©Bridgette@WTPOTUS 2012
On September 29, 2010, Dr. Eowyn described how a person’s name is placed into nomination in his article, “Hawaii Democratic Party Did Not Certify Obama’s Eligibility.”
In the United States, to become a party’s (e.g., the Democratic Party) presidential candidate, one must go through the following:
Step 1: Receive the votes of the majority of party delegates from the 50 states.
Step 2: The delegates’ votes are tallied and certified at the party’s national convention.
Step 3: Each state’s party must certify that the candidate is constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States of America.
Step 4: After the parties of all 50 states produced their Certificates of Nomination, the Chair of the National Party Convention also signs off certifying that the nominee indeed is constitutionally eligible.
It appears that Robert Bauer nor those in the Democrat Party took Larry Klayman’s threats seriously in his letter of August 29, 2012 as reported in my article, “Caught Between a Rock and Prison – Democrats Warned.” I queried, “How Will They Get Out of This?” Apparently, the DNC and the radicals controlling them are doubling down their game and continuing their fraud and deceit. Except now, having received a legal analysis from Larry Klayman stating the improprieties surrounding Obama’s eligibility, they can now be charged with election fraud. In light of that certified letter, their verifications and certifications are considered perjurious. This time around, they might not have a ” get out of jail free” card to play.
ProtectOurLiberty.org (Com. Kerchner’s blog) received a copy of the Democrat’s New York Nomination Form for Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The Nomination form is dated September 5, 2012. It states Obama and Biden are “legally qualified to serve under the applicable provisions of the United States Constitution.” The provisions that the Left finds Obama eligible under is the 14th Amendment, certainly not the constitutional requirement of Article II, Section 1. where it states the person must be a natural born citizen. There is no provision that allows an alien to become president of the United States. Obama’s eligibility and indeed his allegiance to our country is now in question as it has been for four years. His parentage, place of birth, and everything about the man who wants a 2nd term in office is highly suspect. Will the voters again be duped by this con man who refuses to prove who he is?
OFFICIAL CERTIFICATION OF NOMINATION
Stamped: Filed New York State Board of Elections Albany, New York 2012 Sep -6 PM 1:06
WE DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the following are the nominees of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following are legally qualified to serve as President and Vice President of the United States respectively under the applicable provisions of the United States Constitution:
For President of the United States
Barack Obama
5046 South Greenwood Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60615
For Vice President of the United States
Joe Biden
1209 Barley Mill Road
Wilmington, Delaware 19807
Signed:
Antonio Villaraigosa
Chair, Democratic National Convention
Alice Travis Germond
Secretary, Democratic National Convention
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Signed and sworn to before me this day by ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA and ALICE TRAVIS GERMOND.
Date: September 5, 2012
Monica C. Cole
Notary Pubic
My commission expires: 7 – 4-2015
Official 2012 DNC Nomination – NY – Obama – Biden
Click to Enlarge
Robert Bauer’s Letter to New York State Board of Elections
Further, it will be interesting to see if Hawaii’s Nomination form qualified Obama for 2012. They did not do so in 2008; instead, the wording was changed to fit the specificity of Hawaiian laws.
Who is going to step up and start the lawsuits? The mayor of Los Angeles, Antonio Villaraigosa, who signed the nomination form may be first in line to receive his due. Wonder if he knows he could be the fall guy. What is the fate of Alice Germond, Democratic Convention Secretary? What are the consequences for Robert Bauer, DNC’s legal counsel, who has been in on this cover-up from the start? Have they received assurances from the Obama White House, Eric Holder, or Bauer that they will be pardoned?
We will see shortly. We are waiting.
Bridgette
itooktheredpill
Miri
newssleuth
We the People of the United States 
Cancel the Presidential Debates – “We Have Unvetted Candidates”!
September 10th, 2012
Article II Super PAC, Full Page Washington Times Ad
http://www.art2superpac.com/fullpagead10.html
Since When are We the United State of America?
September 10, 2012 Snip
The original plan for this country was a federal, not Federalist, plan. It emphasized local government as the most important government for the individual. That plan took a slight detour with the Declaration and the Constitution, both of which included populist language (as if the national government could or should interface directly with “the people”), but, in effect, civil government even then was generally decentralized—local.
