Is Obama’s Goose Cooked? UPDATE #3

©Bridgette @ WTPOTUS 2012




Come one, Come All, We Are Having a Barbeque!

 January 26, 2012, 9:00 a.m., Atlanta, Georgia

Orly Taitz  won in the battle of the Georgia  Motions to Quash where Obama’s Attorney,  Michael Jablonski,  said Obama didn’t want to appear because he was to busy being pRresident!   Jablonski and Obama believed he  was above the law and because Obama was already elected, he didn’t have to prove his eligibility.   Judge Malihi disagreed  and said bring those documents too!  See you on January 26th!

Imagine the Secret Service escort to court and Obama walking in to see Sheriff Joe Arpaio standing there!   Will Sheriff Joe be taking his Cold Case Posse evidence with him to show to the judge?  Will Loretta Fuddy Duddy  think she is above the law too?  Thus far, Hawaii stated they don’t have to appear in court.   So did the person asking for an out from the Inspector General’s office.

The judge appears to be the real deal…can it be true that Obama’s  eligibility issue will finally be heard on the evidence and its merits?   Six more days will tell, until then, pray really hard for Judge Malihi to withstand all the threats and intimidation  that may be coming his way.

The judge’s decision will be posted as soon as it is available.

This is what we want to see next.

Lots of Geese!


Note:  To catch up on all the Georgia news, read the Georgia thread.


January 21,  2: 48 a.m. CST

People, this issue  has gotten traction.  I just checked and searched Google with the terms, ” Judge in Georgia Orders President“,  and believe it or not … there are thousands  of articles.  The search showed “About 49,100,000 results.”  Using the title of the article below, the results were shown as “About 4,370,000 results.”   Try it and see if the numbers have increased.

The first mainstream one seen was from the AP and published by ABC News of all places, and I assume that that others picked up the wired news from the AP to print.  NBC News is carrying the identical story.  Note the date error of the 21st instead of the 26th for the court date.

Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing.
Atlanta, January 21, 2012

A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.

Ga. Judge Orders President to Appear at Hearing ATLANTA January 21, 2012 (AP)

A judge has ordered President Barack Obama to appear in court  in Atlanta for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.

It’s one of many such lawsuits that have been filed across the  country, so far without success. A Georgia resident made the complaint, which is intended to keep Obama’s name off the state’s
ballot in the March presidential primary.

An Obama campaign aide says any attempt to involve the president personally will fail and such complaints around the country have no merit.

The hearing is set for Thursday before an administrative judge.

Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi on Friday denied a motion by the president’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to show up.


Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to
Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge – 1/20/2012


Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the
Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the
United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena
compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing.

This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony… [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.” Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).

Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena.

However, the Court’s rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party’s counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.


UPDATE #2:  January 25

Is this proof that Obama has no records?  His attorney wants to defy the judge’s subpoena! Not that something like this wasn’t expected. Orly posted the letter.  Emphasis is mine.

January 25, 2012

Hon. Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State
214 State Capitol
Atlanta, Georgia 30334

via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.

Re:  Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Secretary Kemp:

This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings.  At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements.  As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia –  that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office.  Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate.  Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.

For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.

It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country.  The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website.  “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country.  Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.

Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs.  One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country.  Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.”  She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records.  She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011.  Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.

In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law.  When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….

As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda.  She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.

All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok.  He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them.  Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority.  See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).

The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued.  A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time.  Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1).  Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law.  Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373.  (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot.  Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates.  O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193.  Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

Very truly yours,

Georgia State Bar Number 385850
Attorney for President Barack Obama

cc:  Hon. Michael Malihi (c/o Kim Beal (
Van Irion, Esq. (
Orly Taitz, Esq. (
Mark Hatfield, Esq. (
Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. (
Stefan Ritter, Esq. (
Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. (
Darcy Coty, Esq. (
Andrew B. Flake, Esq. (


UPDATE #3  January 25   7:44 pm

Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp decisively put down Obama’s sleazy attempts to suppress the hearings.

The hearings are ON!

Their non attendance is at their own peril!

Ballot Challenge
Below is a screenprint of the letter.

Emphasis Added


Michael Jablonski
260 Brighton Road, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30309

RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:

I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of State Administrative Hearings (“OSAH”) has handled the candidate challenges involving your client and advising me that you and your client will “suspend” participation in the administrative proceeding. While I regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to an administrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.

