Forgery and Stealing by Deception (Open Thread)

© Miri WTPOTUS November 30, 2012

Obama's "New" CERTIFICATE of Live Birth

Obama’s “New” CERTIFICATE of Live Birth

Here’s an interesting story about a graduate student, Victoria Marut, who told her teachers and fellow students that she had terminal cancer.  They all sympathized and supported her; they donated gifts and planned a fundraiser on her behalf. 

When she started skipping classes and field work assignments, things got dicey:

Truman professor Peter Kelly required Marut to get a note from her doctor to see whether she was physically able to complete her work. When a legitimate-looking note arrived a short time later … Reger [principal of the primary school where Marut worked] still didn’t buy it.

Reger thought Kelly should check with the doctor to verify the information …

Marut had never been a patient … [the doctor] could “unequivocally confirm that this letter is a forgery,” according to police.

The Adair County prosecutor charged Marut with felony forgery on Nov. 14.  … Marut could be charged with stealing by deception for accepting gifts.

Johnson said that when he questioned Marut about the letter, she admitted to making it on her computer. …

Regular readers will quickly figure out why this story is interesting to us.  Here we have an ordinary person who fibbed about her medical condition. When called on it, she forged a doctor’s note, something that’s probably done very often by students all over the country.  Seems there was even an episode of “Leave It to Beaver” focused on the subject of forging notes to teachers.

Something tells me that Wally wasn’t charged with felony forgery, as was Marut.  In addition, Ms. Marut may very well face charges for “stealing by deception.”  She presented her teachers and her employer with a doctor’s note that she forged on her computer.  Now she might go to jail for felony forgery and stealing by deception.

Is there a double standard in this country?  You be the judge.

127 responses to “Forgery and Stealing by Deception (Open Thread)

  1. New Open Thread.

  2. Deceiver. How’s that hope and change working out for you kiddoes?

    “Sorry, college students. President Obama has cut your access to Pell Grants by 33%; he just forgot to mention it before Election Day.

    During the recent campaign, President Obama claimed credit for increasing funding to the Pell Grant program, which provides college funds, free from repayment, to millions of students. However, an email sent out Tuesday to some Dallas college students is revealing a detail the President forgot to mention: the time a student can receive a Pell Grant has been cut, by as much as three years. With Pell Grants for the fall semester now dispersed, colleges are informing students of their options, bringing the cuts to light.”

    DECEPTION. And forgery, too.

  3. h/t Gordo from the other open thread:
    Sibley’s motion to hold Barry in contempt for not producing his birth certificates under subpoena. This involved challenging electors.

    • When you have another criminal as the US Attorney General, BHO can get away with anything. He hasn’t produced anything to show his legitimacy nor has he appeared in court when subpoenaed (and the judge in Georgia did nothing except rule for Barry). So the AG will get in touch with the judge and the judge will rule in Barry’s favor for some obscure reason – like the presidente is too busy to give the court his papers. He has gotten away with believing he is above the law for four years already.

      • Somehow, he’s immune from all subpoenas simply because the Secret Service won’t let anyone get close enough to serve one! Didn’t other presidents get subpoenaed? Nixon, for example? This surely cannot be Constitutional. NOBODY is above the law. Hiding from the subpoena is evidence of guilt, imho.


      WASHINGTON D.C. – Though resident of the District of Columbia are denied the right to voting Representation in Congress and to control their local affairs – rights all other United States citizens enjoy – the residents of the District of Columbia have been exclusively granted by Congress a right no non-District of Columbia resident possesses: The right to a post-election challenge to the qualifications for office of any elected official. That statutorily-granted legal “standing” to challenge qualifications is found at D.C. Code §11-1001.11(b)(1).

      Accordingly, Montgomery Blair Sibley has this day filed a Petition for Review in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals seeking to challenge the qualifications of Barack Hussein Obama, II to occupy the Office of President of the United States. Additionally, Mr. Sibley has filed an Omnibus Motion in that matter seeking subpoenas for Mr. Obama’s: (i) original birth certificates, (ii) Selective Service and Social Security records, (iii) college applications and transcripts from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School and (iv) his passport records – all documents Obama has refused to reveal.

  4. Read this and prepare to be infuriated. This is their mindset:

    Larry Summers, chair of the White House National Economic Council when the 2009 stimulus was developed, suggested that President Obama will eventually tax and regulate junk food to drive people to eat more healthily — although he dinged First Lady Michelle Obama’s healthy foods initiative.

    “I think there is no question that the way Americans eat and what Americans weigh is a big contributor to health problems and it’s a big contributor to health costs,” Summers said on Morning Joe today. It’s not the agenda now, but I think at some point you’re going to see tax measures and regulatory measures that are going to be directed at helping people be healthier. That’s just going to happen and I think it’s probably a good thing when it does.””

    Nowhere in his ideology is any consideration that human beings are FREE INDIVIDUALS who are NOT subject to an overweening, dictatorial nanny government that will decide EVEN WHAT WE PUT INTO OUR MOUTHS.

    • How could they do this on a federal level? I can see them trying it on a city or state level, but not at the federal level. Bloomie of NY City fame who put into the law that people can’t sell a Big Gulp, and forced people to purchase a smaller one, will be so happy. Those junk food addicts are going to make the cost of Obamacare go up…and they don’t want that to happen. No worries, they have already thought of that with their death panels and those pre-death chats with the doctors.

      What I predict is that people are going to become so unhappy with the transformation of the US and the lack of jobs that obesity will rise not fall. Potato use will increase because of the high cost of foods, and meat consumption will fall dramatically – food stamps aren’t enough to cover meat costs. I also predict that MO’s butt will get larger even if she is eating arugula daily from her sewage garden.

      • They use cigarette taxes as an example. They think that they have opened the door to this by making Obamacare publicly funded. In their world, this means that when someone is in Obamacare (as if there’s a choice) then that gives everybody else who pays for it a say in what someone puts into his or her mouth. I say, therefore, by the same logic, then we all should get a say in other lifestyles that cause diseases. For example, someone who engages in unsafe sex. How about someone who engages in unprotected gay sex and acquires AIDS? Should society have to pay the millions to care for that person who could have easily avoided the situation had he simply used protection? You can really take it to extremes.

        If a person didn’t get AIDS via a bad transfusion (or a needle stick, in the case of a health care provider), then we KNOW how the person got it and that person is responsible for the situation. Either unsafe sex or IV drug use and sharing needles. Right?

        How about other STDs? How about genital warts? If a girl contracts it and later on gets cervical cancer, should society pay for her treatment? What if it’s really expensive to treat because she didn’t get Pap smears and so it was caught late? Why should society pay?

        How about rich people who ski? What if Sonny Bono had not died but had ended up in a vegetative state and required long-term expensive care 24/7? Should society have to pay for his care when it was his lifestyle that caused his situation? That’s a risky behavior that most people can’t afford! How many of the ordinary people who pay for Obamacare can afford to fly off to Aspen for a ski vacation? That’s not fair besides being risky business!

        How about Barry? If he goes surfing over the holidays in Hawaii and gets injured (allah forbid!) and ends up needing weeks in the hospital to recuperate, is it fair to society that we have to pay for it when, if he only didn’t engage in that “sport”, he’d not be a burden to society?

        There’s a lot of stuff that people do that ends up causing them to need expensive health care. It’s not just junk food.