What did this mean? It meant you were free. If local officials became tyrants, you could either fight locally to have them removed or move to the next county or township. Finding a place where you could do pretty much whatever you thought was right was not terribly hard in a federal system.
http://politicaloutcast.com/2012/09/since-when-are-we-the-united-state-of-america/
Good article. And now we learn straight from the donkey’s mouth that WE BELONG TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT–THAT ONE “STATE” that the DemoncRATS want to create.
This is the guy that the Dems signed up for! The leader of the “free” world… WTH is he doing with his time that he doesn’t attend these? Who is leaking the information about this? Written by a right winger but published by the leftist Washington Post? The world is aflame … so what is the sucker doing instead?
Obama Skipping Staggering Amount of Daily Intelligence Meetings
September 10, 2012 Snip
One of the centerpieces of the Democratic case for Barack Obama‘s reelection in Charlotte last week was the President’s record on national security – specifically, his decision to pursue the operation that eventually led to the death of Osama bin Laden. That impressive achievement, however, may be blunted by the force of revelations by former Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen in today’s Washington Post. Thiessen writes:
President Obama is touting his foreign policy experience on the campaign trail, but startling new statistics suggest that national security has not necessarily been the personal priority the president makes it out to be. It turns out that more than half the time, the commander in chief does not attend his daily intelligence meeting.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/obama-skipping-staggering-amount-of-daily-intelligence-meetings/
Cheney responds to Obama’s reportedly poor intelligence briefings attendance[the meeting at which he is briefed on the most critical intelligence threats to the country!]
09/10/2012 Snip
Former Vice President Dick Cheney took a shot at President Barack Obama late Monday night after it was reported that the president has attended fewer than half of his daily intelligence briefings.
“If President Obama were participating in his intelligence briefings on a regular basis then perhaps he would understand why people are so offended at his efforts to take sole credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden,” Cheney told The Daily Caller in an email through a spokeswoman. “Those who deserve the credit are the men and women in our military and intelligence communities who worked for many years to track him down. They are the ones who deserve the thanks of a grateful nation.”
~
“During his first 1,225 days in office, Obama attended his PDB just 536 times — or 43.8 percent of the time. During 2011 and the first half of 2012, his attendance became even less frequent — falling to just over 38 percent. By contrast, Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, almost never missed his daily intelligence meeting.”
http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/10/cheney-if-obama-attended-intelligence-briefings-he-would-understand-why-people-are-so-offended-at-his-efforts-to-take-sole-credit-for-the-killing-of-osama-bin-laden/
One would expect EVERY PRESIDENT to attend EVERY daily intelligence meeting. Obama was not even “present”. Who was? Valerie and Mooch?
Absurd was the Democrats trying to take God out of their platform! Hit the Left over the head right up until election with this. They can’t deny that their party wanted God removed! Nor can they deny that they invited 20,000 Muslims to their convention!
‘Extreme & Untrue’: Obama Camp Hits Back After Romney Says We Need A New President to ‘Commit to a Nation Under God’September 10, 2012
On Saturday, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney seized upon the Democrats’ biggest convention-week gaffe (i.e. removing “God” from the party’s official platform) when he pledged, if elected, to put the nation back “under God.” The White House and the Obama campaign subsequently reacted strongly to Romney’s words, dismissing his comments and calling some of his allegations “absurd.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/absurd-obama-camp-hits-back-after-romney-says-we-need-a-new-president-to-commit-to-a-nation-under-god/
Check out the photo. Halo!
Anna Svizzero, at the NY Election Board, should take Bauer up on his offer to provide more information. Specifically: PROOF OF WHO OBAMA IS AND PROOF THAT HE’S ELIGIBLE TO BE POTUS. We don’t even KNOW how old he is. There’s no proof. We don’t know where he was born; his own literary agent stated, for over 16 years, that he was born in KENYA. We don’t know who his parents are; depending upon who they are, he may or may not be eligible. Bauer’s law firm got copies of Obama’s original long-form birth certificate. The State of NY should ask to SEE those documents. In person. In three dimensions.