As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As the referring agency, the Secretary of State’s Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearings scheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, I do not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.

In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judge to report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of the report, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge. Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.

I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to this matter.

Brian P. Kemp
Georgia Secretary of State

249 responses to “Is Obama’s Goose Cooked? UPDATE #3

  1. I wonder what Obama had planned for Thursday? He better cancel his plans, he’s wanted in court. ha ha loser Obama.

  2. Courtesy of the Advance Indiana blog [with my emphasis added]:
    “Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

    In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony… [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.” Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5). Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court’s rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party’s counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
    Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.
    SO ORDERED, this 20th day of January, 2012.”

    The judge can cite the law; apparently, Barry’s lawyers cannot. That doesn’t seem to bode well for their case. It’s not the judge’s job to instruct them on the law. That’s what law school and law libraries are for. Apparently, Judge Michael Malihi isn’t impressed with the identity (whatever it is) of this defendant. Or with the apparent arrogance of his attorney, who must believe that just representing the rich and powerful carries so much weight in court that he needn’t bother with doing his homework and instead brings his Alinsky tactics there to use to ridicule Dr. Taitz.

    • The notice to appear was from a different plaintiff/attorney, right? I remember looking at it the other day and thinking, now that is how it’s done – tight, not sloppy.

  3. Haahaahaa…love the photo! I just hope that he doesn’t try to think of a way around this. Don’t forget, he thinks that he’s outside of observing the law.

  4. Hope it doesn’t put a damper on the Wednesday night party at the White House.

    • Good point! He should beg the judge to move the hearing time so he doesn’t have to fly too early after a Big Night with Wagyu beef and who knows what else?

      • I can see the headlines: ‘Obama flys to Atlanta,the KKK state, after Rondezvous with Goofey, for the Ride of His Life.’

      • barky is rehearsing for his next fundraiser.

        he can sing, yes he can and I am impressed, I admit. he can sing. just doesn’t make him a full blooded American.

        $38,500 per person post hearing respite. anyone?
        3 pm Atlanta. All Aboard!

        • He’s going back to a simpler place in time…
          He always dreamed that someday he’d be a star..

          A one way ticket back to the life he once knew.
          Going back to find a simpler place in time.

          Here’s hopin’ he’ll be serving time, servin’ time
          I’ve got to know, I’ve got to know.

  5. Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Pa January 20, 2012 at 2:21 pm |
    Although this is a step forward, this victory for Orly may not be all it’s cracked up to be by her. I mean, this might only result in Obama’s attorneys, or Obama hismelf, coming to court and presenting copies of the birth certificates that were already posted online. If indeed there is language in the Georgia law that actually requires a candidate to produce an original vaulted, long-form birth certificate, then we may have something. But if it does not, there will not be much new produced by way of this subpoena. If the language does exist requiring candidates to prove eligibility by way of a notarized vaulted, long-form birth certificate, Obama’s lawyers’ next move is to move it to the appelate level claiming this is extraordinary language and likely unconstitutional. And you know what will happen of course. Appeals courts will side with Obama. And I have no idea what will happen, in terms of actionability, regarding the other items Orly is subpoenaing.
    Anyway, this is great news but should be approached cautiously.

    • i have pretty much commented the same on this. One area, I recall (there’s been so much talk now,don’t know which is from actual language from the judges supena),requesting his many legal papers,the ORIGINAL type written birth certificate issued by the state of Hawaii or what ever place of his birth and all papers pertaining to this,i.e. adoption , name changes and all papers reasonably pertaining to this, all passports in any form from wherever issued and legal document pertaining to these,ect. Now this is not unusual language(or extraorinary language).I don’t see where they would call this extraordinary,but it’s the “reasonable part” that can be argued. He may strike that some small piece of evidence they may not be able to produce is reasonably OK. Or that they have supplied substantial enough emount of documents that he can make the determinations needed so may not require a further device . But so far nothing seems unreasonable.This seems it’s up to the judges discretion…and by O’s lawyer treating this lightly or pompously from the get go may make the judge ‘cranky’. I think they are hoping to insinuate to the judge the ‘PEOPLES’ feelings in this matter in hopes of influencing him in that way. Hope it doesn’t work.

    • i think the administrative hearing rules say that a copy of a document is okay but the other party can request the original to do a comparison and there are some other minutia I can’t remember right now, but basically they should be able to get the originals in. A lot depends on the judge and so far it seems like malahi is legit.