        People also get throat cancer because of certain sexual practices that transmit the same virus that causes cervical cancer. Should society pay for that, too, when the person could have avoided the illness simply by not engaging in oral sex?

        Michelle’s butt will never get smaller, no matter what she eats or doesn’t eat. It’s a fact of life. It’s there and it ain’t going anywhere.

        • Miri, you are using to much logic to be understood by the Lefties! Facts and critical thinking are the antithesis of the Left. They never let a good fact get in the way of their warped thought processes.

        • Miri, This is so logical, it is poetic.

          • Thanks! I might have to keep gathering examples and make this into a post.

            The problem is that it’s hard to correlate these examples with their typical response–tax and regulate. How do you tax NOT using condoms? How do you regulate NOT practicing safe sex?

            I do think, however, that we can easily slap a huge tax on risky behavior, especially by the rich who, for example, like John Kerry, go wind surfing. Or Barry, who goes surfing. Or even Ann Romney (let’s be fair), who rides horses. Skiing in Aspen? TAX IT! Big time.

            Basically, tax anything that puts them at higher risk for injury that We the People will have to “fix”.

            Besides taxing guys like Robert Kennedy Jr. for the excess FUEL he uses in his private jet, we should slap on an additional “unnecessary CO2 tax” (he could fly commercial) AS WELL AS a “risky behavior tax” because surely the odds are greater that he will be injured in a small plane versus a larger, safer commercial jet.

            I really do think, however, that the way to get them is on sexual lifestyle. On their “choices”.

            Most (if not all) STDs are behavior caused. That’s why they’re “sexually transmitted.” These libs have told us for generations that you don’t pick it up from toilet seats.

            So everybody who practices unsafe sex should pay higher health insurance premiums. Extremely higher premiums. How can we know? First off, if they’re in a monogamous relationship, they get a break on premiums. Easy to see if people are married!

            Then we can track them via their medical records, thanks to Obamacare! We can track them via their credit card purchases, too. If you don’t see condoms bought but you do see oral contraceptives bought, then you have a clue.

            If you see in the doctor’s notes that they admit to risky sexual practices, BIG BROTHER will know.

            Suppose someone turns up with an “unwanted” pregnancy, we’ll know. Slap ’em with higher premiums. Maybe we can have a “one abortion free” option. After that first abortion, slap ’em with the risky behavior tax! And higher premiums until menopause. 🙂 There’s a thought! Unless they’re nuns, anybody who’s of reproductive age, make them pay higher premiums, too. Why should We the People pay for their reproductive choices?

            Who the hell are these people to expect all of society to subsidize their risky choices? Can’t they be responsible?

            Can’t they control what they put into their bodies and how?

            If some person comes down with Hepatitis C, then we have them there, too. It’s either sexual behavior or IV drug use. Both personal choices. We can make an exception for the rare health care provider who contracts it on the job.

            They reap what they sow. I’m not for Big Brother but if that’s the way we’re going, then let’s do this fairly and jump on the bandwagon so that the leftist-brainwashed young people see what they’re buying into.

            • Get taxing risky behavior and they will tax driving automobiles to force us into public/mass transit which they have been very unsuccessful in doing by taking away our big cars and raising the gas prices.

              • True. I’m not advocating any of this. I’m just pointing out their hypocrisy.

                They claim that the reasons they come up with these evil schemes is to save society money, when obviously the real reason is to restrict freedom and TARGET people and lifestyles that they abhor. They want to run other people’s lives as these elites see fit. That’s the bottom line.

                They look around in the world and see FREE people shopping at Wal-Mart, going to McDonald’s, and getting fat (although it’s as likely from the hormones they stuff into food animals than overeating). Then they see poor people starving in Third World countries and THEY decide that somehow life is a zero sum game and if lower-middle-class white-person A in Oklahoma is overweight, then FORCING that person to lose weight will somehow help the starving black person in Ghana.

                It’s not FAIR that we in the USA have created a system that produces so much wealth, and opportunity, and so many FREE CHOICES. They MUST tear us down to the level of poor African countries simply BECAUSE it’s not “fair” that our system provides abundance but the communist, unfree, dicatorial, thuggish systems throughout Africa cause genocide, starvation, death, and despair. Barry is ON RECORD saying that even if taxing the wealthy and destroying their means of creating wealth does NOT help anyone else or solve our debt or deficit, it doesn’t matter. It’s an end unto itself because it’s fundamentally unfair for them to be rich when others are poor, so his solution is to confiscate their wealth, no matter how they earned it. (However, he’s not for confiscating the wealth of the likes of Claire McCaskill or himself. Let’s MEANS TEST federal pensions and health care for congress and the presidents.)

                They look down on the bitter clingers, decide that they eat too much junk food (because they hate individual freedom AND they also hate large, successful corporations) and then decide to REGULATE what people do, as if these stupid, illiterate, white people (you know they’re the real target) need a nanny.

                I heard Claire McCaskill on radio this morning, advocating means testing for Social Security AND for health care premiums. So this is one step beyond.

                Not only do they want to UNFAIRLY turn Social Security, which WAS a retirement program (you pay in; you get back), into a redistribution scheme that penalizes the successful, but now they also want to punish those with “means” by making them pay far more than others do for Obamacare or Medicare, simply because they (rich elites like Claire herself) DECIDE these “folks” have the “means” to do so. In other words, they want to turn Social Security, Obamacare, and Medicare into a wealth redistribution system where those with “means” (as determined by rich, unelected bureaucrats) are taxed and PUNISHED by having their wealth redistributed. They make a special class of those with “means”.

                Those people will pay far beyond what the cost of their health care or retirement is. This is fundamentally UNFAIR, coming from a party that pretends to care about inequality and fairness.

                The rich pay into Social Security based upon their salaries, as does everyone else. Those who pay in more, get higher payments back when they retire. FAIR ENOUGH.

                Right now, a convenience store clerk pays in, as does a wealthy bank VP (e.g., like Madelyn Dunham). Because the clerk paid in less than did Madelyn, the clerk’s Social Security retirement check is LESS than what Madelyn likely got. Is THAT FAIR? It’s not equal but yes, it is FAIR.

                However, Claire and company want to change that. You know that they do. It’s coming. Bank on it!

                They want to make those who make more money pay in a lot more money, despite the fact that they will not proportionately get back the correct amount when they retire. You think that they will also change the system to allow someone who paid in millions get monthly checks in the tens of thousands? Don’t bet on it.

                They want to make the “rich” pay in and then give the proceeds to that convenience clerk to, for example, raise his monthly check to $3000 and lower the “rich” person’s check to the same amount or, more likely, simply say the rich person has the “means”, so that person doesn’t even “need” a monthly check.

                They’re on a tear. They want to increase the estate tax, too, which is nothing more than confiscating wealth to “redistribute” instead of allowing a person to leave the proceeds of a lifetime of hard work to his or her RIGHTFUL HEIRS. This is NOT FREEDOM. This is NOT our system and it is fundamentally un-American.

                They want as much as 70% stolen/confiscated AND they want the taxing to begin after the first million in assets. Even middle class people, these days, if they’ve saved for retirement and purchased a home, have a net worth of a million dollars. They want to confiscate that and redistribute it to the very people who did NOT work hard their entire lives. They want to CHOOSE YOUR HEIRS FOR YOU.

