Top of the Mornin’ and Happy St. Patrick’s Day (Open Thread)

If a man who cannot count finds a four-leaf clover, is he lucky? 

~Stanislaw J. Lec

Anyone acquainted with Ireland knows that the morning of St. Patrick’s Day consists of the night of the seventeenth of March flavored strongly with the morning of the eighteenth. 

~Author Unknown


For each petal on the shamrock
This brings a wish your way –
Good health, good luck, and happiness
For today and every day.
~Author Unknown


What do you get when you cross poison ivy

with a four-leaf clover? 

A rash of good luck.

~Author Unknown


May your blessings outnumber
The shamrocks that grow,
And may trouble avoid you
Wherever you go.

~Irish Blessing


Oh, Paddy, dear, an’ did ye hear the news that’s goin’ round?
The shamrock is forbid by law to grow on Irish ground!
No more St. Patrick’s Day we’ll keep, his colour can’t be seen,
For there’s a cruel law agin’ the Wearin’ o’ the green.

~Author Unknown

May the Irish hills caress you.
May her lakes and rivers bless you.
May the luck of the Irish enfold you.
May the blessings of Saint Patrick behold you.

~Irish Blessing


WTPOTUS Wishes You a Fun and Green St. Paddy’s Day!

Here’s to having some corn beef and cabbage, soda bread,

Irish stew and some wonderful Irish brew!

201 responses to “Top of the Mornin’ and Happy St. Patrick’s Day (Open Thread)

  1. Happy Saint Patrick’s Day Patriots!!!! :mrgreen:

    • Happy St Patty’s day to you too Foxy and top a tha mornin to ya !

    • Beannachtaí na Féile Pádraig oraibh!!! A joke:

      Three Irish men are sitting in a pub, looking through the window at the front door of the brothel across the way. The local Methodist pastor arrives, and quickly goes inside.

      “Would you look at that!” says Sean. “But didn’t I always say what a bunch of hypocrites they are?”

      No quicker do the words flee from his mouth but the Jewish Rabbi appears at the door of the brothel, knocks, and goes inside.

      “Another one trying to fool everyone with pious preaching and stupid hats!” exclaims Seamus.

      They continue drinking their stout and roundly condemning the vicar and the rabbi. Suddenly, they espy their own Catholic priest knocking at the brothel door.

      “Ah, now dat’s sad.” says Paddy. “One of dem girls must have died.”

  2. Breitbart Was There.

    Listen to this tripe.

    who does Ben Shapiro think he’s kidding?

    Yea, Derrick Bell’s CRT is an issue that people are for more interested in.

    FYI, Ben, there’s a video (posted Jim O;Keefe’s open thread) from 2001 whereby Barack Hussein Obama discusses at great length his opinion on CRT in his own words — a decade later than his intro of Derrick Bell.

    Inside job? you betcha. Vetting? bullpuckies.

    • Unbelievable! who is Ben Shapiro? Obama’s Selective Service Registration and Fake Birth Certificate are not a issue?….what a joke, this is why Obama can get away with any thing he wants because you have the media and Ben Shapiro who are cowards, they like to pop off at the mouth about vetting Obama but when it come down to vetting Obama the right way they turn and run away. As for Ben Shapiro its not a Democrat and Republican issue its a criminal issue, so Ben Shapiro stop playing your little political games and start looking into the facts that Obama Selective Service Registration and Birth Certificate(and you can throw in Obama’s #SS) they are all fake,fraud made up what ever what want to say about them and yes they are a REAL ISSUE TO TALK ABOUT!!

      • SHAPIRO…what’s in a network name…?

      • Ben Shapiro is one of Breitbart’s successors. He and Joel Pollak. They have been appearing in Andrew’s stead, all over the media. Pollak is running for office. Is Shapiro, too?

        All I can think is that the powers in the Republican Party KNOW the answer and they also know that whatever it is, it is protected. Whether it’s a connection to Malcolm X, to the CIA (through his “mother”), to Ayers (maybe he informed), to OBL (maybe he informed), to communists (in Indonesia or even Russia), to clandestine operations, to the black “power structure” that they fear (maybe he informed there, too), to blackmail, to Raila Odinga, to George Soros–whatever it is, they know and they also know that “it’s not going anywhere” as an “issue.”

        Obviously not because We the People have been screaming at the top of our lungs for 4 years now. Crickets.

        They ARE playing a political game. We’re playing a LEGAL game for the survival of our Republic. We’re playing the “Let’s obey our Constitution” game. We’re playing the, “What else holds us together as a society if the foundational document is destroyed AS the foundational document?” game.

        They think it’s just another election cycle. Shapiro hasn’t a clue if he can misunderestimate these people to the extent that he can say that “the amount of conspiratorial intent” needed would make this impossible.

        He also says that he doesn’t “believe it” and that he “thinks” it’s “not true.” Based upon nothing but willfull disbelief because, unless he’s a stone-cold IDIOT, any logical person, any intelligent person, would see the massive amount of evidence proving that the few documents this man has produced are all suspect. All tampered with or outright forged.

        Shapiro also misunderestimates these communist radicals who have bided, lurked, and plotted for the same “40 years” that he talks about. He says these things, apparently, based upon nothing. He says there’s no “evidence” when there’s plenty of evidence.

        There’s no evidence to back up his claim that it’s not true and his belief that it’s not true.

        The host, whoever he is, did an excellent job of challenging Shapiro. He talked about the Selective Service card. Amazingly, Shapiro claimed he looked at THAT evidence and dismissed it, too. What’s telling is that he says that even if true, “NOBODY can to anything about it.”

        WHY IS THAT BEN? If you know, then as a “journalist” (a lawyer, too?) it’s YOUR JOB TO TELL THE PEOPLE THE TRUTH. THAT’S WHY YOU ENJOY FREEDOM OF THE PRESS–TO INFORM THE PEOPLE WHAT THEIR GOVERNMENT IS DOING. (Checked. Wikipedia says, “Benjamin Aaron Shapiro (born January 15, 1984) is an American conservative political commentator, radio talk show host, attorney, and media consultant. A native of Los Angeles, Shapiro graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles and Harvard Law School. He has written four books, starting with Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America’s Youth in 2004, and writes a column for Creators Syndicate.”)

        WHY CAN “NOBODY” DO ANYTHING ABOUT FRAUD, FORGERY, AND USURPATION? Isn’t THAT a story worth investigating? We’d LOVE TO KNOW why. Why doesn’t Shapiro CARE?

        He says this won’t be an issue in the election. Well, Ben, this is THE PERFECT ALINSKY-STYLE, COMMIE-STYLE ISSUE: It’s simple to understand. It WILL resonate with many peopleyoung people who have to register for the draft, for one. Why is Obama different? It will resonate with EVERYBODY who has to present “identification” papers on a regular basis. Why is Obama different?

        PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THE LAW AND THE LETTER OF THE LAW. They will understand easily and simply if it’s presented to them easily and simply. It’s a sound bite. It’s THE perfect sound bite: He thinks he’s better than us. He thinks HE doesn’t have to play by the rules. He thinks the law and the Constitution don’t apply to him. He thinks We the People MUST follow the rule of law, but he is exempt. That’s Un-American, because he’s UN-American (in every sense).

        Proven. Case closed.

        Obama is DOUBLY INELIGIBLE. Disqualified because not a natural born citizen. Disqualified because he didn’t register for the draft.

        Did you hear somebody laugh out loud at Shapiro when he claimed he looked at the Selective Service evidence and it’s not true?


          Sarah Palin comes out in favor of the “vetting”. She writes an article for them:

          With the death of Breitbart, the conservative movement didn’t just lose a General – we lost an entire Special Forces Division. But he didn’t leave us without the tools and the knowledge we need to fight. This website – Breitbart 2.0 – is the culmination of his study of the technology and aesthetics of new media. The team Breitbart assembled under the leadership of Steve Bannon, Larry Solov, and Joel Pollak will advance his mission with courage and integrity.

