Don’t Wonder Where Obama Stands, Read his Words! (Open Thread)

©Bridgette@WTPOTUS 2012

“I will stand with them [Muslims] should the political

winds  shift in an ugly direction.”

Barack Obama, Page 261,  The Audacity of Hope

4

Al Qaeda Flag Flying High in 25 Countries

4

Citizens, Have the Winds Changed?

Any Questions?

*****

The State Department Can’t Read!

The Obama Administration Lies Again!

Egypt intelligence warns of attacks on Israel, US embassies
By JPOST.COM STAFF
9/11/2012 16:58

Egypt’s General Intelligence Service warned that a jihadi group is planning to launch terrorist attacks against the US and Israeli embassies in Cairo, according to a report Tuesday by Egypt Independent, citing a secret letter obtained by Al-Masry Al-Youm.

According to the report, the attack is being planned by Global Jihad, the group suspected of killing 16 Egyptian border guards in Sinai on August 5.

Al-Masry Al-Youm reportedly obtained a copy of the September 4 letter, sent to all Egyptian security sectors, warning that Sinai- and Gaza-based Global Jihad cells were planning attacks on the two embassies.

Egypt’s military is engaged in an ongoing campaign to root out Sinai-based terrorists.

Update:  I stand corrected on the quote that was changed  during my writing of it.   “them”  was left out and Muslim was to be put in brackets.  I apologize for the error.  I found the quote here  at Atlas Shrugs.

4
Advertisements

81 responses to “Don’t Wonder Where Obama Stands, Read his Words! (Open Thread)

  1. And that statement in itself explains the reason as too why his life is hidden, file’s closed, documents hidden.

    Barack Hussein Obama took Shahada

    https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/barack-hussein-obama-took-shahada/

  2. Excellent reminder! I screen shot it and posted on facebook. Such a simple, to-the-point reminder. In his own words……..

    • It is another great post by Bridgette! Simple and to the point. You said it! All Americans should know this particular quote of Barry’s BY HEART.

  3. Who do they think they are kidding?

    Donor-In-Chief Bill Maher hosts Fashion Week on HBO in August 2011

    Arrest that bald, beady-eyed, big-nosed bastard!

    Condemnation, we’ll wait…Hilllllarrrry, lookie, see!

    LIARS

    • Obama Took $1 Million From Liberal Anti-Islam Filmmaker
      September 15, 2012

      Liberal hypocrisy is sometimes so great, we really need a new word to describe it. Maybe “Obamacrite.”

      With the Islamic violence spreading globally this past week, the Obama Administration has hammered on one point it desperately wants everyone to believe, that it’s all caused by a cheap, homemade anti-Islamic video.

      That’s a transparent ruse, but let’s play along for a moment….
      ~
      And in our current guilt-by-association climate, anyone who took money from such an Islamophobic filmmaker would be equally guilty of insulting Islam.
      Well, if you go back a few years, there was a successful documentary called “Religulous” (supposed to rhyme with “ridiculous”) that criticized Christianity and Islam. DVDs of the film can be bought on Amazon, which is much more than can be said for the White House’s current scapegoat. The maker of the film is a prominent liberal and critic of conservatives, who donated $1 million to a certain big-mouthed liberal politician. The filmmaker is Bill Maher, and the politician is none other than King Obama.

      So the president who is currently pushing the theory that a little film insulting Islam drives the terrorists who are rising up around the world is in fact benefiting from a huge donation from the maker of a popular film that mocks Islam.

      Wonder when Obama will return that donation and start a federal manhunt for Bill Maher?

      http://godfatherpolitics.com/7065/obama-took-1-million-from-liberal-anti-islam-filmmaker/

  4. The World is on fire!

    Russia: tens of thousands turn out for anti-Putin rally
    Peaceful demonstration opposing presidency of Vladimir Putin is first major protest to take place in three months
    Saturday 15 September 2012 20.32 EDT

    The first major protest against Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, after a summer lull drew tens of thousands of people in Moscow, in a show of defiance that opposition sentiment remains strong despite Kremlin efforts to muzzle dissent.
    ~
    “We have to defend our rights, which we were deprived of, the right to have elections. We’re deprived of honest elections and an honest government,” opposition activist Alexander Shcherbakov said. “I’m coming to show that and to demonstrate that the people are opposed. I’m opposed to illegitimate government and illegitimate elections.”

    Leftists, liberals and nationalists mixed with students, teachers, gay activists and others on the capital’s tree-lined boulevards during Saturday’s rally, chanting “Russia without Putin!” and “We are the power here!” The protest remained peaceful as about 7,000 police officers stood guard along the route of the march, and a police helicopter hovered overhead.

    Putin has taken a tougher course against the opposition since his inauguration in May with a series of new repressive laws, arrests and interrogation of activists. In August, a court handed two-year prison sentences to three members of the punk band Pussy Riot for performing an anti-Putin song inside Moscow’s main cathedral.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/16/russia-anti-putin-protest-moscow

  5. Donor-In-Chief calls Muslamic woman a slut> Atlantic City 2009

    • Will that earn him a visit from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, asking him to STFU lest he “offend” even more Muslims who will riot even more?

    • The Feds should arrive to take him into custody if we can get it publicized!

      As Papoose said…………”Hillary, oh Hillary” We need some absolute condemnation here! We know the government had nothing to do with it, but he should be investigated. He has no right to free speech or liberty.

      • Sandra Fluke: SIC HIM!

        He absolutely should be investigated, just like that so-called filmmaker. I saw a TV report about the government going after that guy. They actually tried to link him to other Copts who happen to write about and speak out truthfully against the Muslim plan to take over the world. One guy was seen shouting, “Wake up, AMERICA!”

        They presented it AS IF these guys don’t have the right to speak. As if somehow, by speaking, they’re committing a crime. As if somehow, because what they say is similar to what that film allegedly says, these other guys are connected to the film and therefore share the blame for the riots, murder, destruction going on in the Middle East. I do believe it’s some kind of bizarre plan to drum up support for censoring the Internet and getting the US to agree to that crap sandwich about governments all around the world forbidding insults to “religion”.

        EVEN that filmmaker (if he made a film) is NOT responsible for these insane clowns in the Middle East. They’re solely responsible for their own actions.

        Can you believe the “Muslim on the street” is saying that the filmmaker should be executed for insulting their prophet?

        Will the citizens of the UK riot and attack the French embassy because a French photographer offended the Duchess of Cambridge by publicizing those pictures of her topless?

