The Artistically Created Obama – “Man-made” Photos!

©Bridgette@WTPOTUS 2012

“Genius” Photo-shoppers Works of Art!

 A composite of Obama’s ears from multiple photos. 

Does Barack, Barry, or Steve  decide which ears to wear each day like he chooses his shirt or slacks?  No wonder he can’t hear We the People!    The puppet makers think we are deaf,  dumb and  really blind!  How many “Barack Obamas” are there?  This is very concerning to find photos that are supposed to be Barack, yet  when they are compared, the ears do not match those of the person pretending to be the president.   It is more than obvious that Obama is a created man.

Below are new, previously unseen by us,  photographs that were shown in a campaign video promoting Barack Obama by Politicstv on Aug 28, 2008.    Some screen prints were made to better  view these photos and are added to our collection of mugshots.  Would you be surprised that the promoters used photo-shopped pictures while trying to sell their candidate?  They expected to continue duping the public by creating a falsified history for the unknown man who now uses and abuses the address of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D.C.

Following are photos from that video. They aren’t as clear as they might be if an original, but you can see how these pictures were reworked or created by their famous photo-shoppers to make them palatable and believable.  This was a slick marketing video for an unworthy and ineligible candidate.

The photos were lightened so you can see the obvious changes that were made to them.  They add body parts including eyes, ears, hair, arms, and legs to change the appearances of the photos.  Instead of  “sleight of hand” we see “sleight of photos”!

The “Golden Boy” and his grandfather, Stanley Dunham

Such a “golden boy”!  Was a bronzed statue made of him?    Look at his teeth.  The photo-shoppers always fix the teeth.  They show as  a white line instead of separate teeth.     Notice the extremely squared chin that Obama now has.  The white you see on Gramps is where they “enhanced”  his face.  He also has a very pointed head and if you draw an imaginary line across his hairline, it appears he has 2 1/2 – 3 inches of hair on top of his head!

4

Madelyn Payne Dunham and Stanley A. Dunham

Madelyn had her head placed on someone else’s body.  For a petite woman, she became seriously overweight!  Note the discoloration at the V in her neckline and the dark shadows under her neck.    Now Stanley had a tough time putting those glasses on his face…they don’t seem to fit his schnozzola.  I guess he needed glasses to see that his glasses were out of kilter. It really appears they put his face on someone else’s  head for this photo.  Notice the straight lines on both cheeks in front of the ears and the discoloration.   Madelyn’s right ear was added as well.  In fact, the more I look at her, she looks like a man with a flat top!  Her nose was fixed also.

A close up to show how they changed Stanley’s nose and mouth.

4
4

Barack Obama as a kid

The return of the widow’s peak!   He has the black chest of his father and the light face of his mother.   His eyes were fixed – they aren’t  symmetrical  if you look closely.  There is no white showing equally in his eyes.   Once again, they worked on those  teeth.   There was also some work done on his right ear. Why would the inside of his shirt collar be so dirty?

4

Looks Real from a Distance!

Barack, Ann Dunham and little child, perhaps it is supposed to be Maya.

This is a really good example of photo-shopping at its worst.  Note the gloved hand on Barack’s arm.  His arm lost a hand, and it appears as a stump.   They gave him an arm to put under his chin, and they added  some  slacks to his mother.   A bow in Maya’s hair is so cute!  Note there is no definition to Barack’s shirt or whatever it is that is totally black.   Sleeveless?

4

In this photo, the little boy was placed into the setting.  On the left side notice how the railing just ends!  He received a new right hand to place on that railing too.   He is in sunlight, yet the background is all black except for the lovely waterfalls.

4

The boy with two faces! Look closely.

Another hodge podge of a photo.  You can see they gave him a jacket and a new hand.  If you can enlarge the photo, you will see two totally different faces.  I guess that really defines him though, don’t you think?   Are you seeing how they continue to dupe the public?

4

They gave Ann a Smile!

4

Ann and Barack

Notice Ann’s porcelain arm and how they filled in all the white area around the person that is supposed to be Barack.   Ann’s night time mask is very attractive too!  Or is that a surgical mask she is wearing?  Was it a veil before they gave her a face?  They even gave her some legs and knees.  To bad the hands and legs don’t match in skin color.

Barack has no separate teeth showing in this photo so it appears he has a  mouthful of cotton.    That is a fake hand on his shoulder, but it went out of focus when the photo was enlarged.  It appears that Barack is tucked against his mother, but if you look by their legs, you will see a dangling black hand.   His other hand looks like a crab’s claw.  Barack has a  nice new white shirt that shows no creases or definition anywhere.  I guess it was heavily starched!

4

It doesn’t show up well in these photos, but it is supposed to be Ann’s  hand that is placed on his shoulder.  Note the color differences between Ann’s legs, right arm and hand, and her dangling hand on Barack’s shoulder.

4

Do you recognize Ann’s face?  It is the well worn face that was used in the Lolo, Ann, Barack and Maya family group photo.  You know the one where they are all sitting on a settee?  The photo-shopper separately moved the photo of Barack up to make it appear that he is sitting right next to her on the arm of the settee.

My, my, my what long arms Barack has.  He reached all the way around his mother to hold her.  His perfect little fingernails seem to be painted white!  I guess  in this photo instead of a black chest,  he has a white one.   That white band at his neckline is not a stripe in his shirt.    Don’t you  love his new ears!   And the head bone is connected to the neck bone!

They gave  Ann  some hands to  fold  in her lap also instead of holding the baby.   Barack’s  got some pretty hefty legs, but Ann’s are hidden under her  new black dress.   Why is it that Ann has no cheek bones or  no frown lines?  In fact her eyes don’t  look aligned either.     Did they give her ears to match her son’s infamous ones?   Don’t we wish we could see her real hair do rather than the black mane she has in this photo.

4

Lolo Soetoro, Ann D. O.  Soetoro, Maya Soetoro, Barry Soetoro or Soebarka

4

Barack and Michelle Obama

Aren’t they just birds of a feather?  Barack’s hand unluckily fell from the sky and landed right on Michelle’s shoulder.  Ker plop!   He totally lost the right side of his face in this picture, while some of Michelle’s is showing.  Very strange lighting for this to happen in a photo!  Is Barack’s left  hand really growing out of the couch?

4

Barack and Michelle

Yellow chest for Barack, reddish lips, and black eyes.   Aren’t his lips more purple?      For Michelle, a beautiful white toothed smile.   Do they make dentures that appear as one flat line?  I guess they didn’t want Barack to have teeth in this photo nor his mole.   At what age did that mole start growing?

