heard and his raised hand wasn’t noticed. I’m not sure about Cheney deliberately leaving out the part about objections — anything is possible, of course, but he has always come across (in spite of all his faults) as someone who wouldn’t deliberately do anything to hurt his country. I kind of lean toward all the hub-bub and Nancy doing her jack-in-the-box imitation being deliberate on the part of the Democraps, though.

          What I wouldn’t give to be able to find the video of the guy raising his hand and trying to make his objections known, though. Maybe someone with better search skills than I have can find it — assuming it hasn’t been scrubbed.

      • We aren’t crazy. I just found this and it says what we remember. I did see the man with the beard in the maroon shirt sitting in the audience. Unfortunately, there were two videos cited, one is gone, and the only other one left was uploaded by Nancy Pelosi. Nancy’s seems to be missing the parts that are talked about in the comments. I don’t know if the one video by Nancy is the same one Pill shows, but the information at the 20 minute mark is not there. (I checked and it appears to be the same video that Pill posted uploaded by Nancy.)

        Why Didn’t Dick Cheney Ask If There Were Any Objections To Barack Obama? Was There An Objection Silenced?

        January 8, 2009, the President of the US Senate, Dick Cheney and the US Congress failed to abide by the US Code of Federal Regulations by
        not calling for objections.

        You will see this failure on this video below, at the 20 minute point. Stay watching the video and you will see that as Dick Cheney is reading, some commotion happens on the floor of Congress, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of The House, jumps up and starts clapping hysterically and then you will hear rambunctious applause by Congress, for no apparent reason.

        As the camera pans the Congress members you will see that some are not clapping and there is one man with his arm up in the air. Click here to see the video: [Electoral College Vote Count Uploaded by NancyPelosi on Jan 8, 2009] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGt8hQZzg4&feature=related or go to this URL: [Gone]

        It may appear that an objection was raised and that whoever was attempting to make that objection was shouted down by the mob.

        By the inaction of the President of the Senate to call for objections, the certification of the Electoral votes was illegally obtained. This is another reason that makes Obama ineligible to be President, as well as neutering the US Congress.

        By Congress illegally certifying an ineligible person for President they have violated their oath to defend the American Constitution. They have proven that the highest oath they can promise to, means nothing to them. Their word, their promises, their oaths, their agreements and the existence of their lives are totally worthless to an honest society.

        Cont.
        http://aolanswers.com/questions/dick_cheney_ask_objections_barack_3507161917203

        • Air Force Brat!

          Found out the guy’s name — Steven LaTourette. Here’s a link to a little bit shorter version of the video, off Free Republic. At 4:07, in the lower left-hand corner, there he is, big as life, with his right hand raised. He’s most definitely NOT clapping, nor does he appear to be a happy camper.

          He probably couldn’t have made himself heard even if he screamed at the top of his lungs and jumped up and down. And what of the “mob mentality” vibe in the vid? Just creepy. They may have torn the poor guy apart if he’d been able to get Dick Cheney’s attention.

    • Rosemary Woodhouse

      Until January, we still have Allen West. And that man has plans…..

  5. SO~”WHO ‘Ya Gonn’a call, GOHST-BUSTERS!!??”

  6. Steve C LaTourette … Retired the end of his term 7/30/2012 … ??

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_LaTourette

  7. Occidental College Records…. Report 2 ORLY!!!!

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=364003#comments

    • December 3, 2012
      Very interesting. I am trying to recollect, but didn’t Montgomery Sibley run for president so he would get constitutional standing? The subpoenas are at the request of him and can be produced at Orly’s office. Can’t read the date when this was sent. Looks like Occidental has a U.S. Asst. Attorney General in Washington, D.C. representing them. Who is paying for the attorney? Might he be the VIP?
      Snips
      *****
      Subpoena in a Civil Case
      D.C. Superior Court Case # 2012-CA-008644 B
      Plaintiff : Montgomery Blair Sibley
      Defendant: Yvette Alexander, et al.
      To Record Custodian, Occidental College

      You are commanded to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents or objects at the place, date, and time specified below. See attached addendum.
      ****
      Subpoena Addendum

      You are commanded to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents or objects at the place, date and time specified below.

      Documents or Objects:

      1. All records related to Barack Hussein Obama, II also known as Barack Hussein Obama including without limitation, application for admission and transcripts;

      2. All records related to Barry Soetoro, including, without limitation, application for admission and transcripts.

      Place of Production Law Offices of Orly Taitz, Esq, 29839 Santa Margarita, Suite 100, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

      Date/Time: Dec. 14, 2012 at 11:00 am.