      • If this judge was not requesting O.s absolute original birth cert. that is housed in the Hawaii records he would have specified that and the case would be senseless and he wouldnt’t need ms.fuddy either, he could just ask bo and his lawyers to produce a facimili of it. so expect the real deal or their version of a real deal anyway. All the talk of what we may get is useless. When asked to present papers relevant to your passport, you don’t bring in a copy of your passport or something saying one exists. Same with this silly very abused birth certif. He specified original typewritten birth cert.

        • This is an identity verification and you can use witnesses ,which by now most of them are conveniently dead, so all pieces of original legal documentation,showing original names,name changes,parent, guardians, adoptions, adopting persons verifications,and any papers showing any changes,biological claimant and verification if child was born without the fathers signature at the time of birth and so on. This is what he seemed to be asking for.If any of your papers have been marked thru or written over this even has to be clarified and witnesses as to how and why. These are not unusual cases. Of course in Bo’s case it’s all unusual. This is what my father used to do. So I halfway know what I am talking about. Only halfway mindyou ,as I didn’t really pay that close attention to his work,but I’ve heard of hundreds of unusual cases as I listened to judges ,and lawyers talk over the many unusual circumstances in cases and hearings. My neighbor was a federal judge ran for gov. one time long ago. While I’m not too brushed up on procedure anymore , this case could be really a thriller or go nowhere just because of something unforseem. It is more interesting to notice any posturing on O. and his lawyer’s part,because you may get a feel for what they want the public to think or not notice.

          • I did work for my father while he was judge in superiour court. I also worked in the Clerks office when I was very young filing all court dockets and writng up summons for court.My entire life has been around the courts from criminal law . Other family members were part of the judicial system,criminal lawyers,and chief investigators. I have not revealed this mainly because it doesn’t make me all that much more knowledgeable than anyone else,but I for sure am familiar with how this works. I have sat in on many court proceedings in my life. I lived one block from the county court house. By the way.when I was home on vacation I got to hear all the talk on J. Edwards all over the coffee shops , all over town. I met the lawyers leaving the courthose the day John was there. He was the talk of the town and you could overhear some really incredible stuff. If I had wanted to I could have sat down in the courtroom, as I recognized the lawyers in the case,but I really have never wanted to know the details of John Edwards life. I know exactly where he used to live. My neighbor now was a neigbor of his when he lived in Robins. .
            For sure Obama’s lawyer in this case is definately just the conduit for a mass of lawyers right now that are probably pulling everything out of their bag of old tricks, things we haven’t thought of till court day. That judge better get alot of sleep and have a lot of coffe on the morning of court, because the wimpy seeming lawyer is just the tip of the long arm of their arsenal. At least that’s what I think. Then we have of course the criminal element and that of course is unforseen and we know they aint’t going to go down on account of this one little ole Malihi.

          • There are some things that we should have looked at more closely back when we were looking over Annes different papers. Her divorce papers for one…..I may have missed out ,and you guys could have done invesigating that I am not aware of on Annes lawyers. But just from thie little I searched, something told me her lawyers were your typicl divorce lawyers. That law firm was housed, I believe in Madelyns Bank of Hawaii. They were real estate lawyers, probate of wills, that sort of thing. Somewhere I came across lawyers associated with lots of Hawaii money scandals and they were mentioned. Something to do with Bishops trust. Don’t remember much on it anymore, but one of the lawyers associated with that group had a framed false Columbia degree certificate on his wall. His hole persona was a creation. Wonder who did that for him. Wish I could find the info again.. Did anyone else find information on Ann’s lawyer?

    • He can’t produce a bogus copy of a birth certificate. His lawyers wouldn’t dare to, if they value their licenses to practice. If he produces a copy of what’s on his website, it won’t be certified and embossed and so won’t be prima facie evidence of squat. It has to be authentic to be evidence. There are such things as rules of evidence. There doesn’t have to be a special law, if a valid subpoena was issued and the judge upholds it. When a judge says produce something, you have to produce it. Orly subpoenaed the original, I’m sure.

    • Yes! Finally, what I have talked about! Orly is asking for the Original Log Book of Birth Records with Obama’s name in it and the corresponding microfiche. She is asking that Loretta Fuddy be commanded to appear in court in Atlanta by Judge Rhonda Nishimura’s court in Hawaii.