4

The hand from out of no where…in fact there is another hand under that hand on her shoulder.  Look at the finger tips..there are 8!  No it isn’t a shadow.  Why is there black between his index and third finger  and his thumb and index finger?  The chair is not black.   Barack is  wearing a new heavily starched white shirt that they gave him, or else they added his head to a body and the shirt!    Look at his right sleeve that is next to Michelle’s shoulder.  What kind of animal would eat a shirt?

To finish off Michelle’s look, some new ear rings.  They are so happy and you can tell by their pearly whites.  Do they both wear a special mouth retainer? Above Barack’s wristwatch is an oval shape.  It should be the color of the wall, don’t you think?   Note he is wearing his wrist watch on his left arm… highly unusual for a lefty.   Our perceptive readers note that his watch may appear on either arm.

Wedding Photo?

4

What can we say?   Nice bib Barack!  The angle of his body is so peculiar.  He is leaning one way and his head is tilted the other way.   It appears to be a cut-out of Michelle’s head.  Otherwise,  why is the coloring beneath her chin and by her neck dark when it should be the color of the wall?  Behind her head is a light colored band where it should be blending into Barack’s coat.  Her hair is black, and so is his jacket.

4

 Black arms and golden face!  Two toned Barack!   Another head stuck into someone else’s body.    Beady eyes with those white teeth, mmm mmm mmm.  The snarly smile doesn’t become who ever this is.   The photo of this man was dropped into a picture of a skyline.

4

Ann Dunham

The shadowing of this photo of Ann is very strange.  Her eyes are looking at the ground, but they look like hollows in a skeleton.   They added some chin and  monkeyed with her nose.  Why her neck is so darkly shadowed is a question.  Usually, the neck is dark when they are trying to make the marks disappear when attaching a head to a body.   Her clavicle bones certainly are prominent on her body.  What happened to her hair?  That long mane of hair has disappeared, and it appears she has none.

#######

5

The following are from screen prints that I made of photos shown by Dr. John Drew in his video  “First Impressions of a Young Barack Obama at
Occidental College.”   It is unknown if some of these were photos  were in his possession from the time he went to Occidental with Barack.   The first photos look like those from a collection done by the Occidental student who was majoring in photograph. She thought Barry was so handsome that she had to capture his essence in photos.

Barack Obama at Occidental – Drugged?

4

Stoned, drugged up on marijuana or another substance or dorked on cocaine.   The snort of the smoke breathing dragon!

4

The question is answered.  It is smoke that is circling his head.  It wasn’t a Mary incident!  Again,  he appears to be  enjoying the moment or hours  of drug induced ecstasy.

4

Coming out of a drugged stupor?

A watch on one hand and a bracelet on another.   Nice Afro!

4

Taking a walk with his GQ magazine in hand.

4

He looks a little Chinese in this photo.

4

  I did a little doctoring so you could see this better. The mole is present.

4

A very square chin.  The photo appears a little distorted.

4

So Smug!  Extremely square face and broad nose.  His ears are closer to his head than  in photos of him now.  The right side of his forehead shows a particular hair loss or sparse growth that was seen in baby photos.  There is no widow’s peak.  Remember that meme how he was so poor. So poor that he owned leather coats, and a even a suit.

4

Keeping your “friends” close, really close.

Who is this man that is within kissing distance?  It is Highly unusual for two male heterosexuals to get this close.

4

Who is that man? It’s Cuba Gooding, Jr.

More touchy, feely  stuff.

4

Barack and Joe Biden sharing a quiet moment!

4

This photo collection will end on this note where our usurping, undocumented, president and vice president laugh about the historical con game that was played on the American public.    Citizens were duped by photo-shopped pictures of a phony president along with those of his created family and his own background.

4

Questions remain, Who is he and where did he come from?

Indeed, he is a work of art!

144 responses to “The Artistically Created Obama – “Man-made” Photos!

  1. It IS an excellent composite. Bridgette downloaded a new photo program from one of Gordo’s links, so we have Gordo to thank, too, for this great post! Good job, Bridgette. We’re learning. Before long, we’ll be expert enough to get jobs in the administration. WE’D pass a background check and WE’D have the documents to back up our I-9s. :)

  2. Finally got into here by pressing comments instead of continue.
    The picture of the boy on some sort of railing (same as boy with two faces): Is that a black sleeved arm underneath the railing on HIS right side?

    • I don’t know what that is. In the text, Bridgette says part of the rail is missing. But now that I look at it again, it could be something behind him, between him and the rail. A paper bag? It’s not a shadow. Looks like other stuff there, behind him. When I first saw it, the entire background looked superimposed to me. Like when they film people in front of a blue screen and put the scenery into the background, later on. This is all contrived to lend credibility to that supposed “mainland” trip he made with his “mother” and “sister” when he was a kid. See Maya’s Mickey Mouse ears in a photo above that one? That’s to lend credibility about that all-American story about Mom taking the kids to Disneyland.

      • sorry to reply to this so late but the photo of barry on the arm of settee with Ann isn’t the settee….there is not back to the settee anymore behing Ann…yet that does look like the settee arm….Total photshop and her eyes look like there sliding off her face..

        • Ok. Fair enough. I just got accustomed to referring to that thing they sit on as a settee, especially since SAD looks like she was taken from one settee photo and plopped into that one. Whatever he’s sitting on, supposedly, looks like it’s impaling his leg.

          • I understand, but it’s the same block wall, the settee arm, and rigamortus ann with with her strange black dress who doesn’t look like she budged one inch from her previous photo on the settee. Just observing….don’t mind me. So much else to notice I guess it just hit me what I noticed. Poor Ann, she must be in morning in this photo with all that black .

          • She looks far too thin to BE Ann. Hourglass figure. When did SHE ever have one? Same thing Bridgette pointed out about MO. Head games AND body games. I really ought to try this for myself. I’ll just take my family photo album, find a better body on the Internet, and substitute it for mine in all the pics! Then posterity will point to me and say, “Isn’t she lovely? Isn’t she wonderful? Isn’t she precious?” Wait! What? Oh, yeah. That’s Stevie Wonder I’m quoting now. It’s a musical day, folks. Don’t mind me, alfy. :)

  3. The photo of Barry with Stan is obviously photoshopped. They added Stan to the photo. I’ve seen the one of Barry without Stan. The difference in lighting makes it truly obvious, although the videographer would probably say it’s a composite that wasn’t intended to be considered anything but.

    Poor Madelyn. They plopped her head on those fatter shoulders at such a bad angle. Did she have such terrible posture? That “forward head” problem? What a terrible job on her hair! And Stan’s right arm, the one next to her, looks drawn into the photo. Look at the crummy job filling in the background between his arm and his body. So fake. The “happy” couple.

