Is Obama Springing a Communist Surprise Come November?

*Springbok

© Miri WTPOTUS June 4, 2012  

In an article recommended by Bridgette, Ion Mihai Pacepa warns about what is happening to our country [emphasis added]:

History usually repeats itself, and if you have lived two lives, as I have done, you have a good chance of seeing that re-enactment with your own eyes. In 1978, I paid with two death sentences from my native Romania for helping her people rid themselves of their Marxist dictatorship, carefully disguised as socialism.

Thirty years later I witnessed how the same Marxism, camouflaged as socialism, began infecting the shores of my adoptive country, the United States, which had just won a 44-year Cold War against Marxism and against its earthly incarnation, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

In a 2008 column titled “Big Political Shifts Are Underway,” Joelle Fishman, chairman of the Action Commission of the Communist Party USA, strongly endorsed the Democratic Party’s candidate for the White House, appealing to all working people in the United States to back Senator Barack Obama, in order to provide “a landslide defeat of the Republican ultra-right.”

That new alliance between the Democratic Party and the Communist Party was a first in the history of the United States, the world’s headquarters of democracy and free enterprise. In November 2008, over 65 million Americans who were unable to identify the stealth virus of Marxism that was infecting the Democratic Party voted to give this party the White House and both chambers of Congress.

How many Americans understand that Obama and his most avid followers in Congress are indeed Marxists, if not Communists? Or that the Democrat Party is not merely “progressive”, but is at best socialist (at worst, Communist)?

This election, our fellow Americans must be advised of these facts, so that everyone realizes exactly who and what Obama is, before they vote for him again, and before they elect any other “Democrat” to Congress.

No matter their professed beliefs while running for office, once in DC, Democrats will march in lockstep with their socialist party leaders–Barack Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi.

Therefore, please do read Mr. Pacepa’s entire article and recommend it to all of your friends, but most especially to those who may vote for Democrats in November. Pacepa was an insider, so he knows stealth Marxists when he sees them.

Coincidentally, just this morning, I reviewed information I’d gathered about the May 19th Communist Organization in New York City, during the time that Obama was supposedly at Columbia University there. A quote from one article from 1984:

According to the FBI, militant feminists forged the group in 1976 from the remnants of the Weather Underground, the Black Liberation Army and lesser-known radical groups that sprang from the anti-war and civil rights movements of more than a decade ago.

The cause of these urban guerrillas of the 1980s is world socialism, in the style of Lenin and Marx. Their tools include bombs and bullets, say intelligence investigators with the FBI and New Jersey state police.

Under the banner of a shadowy parent group called at various times ”The Family” or ”The Collective,” the May 19th Communist Organization has committed numerous bombings and ”terrorist-style” armed robberies of armored cars to finance their cause, according to the FBI. The radicals say the holdups were ”expropriations” to fund a civil war and create the Republic of New Afrika in five southern states. …

The May 19th Communist Organization went public in 1981 with a statement to the press, according to the FBI. The group said it was committed to building a revolutionary movement that was ”part of the world-wide struggle to defeat U.S. imperialism,” an FBI spokesman said. The group said it aligned itself with other extremist organizations: the Black Liberation Army, the Puerto Rican Independence Movement, the Struggle of Native American Nations for Sovereignty and the Mexican-Chicano People for Liberation.

At a public meeting in 1983, the May 19th Communist Organization said it also supported the Republic of New Afrika (RNA), the Fuerzas Armadas de Liberacion Nacional Puertorriquena (FLAN [sic: FALN]), and the people jailed in the Brink’s case.

Also in 1983, the group said it was organizing ”white people within the (U.S.) empire committed to the development of armed struggle to win the liberation of oppressed nations and to bring about socialism,” the FBI spokesman said.

The above quote is from Radical Group Has Roots in ’60s by Ann O’Neill, Philadelphia Daily News; December 1, 1984. There’s no link; it’s available from a subscription database.

Many coincidences come to mind. Some facts:

(1) At Occidental in California, during his first two years of college, Obama spent much of his time organizing anti-apartheid activities.

(2) Between Christmas 1980 and the following summer, Obama ditched the name Barry Soetoro (or Barry Obama) and became Barack Hussein Obama II.

(3) Obama went to NYC to attend Columbia University around the same time that the May 19th Communist Organization began operating on the East Coast; at Columbia, Obama specifically sought out the “politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists,” according to his own book.

(4) Obama surely knew Bill Ayers and possibly also Bernardine Dohrn, both erstwhile members of the Weather Underground; Obama’s girlfriend, Genevieve Cook, attended Bank Street college at the same time as Ayers, in the early to middle 1980s. They all lived only blocks apart.

(5) The Springbok incident, where a Port Authority policeman was blinded by acid thrown into his face, happened in late Sept. 1981, after the school year started at Columbia; it involved an anti-apartheid protest; it involved many Columbia University students; this was the first semester that newly-renamed Barack Hussein Obama II attended Columbia, being fresh to that university after specializing in anti-apartheid activism at Occidental. (Of course, official stories differ about his time in attendance at Columbia, and Obama refuses to release any college records. Why the obfuscation?)

(6) The Springbok incident was traced to “a member of the 19th Communist Organization, a Marxist-Leninist organization that advocated the armed revolution and violent overthrow of the U.S. government.”

(7) Bill and Hillary Clinton, along with Eric Holder, orchestrated pardons for 16 members of Fuerzas Armadas de Liberation National (FALN) and Los Macheteros, terrorist organizations responsible for 130+ bombings and 6 murders.

(8) Eric Holder is now Obama’s Attorney General and Hillary Clinton is now Obama’s Secretary of State.

(9) The May 19th Communist Organization had connections to New Haven, Connecticut, which was the source for weapons and explosives they were charged with possessing in late December, 1984. (O’Neill article, cited above.)

(10) Obama’s social security number was allegedly issued in Connecticut, in 1977, although he never lived in Connecticut; Bill Ayers and his domestic terrorist associates were masters of creating false identity documents, including obtaining false social security numbers for themselves and cohorts. (When he wrote that linked article, Jack Cashill seemed unaware that Ayers and Obama coexisted in NYC for several years in the early ’80s.)

Many more such “coincidences” swirl around Barack Obama. It would behoove all Americans to ask this question before voting in November: Who is this man?

Is there an innocent explanation for every one of these coincidences? Perhaps. But so far, We the People haven’t been given any explanations. Instead, we’ve been called names simply for asking for our employee to provide particulars to back up his resume.

It’s long past time for the American people to ask these questions and to receive answers instead of stonewalling and insults.

########

* Photo source: Description Antidorcas marsupialis; Author Coda.coza

Advertisements

74 responses to “Is Obama Springing a Communist Surprise Come November?