                We will be back to the place we were under guys like Clinton. When, for example, a farmer or small business owner died and his farm or company had to be SOLD OFF in order to liquidate the assets (throwing people out of jobs) in order to pay the estate taxes. But that’s okay. This is Barry’s goal–to DESTROY the economy of the USA.

                • Amen! Amen! You know, you remind me of something that happened to us recently. The chilren are in a virtual public school, which they do at home. This year it was required that parents fill out a form for free lunches. If you don’t qualify for free lunch, you don’t qualify for remedial courses. So, those that qualify, even if they don’t pay property taxes, the school provides. If you don’t qualify, even if pay property tax, you must go find something on your time and dime. When parents just did not fill out the forms, knowing they did not qualify or did qalify but would not want to accept, letters went out saying that anyone that did not fill out the forms would lose their remedial courses and individual plans. This is exactly what you just talked about. It is everywhere.

                  • It is everywhere. That’s another perfect example. No services for the very people who PAY for the services! I was amazed recently when I read a story from a LEFTIST organization that decried the waste in the school free lunch program. The person talked about how milk was provided for the free lunches, but if the kids didn’t take it, or did and didn’t drink it, it was just THROWN AWAY. While there are unemployed people finding empty food pantries, our schools regularly throw away “free lunch” food that the spoiled “poor” children won’t deign to eat or drink. They now have so many choices and THEY are allowed to “choose” NOT to take and drink the FREE MILK being provided for them alone by hard-working TAXPAYERS. And then the schools throw away what the hard-working TAXPAYERS provided for the ungrateful kids who got the hand out.

                    We’ve written about that before–the waste in the free lunch (and free breakfast, snacks and dinner) system. But it’s heartening to finally hear some of the lefties noticing the waste. They’re coming at it from an environmental POV–because cows create “greenhouse gases”–and also from a “compassion” POV because the homeless and the working poor who go to food pantries find them empty, while the schools are required to toss perfectly good food!

    • This is an avenue to tax regular food. Just think if anything with, say, corn syrup as an ingredient is labeled as junk food? Or anything artificial or with dye? Everything except whole foods will be taxed. Eventually that will go one step further to only organic food will be free from tax. After all, some of the chemicals used to grow the non-organic foods will be on the “junk food tax list”. Once the federal government starts the pattern, wouln’t the states see it ok to also include groceries/food available to tax? There is so much more here than a junk food tax, which is not about making/forcing people to eat healthier and/or pay for their bad habits (think of Miri’s logic of more unemployed, less movement, get fatter (paraphrased). It is about owning the people. Own the food, you own the people…..well, the commies will NEVER own a PATRIOT AMERICAN. Live free or die.


    As we knew it would be: Sharia law in the new Egyptian constitution. Rushed to get it finished before the courts could call a halt to the process. NOT ONE Christian involved or any secular or “liberals” allowed to be involved. Just a bunch of radical Islamist wrote this “moderate” constitution.

    “Egypt’s Constituent Assembly decided on Thursday to keep “principles of sharia” or Islamic law as the main source of legislation, leaving the article’s language unchanged from the previous constitution.”

    Al Arabiya mentions liberals but the story I read in the lamestream today says they were all shut out of the process.


    • Huma is talking with them through her mother who is in the Muslim Brotherhood’s Sisterhood. No problem, we will continue to send Egypt money because they covered the lie for Obama about the amateur video being the cause of rioting.

    “The Obama administration’s opening bid on Thursday in negotiations to avert a year-end fiscal crunch included a demand for new stimulus spending and authority to unilaterally raise the U.S. borrowing ceiling, a Republican congressional aide said.

    The proposal, made by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to congressional Republican leaders on Capitol Hill, was seen as offering little the Republicans could agree to and was greeted with laughter, the aide said.

    “We can’t move any closer to them because they’re not even on our planet,” the aide said. “It was not a serious proposal.””

    Barry wants $50 BILLION in more stimulus and he wants money to help foreclosed homeowners and he wants money to let people who’ve already been on unemployment for two years stay on it AND he wants unilateral and permanent power to raise the debt limit as he sees fit.

    • Can we use Auntie Madder’s photo above as a response! He wants permanent power as in DICKtator? Yeah that’s the ticket again, more stimulus money for his cronies that went to projects that his cronies couldn’t get through Congress. Wasn’t Biden in charge of making sure those jobs were created and the money spent wisely? What a joke. Billions spent with nothing but bankrupted green companies to show for it. Another try at Keynesian tactics that have been proven a complete failure!

    • WZ thinks along the same lines.

      Pelosi Supports Giving Obama “Unilateral Control” To Put America Into As Much Debt As He Pleases…

      Nov. 30

      Let’s just make him dictator and get it over with.

    • Is the Right learning Alinsky? Ridiculing? The Administration is a Joke and worth laughing at and about. I would probably have spit out my drink if I was drinking and heard the proposal.!

      Mitch McConnell ‘Bursts Into Laughter’ At Obama’s Fiscal Cliff Proposal
      November 30, 2012 by Tim Brown Snip

      Apparently Barack Obama’s fiscal cliff proposal is so one-sided, partisan, and ridiculous that Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell says he “burst into laughter” during the talks on Thursday when Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner explained the Obama administration’s proposal to avert the fiscal cliff.
      In addition the Daily Caller reported that Obama wanted more stimulus and be allowed to control the nation’s debt ceiling. Neil Munro writes, “President Barack Obama has dramatically upped his demands in the fiscal crisis negotiations: He wants Congress to levy twice as much in extra taxes from Americans as he urged during the election campaign, give up its control over the nation’s debt limit, and fund an immediate $50 billion stimulus for his political priorities.”

      “In exchange, Obama offered to consider,” Monro wrote, “but not necessarily accept — GOP proposals for cutting $400 billion from Medicare and other programs strongly favored by off-year voters.”

      • one needs to read Lenin’s tactics and his economy to understand where Obama and his appointed socialists are taking us. Alinsky is only a tool for the socialist masses , media, and activists to perpetuate the Marxist doctrines of an Obama regime. This administration is almost a duplicate of Lenin’s blueprint for the intellectual socialist’s paradigm, which failed miserably economically. As Russia’s economy went off the fiscal cliff as planned to destroy the capitalist system and crush the bourgouisie, then the government used the army for the labor force, and the labor force into a wing of the army. Read on Lenin’s economy if you want to know what Obama has in store for us. It’s uncanny the similarities.

  7. listen to the few last words.. off the mike…. funny… Bill Clinton

  8. Hoot… let’s add it to the BobbleHead Jar .. part II …I’d like to slice it, dice it, cube it, chop it, fry it, grate it, stir-fry it, boil it, bake it, mash it, good …
    Sick of him always … stickin’ it 2 us all…. ah, now i feel better….

  9. Here We Go Again- Ted Cruz Already Running for President?
    GeorgeM at 30 November

    Cruz, who is the biggest anti-birther in Texas, seems to be positioning himself already for a run at the Presidency in 2016! Ted Cruz, having not even started his term as Senator, is already feeling out a run for President. By the way, he was born in Canada in 1970 to a Cuban father and American mother. Sound familiar? Let’s nip this one in the bud.

    While some critics contend that Cruz is not eligible to run for president since he was born in Canada, he has asserted that doesn’t preclude him from the office.

    “The Constitution requires that one be a natural-born citizen, and my mother was a U.S. citizen when I was born,” he told The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza.