What were they voting on that Boehner’s ruling was scripted on the telprompter? Anyone know? Party bosses don’t care what the delegates think is the issue. It is as Miri likes to say, it’s all “kibuki theatre” and the entire process scripted. Otherwise, how would they know the results before a vote was taken? Are there two answers that come up on the teleprompter, one when voted down and another to recognize a win? (giving them a benefit of the doubt, to much perhaps.)
H/T Helen – Ben Swann of Reality Check – first the RNC was caught red handed scripting their rule change and then we had the DNC caught…but, it’s the ending of Swann’s report that is most telling.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmaE2Aez_XY&feature=player_embedded
Obama’s Constitutional Scholarship Confined to Social Justice
10 September
An audio has surfaced of Barack Obama being introduced before giving about a 30 minute lecture on “the nature of community values” at the Nebraska Weslyan University in 1994. The video is 39.57 mins long. I have his introduction below. Follow the link below to read the BuzzFeed summation if hearing his voice will cause you to bang your head on your keyboard. It’s clear from his ‘lecture’ that he has little respect for Bill Clinton or Dan Quayle and feels immense empathy for poor Harriett, Ozzie’s famous wife who was a stay-at-home mom.
The wife is at home, she’s not working, Dad’s got his 9 to 5, there are no African-Americans in these family values.
Before getting to the introduction, we should remember that Obama claims he taught Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School, and the Left is fond of saying he was a “Constitutional Scholar.” In his entire career, there has not surfaced one article or review that he has written on the Constitution, but he has made a few derisive remarks about it.
A former Obama student, Thom Lambert say Obama taught only Constitutional Law III, which covers the Fourteenth Amendment, the rights of Citizenship and birthright. A long discussion ensues in comments.
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obamas-constitutional-scholarship-confined-to-social-justice
Finally, a real student of BHO’s class at Univ. of Chicago?
My Professor, My Judge, and the Doctrine of Judicial Review
Thom Lambert on April 3, 2012 Snips
Imagine if you picked up your morning paper to read that one of your astronomy professors had publicly questioned whether the earth, in fact, revolves around the sun. Or suppose that one of your economics professors was quoted as saying that consumers would purchase more gasoline if the price would simply rise. Or maybe your high school math teacher was publicly insisting that 2 + 2 = 5. You’d be a little embarrassed, right? You’d worry that your colleagues and friends might begin to question your astronomical, economic, or mathematical literacy.
Now you know how I felt this morning when I read in the Wall Street Journal that my own constitutional law professor had stated that it would be “an unprecedented, extraordinary step” for the Supreme Court to “overturn[] a law [i.e., the Affordable Care Act] that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”…
“[D]id he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison?”
I actually know the answer to that question. It’s no (well, technically yes…he didn’t). President Obama taught “Con Law III” at Chicago. Judicial review, federalism, the separation of powers — the old “structural Constitution” stuff — is covered in “Con Law I” (or at least it was when I was a student). Con Law III covers the Fourteenth Amendment. (Oddly enough, Prof. Obama didn’t seem too concerned about “an unelected group of people” overturning a “duly constituted and passed law” when we were discussing all those famous Fourteenth Amendment cases – Roe v. Wade, Griswold v. Connecticut, Romer v. Evans, etc.) Of course, even a Con Law professor focusing on the Bill of Rights should know that the principle of judicial review has been alive and well since 1803, so I still feel like my educational credentials have been tarnished a bit by the President’s “unprecedented, extraordinary” remarks.
http://truthonthemarket.com/2012/04/03/my-professor-my-judge-and-the-doctrine-of-judicial-review/
Sounds like there was more than a little self-interest in his choice of what to study about the Constitution.
