Obama Attorneys Want to Suppress Evidence from New Jersey Ballot Challenge!

Posted by Bridgette

Oh, What a Tangled Web They Weave

When They Practice to Deceive!



Cmdr. Charles Kerchner  reported on his blog today:

“I heard this morning that the Obama lawyers are trying to suppress the videos of the NJ Obama Ballot Access Challenge public hearing.  So I called and spoke with Attorney Mario Apuzzo,  and he confirmed that Obama’s lawyers have called him and told him they are planning to take legal action to get the videos of the NJ Ballot Access Challenge Public Hearing pulled and suppressed.

What is the Obama side ashamed of and doesn’t want the world to see.  Could it be that their Obama “emperor has no clothing on”, i.e., has no known conclusively proven true legal identity clothing/papers to show the world which Attorney Mario Apuzzo forced them to admit to and stipulate to in the NJ public hearing?

Obama’s side obviously does not want people to see this video. Watch it yourself at the below links and learn why.

In these videos, the Obama side even wants to allow Mickey Mouse to run for President. To Obama and his lawyers the U.S. Constitution and presidential eligibility clause in Article II is a joke.  You can see that in Part II at about 40 minutes into that segment.  It was interesting that Obama’s lawyer chose and mentioned Mickey Mouse running for President,  and making a mockery of the election process in her statements in the hearing as Mickey Mouse was a contributor to Obama’s campaign in 2008 as part of the untraceable debit and credit card contributions that Obama accepted online, a good chunk of it alleged to have been illegally provided to Obama operatives from foreign sources.

Obama’s attorney did not wish the proceedings video taped.  It has been learned from sources who recorded these videos with the court’s permission under NJ law that Obama’s lawyer did not want the hearing video taped and she tried before the start of the public hearing to get the cameras removed. However under NJ state law, video taping of public hearings is permitted.  Now the Obama legal team wants to suppress these videos.”

See this channel link for the videos of this public hearing and/or via the other embedded links below here.


Videos that the Obama Attorneys Want Suppressed!

Mario Apuzzo at NJ Ballot Challenge Hearing – Part One

Mario Apuzzo at NJ Ballot Challenge Hearing – Part Two

Mario Apuzzo at NJ Ballot Challenge Hearing  – Part Three

Save copies if you can!

Updates as more information becomes available!


“A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.”

~Winston Churchill.


47 responses to “Obama Attorneys Want to Suppress Evidence from New Jersey Ballot Challenge!

  1. Under Gordo’s PC Hints – How to save a copy of a YouTube video so if it gets removed or suppressed, there are still copies! Obama can perhaps force Apuzzo to suppress them, but they would have to come after thousands of us if we keep copies. It was a public hearing, so it will be interesting to see how the Obama attorneys challenge NJ laws to suppress the videos.

    GORDO | March 19, 2012 at 9:31 am

    “Free YouTube Download”

    *** BE VERY CAREFUL during installation – READ – you don’t want to install ‘junk’ along with the downloader. ***

    Please see the URL below to read all of the instructions!

  2. They realize that clips from those videos of Obama’s attorney admitting that he’s NEVER produced authentic documents to any court will make a dyn-o-mite anti-Obama campaign ad. I said the day I saw it that somebody with video splicing expertise needs to make a YouTube with these special clips. Then we can email everybody the link. His own lawyer admits he’s never presented an authentic document. And that it’s “irrelevant”.

  3. CDR Kerchner (Ret)’s Blog:

    “Obama lawyer Angelo Genova tries to suppress and intimidate NJ conservative press and citizen journalists — Original Obama attorney Alexandra Hill, the Mickey Mouse attributer, removed from Obama NJ eligibility case. Head of Obama’s NJ law firm Angelo Genova now taking over the case”



      “Apuzzo received a call from a man identifying himself as Angelo Genova, the lead partner of Genova, Burns, Giantomasi and Webster. Genova was agitated and almost overwrought. He demanded to know why Apuzzo had videotaped the proceedings (a thing Apuzzo did not do), and then said that he would “move to strike the video from the record.” Genova also said that:

      Alexandra M. Hill is not working on the case of Purpura and Moran v. Obama any longer. Angelo Genova has taken that case over and is handling it personally.

      Death threats have come to the firm. Apuzzo told CNAV that Ms. Hill was the main target of these threats. Billy Baer also talked to Apuzzo, after CNAV called Dan Haggerty for comment. Apuzzo apparently told Baer that Genova never made clear whether the threatening person was threatening Ms. Hill alone or “the firm in general,” whatever that might mean.

      Apuzzo offered to Genova to condemn the threats for the record, on his blog. Genova hastily declined. He then dwelt at length on the making of the video or videos and accused Apuzzo of making them without the court’s permission.”


      • Billy Baer is a really good voice, solid, contemporary and a patriot. i hope this is the same Billy. a terrific legal mind. thoughtful debater. wow.