      In lieu of a personal appearance, the requirements of this subpoena may be met by delivery of the material by mail or overnight delivery service to:
      Sibley’s address in D.C.

      Contact Information for Plaintiff
      Montgomery Blair Sibley,….Washington, D.C.

      Counsel for Defendants:
      Andrew J. Saindon
      Assistant Attorney General, Equity Section

      441 Fourth Street, N.W. – 6th Floor South
      Washington, D.C.

    • I am thinking this is the VIP. He’s subpoenaed BHO’s Occidental records due on the 14th and that is middle of the month, and he has constitutional standing. I don’t know if he is considered a VIP but to some he might be.

      On November 29, 2012 -Sibley File a Motion to Hold Obama in Contempt-of-Court for not producing his BC that he has shown to the public as his sole documentary evidence of his qualifications for office.
      http://amoprobos.blogspot.com/2012/11/sibley-files-motion-to-hold-obama-in.html

      He filed a third lawsuit on Nov. 30 Challenging Obama’s Eligibility
      http://amoprobos.blogspot.com/2012/11/i-file-third-lawsuit-challenging-obamas.html

      • I’m thinking that he considers himself to be a VIP. I’m sorry, just my impression. Whatever works, though. By any means necessary. We need to adopt that slogan, too. If only the RINOs in Congress would. They need to realize what they’re up against and fight fire with fire.

        imho, what the House needs to do, what Boehner needs to do, is just pass the damned bill they want and send it to the demoncRAT Senate and the potus. They have no business in the first place “negotiating” with Barry, MUCH LESS WITH GEITHNER. Who the hell is Geithner? ELECTED BY NOBODY. The JOB of the House of Representatives is to create legislation. The only job of the potus with regard to LEGISLATION is to sign it or veto it. The job of the Senate is to pass the legislation or to parlay with the House to decide on compromise legislation that both houses can pass. NOWHERE IN THE EQUATION IS THE PRESIDENT, who does NOT write law. His only job is to sign it or veto it. PERIOD. Why do they give him power he doesn’t have? He is NOBODY with regard to writing legislation or allocating money (or raising or not raising the debt limit). PASS THE BILLS, SEND THEM TO THE DEMOCRATS, PUBLICIZE IT, AND LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY. LET THE SENATE REJECT IT. LET OBAMA VETO IT. PUT THE BALL BACK IN THEIR COURT.

  8. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Yet again: while I admire Orly’s zeal, she is NOT the attorney to lead the charge. We need big g u n s, not someone who received their JD online. Again, I do not besmirch her efforts, but this requires top notch counsel. She only serves to bolster the “laughing stock” factor and diminishes the “birfer” issue insofar as being taken seriously is concerned.

    • Rosemary, in this case, she is just the receiver of the information for Sibley. But she was turned down by Occidental in her recent case.

      • In this case, it is where he said that evidence isn’t printed from the internet.

        Orly Taitz Loses Obama College Records Suit In California Court
        The Huffington Post | By Mollie Reilly
        Posted: 12/02/2012

        Orange County Superior Court Judge Charles Margines rejected Taitz’ argument, citing procedural errors and questioning the quality of her evidence. “You should know that evidence is not stuff printed from the Internet,” Margines told Taitz, according to the Occidental Weekly.

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/02/orly-taitz-obama-college-records_n_2229370.html

        Also information posted here:
        Bridgette | December 1, 2012 at 12:27 pm

        https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/forgery-and-stealing-by-deception-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-99519

        • Is Occidental College Ready to Produce Records?
          December 1, 2012

          Botterud (legal counsel for Occidental college) said in an interview with The Occidental Weekly. Botterud did say that the college would comply with any legitimate court order to release any student’s information, including President Obama’s. ”

          This is the first time in four years that a college is issuing a statement that they will produce Obama’s records if a judge signs a motion to compel.

          http://beforeitsnews.com/obama-birthplace-controversy/2012/12/is-occidental-college-ready-to-produce-records-2450398.html

          • Killjoy, here. Of course they are ready. Really ready. All doctoring and creating complete. Of course they are ready. Of course they now speak out. Of course.

