Did You See Election Fraud? What Do You Know?



Crooked Politics: Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law


By American Third Position
Web Team
November 7, 2012


Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.

Romney also likely had the states of  Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs.  Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

Add to all this, electronic vote fraud. An article from the Blaze reports “Last weekTheBlaze  brought you a story from a North Carolina voting precinct using electronic voting machines that was already experiencing issues where votes for GOP candidate Mitt Romney were being changed to Democratic candidate Barack Obama.   Now, it’s allegedly happening again, this time in both Kansas and Ohio — and we talked to a vendor supporting the machines about the issue.   Nancy from Topeka, Kan., who asked that her last name not be used for reasons pertaining to her husband’s work, told TheBlaze she fears if voters aren’t double checking their selections, they’ll be ‘robbed of their vote.’   Nancy explained that while her husband was casting a vote for Romney, the touchscreen highlighted Obama. “He played around with the field a little and realized that in order to vote for Romney, his finger had to be exactly on the mark,” Nancy wrote in an email. She said ‘the invisible Obama field came down about 1/4 [of an inch]‘ into what should technically have been the Romney area”

Funny how this “glitch” only benefited Obama while stealing votes from Romney. I wonder how many other “glitches” were out there and how big a role they played in Obama’s “victory”.

No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. The only way left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office was to steal the election. Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for voters, but he did win all the swing states which require no voter ID. Add to this electronic “glitches” that gave Obama votes meant for Romney, and it’s pretty obvious what happened on November 6th, 2012. We just became a Third World country.

In Chicago, Obama showed his ID before voting.   (Illinois has no Voter ID Law.)

2012 Voter ID Laws:

Voter Id by States

New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; state presently has no voter ID law in effect.

** New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; an older voter ID law remains in effect.

(1) In Alabama, South Carolina and Texas, current non-photo voter ID laws stay in effect for the time being.   The new photo voter ID requirements will take effect after receiving pre-clearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. South Carolina and Texas were denied pre-clearance in December 2011 and March 2012, respectively. Alabama’s new photo ID law has a 2014 effective date, and the state has not yet applied for pre-clearance. The Texas law was recently denied pre-clearance by a federal court in D.C.; a similar court is currently considering South Carolina’s law.

(2) Wisconsin’s voter ID law was declared unconstitutional on March 12, 2012. Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess issued a permanent injunction barring enforcement of the law, which the state has said it will appeal. Read the March 6 injunction and the March 12 injunction.

(3) There are some who prefer to call Oklahoma a photo voter ID state, because most voters will show a photo ID before voting. However, Oklahoma law also permits a voter registration card issued by the appropriate county elections board to serve as proof of identity in lieu of photo ID.

(4) Rhode Island’s voter ID law takes effect in two stages. The first stage, requiring a non-photo ID, took effect on January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2014, a photo ID requirement will replace the non-photo ID law.

(5) Alabama’s new photo ID requirement takes effect with the 2014 statewide primary election. The new law also requires pre-clearance. The delayed implementation date was intended to ensure that the timing of pre-clearance did not occur between the primary and general elections of 2012, thus creating voter confusion.

(6) Mississippi’s new voter ID law was passed via the citizen initiative process. However, the language in constitutional amendment passed by MS voters on Nov. 8 is very general, and implementing legislation will be required before the amendment can take effect. The MS provision will also require pre-clearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act before it can take effect.

(7) A state judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Pennsylvania’s new voter ID law. It will not be in effect for the November 2012 election, and a trial on its permanent status will begin after the election.


 Can You Help Us Prove Obama Stole the Election?

Someone, please help with research that could lead to potential election challenges.

1.  See if there is correlation with Democrat  Senate win and Obama win in states.

2.  In states won by Obama, see what type of voting machines, ballot counters were used.

I believe, of course, there was major ballot stuffing, but we need to think big time.

I believe the results were flipped from Romney to Obama in the swing states.

At this point, we know Obama won only states with no voter ID laws.  We need to come up with other things that can be challenged in federal court.

The media and Google are ensuring you can’t find any voter fraud stories about the election right now.  They are collectively hiding something big.
We are seeking election fraud info, on things such as:

– Impeding military votes
– Discouraging or impeding registration
– Rigged voting machines
– Losing, stealing or destroying ballots
– Rigged vote counting
– Impersonation of registered voters
– Voting multiple times
– Ineligible voters- illegal or out of jurisdiction
– Voter intimidation
– Illegally invalidating voter ID or other laws
– Failure to enforce voting laws

Please do what you can and get back to me ASAP.