    Speaking of that happy couple, the wedding photo of Barry and Moochelle is obviously faked. If somebody had the time, they’d probably find the original in some copy of Brides magazine. They look like models. The heads were replaced, and yes, at a bad angle again. Just try to put your body and your head into the position that Barry’s in. He’s not GUMBY!

    All they did was take someone else’s wedding pics (or a magazine photo spread of a pretend wedding) and photoshop the faces onto the bodies. Just like I did on the open thread, with my version of Cinderbarry.

  4. Here’s how you know the wedding photo is FAKE. Does it look REMOTELY like her dress? Or the flowers?

    Image. It’s all about image and the narrative and to make them celebrities on a par with iconic people like JFK, Jackie O, Princess Di, etc. The glitterati and the illuminati. Our betters. Born to RULE us. When will we ever get the message and BOW DOWN as he bows to the King of Saud?

    • Yes, it does look the same dress. She had zip-in sleeves that came off later in the day, supposedly. Read it somewhere. Emblama’s head on the ‘happy couple’ pic looks like a reversed head of the “couch with lover-but-tell-everyone-friend” picture.

      • Supposedly. Everything’s always supposedly because they rationalize after the fact. Whoever is lying on that couch ain’t Michelle. Too slim and the skirt is too flattish, no sleeves, AND it looks like it’s not all white. The brocade is pronounced and looks colored somewhat, although it’s a black and white photo. Which is odd because the group shots with the families are in color.

        Here’s another:

        And we needn’t say that all these photos have been fixed/photoshopped, in one way or another.

      • Here’s a bigger, more inclusive photo:

        • A professional photographer most likely would have eyed the one pant leg creased to make the one leg look like a peg. the model in this pic, whether Embalma or whoever knows to pull up the pant legs a bit when sitting down so as not to round out the knee area. This was even down in a collapsed moment. Strange.

          The white blob now shows as the scrunched veil. It is a very amateurish set up from a photographer. Michelle looks like she was propped up from being “laid out” in a casket!

        • i think the boutineir looks like its on the wrong lapel. Its usually is pinned above the heart. seeing it on him makes sense though. the face on the bride looks like it was shoved on. and i smell feet.

          • :) Good point about the flower. Even if it was stephanotis, it wouldn’t overcome the smell of dem dere feet.

            Say up in Harlem at a table for two,
            There were four of us,
            Me, your big feet and you.
            From your ankles up, I’d say you sure look sweet.
            From there down, there’s just too much feet.
            Yes, your feets too big.
            Don’t want ya, cause ya feets too big.
            Can’t use ya, cause ya feets too big.
            I really hate ya, cause ya feets too big.
            Da-dee-do-dah, wan-gah-da.
            Where’d you get ‘em?
            Nyah-da-dum!

            Your feets too big. And they stink, too.

      • This photo?

        Yes, it do look like the same expression, only he’s not smiling with Siddiqi. Brocade couch. Brocade gown.

    • This is one of my personal favorites with Obama’s puppet head. How rotund did Stanley Ann get to be? I don’t think MO ever had a waist that was tiny. Her figure now shows that she never had an hour glass figure in her life like this photo is trying to portray.

      • Look how fake that is. If SAD’s feet were really underneath MO’s gown, you’d see the fabric flowing over them. But you just see a perfect round circle of cloth. SAD was photoshopped in. Why can’t you see the fabric of SAD’s gold dress through MO’s veil? Is SAD standing on Barry’s foot? Ouch.

    • Hey, Dr. P.! Thanks for linking to us in your comment! Or did you mean to link to page 35 of your book? If so, it didn’t work! It goes to Bridgette’s post.

      btw, what do you think of her excellent work? I can swear that she’s been working on this post for weeks if not months, before you published your book, so it’s not like she was being a copycat or anything.

      One might say she’s your protege. Ha! HA! That’s a joke, Bridgette. :) Bridgette has been doing photo analysis here for years.

      So what’s your take on that lying on the couch, so whipped, wedding photo? Head games, as you call them. What say u?

  5. DR. JEROME CORSI
    ‘VERY CLOSE TO IDENTIFYING THE FORGER’

    http://www.tpath.org/

  6. http://www.tpath.org/current_headlines.html
    EXTRA! EXTRA! see baby photo of George Z and the
    Media “Distorters with an Agenda” ( a bunch of turds )
    TPLRSC …..The Survial & Rediness Program… P.S. were READY!!!
    in our lifetime? I think WTPOTUS etc. have done did it!
    Go Dr. J Corsi….. Sheriff JOE…. ORLY … & of course mr trump…

  7. http://www.tpath.org/PICS_n_TOONS.html
    seems like yesterday….
    everything on tpath.org is well work our spair time…

  8. I always thought it really was Mo with her feet up again…
    I guess Bo had a different…. FLOWER on BOTH…. sides of his lapel!

    • A flower on both sides or else he split the seams, but I don’t know how that would be possible for such a scrawny guy. Look closely at MO’s face. It’s not very flattering and really doesn’t look a lot like her, unless she had plastic surgery since then, which is possible. Barry himself has that strange, repaired harelip look. Notice how odd his upper lip and smile are? Something very odd is going on with these photos. Doesn’t the skirt of the dress look much less full than in the color photos of the wedding party? In the one with his mother, his head looks far too small. It’s a head game, in more ways than one.

  9. Sorry this has nothing to do with Obama’s ears, but i need to post this…

    White guy wanders into black neighborhood, gets beaten and stripped(video)

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0c0_1333571524

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=679_1332640868

  10. Mo’s skirt … way too short in photo.. when standing dragin the carpet for days… Yes, it’s a knock-off/mock-up. Veil is way shorter less fluffy. The printed skirt and her satin taffeta..no way. Bo shoes… shinny patent when off his feet? Yep it’s doctored… Google.. on R of page… play with open them largest. Same old shots…. Love Mo’s prom dress shot with the slit to the hip…nasty. (A card with 3 photos says)
    Love, Perseverance, Influence,First-Rate Wedding Dress for the First Lady
    I wonder when her title gets stripped what we she call herself?
    The trickery is cracking as we type. Folks are getting their mojo movin!
    The “WH Easter Prayer Breakfast” AGAIN was all about the “COVER UP”… I heard a “AMEN” Let me repeat! But take heart I HAVE over come the world! … that joke-ster is exposed.