        France can deny it all they want, but they MUST be complicit in that offense against the Duchess. Will they arrest the photographer and see to it that he’s executed? Actually, it was an offense against ALL women, so maybe we’ll soon see women rioting all over the world, until France apologizes and makes amends.

  6. Anyone heard of the Advancement Project? Is this another Soros operation? I thought felons lost their vote permanently.

    Convicted Felons to Vote In November Thanks to Obama Supporters
    September 15, 2012 snips

    Now the Advancement Project has been pressuring Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell and Secretary of State Janet Kelly into making the effort to reinstate the right to vote to convicted felons in their state. They claim to be a ‘multi-racial civil rights organization’ started in 1999. The leaders of the organization have contributed tens of thousands of dollars to the Democratic National Committee and to Obama’s campaign. So it is no wonder they are trying to get voting rights for felons so they can vote for Obama.

    According to Advancement Project’s website: “A spokesperson with the Governor’s office says to date he has restored the right to vote for more than 3,500 felons. … “In recent years he says former Gov. Tim Kaine restored rights to 4,402 felons.

    http://godfatherpolitics.com/7061/convicted-felons-to-vote-in-november-thanks-to-obama-supporters/

    • It’s a state by state thing, which is odd. http://felonvoting.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=286 The theory must be that it’s part of their punishment and they have to prove they’re rehabilitated.

      • I was taught old school by Democrat nun, no less. This is what I was taught. When you are in prison you do not vote because you are not FREE. If not FREE, you are not an American Citizen. Therefore, your citizenship is in a “suspended state”. Real simple, huh? So simple I have never forgot it and never wanted to give up my citizenship by doing ‘time’!

        • if a convicted felon, you have broken the social compact by engaging in activity which the public at large (through the legislature) deems so egregious it deserves incarceration and you don’t then deserve to contribute to the legislation of those laws.
          you have also been through the courts and found by a competent court to be guilty of the felony so it is not a taking of liberty “without due process of law”. you have had your due process by going through courts and being able to present your case, call your witnesses, etc.
          it is determined at the state level because it is the state which most often deals with criminal law and it is the state which governs most of the voting laws.
          the state is closer to the people and best reflects what the people believe is appropriate taking of liberty in response to felony convictions.
          in a nutshell

    • I’m with you; I also thought that they lost their right to vote permanently. I’m amazed at how the different states deal with it. IMHO, they should lose it permanently.

    • Wiki has two sentences. No information as to how they are funded – there is a donation button on the site. Social justice is mentioned. There are several lawyers on the board.

      Advancement Project is a multi-racial civil rights organization. Founded by a team of veteran civil rights lawyers in 1999.
      http://www.advancementproject.org/

      Board of Directors [I don’t recognize the others]
      Harry Belafonte – confidant of Martin Luther King, Jr.?
      Joe Alvarez – labor unions
      http://www.advancementproject.org/people/entry/joe-alvarez

      http://www.advancementproject.org/people/c/board-of-directors

    • ADVANCEMENT PROJECT (AP) NUMBERS from 2009

      Views America as a nation rife with racism and discrimination against nonwhites
      Works to “dismantle structural barriers to inclusion, secure racial equity, and expand opportunity for all”
      Seeks to influence lawmakers and opinion-shapers

      Net assets in 2009: $3,009,386
      Contributions and grants received in 2009: $5,218,389

      A key funder of AP National is George Soros’s Open Society Institute, which in 2009 alone gave $500,000 to the organization.

      http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7680

      • Look under any rock and you will find George Soros!

        This is like the Muslim mindset. The white devil made them do it. If they’re in prison, it’s not because they committed crimes; it’s because of white racism. If they lost the right to vote, even for a short time, it’s not because they gave it up freely when they committed felonies. No, it’s because of white racism. If there are disproportionate numbers of “people of color” in prison, it’s not because they committed the crimes that landed them there. No, it’s because of white racism. They try to use these false statistics to “prove” the racism. All those black guys in prison are there just because the cops and the justice system are racist. It’s not because, for example, some guy blew away another BLACK guy in a gang battle. Nope! Racism. Structural racism.

  7. We need to remember this term: “constructive deceits”.

    That’s what it’s called when guys like Putin AND BARRY stage flattering photo ops or incidents or make up narratives about themselves or their biographies.
    http://www.npr.org/2012/09/15/161169007/putin-turns-photo-ops-into-soviet-style-agitprop

    “Russian President Vladimir Putin told a Russian journalist that many of his most picturesque media appearances — shooting a tranquilizer dart into a tiger who appeared about to pounce; tagging a wounded snow leopard; and, just this week, wearing a feathery white suit to pilot a glider to guide a group of cranes south for the winter — were staged.

    “Of course there are excesses,” he told Masha Gessen in Bolshoi Gorod magazine. But they were constructive deceits, he said, because they called attention to endangered wildlife. …

    The president also confirmed that a stunt last year, in which he appeared to dive to the bottom of the Black Sea and discover ancient Greek artifacts, had been staged. “Well of course they were planted!” he said. “Why did I dive? Not to show my gills off, but to make sure people learn history. Of course it was a set up.” …

    There was a joke in the old Soviet Union about the two state-run Moscow newspapers, Pravda (truth) and Izvestia (news). There is no truth in news, Russians used to say to each other, and there is no news in truth.

    There are many who charge Mr. Putin’s state-run media may have restored those times, when Russians don’t turn to the news for news so much as clues to what people in power expect them to think.

    At least somebody confronts Putin and when confronted, he ADMITS it. Isn’t is strange that Barry’s methods are just like former KGB SOVIET RUSSIAN PUTIN? All we read in OUR STATE MEDIA IS WHAT BARRY EXPECTS US TO THINK OR BELIEVE.

  8. ““I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

    That quote is incorrect!

    http://www.theobamafile.com/_Islam/ObamaIslamEarlyYears.htm#Protective

    • Thanks for telling me. Somehow when I copied it, the “them” was dropped and Muslim was to be in brackets. I made the correction and apologize to our readers.
      This is where is it from:

      Obama Refused Cardinal’s Prayers at DNC but Lists Muslim Jumah Prayers as “official function”
      Sunday, August 26, 2012

      “I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” Barack Hussein Obama, page 261, The Audacity of Hope

      Last week I posted about the Jumah jihad at the DNC, an event led by an imam who urged the overthrow of the “filthy” U.S. government and who was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the World Trade center bombings. Obama’s DNC lists the assembly as an “official function.” The group is hardly “mainstream,” being represented by Siraj Wahhaj, who will be the “Grand Imam” for the gathering.