      “produce a book of birth records with the original birth certificate of Mr. Barack Obama, as well as corresponding microfiche film.”

      • I guess Fuddy will have to get O’s permission to show the “book” and microfiche. Or maybe not according to the Hawaiian rules. But what the heck, he will be there, and if needed, and she can get his signature at that time if not before. Will these letters be available and part of an FOIA request later?

        Under rule 338-18(9) access to the original records is allowed
        (9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;

        This court is a court of competent jurisdiction.


          From Comment 48:

          The shopping list what the Plaintiffs are after. A real president wouldn’t even sweat this stuff and would easily produce this stuff below. I personally could do it within hours if requested or ordered.

          “Attorney Mark Hatfield on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Powell filed a notice to produce records against Obama in the Georgia Ballot Challenge. Attorney Hatfield also filed a motion for determination of placement of burden of proof in the challenge. Also Judge Malihi issued an order today related to the motion for determination which is linked below. All 3 new filings linked below.

          From the Notice to Produce:

          Pursuant to OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.19, Defendant Barack Obama is hereby notified to be and appear before the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings, the Honorable Michael M. Malihi presiding, at the Fulton County Justice Center Building, 161 Pryor Street, Courtroom G-40, Atalanta, Georgia on January 26, 2012 at 9:00 a.m., and to bring with him into said Court the following items to be used as evidence by the Plaintiffs in the above-styled case:

          (a) One (1) of the two (2) original certified copies of Defendant Barack Obama’s (“long form”) Certificate of Live Birth as referenced in the four (4) pages of Exhibit “A” attached;

          (b) All medical, religious, administrative, or other records of or related to Defendant Barack Obama’s birth;

          (c) Any and all United States Passports, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama;

          (d) Any and all passport, passport applications, and passport-related records for Defendant Barack Obama from any country, nation, or sovereignty;

          (e) Any and all college and university admission information, both undergraduate and postgraduate, for Defendant Barack Obama, including, but not limited to, admission applications; letters of recommendation; school transcripts; financial aid applications; scholarship applications; and any and all correspondence awarding admission, financial aid, scholarships, or the like;

          (f) Any and all applications and accompanying materials submitted by or for Defendant Barack Obama to the State Bar of Illinois, the State Supreme Court of Illinois, the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, and any other similar entity regulating the admission to the practice of law;

          (g) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant Barack Obama;

          (h) Any and all other documents, materials, and papers having any relation to the subject of the birthplace, citizenship, denizenship, and national origin of Defendant’s father, Barack Obama Sr.

          (i) All correspondence between Defendant Barack Obama and any other person, firm, political party, or entity discussing Defendant’s status vel non as a natural born Citizen pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

          Defendant will note that the preceding items are requested hereby, whether they pertain to Defendant under his name Barack Obama or any other name, including but not limited to Barack Hussein Obama II; Barry Soetoro; Barry Soebarkah; Barry Obama, or the like.

      • is asking for the Original Log Book of Birth Records with Obama’s name in it and the corresponding microfiche!

        Missing one ?

      • Thinking about it more, if Barry does try to present a printed out copy of what’s on his website, Orly should remind the judge that his lawyers already called that “hearsay”, so they agree, too, that only the ORIGINAL vouched for by the HDOH is not hearsay.

    • Definition: Rogatory letters n.

      A commission from one judge to another judge requesting the latter to examine a witness in his or her court, with the testimony to be provided to the first judge.

      Rogatory letters can be sent to a court in a sister state or to a court or judge in a foreign country (usually they are sent through diplomatic channels). Granting the request is a matter of comity—courtesy and respect—between courts.

      Rogatory letters n. a written request by a judge to a judge in another state asking that a witness in the other state have his/her testimony taken in the other state’s court for use in the local court case. (See: deposition, testimony, witness)

    • Orly requested that Fuddy appear in court with “the book” under persons having interested; Clause 9 of the definition of person’s having tangible interest in requesting the original birth documents in the State of Hawaii.

    • Someone finally clued her into civil procedure rules. That’s what she had to do in the first place – take the georgia subpoena and the docs showing its a valid case (that’s the letters rogatory in simple terms) to a Hawaii court and get the Hawaii court to issue a subpoena.

  6. Ya know, bottom line is this:

    what’s the big fn secret? what is it that is being hidden from the American people and the immigrants seeking citizenship?

    why is barky adamant in hiding and fighting the release of his records?