  1. http://bankstreet.edu/campus-beyond/news/2012/02/06/bill-ayers-how-to-use-comics-in-the-classroom/

    I ran across that article linked above while researching this post and couldn’t find a way to work it in, but it’s amazing and unbelievable. Bill Ayers at an event at Bank Street college–a workshop about using comics to “teach” (I’d say indoctrinate) our children about “social justice.” We’ve seen Eric Holder’s version of justice. If I had a child in their schools, I’d say, “Thanks, but no thanks, Bill.”

    “‘In a complex culture such as ours,’ he [Ayers] said to the audience, ‘being a democratic person requires engagement with different media and different ways of interpreting and making sense of the world. We need to think of literacy as something that gives everyone access to everything.'”

    They offered examples of how they use comics to teach about topics such as “bullying” and “Western expansion.” I’ll bet. I can imagine how Western expansion is treated by this group.

  2. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/04/Exclusive-The-Vetting-Senator-Barack-Obama-Attend-Bill-Ayers-Barbecue-July-4-2005

    A fortuitous post at Breitbart’s. Imagine! Barry LIED when he said he barely knew Ayers. That he was just another guy from the neighborhood. Wasn’t the story also that their kids went to school together, when Ayers’s kids are many years older?

    “Obama’s association with Ayers continued even after Obama had been elected to represent Illinois in the U.S. Senate–in the form of a now-scrubbed blog post placing Obama at the home of Ayers and his wife, fellow radical Bernardine Dohrn, on July 4, 2005.
    Dr. Tom Perrin, Assistant Professor of English at Huntingdon College in Montgomery, Alabama, was a graduate student at the University of Chicago at the time, and maintained a blog called “Rambling Thomas.” He lived next door to Ayers and Dohrn in Hyde Park. He wrote at 8:44 a.m. on July 6, 2005:

    Guess what? I spent the 4th of July evening with star Democrat Barack Obama! Actually, that’s a lie. Obama was at a barbecue at the house next door (given by a law professor who is a former member of the Weather Underground) and we saw him over the fence at our barbecue. Well, the others did. It had started raining and he had gone inside be the time I got there. Nevertheless.”

    When contacted for more information by Breitbart, the doctor deleted his ENTIRE blog! Seeing as how he knows Chicago thuggery, one can hardly blame him.

  3. Know your enemy…

    Defeating the Rightwing on the Road to Socialism

    The election of Barack Obama was a blow to the right, but subsequent events have demonstrated that it wasn’t a decisive blow.

    The right still retains considerable power, and initiative to frame the debate and disrupt the legislative and political agenda.

    Its overarching goal this year is to regain control of all three branches of the federal government. How dangerous is that? In my view it would set the stage for a period of extreme rightwing onslaught.

    If you don’t believe me take a glimpse at Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio where rightwing Republicans took control of the levers of power in 2010 and then ruthlessly rolled back rights, eliminated social programs and attacked the labor movement.

    Those actions are a harbinger of what the Republican Party would do if in command of the federal government next year.

    By contrast, the decisive defeat of the right would weaken Wall Street and the entire corporate class, give leverage and momentum to the people’s movement and clear the ground for an era that puts people and nature before profits and “free markets.”

    But that will happen only if an electoral coalition is assembled that includes the left, progressives, independents and moderates.

    Said differently and dialectically, the defeat of the right at the polls next year cannot be achieved on a pure anti-corporate basis, given the existing relationship of forces. The 99 per cent versus the 1 per cent is a good slogan and representation of economic reality, but it doesn’t reflect the actual political balance of forces on the ground at this moment.

    The political complexion of the country is more complicated, thus making a broader strategy that reaches out to moderates (Republican as well as Democrats) and independents necessary.

    Moreover, such a strategy if successful becomes the basis on which tens of millions will encounter a new relationship of forces, which, in turn, is the ground on which to move to a higher level of understanding and struggle.

    None of this is to suggest that the Democrats aren’t now or won’t be in the future an obstacle to progressive change; in too many instances they are, but they aren’t the main obstacle for the moment.

    This election, then, is not about choosing a lesser evil. It is about our nation’s future: are we going to move in a progressive-democratic or rightwing anti-democratic-authoritarian direction (I distinguish this characterization from fascism which has a particular meaning – the open terroristic dictatorship of the most backward sections of the capitalist class – in the communist movement)

    Thus, the labor-led people’s coalition, and Communists as a current within that coalition, must make every phase of the election process a number one priority.

    • What are they smoking? Rolled back “rights”? How so?

      It isn’t just Republicans cutting “social programs”. In Illinois the DemoncRAT legislature and governor have cut “social programs”, too. They have no choice. There’s NO MONEY.

      WE CAN’T AFFORD IT.

      They want to “weaken Wall Street?” Forgive me, but wasn’t a weak Wall Street what brought about this years-long Obama recession (or depression)? With a permanently weakened Wall Street, where will people work? Who will employ these laborers, members of the “labor movement” or not?

      They call conservatives “authoritarian?” They can say that after all the heavy-handed policies Barry has put into place? The onerous attempts at regulating everything–from what we eat, to what we watch, to what we do on the Web, to controlling banks, churches, insurance companies, not to mention ramming Obamacare down our throats? How authoritarian is planning to use armed drones in the US, against US citizens? Or planning to detain US citizens indefinitely, without trial, on Barry’s say so? How about assassinating terrorists, even US citizens, from 30,000 ft. via drones that fly into other sovereign nations without permission? Imagine had Bush done any of this! Barry assassinates, whereas GWB merely interrogated. But these progressives? Crickets.

      What makes them believe THEY will be immune from his authoritarianism?

      Ed Schultz is right: If Romney wins and (better yet), the Republicans take Congress and the Senate, there just MAY never be another Democrat president in our lifetimes. Why? Because if that happens, then the sum total of this communist/Marxist conspiracy will be revealed in full. The American people will be aghast. Pray this happens. The TRUTH shall set us free.

  4. This is what COMMUNIST dictatorships do: http://www.examiner.com/article/marine-veteran-arrested-at-labor-union-rally-wisconsin-releases-a-statement

    A Marine veteran was arrested yesterday at a rally in Wisconsin where Bill Clinton appeared. It must have been one of those special places where Secret Service RULES. His crime? Apparently being a Tea Partier. Union supporters surrounded him and argued with him, but he got arrested:

    “Yesterday, the Paulding County Republican Examiner reported that on Friday, a U.S. Marine veteran was detained and arrested by police after being heckled and yelled at a rally hosted by former President Bill Clinton for Democrat Tom Barrett, by Milwaukee, Wisconsin democrats and labor union members in an attempt to recall Republican Governor Scott Walker.