      Wahhaj and the co-leader of the Charlotte event, Jibril Hough, are both heavily involved in the separatist American Islamist movement. Many of the participants in the “Jumah at the DNC” will most likely represent radical networks that have long-time, but little-known, operations in the Charlotte region.

      Looks like Obama is engaging in his own holy war. At a speech in 1995, Siraj Wahhaj informed the world that it was his “duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran.”

      But the Cardinal is not welcome.

      http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/obama-refused-cardinals-prayers-at-dnc-but-lists-muslim-jumah-prayers-as-official-function.html

  9. The most serious and the most unreported islamic attack:

    debka:

    Al Qaeda-led Salafis hit three Egyptian Sinai bases, down Egyptian chopper
    DEBKAfile Special Report September 16, 2012, 6:04 PM (GMT+02:00)
    Tags: Al Qaeda Salafis Sinai Bedouin Egypt MFO US
    Al Qaeda-led Bedouin fighters in Sinai

    Salafi Bedouin and al Qaeda bands Sunday, Sept 16, expanded their Sinai offensive to three Egyptian bases along a 70-kilometer front three days after they raided the US-led Multinational Force base south of El Arish in northern Sinai and hoisted the black Islamist flag. debkafile’s military sources report that at dawn, a small group managed to creep up to the northern Sinai Egyptian command center in al Arish and plant a large bomb against its walls. Because of the total Egyptian blackout on the episode, there is no information on casualties or damage.

    The explosion was followed by a horde of heavily armed gunmen firing rocket grenades and heavy machine guns swooping on the center and seizing the rooftops of surrounding buildings to pin down the Egyptian commanders inside the compound. By the end of the day, the Salafi-al Qaeda gangs were in control of El Arish, the key town of northern Sinai.
    At a distance of 40 kilometers, a fierce battle erupted at another site, Sheikh Zuwaid, 3 kilometers from the MFO’s northern base which was attacked Friday. The raiders captured the local school and took dozens of children hostage. Using them as human shields, the terrorists advanced on the local police station shooting anti-tank rockets, rocket grenades, automatic weapons and fire bombs.
    To repel this attack, the Egyptian army deployed combat helicopters which struck the invaders with missiles and heavy machine guns. One chopper was reported shot down. Due to the Egyptian news blackout, there is no word on the fate of the children, the helicopter crew or whether it was downed by an anti-air rocket or machine gun fire,

    The Salafi-al Qaeda terrorists next turned to the Egyptian special forces base at Rafah abutting the Gaza Strip and just across the Israeli border. This is the same base which Salafi Bedouin and al Qaeda gunmen attacked on Aug. 5 killing 16 Egyptian troops and crashing through the frontier barrier into Israel.

    debkafile’s military sources report that the broad al Qaeda-led offensive Sunday marks a major and dangerous escalation in the Islamist terrorist coalition’s war plans for Sinai. It carried four messages:

    1. It is a military force to be reckoned: The jihadi terrorists first displayed their military prowess on Aug. 5, when they took on two armies at once. Sunday, they attacked three military targets along a 70-kilometer front, a feat which even the Afghan Taliban has not mastered.
    2. This feat puts the Sinai Army of Islam at the forefront of the violent Islamist protest against the United States sweeping across the Middle East and Asia over a film mocking the Prophet Muhammad. Because it is beyond the horizon of international attention and the Western media, Washington, Cairo and Jerusalem have been able to keep its true impact under wraps.
    3. More than 1,000 MFO peacemakers including hundreds of American officers have been under Salafi-Al Qaeda-Bedouin siege for three days since their Al Ghora base was raided Friday. They have a fleet of helicopters and small reconnaissance aircraft with American crews, but they don’t dare take off because it is feared that al Qaeda gunmen will shoot them down with FIM-92 Stinger anti-air missiles smuggled into Sinai from Libya.

    SNIP

    You would think our military would help?
    Not under the mozzy in chief

  10. Funny headline! John is answering his emails that are always interesting and he calls the obots, Comrade.

    Democrats Lock Up Uterus Vote
    John Ransom September 16.

    Longball38884 wrote: Won’t it be great when the department of pregnancy can tie down every woman and force her to have her monthly ultra sound to PROVE she’s not even thinking of having an abortion? -Another Excuse from Both Ways Barack

    Dear Comrade Oddball,

    There is only one party dumb enough to start a Department of Pregnancy and it’s not the GOP. How exactly would an “ultrasound” prove what a woman is thinking? Like most liberals, I think you are confused a bit by a woman’s biology. That part doesn’t do a woman’s thinking for her. I know liberals tend to think that women are just uteruses who vote, but, again, you are wrong.
    Talk about denigrating women.

    The bigger point is, and it’s most telling, is that in an article detailing the economic war that Obama is waging on everyone, including women, you are desperate to change the subject from the economy and jobs to something, anything, else.

    http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2012/09/16/democrats_lock_up_uterus_vote

  11. Those Pesky ID laws…Punative = Inflicting or intended as punishment! Justices to make a decision soon.

    Karen Heller: Counting the votes … in court
    Justices’ every word in the photo ID case is seen through an election lens.
    Sun, Sep. 16, 2012 Snips

    How fitting that the state Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday on Pennsylvania’s punitive voter ID law in Philadelphia, and how striking that the city was barely mentioned during oral arguments, except as the birthplace of our democracy and the nation’s oldest appellate court.

    Because, make no mistake, though lawyers literally talked geographic circles around the commonwealth’s largest city – mentioning rural counties without PennDot offices and others with limited hours – this law disenfranchises the poor, young, elderly, and people of color of Philadelphia, discouraging Obama voters from four years ago from returning to the polls in November. My concern is the law will deter people from even trying to vote.

    The law is the Republican-controlled legislature’s attempt to make Philadelphia irrelevant on Election Day, and its swift passage and enforcement in a presidential election year is a purely cynical and political move.

    http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/karen_heller/20120916_Karen_Heller__Counting_the_votes_____in_court.html

    • So there will be lots of disenfranchised voters in PA! How do those people get their welfare checks if they don’t have ID? How do they live in Section 8 housing, or get food stamps? Is it not required in PA? Such hooey from the democrats – such a blatant lie – anyone with a lick of sense would call the Democrat’s bluff on this (especially Eric Holder) that the poor can’t vote because they don’t have ID. Democrats want to keep up their election fraud and voter ID makes it more difficult for them to do so. We know we won’t see Snoopy or Donald Duck on photo ID’s. (I don’t know if that is what the PA law states – to have photo ID’s or just ID’s without a photo.)