        • and lets never ever forget the names Kerchner and Apuzzo. They are on the record in the SCOTUS. dismissed without comment, 21st Century.

          we witnessed the trample

        • The ‘Baer Haggerty Offensive’ Radio Show with special guest CDR Kerchner (Ret) – Wed 11 Apr 2012


          [audio src="http://www.kerchner.com/audio/baerhaggertyoffensiveshowwithcdrkerchner11Apr2012.mp3" /]


          • They simply didn’t think about media recording the hearing because they thought no media would cover it. Thank goodness for NJ law. But next time, they’ll just ask for a “waiver” and probably will get one.

            From WND’s story:

            ““What is emerging in the various state legal challenges to including President Obama on the presidential ballot appears to be an attempt by the White House to divorce itself from the Obama long-form birth certificate released,” said Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Arizona Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s law enforcement investigation into Obama’s birth certificate and eligibility to be president. … “Instead of producing the birth certificate to the New Jersey secretary of state and arguing to Judge Masin that the document was legitimate, Obama’s legal counsel did everything she could to keep the document from coming into evidence. Why?” … Hill affirmed to Masin in response to a direct question from the bench that Obama’s birth certificate had never been presented to the New Jersey secretary of state to establish his eligibility, and she affirmed that the Obama re-election campaign had no intention of doing so.

            At one point in the hearing, Masin, apparently agreeing with Hill’s argument, dramatically explained to Apuzzo that Obama’s birth certificate was not at issue in the case.

            “I have nothing before me that I can look at and can say, ‘Okay, this is what has been produced as his [Obama’s] birth certificate,’” the judge said from the bench.

            “There is nothing here,” he continued, referring to the birth certificate. “The campaign has not produced me anything, and I assume you’re not planning on doing that. The campaign hasn’t shown me anything on the Internet. There’s no birth certificate that has been presented to me – good, bad, indifferent, real, forged, certified, anything – it’s not here.””

            Exactly. Instead, they now seek to distance themselves by claiming it’s only a campaign ad, put up by the campaign. Not to be taken seriously by anyone. And yet, they don’t want We the People to KNOW that’s their “defense”, so they try to muffle any coverage of events and what their own lawyers say.

      • OH, this is getting good. So did they lie about the threats to Ms. Hill to cover for why a new law firm is taking over? Gee, are they worried? I guess they figured the judge was in the bag and the fix was in, so why waste money on hot shots? They didn’t count on video providing endless goodies for “birther” ads. Ok, so are they lying about the death threats or did they decline the condemnation by Apuzzo because THAT will bring lamestream attention to the case? This new lawyer sounds of the typical caliber of one of Obama’s thuggish lawyers. Threatening. Demeaning. Doesn’t have the facts straight. And of course, who’s threatening Hill? Implied that it’s “birthers”, when, imho, more likely it’s insane clown possee obots.

      • thanks, Gordo. i met him at TL’s Court Martial. (he’s funny, too)

      • Alexandra M. Hill:

        “Ms. Hill received her Juris Doctor from Georgetown University Law Center in 2011 … Ms. Hill served as an intern for the Camden County Democrat Committee.

        Practice areas:

        – Commercial Real Estate, Redevelopment & Environmental Law
        – Corporate Political Activity Law”


  4. Obama Ate Dog – For Special Powers …Update: Here’s Audio
    Mitt Romney took his dog on trips. Obama ate them.
    April 18, 2012

    Jim Treacher broke the the sad news yesterday that Mr. Wonderful eats dogs.

    With Lolo, I learned how to eat small green chill peppers raw with dinner (plenty of rice), and, away from the dinner table, I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (tougher), and roasted grasshopper (crunchy). Like many Indonesians, Lolo followed a brand of Islam that could make room for the remnants of more ancient animist and Hindu faiths. He explained that a man took on the powers of whatever he ate: One day soon, he promised, he would bring home a piece of tiger meat for us to share.”

    UPDATE: (By Andrea Ryan) Thank goodness our president didn’t roll over before the Saudi King. Or pee on the Japanese Emperor’s rug.


  5. Update on the Purpura and Moran New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection
    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    April 10, 2012 Updated April 14, 2012 Snips

    Mr. Obama was represented by Alexandra Hill of the firm of Genova, Burn & Giantomasi of Newark, New Jersey.

    We argued that Mr. Obama has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that he has not presented any evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State showing who he is and that he was born in the United States. We also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

    Obama’s attorney made a motion to dismiss the Objection in its entirety. She argued that it was not relevant to being placed on the ballot whether Mr. Obama is a “natural born Citizen,” where he was born, and whether he was born to U.S. citizen parents. She said that no law in New Jersey obligated him to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot. We argued that Mr. Obama under the Constitution has to be a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that under New Jersey law (the state constitution, statutes, and case law), Mr. Obama must show that he is qualified for the office he wishes to occupy and that includes showing that he is a “natural born Citizen,” which includes presenting evidence of who he is, where he was born, and that he was born to two U.S. citizen parents. We argued that the Secretary of State has a constitutional obligation not to place any ineligible candidates on the election ballot. Judge Masin denied Obama’s motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.
    Upon my request that she so stipulate, Obama’s lawyer agreed during the trial that there was absolutely no evidence before the court as to who Obama is or where he was born, including excluding from evidence the internet image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth he released on April 27, 2011. The ALJ confirmed that to be the case. [This is probably what the Obama attorneys want stricken from the record and in the video!]
    The next step is an appeal directly to the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division.