It’s worth noting that the DNC not only doesn’t know whether he’s eligible under Article II–they also don’t even know if he’s eligible under the 14th amendment. Depending upon where he was born and to whom, he may not even be a CITIZEN of the US. A “native citizen” is ineligible but if they’re going to argue that he’s eligible AS a native citizen, first they have to prove that he is one. He said, via his own literary agent, for 16 years that he was born in Kenya. If SAD is his mother, he was NOT born a U.S. citizen. And if he was born in Kenya, of course, he wasn’t born a native or even an “anchor baby”. They have NO PROOF other than his current lie that he was born in Hawaii. Since he said he was born in Kenya and also that he was born in Hawaii, that’s proof that he’s a liar because BOTH cannot be true. Therefore, they cannot take his word for it and they have nothing as proof except a forged digital image, which is proof of nothing. But even IF they got something from Hawaii, it’s not probative because it’s late or altered and has never been certified/verified as TRUTH. Onaka pointedly would NOT state that the image on the WH blog is a true and accurate representation of his original birth certificate. He also would not follow the lawful procedure to provide a letter of verification in lieu of a certified copy and that’s because there can be no “in lieu of” something that cannot exist. The state of Hawaii CANNOT produce a CERTIFIED copy of his birth record because their own laws prevent them from doing so. The DNC cannot perjure themselves by swearing to something that they do NOT KNOW TO BE TRUE. I wouldn’t. Would you? I’m waiting for these people to be frog-marched.
You know, for those who think that the powers that be would not KNOW about how deep this eligibility issue goes and continue to HIDE it, here’s an example from WWII: The US (FDR, in particular) KNEW that the Soviets and NOT the Nazis murdered those Polish officers in the Katyn Forest. So as not to annoy STALIN, FDR hid the facts. http://news.yahoo.com/ap-exclusive-memos-show-us-hushed-soviet-crime-132109652.html
“The testimony about the infamous massacre of Polish officers might have lessened the tragic fate that befell Poland under the Soviets, some scholars believe. Instead, it mysteriously vanished into the heart of American power. The long-held suspicion is that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt didn’t want to anger Josef Stalin, an ally whom the Americans were counting on to defeat Germany and Japan during World War II.
Documents released Monday and seen in advance by The Associated Press lend weight to the belief that suppression within the highest levels of the U.S. government helped cover up Soviet guilt in the killing of some 22,000 Polish officers and other prisoners in the Katyn forest and other locations in 1940.
The evidence is among about 1,000 pages of newly declassified documents that the United States National Archives released and is putting online. Ohio Rep. Marcy Kaptur called the release Monday a “momentous occasion” in an effort to “make history whole.””
Oh Really….WHY NOW? hmm?
To give Barry some credit with the Poles, probably. To make it look AS IF he’s not on the side of the Russians and Stalin. Whatever. There’s some crap in the story about Barry that I didn’t copy. It was inserted to make it look as if the FOIA request only got done under him.
“legally qualified to serve under the applicable provisions of the United States Constitution.”
This could very well be a true statement, LEGALLY, and should read something like, “Constitutionally qualified…” or merely, “Qualified to serve according the the United States Constitution.”
“…under applicable provisions of the United States Con…….” is another play on words. What the hell are “applicable provisions” . . . Can be argued as exceptions and/or Supreme Court decisions in other areas of the constitution not dealing with NBC for presidency. This phrase can say other parts of the Constitution contradict the NBC requirement. (REQUIREMENT not provision)
The term LEGALLY means it can be argued in court to their favor.
“He is legally qualified because he was previously CERTIFIED and it was accepted by the states. “legally” relies on precedent.
Phrasing should be, “So and So meet the Constitutional requirements ……”
The wording last time around should have caught. I think some were not worded properly for John McCain, as well.
Antonio Villaraigosa – MEChA, La Raza, Sal Castro & the 1968 Chicano Blowouts, Villaraigosa also participated in the first grape boycott led by César Chávez. In 2007 Villaraigosa was under investigation for ethics violations also. He bankrupted LA, and is a big backer of Obama’s on immigration. I could go on and on. Is Villaraigosa even a natural born citizen? He was born in East Los Angeles to a Mexican-immigrant father and California-born mother of Mexican descent.
Is it any wonder why they choose Villaraigosa to certify Obama? HA!
A Communist from Communist California certifies a Communist to be President in Communist New York.
This is America under Obama.
Remember we own this country not the Government!! The Government works for us not the other way around!!!!! 🙂
The latest “Nomination Certificate” from the DNC contains a plethora of lawyer wordsmithing (as expected).