      • even 1 is one too many

        Like a lot of places, more people vote than are signed in. i have read that there have been some elections across the country that have more votes than registered voters.

        http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/166/82033.html

        Opposition to photo ID is absurd on its face ~ and like all dark clouds, the silver lining reveals the cheaters by name. at least we know who the fraudsters are… this minority crap is racist, too.

  12. I am more then just lady parts 😯

  13. The Attacks on the USA Continue in the Middle East… The Latest in Yemen and Iran… ck out this videos and pics.

    http://resistance.ning.com/forum/topic/show?id=2600775%3ATopic%3A5921774&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_topic

    Does all this make you ill????

    • If I had been in that one car I would have run over those people that were attacking me. I hope the person inside survived. Sickening. Who would put Marilyn Monroe on the flag? That is strange.I guess she represents another American icon in their eyes.

  14. That movie..all the fuss/deaths are over… I heard it’s because HOLLYWOOD is MAD… WHY? It’s soon too RELEASED…. ONE also!

  15. via-Drudge

    Armada of British naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike

    An armada of US and British naval power is massing in the Persian Gulf in the belief that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s covert nuclear weapons programme.

    15 Sep 2012

    Battleships, aircraft carriers, minesweepers and submarines from 25 nations are converging on the strategically important Strait of Hormuz in an unprecedented show of force as Israel and Iran move towards the brink of war.

    Western leaders are convinced that Iran will retaliate to any attack by attempting to mine or blockade the shipping lane through which passes around 18 million barrels of oil every day, approximately 35 per cent of the world’s petroleum traded by sea. A blockade would have a catastrophic effect on the fragile economies of Britain, Europe the United States and Japan, all of which rely heavily on oil and gas supplies from the Gulf. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most congested international waterways. It is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and is bordered by the Iranian coast to the north and the United Arab Emirates to the south.

    In preparation for any pre-emptive or retaliatory action by Iran, warships from more than 25 countries, including the United States, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, will today begin an annual 12-day exercise.

    Many within the Obama administration believe that Israel will launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities before the US presidential elections, an act which would signal the failure of one of Washington’s key foreign policy objectives.Both Downing Street and Washington hope that the show of force will demonstrate to Iran that Nato and the West will not allow President
    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian leader, to develop a nuclear armoury or close Hormuz.

    Sir John Sawers, the head of MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service, reportedly met the Israeli prime minister and Ehud Barak, his defence secretary, two weeks ago in an attempt to avert military action against Iran.

    But just last week Mr Netanyahu signalled that time for a negotiated settlement was running out when he said: “The world tells Israel ‘Wait, there’s still time.’ And I say, ‘Wait for what? Wait until when? [exactly!]

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/9545597/Armada-of-British-naval-power-massing-in-the-Gulf-as-Israel-prepares-an-Iran-strike.html

    • So we are notifying Iran of what they can expect? I don’t understand war games. I thought part of the attack is to keep their actions secret. Why do they want to let the enemy know their intentions? A scare tactic, perhaps. If Israel strikes, I pray for the Israelis if Obama doesn’t back them up, and I think he has given every indication that he won’t. He has procrastinated through the Middle East Crisis, and this occasion would be no different. We know Israel won’t be telling Obama what or when since in Obamaland they can’t keep secrets.

      Twenty five – 25 – Nations are sending ships! This is not looking good.
      Frightening that all of this is going on now.

      • With the technology of satellite Iran would have known at the first movments anyway. But you are right, remember back in the day’s of our childhood information was never released until after the fact?

        I’m actually glad too see Israeli taking a stand. Like Netanyahu said ‘Wait for what? Wait until when” wait until it’s too late and Iran strikes first?

        Of course Obama won’t back Israeli up, he’s already said as much. He doesn’t want to upset Pakistan, disgusting. Israeli has always been an ally too the U.S.

  16. Forensic profiler: Meet Obama – the ‘sandman’
    Eminent psychiatrist reveals mysterious code in which America’s leader speaks
    Sept. 15, 2012 snips

    WASHINGTON – An eminent psychiatrist and forensic profiler suggests Barack Obama is “confessing” to the American people who he is and what he wants to do to the country, but most citizens are just not trained to decode his messages. Dr. Andrew G. Hodges, in his new book “The Obama Confessions,” makes the case that, because of the hurts he experienced in his young life, Obama has overcompensated with a sophisticated communication system that can be understood by reading between the lines of what he says.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/forensic-profiler-meet-obama-the-sandman/?cat_orig=us

    • I thought he was speaking in Socialist or Alinsky codes… We are now trained to watch his actions and dismiss his words. We have often said if Obama says it, its a lie and to look at the opposite. Here it is in black and white from a psychiatrist: ” It’s part of a pattern in his speech of denying the truth, saying the opposite of what he means. ” I guess it means he is a sophisticated liar, and here I thought he was an ordinary psychopathic liar.

      The analysis only works if he knows the real background of Obama, and we aren’t sure who he is or if he is the same person found in some records.

      • Your last sentence is true. Sometimes I wonder about these writers who persist in talking AS IF BHO Sr. is really his father. But whoever his father was, it’s apparent that he was absent for most of Barry’s life.

    • I didn’t read it yet but my first impression was “Duh!” We all here noticed that years ago. Shows you what common sense and acute perception can do!

  17. Netanyahu Makes Appeal To US Voters Over Iran
    Sept 16, 2012

    WASHINGTON – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a direct appeal to American voters on Sunday to elect a president willing to draw a “red line” with Iran, comparing Tehran’s nuclear program to Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and reminding Americans of the devastating repercussions of failed intelligence.

    His remarks were an impassioned election-season plea from a world leader who insists he doesn’t want to insert himself into U.S. politics and hasn’t endorsed either candidate. But visibly frustrated by U.S. policy under President Barack Obama, the hawkish Israeli leader took advantage of the week’s focus on unrest across the Muslim world and America’s time-honored tradition of the Sunday television talk shows to appeal to Americans headed to the polls in less than two months.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/16/netanyahu-iran-guided-by-leadership-fanaticism/

    David Gregory was disrespectful towards Netanyahu. He raised his voice and talked over the Prime Minister.

    Full Interview: Prime Minister Netanyahu on Meet the Press

    http://www.therightscoop.com/full-interview-prime-minister-netanyahu-on-meet-the-press/

  18. UNREAL… Obama Invites Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood President to Meet Next Week…

    September 16, 2012

    Unbelievable!… Barack Obama invited Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Mohammad Morsi to meet with him in New York next week.

    But, not Netanyahu.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lectured Barack Obama in the Oval Office on the dangers facing the Jews back in May 2011.