          Breitbart’s most immediate mission was the belated vetting of Barack Obama. This obviously is an issue very near and dear to my heart.

          During the ’08 campaign, the same media that reported breathlessly about an old used tanning bed I purchased to get some sun during the dark Alaskan winter, couldn’t be bothered to investigate Barack Obama’s associations, statements or even his voting record as a state senator. Suntans and what I wore on the campaign trail were more important than Obama’s political background. Unbelievable.

          But when you come to think of it, the media didn’t investigate either of our actual political records very closely.

          Barack Obama and I both served in political office in states with a serious corruption problem. Though there is a big difference between serving as the CEO of a city, then a state, and regulating domestic energy resources, and being a liberal Community Organizer, bear with me on the comparison. The difference between my record and Barack Obama’s is that I fought the corrupt political machine my entire career (and I have twenty years of scars to prove it) on the local, state, and national level. But Obama didn’t fight the corruption he encountered. He went along with it to advance his career. Graft, cronyism, and quid pro quo are the methods of the Chicago political machine from which he emerged.”
          There’s more at the link.

          • Sarah wrote, “Is it any wonder Breitbart titled his autobiography “Righteous Indignation” when you consider his deep-seated sense of justice and fair play? He was on the side of the little guy and ready to run to the aid of those who needed it. He possessed that old fashioned virtue of courage, compassion, and decency that we once called chivalry. He inspired that in others.”

            Coincidentally enough, like Obama, Breitbart was also adopted. Unlike Obama, however, Breitbart was IRISH! Those virtues Sarah notices are ingrained in the IRISH culture and genes. (Not that they don’t exist in other peoples, too.) But this furthers my point that Barry CANNOT have one drop of Irish blood in his veins. He can’t and he doesn’t. Count on it.

            • Well, in light of what Ben Shapiro said and how we are roundly ignored, excoriated, and mocked by people who are SUPPOSED to be on our side, this that Sarah wrote is particularly ironic:

              “When you’re in the political arena serving for the right reasons and taking flak from all sides, there is nothing more discouraging than when your fellow conservatives sit on their thumbs or worse yet, join in the attacks. Breitbart understood this because he experienced it himself at times, so he was determined to stand by others in need.”

        • Ben Shapiro is lying through his teeth.

          and, yes, Miri, I did catch that outburst.

  3. Gráinne Ní Mháille, aka Grace O’Malley, the Sea Queen Of Connaught, is said to have informed Queen Elizabeth I,

    “I bow to no one!”

    Would that our so-called potus had the same attitude! He bows to tyrants who oppress women.

    By THIS ALONE, I know there’s not one drop of Irish blood in his purple lips. NOT ONE DROP. His “mother” is NOT his biological mother. He’s no son of Hibernia, where WOMEN had equal rights. Where there was matriarchy, not patriarchy. Where Queen Macha ruled. Where women were RESPECTED AND VALUED as equals, as human beings, as rulers. He may be full of blarney, but he’s not full of ANY Irish genes. I reject him. I vomit him out of my mouth. FAH!

  4. And to our Irish readers (I know you’re there!):

    Céad míle fáilte!!!

  5. Here’s a story to warm the cockles of your heart:

    “CIA Chief: We’ll Spy on You Through Your DishwasherBy Spencer Ackerman Email Author March 15, 2012

    More and more personal and household devices are connecting to the internet, from your television to your car navigation systems to your light switches. CIA Director David Petraeus cannot wait to spy on you through them.

    Earlier this month, Petraeus mused about the emergence of an “Internet of Things” — that is, wired devices — at a summit for In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm.

    “‘Transformational’ is an overused word, but I do believe it properly applies to these technologies,” Petraeus enthused, “particularly to their effect on clandestine tradecraft.”

    All those new online devices are a treasure trove of data if you’re a “person of interest” to the spy community. Once upon a time, spies had to place a bug in your chandelier to hear your conversation. With the rise of the “smart home,” [aka the “smart” grid”] you’d be sending tagged, geolocated data that a spy agency can intercept in real time when you use the lighting app on your phone to adjust your living room’s ambiance.

    “Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvestersall connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing,” Petraeus said, “the latter now going to cloud computing, in many areas greater and greater supercomputing, and, ultimately, heading to quantum computing.” [BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!!!]

    Petraeus allowed that these household spy devices “change our notions of secrecy” and prompt a rethink of “our notions of identity and secrecy.” All of which is true — if convenient for a CIA director.

    The CIA has a lot of legal restrictions against spying on American citizens. But collecting ambient geolocation data from devices is a grayer area, especially after the 2008 carve-outs to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Hardware manufacturers, it turns out, store a trove of geolocation data; [without you or your representatives even knowing about it!] and some legislators have grown alarmed at how easy it is for the government to track you through your phone or PlayStation.

    That’s not the only data exploit intriguing Petraeus. He’s interested in creating new online identities for his undercover spies — and sweeping away the “digital footprints” of agents who suddenly need to vanish.”

    Scrubadubdub the Web, too. As if we haven’t noticed! They sweep away Barry’s “documentary footprints.” Dare I freaking say it? General Betr…

  6. Sheriff Joe on Obama Investigation: We Have Tons of Information; Media Silent

    He has standing! He said he will be making a decision as to where to send this evidence, probably this week. [Congress? – the WH and DOJ sure won’t be wanting to help, and why wouldn’t Obama want to clear it up? Hawaii? ]

    They are zeroing in on the fraudulent documents, the birth certificate and the selective service document.

  7. We Talked about this on another thread..HR 347.

    Have You Had Enough Of Obama, America?
    March 17, 2012

    Under the cover of darkness and a media blackout, Barack Hussein Obama has signed HR 347 into law. Most of you may think that it is just another law with no teeth,but think again! HR 347 has cancelled out our First Amendment rights to free speech and to peaceably protest where secret service agents are present, and at their discretion. Remember all of the town hall meetings with our elected leaders? They will now be a thing of the past. We the People HAVE LOST OUR VOICE!!!

    • Free Speech/Protesting is now a Felony Offense – Judge Napolitano

    • OPPRESSION. That’s what it is. I heard that people are shouting “FREEDOM!!!” at Santorum rallies. Small wonder.

    • We have NOT lost our voices. Civil disobedience in the face of TYRANNY is PATRIOTISM. This “law” CANNOT STAND even if every member of Congress thinks it can. The Constitution trumps Congress. The only way we can lose our First Amendment rights is via constitutional amendment. Congress SHALL MAKE NO LAW abridging our free speech and free assembly rights. NO LAW. This is an unconstitutional law and it SHALL NOT STAND. Civil disobedience is not the sole right of the progressive left. On THIS ONE, even the ACLU, Code Pink, and OWS will agree with us. Barry said he’d bring the people together. Well, this one will do it!

      • What’d I say?

        aka potus “signed bill H.R. 347 (also known as the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011) into law on March 9th, amid numerous protests from the Occupy movement, as well as other agencies. [OWS is an agency? Who knew?] HR 347 is a modification from Senate bill S. 1794, which restricted people from entering or blocking public areas that have been closed off by Secret Service while a person under their protection is passing through. The law also included major public events, such as the Inaguration and Presidential campaigns.
        The new law, which passed the House with a vote of 399-3, extends the original law by adding more protected areas within Washington D.C, and removing the word “willfully,” from the paragraph stating that protesters can be prosecuted if they enter the area “willfully and knowingly.”

        Representative Justin Amash, R-Michigan, explains this change by saying: “The bill expands current law to make it a crime to enter or remain in an area where an official is visiting even if the person does not know it’s illegal to be in that area and has no reason to suspect its illegal.”

        Occupy DC protesters are calling the modifications an infringement on their First Amendment rights, because of the areas of D.C. that have been added to the protected areas portion of the act. Approximately 80 protesters organized a silent march to symbolize their Freedom of Speech being taken away–some even taped their mouths closed to visually show their feelings about the bill.” [Had I known and been in DC, I’d have joined them! With disinfectant and face mask. 🙂 ]


    • OMG. Election year and the return of API!