  11. The traveling ears…. Have ears will travel. What more can we say?
    Oh … too bad he thought so little us us all…

  12. What a coincidence, out today from Reuters:
    The Obama administration on Tuesday said it was preparing to sue Arizona county sheriff Joe Arpaio and his department for violating civil rights laws by improperly targeting Latinos in a bid to crack down on illegal immigrants.
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/04/us-usa-immigration-arizona-idUSBRE83309F20120404

  13. His cheeks are looking like vertical blinds.
    Back at ya Berry…

  14. Site says Barry is merely shopping 4 votes….
    too transparent

  15. Greetings All,

    Could anyone here be so kind as to direct me to the exact location (Immigration Act) where it was determined that Stanley Ann Dunham was too young to confer citizenship on Barky. I can’t come up with where that came from. I am looking for the exact chapter and section. Thanks.

  16. It’s sweet when someone knows every single detail about you. Not because you constantly remind them, but because they pay attention.

  17. Thanks Miri, I will start going though them.

    From what I have been able to come up with, that fourteen and five only applied to persons born outside the US to one US citizen parent. Surely I am not looking in the right place.

    Did you happen to notice that the Georga Supreme Court kicked out Hatfield and Irion, with no stated reason, but set Orly Taitz for sometime in June?

    • I think that’s right. Only if he was born outside the US. I didn’t read all that. I have had the same questions about that claim. It seems that it all depends on the EXACT circumstances of his birth, which of course we don’t know. Some say she had to be a resident of the US (continuously?) for 5 years after the age of 14. So, if he was born overseas and his father was not a US citizen, then he’s disqualified because she wasn’t 19. I can look into it more tomorrow.

      I haven’t been keeping up very well with those cases. We did learn about Irion and Hatfield, but I didn’t know about Orly for June.

      • From “US Department of State” site:
        ———-
        “Birth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother”

        “A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth. The mother must be genetically related to the person in order to transmit U.S. citizenship.”

        http://travel.state.gov/law/citizenship/citizenship_5199.html
        ***********************
        [If SAD and BHO were married.]:

        “… this is the scenario that would apply if Obama was not born in the United States. Obama’s father was not a United States citizen. Obama can therefore only rely on his United States citizen mother to make him a “citizen of the United States at birth.” But as we can see from 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1401(g) (the only applicable statute), a mother had to be at least 19 years old when she gave birth to the child born abroad in order to transmit her United States citizenship to him. Obama’s mother, born on November 29, 1942, was 18 years old when she gave birth to Obama on August 4, 1961. She was 117 days short from being 19 years old. But she had to be at least 19 years old (14 years old plus 5 years of U.S. physical presence) to satisfy the legal requirement of Sec. 1401(g) (INA Section 301(g)). Therefore, Obama cannot benefit from Sec. 1401(g).

        Hence, if Obama was not born in the United States, under the Fourteenth Amendment he is neither a United States citizen by birth on United States soil nor one by naturalization.”

        http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/12/what-is-putative-president-obamas.html

        • From “US Department of State” site:
          ———-
          “Birth Abroad to One Citizen and One Alien Parent in Wedlock”

          “A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) of the INA provided the U.S. citizen parent was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for the time period required by the law applicable at the time of the child’s birth. … For birth between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen, is required for physical presence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child. The U.S. citizen parent must be genetically related to the child to transmit U.S. citizenship.”

          • Thanks for the input Gordo. All we have to do now is prove he wasn’t born in the USA. It really should be the other way around. He should have to prove that he was.

            Interesting, that the Georga Supreme Court didn’t throw Orly Taitz out with the others. Her case was the only one that brought up forgery and fraud. I wonder if they were listening to the Alabama justice that said Obama’s BC’s smelled like long-dead fish.

      • Did yu know that Ralph Johnson Bunche’s wife Ruth Ethel Harris Bunch had many, many organizations she was on the New York City Youth Board, and she also helped run Inland house for unwed mothers in New York. When I tried to look into it my computor went blank , had to shut down, but it’s worth checking into anyway…..Ralph and Ruth Bunche also had a beautifyl daughter, born 1931 , she also worked on some civil rights protests…..She committed suicide around 1967by jumping from a balcony. Her name was Jane Harris Bunch. You know Ralph died 1971. He’s got Johnson as his middle name, won the Nobel Peace Prize,his birthday was Aug. 7th…You know who I am referring too right? I think Barrack’s youngest daughter looks like Ralph Bunch (call me crazy).
        Ralph went to Hawaii also around 1959.He was also investigated for communist activities as he founded some which were known to be comm.,but he was cleared….possibly because he and Eleanor Roosevelt were best buds and the biggest pushers of the UN ,world peace…yada, yada. the Inwood home for unwed mothers doesn’t seem totally out of the picture to peruse. What do you think? You know Barrack says hes kin to somebody (says he’s a melugeon) in the Bunch line….???? That’s what he says ,not me.

    • That’s an amazing treatise. Do you know what they faked? The first part must be satire because I find nobody touting that meme on the obot sites. But it sounds like something they’d make up. Like saying Obama’s not guilty of forgery.

    • Responding on this thread because the Daily Pen article is related and this will be a long conversation, I believe. Everybody, please go to that link to discuss the Daily Pen article, so we keep this thread on topic. Thanks.

  18. Not to sure if anyone saw this story..

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2012/04/01/tom-harrison–more-proof-obamas-birth-certificate-is-fake-1

    Tom Harrison – More Proof Obama’s Birth Certificate Is Fake!

    http://secure.campaigner.com/Campaigner/Public/t.show?RaPp–CqTY-GOWZj4

    Photo Comparison Proves
    Obama Committed Forgery
    (Based On The Work of Tom Harrison)

    • http://www.theblaze.com/stories/bill-ayers-bernadine-dohrn-advice-to-occupy-the-end-of-america-capitalism-is-here/

      This is a similar story at The Blaze, which explains what they’re ranting about.

      “We’ve got a militarized society and its become so common sense that, getting on the airplane coming out here, the first thing they said was let all the, uhh, let all the ya know, uniformed military get on first and thank you for your service. And I said as I always do: let’s let the teachers and nurses get on first and thank them for their service. I mean, why is it that everything military has got to be good and everything that has to do with actual work, real work, not jobs, real work for people, that stuff gets discouraged and marginalized.”

      This man is literally out of his mind if he doesn’t think that the military do “real work” or “actual work” as opposed to what HE CALLS work. Note that he and disgusting wife are teachers. Good one, Bill. We know you think you should rule and are special. You’re lucky they LET YOU ON A PLANE. A domestic terrorist shouldn’t even be free in our society.