          • I agree with Hoot, sure they’re ready,….and probably better at forgery than the past schmucks! Sounds like just another tantalizer ,like all the lawsuits for the past how many years now? I won’t hold my breath….

          • Maybe they just finished creating them, changing them, or receiving them from the same source that created the SFCOLB, the LFCOLB, and the Selective Service record.

          • How can it be possible that they have NO transcript and NO recording of a hearing? Isn’t this required? I remember reading that she was ordered to pay Occidental’s court costs. Because there’s nothing about that in the order and because there conveniently is no proof that it was originally mentioned in the hearing, was this omitted in order to keep her from having grounds for appeal? How I wish I were a lawyer!

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        Yes, I read that here, Bridgette. I don’t care to “knock” anyone, but I guess we’re all at the point where self censorship is a “why bother” option….well, at least it is for me. Sometimes, the truth must be writ large. Orly, while certainly tenacious and passionate, diminishes the severity of the charge. Gravitas is what’s required.

    • Agree. IF someone big is gonna do something in FL, right on cue, Orly moves in ahead and upstages and prepares for the next one to be ho-hum-move-along-already-laughed-at-this. She is to be admired but needs to step down and let new faces take over.

    • I know. I feel trepidation. We’ve seen her subpoenas before. If this is the person who’s supposed to reveal something about his ineligibility in mid-December, then I’m disappointed. Why? Because I have no faith that this subpoena will work; they haven’t worked yet. Second, because they can still just say (haven’t they said already?) that there are no records anymore. Third, they’ve already gotten away with forged, lost, modified, rigged “documents” (by they I mean the entire obot universe), so can we ever have any faith in anything put out there? They might even be able to get away with presenting false data to a court of law because the only way to disprove their authenticity is to produce proof that they’re not authentic. How do you do that, without evidence of the creation of a forgery or destruction or modification of the original? It’s like with the birth records. They constantly tell us that the burden is on us to PROVE that he wasn’t born in Hawaii. You can’t prove a negative, especially if contradictory evidence has been destroyed, hidden, purchased, eaten by bugs, or burned.

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        They have had at least five years to do all of the scrubbing and obtain a fail proof forgery. We were discussing this in ’07!

        Please, Orly…go away and let the pros handle this! The egoists must disappear in favor of those who can get the job done. Crikey!

        • I always have to keep in mind those who accuse her of being an obot. She does SEEM to show up at critical times and interject herself into the situation at those times. On the other hand, maybe something will break and maybe she is just doing the best she can. She has passion, that’s for sure.

  9. A milestone! First Elector files a motion with Judge Wingate in US district Court in MS for a leave of court to join a legal action by Orly Taitz and others against Obama, Dem. Party, Pelosi, Onaka, Fuddy and others. Elector has a perfect standing according to admission by defendants themselves.