    Bottom line: why?

    why a motion to quash? busted.

    • What IF there is no log book with his name? What IF there is no microfiche? What IF it all comes to light, that they forged a BC and can’t produce the records to back up the one put online?

      I want to see the rung neck and the goose cooked!

      • the answer is disgusting.

        caution. prepare to cower. a liar shoving the truth down your throat.

        my question: if the court finds during the hearing that barky is a liar, will he be permitted to return to DC protected by the Secret Service or will he have to hail a cab?

        • Oh good one! Make him walk home…to Chicago.

          The Secret Service will no longer have to worry about taking a bullet for him. They can stand down or get out of the way.

          I hope Congress is getting the papers ready. Who serves the eviction papers for 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.? They better assign someone to take an inventory before it is packed up too. Didn’t Hillary take off with the antique furniture or was it the silverware?

        • Yeah A BIG Yellow TaXI. You don’t know what you Got til it’s Gone.(Huray!). They paved Paradise and Put up a Parking Lot.
          Actually ,It would really nice if the Georgia State Prison Bus came for him.

    • I think the mother, whoever it was is not married, therefore O. is legally a cit. of HI. I could be Way Wrong though. I think if Obama Sr’s name is on anything it is something only after the fact.

  7. Somehow I expect that the date of Jan. 26th won’t suit the usurper. He will say he has high level meetings or some such thing, so they will request the date be changed while they figure out what to do next. Or they will call in Mr. Big Guns, who protected Obama in all the previous lawsuits, Mr. Bauer.

    • yeah, something is brewing as they have plans to thwart. that’s what they do all day long everyday.

      hopefully, Judge Malihi is honorable and an American at heart. if that’s the case, we will know soon enough. Maybe some important person can hold a $38,500. per plate luncheon that day and barky will be compelled to arrive.

      • Maybe Barky’s own people are ready to ditch him. That would be exciting. Maybe before something that’s going down that bigger than Obama and his little piece of paper is about to get exposed, so they need to move Obama out and get somebody else for Democrat nominee.Just tossing the idea around.

      • Remember Soros’ warning that if Obama didn’t rule by executive order that he’d find his replacement. I know we talked about it.

        Bridgette – Submitted on 2010/11/10 at 9:51 am

      • I have been worried about that too. What happens if criminality comes out before the election? They put in a replacement candidate – Hillary. I think it’s better to win the election and then charge him, the new (republican) president will be able to easily undo anything he has signed. If Hillary replaces him on the ticket, she will probably win, and nothing will be undone, she will march on under George Soros’ orders.

        • I don’t see how Miss Complicit would not be pulled into the scandal of this fraud. She KNEW, she KNOWS, she made a deal. The entire DemocRAT party is complicit, along with the media. There’s no way that any self-respecting Republican wouldn’t expose her for what she is. Bridgette’s video of the Clinton Chronicles should be required viewing. There’s no way she’s innocent. She would be a Soros puppet, just like Barry. She already is.

          • there is no way a demoRat would win if barky goes down.

          • The media will cover for her – vince foster, whitewater, rose law firm ??? and Obama will be a victim of the racist republicans who will do anything for power and to take down the black guy. Media will go along.
            Newt is the only thing they haven’t counted on. He can articulate in stark contrast and with specific facts conservative and liberal principles on every single issue, large or small. I really believe he is a curveball they will not be able to deal with.I think he is the only one Hillary could not beat.

    • Bridgett, whose Mr. Bauer? Unbelieveable the name. You do know where that name ……Renee…..should know……..that name originates with the original Rothschild name. Yikes….Mr. Big Guns?

      • Robert Bauer and Anita Dunn (loves Mother Theresa and Chairman Mao) are married. Dunn’s background is blacked out, much like Obama’s. He was the one who wrote all the pleadings to the original lawsuits protecting Obama. He became WH Counsel/personal attorney to Obama replacing another guy. I just forgot his name, (Greg Craig) but they were supposedly upset with him because Gitmo hadn’t been closed and he hadn’t vetted people properly. All subterfuge as no one was getting vetted and Congress refused to give the money for Gitmo to be closed, and Congress wouldn’t allow those prisoners to reside in the US).

        Bauer recently left to return to Chicago and his replacement was Kathryn Ruemmler.

      • Perkins Coie Alf. Funny you ask, he is just now over at Disneyland.