    But… Barack Obama won’t meet with Israeli leader Netanyahu over Iran now. He’s going to be campaigning and on Letterman. Reuters reported: The White House has rejected a request by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to meet President Barack Obama in the United States this month, an Israeli official said on Tuesday, after a row erupted between the allies over Iran’s nuclear programme.

    An Israeli official told Reuters on condition of anonymity that Netanyahu’s aides had asked for a meeting when he visits the United Nations this month, and “the White House has got back to us and said it appears a meeting is not possible. It said that the president’s schedule will not permit that”.

    Netanyahu has met with Obama on all the Israeli leader’s U.S. trips since 2009.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/09/unreal-obama-invites-muslim-brotherhood-egyptian-leader-to-meet-next-week-refuses-to-meet-netanyahu/?ref=nf

  19. But yet…

    The White House hands Iran’s Ahmadinejad a global megaphone
    September 11, 2012

    Just a few days after the anniversary of the September 11 terror attacks, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will travel to New York City. Once he arrives he will be handed a platform to incite violence and hostility from the center of the UN universe, just a few miles from Ground Zero.

    This is a man who openly advocates genocide, brazenly endeavors to commit terrorist attacks on American soil, kills and kidnaps Americans abroad, brutalizes his own people, sponsors terrorism around the world, and is on the verge of acquiring a nuclear bomb.

    Today, on 9/11, we need to ask why. Why is he being given this global megaphone?

    In September of 2010 Ahmadinejad used the podium of the United Nations General Assembly to make this claim about the 9/11 terror attacks: “some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy…”

    In September of 2011 he complained that “colonial powers…threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust.”

    It is a moral outrage that the Obama administration is facilitating Ahmadinejad’s return to the United States in September of 2012.

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/11/white-house-hands-iran-ahmadinejad-global-megaphone/#ixzz26hr1MHgN

  20. Your so right Miri, on all accounts too whats really happening. But I think most of us that have been here researching the last four years have known.

    Oh yeah! What a deal!

    “the Islamic movement will undertake not to attack the U.S. or the West in exchange for an end to Western interference in the affairs of the Islamic countries and Western agreement to the establishment of an Islamic state ruled by Shari’a law in every country in which the majority of Muslims have expressed widespread support for it.”

    Are you kidding me?!!! (comment @ FR – pretty much explains this)

    Muhammad Al-Zawahiri, Brother Of Al-Qaeda Leader, Proposes 10-Year ‘Hudna’ To The West

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2932097/posts?q=1&;page=1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudna

  21. http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/meast/egypt-us-embassy-protests/index.html

    Some of the Egyptians were PAID to “protest”, but yet that wasn’t a planned, organized thing, was it? Who paid these guys? Egypt isn’t telling, but I bet Barry knows.

  22. http://cnsnews.com/blog/dan-gainor/occupy-hit-40-corporate-targets-anniversary-protests-disguised-business-attire

    Occupy Poopstockers are back in NY and Glenn Beck says, wonder of wonders, they’re flying the SAME BLACK FLAG that the “protestors” in Libya and Egypt are flying. Remember, too, that the “clowns” in the Middle East are wearing the same Guy Fawkes masks that the Poopstockers do. Coincidink? I think not.

    • Where would they get the black Islamic flag to fly? Who is manufacturing them and sending them to the US? Recall that that ACORN and unions went international…that is how this is spreading. Wade Rathke is the head of it if I recall. We researched this 3 years ago and wondered what they were up to..well, I think we are seeing their “good” works coming to fruition – especially with the tip off that the protesters are getting paid leads me to suspect ACORN and of course, Soros.

      Send a tip to Glenn to check it out. Also, Glenn has come back to normal television IF you have DISH…which I don’t.

    • Black clouds and black flags over Obama
      Exclusive: Joel Richardson explains Islamic symbol appearing amid global riots
      Sept. 17 Snips

      It was in 2004, when American businessman Nicholas Berg’s brutal execution by beheading was widely shown all over the Internet, that most Americans caught their first glimpse of the black flag of Islam. Hung on the wall behind Berg and his murderous executioners was a black banner with Arabic writing in white. Since the murder of Nicholas Berg, in numerous al-Qaida videos posted online, the same black flag has been observed hanging prominently behind the speaker.And now the same black flag is proudly flying high over the U.S. Embassy in Tunisia and is waving across the world. Welcome to Obama’s so-called “Arab Spring.”

      Over the past few days, the black flag has been observed amidst the protests and riots in Egypt, Libya, Sudan, Nigeria, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Kuwait, Bahrain, Iran, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Indonesia, India, Turkey, Jerusalem, Gaza and even Germany, Australia and England. Across the world, Muslims of every race, tribe and nation are marching under the same black banner.
      ~
      Islam’s black flag is most often emblazoned with white Arabic writing. The phrase in Arabic, lā ʾilāha ʾillà l-Lāh, Muḥammadur rasūlu l-Lāh translates into English as, “There is no god but God, Muhammad is the messenger of God.” This is the creed and very heart of Islamic theology. This phrase is known as the “Shahada.” The Shahada affirms not only the exclusive and singular claim to deity of Allah, the god of Islam, but also the supreme role of Muhammad as the final messenger of this god to mankind. If one wishes to convert to Islam, this is the phrase that one must recite. When every Muslim child is born, the first phrase they will hear are these words whispered into his ears by his father.

      http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/black-clouds-and-black-flags-over-obama/

  23. This ad is great! Should be frightening even to Bots.

    Obama chastised: Come clean on Islam!

    He sent billions to Egypt’s radical new government. Military and financial aid to Libyan rebels who killed American diplomats. Invited the Muslim Brotherhood to the White House. Voters may soon have even more reason to ask Barack Obama why his policies have aided the Muslim Brotherhood.

    An organization called Let Freedom Ring is working to buy air time for a new commercial highlighting both the Brotherhood’s radical agenda and Obama’s support for the terror-tied organization.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/ad-asks-obama-to-explain-muslim-connection/

  24. http://jstsay.in/0006SU
    on mike huckabee’s today….SAD but true…. shall we sing along?

  25. More of HOW and WHY we GOT HERE…..

  26. Happy Birthday United States of America Constitution!
    September 17, 1787

    Where would WTP be without you?
    At least, WTP know where we are since you’ve been ignored.

    • bwahahahhhahahaaa

      so true. so easy to read. what a fraudster.

      ~ btw
      Citizen WElls is doing a wonderful job reporting on the Chicago thug and his muslamic cronies.

  27. Iranian Regime Threatens to Sue Obama Using New UN Blasphemy Law He Signed
    September 16, 2012

    In December the Obama Administration pushed a UN resolution that banned criticism of Islam.