    Today, we learn that the veteran’s name is David Willoughby, the son of Naples, Florida Tea Party founder Barry Willoughby. Early this evening, he released an email statement concerning his arrest and detainment which was sent by his father to Jan Morgan, an Associated Press Award winning veteran television journalist and acquaintance of the Paulding County Republican Examiner.

    In relating his experience, he said, “My name is Dave Willoughby. I am the one in the video.”

    Without being told what I had done, I was handcuffed and escorted off premise. Placed in a squad car and taken to a police station. I asked if I should have my rights read to me and was told “You’re not being arrested.” My personal property was taken from me, I was fingerprinted, mug shot taken and locked in a dark jail cell, lights off, still handcuffed, “said Mr. Willoughby.

    Willoughby went to say, “I sat in that jail cell, looking out of a meshed wire window, at a large American flag flying in the background. Where am I? How can this be happening? What did I do wrong? I prayed for strength. When I swore the oath to protect and defend the Constitution, I never realized until recently, how vulnerable our precious freedoms actually are.”

    I did nothing wrong, “said Willoughby. “There were literally hundreds of cameras at this event. I challenge all media to find one shred of evidence, which would support the actions of the Milwaukee PD officers.”

    “Does Mayor Barrett approve?”

    Mr. Willoughby was arrested when he attempted to state to police that he had a constitutional right to be there like everyone else and that he did nothing wrong. Police charged him for allegedly disturbing the peace.

    As Mr. Willoughby was led away by police, labor union and democrat protestors heckled the veteran, calling him a criminal and that he needs to be in jail.”

    I guess it all depends upon what the meaning of “arrest” is, whether or not you get your Constitutional RIGHTS anymore. Welcome to the OBAMANATION. Will anyone in Congress stand up for this Marine? Semper Fi?

    • Rosemary Woodhouse

      Okay Miri, I love this blog as you well know! But since y’all are always “riffing” on names (not futile at all!! ) I am tongue in cheek commenting on the man’s name. Willoughby. One of my favorite Twilight Zone episodes. 🙂

      • Oh, yeah. I remember that one, too. I thought that name sounded familiar.

      • Rose…are you guys joking ? Is this guy named Willoughby really ? Kidding me..This is the same group I am now working across the hall..(Enlightment) Same group across the pond too. Middleton, Sutton etc…rally…Miri, are you noting this coincidence ?
        Willoughby….
        Stanley
        etc….
        hummm…
        http://thepeerage.com/p268.htm

        • Rosemary Woodhouse

          Renee, when you write “across the hall” (which I frequently see) what meanest thou?

          Are you seriously about the name?!!? I was joking about the TZ episode where a man is stuck in a dead end but prestigious job with a wife who only cares about keeping up with the wealthy Jonses. Nightly, he falls asleep on the train during his miserable commute home. In his dream he imagines he is on a train from the late 1800s (?) and the old fashioned train conductor cries “Willoughby. Next stop, Willoughby”. The man in question glances out the train window night after night to behold a lovely, peaceful town…kids w/ fishing poles, a man riding a unicycle, a couple walking arm in arm, people in old fashioned garb; in other words, that which would appear peaceful to a stressed out man with a miserable life.

          One day, after an especially harrowing day he decides to disembark at Willoughby. As it turns out, he commits suicide by throwing himself from the train (when in his dream he is merely exiting onto the platform) and the last scene depicts a hearse w/ Willoughby & Sons Funeral Home stenciled on the rear door. Rod Serling was a genius!

        • Rosemary Woodhouse

          Y’all possess true tenacity, intellectual curiosity and uncanny research abilities. I am so proud to “know” all of you albeit via the net. There’s so much to digest “across the hall”. Thanks so much Renee! xox. It’s now bookmarked.

  5. The “social justice” theme- which really is less about social justice than about -“you oppressed me, you owe me, I deserve it, you don’t – even if you worked your ass off to get it”- is permeating schools throughout this country, and is especially prevalent in college curricula in Universities. I was not surprised to see the emphasis on this in some of my sociology courses, although I was surprised to see video presentations featuring injured and dead Native Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanics with the commentary repeatedly blaming any and all people of European Descent. Not an uplifting (and somewhat one sided) view. Oppression and social justice were themes of focus in every course in my curriculum. I was, however, surprised to see the same thing turn up in a friend’s Public Relations and Advertising courses – same thing, but without the gory visuals – Europeans oppressed everyone. They’re to blame for poverty throughout the world. They need to pay.

    This is very sobering and heartbreaking information presented in the article. And, sadly, when you speak in truthful,realistic terms about social justice, it appears that you lack concern for the poor, ill, and down-trodden. Nothing could be further from the truth for most of Hillary’s supporters. We were all (well most) “good Democrats” who supported entitlement programs. I still do support them, as do most of the people I know. But, I draw the line at taking the blame for every bad thing that ever happened to a person of color from the dawn of time, and don’t actually want to continue to work two jobs, and give the gov’t the salary from one of them – in the name of social justice.

    The thing missing in social justice (as the term is misused in today’s society) is justice.

    • You know, if they really did understand and care about bullying, then they would “feel” for the students of European descent and not tar them with the “original sin” of “racism” that all these social justice classes teach. They make pariahs out of “white” people. They teach the students to be ashamed of their ancestry, even when there’s not one shred of evidence that their ancestors had ANYTHING TO DO with these “crimes”. Just sharing the same skin tone is enough to label these kids as born racists and make them ashamed of their own families. THAT’S BULLYING and it’s officially sanctioned bullying.

      What’s ironic is that Obama identifies himself with the “oppressed” black descendants of slaves and yet he’s NOT a descendant of slaves himself but is a descendant of slave OWNERS! So when will he pay reparations for the sins of his ancestors?

      I’ve written here before that Europeans themselves are descendants of slaves. The SLAVIC races are so-named because they WERE slaves. Synonymous with SLAV-ery. Enslaved by the Romans and others. So it’s the history of the world and there’s not a race on Earth that hasn’t been associated with being slaves or taking and keeping slaves at some point in time.

      Even today, in Africa and the Middle East, there are SLAVES. Not to mention that in the Middle East, WOMEN are mostly enslaved. They certainly have no freedom.

      You wrote, “when you speak in truthful, realistic terms about social justice, it appears that you lack concern for the poor, ill, and down-trodden. Nothing could be further from the truth for most of Hillary’s supporters.”

      Nothing could be further from the truth for most conservatives, also. Just because we speak the truth about the LIES that Marxists tell in order to get and keep power, doesn’t mean that we have no compassion for the truly needy. The Democrat Marxists want to keep people on their “reservation” forever. In other words, to keep them poor, needy, and DEPENDENT upon them and the government they run for EVERYTHING. That way, they have power in perpetuity.

      Hillary Clinton is and was complicit with this all along. All along. I used to believe that she was a shade better than Obama. I no longer believe that. She is interchangeable with him. If she had integrity, she would have exposed him and saved our Nation from the past four years. But she did not. She joined him.