      • Are we still waiting for that “whitey” tape? (Reading comments now and I see somebody named Sybil asked about those tapes, too.)

      • Notice that was March 9 and it’s now a week later. Where’s the birth certificate? Stored away with that whitey tape. 🙂

        They linked to this story which says:

        “The former Mombasa Imam who gave Obama’s mother the birth certificate after the birth of Barack Hussein Obama is now living in the UK after seeking for asylum in 2008 when the subject of Obama’s citizenship was in top gear. The Imam fled Mombasa to Britain where – saying he did so for his own safety. The former Imam tells API that he will soon hold a press conference on the issue when it feels safe to do so..”

        That sounds familiar so may have been linked before. All these people do is promise. Reminds me of Barry. Must run in the “family”.

        • I came across this interesting article. Make sure that you read the comments as well.

          Is it all about Africa, the oil, copper, gold, etc? Is that why he was elected? Why did he need to get Odinga elected? Why did Dick Morris go over there to help with Odinga’s campaign?

          Make sure that you read the comments as well. There is one that makes reference to the birth certificate.

          • I think the royals-elite group wants their colonies back Cynic, or what they decided was theirs…WE may just be another one they decided belonged to them too… I think you are right Cynic….MORRIS ? hummm…
            Where is that Morris lady Miri ? Do you remember ?

          • very interesting and credible.

            (with all the money that has been poured into Africa over the decades the place should filled to the gills with civilized citiies)

          • It’s not “the West;” it’s the GLOBAL powers.

            • “… why don’t we hear a major outcry from the black communities in the United States?” Is this writer serious?

              Because no matter their ancestry, blacks don’t “identify” with Africa. When I went to college, African-Americans resented the foreign students from Africa. African-Americans are Americans. They don’t identify, for sure, with Libyans. Why would they?

              She says, “I can assure you that we’d have heard the outcry if a white president had supported, armed and directed militias and rebels …” I’m not so sure about that. Besides, he IS a “white” president. Or so he tells us. Half-white, at least. About as black as Libyans.

              If Libyans are killing “blacks” in Libya and Barry supports it, it’s because he identifies with Libyan Muslim/Arabs and not with Libyan “blacks” from the sub-Sahara. She writes,

              “You would think our black communities in the US would be up in arms in reaction to a black president taking the lead in the partition and re-colonization of Africa, while amassing piles of bodies daily. Isn’t this a betrayal of African Americans by a black man?”

              No I wouldn’t think that because (1) he’s not a black man and (2) how is whatever he does in Africa a “betrayal” of African-Americans? What he does in THIS country is a betrayal of ALL Americans, including African-Americans.

              Does she truly believe that he chooses winners and losers in Africa based upon race or color? No, my dear, it’s based upon religion.

              She says she doesn’t view Obama or even Bush as “black” or “white”, as if she’s post-racial. Then she makes this RACIST statement: “The white men frequently use black men to take over other black men.”

              THE WHITE MEN? THE WHITE MEN? Where are these “white men” who “frequently” do this? How about the black men in Africa who took over other black men and sold them into slavery? She talks about how white men allegedly feared going into the middle of Africa, so they waited on the shores to pick up their slaves. So WHO enslaved the slaves it if wasn’t other black men, since it couldn’t be those fearful evil white men?

              She calls Barry an Uncle Tom. So there it is. Who’s the racist here? (And I’m not defending Barry. He is what he is and he’s FAR WORSE than an Uncle Tom.)

          • Cynic, I looked alot into this angle also. There are 2 posts on Africa across the hall as well as these. I find the connections amazing…

        • Miri, She was the Morris we looked into in Hawaii. btw,
          It’s not “the West;” it’s the GLOBAL powers.

          I agree.

    • API! lol, i forgot about them,Miri you are right still waiting for whitey tape…..i hope the tapes will soon be available for download at itunes lol!!!!

      • Somebody can make a snappy itune out of it. You know, like that one where they took some guy’s rant and set it to a beat with music. They could get really creative and intersperse it with Granny Sarah speaking in Luo, saying she saw little baby Barry pop out, right before he “passed through her hands.” Maybe that explains those head scars–he flew right out, passed through Granny Sarah’s hands, and landed, SPLAT! Square on his pointed little head.

      • With my crummy memory that is overloaded with minutiae about Obama, I’m amazed that I remembered that one, too!

  8. For anyone who imagines that this guy is the Tea Party conservative he PRETENDS to be, just read this:

    Or don’t. It may not be worthwhile, but it’s illustrative of OBOTS. This guy portrays himself as an intelligent, conservative, Christian guy who is just looking logically at facts and trying to be intellectually honest, no matter where the truth lies. He cites Babs Nelson. ENUF SAID! You’re busted, OBOT. Wear that label proudly. You have EARNED IT.

    • Miri,

      For what it’s worth, I just posted *the truth* over at that moonbat site; I’m in moderation. What a bunch of sick pups there! That’ll be my first and last post.

      • You may be in moderation forever. Believe it or not, I saw this same guy calling out Sharon Rondeau, on some other blog (don’t ask me which, I read so many, and only note this stuff subconsciously). He was criticizing Sharon for not taking comments, iirc. Or maybe it was for not answering email. Accusing HER of being intellectually dishonest. Oh, I have his number. Believe me!

        Babs Nelson, though. PUHLEEEZE! Been there; DEBUNKED THAT. She admitted it, btw, for those who don’t remember. A nice little “story”.

      • This is yet another so-called, self-proclaimed, non-partisan “fact checker” who, in fact, doesn’t look at facts but instead resorts to Alinsky ridicule. Not only Babs Nelson (DEBUNKED) but also the LIE that BHO Sr. was so poor he couldn’t have afforded to take SAD to Kenya. Let’s forget all about those SEVERAL WEALTHY WHITE WOMEN WHO TOOK HIM UNDER THEIR WINGS AND BANKROLLED HIM. Let’s forget all about TOM MBOYA AND HIS OTHER KENYAN MUCKETY-MUCK PATRONS. He says a “heavily pregnant” SAD wouldn’t have traveled. But she left school after one semester, when she was (arguably) only a few months pregnant. Where was she from for the 8 months prior to Barry’s supposed birth? Actually where was she from Dec. 1960 when school let out and she showed up in Seattle, in late August 1961? Since his babysitter in Seattle said he was 7 months old when her daughter (born July 1959) was 18 months old, that means Barry was born right about the time SAD disappeared! How is that possible? Well, maybe she didn’t go to Kenya pregnant. Maybe she went there to pick up the kid and bring him “home” to Hawaii, after he was born there and passed through his “step-grandmother’s” hands AS AN ORPHAN or at least as a child given up for ADOPTION, because his birth mother, for whatever reason, didn’t want him. And on paper, either way, he COULD BE BHO Sr.’s son. Either if BHO Sr. was SAD’s husband and the adoptive father OR because, ON PAPER IN KENYA, he was the biological father (although impossible) BECAUSE it was his first wife in Kenya who gave birth. Used to be that if a married woman gave birth, ANY child born during that marriage was the child of the husband, no matter who the real father was. This OBOT asks who would SAD have gone to Kenya to visit. Answer: The adoption agency. The NGO’s that handled such things. BHO Sr.’s white, wealthy AMERICAN patronesses. Does this OBOT realize that Kenya was a British colony and that many of its citizens speak ENGLISH? Maybe she was visiting some of those Kenyan journalist friends or politician friends of BHO Sr.’s. Maybe she didn’t go to KENYA. Maybe she went to CANADA, where her Aunt Eleanor lived. Maybe, if she was pregnant, she gave birth there, in Canada, a FIRST WORLD nation with excellent health facilities. Hey! As the wife of a British subject, she might have been eligible for free health care in Canada. When this OBOT first began blogging, he presented himself just as I said: As a Tea Party conservative. Note the devolution. Note the Alinsky tactics. Mr. W.– you haven’t smelled right from the very beginning. Like all the fogblowers, we have your number. You fool no one.