“Legally qualified to serve as President under applicable provisions of the US Constitution”
It says that they are deciding which provisions are applicable. Of course they would never say “constitutionally eligible”. Article 2 uses the word “eligible”, not “qualified”. They are deciding that the 14th Amendment is the “applicable provision” not A2S1C4.
Merriam Webster:
Qualified:
b: having complied with the specific requirements or precedent conditions (as for an office or employment) : eligible
So they are saying that he is complying w/ “precedent conditions”— using the court cases of Bowen and Ankeny— that’s what I mean by “manufactured precedent”— both cases discussion about NBC were dicta— after the determination of no standing. Even if Minor v. Happ. is dicta (it’s not), how is the dicta of a state court case more valuable than a SCOTUS case?
Merriam Webster:
Eligible:
a: qualified to participate or be chosen
The criminals are not saying that Obama is “Constitutionally eligible”, they are saying that he is qualified by their application of “accepted precedent” that a “born Citizen” (which has not been proven either) is a natural born Citizen.
My appeal brief is being written (by me) as we speak. I will make them all lie on the record, all the way to the top. The Light of History will spit on those in the judiciary that allowed the destruction of the Constitution. Some said here that Obama was just like any other POTUS– beholden to the banker criminals, but as I said all along, Obama is more than that– he represents the destruction of US Citizen sovereignty. Heck, they even demonize people who consider themselves to be “sovereign citizens”!!!! Now they are about to unleash more spending (they already gave $16T to foreign and domestic businesses and banks with no appropriation -media silent). They are also unveiling face recognition technology to go along with NDAA, TSA and red light cameras.
http://fredw-catharsisours.blogspot.com/2012/09/gulag-usa-updates.html
The American Constitution is dead. The final stab to the heart was the “election” of Barack Hussein Obama. I could not stand to watch much of the DNC (for protection of my tV), but what I did see were disgusting examples of people that were hypnotized, and slobbering all over themselves at the mere sight of the Usurper. My heart sank as the realization that these people live among us set in.
“No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders”.-— Samuel Adams
“How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!”— Samuel Adams
“If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”— Samuel Adams
Thank you, Dualer. This is what I was trying to articulate further upthread but did not get the job done. Play. On. Words.
Maybe in their warped logic, he’s “qualified” because of the precedent of having already usurped the position for the past four years.
So how is your case going Dualer? Is your case separate from the ones suggested in the letter that Klayman sent to Robert Bauer or is it inclusive? There were high hopes that Judge Lewis wouldn’t kick the can down the road, but he did.
Of course, you are right, but at this juncture of the well planned coup, they give a $hit?????!
Check out the Screen Shots – What do you read?
CNN Commits Birth Certificate Fraud To Cover For Obama’s Constitutional Ineligibility
Sept. 10
CNN states on their program that a picture of a real Hawaii birth certificate is Obama’s when it belongs to a Japanese-American (possibly Keith Suganuma) child born in 1960 to a father Francis (possibly last name Suganuma), 42, who was a police officer and a mother Mildred, 20.
Please review screen shots from CNN’s video and help fill in the rest of the pieces. I think the mother’s middle and maiden names may be Kazuo and Yashiki respectively.
Notice that CNN would not even post the forged birth certificate at whitehouse.gov. They had to “borrow” a real Hawaii birth certificate to pass off as aka Obama’s.
The media has been engaging in fraud – possibly criminal fraud, as they are to be named in a RICO complaint soon regarding Obama’s ineligibility and the pursuing cover-up.
See screen captures here. [Added below]
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/cnn-commits-birth-certificate-fraud-to-cover-for-obamas-constitutional-ineligibility
Link to Screen Shots of BC at CNN
CNN Commits Fraud To Protect Obama
http://www.scribd.com/doc/105458423/CNN-Commits-Fraud-To-Protect-Obama
Hold your comments. I will make a post so the wording on the BC is easier to see and we can keep our responses together.