    Earth to Cruz- Please read:
    Texplainer: Could Canadian-Born Ted Cruz Be President?

    Amazing how the LA Times (Slimes) takes a very different position when a Republican is involved:

    Questions About the Qualifications of Ted Cruz – the GOP’s Newest Star

    • OMG. For real? He wasn’t even born in the USA? I’m getting sick to my stomach. We don’t need a Republican hispanic Barry.

    • Air Force Brat!

      Guess he’s never heard of the Supreme Court ruling in Minor v. Happersett.

    • Is Cruz even eligible for to serve as US Senator? According to the US Constitution and Canadian law in 1970, was he, at birth, a citizen of Canada or a citizen of the US, or both? If he wasn’t a dual citizen or a US citizen at birth, did he go through the process and take the oath to become a naturalized citizen of the US?

      • Good questions. He was elected by the TX Tea TEA Party so I hope they did their homework. Although the TEA Party wasn’t interested in the eligibility issue. To bad they didn’t want to take it on. They were more concerned with taxes.

        • In fairness, the TEA in TEA Party (yes, “TEA” should be all caps) is an acronym for “Taxed Enough Already.” The amount of taxes they’re already paying was the reason the parties (plural, as there is no national TEA Party) were formed. Unfortunately, with “wealthy” being a subjective word and the annual earnings amount already reduced at least a couple of times by the Choom Gang, their cause has most likely been lost. Though most TEA Partiers are middle class, they can and should expect their taxes to increase, not decrease.

    • Rose Mary Woods, Devoted Nixon Secretary, Dies
      January 24, 2005

      Rose Mary Woods, the loyal secretary and friend of President Richard Nixon, has died at age 87.

      No matter where the truth lies, Woods will be remembered for the infamous 18.5-minute gap in one of the Watergate tapes, not because she erased it, but because she said she had erased only part of it by mistake. There’s that famous photo of her trying to demonstrate how she could have accidentally erased it — it’s known as the “Rose Mary Stretch.”
      “She wasn’t involved in the cover-up,” he says. “She was involved in being loyal and fighting for her boss.”

  10. White House opposed new Iran sanctions
    November 30, 2012

    The White House announced its opposition to a new round of Iran sanctions that the Senate unanimously approved Friday, in the latest instance of Congress pushing for more aggressive punitive measures on Iran than the administration deems prudent.

    On Thursday, Sens. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and Mark Kirk (R-IL) introduced the amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which the Senate passed 94-0. The new legislative language would blacklist Iran’s energy, port, shipping, and shipbuilding sectors, while also placing new restrictions on Iran’s ability to get insurance for all these industries. The legislation would also vastly expand U.S. support for human rights inside Iran and impose new sanctions on Iranians who divert humanitarian assistance from its intended purpose.
    But the White House told several Senate offices Thursday evening that the administration was opposed to the amendment…..“We do not believe additional authority to apply more sanctions on Iran is necessary at this time,” [Is Jarrett involved in this decision – against a Senate vote to impose more sanctions – Vote of 94 – Zero! The Democratically controlled Senate opposes BHO?]


    • “The truth is that the U.S. Congress continues to lead a comprehensive and unrelenting international sanctions program against the Iranian regime despite a comprehensive and unrelenting campaign by this administration to block or water down those sanctions at every move,” a senior GOP Senate aide told The Cable. “We beat them 100-0 last year and while they tried to kill this amendment more quietly this time, we beat them again 94-0. Hopefully House and Senate negotiators will stay strong and resist the administration’s strategy to dilute these sanctions in conference.”

  11. Previously, Gohmert joined Michelle Bachman in wanting an investigation of Huma Abedin Weiner’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.

    GOP Rep. Gohmert: “Only Way To Explain” Obama’s “Horrendous” Decisions On Arab World Is He Has “A Bunch of Muslim Brotherhood Members Giving Them Advice…(Video)
    November 29, 2012 Snips

    Speaking with Secure Freedom Radio host Frank Gaffney this week, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) alleged that the Obama administration has actively aided al Qaeda and follows the advice of the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Gohmert told Gaffney that anti-Muslim investigations are necessary because President Barack Obama made “horrendous decisions” in backing the “revolutions in Northern Africa and across the Middle East and to the Far East.” He chalked such decisions up to the administration listening closely to the advice of Muslim Brotherhood members.
    Later on in the program, Gohmert accused the president of “wanting a new Ottoman Empire to take place” by allegedly “allowing” al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood to take over in post-Gaddafi Libya.

  12. Tim Hawkins on National Anthems
    Tim would love to hear some of his favorite artists perform our National Anthem.


  13. This case will affect other industries and go way beyond books.

    Will the Supreme Court Kill Used Bookstores?
    The ruling in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons just may do that.
    November 28, 2012

    On October 29, the Supreme Court heard the arguments of a copyright case involving the right to resell imported goods in the United States. The goods in question were college textbooks but the outcome could affect whether copyrighted goods made overseas can be resold in the U.S. without consent from the copyright holder. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. may focus on the five-pound appendages lugged around by undergraduates, but any product made overseas with a U.S. copyright—from shoes to laptops—could be affected. That makes Kirtsaeng potentially one of the most important decisions the Court will make this season.

  14. Frightening to think about. But we must consider it a plan of the Left.

    Michael Savage on Obama Eliminating Term Limits! – (11/29/12)

    He thinks that the Democrats will try to run Obama again for a third term and more (lifetime) and they will try to eliminate term limits. The corrupt DemoncRat party will do nothing to stop him. The Democrats will try to pack the Supreme Court with NWO psychotics. Franklin D. Roosevelt was president for 13 years, and that is who Obama will want to emulate. Obama has no regard for the Constitution, and he studied it to find out how to go around it.

    The 22nd AMENDMENT was passed in 1951. The amendment limits a president to two four-year terms.

  15. Written by a bot.

    Orly Taitz Loses in Court Again, This Time to Trump Barack Obama Via College Records
    By Matt Coker Fri., Nov. 30 2012 at 4:40 PM

    Taitz marched into Orange County Superior Court trying to get Occidental College of Los Angeles to release the president’s undergraduate grades and other records–and walked out denied yet again.
    Orange County Superior Court Judge Charles Margines sided with Oxy and, as other jurists have noted of Taitz’s legal funny papers, observed her subpoena and motions were riddled with fundamental procedural errors. He ordered her to pick up Occidental’s $4,000 attorney and court costs and offered this parting shot:

    “You should know that evidence is not stuff printed from the Internet.”

  16. Obama’s victory still disputed
    By ANGEL CASTILLO JR. | Florida Voices
    December 01, 2012 Snip

    In a largely forgotten court case being litigated in Tallahassee, lawyers are still arguing about whether President Barack Obama was qualified to run for president in the first place.

    Attorney Larry E. Klayman of Washington, D.C., a controversial Republican activist, and his client, Michael C. Voeltz, a registered Democrat from Broward County, have refused to concede the election outcome. They are still pursuing an Obama “birther” challenge in an appeal in Tallahassee.

    The judges of the Florida First District Court of Appeal have refused to submit the case immediately to the Florida Supreme Court, as requested by Klayman. On Nov. 27 they also refused Klayman’s request that the court handle the appeal on an expedited basis.