      It’s interesting that they use the word “decline” in talking about our country while at the same time Obama, their beloved, is accusing the Ryan budget of being a recipe for “decline.” This is of a piece with the game Alinskyites play–to accuse others of EXACTLY what they’re doing. He’s calling conservatives “radical”. All this designed to take the sting out of the accusations that they know and that I fervently hope and pray are coming his way.

  19. I’m not sure if you have these pic’s yet or not Bridgette. A couple of them you have above. Staged shot’s for sure. Modeling for the camera?…nice/s. Notice picture #9 and the last picture, the wedding ring on the left finger.

    Married back then? to whom? pakistani lover-bud?

    Picture #11, A thumb longer than his index finger? again picture #9 no way is he over 5″8 – 5’9 in height if he were to stand up. No way no how is that “him”.

    My opnion, I think most of the pictures are of David. May be mistaken, because wouldent David have HEAD SCARS from his “accident” that he supposedly “died” from? again, sarc…. Miss’ed ya! :-)

    http://designyoutrust.com/2009/06/09/young-barack-obama/

    • The amazing appearing/disappearing mole. The clothes are the same, but the person’s age seems to vary. That is quite a large gold ring on his left hand.

      • Yeep’ers!

        Miri, I just came across this. I havent had a chance to read it all yet, but seems to maybe have some names and info. we haven’t come across yet?

        Second art. down.

        http://www.indonesiannext.blogspot.com

        • That is one heck of a translation. It brings back memories of us trying to decipher all of those Indonesian newspaper articles and to make sense out of them.

          Again, BHO was a fat kid yet he was eating slenderizing food or I think Asian food is non fattening.

          I will have to read it a second time to see if it makes more sense. At least we learned that the he is she and vice versa.

          • I know Bridgette, it’s almost funny trying to decipher. Thank goodness you figured out long ago he means she in Indonesian, always throws me for a loop, “he” is “she”.

            I’ve caught a few things….one of them being

            Only Bu Israella Teachers remember that immediately draw up lessons in class III. With the theme “Cita-citaku”, Barack Obama had written: “Cita-citaku: the president.”

            “Cita-citaku”? I looked it up, according to http://www.trove.nla.gov.au/work/22200011 and translated through google it means – Citaku aspirations: the essay writing competition results in the Indonesian language for elementary school years 1975/1976

            Elementary school years 1975/1976?

          • Also found “Cita-citaku” translated to say- Now my goal
            so “Cita-citaku: the president.” would read in english – Now my goal: the president.

            I confess, I do not do good with translation, ;-) .

            HATTA Renee?, sorry was fixing dinner. Where did you find that? I must have missed it somewhere.

        • NOTE*** HATTA Leza,
          He is Proclamator Independence Indonesia (together with Mohammad Hatta) incurred on dated August 17 1945.

    • Great close-ups… Look at the teeth in photos #3 and 5 – one has those sharp, pointed teeth and the other doesn’t. It looks like two different people. The one in leather and the other wearing the hat. Yes, the ring on his hand is very noticeable, and a cheap watch. I must look again, no moles on either guy?

      The one photo makes him look like he has a good body with wide shoulders and narrow waist, but the guys are both tiny, and not any 6’2″.

      I hadn’t seen two of those that I recall. I have a brand new monitor so now I can really see discrepancies that I couldn’t see previously. So everything looks really different to me on a rectangular monitor.

      Missed seeing you too! Glad you are back!

      • I thought it looked like two different guys, too. Close, but not the same. Some photos seem new and others seem to be from that Lisa Jack’s photo spread from Occidental. I don’t think he looks 6’2″, either. The dude in NYC didn’t look that tall, either. Must have been SOME growth spurt. Maybe he took human growth hormone?

        • gday miri , i think obama is ron prescott reagan & seinfeld fills in for him. the have a relationship from acting/ comedy. also ron prescott reagan went to the joffrey ballet school as did “obamas” chief of staff rahm emanuel. – theres a poster of what looks like obama in jerry seinfelds tv series apartment too. i think jerry fills in for him . look at jerrys head posture when talking & his voice cadience. start lookinbg miri

  20. Thank You Bridgette, glad to be back! I think it’s two diffrent people, you can even notice an age diffrence between the people in the photos.

  21. Drudge has this photo on his site, labeled “thin and wasting away.”

  22. Notice in the picture of barry and michelle where the top of his head is cropped off, mouth closed. SEE what appears to be a mole on his neck?? Right side? I’ve never seen a mole in other pictures of him.

    • I noticed that, too, but couldn’t tell what it is.

    • Good eyes Elle. It does resemble a birthmark of some kind. Really hard to tell what it is since I made these photos from a video. The skin colorations in the photos usually show up when a head is attached to a body that doesn’t belong to the head of the person. This photo might originally have been another guy and BHO’s head was attached to the neck. People try to attribute the differences they see to them being “old” photos, but I have scanned old photos of my own and they just don’t show up with all these strange abnormalities.

    • I think it’s the First Fly.

  23. Who is that man doing the touchy feely stuff? Why, it’s Cuba Gooding, Jr. You know how Barry just loves to hang with the 1%-ers in LaLa Land–the rich and famous celebs, that is.

    On a lark, I looked up cauliflower ear at Wikipedia:

    “Cauliflower ear (complication of hematoma auris, perichondrial hematoma, or traumatic auricular hematoma) is a condition that occurs when the external portion of the ear suffers a blow, blood clot or other collection of fluid under the perichondrium. This separates the cartilage from the overlying perichondrium that supplies its nutrients, causing it to die and resulting in the formation of fibrous tissue in the overlying skin. As a result, the outer ear becomes permanently swollen and deformed, resembling a cauliflower. … An extensive literature and serious science on this condition developed between the 1860s and the turn of the century. It was defined as “An effusion of blood or of bloody serum between the cartilage of the ear and its perichondrium, occurring in certain forms of insanity and sometimes among the sane“. Alienists (psychiatrists) argued ardently that it was a symptom of insanity and had nothing to do with mechanical causes. Some thought it was involved in all types of insanity, while others thought it to be worse “in those forms of insanity in which the mental excitement runs high for any length of time“. It was thought to affect the left ear more often than the right. Psychiatrists advanced various theories linking it to abnormalities of bone, blood, or brain in the insane. Others argued that it resulted from an interaction between nervous system degeneration in the insane, and mechanical causes such as the insane hitting themselves or being boxed around the ear by asylum staff (and it was pointed out that this might be the easier explanation for the higher prevalence in the left ear, since most staff were right-handed, rather than convoluted arguments linking it to the origin of the left common carotid artery). It was noted that it could occur to a lesser extent in sportsmen due to an interaction between mechanical blows and the heat and excitement of physical combat. By the end of the First World War the topic disappeared from the medical press and the experts moved onto new fashions. Its mainstream acceptance as a psychiatric symptom has been said to have relevance to scientific and conceptual concerns over psychiatric diagnosis today.”