A commment on the link board said this, “if you go back to the original airing of the CNN piece they admit that the birth certificate is not Obama’s at the 4:16 mark http://www.youtube.co/watch?v=8IhbcD1xksEfeature=plcp ”
I checked and it does say it is another man’s, but is this the original or a remake, so to speak? How to tell if added in later? I don’t think anything was adjusted because the bc is black and everyone knows/knew, even the reporters, Obama’s bc he issued is not black — and either is he!
I wrote a post and had found 3 videos. Pamela’s is different from the other two. CNN aired two segments, and so I think that is what the difference is. It posts tomorrow.
Israeli science website: Obama birth certificate forged
Award-winning, former Netanyahu adviser behind assessment
Monday September 10, 2012
Israel Science and Technology, the national database and directory of science and technology-related websites in Israel, has published an article asserting the long-form birth certificate released by the White House is a forged document.
The website was created by a former science adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel Hanukoglu, Ph.D.
Hanukoglu, an award-winning researcher, is a professor of biochemistry and molecular biology in the Department of Molecular Biology at Ariel University Center of Samaria in Ariel, Israel. The professor established the first version of his website during his tenure as Netanyahu’s science adviser. The site has evolved into “the premier science and technology portal for Israel.”
The website says that the White House’s release of the Obama document in April 2011, after years of controversy, “raised in our minds the possibility that there could be something suspicious about the information available on this document.”
The website conducted an independent analysis and cites others who came to the same conclusion.
The website says the publication “of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reigns on the most powerful country of the World.”
http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/09/israeli-science-website-obama-birth-certificate-forged/
Holy Toledo! Finally another country besides British Lord Monckton is speaking and it happens to be an Israeli!! I hope the guy in the WH is tossing and turning tonight! Keep visualizing hand cuffs and perp walks! Has he reported this to Prime Minister Netanyahu yet? Even the world is waking up! Such good news! Doing a little jig around the room!
I know Bridgette, me too! Happy dance 🙂 finally the WORLD is waking up to the fact that there’s a un-known in the White House!
From the Israel Science and Technology Homepage
Long-Form Birth Certificate of Obama is a Forged Document
A note of explanation
Since this is a site of Science and technology, there is a need to explain why this site dedicates a page to expose forgery about a document related to Mr. Barack Hussein Obama. Mr. Obama is the President of the USA that is currently the leader of the Free World, and the most powerful country in the Western hemisphere. In his position as the President, the policies pursued by Mr. Obama affects the whole world and not just the USA.
Because of the persisting controversy about his eligibility, On April 27, 2011 the Office of the President at the White House released a document that is called “Long-Form Birth Certificate”. The release of this simple document, after two years of controversy, raised in our minds the possibility that there could be something suspicious about the information available on this document. To check this, we downloaded the document that was posted at the White House site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf.
The analyses presented below reveal without a doubt that the Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama is a fabricated, fake and forged document.
The publication of such a blatantly fake document about something so basic as the birthplace of Mr. Obama, should raise great concern about the suitability of the person who is holding the reigns on the most powerful country of the World.
Moreover, the lack of action on the part of the members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate, as well as the courts of the United States, despite many previous appeals to these three branches of American government, also raise a concern about how the governmental institutions of the reputedly best, and certainly the most important democracy in the Free World have avoided this issue.
Below, we present two different means by which the PDF document of Long-Form Birth Certificate of Mr. Obama can be examined.
http://www.science.co.il/Obama-Birth-Certificate.htm
Of course, this should raise questions among other nations when we have touted the US to be a nation of laws. What an embarrassment Obama is and our Congress for not doing their duty and investigating the fraud!
Wouldn’t you like to be a fly on the wall in the White House? Imagine the calls from other leaders calling directly to question him, or the diplomats doing the chatter. The more the merrier, we are!
Congress will never bring up the issue because they allowed it to happen. I’d love to be a fly on the wall at the White House this next week, but I’d have too hold my nose!
I just found this – Boehner! O’s golfing “buddy”
Sheriff Arpaio’s Commander Mike Zullo Blames John Boehner For Congressional Inaction On Obama!