    The Obama Administration helped the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) push through their resolution condemning the stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of people based on religion. Team Obama led the way for the resolution to pass through the General Assembly.

    Now the Iranian Regime is threatening to sue Barack Obama using that same blasphemy law. Press TV reported:

    A senior Iranian official says US President Barack Obama could face legal action in connection with the production of an anti-Islam movie by an American Jew.

    “A complaint could be filed with US courts against Obama for his violation of articles 18 and 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) calling for respect of faiths,” Javad Mohammadi, the deputy head of the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution (SCCR), said on Sunday.

    “Article 18 and 27 of the ICCPR, adopted by the United Nation, stipulate that the religion and the rights of the minorities should be respected,” Mohammadi said.

    The US government is a signatory to this covenant and has to respect it. Therefore, an individual or an NGO (non-governmental organization) can file a lawsuit against the president of the country for breach of the covenant, he added.

    Mohammadi heaped praise on the Muslims for their massive protests against the movie, noting “Protest against insults to religious sanctities should not be limited to time, place and customary reactions and we should undertake legal measures.”

    Don’t look at us, Barack. We tried to warn you.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/09/iranian-regime-threatens-to-sue-obama-using-new-un-blasphemy-laws-he-signed/

    • What international court will hear these charges? What are the penalties? I’d like him charged in any court at this time for anything! Treason comes to mind as my first choice.

      Did we know that this was signed? I remember reading about it but didn’t know we pushed it or signed it. My memory is cloudy on this issue. The Obama administration has tried to do so many outrageous things that it is hard to keep track of everything.

      In third world countries the government controls everything, so in their eyes, this film was produced by the US government not by an individual. An individual is not recognized.

      • I remember posting stories about the so-called meetings Hillary had about HOW to implement it. But at that time, I don’t recall reading that it had been passed, or whatever they want to call it.

        http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/hillary_cheered_broadways_book_of_mormon_condemns_innocence_of_muslims.html The inimitable Jack Cashill again.

        “On Thursday of last week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the video project Innocence of Muslims, the one that may or may not have provoked riots worldwide, “disgusting and reprehensible.”

        Although Clinton could have seen no more than a 13-minute trailer for the video, she condemned it in no uncertain terms: “Let me state very clearly — and I hope it is obvious — the United States government had nothing to do with this video. We absolutely reject its content and message.”

        One would think that Clinton might have had a similar reaction to a musical comedy by the name of The Book of Mormon, a satirical, scandalously potty-mouthed riff on the Mormon religion. What follows is one of the show’s printable lyrics, this from the song “All-American Prophet.”

        You all know the Bible

        Is made of Testaments old and new.

        You’ve been told it’s just those two parts,

        Or only one, if you’re a Jew.

        But what if I were to tell you

        There’s a FRESH third part out there?

        That was found by a HIP new prophet

        Who had a little…

        Donny Osmond flair.

        Apparently, Secretary Clinton has flexible standards. The Associated Press reported soon after The Book of Mormon’s opening that “[t]he show has been greeted not by protests but rhapsodic reviews and standing ovations from crowds that have included celebrities as diverse as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, actor Jack Nicholson and composer Stephen Sondheim.” Indeed, the show has been the biggest hit on Broadway these past two seasons, winning nine Tony Awards along the way.

        True, when the show premiered in 2011, the media were shocked. NPR accurately called it “blasphemous.” The Washington Post called it “acidic.” The New York Times called it “more foul-mouthed than David Mamet on a blue streak.”

        But the media did not stop there — not at all. In context, NPR called The Book of Mormon “blasphemous, hilarious and oddly endearing.” The Post called the show “one of the most joyously acidic bundles Broadway has unwrapped in years.” And the Times called it, foul-mouthed or not, “a newborn, old-fashioned, pleasure-giving musical.”

        Although some likely found The Book of Mormon as “offensive and reprehensible and disgusting” as White House spokesman Jay Carney found Innocence of Muslims, the Obama administration chose not to denounce it. Nor could I find any protest from Carney when his former employer, TIME Magazine, praised The Book of Mormon as “bright and enjoyable, and good enough to make even a grumpy critic’s 10 Best list.””

        Do read the rest of this excellent article at American Thinker.

        Will Obama and Hillary call for the criminalization of these actors, producers, writers? Will they “investigate” and send a cadre of brown-shirted cops to THEIR homes in the dead of night, to frog-march the producers out of their homes and down to the police station, voluntarily, of course? Will they pore through their tax returns, looking for any excuse to haul them in? Will they follow them and if they make an illegal right turn on red, haul them in? Will Mormons RIOT and attack embassies and will Mormon leaders call for vengeance and the deaths of all involved in this so-called “comedy”?

        btw, do you think it’s a coincidence that this “comedy” is out now? My local paper did a big story about Mormons over the weekend, acting as if they were only informing readers about the religion. I read somewhere that Barry was saving the “Mormon issue” until closer to the election. The story I read made sure to quote others who called Mormonism a “cult”. Gee, how nice of them to include that.

        Have you EVER read ANY truth about the CULT OF ISLAM? Would any newspaper print the word “cult” in a story about Islam? Can you fathom a Broadway comedy that ridicules and makes fun of Islam?

        • I have to provide the conclusion:

          According to TPM, a leftist blog, Mitt Romney has been “echoing [the] White House position” on Innocence of Muslims. “The idea of using something that some people consider sacred and then parading that out a negative way is simply inappropriate and wrong,” Romney said. “And I wish people wouldn’t do it.” But this is hardly an echo. Wishing people would stop is not quite the same as dispatching the FBI.

          The real difference, though, between Romney’s response and the White House’s, certainly the difference between his and Hillary’s, is that he could and would have said the very same thing about The Book of Mormon.”

    • A good article on the issue from a couple of years back:
      h/t FR

      Troubling Signals On Free Speech
      In his eagerness to please international opinion, President Obama has taken a small but significant step toward censoring free speech.

      By Stuart Taylor Jr.
      Updated: January 26, 2012
      October 31, 2009

      It was nice to hear Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton say on October 26, “I strongly disagree” with Islamic countries seeking to censor free speech worldwide by making defamation of religion a crime under international law.

      But watch what the Obama administration does, not just what it says. I’m not talking about its attacks on Fox News. I’m talking about a little-publicized October 2 resolution in which Clinton’s own State Department joined Islamic nations in adopting language all-too-friendly to censoring speech that some religions and races find offensive.

      The ambiguously worded United Nations Human Rights Council resolution could plausibly be read as encouraging or even obliging the U.S. to make it a crime to engage in hate speech, or, perhaps, in mere “negative racial and religious stereotyping.” This despite decades of First Amendment case law protecting such speech.