    Who in his family is right handed? Mom? Grandma? Michelle? Could this be from falling out of that mango tree? Seriously, dogs get this from being bit on the ears by flies. Could long years in the tropics bring about the same result?

    • Boxers and wrestlers have lots of cauliflower ears. My brothers were all wrestlers and this was a major worry for them, until they were given “ear” protectors and used them. I remember ears having to be drained of fluid and it was caused by a blow or injury to their ears. Wasn’t there an old saying about having your ears boxed?

      I never knew there was a psychiatric diagnosis for the problem!

      • I didn’t know about the insanity connection, either, but if the shoe fits … :)

        Seriously, I wondered if there were a disease or something endemic to tropical regions that might cause it. Like tsetse fly bites. Or AIDS. Now that I’m curious, I found a site that says there’s a virus that causes cauliflower ear in babies: http://www.cauliflowerear.org/cauliflower-ear-in-infants-be-cautious/

        Also, an infection from ear piercing can cause it. Yaws? Wonder if that can cause it. Remember someone said Barry might have had yaws? It causes skin lesions.

    • GOODE Day !

  24. Keep forgetting to point this out: In the photo of little Barry sitting next to demure mom, where he’s on the arm of the settee and Mom is wearing that smashing black velvet dress. Do notice how his leg doesn’t smoosh around the arm of the settee. Oh, no. It looks like that wooden arm just impales itself right into his thigh. Ouch.

  25. Just saw this posted elsewhere………

    An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama’s current SSN) rec’d on or about March 1977. Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents. Barack Obama never lived or worked in that state!

    Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. Now comes the best part – J.P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died. Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals. The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised. The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama.

    • 57th, Bridgette debunked this long ago. Mr. Ludwig did not have that SS#. Sorry. If only it were that easy. https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/whose-identity-did-obama-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-48411

      Bridgette | March 15, 2011 at 3:36 pm | Reply | Edit
      The social security numbers are not even close.

      Jean Ludwig 045-26-8722
      Thomas Wood 042-68-4424

      Jean Ludwig
      Birth Date: 17 Feb 1890
      Death Date: Jun 1981
      Social Security Number: 045-26-8722
      State or Territory Where Number Was Issued: Connecticut
      Death Residence Localities
      ZIP Code: 96816
      Localities: Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii
      Death Benefit Localities
      Zip Code: 96816
      Localities: Honolulu, Honolulu, Hawaii

      http://www.familysearch.org/eng/default.asp

      • Go to that link I posted to read our entire debunking. I don’t know how this happened or why it’s coming up again, but it makes me suspicious. Not of you, 57th, but of obots who try to put out something “plausible” only to debunk it to make “birthers” look like crazy conspiracy theorists. iirc, the original researcher was looking for men born in 1890 who were dead in 1977 and who originally got their SS# in CT. But this guy isn’t the one!

          • Thanks. I already found it. Amazing, ain’t I? Four years later and I’ve become a master of the Internet search engines. :) Somebody needs to inform the “misinformed” that he’s wrong and reporting bogus information. btw, came across a long story by Phil Berg where he also debunks this Ludwig stuff BUT then goes on to claim Barry’s legally using the number he uses and that he could have got a CT number even though he lived in Hawaii (allegedly). That’s BOGUS, FALSE, NOT TRUE. Also debunked and proven false (here on our blog, iirc). He misstates the situation in 1977. He may be right about how it works NOW, but it worked differently in 1977. I forgot who giveusliberty1776 is, but I believe s/he used to comment here sometimes.

          • I left them a message that the information was bogus.

            I checked again and my comment wasn’t published yet. It went into moderation, along with my second message that the information was debunked.

        • I happened to be one of the first ones to read about the discovery of the bogus SS#. I immediately, having been in the middle of family genealogy, went and plugged the number in the SS# database. The first time up came Mr. Ludwig’s name. About an hour later, it did not exist. Later that day, instead of Ludwig up came the name Lillian ????. I do not remember her last name and have no idea why I remembered the first, unless it was discussed on some forums or something. Oh, to only to have known about the importance of a screen shot. I am probably just confused???? Not.

          • If only you knew then what you know now–that you must save screen shots of everything because everything disappears as soon as it’s mentioned anywhere. Like the Goeldner website, which is why I never mentioned it on the blog. Now, it’s gone. We read about that SS# issue immediately, too. I don’t know how soon it was that Bridgette debunked this. Ludwig’s number is nowhere near the number Barry uses. Do you remember what SS search you were using? I asked questions about this here: https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/whose-identity-did-obama-steal/comment-page-2/#comment-52994

          • http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2689090/posts?q=1&;page=151 That page at Free Republic discusses the Ludwig affair. Comments by, to, and about Brown Deer are most pertinent. This is the page where we discussed it first, back in March of last year: https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/03/15/whose-identity-did-obama-steal/comment-page-1/#comment-48408 Dr. Kate has a post: http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2011/04/14/who-is-jean-paul-ludwig-john-doe/ Are you sure the name wasn’t Lucille instead of Lillian? Lucille Ballentyne (sp?)

          • I am pretty sure I usefamilysearch.as that is what I was working on when I read the information. I remember cross checking by entering name and up came number. And reversing, entering the number. My memory could be failing, I suppose, and I just imagine I did the exercise???

          • interesting archives kept here http://archive.org/details/ObamaIsUsingJeanPaulLudwigsSocialSecurityNumber

            I have been wracking the brain here. I recall, I think (starting to doubt myself), seeing Obama’s name listed with other SS# and running down all of them. When and how did the ‘not Ludwig’ story start? How was it worded? Maybe it was one of the other numbers that came up as Ludwig? I have scoured for a list of the 36 numbers but nothing comes up. Anyone have them anywhere? As in screenshot? Don’t trust anymore things not being altered.