      • Rosemary Woodhouse
        • I read that. Krauthammer said Bill’s like a double agent with his snarks and not-so-subtle sabotage. He’s praising Romney’s business acumen and saying he passed the bar to be a president! Hilarious. But he also took credit for the Gingrich/conservative surplus and balanced budgets. Four times! He was led there kicking and screaming because he really had no choice.

          • Rosemary Woodhouse

            Still very disappointed about Gingrich, but as Breitbart sagely said before his mur….death, we must act like the dems and get fully behind whoever the nominee is. No splinters. No protest votes. All in for Romney! The only way to get back on track and SOMEWHAT undo the massive damage inflicted by the Great Oretender.

            • I know. It will be like 2008 again; holding my nose. I feel some hope and change this morning and already am mentally moving on for the likely fights we’ll have with our own (supposed) guys once they’re in. We have to be ready to hold their feet to the fire. This will be GWB’s faults all over again: compassionate conservatism. NOPE. Close the freaking border and NO DREAM ACT and NO AMNESTY. No pathway to CITIZENSHIP. I really don’t care if they give a pathway to legality, but NO CITIZENSHIP. If we absorb millions of people (especially in swing states or red states) who come from quasi-Marxist countries and/or from south of the border where people are accustomed to having their votes bought with benefits (thinking Chavez and Morales here), we’ll be back at this point again. We must make Ed Shultz’s nightmare come true: Not another DemoncRAT POTUS in our lifetimes.

          • Rosemary Woodhouse

            Pretender. Edits galore!

  6. 115 S. Sangamon Street, Chicago, IL. mid-1990s. Barack Obama, Bill Ayers, and Mike Klonsky. Cozy.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20110424003753/http://www.verumserum.com/?p=2907

  7. Miri, I respect your right to your opinion, but I vehemently disagree about Hillary and what you see as her failure to expose Obama (she tried – but MSM was not going to give her or any other person who opposed Obama the opportunity to reach an audience of any size. Hillary and others tried, repeatedly). I think that she and Bill C. both felt that any substantive work for the good of this country would have to come through a political party – which, for them, was the Dem Party. And, that without access to the power and money from the party, there is little way to gain even a small amount of ground. This points to the need, even more, for a viable third party, and a change in the way politics is carried out in this country.

    Thanks for making the point about the Slavs being the origin of the term “slave”. When I’ve made that point in conversation about this issue, people look at me like I’m making it up. Glad to have someone else point it out.

    • Do show any article where Hillary is exposing Obama rather than supporting him after he won the nomination. Hillary is as much a Marxist as Obama is and she has been a lousy Secretary of State. I don’t care what the polls show as to how popular she is with the Left..I don’t know of one good foreign policy that she has initiated or even consummated, unless it is to show the lack of a foreign policy that is familiar to any of us. They have their own agenda, and no one has figured it out. We have more enemies and less respect around the world.

      It was her report to the UN that said the US should be investigated for human rights violations – we are guilty of human trafficking! She wanted the US to equal China or the other countries that really do have problems? If she wasn’t going along with the policy agenda of this regime, she should have quit long ago. She and Bill knew Obama wasn’t eligible, as Bill said it once when asked a question …and he referenced the Constitution.

      She has called herself a “modern progressive. ” She is a modern socialist/communist/Ismista? She hired a woman, Weiner, whose mother is heavily associated with the Muslim Brotherhood – how perfect is that! Do you think Weiner hasn’t passed along information to her mother? She is pushing Law of the Seas right now – for more redistribution of our nation’s wealth and to put the US under the watchful corrupt eyes of the UN!

      I wonder what happened to the RICO lawsuit against Obama that she filed. Oh, she was made Secretary of State shortly after that was initiated. Maybe someone paid off her huge campaign debt also, payment for silence?

      If she and Bill opposed Obama and his policies, why would the criminal Bill Clinton be out campaigning for him? Do watch the Clinton Chronicles and see how Hillary and Bill laundered money and killed everyone that got in their way. Through her law firm, Hillary set up front organizations to launder money from the government, illicit agencies and organizations, and drug trafficking. She and Bill are in it up to their eyeballs. Billions of dollars were sent to Haiti – and there was no change anywhere in that country. How could that be? Where did all the money go?

      Anyone still on the Hillary bandwagon better open their eyes to reality.

      In November, we WILL RESET this government.

      • Wow! Well said and great memory, Bridgette. People need to see these people for who and what they are. Hillary is a Soros puppet. She was always FAR to the left of her husband.

      • Exactly. Hillary and her ilk of so called “strong women” haven’t met a misogynist, abusive, narcissistic, weak man they weren’t willing to carry water for. They stand for nothing….even to the point of the same blame game Obama uses….as did miss Hillary when she embarrassed herself by excusing the continuous terrible behavior of her husband, to her own detriment, on others who had nothing to do with his accusations. She’s another Alinsky fan and another one willing to have her own background exaggerated, esp. her degree of intelligence, having not even passed the bar exam. She couldn’t even get enough business as the Gov’s wife while with the well known law firm in Arkansas. Bill had to tell his buds to throw Hillary a little work. They’re all fiction personalities with no substance.

        • Excerpts From Hillary’s Wellesley Thesis, “THERE IS ONLY THE FIGHT… An Analysis of the Alinsky Model” * Updated *

          If what I have received is a true and accurate copy, then here is one of the most anticipated revelations of the 2008 presidential election: Hillary Rodham’s 1969 senior thesis at Wellesley.
          This nearly 100-page inquiry into the thought, activism, and applicability of radical organizer Saul Alinsky may be considered, until proven otherwise, the young Ms. Rodham’s first intellectual blueprint. Depending on how capably its readers trace the 1969 document’s influence on her subsequent public record, “THERE IS ONLY THE FIGHT” may prove one of the most authoritative standards by which to evaluate and judge Hillary Rodham Clinton’s subsequent undertakings — professional, political, and even personal.

          In 1993, shortly after she had acceded to the role of First Lady, the Clintons requested that Wellesley guard her thesis from public scrutiny — a request with which the college administration complied. If this is a true and accurate copy, then public access to the presidential candidate’s first intellectual formation has finally arrived.

          * * *
          Here are some excerpts, Gentle Reader, so that you may begin to better judge Hillary Rodham Clinton for yourself. Want to see what Hillary Clinton’s plans are? Here are excerpts from the infamous 1969 senior thesis in which she lays out the life plan she has followed ever since. She calls for a “social revolution”a little detail that recent thesis articles seem to have overlooked.