For God and The Republic,

Pamela Barnett, Director, Obama State Ballot Challenge, director@obamaballotchallenge.com

Obama Ballot Challenge

Please contact True the Vote or Election Integrity Project if you have information about problems you incurred at the polls.  Citizens are encouraged to report illegal activity at the voting polls by phone, email and video. 

True the Vote Incident Report http://www.truethevote.org/incident-report/

97 responses to “Did You See Election Fraud? What Do You Know?

  1. Hey Anonymous Creeps – You are looking at the wrong party for election fraud! If we had a lawful government that you weren’t helping, they would arrest you for your activities.

    Anonymous: We Hacked GOP on Election Day
    November 18, 2012

    Mitt Romney’s Republican Get Out the Vote system (ORCA) had a meltdown on Election Day leaving some campaign workers wandering around with nothing to do. Now Anonymous has released a video claiming responsibility for jamming ORCA. Anonymous has also hacked some 700 major Israeli websites during the current Hamas-Israel war.


    • They may have done so. I heard on radio that Comcast took down the Romney site because of a suspected “denial of service”. Too much traffic made them believe that the site was spamming, so they took down Romney’s ORCA system that was supposed to help get out the vote. They had multiple other problems, attributed to their own computer illiteracy; but when I heard about the DNS deal, I actually didn’t think it was hacking but instead was just a plan by a complicit ISP to sabotage Romney’s campaign. There’s NOTHING out of the realm of possibility in the Obamanation. This was on Dana Loesch’s show. They said that Romney’s people should have been savvy enough to inform Comcast to expect an unusual amount of traffic to and from their site. Even so, Anonymous might have hacked them.

    • He needed only 250 votes to force a recount. How many times did they rig this to prevent him from getting the 250? I’ve lost count. First there was the original illegal recount of some ballots in order to prevent him from winning by 2000 votes. Then there was the finding of over 300 ballots that weren’t counted (or were they counted twice? At this point, I’ve lost count.) Now it’s deliberately missing the deadline so that the original BOGUS count becomes the “official” results. How can this happen in the USA? It’s appalling and nobody cares, especially the usual suspects who are always around to defend any black person being deprived of equal protection under the law. This, in the deep SOUTH, too! Where’s the ACLU? Where’s Al Sharpton? Where’s Jesse Jackson? Where’s Farrakhan? Are they going to let a young white man STEAL AN ELECTION from an honorable black man like Allen West? Where’s the media, who love to make heroes out of any black person they simply IMAGINE has suffered discrimination? Trayvon Martin, for example.

  2. Not only are the media trumpeting the success of the DemoncRATS in sending more women and minorities into both houses of Congress, they’re also trumpeting the fact that Tea Party candidates who were elected in 2010 were defeated by DemoncRATS who are “returning” to Congress and the Senate this time. Of course, we can figure that the vote fraud that’s endemic in the presidential race was active in these races, too. How ELSE can anyone possibly explain the faux Indian being selected in Massachusetts? I know it’s probably THE most liberal state, but that means they would also be the most likely to be sensitive to the outrage of pretending to be Native American in order to steal special set asides (like scholarships, loans, grants, fellowships) from real “Indians”. We know that they have particularly targeted the Tea Party candidates. That the so-called objective media help in these un-American activities is appalling.


    “Your Republican Party Will not Ask”

    “November 19, 2012 TPATH- There is a strange thing going on in this country and there seems to be no one willing to step up and say “This must stop.” At last count there are over 150 voting districts across this country, where the American people are being asked to either believe or just accept, that not one person in those 150 districts totaling tens of thousands of votes, voted for Mitt Romney.

    Once again conservative Americans are being told to “shut up and sit down” and it appears they are doing so. Will you?

    Are we to believe that not one idiot Obama voter voted for Romney by mistake? If I remember correctly, just a few short years ago we were told Democratic voters were so incompetent and illiterate that they made thousands of incorrect votes when they tired to vote for Gore. Now in just a few election cycles, not even one boneheaded Democrat made an error and voted for Romney. Really?

    No doubt you have heard all the pundits, even those supposedly on the right, declare that sure there may have been some voter fraud, but not enough to change the election.


    How do they know that unless they investigate? If voter fraud does not change elections, why do they do it? Are the just practicing for the day it may change elections? That day people is here and anyone with a half-brain knows it. …

    Not legally and not in the name of the GOP.