    • Ohhh, another John Woodman story…the jerk that posts most often on progressive sites, because, of course, they are in agreement with his findings. Conservative and a Tea Partier – when John? Didn’t he spend 3 full months writing a book..oh, maybe that is what the article was about. I just saw the author and didn’t waste my time. He is only listened to by the bots and they set up his radio appointments. They say, see we have a Tea Partier that agrees with our lies, isn’t he special!!

      • You know how he presents his conservative credentials? He says when Matt Blunt announced a political run, he went to see him. He says when Sarah Palin was in Missouri, he went to see her. Well, that clinches it! OBOTS never go to see Republicans or conservatives to take notes or disrupt or spy or anything Alinsky like that. I could go see John Kerry or even Obama (no, I couldn’t, but pretend I could). That doesn’t mean I’m a FAN. We know who he is. He fools no one. We can use computers, too, Mr. W. OBOT.

  9. Just got this via an e-mail; it rattled me to the bone.

    We knew this was coming down, but we didn’t know when. Looks like it’s M.L. (Martial Law) time in America, folks. Fasten your seatbelts.

    • EO is up on the WH Website and it is for real.

      This Executive Order was posted on the web site on Friday, March 16, 2012, under the name National Defense Resources Preparedness. In a nutshell, it’s the blueprint for Peacetime Martial Law and it gives the president the power to take just about anything deemed necessary for “National Defense”, whatever they decide that is. It’s peacetime, because as the title of the order says, it’s for “Preparedness”. A copy of the entire order follows the end of this story.

      Under this order the heads of these cabinet level positions; Agriculture, Energy, Health and Human Services, Transportation, Defense and Commerce can take food, livestock, fertilizer, farm equipment, all forms of energy, water resources, all forms of civil transportation (meaning any vehicles, boats, planes), and any other materials, including construction materials from wherever they are available. This is probably why the government has been visiting farms with GPS devices, so they know exactly where to go when they turn this one on.

      Specifically, the government is allowed to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate. They decide what necessary or appropriate means.

      UPDATE: BIN reader Kent Welton writes: This allows for the giving away of USA assets and subsidies to private companies: “(b) provide for the modification or expansion of privately owned facilities, including the modification or improvement of production processes, when taking actions under sections 301, 302, or 303 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2091, 2092, 2093; and (c) sell or otherwise transfer equipment owned by the Federal Government and installed under section 303(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2093(e), to the owners of such plants, factories, or other industrial facilities.”

      What happens if the government decides it needs all these things to be prepared, even if there is no war? You likely won’t be able to walk into a store to purchase virtually anything because it will all be requisitioned, “rationed” and controlled by the government. Construction materials, food like meat, butter and sugar, anything imported, parts, tires and fuel for vehicles, clothing, etc. will likely become unobtainable, or at least very scarce. How many things are even made here in the USA any more?

      A bit of history… During WWII, price stabilization didn’t begin until May of 1942, which froze prices on nearly all every day goods and rationing started in 1943. Why would the government want to control everything before a war?

      Here’s what some gas ration cards looked like during WWII. Will there be rationing under this kind of system? What better way to control the movement and actions of the populace…WWII era gas ration cards via Old Chester PA. You couldn’t go on vacation without a “vacation pass”.

      Under this new Executive Order, cabinet heads are authorized to loan money, offer loan guarantees and even subsidize payments at above market rates (no bid contracts?) for whatever they need. This could make Solyndra or Halliburton look like Junior Achievement. Nothing like a war will generate these kinds of huge profits for the corporate “partners” and you can bet the bankers and contractors are already lining up for this one — because under this order no war is even required!

      In a crisis situation, the government will be able to take whatever they need, print money to get whatever they want and distribute it as they see fit….for the benefit of a “war effort” or the politically connected corporations and individuals. All other contracts except those for employment are superseded by this executive order, it’s all here in black and white.

      • Bridgette,

        I worked for the state in Anti-Terror Preparedness for several years. It was a matter of getting all ducks in a row and writing preparedness and consequence management plans in the event of a biological, chemical and nuclear/radiation attack. All states have some sort of emergency plan already in place.

        There were no provisions in any of our plans regarding seizing the assets of anyone. None!

        This bit o’crappola is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt at imposing martial law; it has nothing at all to do with ‘preparedness.’

        …and it won’t work.

        • Sue, I read the thing, the executive order. Quickly, I admit, but I see nothing about seizing property. If you see it because you have experience with this stuff, we’d appreciate it if you could point out the crucial passages. I’m not qualified to interpret these things. It’s like with legal questions. I can read it and I think I understand plain English, but there are nuances that can (and do, ask Hayden) go right over my head.

          • Hi Miri,
            I (and probably 1 million others), sent the White House link to Drudge in the wee hours this morning. He has posted it. When Drudge posts something, I always pay attention.

            Gub’mintSpeak is something that’s acquired over time. Here are the passages that are critical to understanding this monster:

            201e: “Upon such approval, the Secretary of the resource department that made the finding may use the authority of section 101(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(a), to control the general distribution of any material (including applicable services) in the civilian market.”
            They determine the goods and services to be ‘controlled’. This may include gas, electric, food, etc.

            308. All of it. The word ‘procure’ with reference to ‘privately owned’ facilities simply means that these facilities will be taken over as they see fit.

            The phrase ‘procurement for the national defense’ is used throughout this EO. All it really means is that under this law, they take whatever they need from whichever source they choose.

            501(a) Here are your Brown shirts. (b) Note the word ‘recruitment.’

            601. If ordered, YOU will work for them in whichever capacity they deem fit.

            801(a) Note the phrase “Civil transportation” also shall include direction, control, and coordination of civil transportation capacity regardless of ownership.’ Regardless of ownership. Hmmm….

            Actually, Part VIII-General Provisions gives the definitions of what they can take if they think it’s necessary; basically, everything.

            Hope that helped a bit. You may need to reread it a few times but it’s all there. This needs to be dealt with and NOW; I wonder if this will be the impetus to get Congress off their lazy azzes and actually DO something for a change. We’re in deep sneakers, here.

            • The thing is, this has happened in the past and that’s WHY it’s important that the person who wields all this power be a natural born US citizen with NO POSSIBLE OUTSIDE ALLEGIANCE. This all happened during WWII. It HAD to happen in war time. That’s the way it is. It HAS to happen during monumental national disasters. That’s the way it is. The government MUST do this to protect the nation and that’s just about the ONLY thing the federal government IS empowered to do by the Constitution. Hot Air has reported that this EO is nearly exactly the same as the one in effect under Clinton and Bush, except for the names of cabinet officers. Obama has, unfortunately, ALWAYS had the power to do any of this stuff, so long as our representatives allow him to do it. And so long as We the People allow him to. I wouldn’t count on that happening, if he tries anything like this without CLEAR REASONS for doing so. That would mean something along the lines of WWIII. I have a life-sized picture of him trying to confiscate agricultural resources when there’s an armed populace that sees no reason for it to happen. Thank the Founding Fathers for their wisdom. The Second Amendment is our bulwark against TYRANNY. We need to elect WHOEVER the Republican nominee is. It’s crunch time. The most liberal RINO in the country is better than Obama. ANYBODY but Obama. He needs to retire. If not now, then in January 2013.

    • That’s a lot to choke down! Who will question this and just how far can he go.. Waiting for a Senator or Congressman to weigh in!