          In 1969 Hillary Rodham was a senior at Wellesley College. Elected to give the graduation speech, the ladies of Wellesley were not let down. Rodham was known as an intellectual and a powerful leader – traits which are hard to ignore today. Unlike college leaders, when one runs for President of the United States you must ask whether that person is a good leader, or the right leader. Rodham/Clinton gives us the play book to her soul and her political roots in this wordy thesis. In it, Rodham/Clinton laid out her thoughts on the teachings of Saul Alinsky, the defacto head of community organizing and grass roots politics. Saul Alinsky was a radical and many tie his teachings to socialism becasue of their community mindedness. It is essential for the voting public to fully understand all candidates; this document helps us understand Hillary Rodham Clinton. what is unique about this document is that it has garnered much attention during Rodham/Clinton’s years in politics. For the entirety of the Bill Clinton Presidency it was hidden from the general public. Why you ask? read for yourself … choose your reading format:

          CHAPTER I
          SAUL DAVID ALINSKY: AN AMERICAN RADICAL
          http://www.gopublius.com/HCT/HillaryClintonThesis.html

          CHAPTER I
          SAUL DAVID ALINSKY: AN AMERICAN RADICAL – pdf file
          93 Pages
          http://www.gopublius.com/HCT/HillaryClintonThesis.pdf

          1 posted on Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:34:16 AM by AndrewWalden
          http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1874599/posts

        • You’re right. She AND Bill have fictional backgrounds. I wonder: Did it begin with them or were there previous DemoncRATS with bogus life stories? Surely not Carter. You can’t make him up. I believe he was real. Just what he said he was. Nobody would invent Billy. 🙂

          Hillary was and is a follower of Alinsky. She’s ALSO FROM THAT CESSPOOL OF CHICAGO.

          Bill is Bill. If we had to have one of them, I’d rather Bill than Hill. He’s from the South and has a modicum of southerness within him. I don’t believe he’s anywhere near as far left as his wife and he’s certainly smarter than she. I think he was easily “managed”, as Obama is managed by Mooch and Valerie the Iranian witch.

          Wouldn’t it be something if Dr. P’s theory is correct and one of our theories is also correct: Barry is David, the elder of twins, and his twin, that woman who’s like a sister to him, IS a sister to him and she was named after their real mother and both share those dreams from their father?

          • Never thought I would say that I miss Bill Clinton!!! He is more of a traditional democrat, regular politician type, not like the communist idealogue Alinsky zombies.
            And Bill is actively undermining Obama. He wants Romney to win.

          • My mom loves Slick Willy still. She says he is a handsome rascal, but loves America she feels.

            • I used to believe that but I don’t anymore. If either of the Clintons loved America, knowing what they know and the power they have in the DemoncRAT party, they would not have allowed Obama to set foot into the WH, much less joined his administration or campaigned for him. If that’s love for America, then I don’t want to see their hatred for America.

      • Rosemary Woodhouse

        Brava, Bridgette! Brave!

        Walker’s win must have them (pardon the vulgarity) $hitting their bloomers. I do expect a false flag, but then again…..doesn’t everyone?

        There was a twitter feed that a girl showed up with a crumpled cable bill and was allowed to vote. Unions were busing them in from all over the nation and still Walker won. We still must be on guard. Voter fraud will be their only weapon. Disclaimer: yes, I used the word “weapon” , but in the faith of our president, peace be upon him.

        • Some pundit once said that Republicans must win in a blow out in order to defeat all the DemoncRAT cheating and fraud. This is Soros’s Secretary of State Project in action. But even 400 lawyers and buses full of bogus voters wasn’t enough. They will try this all over the country in November. They know this is their last gasp. When adults are in charge again, then they KNOW all the truths will come out. Unless, as with GWB, they decide that it’s better for the country to make nice and suppress the truth. I can see that happening, to preserve the illusion of a legacy for the “first” African-America potus. I bet he’s not African AT ALL.

          http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/06/06/MSM-Exit-Polls-Comfort-Obama?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+6%2C+2012&utm_campaign=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+6%2C+2012&utm_term=More

          That writer says what I’ve said before: The media LIE in their polls to keep their partisans fired up, to demoralize opponents, and to set the stage for voter fraud (I said the last one; he didn’t). All are important to pull off the cheating. Only if the polls look close and if the win looks plausible, will they get away with their cheating. I didn’t know that the exit polls were that far off–that they said it was a tie.

          I did read in this morning’s paper the “good news for Obama” that Wisconsin voters are for him over Romney. Apparently THAT’S A LIE, TOO. But now they KNOW that to win Wisconsin they MUST cheat. They MUST come up with a new strategy TO cheat and this lie sets the stage for the amazing “come back” by Barry in November. I’ll bet it’s Panic City at the DNC this morning.

          Nolte wrote, “Wisconsin exit polls, released just after the state’s polls closed at 8pm CT, showed the recall race between Republican Governor Scott Walker and his opponent, Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, tied at 50/50. And was the corrupt media giddy? Oh yes they were.

          Not only was the MSM giddy over the idea Walker might lose, but they then drip-drip-dripped all the internal numbers that spelled gloom and doom for our side. But the number the media was most excited to share was that exit polls showed Obama beating Romney in Wisconsin by seven points. ABC News says nine:

          Wisconsin voters by 52-43 percent said they’d support Obama over Romney if the election were today, the ABC News exit poll found, by 43-37 percent picked Obama to do a better job than Romney handling the economy and by 47-36 percent preferred the president on “helping the middle class.”

          Yes, the media is still quoting exit polls that couldn’t even get the main event correct.

          The results between Walker and Barrett aren’t 50/50. It wasn’t even close. Walker trounced Barrett by an even wider margin than when they squared off in 2010: Seven points instead of six.

          And yet, as of this morning, the media is quoting exit polls that were a full seven points off in favor of the Democrat as good news because they show a seven to nine point lead for Democrat Barack Obama.

          The media will tell you that the exit polls have been adjusted since they were first released, but adjusted crap is still crap.

          You see what they’re doing here?

          2012 will hinge on turnout, especially in swing states such as Wisconsin, and the media doesn’t want the supporters of Their Precious One demoralized.”

    • If someone with the clout and the ears and eyes of the mainstream media had told the TRUTH about Obama, MUCH HARM that’s been done to this country would have been avoided. It was a simple thing to do: Tell the truth. The Clintons did not. All you have to do is look at the pardons handed out when Clinton left office to know what camp they are in. I’m sorry, but it’s true. We shall agree to disagree.

  8. Hillary long ago lost MY RESPECT….. I’m OVER the HILL’

    • Good one, Zenway! I’m thinking of the guys who have been tracked down for decades, since WWII, when their only “crime” was to train guard dogs at the Nazi death camps, under fear for their own lives and their family. There’s no sympathy for them. They kept quiet and harm was done. They are still being tracked down, prosecuted and persecuted. Is there a difference here? Only in degree.