    Monday, December 3, 2012 16:42

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363998

  10. GO GO ORLY….she’s MY GIRL!!! (& LC)…. IT ONLY TAKES ONCE!

  11. Orly is an OBOT, get a clue.
    Filed in Fla :

    1. As a Florida elector, claimant has taken an oath to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” (Art. 6 s. 3 Florida Constitution).
    2. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the United States (Art. 6, c.2). Article 2 Section 1 Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution is a self executing constitutional provision, that uses the words “no person but a natural born Citizen shall be eligible” (sic), leaving no discretion in the eligibility requirement. As a self executing constitutional provision, no law or statute is necessary to enforce it.
    3. Plaintiff asserts that Barack Hussein Obama is not a natural born Citizen of the United States because he was born a British subject of a British subject father, Barack Obama Sr., whom was married to the mother of Barack H. Obama at the time Barack H. Obama was born.
    4. Barack Obama Sr., a citizen of the British colony of Kenya, and his children, were subject to the operation of the British Nationality Act of 1948. By the operation of Part 1 Section 1 of that Act, Barack Hussein Obama became a British subject, upon birth to a British subject father. It is not known whether he has lost that birth allegiance to the British crown.
    5. The natural born Citizen clause pertaining to Presidential eligibility is a national security requirement designed to prevent foreign influence in the highest levels of government
    6. The purpose of the natural born Citizen clause, prevention of foreign influence, is affirmed by Federalist 68, March, 1788, by Alexander Hamilton. Barack Obama Sr. is “an improper ascendant” (an improper ancestor), and Barack Hussein Obama is not “a creature of their own” (a natural born Citizen).
    7. Therefore Barack Hussein Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States, and its Constitution, which plaintiff must protect and defend by oath.
    8. The inclusion of the natural born Citizen clause in the U.S. Constitution implicitly adopts the concepts of natural law and law of nations (Morissette v. United States, 342 U.S. 246, 263 (1952). See also Miles v. Apex Marine Corp., 498 U.S. 19, 32 (1990), that adoption of a term of art adopts the entire body of law from which it is contained). Law of nations is explicitly adopted in Art. 1 cl. 10 s. 8.
    9. The British common law doctrine of “perpetual allegiance” ended on July 4, 1776, when the
    10. United States adopted law of nations and the “right of Election.” At that point in time U.S. residents became citizens of the United States, rather than British subjects (see Inglis v. Trustees of Sailors Snug Harbor, 28 U.S. 99, 122-126, (1830)). Any construction of natural born Citizen to mean the same as “natural born subject” is inconsistent with the US Constitution and Florida Statute 2.01.
    11. Law of Nations defines the term of art “natural born Citizen” as one born in the country parents who are that country’s citizens (see Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations, Section 212 (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758).
    12. The U.S Supreme Court’s definition of the term of art natural born Citizen mirrors Vattel’s “The Law of Nations” in The Venus, 12 US 253, 289 (1814), Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 679, 680 (1898), and with precedence in Minor v. Happersett, 88 US 162, 167, 168. Thus the definition stated therein is the law of the United States.
    13. Plaintiff Michael C. Voeltz, has standing, as a Florida voter, and taxpayer, to challenge the “nomination or election of any person to office” based on the winning candidates’ eligibility for the office sought (Fl. ss. 102.168(1)(3)(b)). The state of Florida has chosen, by popular election, the electors for Barack Hussein Obama to be President of the United States. Plaintiff has fulfilled all aspects of the Florida election statutes for this challenge of eligibility, as to timing, venue, and indispensible parties.
    14. The Florida Supreme Court has held that eligibility for office is a judicial determination, upon any challenge properly made. Shevin v. Stone, 279 So. 2d 17, 22 (Fla. 1972).
    15. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to Florida Statutes 86.011-86.111, and such other relief that is just and proper, to find that Barack Hussein Obama is not a Article 2 natural born Citizen eligible to serve as President of the United States.
    16. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority; Art. 3 s.2
    17. Presidential Electors are not members of the government (See McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 35(1892); Fitzgerald v. Green, 134 U.S. 377, 378 (1890); Ray v. Blair 343 U.S. 214, 224, 225 (1952)), thus the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility can not be a political question, but is a judicial one., until after an objection is made, and the joint congress separates to address it. (US Code 3 s 15)
    18. The Electoral Count Act (1877), section 2 (current version at 3 U.S.C. s.5, (2000)), specifies that election contests be settled by state legislated judicial tribunals of the highest degree by six days prior to the electoral voting day (second Monday in January) in order to be accepted by the joint Congress for section 2 status.
    19. The Florida Election Canvassing Commission performed a ministerial duty of certifying the 2012 general election, which is subject to judicial review upon any challenge properly made.
    CAUSE OF ACTION
    20. (Contest of Election – Florida Election Code section 102.168(1) et seq.)
    21. Plaintiff re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 23 as if fully stated herein.
    22. Barack Hussein Obama was a nominee for the Florida General Election of 2012, and has been elected as the President of the United States by the state of Florida.
    23. Barack Hussein Obama is not eligible to serve as President of the United States based on the requirements set forth by the U.S. Constitution of being a natural born citizen of the United States. Barack Hussein Obama has also defrauded the state of Florida (and by definition the rest of the 49 states) that he is eligible to be president, and he must be disqualified by this court and the election results nullified.
    24. Plaintiff therefore challenges the 2012 Florida General election.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF
    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court:

    I. Ask the ECC to de-certify the Florida General Election upon a judicial determination of the ineligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President of the United States. (Fl. ss. 86.051), and to certify the electors for Mitt Romney as the winner of the Florida general election.
    II. Plaintiff seeks an expedited ruling on this matter due to the time constraint of the approaching Electoral voting day,. (Fl. ss. 86.111; U.S.C. 3 s.5 s.6)

  12. Since Barry “won”, the electors have a very clear idea of the petulant, narcississtic baby boy.The Electoral College is now the only thing standing.between a Constitution Republic and a dictatorship.
    the evidence is clear from his arrogant behavior.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s