      • I read it. It’s hard to see that it’s what the writer says it is. It appears to be rescinding parts of similar EOs from 1975, 1988, and 1994. I suppose somebody who wants to do the research (not me!) can go looking at those previous EOs from other administrations and then “compare and contrast” as Hannity and English teachers like to say. Somebody will do it for us, if we only wait a day or two. 🙂

  10. The API story had a comment that caused me to go back and look at Zullo’s comments at the press conference. Did anybody note this? Zullo said that they asked the National Archives if there were passenger manifests. NARA said no, but they have those INS port of entry cards. So Zullo asked them to COPY THE MICROFILMS onto some kind of rolls that could be viewed on a film reader (I couldn’t make out his exact words, but he said they were copied from one medium to another.) They asked for 10 years of the films. So, Corsi couldn’t find that missing week in the rolls they made FOR HIM. I remember reading that one roll ENDED right where August 1 should begin and the next roll started at August 8. So August 1-7 MISSING. But ending one roll with July 31 and starting the next at August 8 makes it look like it could be just an error. An oversight. They asked NARA what happened and so far, no explanation. BUT what’s important is that the ORIGINAL MICROFILM still exists. It needs to be closely examined to see if that roll still contains that week. It must be some other type of film. Maybe longer rolls, not meant to be viewed on readers. Anybody know? Not only does the source microfilm still exist, surely the actual cards still exist. Even IF whenever the cards were filmed, SUSPICIOUSLY AND COINCIDENTALLY the week of Barry’s birth got “forgotten” or “misplaced” during the filming, that doesn’t mean that they no longer exist. They exist. IMHO, this makes the NARA that much more complicit. It means that not only did someone deliberately omit that week while copying these records for Corsi to look at, whoever at NARA is supposed to investigate why the records are missing, is being mum. They can go back to the original and pull a new film for Corsi, WITH THE MISSING WEEK. Can’t they? Seems like. Absent that, they can go pull the actual cards and photograph them for Corsi AND THE WORLD with a digital camera.

  11. Miri,

    I would send this post to Sheriff Joe and have the investigators think about it. It sounds like you know what you’re saying to me.

    Also, I wrote on ORYR, and I posted that thing that you guys got from Ulsterman about the person who knew BO and had even talked to the FBI and nothing came from it. At least he could talk to SJ’s investigators.

    Gee, why do I think we’ve all been set up? And I don’t mean it paranoid at all. It’s just that nothing about justice is working much at all.

    • kittycat, I’m sure that if I thought of it, Zullo and Arpaio are miles ahead of me. They must have 80 years detecting experience between them. Not to mention all the other members of their posse. These guys are pros. Arpaio used to work for the federal government. He knows what’s in the archives or what should be. They know, they can SMELL IT, when they’re being scammed and BS’d. I bet there’s not a seasoned detective in this entire country who doesn’t take a look at Barry and know, instinctively, who and what he is. A scam artist. You can’t lie to guys like this. It’s why there’s no response from NARA when they asked where that week is and why it’s missing. Arpaio knows that archival documents aren’t destroyed. It’s the ARCHIVES for goodness sakes! They don’t destroy records. But they have been known to allow records to be disappeared and destroyed (Sandy Berger). It’s also possible they don’t know what happened. Could be a Sandy Burglar got hold of those films made for Corsi before Corsi did. Could be the end of that one film was conveniently snipped off. Or the beginning of the next film. If NARA cares, they could go to the original tape and get the information. Arpaio and Zullo know that. But this is like with SAD’s pre-1965 passport application. Stonewalled. They know the “sensitivity” of this issue. Like in Hawaii, where it’s said Barry’s records were removed from the usual location, where they’re accessible to the clerks, and stored in a special vault that only Onaka can open, anything pertaining to Barry has probably already been disappeared or locked up, where no clerk can ever stumble across it. Maybe that executive order requires it to be so. But like with the HDOH, they’re not “free” to tell Arpaio’s posse the truth. It will come out, perhaps, AFTER he’s no longer potus. IF that EVER happens.

  12. I’m just having a difficult time posting anything for some reason. Goofy Internet.

  13. This new EO may be them getting ready when the American People find out that POTUS BC is a fraud. Matter O-Fact….when the people figure out that Obama is a fraud.

    • I figured somebody would do the drudge work for us. Take it for what it’s worth:

      “We’re getting a lot of e-mail this weekend about an executive order issued on Friday afternoon by President Obama titled “National Defense Resources Preparedness.” While the timing of the EO is curious — why send it out on a Friday afternoon when an administration is usually trying to sneak bad news past the media? — the general impact of it is negligible. This EO simply updates another EO (12919) that had been in place since June 1994, and amended several times since. … this is almost identical to EO 12919 from 18 years earlier. Note what this EO specifically orders: identify, assess, be prepared, improve, foster cooperation. None of these items claim authority to seize private property and place them at the personal disposal of Obama. What follows after Section 103 are the directives for implementing these rather analytical tasks, mostly in the form of explicit delegations of presidential authority to Cabinet members and others in the executive branch.
      Why the update? If one takes a look at EO 12919, the big change is in the Cabinet itself. In 1994, we didn’t have a Department of Homeland Security, for instance, and some of these functions would naturally fall to DHS. In EO 12919, the FEMA director had those responsibilities, and the biggest change between the two is the removal of several references to FEMA (ten in all). Otherwise, there aren’t a lot of changes between the two EOs, which looks mainly like boilerplate.
      In fact, that’s almost entirely what it is. The original EO dealing with national defense resources preparedness was issued in 1939 (EO 8248) according to the National Archives. It has been superseded a number of times, starting in 1951 by nearly every President through Bill Clinton, and amended twice by George W. Bush.”

      That was how it looked to me from skimming the new EO and some of Clinton’s version. Without running the texts through software (which I don’t have, that I know of!) I couldn’t quickly and easily get the answer, but I knew somebody would! TY, Hot Air.

      If this weren’t the most corrupt and unconstitutional administration in history, We the People wouldn’t be so twitchy.

      • Miri,

        I read your post after I finished posting the sections of the EO of concern.

        THE question is: Why now????

        From my perch, there are no active threats; we would know if there were.

        The timing of this ‘modification’ seems just a bit odd to me.

        • Well, yeah. I noticed the same thing Morrissey did–this was like a Friday night document dump. Maybe they did it then because they knew it would ignite this firestorm of paranoia, which it did anyway. Just because we’re paranoid doesn’t mean that there’s nothing to fear.

          He’s created the situation where we feel constantly under attack from him and his administration. It’s his plan, of course. To keep us upset, scared. Scared people are easier to control. But he doesn’t want scared people now, when he’s trying to act all presidential and in charge so he will be reelected, and not when Breitbart’s people and all of us little Breitbarts are getting more and more attention as people are exposing just how RADICAL this person is.

          This kind of accusation WILL resonate across the land, especially in rural areas. Right now, EVERYTHING he does is under scrutiny. That’s a GOOD thing because now they’re the ones who are getting scared and rattled. Turn the tables on him.

          The impeachment warning filed by Jones could be why they’re rattled, but gee. A media blackout on THAT, too. Kucinich filed impeachment charges against GWB, and it WAS reported at Huffpo and The Nation, probably elsewhere. I didn’t extensively check, but it was at least reported. Well, Newsmax did report this . I didn’t know Jones used to be a DemocRAT. There’s redemption for everyone. Better late than never.

  14. Obama is coming to OK next week. Why? We are considered the most conservative state in the country. We cannot stand him here. We have been told that he is going to Cushing (the crossroads of pipelines in the USA) to talk about the Keystone pipeline. He then is supposed to attend a Thunder BB game. Cushing is near where all the strange earthquakes have been happening. Is someting being setup?

    • Absolutely something is being set up. Most likely Obama is going to announce it is a go with the Keystone pipeline. He has been working in obots brains for a couple of weeks that he is pro drilling and it has been going on. He will announce moving forward, “because we can’t just sit back and let the Republicans keep us from getting to our oil,” he will say. His visit will be the capstone to a hero-in-the-making.