      To be sure, the provisions to which I refer were a compromise, stopping short of the flat ban on defamation of religion sought by Islamic nations, and they could also be construed more narrowly and innocuously. It all depends on who does the construing.

      Is it “negative stereotyping” to say that the world’s most dangerous terrorists are Islamists, for example? Many would say yes.

      I sketch below how the resolution could be construed to require prosecuting some offensive speech and how it could be used in the long run to change the meaning of our Constitution and laws, based on doctrines developed by legal academics including Obama appointee Harold Koh, the State Department’s top lawyer.

      Law — especially international law — evolves below the radar, in small moves largely ignored by the mainstream media. Although international resolutions have traditionally not been seen as binding law, the Obama
      administration is seeded with left-liberal thinkers who have long sought to spin what some call “transnational” law out of such stuff, and who have smiled on efforts to punish speech that is offensive to favored racial, religious, and other groups.

      Such attitudes may help explain the administration’s decision to join the U.N. Human Rights Council in the first place. Obama reversed a Bush administration policy of shunning this deeply politicized body, which counts as members several flagrant human-rights abusers and which is preoccupied with attacking Israel.

      The council’s October 2 resolution is ostensibly an endorsement of “freedom of opinion and expression,” which seems ironic, given the track records of such members as China, Cuba, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

      But the real problem is a provision, which the U.S. championed jointly with Egypt, exuding hostility to free expression.

      Cont’s at link
      http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/troubling-signals-on-free-speech-20091031

      • Since when is a UN resolution a “law”? I keep reading Iran is behind all the upheaval. Maybe why V. Jarrett decide on a vacation with all the secret service protection? I’m sure she had no advance information….riiiight!

        • Hadn’t thought of that..vacationing at Martha’s Vineyard. Did she leave to help Obama make some decisions at the critical moment or did she give orders by phone?

          Good question, I don’t know under what authority the UN can do anything. It is being governed by the most despicable characters alive, and most are enemies of the U.S. It is not a treaty and doesn’t anything including a resolution that goes to the UN have to have Congress approval? Do we know what the Obama administration has done without our knowledge?

    • No member state called for a recorded vote on the text, which was as a result adopted “by consensus.” [When the building was empty? Did Hillary vote “present” or “absent”?]

      The resolution, an initiative of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), is based on one passed by the U.N.’s Human Rights Council in Geneva last spring. The State Department last week hosted a meeting to discuss ways of “implementing” it.

      Every year since 1999 the OIC has steered through the U.N.’s human rights apparatus a resolution condemning the “defamation of religion,” which for the bloc of 56 Muslim states covered incidents ranging from satirizing Mohammed in a newspaper cartoon to criticism of shari’a and post-9/11 security check profiling.

      Critics regard the measure as an attempt to outlaw valid and critical scrutiny of Islamic teachings, as some OIC states do through controversial blasphemy laws at home.

      Strongly opposed by mostly Western democracies, the divisive “defamation” resolution received a dwindling number of votes each year, with the margin of success falling from 57 votes in 2007 to 19 in 2009 and just 12 last year.

      This year’s text was a departure, in that it dropped the “defamation” language and included a paragraph that reaffirms “the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance.”

      The nod to freedom of expression won the resolution the support of the U.S. and other democracies, with the Obama administration and others hailing it as a breakthrough after years of acrimonious debate.

      Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took the opportunity of the State Department-hosted talks with foreign governments, the OIC and other international bodies last week to stress the importance of freedom of speech in the U.S. She argued that “the best way to treat offensive speech is by people either ignoring it or combating it with good arguments and good speech that overwhelms it.” …

      Nonetheless, the resolution adopted in New York on Monday does contain elements that concern some free speech and religious freedom advocates.

      It calls on states “to take effective measures to ensure that public functionaries in the conduct of their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the basis of religion or belief.” [So, imho, the OIC should be criticizing the cops in L.A. who frog-marched that videographer out of his house the other night, persecuting him solely because of his COPTIC religious beliefs.]

      Governments also are expected to make “a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which is understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures.” [Again, religious discrimination and profiling in L.A., with questioning, searching, and investigation of that Coptic Christian who only exercised his fundamental rights under OUR SOVEREIGN CONSTITUTION to free speech, free exercise of his religion, and freedom to express both. The U.S. Constitution rules in the U.S., not some UN “resolution” not even signed by Obama.]

      “Effective measures” to counter cases of religious stereotyping and stigmatization include education, interfaith dialogue and “training of government officials.” [So how much is this crap costing the U.S. taxpayers?]

      And in the worst cases, those of “incitement to imminent violence” based on religion, the resolution calls on countries to implement “measures to criminalize” such behavior.

      Also of note is the fact that the resolution singles out for praise only one interfaith initiative – and that initiative was established by Saudi Arabia, a leading OIC member-state with a long history of enforcing blasphemy laws.” http://cnsnews.com/news/article/un-adopts-religious-intolerance-resolution-championed-obama-administration

      A RESOLUTION. VOICE VOTE? No record, so nobody SIGNED anything. They call it consensus (I guess like those decisions at the two U.S. political conventions.) They can call all they want for our country to CRIMINALIZE “incitement to imminent violence” but THAT applies to Muslim Imams inciting guys like Nidal Hasan to jihad and murder MORE than it applies to Copts calling for America to WAKE UP to the very real threat of Islamic Jihad and its infiltration of our country. Calling on people to attack and murder others (like U.S. diplomats) IS incitement. What’s NOT incitement is telling the (arguable) truth about the history and tenets of a religion. They’re trying to blame the truth-teller for the VIOLENT REACTION others have to hearing the truth, AS IF the truth-teller, simply by telling the truth, is CALLING FOR THEM TO RIOT AND KILL. They are responsible for their own actions. They, not the truth-teller. This video calls NO ONE to murder or riot. This video simply makes statements they should IGNORE, just as we try to ignore the hateful things that nearly EVERY Muslim government says about our country.

      • Thanks for finding that information. The truth of Islam is what they live. But they have not analyzed its tenants. It is all they know. They believe their actions are in keeping with what their good book says. They don’t know the difference. It appears to me that the Imans are the ones that do the teaching of hate and incite their followers and their word is taken as gospel. Why would the Iman lie to them? Third world countries are quite illiterate and until that changes, they will not question. Different culture and so backward.
        I am reminded of the great work of missionaries. They go into countries where Christianity is unknown and must get through all the superstitions associated with witchcraft. They are the ones responsible for spreading the word of Christianity around the world. It appears they have some real challenges in dealing with the Muslims who are indoctrinated from birth. One can see why that religion fits so closely with the communists even though the communists don’t want anyone worshiping any god. Propaganda, indoctrination, brainwashing, and changing history are the common denominators.