          • We read about people saying it was Jean Paul Ludwig. Others said it was Sean Paul Ludwig, which was a different guy altogether. When we did SS searches for Jean Paul Ludwig, we came up with a SS# completely different from Obama’s. At first, they knew only the first 5 digits of Obama’s. Then they learned the last four when somebody used computer software to “unmask” or “unredact” the computer-generated redaction of his SS#. Originally, people said that Ludwig had two different death records–one in CA and one in Hawaii. That’s because he apparently DIED in California but his last SS check was mailed to his last known residence in Hawaii. He lived there but apparently moved to California before he died. Perhaps to live with family. Perhaps to be in a hospital or nursing home. But the two records were a misunderstanding by people reading the records. One was a death certificate; the other was his SS death notice that only lists last known residence to receive SS checks. NOT place of death. So he did NOT die in Hawaii. People turned up his name because (iirc) on a Rootsweb search (not definitive because individuals can enter records–or could, when they had the search, which they don’t have now) they were able to search for 1890 date of birth with residence in CT and/or HI. So they were looking for death records for anybody who was born in 1890 and who ever lived in CT and HI. He came up, so they assumed he was the one. But he wasn’t, so far as we can tell. There were likely other men who fit those criteria.

          • Right off the bat, that link you have is wrong. Ludwig died in California, not Hawaii.

          • When I say I used Familysearch I mean I used their search engine which has Social Security Index. After I did that I went to what appeared to be a gov. SS search site that was listed in the article or forum so people could do the same exercise and see for themselves. It worked for me a couple of times. When I went to show my husband later in the day, it did not work. There was lots of discussion about Ludwig but once people traced him down, with even his immigration history, all of a sudden it was gospel truth that his number was entirely different, making the sleuths that “found” the numbers in the first place and of those following the story, look like buffoons and tinnies. All eight numbers were entered so it was not a guess. Feel like I am living in the Twilight Zones

          • It would sure help to have screen shots of that. I don’t remember seeing anyone claim that his number was the one that Obama uses today. I searched today and found nothing to that effect. Familysearch is the Mormon Church website. SOME of their information is user supplied, which means it’s not always accurate. Same for Ancestry.com. Must take it with a grain of salt UNLESS you see sources listed and/or document images. Do you have a link to the article you’re referring to? The one where it was suggested that people try it for themselves?

          • Let’s put it this way: Do you have a link to comments on blogs where you yourself contemporaneously reported that you saw Jean Paul Ludwig’s name come up in association with the exact SS# that Obama uses today?

            I’m not trying to be a jerk or act as if I don’t believe you. I’m simply saying it would help to have something to hang our hat on. We need evidence and you yourself said you weren’t sure of your remembrance of this.

          • There were others having success doing it because we were commenting on it. I was hoping someone from here would have been someone from those forums. I don’t even know what they were anymore. Seems so long ago. Who was the very first to find all numbers to the SS and where was it presented. There must be more like me. But, ah, it is probably something as simple as I need to get a straight jacket! I realize the more I talk the crazier I sound.

          • I have the old computer backed up on some sort of box and if I ever find the right cord for it I may find some stuff I had worked on. I also am going to try to go through some old hard drives — who knows what I will find. I hung onto them because all my genealogy records are on them, so, even if computers died, I thought maybe someday I could retrieve the info on them.

          • I have been looking and I find that this issue came up as long ago as the beginning of 2010. At some point, Orly Taitz glommed onto Jean Paul Ludwig as the candidate. Early on, they DID NOT HAVE the last 4 digits of Obama’s SS#. Ludwig was born 1890, and died 1981. Originally, they said Barry obtained Ludwig’s number through his grandmother working at the bank and knowing about deaths in Hawaii. They said they wanted a SS# for him to use to register for the draft. But later it came out that Ludwig died in California in 1981, AFTER Barry already allegedly registered for the draft. But we know that he didn’t register for the draft. Don’t we?

            I don’t remember the timing of when they released his bogus Selective Service registration. Two different people got it, iirc. Which came first, I don’t remember. Seems to me that’s the document that gave them the last 4 digits, but it may have been his tax return, that they redacted on a computer, without realizing that people could get the full number off the layer beneath.

            All I know is that when we first began looking into it, we immediately saw that much of what they were saying was false and based upon false assumptions. I remember that people did partial searches and came up with lists of candidates’ names. There actually were two different men named Jean Paul Ludwig, iirc. One got his SS# in CT and one in PA.

          • Obtaining the number through granny was supposition. When someone finds something supposedly factual and then attaches a reason or a scenario that is just a supposition, I almost always don’t take seriously the presented fact. It was pretty audacious to give reasons for the the different SS#. Things would go further if just the facts were presented.

          • You’re right. I tried to figure out who was the source of that particular supposition, with no luck. There was another supposition–that Ludwig had two SS#’s because he went into a nursing home and they didn’t know his number so they just set up another so they could collect Medicare/Medicaid for him. While possible, there’s no proof. But there was a viral email to that effect.

          • I don’t know when it started because it just dawned on me when I went to look for it — When did google quit having the little “cache” word to click on the cached version and not the live archived version?

          • When they figured out that we use this to catch them scrubbing. :)

          • I stumbled across this while looking for an early Shirley reference (poet and don’t know it). It’s from 2009 and at Orly’s, but no trojan on this page (I hope).

            http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/from-birthdatabasecom-more-info-we-are.html

            They’re talking about the SS# and the person being 118 at the time! And look at the conversation about Madelyn. Seems this may be the source of that fable about Ludwig and Madelyn getting his SS# off probate records. (Although, even if he died in California, that doesn’t mean there was no real estate or other property to probate in Hawaii. Hmmm.)

            http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/from-birthdatabasecom-more-info-we-are.html

          • Look for email address from uk. It is a strange address and may get caught in spam.

          • Beginning of 2010, then hush for awhile and resurrected in Spring 2011, then put to sleep again until Spring 2012.

          • Duplicate comment – removed
            BB

          • No, I don’t have an article-Hoped someone would remember same thing and name of article/forum to help me recreate.

          • Maybe someone will. I looked at Free Republic but couldn’t find any early ones from 2010. Maybe someone else will have better luck.

          • Name:
            Lillian Appleby
            SSN:
            042-68-8180
            Born:
            18 Aug 1890
            Last Benefit:
            06897 Wilton, Fairfield, Connecticut, United States of America
            Died
            Jun 1978
            State (Year) SSN issued:
            Connecticut (1976-1977)

          • Miri, You are not being a jerk. I have been trying to figure out where I was posting/reading back then. It was at a time I was new to the whole forum thing. I mention in hopes of someone saying something to jog my memory. Even Sherrif Joe is supposedly saying it has been disproved to be Ludwig. First off how in the hell would so many relieable people get it wrong? The numbers between O and Ludsie are waaaaay of. Not just numbers transposed or a digit off, but way off? Ludwigs came came up after, that is after, the full number was uncovered. Does anyone remember who posted and/or where the step-by-step how they found out so people could prove to themselves? There were links to follow. to get to SSDI. Again, you are not being a jerk. The challenge actually forces me to think even harder. Anyone else’s head hurt from trying to reconstruct? I should probably not have asked; just throws more “what ifs” into the mix and you all are trying to gather facts, not a bunch of heresay.