      • I think you both are probably right. Hegel politics sort of the name of the game here. I wish I could say I am for the Keystone,but I am not. That’s not the solution to anything and possibly a detriment to the whole country. If we were drilling right here and exploring, we need more refioneries that were shut down in Clinton/Gore time, or more drilling won’t do us anygood either. Why if we need a pipeline through our whole country, don’t we build one ourselves, one that we can control, carry our own oil thru.,shut down if we need to, and give people jobs in this country for a bit.This will be litigation for years to come. Canada has us over a Barrel literally, but because of politics, we’re goingo to think it’s a sweet deal to finally get the pipeling when that’s just the beginning of a nightmare.
        I do think something is up, the media is being told how to spin this, I do believe Obama’s got friends in places in Oklahoma…..I find several relatives to the Dunhams their. Check if their were ever any Dunhams having anything to do with the Railroads there…..I think maybe there is a connection there.

  15. After promising (pretending, taqiyya-like) that they were only in the city for a peaceful planning conference and that they WOULD NOT disrupt the St. Patrick’s Day parade, the Poopstockers did just that. The return of the human microphone, too, btw. They were booed and the police kicked them off the street, before long. No surprise that after a bunch of positive, glowing reports about OWS and other reports sympathizing with them for getting arrested (no mention of vandalizing the police car), there was NOTHING on TV news this morning about their disruption of the parade.

    They covered the parade. Oh, yes. Just no mention of the OWS disruption. Look at those dirty pigs. Compare them to the paraders and those gathered with their kids to watch the parade and enjoy a celebration.

    They must be upset that OWS turnout was so poor. They gathered Poopstockers from all over the Midwest. Expected thousands. There were only a few hundred the first day. Looks like less than that now.

    Hundreds of thousands gathered to celebrate St. Paddy’s Day. Who are the real 1%?

  16. now all he has to do is declare a national emergency and take everything we own. 👿

    • Foxy, look above. We covered this already and it’s identical to a Clinton-era EO that actually has roots in the ’30s. It was apparently modified to use the names of new cabinet members, like Dept. of Homeland Security. That’s according to Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey. As Ed says, paraphrasing, even Barack Obama isn’t that stupid.

        • You’re welcome. I admit that I was scared at first, too. Had to calm myself down last night. But the way this went VIRAL is a GOOD THING. It means people are paying attention. It means people are waking up to the threat that is Barry. Before long, the tables will be turned. Once the genie is out of the bottle, there’s no putting it back in. My local paper, which is very liberal and which has NEVER criticized Barry, ran 4 editorial columns today. 3 out of 4 were critical of Barry. Two of them took him to task for unconstitutionally acting as if he has the power to be judge, jury, and executioner of American citizens that HE decides are a threat, without going to our representatives or the courts. Their editorial cartoon, which always attacks conservatives and Republicans, this time ridiculed Eric Holder for shredding the Constitution (over the same issue. Drones used to kill American citizens.) This is unprecedented for that newspaper. So even DemocRATS are getting alarmed by this guy. Now we learn that Rep. Jones used to be a DemocRAT himself, and he’s alarmed by what Panetta told Sessions–that Barry only needs UN approval to commit troops and that Congress is basically just there to rubberstamp what Barry decides. People are waking up.

  17. Something to consider:

    MO National Guard “fired” a sergeant from a job where he was part of honor guards at military funerals. Why? Because some co-workers claimed he was a neo-Nazi. Allegedly, he made “racist” comments on the job (others say all of them did and they were razzing) and he belongs to an organization that the Southern Poverty Law Center [SPLC] (racist, extremist, radical progressives) has labeled “extremist” and “supremacist”. Apparently, the military has a policy against members belonging to groups that espouse “extremist” and/or “supremacist” views or espouse such “causes”. It’s said that the SPLC monitors websites, looking for members of these groups and ratting them out wherever possible. They claim that this guardsman had identities on social media and made “racist” statements against, for example, illegal immigration! When his enlistment is up, they may refuse to allow him to re-enlist, on the same basis. (Where’s the ACLU?) I’m not FOR people making Nazi-like or “supremacist” statements or holding such beliefs. But last time I checked, this is America, where we DON’T have a thought police. What’s IRONIC in the extreme is that this is the same U.S. military that allowed a Muslim JIHADIST who associated with KNOWN enemies of the USA, espoused Islamist jihadists, to remain IN the military. Had they identified Major Hasan as holding “supremacist” and “extremist” views and booted him, 13 people would still be breathing in Ft. Hood, Texas. Consider this, too: How many current members of the U.S. military espouse Critical Race Theory, an “extremist” and “supremacist” ideology? I can think of one–Barack Hussein Obama II, Commander in Chief. Another strike for ineligibility. He has espoused extreme supremacist views. He, like Mr. Wooten, should be removed from his job and not allowed to “reenlist.”

    • “The military has struggled for decades with extremists in its ranks. After long denying a problem, the Pentagon in November 2009 toughened its stance on supremacist activity.

      A policy in effect since 1996 had prohibited “active participation in supremacist organizations, including rallying, fundraising, recruiting and organizing,” the Southern Poverty Law Center said. But some interpreted that policy to mean that military members still could be members of hate groups and post racist comments on social network sites and in emails, the center said. The new policy bans such activity. While not eliminating all extremists in the military, the change made it easier for commanders to discipline troops involved in such activities, the center said.”

      Yes, we know they didn’t eliminate ALL the extremists. Had they done so, more would be breathing today. Did Hasan fundraise, recruit, and organize? I think so. He also MURDERED. All this Wooten stands accused of is arguably making racist statements and allegedly belonging to a group that the SPLC doesn’t care for. I don’t care for the SPLC. They’re radical, hating, extremist, supremacist, commie-loving progressives. Should they be barred from serving in the military? (Not that such as they are likely to enlist in the military.)

    • You have to be careful with these articles. They want you to believe the militia are supremacist groups. The public is ignorant on miliatias.

      • I know what you mean, believe me I have to sort out so much sometimes I feel as clouded as ever even though I gain a little more insight. For instance it’s really quited confusing ,but communist in many countries hate socialist and vice versa, Muslims didn’t like communists in Indonesia,while it seems the socialists there disliked US, Dutch, Brittish Emperialism ,especially US socialists are antimperialists but many are as antiglobal as most conservatives.Then the term nationalist means so many different things to groups all over.Well I know this is not exactly what you’re talking about,I’m off a bit, but it is really difficult to classify all militia as any one definition or type as a supremacy group. I haven’t read your article yet. I will though.


    I love this one. People plastered “Breitbart is here” and “Stop raping people” posters all over where the Poopstockers were hanging, including their port-a-potties. Hmm. I wonder who supplied those? Maybe they deliberately chose St. Patrick’s Day because they knew the city would have port-a-potties for the parades and then the Poopstockers wouldn’t have to supply any for themselves, AS THE CITY MADE TEA PARTIERS DO. The OWS people have been completely accommodated while the Tea Partiers were forced to get permits, buy insurance, supply port-a-potties, and clean up after themselves. No doubt, that’s another angle OWS thought of–the Irish paraders and the city will clean up the parade route, so that saves OWS money, too. For generous commies, they sure are tight with their dollars.

  19. Do you guys think that WH insider is for real? I’m just not sure. If he was for real, when I don’t see how he could last long with all the Obots around. Surely someone at the WH would have figured it all out.

    • On the fence here Kitty…… much fake and drama out there hard to tell no ?

      • Yeah, there’s a lot of stuff going on. Perhaps it’s true, though. Maybe BO just too arrogant to think it’s about him.

    • Hey Kitty,

      I was on the fence, too, but both WHI and WSI have many too many predictions that have come full circle.

      One thing’s for sure: both have not and cannot utter one word of their interviews to anyone. ANYONE! We know how things tend to leak and if that happened, they wouldn’t be around for long.

      I pray for both of them.

      BTW, eyes are peeled for the autopsy and toxicology reports for Breitbart and I have a forensics pal watching from an ‘official’ perch. Should perhaps be another few weeks before any results are back.

      • Can’t wait until we find out something.

        • …but we have to think about the possibility that the *real* results will not be divulged.