    Klayman is advancing two arguments: (1) Obama has never established that he is a “natural born citizen” as required under Article II of the U.S. Constitution because his Hawaii birth certificate posted online “has either been altered or is entirely fraudulent”; and (2) Obama was born to a mother who was a United States citizen and a father who was a citizen of Kenya, and to be a “natural born citizen” a candidate for president must have been born in this country to two U.S. citizen parents.

    • Eligibility challenge returns to haunt Florida
      ‘Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States’
      Dec. 1, 2012 Snip

      A lawsuit challenging Barack Obama’s presence on the 2012 presidential election ballot because of questions over his constitutional eligibility that was thrown out by a judge who earlier determined it wasn’t timely has returned to haunt election officials in the state with a request that the Obama victory results be quashed.

      “Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States, and its Constitution, which plaintiff must protect and defend by oath,” according to the complaint, which was delivered to Secretary of State Ken Detzner today.
      The case asks the Florida Elections Canvassing Commission to decertify the Florida General Election upon a “judicial determination of the ineligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as president … and to certify the electors for Mitt Romney as the winner.”

      Klayman has argued that since Obama, by his own admission, was not born to two citizen parents, he is not a “natural born citizen” and, therefore, is ineligible to be a candidate on the state’s election ballot.

      Florida’s election statutes provide broad protections for voters to ensure that the integrity of the election system is beyond reproach. One of the laws allows voters to challenge the nomination of a candidate who is not eligible for the office he is seeking.

  17. Another brilliant idea by the Obama Administration – take the Student Loan Industry from the private sector and turn it over to the government. Now we’ll pay for all the grads who can’t find jobs to pay off their loans. But will their defaulting be on their credit reports? Hey, what’s another TRILLION $ on the back of the taxPAYERS.

    Trillion-Dollar Student Loan Industry to be Bailed Out by Taxpayers
    Dec. 1

    The latest sector to benefit from a taxpayer-subsidized bailout is the taxpayer-subsidized student loan industry. Currently, student loan debt is larger than credit card debt. Collectively, students have racked up nearly $1 trillion in loan debt. And it’s all thanks to government taking over the student loan industry which prompting schools and universities to increase their tuition fees and diminish their own aid programs.
    This bailout hasn’t happened yet, but it’s being proposed as part of the fiscal cliff negotiations, and I’d be surprised if it didn’t pass. The Student Loan Forgiveness Act provides debt forgiveness to all student loan recipients who have paid 10% of their discretionary incomes toward their loans for 10 years. If the recipients go into teaching, “public service” or medicine in underserved areas, their debts will be forgiven after only 5 years of such payments.

    • The way things are going, credit reports will become useless lists because no one will be able to keep theirs clean. Credit scores will become a thing of the past for the same reason.

    • I visit here often but comment rarely. The government takeover of student loans was no coincidence. What deeply concerns me is the large number of young people who are in debt to the government for student loans. Since there are no jobs, how many of these young people will be required to work off their debt by enlisting in the FEMA Youth Corps?

      Or maybe maybe they’ll volunteer through the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act. Apparently, when you enlist, you relinquish your Constitutional rights…….

      The Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act……. [January 6, 2009]
      (a) Prohibited Activities- An approved national service position under this subtitle may not be used for the following activities:
      (1) Attempting to influence legislation.
      (2) Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes.
      (3) Assisting, promoting, or deterring union organizing.
      (4) Impairing existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements.
      (5) Engaging in partisan political activities, or other activities designed to influence the outcome of an election to Federal office or the outcome of an election to a State or local public office.
      (6) Participating in, or endorsing, events or activities that are likely to include advocacy for or against political parties, political platforms, political candidates, proposed legislation, or elected officials.
      (7) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of proselytization, consistent with section 132.
      READ MORE…

      • I’m sure they all abide by those prohibitions! In fact, those I know who have entered these “services” go in conservative and come out leftists. Here’s another candidate for Barry’s civilian “army” as big and powerful as our military:

        “… This legislation authorized the establishment of a citizen corps of professional technologists, similar to the National Guard. The men and women who joined up would be organized, trained, and could be activated and deployed whenever disaster strikes.

        Although this bill passed the Senate 97-0 and was incorporated into the Homeland Security Act of 2002, sadly neither the Bush nor Obama administrations has used the authority in the statute to organize this potentially life- and property-saving resource. … These private volunteers could be more effective if they were allowed to work directly with government agencies. That is our vision of NET Guard. ­Technology companies with thousands of employees—such as Intel, Google, Apple, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle would allow them to periodically receive training from the government on disaster response, on coordinating their efforts with government agencies, and other skills. Then, after a disaster, the president could activate these NET Guard volunteers and ­deploy them wherever they are needed. Because they are members of NET Guard, their jobs would be held for them, as is done for members of the National Guard.

        NET Guard teams could also work with federal, state and local officials on emergency-communication plans that could be put into motion even before a major storm hit, or immediately after an unexpected disaster like an earthquake or terrorist attack. … The Obama administration now has dramatic evidence of the need to set up a NET Guard to help victims of future disasters recover and reconstruct their lives.

      • Thanks for visiting often and also for commenting, whenever the urge strikes!

  18. Coming to a Democratically controlled state near you. Another CA bankrupted city.

    City Attorney of Bankrupt San Bernardino: ‘Lock Your Doors and Load Your Guns’
    Dec.1, 2012

    City attorney of San Bernardino Jim Penman had the audacity to tell the truth to the residents of bankrupt San Bernardino at a recent city council meeting. Taking stock of the fact that San Bernardino’s murder rate has jumped 50 percent over the last year, that the city has been cutting its police force by about 80 officers, and that there is no good news in sight, Penman stated, “lock your doors and load your guns.” He stands by the statement today, explaining, “you should say what you mean and mean what you say.”


  19. United States of Chicago: Middle Class Net Worth Collapses to 1969 Levels
    1 Dec 2012

  20. We’ll watch other major corporations do the same thing. Business is still business, and they will watch their bottom line.

    ObamaCare Fallout: Walmart Ends Insurance For New Hires
    Dec. 1 Snip

    By making the fine for not providing health care cheaper than providing health care, this was always the plan: to encourage employers to send us to the government.

    Remember how Obama’s big ObamaCare sell was, “You get to keep the health insurance you have”?

    It was all a lie, a hustle, a con, a ruse…

    But now it’s the law of the land … forever.

  21. Woman Power! Impressive that women are trained in Israel.

    Israeli Mother Fights Off Terrorist, Saves Two Young Children
    Dec. 1, 2012

    But Yael Matzpun was trained in Krav Maga, Israeli military hand-to-hand combat.

  22. Obama Slaps States That Don’t Comply With Obamacare
    Saturday, December 01, 2012

    Residents of states that refuse to set up health insurance exchanges under Obamacare are set to be hit with higher premiums under new rules announced by the Health and Human Services Department. Insurance companies will be charged 3.5 percent of any premiums they sell through the federal exchanges, the department announced Friday. And insurers are likely to pass that surcharge on to clients, leaading to higher premiums. The only states to be affected are those that refuse to set up their own exchanges because of opposition to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer announced this week that her state will not set up an exchange, calling the proposal “too expensive and too risky.” Her decision brings the total of states refusing to comply with the act’s provisions up to 17.

  23. There is No Fiscal Cliff
    November 30, 2012
    Newt Gingrich

    How many times have you heard about the terrible, frightening, all-imposing “fiscal cliff” in the last few weeks?