      • We the people be the real dogs and we will track them down…watch and see. There won’t be a free ride when these commies are booted out of office; they can’t hope for pardons then either.

  9. Social Justice Movements

    Q: What is the Republic of New Afrika (RNA)?

    A: In the late 1960s, at the height of the Black Power Movement, two acquaintances of Malcolm X, Gaidi Obadele and Imari Abubakari Obadele assembled a group of 500 militant black nationalists in Detroit, Michigan, to discuss the creation of a black nation within the United States. On March 31, 1968, 100 conference members signed a Declaration of Independence outlining the official doctrine of the new black nation, elected a provisional government, and named the nation the Republic of New Africa (RNA).

    The RNA believes that as a nation, black people are entitled to the full rights of a nation, including land and self-determination. Furthermore, Amerikkka as the land upon which Black People (New Afrikans) have lived, toiled and made rich as slaves is theirs; it is land that Blacks must gain control of because, as Malcolm X said, land is the basis of independence, freedom, justice and equality. The RNA even identified the five states of Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina as Black People’s land. According to the RNA, gaining control of our land is the fundamental struggle facing Black People; without land, Black Power, rights and freedom have no substance.

    (See PHOTO of RNA leaflet – Courtesy of Brown-Tougaloo Exchange)

    http://socialjustice.ccnmtl.columbia.edu/index.php/Republic_of_New_Afrika

    • Malcolm X Grassroots Movement

      Malcolm X Grassroots Movement (MXGM) was founded in 1993, to defend the human rights of our people and promote self-determination in our community. MXGM was founded in Brooklyn, NY but has now expanded to seven chapters throughout the United States.

      http://socialjustice.ccnmtl.columbia.edu/index.php/Malcolm_X_Grassroots_Movement

      MXGM offers a radical ideology rooted in a strong tradition of resistance to the status quo. Community attention, international solidarity, pedagogical institutions, self-determination, a socialist critique of capitlism,[sic] a commitment to equality of the sexes, and an openness to defense by any means necessary are all central tenets to the MXGM.

      These philosophies are embodied in the programs of MXGM as well as in their literature and workshops.
      PRINCIPLES…..See reparations…THE US owes them!

      http://socialjustice.ccnmtl.columbia.edu/index.php/HISTORY

    • History of the Republic of New Afrika (RNA), Including Essay on Dr. Imari Obadele
      By RBG Street Scholar on May 8, 2007 snips

      Red, Black, and Green Horizontal Stripes is the Republic of New Afrika flag first used by Marcus Garvey.

      The use of Red, Black and Green as colors symbolizing African nationhood was first “adopted by the UNIA-ACL as part of the 1920 Declaration of Rights as the official colors of the African race. The question of a flag for the race was not as trivial as might have appeared on the surface, for in the United States especially, the lack of an African symbol of nationhood seems to have been cause for crude derision on the part of whites and a source of sensitivity on the part of Afro-Americans.

      The race catechism Garveyites used explained the significance of the red, black, and green as for the “color of the blood which men must shed for their redemption and liberty”, black for “the color of the noble and distinguished race to which we belong,” and green for “the luxuriant vegetation of our Motherland. Today, there are many African Nations that have adopted the colors Red, Black and Green after the great Marcus Garvey and his program of African Redemption.

      http://www.zimbio.com/RBG+Afrikan-+Centered+Cultural+Development+and+Education/articles/84/RBG+Tribute+Afrikan+King+Honorable+Marcus%5D

    • Sounds like “Reverend” Wright’s religion.

  10. Destroy what is near and dear – an aim of Communists. How better to do that than take away the traditions and replace them. This is another way…

    Springsteen favored to write new US anthem: poll
    Born in the USA!

    Twenty-two percent of Americans think veteran rocker Bruce Springsteen should compose a new US national anthem to replace “The Star-Spangled Banner,” suggests an online poll requested by CBS [Communist Broadcasting System] current affairs show “60 Minutes” and Vanity Fair magazine.

    Based on a poem by Francis Scott Key describing the British naval bombardment of Fort McHenry in Baltimore, Maryland during the War of 1812, “The Star-Spangled Banner” has been the official US national anthem since 1931.

    I can’t imagine who would think that the Star Spangled Banner should be replaced, can you? Who are the 22% – but the Anti-Americans – the Ismistas! More distraction, more demoralizing from the Left.

    http://news.yahoo.com/springsteen-favored-write-us-anthem-poll-215026210.html

  11. If Sandra had admitted to taking money for her trysts, we could popularize the word whore too!. As if the sluts are really so offended…so offended that they open a website to red letter themselves! Sluts unite under the Democratic Party! This is going to backfire big time!

    Sluts’ Unite Against Republicans, Rush Limbaugh
    Watch out Republicans, here come the sluts.
    June 5

    Women’s rights activists are banding together to “Rock the Slut Vote” in an online effort to register women to vote and cast their ballots against Republicans in 2012. “If the GOP thinks that throwing the word ‘slut’ at us at this point is going to silence women they have another thing coming,” said Susan McMillan Emry, the site’s founder.

    Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh thrust the derogatory word into the political arena in February when he called law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” for testifying before Congress in support of contraceptives. [He labeled her correctly! She was stupid enough to bring attention to herself! What did she expect? She needed the government to pay for her condoms so she wouldn’t be punished.]

    Following the national backlash over Limbaugh’s name-calling, “Rock the Slut Vote” is now aiming to “diffuse” the offensive term, Emry said. Taking a vein from comedian Jeff Foxworthy and his “You might be a Redneck if…” jokes, Emry’s website gives visitors 22 reasons why “You might be a slut,” including “if you’ve ever used contraception” or “if you’re still downloading Dixie Chicks music” or “if you don’t go to church.”

    The site aims to “re-appropriate” the word “slut” so that Limbaugh and other Republicans cannot use it to “bully and silence women,” Emry said. It’s really about taking the power away from that word more than it is about Rush Limbaugh,” she said. “He gave the word the notoriety but we are trying to take it back.” {The word was used to silence women, really Emry? The word was used to label behavior and immorality!]

    Emry said the “Rush Limbaugh mess” coupled with the Susan G. Komen Foundation’s decision to cut Planned Parenthood funding and recent efforts in state Legislatures to restrict access to abortions and contraceptives “compelled” her to create the site after 56 years on the political sidelines. [Does anyone believe she has been on the sidelines – like Fluke has, no doubt!]

    http://news.yahoo.com/sluts-unite-against-republicans-rush-limbaugh-100132902–abc-news-politics.html

    • Sluts will line up to join!

      What total idiots. If you’ve ever used contraception you’re a slut?

      I’m thinking that Fluke (rhymes with f***; seriously, it does) has NEVER used contraception HERSELF, having never needed it. It just doesn’t work that way in her world. She wouldn’t be using condoms. What for? Bananas?