  6. Showing signs of desparation. It’s becoming ridiculous. Blatant fraud.

    • Listening to the short-video of the most ridiculous part of the hearing that is linked from Kerchner’s blog, I heard a new line. Didn’t catch it before. Hill says that “Obama for America” doesn’t have to produce proof. Why does she mention his campaign instead of HIM?

      • that’s because its a ballot challenge, so it’s about getting him on the ballot as a nominee. His current position is not directly rlevant to the hearing. His nomination is run by his campaign, so his campaign is “who” has to deal with the whole thing.

  7. Bo is scared of Barky because he has doggy on his breath.

  8. http://irateirishman.com/blog/?p=12399 …. alexandra hill + tons more… interesting… education… getting me up to speed…
    open… (fact-box top page)100 facts & 1 lie … (#1&2) Mlk 75-77 + 79 + 82-84

  9. Diana West:

    “Is Obama disowning online birth certificate?”


    • thanks, Gordo.

      what did Savannah Guthrie actually touch with a raised seal?
      what exactly did judith corley courtier to the Oval Office…

      it all began a year ago and was promulgated live on TV … what was?

  10. Jerome Corsi:

    “Obama attorney: ‘Mickey Mouse’ could be on ballot”

    “Mickey Mouse could be placed as a candidate on the New Jersey Democratic Party presidential primary ballot, an attorney representing Barack Obama argued in court to support her claim that state law does not require Obama to prove he is eligible.

    What was clear viewing the three-hour hearing was that Hill waged a battle throughout to prevent being forced to submit the Obama birth certificate into evidence.”

    [videos at link]


    • “At the hearing before New Jersey Administrative Law Judge Jeff S. Masin April 10, Hill maneuvered to avoid having to enter into evidence Obama’s long-form birth certificate the White House released nearly a year ago as proof Obama was born in Hawaii. By doing so, Hill was able to block Apuzzo’s expert witness from testifying in person at the hearing that the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House was inherently unreliable because it was an electronic file that demonstrated electronic manipulation.”

      But she basically admitted as much. A digital image on the Internet is proof of NOTHING.

  11. Fed Court: Eligibility Question “Important and Not Trivial”

    Last week I reminded you that one of our Certification Class Action lawsuits was filed in State court in Tennessee, and that that case had been “removed” to Federal court by the defendants. I also told you that LLF had filed a motion to remand the case back to the State court. Last Friday the Federal court denied our motion.

    While we’re disappointed that the Court denied our motion, there is some good news that came along with the denial. In its 12-page opinion the Court made several very positive statements about our case. Here are some quotes:

    “The Court finds that the federal question presented, the meaning of the phrase ‘natural born citizen’ as a qualification for the Presidency set out in Article II of the Constitution, is important and not trivial.”

    “The issue of whether President Obama is constitutionally qualified to run for the Presidency is certainly substantial.”

    “It is clear that the stated federal issue of President Obama’s qualifications for the office are ‘actually disputed and substantial.’”

    “It is also clear that there will be a legal dispute over the Constitution’s definition of ‘natural born citizen’ and the Supreme Court’s decision in Minor.”

    The Court’s statements strongly imply that it has already decided many of the issues that usually lead to procedural dismissals, and that it has decided them in our favor. While it is certainly dangerous to read too much into such an opinion, the statements from this Federal court are encouraging. The Court appears to understand the most critical issues presented by our complaint.

    The Tennessee Democratic Party, the Democratic National Committee, and the DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz have already filed motions to dismiss our case. LLF will be filing our opposition to these motions within the next two weeks. We will post our filings as soon as they are filed.

    As you know, LLF is taking several simultaneous approaches to addressing the eligibility issue. Our lawsuits are moving forward through the various courts. Please continue to help us by spreading the word about LLF and donating to support our efforts.

    For Liberty,
    Van Irion,


  12. Expert: This is what ‘natural born citizen’ means!
    Herb Titus, a Constitutional scholar, reviews criteria, reasons and history, on Aaron Klein’s
    radio program.

    Apr. 22

    What it is most like, God help us, is the Soviet Union, where history was rewritten, laws subverted or changed in support of any whim of the ruling class. It’s America’s Animal Farm where you don’t remember what you remember and the law isn’t what you think it is, its what we tell you it is.

    It is impossible to equate what is happening here in NJ and across this country to anything else. The Secretary of State, arguably the leading law enforcement official, has clearly stated, she will not enforce the Constitution or the election laws of NJ.

    and the beat goes on…..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s