    And why can’t they? Because, and in these times of rage against an inept and spineless Republican party, they do not want what’s left of their dwindling party members to know that they agreed, in 1981, not to challenge any voter fraud. That decree, possibly the most stupid, selfish and idiotic thing, among many, that our GOP has done, has given over these last 31 years, carte blanche to the left to steal elections.”


    • I still disagree with their interpretation of that consent decree. All it says is that they can’t TARGET only districts with minority voters. So long as they do their anti-vote fraud activities across the board, then they’re allowed to true the vote. Besides which, the decree is specific to activities in the polls, as people try to vote. There’s nothing that I see about contesting OBVIOUSLY STOLEN ELECTIONS.

  4. Allen West gave up the ghost today. There will be no further recount. He said on FOX he didn’t want to ask his supporters to fund the recount. The demoncRATS won again over one of the best representatives that we had in Congress. This is infuriating to allow the cheaters to win. All of the early votes were not counted. He represented normal patriotic Americans better than anyone representing us now.

    We must realize and be ready for all of the tricks that the rats use to win. I wonder if Webster is still hospitalized? I hope she is fired.

  5. State by state total signatures

    White House Petitions…How are they doing?
    24 November 2012

    As MinuteMenNews has reported before, there are many petitions before the White House requesting secession, so we thought that we should update you on the status of each state’s petition. You’ll notice that some states have filed multiple petitions.


  6. FBI asked to probe Obama ‘vote-changing’ machines
    State lawmaker says she has concerns over election tampering

    Nov. 26 2012 Snips

    A state lawmaker in Maryland has asked the FBI to impound two voting machines used in the 2012 election to determine whether there was a malfunction or something nefarious going on.

    “I just feel it is my duty to try to get to the bottom of this,” state Delegate Kathryn Afzali told WND today. “We’re not making any accusations. The Board of Elections are good people. They have checks and balances … but we want to make sure everything is fair.”

    She said a number of people contacted her after the Nov. 6 election to report that they pressed a touch-screen button for GOP candidate Mitt Romney, but the vote registered for Barack Obama.
    She said that among those who contacted her with concerns were two officials, including a state lawmaker who personally experienced a vote machine changing his vote three times to the party whose agenda he opposed.

    The lawmaker told her that his computer background left him confident that the problem was beyond a technical glitch, and he insisted that the election judge take the machine out of service and lock it up.


    • Can we see some of those machines from the swing states impounded where there was 100% vote for Obama and not one single vote for Romney – over 19,000 votes in one precinct.?? Calling on other lawmakers to find out!

    • The problem is that it’s so simple to wipe the software and reinstall the “correct” software, or simply delete a subroutine that might have been there when the machine was “counting” but isn’t there now. Who would believe that at THIS point, the machines are as they were on election day?

      • “He said given that his constituent has experience with computers, the contention that he didn’t know how to use the machine seems a stretch.

        “I know how easy it would be to introduce a single spurious line of code,” Rothschild told WND, noting a programmer could easily instruct the machine to change the vote periodically, so a routine test wouldn’t reveal any problems.”

        EXACTLY. And they count on most people, and especially elections officials, being too computer illiterate to know just how EASY it is to do within the machine, where it’s nearly impossible to see (especially when the manufacturers refuse to turn over the software code).

  7. h/t Citizen Wells: http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2012/11/27/ohio-canvass-vote-certification-november-27-2012-provisional-ballots-counted-and-counted-correctly-hamilton-county-voter-fraud-double-votes-ohio-audit-trustworthy/#comments


    “Eighty-one voters in Hamilton County, Ohio, cast more than one ballot in the Nov. 6 election, officials said, bringing calls for investigation and prosecution.

    The disclosure came as the Hamilton County Board of Elections agreed to count nearly 15,000 provisional and absentee ballots which could potentially change the outcome of several local ballot measures, The Columbus Dispatch reported Wednesday.

    Election board staffers reported 63 voters cast both an early absentee ballot and a provisional ballot on Election Day, and 18 others voted twice on Nov. 6, typically by casting a regular vote in one precinct and a provisional ballot in another.

    The double votes would not have changed the outcome of any election in Hamilton County, which includes the city of Cincinnati and where 420,000 votes were cast, the newspaper said.

    “This is a dangerous situation,” elections board member and county Republican Chairman Alex Triantafilou said, noting 81 people “thought it appropriate to go and vote twice,” a situation meriting a possible referral to the county prosecutor’s office.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s