      This whole LIE they constantly tell about 98% of Catholic women having used contraception is just that–a LIE. They looked at a small sample of women aged 15-44. And of these, 15% said they used NO contraception or “withdrawal” which is not artificial birth control. So right off, their stat HAS TO BE WRONG. 15 from 100 equals 85.

      They also include women if once in their lives a man used a condom. The Church does allow for condom use to prevent STDs. So is that “birth control”? They’re just lying with statistics, as usual. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-claim-that-98-percent-of-catholic-women-use-contraception-a-media-foul/2012/02/16/gIQAkPeqIR_blog.html

      I love their logic. They need to own the word slut. Well, they can have it. If it fits …

      But their logic says that the word is used to bully and silence women. Is that wrong? If so, then why are THEY so quick to label us “birthers” or “racists” or “bigots” or to bully and silence people who, for example, like to drink soda, smoke cigarettes, own guns, drive SUVs, wear furs, or disbelieve in their fake sciences like “global warming”? They use words to bully and silence people ALL THE TIME. When they cease and desist, then perhaps others will consider doing the same. As you said, Bridgette, the word exists to label and hopefully decrease slut behavior, which IS detrimental to society, no matter what these bozos like Fluk believe. (Left off the e on purpose; helps with pronunciation.)

      She can go Fluk …

      • Love your last sentence! Made me laugh out loud! This can be more fun to ridicule than Attack Watch!

        I can’t wait to see the list of Slut’s names..! Can you imagine if Rush brings this up again and what he can do to them! Democratic sluts are Illogical fools! Tow the party line ..be a slut! Think of the bumper stickers! Honk.. if you’re a Slut Democrat ! Date a Slut – Add website…com.

  12. Not sure about any ‘surprise’ but Gov. Scott Walker has survived the recall election in WI, even though some precincts were reporting *117%* voter turnout and the thugs were shipping ‘voters’ in from MN to cast (illegal) ballots.

    This does not bode well for barky and his thugs. It will be interesting to see if there is indeed any ‘surprise’ come November….

    • Oh, good news, SueK. Thanks. I forgot to look again! This is HUGE for us. With all their cheating and Chicago and union thuggery, Walker survives. Great.

      • You’re welcome, Miri; I was nervously watching the election returns come in tonight. The race was called with only 24% of the precincts reporting.

        Union thuggery; yes. I think that this race will have implications far beyond WI; their back has been broken…now, to get the coffin and some nails. It’s only a matter of time. I think I see one of the dominoes rocking dangerously, don’t you? 🙂

        • Good one! Nail down that lid. Stick a fork in them first! Or maybe I should say a STAKE. Make sure they NEVER rise again.

        • Dana Loesch has a good take on the results: Another TEA PARTY VICTORY. And what’s heartening is that she touts their “ground game” for getting out the votes. One thing we can all do for November is help with that effort. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/05/loesch-wi-recall-a-tea-party-victory?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+6%2C+2012&utm_campaign=Breitbart+News+Round+Up%2C+June+6%2C+2012&utm_term=More

          • btw, the media already have their talking points on this win: They’re saying Walker won because of all the REPUBLICAN AND CONSERVATIVE MONEY poured into Wisconsin. They downplay or don’t even report the UNION MONEY and the SOROS MONEY and the PROGRESSIVE MONEY plus the busloads of bogus voters and union thugs and DemoncRAT lawyers who poured into the state to help STEAL THE ELECTION, if they could.

            Citizens United is going to be one of their major themes. The EVIL conservatives with all their Wall Street One-percenter money will steal elections, when the truth is the exact opposite. When has the lamestream EVER reported on Soros’s “Secretary of State Project”?

            Have you heard their latest triangulation meme? Because they know that the worst that Romney might say about COMMUNIST OBAMA is that he wants “European-style socialism”, they’re already saying that ROMNEY wants to emulate those failed “European austerity” programs. What absolute lying tools. And they think Americans are THAT STUPID that we will fall for it and not see through them.

            • While the DOJ is in Wisconsin to make sure no illegal aliens, felons, or bogus voters from other states are prevented from illegally voting, will they bother to investigate and prosecute EVERY ONE OF THESE DEATH THREATS AGAINST WALKER? Will the lamestream bother to REPORT THEM ALL?

              http://twitchy.com/2012/06/06/kill-scott-walker-angry-libs-flood-twitter-with-death-threats-after-wisconsin-recall-defeat/

              Why are they so brazen? Why are they so sure they will not be found out and sent to prison? It HAS TO BE A FELONY to threaten the life of a sitting governor. A SERIOUS felony.

              Will they be visited by the FBI or even local authorities? Or, if Walker has the State Police investigate, will the lamestream call him a sore winner? Wait for it! Just read that stuff; it’s chilling.

              OMG. If it’s for real, the last one is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz saying this is “divisive” and “offensive” and “wrong.” Can she say CRIMINAL and a FELONY? Maybe she’s worried about losing these “voters” after they’re convicted. Every vote counts. Even illegal ones.

            • I was right about the talking points handed to the media. Gateway Pundit reports: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/06/hah-obama-camp-on-last-nights-thumping-a-strong-message-to-governor-walker/

              “The Obama Campaign sent this message to supporters following last night’s thumping.

              “While tonight’s outcome was not what we had hoped for – no one can dispute the strong message sent to Governor Walker. Hundreds of thousands of Wisconsinites from all walks of life took a stand against the politics of division and against the flood of secret and corporate money spent on behalf of Scott Walker, which amounted to a massive spending gap of more than $31 million to $4 million.””

              When I read this morning, embedded in a supposed NEWS story, how so much money poured in to basically buy the governorship for Walker (with NO MENTION of all the Soros money, union money, thugs, and lawyers for the DemoncRATS), I knew they got their “story” from the WH. Tools. It’s all they are. STATE-RUN, PRAVDA-like TOOLS.

              In the story, also, and in this WH statement, Walker is blamed for the divisiveness and partisanship, when he was LEGALLY ELECTED and the DemoncRATS and Union THUGS are the ones who wasted $18 million of taxpayer money on this recall attempt.

              WHO CAUSED THE DIVISION? THEY DID. THEY OUGHT TO HAVE HONORED THE FIRST CHOICE OF THE PEOPLE OF WISCONSIN, WHO LEGALLY ELECTED WALKER IN 2008. This is what they tell us about OBAMA and the big difference is that WALKER is eligible and he won without CHEATING.

              A perfect example of how they LIE: Obama’s statement claims Barrett was outspent $31 million to $4 million. The truth:

              http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/05/ignore-the-spin-wisconsin-was-a-disaster-for-democrats-and-president-obama/

              “The day before the recall, Wisconsin’s MacIver Institute illustrated just how much money Big Labor has spent: more than $21 million.”