          • Oh, TY. Sometimes intent gets lost in translation when you only read what I write, when I don’t choose words carefully, and when there’s no body language to indicate what I really mean.

            I looked all over for early forum posts about this topic, but found little. There were a few that seem to be disappeared. Totally. From the Wayback Machine, Google cache, the forum archives, etc. Which is interesting and just MAY indicate that something’s up.

            It’s possible that they used, for the draft registration, a deceased person’s SS#. But the public record searches did predate that coming out and they did indicate that Obama was using that SS# for a while. Also other SS#’s, of course.

            It’s funny to review and see the rationalizations some obots came up with. I saw the old “maybe he was visiting where his dad went to college” meme, when BHO Sr. went to college in Hawaii and Massachusetts, not CT. Then there was the old “maybe it’s his father’s SS# and they didn’t indicate “II” or “Jr.” on the searches.

            I also saw that Barry lived in NJ for a time when he was at Columbia, based upon some public record search.

            If they did use a deceased person’s SS#, then perhaps they would corrupt the SS death index later and give him a “new” SS#. Maybe they had no clue that genealogists could search the death index and see SS#’s. Maybe that’s exactly why Barry’s administration is now trying to take that capability away from us completely under the guise of preventing identity theft. But the problem isn’t with dead people. Everyone knowing they’re dead makes it much harder for someone to use their SS#s. It’s active SS#’s that cause the problem. And that COULD BE prevented if the Social Security Administration policed the use of the numbers.

            Just as a credit card company alerts you when something out of the ordinary happens, like you live in Hawaii but somebody in NJ is charging to your account FROM NJ. The SS folks could tell people when someone else uses their SS#, but they don’t and we can guess why. For the same reason they don’t WANT to know who’s in the country illegally. They want to protect the illegal aliens who are using someone else’s SS# to get a job.

            I ran across an article at Orly’s (don’t look for it; it has a trojan, which my anti-virus caught, thank goodness). The article was Orly asking for people to help her find Ludwig’s relatives, presumably so she could confirm what his SS# was. I don’t know what the outcome of that was.

            One reason so many reliable people might have got it wrong is that Apuzzo wrote a column about it early on, and it sounded as if he was saying it was fact that Obama used Ludwig’s SS#, when I don’t think he meant it that way, or if he did, he was basing it on incomplete facts or rumors. I can’t say.

            I do know, however, that that column went through the blogsphere like wildfire. It corrupted my searches yesterday so much that I had to put “NOT” and then part of his text so it wouldn’t keep showing up on the results.

            So it was like a false rumor that spread quickly. (Like Trayvon Martin was a sweet little twelve year old.)

            My head hurts from trying to reconstruct, too. We can’t do it, though, because most of the SSDI searches are now disappeared. Rootsweb is gone and so is Familysearch, from what I can see. Their “new beta” search is now the only one. You can’t go back to the older search, unless I don’t know where to find it now.

            You can still search at Ancestry through Rootsweb, but the government is trying to make them redact the SS#’s AND I DON’T TRUST ANCESTRY. Like Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc., they can be corrupted by obots and I believe they have been already. IF there’s only ONE source for the information, then look how EASY it is for Barry to control the information flow through that one bottleneck. That was their problem with everything thus far. Diffusion of information.

            For example, the birth announcements. Iirc, researchers believed that the scrubbers were playing catch up for a while, trying to find all the libraries with copies of that microfilm. It was easy at first to get the Hawaiian libraries and the newspapers to cooperate, but then they had to look other places like California, for who had copies. The Library of Congress, too, etc.

            Same with something I found yesterday (not found but rediscovered). Frank Laubach, for whom BHO Sr.’s girlfriend (?)/rich benefactress Mooney Kirk worked, has his papers kept at Syracuse University. Within those papers, probably unbeknownst to the obots and certainly unbeknownst to us (else we’d have gotten to them first), were copies of BHO Sr.’s transcripts, which would have shown if he really took a Russian class and WHEN. It was easy to intimidate the U of Hawaii to hide his transcripts, but once one of the official biographers turned up those transcripts (which of course SHE didn’t publicize), then the transcripts conveniently went “currently missing” from those archives.

  26. That’s our barry boy… rejoycing in the agitated passion of pain…
    hurts sooo good … smile even though your heart is breaking??
    I’ll get “them” back big time… just wait & SEE!
    Both of jr. are the same shot just tricked the left arm.. same angle the rest they had fun with… as all the documented shots…
    Past ready to get this dog and pony show over with…. it all just stinks to high… heaven… Who What When Where?? “Come out” who ever you are!

  27. I should have known…..

  28. Really great collection of photoshopping. I saw that The One was a fake the first time I heard the echo-God-reverb in his speeches!

  29. omigosh, I must share.

    There’s been another First Ear sightening wearing a checkered shirt this week. Please be sure to read the virtual comics, too, in the comment section. Bwhahahaaa. tee hee.

    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/04/24/obama-on-romney-we-are-not-friends/

    roflmao. make up a screen name and drop in.
    ~~
    Allen West for Something 2012. Let’s take it to Romney. West 2012

  30. whoa boy. here’s another First Ear sighting this week only its wearing a clooney.

    http://weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/clooney-POTUS.jpg

    • Gee. It almost looks as if they might “accidentally” smooch.

    • Princess, I am having a special garden lunch across the hall tomorrow. You should come. The theme is cherry blossoms and cherries. Guess who is my guest of honor ? Our fave Cherry friend. Come On-A My House, I will give you candy. The guest list very Close and interesting..I have been working hard on it all week.

  31. Hoot… I’ll chime in…I step in and out of the Twilight Zone hourly…
    &… Thanks to all the hard work going on here day & night…
    thankless work… but 100% necessary… So I will thank you ALL!

    • TY, Zenway. We appreciate all your input.

    • Thanks Zen! All of our contributing readers and commenters deserve praise and thanks too. What we don’t see, they do. We are the original version of Attack Watch on the Patriot’s side. We have vetted the usurper and are proud of our contributions for getting the word out about him and his Marxist associates and their agenda.

      We must not forget who the fringe really is and that it these corrupt government officials, czars and organizations that stand against our great republic and its traditions. People have been attacked, ridiculed, and had their careers destroyed by the anti-American people and the organizations they support. Yet, the Silent Majority will be there again come November. We are counting on them to help return our country to its roots and to rally around its true exceptionalism. This will be accomplished by giving all the traitors throughout our great country the boot in their collective behinds!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s