  28. New Posts Are Up.

    • Zenway, I went to college BEFORE political correctness and that is EXACTLY what I learned in comparative religion class about the founding of Islam AS A MEANS TO A POLITICAL AND MILITARY END. Whether or not Muslims took the religion and made a true religion of it later, it was founded as a military cult/political cult, to further the ends of a man who wanted to UNITE the warring tribes under one banner–his.

  29. Another good read…. with an unbelievable list of destroyers in charge…
    in front of our noses…. doing what they do best…. unbelievable still…
    http://patriotwarrior.org/2012/07/25/do-i-hate-barack-obama/

  30. http://www.amazon.com/Did-Muhammad-Exist-Inquiry-Obscure/dp/161017061X/ref=la_B001JPACI0_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1348009201&sr=1-1
    Robert Spencer’s newest book is powerful…. “1st review” sum it up.
    Barbara Simpson interviewed him…. knows his stuff…

  31. http://news.yahoo.com/free-speech-religion-clash-over-anti-muslim-film-091528663.html?_esi=1

    Look how even our own government is going to use thuggish inaction in order to bend us to the will of the Sharia masters. Oh, you can exercise your right of free speech, but hey! This government isn’t going to go out of its way to PROTECT YOU. Therein lies the threat. Shut up or we allow the jihadists to come after you. Why, we’ll even frogmarch you out of your home in the middle of the night, name you and tell where you live. That will shut up those pesky bloviating Americans.

    “The situation also raises vexing questions about how far the government can and should go to protect someone who exercises their First Amendment right. In the past, for example, police have stood guard to ensure Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan could march without being attacked for their views.

    But Nakoula’s case invites scrutiny because the free speech he exercised with the film “Innocence of Muslims” has had such far-reaching and violent implications.

    If the government were to overtly protect Nakoula, it could be seen by some as tacit approval of the film, and further enflame protests. Leaving him to fend for himself could have deadly consequences.

    There are examples of violence against others who have written or spoken against Muhammad. Egypt’s general prosecutor on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for seven expat Egyptian Coptic Christians, including Nakoula, and referred them to trial on charges of harming national unity, insulting and publicly attacking Islam and spreading false information. The charges carry the death penalty. [So, if they convict Nakoula, will Barry hand him over for the death penalty?]

    So far, the U.S. government has acknowledged offering Nakoula very limited assistance. Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies escorted Nakoula to an interview with federal probation officials. They did so in the dead of night and allowed Nakoula to cover his face. And early Monday, deputies answered his family’s request for help leaving the house where they’d been holed up for five days so they could reunite with the 55-year-old filmmaker. All remain in hiding.

    Department spokesman Steve Whitmore stressed the agency is not providing protective custody. He referred questions to federal authorities, who have declined to comment.

    Jody Armour, a professor at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law, said it’s “not unusual at all for the government to step in and give a citizen in distress or danger special protection, but it can’t be unlimited. They’re going to have to strike a balance.””

    Hmmm. I wonder how much help the U.S. government gave to Rushdie? He’s a liberal. A progressive, so …

  32. Another smidgen of info…..although,I know some may not be interested but….and this may be a bit out of theme with what’s been going on here lately ,but I am always off in directions nefarious to the mainstream of things. However it is related.
    Some may remember when I used to constantly be looking up addresses…I went back the other day for some reason that I’ve forgotten now, and looked up some Ndesandjo people. Sheila Ndesandjo/Marina/Mary are names relating to her. This person in Lawrenceville Georgia predominantly is most exactly the person who was the young black lady with her mother in a wedding picture of Joseph Ndesandjo’s and in the photo is standing with Mark Ndesandjo. So I assumed it may have been at one time, his first wife.Asumption is most likely close. THere was also a small boy. (the photos are wedding family photos taken soon as Joseph and Dora’s wedding is over. I have several snapshotos of the wedding from screenshots of the video. ANYWAY this SHeila, Marina, Mary person (one name may be the mother), was listed with another name predominantly as Burt(and Bertrand) Falls. Sometimes there is a Johnson name associated with Her. Marina N. Falls is Marina Falls. But using the other associated names listed with her family there is a Timothy Falls. Now Before I go on you can look up Bert Falls in Lawrenceville Georgia (try Burt,Bert, Bertrand) under mugshots in Lawrencevill Georgia and check him out. He sort of sounds like Omar ….driving with out a license. For now, I will revert back to Timothy Falls….I’ll try to keep this shorter…by just saying that as I followed these people and their associates around and decided that Timothy B. Falls was the likely person most associated with the Ndesandjo woman I finally typed in Timothy B. Falls in the search engine because he kept having an address in Georgia, Tx. and Honolulu. Vualla!./// Timothy Blaine Falls is a vetinarian person ,but listed with the government in Honolulu. It’s interesting to note also his office addresses were on the same street almost beside the department of immigration and other things such as this. THen, guess what I find him on a political contribution site, contributing to Dem. party stuff, but the kicker is he is a Hawaii State Delegate. Now I just find this astounding that I would find a Timothy Blaine Falls by looking for SHeila Ndesandjo in Georgia. I just think that would be impossible if there weren’t some connection to these people. What do you think, Anybody. I found this stuff the other day ,but ya’ll were busy talking about recent politics and news so I didn’t bring it up and didn’t save everything to post, but you can search the Bert Falls related to Mary or SHeila/Marina Ndesandjo and his mugshot. I am thinking he’s another illegal dude or something? and then Timothy…I probably will go back and check some more but someone see what they can find on TimothyB. Falls.

  33. http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/info/economic/data_reports/federal/fed.pdf
    See here he is listed with Federal employees. He is associated with Hawaii ports. And USDA…..There’s just something creepy,by the way I found him and that he would be here of all places. Not only that but he has another odd address in virginia.(can’t remember address right now). And he’s also listed like this in Louisiana. I didn’t realilze federal employees could be delegates either.

  34. This looks like it was filed between Oct. – December 2010. Was it the case Orly signed?

    Dr. Taitz, Esq
    September 20, 2012

    Same day as I will be arguing in KS, there will be an oral argument before the Supreme Court of PA on the decision by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court to suspend Philip Berg’s law license for 1 year and 1 day. Can someone be there an let me know, what went on? Apparently suspension starts after the Supreme court signs off on the decision by the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=305925

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s