          It will be suspect if the results come back as ‘natural causes.’ My bunch in the know at work are looking at cyanide. That would cause the face to turn cherry red and drop the person to the ground immediately, as was reported by the eyewitness who saw Breitbart collapse.

          We wait.

    • It”s alot of reading with little information given out.

  20. This is why our founding fathers created both a House and a Senate, and a two-party system.
    but if O bama has his way they will be neutralized :evil:.

  21. Also, you know the Breitbart video clips? I’m kind of inclined to think that possibly the really whopper stuff hasn’t been released yet.

    • I hope so and I hope it gets released.

      • This person explains Critical Race Theory and interestingly enough, cites the same quote I cited the other day, where Barry talked about the ONE of the “tragedies” of the Civil Rights Movement. It was a tragedy. Who knew?

        • She cites this case which I don’t think we talked about here. I forgot to mention it.

          A study that alleges that blacks are disciplined more harshly than whites and Asians in public schools. Thomas Sowell wrote, “the biggest hoax of the past two generations is still going strong — namely, the hoax that statistical differences in outcomes for different groups are due to the way other people treat those groups.

          The latest example of this hoax is the joint crusade of the Department of Education and the Department of Justice against schools that discipline black males more often than other students. According to Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, this disparity in punishment violates the “promise” of “equity.””

          My thoughts when I heard this was that there’s a statistical imbalance here. Asians are far better behaved than whites and blacks. Whites are disproportionately better behaved than blacks. So what’s the solution?

          Should we make all equal by forcing Asians and whites to misbehave in school more often? Do we need remedial “bad behavior” classes for them, so that their discipline rates go up to expected levels?

          What about females? They’re not acting up in proportion to their representation in the population. We need federal grants to study that and federal programs to make sure women get equal opportunity in misbehaving.

          If the fact is that black males and white males are more often disciplined than Asian males, then does that mean that educators are ALSO racist against white males and in favor of Asians?

          But this is what you get with CRT. Quotas of ALL kinds. Special treatment for certain groups into infinity. A caste system with “persons of color” (but not those Asians) enshrined at the top. It’s only “fair,” isn’t it?

    • I’ve wondered that myself. I hope there’s more. Of course Obama’s team has probably got several October surprises and has most likely looked for anything that even hints of some affair on any of the candidates, to be sure. That’s their modus operandi.

  22. PHOTOS….check these out !
    “Our Irish Heritage” ~
    (under the title hit right arrow and open up to)
    Michelle Obama’s Mirrow … photos are side by side….
    great shots can we pick a winner/loser?
    (move this if there is a better slot for it …o.k.)

  23. Alinsky article…. in the newest National Review
    check it out!

  24. This may be worth listening to:The Brotherhood of Darkness
    1:43:11 – 5 years ago

    Dr. Stanley Monteith. It is impossible to understand the unfolding of world events without the information contained in this video. What was the origin of the Council on Foreign Relations, and what is its relationship to Freemasonry, Theosophy, Socialism and Communism? This video is felt by many researchers to be the best single source of information on the movements working to create a New World Order. No researcher, or seeker for the truth should be without a copy of this highly acclaimed presentation.

    • don’t recognize Stanley Monteith ,but I do a lot of reading like this…great sources for understanding what’s happening and all the wars too.
      This one by Nesta Webster is unusually good too, but you’ll need lots of time for reading and studying it. Put together with other sources , this was excellent progression from the many secret societies , mystic, socialistic origins, into the occultic middle ages. I really got alot from it that furthered what I had already been reading. I’ll Check yours out too. Thanks Tdr, always like to check this stuff out. I’m getting a full on library just about now. Thanks.

  25. An article about the “executive-order PANIC”:

    “But are the cries of martial law and expanding executive power justified?

    No, says William A. Jacobson, associate clinical professor at Cornell Law School.

    “If someone wants to make the argument that this is an expansion of presidential powers, then do so based on actual language,” warns Jacobson. “There is enough that Obama actually does wrong without creating claims which do not hold up to scrutiny.””

    So he just repeats what Hot Air said, but I’d thought he was going to talk about the phenomenon OF the “panic” and analyze why that might be and what it portends.

  26. Got this from Drudge:

    “Supermodel Elle Macpherson told shock jock Howard Stern Tuesday that she’s pulling for Barack Obama to be reelected.

    “I’m living in London and I’m socialist,” she told her host. “What do you expect?””

    Well, I expect her to walk her talk. Where’s the money, Elle? Aren’t you going to share your mega-wealth with the rest of us, since you’re a socialist? Aren’t you going to come live in the USA and let Barry redistribute YOUR wealth? Why do you live in London and not here, since you want a say in OUR GOVERNMENT?

    Btw, the woman is an Australian and she’s worth a cool $60 million. So, being a socialist, when is she going to share that wealth with the less fortunate? That’s all you can call it, good fortune. It’s not like she didn’t get rich and famous on the luck of the draw from the gene pool. Beauty’s only skin deep. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    Talking to Howard Stern:

    “MACPHERSON: I think foreigners like him. He’s very popular. [Over there!]

    STERN: Don’t we look good having a black president and everything? Makes us kind of cool.

    MACPHERSON: I think it’s more about his policy. But you know there are I understand that there are a lot of people who don’t, you know, don’t want change. “We want change. We want change.” And he says, “I’ll implement change,” and you go, “Oh, actually, I don’t bleeping feel like I want change. It’s too difficult.”

    And Obama’s media wonder why folks think he’s a socialist. [Last comment by the author of the story, Noel Sheppard.]”

    FOREIGNERS LIKE HIM. Well, understandable. He’s one of them. They all know he’s a socialist. Actually, he’s a communist. Since MacPherson IS A CAPITALIST, it’s apparent she hasn’t a clue what a socialist IS. This is how Muslims all know and recognize that he’s a Muslim.

  27. Sheriff Joe: Obama Investigation Could Lead to Ballot Denial for Obama, Tons of Shocking Information

    • Nice historical background and it is remembered well. We were “Breitbarts” then and reported the information about Ayers, Edward Said, Percy Sutton, and Khalidi and their relationship to Obama. Those (anti-Semetic, anti-Israel) LA tapes are still in a locked safe at the LA Times.

      • Did we know that there’re two interviews with this mailman? Did I read it right? Are there videos or audios of the interviews?

        • I ran across this article that we discussed at length at the time. A blast from the past:

          Ayers helping the Annenberg obots block access to Barry’s records there.

          As for Barry and Billy Ayers knowing each other as early as 1988, that may be true. In 1988, Michelle was working at a law firm, Sidley-Austin, where Bernardine Dohrn just happened to also be employed. The next year, 1989, Barry was hired there as an intern. How he met her, don’t ya know? Or so the tall tale goes. iirc (and it’s possible that I don’t) somebody way back when at TD’s said that Michelle went to a high school that had a special program run by or developed by none other than Bill Ayers. So Barry most certainly met Bernardine by 1989, although supposedly she no longer worked there but was at Northwestern U (in Chicago) and it’s likely he had met her husband at least by then, too, if not before. Was Michelle also “helped along” in her career by Bill and Bernie? It would be interesting to see about MO’s high school. I’m still laughing about her yearbook photo. Here’s where she went to high school:

          And then there’s this old story by Andrew McCarthy that posits that Barry met Ayers when he went to Columbia college in NYC:

          Lots to brush up on there.

    • Event organiser Silvio Carrasquillo said: ‘There are a number of characteristics we look for – skin color and the eyebrows.’But according to Mr Carrasquillo, a perfect presidential head shape was the winning element for Mr Perez.‘There is part of Obama’s head like a little ball, in the back, and Carlos has the profile.’

  28. The attorney for Manning took his case to the UN! The judge in this case is Col. Denise Lind. This is the same traitor judge who presided over LtC Lakin’s case?
    Within a couple weeks, Panetta, Dempsey, NAACP and now Manning are quoting superiority for the UN? Something is up.