              Add the $4 million they admit to and you already have $25 million to the $31 million they claim Walker’s forces spent. No doubt, that number was inflated by any means necessary. http://www.maciverinstitute.com/2012/06/big-labor-recall-total-to-exceed-20-million/ That shows you the KNOWN sources of the DemoncRAT money.

      • Link found in comment left at GP:
        “Not only was spending on last night’s election virtually identical for both parties and their backers, but in reality Democrats outspent Republicans by several million when the entire recall effort is taken into account. ”
        http://thekansascitian.blogspot.com/2012/06/democracy-alive-and-well-myth-of.html

  13. I can’t get my search engins to work…..Anybody else? I tried startingpage and startpage.

  14. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Yes, Kathy. Same problem tonight.

    • http://press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/465036.html

      battleground chicago. 1967. communists, SDS, chanting om

      “…By the next afternoon, Saturday, August 24, the first real indication of the trouble that lay ahead appeared. At Lincoln Park, as the first crowds began to assemble, a young college student asked one of the officers where the Yippies were. “Over there,” said the officer. “You can smell them.” The gathering was peaceful, with police watching from the periphery. Poet Allen Ginsberg was holding court in the center of the crowd, encouraging the gathering to join him in chanting “Om, om, om.” The chant, Ginsberg said, had the twin effect of calming and connecting people, enabling them to transcend present circumstances. While the chants went on, plainclothes police officers roamed the grounds looking for trouble, monitoring Yippie leaders, and trying to look inconspicuous. Patrolman Cal Noonan recalls their appearance: “The plainclothes guys were a hoot. They were just cops in casual clothes and there was no way they were fooling anyone. But we were watching them [demonstrators] as closely as we could, we wanted to be everywhere they were, and we were.”

      With the realization that gatherers did not have a permit to remain in the park after 11 P.M., tension began to build as afternoon turned to evening. Ginsberg and his group continued chanting until about 10:40 P.M. before rising to lead people out of the park in the hopes of avoiding a confrontation with police. Approximately 1,000 people had already left the area by that time. Ginsberg led all but a couple of hundred out of the park. Encouraged by Yippie leaders and others not to make a stand before the convention even began, the majority of the crowd dissipated prior to the 11 P.M . curfew leaving only about 200 hardcore gatherers. Police soon moved in. With motorcycles in the lead, they cleared the park, and in the process they arrested eleven people for failing to disperse. Although there was little trouble in the park that night, a more surprising development occurred on the streets outside. The bulk of the crowd that had alread moved several blocks away from the park, without provocation, suddenly began to run toward Wells Street—the main street in Old Town-yelling “Peace now! Peace now! Peace now!” Some of the Saturday night throngs, mostly young Chicagoans with both long and short hair-soon joined them. Drivers in their cars honked their horns and displayed the peace sign out their windows. Even with the large crowd in the middle of the street, the assemblage did not rock cars or break windows. Indeed observers described the spontaneous demonstration as a peaceful march of citizens in their own city or a “joyful and exuberant release from the tension of the day.” The crowd moved unmolested by police for ten blocks down the middle ofthe street until officers, apparently caught offguard, caught up to the end ofthe parade to make a small number of arrests. When the bulk of the crowd realized that they had gained the attention of police, some yelled, “Get back on the sidewalk! Don’t give the pigs a chance to bust you! This is only the beginning.” Marchers quickly blended into the evening and into the regular crowds on the sidewalks. The march evaporated as quickly as it began.

      The spontaneous march, however, reverberated throughout police ranks. Officer Ronald Lardo remembers it well. “We caught major shit for that, let me tell you. That Old Town shit, well, we heard about that that night and the next day before our shifts began. We were reamed out. The word was that there was not going to be any people marching down the middle of the street anywhere stopping traffic, peaceful or not. Word was it didn’t matter. Disperse everyone, no matter who they were, quick and sure, no screwing around. No Mr.NiceGuy.” Other cops such as Milt Brower, said that the Old Town episode sent shock waves through the department. “We had been hearing for weeks how crowd control was everything, and then before the convention even began, while we were napping on that nice Saturday night, a damn march began right there in the main street, stopping traffic, and the press is there taking photos. I think that the reason shit hit the fan was that one of those photos made its way to someone at city hall, or Daley’s desk, and someone had a fucking conniption, and it went down the food chain. From then on, we were going to be there before they were and if they stepped onto the street we were going to knock them all the way back on or else. We were not going to wait for the crowds to pour in and overwhelm us.”

    • That “ohm-ing” is just plain weird. Creepy. Grates on the nerves and not one bit soothing. Almost like it is a technique to put people on edge and aggressive but disguised under peaceful contemplation and removing one self to a peaceful plane or something!

  15. http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302031/obamas-third-party-history-stanley-kurtz#

    Kurtz has the goods on Barry to PROVE beyond any doubt and obfuscation that Barry DID BELONG TO the SOCIALIST New Party in the mid-90s. He and his minions outright LIED about it and Kurtz opines that’s also why they lied about his ties to ACORN, because to investigate ACORN would show the proof that he belonged to and ran as a candidate of the New Party.

    “Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

    Minutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New Party’s Chicago chapter read as follows:

    ‘Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party “Candidate Contract” and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party'”

    • “RW/RBO wrote about Sen. Barack O’bomb’em’s New Party-ACORN ties in April 2008”

      “Today, NRO’s Stanley Kurtz published another confirmation regarding Barack Obama’s membership in the Marxist ACORN-connected New Party that he found in the “updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society [which] now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party”:”

      http://rbo2.com/2012/06/07/rwrbo-wrote-about-sen-barack-obombems-new-party-acorn-ties-in-april-2008/

      • There are good links in those articles. It’s good to review the past and see what’s developed since then. So we were right, huh? A VAST left-wing conspiracy. If they outright LIED and covered up his New Party connections and his connections to Ayers and ACORN, then how hard is it to believe that they also LIED ABOUT HIS INELIGIBILITY? You KNOW they did. AND SO, I MIGHT ADD, DID HILLARY. She’s in on the conspiracy. AS GUILTY as Pelosi and the rest.

  16. The Hermanator is back and he agrees with us: Barry is intent on destroying the capitalistic system in the USA.

  17. Very interesting information. You are spot on. Thank you for the time you took to research these curious inconsistencies and mysteries!

  18. http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/06/12/wall-street-insider-this-is-the-true-story-of-the-obama-white-house/

    I wish I was still a little skeptical about the WSI and WHI stories…but I think I’m convinced now and it’s frightening.

  19. Thank you for all the work you have done here. I’m also waiting with baited breath for the other shoe to drop before the November election; that is, if there is an election.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s