    Now we have a constant media drumbeat that Republicans will have to cave to President Obama’s demands or they will bear responsibility for going over the fiscal cliff.

    President Obama has increased his demands for more taxes and more spending.

    The Left, both the politicians and the news media, have created a mythical threat which can only be solved by Republicans surrendering their principles and abandoning their allies.

    Yet the fiscal cliff is entirely a manufactured threat.

  24. What we never wanted was a Commie in the WH. Doesn’t the support of BHO by the Communist party tell you what you need to know.

    Communist Party USA: Go, Obama, Go!
    Organization staging events to encourage higher taxes, spending
    Nov. 29

    The Communist Party USA, which just days ago boasted of its celebration over the election victory by Barack Obama, now is organizing teleconferences and promoting rallies in support of Obama’s plans to raise taxes – and to demand full government funding for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid “and other basic human needs.”

    According to a statement from the communists, it is the “will of the voters” that Obama be allowed to “end … tax breaks for the wealthiest.” And the party said no spending cuts should be allowed because they would be borne by the “working class families, starting with children and youth and the most vulnerable.” [ Will of the voters, my a@@, it is the friggin’ ignorance of the voters, and the coverup and propaganda by the media that led to this threat to our freedom and liberty!]

  25. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Joe McCarthy was right. And unless we fight back, the Communists will win. WHAT, EXACTLY, ARE WE WAITING FOR?! Actually, we seem to be waiting for a leader. It is NOT too late. We have become weak and easily led by group think as opposed to the rugged individualism this nation was built on. The Founding Fathers would not be pleased (an understatement if I’ve ever written one!)

    • We already have a leader, Yahweh, but most folks don’t realize it yet.

      • It is my understanding that God answers in three ways:

        “No, not right now. There is more to learn.” or
        “A resounding, Yes!”

        I believe He answered “No, not right now.” He has his reasons, and I think faith has to be brought back into our lives. If 75% of our USA are Christians and they all turned out to vote, it would be a grand slam for the party that does believe in God, and that don’t want him removed from the party platform. The Radical Commies want God removed and they proved it at their convention. They want Obama to act as the messiah and worship him as a false idol. Obama certainly has no morals or integrity to speak of, and he will meet his maker for Judgment Day. God will speak to him at that time and ask which commandment didn’t you break?

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        Of course, you are right, kittycat.

    • Allen West was right too when he said the black caucus was made up of socialists and communists. For four plus years, the Left has demoralized the masses. What is the use said many, and they stayed home. The Paul Bots were angry and stayed home; did they prove their point? Perhaps, but they also endangered the entire country by thinking of themselves. The Evangelicals didn’t get behind a republican nominee either. They can be to blame too. The Tea Party didn’t get behind Obama’s ineligibility either and that might have helped get us across the finish line. Remember the totals that Trump was getting when he wasn’t even running for office when he brought up Obama’s BC? Lots of blame to go around. Perhaps all those that stayed home will now understand how important the vote was. The Republicans are at blame for the lawsuit they signed years ago saying they couldn’t fight voter fraud; and they better get that lawsuit voided before the next election. There will be no excuse not to do so.

      We are headed down the road to communism, there is no mistaking what the Leftist radicals are doing. We need to use the term Communist Obama instead of president Obama whenever we can to get it into people’s heads as to what we are up against. Name every single Democrat, a commie. Label them like they labeled birfers (how endearing) and regular normal citizens as extremists, only the term commie and radical have real meaning.

    • Bravo, Rosemary Woodhouse…tellin’ it like it is!

  26. Rosemary Woodhouse

    I agree, Bridgette. The fact that we are just now awakening to this decades-in- the-planning-and-implementation of this “plot” (for lack of a better word) is what’s so frightening. We ignored so many signs, so many things that were wrong for decades. IMO, it started in the 60s when the entire culture changed. We are the guilty ones.

    So many of us pled our case to the Paul-bots to no avail. They dug their heels in and now are as culpable as those who voted for this monster!

    • We could see it coming, but we had no idea how the media would fall in line and only present one side, and it was not just one person or anchor. That they refused to do normal vetting was astounding, and that not one Congressman would question him or his eligibility still boggles our minds. The lies, deceit, and twisting of information instead of giving facts is beyond my comprehension. I think we were supposed to become aware of the corruption in all areas, that is the only thing that makes sense to me. I believed we were protected by checks and balances and the judiciary…boy, was I wrong. How many cases regarding his eligibility were filed? Close to 100, and not once did a judge demand the usurper to show proof and authentic documents. I’d read about corruption but never in my wildest dreams did I think we’d see so much and watch it in so many arenas without any punishment or consequences meted out.

      You are right, the signs were there, but they were scattered signs. It took thousands of people on blogs to start piecing it all together, I think. We were all trying to make sense out of what we were seeing and no one believed it could get so far in such a short time…a short time to us, and a long time planning by them. I pray that we can right the ship of fools before it is totally out of hand. We must. Those that fought wars for our freedom against the likes of Hitler, Stalin and most recently terrorists must be turning over in their graves.

      • “I believed we were protected by checks and balances and the judiciary.”

        Me, too. Boy! Were we all so very wrong. They salted the judiciary with their corrupt judges, and they play games with the jurisdictions to get the cases before “friendly” judges or judges who can be successfully leaned on, for whatever reason. The judiciary is no longer independent–it’s all political. The RINOs are to blame, too, however. By their “gentlemanly” behavior of bowing to the majority party, they’ve allowed the benches to be larded with commies, socialists, and lefties.

      • I think we were supposed to become aware of the corruption in all areas, that is the only thing that makes sense to me.

        IMO, Bingo!

        If we look at Soros’ MO for bringing down governments through monetary, media, politicial, etc., manipulations, disputed elections, as well as revealing real and contrived-by-his-influence corruption, are his mainstays in getting a people to demand democracy, AKA a new government. Riots in the streets! Oh yeah! Demand an overthrow of government! Demand a new constitution!

        The leftist hail Soros, a wanted felon in 4 or 5 countries for his financial crimes, as a great guy who helped rid countries of corrupt, oppressive regimes to bring ‘democracy’. What’s wrong with that? Of course, the Koch Brothers are horrible greedy guys, who are, however, not felons and aren’t wanted across the globe. Never mind that Soros made billions off the collapse of those economies; never mind that he destroyed the wealth, the life savings or few assets individuals had in his un-requested aid to save the people from bad governments, which in truth, may have been bad, but were not his plaything; never mind that in his own words he called his youth as a Nazi associate that helped send real people to camps as the best time of his life or how all those other countries he manipulated were just practice in preparation of the ‘big’ accomplishment he plans. He’s the patron saint of the delusional left. But then, what should we expect from a group of people who are bound together by a singular principle: “By any means necessary.” When that’s your only unwavering principle, when your guidance in life is so fluid you can pivot from one position to its polar opposite in the blink of an eye without even noting the hypocrisy, you embrace being a virtue-impoverished manipulator that willingly allows yourself to be manipulated—by any means necessary. You become nothing more than the means to secure someone else’s goal–a goal, I might add, that will condemn you to the same fate as everyone else caught in its destruction. The ‘means’ are disposal when they have served their purpose. Not very flattering for a bunch that prides themselves on their intellectual prowess, but true.