So Verna Lee is under “house arrest” just like Granny Sarah. The people at the assisted living place where she lives called the cops on Zullo when he tried to visit Verna Lee. He had to show the local cops his credentials. He wanted to interview Verna. He asked for the home’s procedure for visitors but the person at the desk kept asking him what he wanted. The director of the place called Zullo later and said Verna agreed to the interview with Verna’s husband present and the director. An hour and a half before the interview, the director called and said Verna “changed her mind” and sent this message: “I no longer work for the dept. of health and if you want to know anything, go ask them.” So he wasn’t allowed to interview Verna. Somebody got to the staff or Verna. Obviously.
He looked into Virginia Sunahara’s bc. The relatives are “staunchly opposed” by the state of Hawaii whenever they request copies of Virginia’s original bc. The HDOH gave excuses as if they’re preserving the originals as “old and brittle” historical documents. He was able to get more supporting information about Virginia’s life and death than Obama’s. He has “no supporting documentation” for Obama. He found none. Zullo has copies of Virginia’s medical records. (Probably got them from her brother.) Her documents are “fine”, stored at the hospital in an ordinary file cabinet, so the argument that the HDOH has to “preserve” the old documents is bull. Fukino claims to have handled and copied them on a machine, so …
Zullo says the way the HDOH was speaking to the Posse the first time they went to Hawaii is very suspect. He says it’s IMPOSSIBLE for the documents to have the WRONG sequence bc numbers. There’s no explanation for why Virginia’s number is (now) so much higher. The host says it’s clearly suspicious to deny a copy of Virginia’s original to her family. There’s no legal standing to deny it. Seems every time there’s a problem, some attorney connected to Perkins-Coie or Obama’s family shows up. Right on!
The investigation is “far from over.” Arpaio hoped to hand this off to Congress and he hoped somebody would pick it up. They are proceeding and more information may come in the next weeks. Arpaio is still talking about doing something even after the election. He’s onto CRIMES, not the potus. Fraud and crimes all over the place is what Arpaio is pursuing. “Phony” and “false” representations were made. Kapiolani won’t say they have any documents because they can’t say it, because they don’t have any (but they won’t say that). He says Obama won’t be potus forever and “one day this stuff is gonna surface and we’re going to know the truth.” (But Obama WANTS to be potus forever and he just might be.)
Boehner on the record told Congress not to bring up this issue at this time. They’re convinced they can win the election. They’re “not going to entertain this idea” at this time. Zullo feels like an American who has no voice. (Join the club, Mike.) “It’s like screaming into a pillow but that doesn’t mean you stop.” (I was thinking of this last night. All the brave people who will not stop. And we won’t. You know why? BECAUSE WE’RE AMERICANS. IT’S WHAT WE DO.)
Gillar got the same treatment from his local Tea Party people as we all get from Congress. They act as if the Tea Party people don’t realize that THE PEOPLE are interesting mightily in this issue. He says we sent a bunch of Tea Party “mavericks” to DC but NOT to kiss Boehner’s ass. He says this is the case with every single member of Congress. (Why, I ask? Because THEY KNOW the truth and they’re not telling. Just like FDR knew the truth about Katyn.) Gillar says they also blow him off about the phony draft card, acting as if they don’t know not having registered for the draft makes Barry ineligible.
No more press conferences from the Posse before the election, unless there’s a “game changer.” They have “encouraging leads to pursue” but no plans for a presser. They will release what they have “as best we can” because they believe the people “deserve it.” The Posse gets NO enquiries from the lamestream media. (No surprise.) Gillar says the “doors have been closed on Zullo” with NO RIGHT to do so, because the “organization” has been appointed by Obama. (What organization is he talking about? DOJ?) They hope if there’s a change of administration, there will be a change in the reception they get. Arapio, an ex fed, understands that this is a “game being played” but he will continue to pursue it. Arpaio “doesn’t give up.”
It occurs to me that if we do get a new administration that cares to investigate, that new FBI facial recognition software can help sort out all those photoshopped mug shots. 🙂
Yes, it should raise great concern, but for some unknown reason, it does not. So I suppose this eminent scientist is ALSO a “conspiracy theorist” and a “birther”?
hi, just mentioning – your first link in article does notseem to be working. “hawaii democratic party did not certify obama’s eligibility” that link. thank you.
Welcome and Thanks True, fixed it.