    UN: Army Private Accused in WikiLeaks Case Was Tortured by U.S
    Joe Wolverton, II
    Sunday, 18 March 2012 Snips

    Last week PFC Bradley Manning’s lawyer submitted a motion to dismiss the case against his client. Manning (left), who is accused of passing classified documents to WikiLeaks, is charged with 22 crimes, including giving aid to the enemy as defined in the Espionage Act (18 USC Chapter 37)
    At the hearing on March 15 conducted in Ft. Meade, Maryland, attorneys for the 24-year-old from Crescent, Oklahoma, argued that government investigators mishandled the transfer of documents during the discovery phase of the proceedings against the Army private. At a subsequent hearing the following day, two of the motions were addressed, while one was left undecided.
    In other news in the case of PFC Bradley Manning, the Special Rapporteur on Torture for the United Nations has formally accused the U.S. government of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment of Manning during his incarceration.

    In a document submitted last month to the U.N. Human Rights Council, Juan Mendez outlined the alleged mistreatment of Manning.

    Mendez reported that the U.S. government’s “prolonged confinement” of PFC Manning was inhuman. The relevant section of Mendez’s report declares, “Mr. Manning was held in solitary confinement for twenty-three hours a day following his arrest in May 2010 in Iraq, and continuing through his transfer to the brig at Marine Corps Base Quantico.”
    Perhaps of the most interest to constitutionalists is the fact that regardless of the severity of the crimes of which he is now accused, Private Manning was held in solitary confinement without being apprised of the crimes with which he was being charged, allegedly tortured by the U.S. government, and because of his supposed indirect aid to al-Qaeda, he was denied the due process guaranteed to all citizens by the Constitution.

    This may become the new standard of American due process and habeas corpus in our post-NDAA world.

  29. Another attractive woman from the left. Yikes.

    Frances Fox Piven: ‘Time for Another Surge From the Bottom’
    March 18, 2012 Snips

    After predicting earlier this month that “we’ll see action” from the Occupy Wall Street movement in the spring, leftist professor and activist Frances Fox Piven said it’s “time for another surge from the bottom.” Piven, making her comments in a video for the left-leaning magazine The Nation, said soaring inequality has always been the “default position” in America.

    [1:30 – In the 1970s, business began to organize to take over American politics.. electoral politics…Congress of the United States, the parties, and the presidency!]

    She continued, “It’s been time for another surge from the bottom for quite a while, and some of us have been waiting.”

      • Does she realize that she and her cohorts are among the “people at the top” who are trying to impose on us from the top, not “from the bottom?”

        These are the very people who ignore the will of We the People and try to RAM ONTO THOSE OF US “BELOW” THEIR VERSION OF HOW THINGS OUGHT TO BE INSTEAD OF HOW WE THE PEOPLE WANT THEM TO BE.

        Like Elle MacPherson, when will Fox-Piven share HER WEALTH with us? Frances, who died and left you QUEEN?

        If the majority of the people believed as she believes, there’d be no reason to counteract any “take over.” The people would en masse vote in what Frances wants. But the people OPPOSE HER VISION OF A COMMUNIST STATE. That’s why they try to do it by a socialist “take over” and STEALTH.

        Did you know we have Frances to thank for motor voter, and thus all the dead people, felons, and illegal aliens voting? And thus why they also fiercely oppose voter ID’s at the polls? TY, Frannie. Fran is still a member of DSA, which Barry was fond of, too. Democratic SOCIALISTS of America. To know how deep these commies have tunneled into our society–she was president of the American Sociological Association in 2006. In 2010, as a professor, she made about $145,000, but that doesn’t include her income from books. I’d say Fran is in the 1% that OWS loves to hate. Wouldn’t you? Does Fran pay her “fair share” of taxes?

        And while looking for Fran’s salary, I ran across a most-excellent article by our friend and fellow blogger Dr. Eowyn. Highly recommended: St. Michael preserve us, and I say that from the bottom of my heart.

        • A perfect bookend for Fran’s attitude, the attitude of Tom Ayers. From Jack Cashill’s article about the postman who should have rung someone’s bell at least once:

          “When Hulton met Tom Ayers, they talked about working conditions at the Post Office. “I couldn’t believe how he responded,” Hulton told Diamond. “He started to talk about workers having to struggle to survive and about peasants and the proletariat. It made me think later that he might be a Marxist!” Hulton would tell Corsi, “I had this uncomfortable feeling that he thought he knew about my situation as a working person better than I did, that he knew what was best for me.””

          That about sums it up, Mr. Hulton. Joe the Plumber can relate, as can we. They DO think they know our situations better than we do; they Do think they know what’s best for us, better than we do; and they DO think, therefore, that they should RULE US LESSER BEINGS FOR OUR OWN GOOD.

          And they act as if they despise paternalism and slavery.

      • you know this wicked witch arrived in this Country from Canada as a child and naturalized in 1951. Do immigrants take an oath? She’s been trying to overthrow the US government and splinter families all her life here.

        is she a traitor?

        i can’t wait too see her striped stockinged feet curl up when the house falls on her.

        she should have been deported years ago.

        • Was thinking on this last night. What kind of mind (and conscience) does it take for a person to sit around, plan and plot, and come up with a theory like Cloward-Piven? A strategy to deliberate CAUSE a crisis by overloading welfare rolls with the planned result being that economies collapse, causing untold misery for everyone.

          Originally, she claimed, she and her cronies believed that not everyone “entitled” to welfare benefits got them and so to sign them all up would collapse the system. Well, they must have discovered that Americans are too self-sufficient and in reality don’t NEED “benefits” or reject being on the dole, so they HAD TO start using other means to force/nudge ineligible people onto the dole. Thus, we have a majority of kids getting free lunches (and now breakfast, dinner, and snacks, too) at school, massive numbers of ILLEGAL ALIENS collecting benefits, groups like ACORN being used to help people lie about their assets so they “qualify” for benefits, making up new “required” benefits like free day care or babysitters, free contraception, Obamacare, on and on. That’s what people don’t seem to realize. These people don’t CARE that Obamacare will ruin the economy. It’s their goal. Anything to force the DELIBERATE economic collapse of our government.

          Evil. But they lie and use the excuse that their real goal is to “end poverty.” So deliberately, with MALICE AFORETHOUGHT, they set out to cause everybody in this country to suffer economically, so that elite, effete, egotistical snobs like Piven and the Obamas can then rule us and make us live the way they think is best for us. Under COMMUNISM, with a twist. One that pays back the “whites” for what happened to people generations ago.

          • What kind of people think these things up you ask? Sadistic people. Or Mainstream-adaptable psychopaths. Ethnic cleansing under the guise of responsibility to those with lesser. Am I getting anywhere near close?

    “Still the Alinsky playbook” ~john fund ~ pg.18-20
    Usurper…(Pres) Obama continues to dance with the one who brung him!!
    Cover has “John Belushi” …March 19, 2012 (on upper left corner)
    (I found it, not sure we can read it for free) Miri can you look?

  31. 2011 Gov’t Study Asks: What Happens if Someone Nukes D.C.?
    March 16, 2012

    Have you ever wondered what would happen if Washington, DC, suffered a nuclear attack? Apparently, some of DC’s higher-ups were wondering the same thing and, like everything else they’re curious about, they decided to conduct a study.

    Turns out, 10-kiloton nuke would be very, very bad for D.C., Northern Virginia, and Maryland (shocker, I know).

  32. Has anyone seen a readable copy of Stanley Ann’s birth certificate? I’ve only seen one that is very very dark and almost impossible to read.

  33. I’m still intrigued that her mother signed her name “Madeline”

  34. Exactly! The only “reasonable” explanation I can think of is maybe she was recuperating from the birth, they wanted the paperwork done and someone else signed it for her. Not legal of course, but I suppose it could have happened that Gramps gave the go ahead and a nurse filled in the signature or something? Otherwise…nobody sane misspells their own name. I would really like to see a clear copy though, it seems like that is also the signature for Stanley Armour that looks exactly like many of Stanley Ann’s signatures .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s