        So, yes, I agree with Bridgette that we’re supposed to see the corruption. We supposed doubt the election results. We’re supposed to feel Congress is inept, that the judiciary has ideologically abandoned the Rule of Law, and that the executive branch is filled with subversives and power-hungry thieves. We supposed to be angry, beaten down by the long train of abuses into hopelessness that the system can be saved. We’re supposed to be out in the streets rioting and demanding the ouster of the chief executive and his overstepping law-breaking administration and if we don’t, someone else will be tapped for the job. We’re supposed to give up essential liberty for temporary safety by begging someone, anyone, to save us when everything turns bad and bloody. Out of chaos comes order. And that new order is waiting in the wings to save us from that flawed Constitution and what it has caused. Never mind that it’s the people that are flawed and that not abiding by the Constitution is what caused the rampant corruption. We’re not supposed to notice that part.

        • Well said 7! If we hadn’t seen it, we wouldn’t know how far and how deep the corruption is. Now we have to find solutions. Soros and his communist pals are steps ahead of us in their planning. They been infiltrating the schools, government, denouncing Christianity, rewriting history books, and placing their commie friends in strategic positions of power. They even paid off bots to hide laws about Minor and Happerstat so those looking for eligibility information were unable to find it on the internet. They placed people that were in agreement into spots of on TV news shows, and made sure that producers of those programs were of the same mind set so that negative information wouldn’t be telecast. Then Soros bought up television and radio stations to make sure that the propaganda was spread throughout the US. They’ve learned all about voter fraud and how to get away with it too. When the Communist party is celebrating Obama’s reselection, we know there is a real problem. Also we shouldn’t forget the other person who is behind the scenes, Maurice Strong, who helped bring Agenda 21 into being under Clinton, and that is putting our sovereignty at risk as well as pushing us toward a NWO to be governed by the UN. Leon Panetta, a communist sympathizer, if not an infiltrator, even said that he had to go to the UN for guidance when questioned.

          I wonder how many bills were passed that had the footnote attached as to where it was found in the Constitution that they had the power to legislate whatever they were proposing. Recall that Boehner said any bill that came forward had to show that information. We thought that was putting us on the right path.

        • Excellent! You nailed it. They want “democracy” for sure. MOB RULE. They want tyranny. They want to IMPOSE what they cannot achieve through democracy! The people of the USA will not vote for their style of “democracy” if they know the TRUTH. They must be fooled by all this corruption.

          What the left wants is what we see in Egypt. Obama as Morsi. Morsi as Obama. As they accuse the conservatives of seeking to overthrow the government, it’s exactly what they plan to do, by any means necessary.

    • Had those who voted for the Libertarians voted for Romney, PERHAPS we wouldn’t be in this situation today. They still would have pulled off their vote fraud.

    • Not my intent to let third-party voters off the hook, but I really believe 90% of the voters could have voted for Romney and Obama would have still won. Part of the game is to get us all blaming one another so our eyes keep off the obvious, which is Obama lost by huge numbers. As long as we are blaming others for losing we are saying and believing we lost and thus, do not realize we are the masses and can say, as a mass, NO.

  27. Please watch this video on Youtube. It explains how Hitler took over Germany, and, how , the same methods are being used today in USA. Hilmar Von Campe ( look in Youtube) was in Hitler youth and was a WW2 veteran. He is now a US citizem and devout Christian. His video ( just over 1 hour long) is the most important thing I have seen in years. May God bless him and use this video to open people´s eyes

    • Welcome Madeleine. You didn’t leave a link, so we don’t know which one of his you are referring to. I found this one, and don’t know if it is the right one. There are several.

      Published on Sep 18, 2012 by TheAlexJonesChannel

      Former Hitler Youth member and World War Two veteran Hilmar Von Campe warns that America’s collective turn away from God is greasing the skids for the state to take over as the ultimate authority, threatening a repeat of the rise of National Socialism, as he warns that the Obama White House and the United States government in general now more closely embrace the political doctrines of the Nazis than they do those of the founding fathers.

      Von Campe explains how when he returned from the war he was determined to find out how the Germans, a relatively cultured and civil people before the rise of the Nazis, could have allowed a monster like Hitler to implement the Third Reich. Von Campe attributes the fall of Germany to the Nazis partly to “Godlessness,” a collapse in moral standards, and the German people acting contrary to God’s desires. Based on this revelation, he has created a formula to try and prevent countries from succumbing to tyranny in future.

      Von Campe explains how children were indoctrinated by the state and the education system to uphold Nazi beliefs and then spy on and inform on their parents if they didn’t follow suit, as a way of breaking up families and enforcing a single ideology. He also reveals how the Nazis insisted upon discussion about religion and God being kept out of society, in the interests of ensuring that the people could not call on a higher authority than the state and therefore were less inclined to resist the Nazi takeover.

      Von Campe warns that the process of taking God out of society and education, and the accelerating erosion of America’s Christian foundations bears startling similarities to how National Socialism established itself in 1930’s Germany, while chillingly pointing out that the US Senate, House and the Obama White House now more closely resembles the Nazis than it does the founding fathers.

      • Speaking of Hitler, how do you like these apples?

        Hillary Clinton, speaking about Israel and Palestine:
        “So, look, I’m not making excuses for the missed opportunities of the Israelis, or the lack of generosity, the lack of empathy that I think goes hand-in-hand with the suspicion. So, yes, there is more that the Israelis need to do to really demonstrate that they do understand the pain of an oppressed people in their minds, and they want to figure out, within the bounds of security and a Jewish democratic state, what can be accomplished.”

        It’s right on the State Dept. website:

        What community among all the communities in the entire world better understands “the pain of an oppressed people” than the Jewish people, wherever they reside? It’s beyond stupid for Hillary to say such a thing about the Israelis.

      • I watched half of this and he is very interesting. He was brought up a Christian, but the Nazi’s disallowed any reference to God at any time. The Nazi’s started teaching him at age 7 and he was one of the Hitler youths. He enlisted at 18 during WWII, and became a POW. He escaped from a camp with 4 others in Yugoslavia and made his way across Hungary to the demarcation lines and was saved from the Soviets. It was about that time that he realized how brainwashed he was. His lifeline was God.

        Laws were made by the Nazi’s as to what they could say and do. Children were taught to turn in their parents if the parents said anything against the regime…this started at age 7 and was total indoctrination. Parents lived in fear of their children accidentally saying the wrong thing while at school (like all kids do). The Nazis were all about control. He expressed it as God vs Man, and God against Godlessness, and an insurrection against God. He also said it was dangerous to have the government run the public schools.

        You can tell that he watches politics in the US very closely. He said we are on the road to totalitarian system and are far away from what the Founders envisioned. He experienced it so recognizes where we are headed. Those in power can only rule if they can control everybody. If a person has no moral standards, they can’t recognize wrong. We must judge people by their actions, not by what they say.

        He said Nazis are socialists not fascists. The Congress, House, Senators and White House are Nazis. They are closer to being Nazis than the Nazis. Think about it; the Nazis killed 6 – 7 Million Jews and 10 Million others, and the Democrats are killing 50 Million unborn children a year.


    Where’s that WND professor who analyzes Barry’s words and tells us that he’s confessing? I’d love him to parse this one for us:

    “”Joe Biden was in Costco and he wanted to buy some of this stuff, but I told him he had too much work to do. I wasn’t going to have him building roller coasters all day long. Now, of course, Santa delivers everywhere. I’ve been keeping my own naughty and nice list for Washington, so you should keep your eye on who gets some K’NEX this year. There are going to be some members of Congress who get them, and some who don’t,” President Obama said Friday at a rally where he pushed Congress to avoid the fiscal cliff.”

    • We have a naughty and nice list too and that guy that proclaims to be prez is at the top of the naughty list. How funny and ironic that Santa can fill his smelly, holy – scratch that – holey socks with coal from any of the coal mining states that he has put out of business. May it be black, lumpy, dusty, and really odoriferous.

  29. At:
    “What became of Kezia’s child by the man who was NOT her husband?”

    “Obama Mystery Theater: Kezia’s Baby
    Originally posted on November 14, 2011 by Miri”

    • A classic! One of those questions for which we still don’t have an answer! Getting the word out there – wish people would have noticed all of the questions PRIOR TO electing the TWAP again.

    • They’re a little behind the times. Ha! I still want to know. I saw one of those year-end reviews in the paper recently. A list of the 25 best non-fiction books of 2012. Nonfiction! Consider the irony. Maraniss’s book about Barry was on the list. Should have been on the FICTION list!

    • Doesn’t that photo on the left (the “after” image) make him look like he has smoke coming out of his nostrils? (Well, maybe he does. Brimstone fumes.)

      OMG! Right on. I never noticed that Mooch had her nose slimmed, too. She ought to work on the bum next.

      Woweee! Rice surely did have a schnozzle bob! Ye gads. Good work! I did notice how much older she looks NOW compared to the photos they usually put out of her. She was chunkier in the old days, but ordinarily a person’s nose doesn’t get fat. 🙂

    • Barry’s ‘eye teeth’ — compare in pics.

      • Problem is–he had major work done on those teeth. It’s why he lissssssspsssss. The forehead chicken-pox scar is the same.

    • I am amazed that they all apparently wanted to look like the white folk that are considered their enemy according to Black Liberation Theology that Rev. Wright has sermons about. Oh, how silly of me, I forgot they were never in church to hear those sermons. (I’d almost believe it considering they haven’t gone to church except for photo ops while squatting in our WH). What did happen to that saying, Black is beautiful?

      Didn’t we notice before that in earlier photos of BHO that he had a snaggle tooth in the front and then it changed. The photos always show something wrong with the teeth in close-ups. I have never believed that was BHO in that Harvard photo. The two men look similar, but the young face is about 2 inches longer. Can you have a face shortened? Are shaved eyebrows “in” for MO? Is there a “Draw your own brows” for dummies?

      I remember being told that blacks didn’t get much plastic surgery because of their tendency to develop keloids. I guess getting your nose shrunk must be done from the inside so scars won’t show. Now if one was a constant user of cocaine, the nose job might have been done to repair a deviated septum. Cocaine users develop large holes that require surgery. That information might be in his sealed medical records, or perhaps there was no nose job and there are two different people.


      • Yes, you can have a face shortened. I know someone with a genetic problem that caused his chin to grow very long. They fixed it with plastic surgery. What strikes me is how different Barry’s face was at Columbia (rounder head altogether) than at Harvard. They definitely all had nose jobs and I do think that surgeons do it from the inside, but don’t quote me on that! Ashamed of their heritage. That’s all I can think of. Well, VAIN, too. No doubt about it. Actually, that’s just another indication that all were children of privilege. Most “folks” can’t afford plastic surgery. Of course, we don’t all have rich Saudi Muslims who will pay whatever it takes to have us as their puppets.

  30. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Here’s my observation. It’s obviously the same person, and he’s obviously had a “nose job”. His eye teeth….veneers. But…….the arch of his mouth has widened. That is achievable through modern braces, but I’ve never seen a photo of him with them on…has anyone?

    • His teeth – veneers. Funny, though, looking at the left photo the pointy one is on his right. On the right photo the pointy one is on the right. I realize some pictures are reversed, but then, of course that amazing traveling mole would be on the reverse side. Personally, I think most forensic artists would not see the people in the two pics as the same person.

    • I think we’ve seen photos of him without them. Maybe now he has veneers but I think that in the past he had something that could be put in and taken out. Something that superficially made his teeth look better. Or else, something happened to him that really messed up those pearly whites we see in the Columbia U photos, because when he was a state senator, his teeth were horrific. Crooked, for one thing. Unless that was another person.

  31. EXCLUSIVE: WHD Obtains Obama Plan to Fix Economy!
    by Keith Koffler on December 3, 2012, 11:12 am

    White House Dossier has just obtained President Obama’s plan to roll back the crushing long term costs of entitlements, reduce unemployment, and spur the economy back to normal growth.

    Given the importance of this information, we decided to share the plan with you immediately. Here it is:


    I think it’s clear that, despite having taken time out for golf three times already since Election Day, Obama is on the job. I hope you are as reassured as I am.

  32. Continuing the meme, there are no terrorists in the U.S. No doubt he is just another criminal. Hate to offend the .058 % of Muslims in the US by identifying the guy. Hate to show up the Immigration procedures as failing under Obama to allow this guy into the US too. He was in prison in the US and wasn’t deported? The MSM should be accused of aiding and abetting terrorists. Promoting Islamaphobia if they report truth? Expect more of the same type occurrences if these instances aren’t fully reported.

    Iraqi Refugee Bombs AZ Social Security Office, MSM Remains Silent
    3 Dec 2012

    On Friday morning, an Iraqi refugee used an improvised explosive device (IED) to bomb a Social Security office in Casa Grande AZ — the mainstream media remains silent. The explosion took place before the office opened for the morning, so one was hurt. But reports indicate the explosion “was heard and felt all over the area.” The suspect in the bombing, Abdullatif Aldosary is an Iraqi refugee who lives in Coolidge, AZ. He is in police custody. For reasons unreported, Aldosary had raised the Department of Homeland Security’s attention a number of times throughout the last two years, and he served 8 months in prison for harassment at some point.

    On Friday night, both CNN and Reuters reported the bombing, but neither identified Aldosary or mentioned his Iraqi roots. It seems Aldosary is getting the same benefits the MSM gave Major Nidal Hasan, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad, and innumerable other individuals with Middle Eastern names when they committed terrorist acts in our country.

  33. I agree with this writer. Bob Costas was WAY out of line to advocate for gun control during an NFL game! This Belcher guy was a murderer. It wasn’t a “tragedy”; it was cold-blooded murder. Had he not had a gun, he likely would have used another weapon–his fists, a knife, whatever. The locus of control was in Belcher’s head, not in the gun. A few years ago, some thugs murdered two young girls by throwing them off a bridge. If only we didn’t have bridges, those two girls would be alive? NOPE. Murdering thugs will find a way to wreak their havoc. The problem is with the murderer, not with any “gun culture”. Seeing as how this was Sunday Night Football on Obama-loving NBC, it’s really no surprise to see this MSNBC-like opinionating on the FOOTBALL GAME! People ought to boycott, but it’s probably the only game in town and they know it. Costas owes everyone in America an apology. Especially the family of that poor dead girl. You know, every story I saw on TV talked FIRST about the “tragedy” of the murderer being dead. She was the afterthought. She was the TRUE victim, as is the poor orphaned child. One guy even said how tragic it was that she would grow up not knowing her parents, as if the child would want to know the man who murdered her mother!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s