    • Maybe that’s when they bunker bust in Iran. Wag, wag, wag the Wagyu dog.

  8. Bauer was his personal attorney also and his legal edvisor since Obama has been in Washington DC. since 2005, Hmmm. And when He left Obama said he would continue to be a personal advisor. Oh yeah, with Perkins /Cole. Thanks

  9. Great Post Bridgette, hopefully his goose is not only cooked but deep fried!

  10. Cute Headlines from Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012:

    Georgia Battles:

    Round 2: Taitz 2, Obama 0

    Obama moves to dismiss all cases: DENIED

    Obama tries to quash subpoenas: DENIED

    On to Atlanta – January 26!

  11. I’m so sad. Have any of you seen my Lame Cherry? I awoke one day and she was gone. I am not smart enough to understand her parting words.
    I have come to you because I know you gals are like bloodhounds.

    Thanks, and I love your show. I have been lurking here for some time.

    Oh yeah, Go Orly!

    • I don’t know where or what has happened to Lame Cherry either. Like you, I don’t get the poems that were left suggesting an ending. I thought I read elsewhere that there was a death in the family, but I have no idea. Those poems and the white flower suggest death to me, but does it mean her death or someone she cared for?

      Don’t just lurk Ray, feel free to add comments.

      • Thanks for the reply Bridgette. My guess was that Lame Cherry’s mom may have died. I know she worshiped her mother to no end. I am so stuck on her, can’t tell you how much. I hope she comes back. Funny, for some time I could not tell if she was a guy or a gal.

        I hung out over at Michelle Malkin’s for a long time, but got tired of all of the personal attacks, not on me, I guess cuz I didn’t comment a lot. But I always check in over here to see what is going on.

        I guess another reason I got tired over at MM’s is that most everyone there gave up on the eligibility issue. MM sold out to the main stream, so she doesn’t comment on the issue. I was stuck on Mark Levin, but he sold out too. I had to listen to him on the QT, because my wife couldn’t stand his screeching.

        I love the detail that you all go into over here.

        I am on pins and needles. My bday is the 28th. I may decide to go to Atlanta on the 26th just because I know something good has to come from there.

        • greetings, Ray. a drop of golden sun.

          yes, I think that LC lost ‘his’ Mom. I can feel it in my bones.

          ~~ Saluting Lame Cherry.

    • I miss Cherry too. What is shown I think is the Lilly….Cherry always leaves the odd clues about. Welcome Ray.

      • Hey Renee, I just love surrounding myself with great women. One of my other favorites is Ann Barnhardt. I am still missing Texas Darlin and Butterdizillion. My wife is a brilliant internationatal attorney, but I have had to go the eligibility issue alone. I am also in the Leo Donofrio Fan Club.

        God Bless Orly Taitz. I have been in here corner since this mess started.

        • Hey, Ray! Well, stick around here and you’ll continue to be surrounded by great women, if we do say so ourselves. 😉

          • Greetings Papoose and Miri, and All,

            Do you think LC is a dude?
            “My Mom used to refer to me as Mr. Perfect, quite a title for a girl like me, but one of a dig as I used to infuriate her with being right. … Lame Cherry”

            Anyway, my guy hero just dropped a 54 page Amicus brief on Judge Malihi. I am still reading through it, but it is brilliant.

          • Lame cherry is definitely a guy. You mentioned he may have a sick family member, but when I read the poems it sounds like the “lady” in the poems is his country. just conjecture.

            • Originally thought LC was a guy. Then many of the posts seemed obviously written by a woman. Now, who knows? I always had trouble grokking half of what LC was trying to say, anyway.

          • From Ray’s comment referring to Leo’s brief that he filed.
            AMICUS BRIEF – Georgia POTUS Eligibility Cases.

            [UPDATED: 1:23 PM – SCRIBD download for Amicus Brief.]

            This morning, I filed an AMICUS BRIEF in the Georgia POTUS eligibility cases. The brief complies with all Rules and procedures of the Administrative Court. The brief is 54 pages, and the appendix is 155 pages. The Rules of Court require attachment to the brief of all legal authorities, other than those issued by the federal government, or the State of Georgia. There’s some very esoteric law attached thereto.

            I seriously urge everyone to familiarize themselves with Lord Coke’s Report from Calvin’s Case, as well as Chancellor Ellesmere’s argument, also in Calvin’s Case, for this is the true common law genesis of jus soli subjection, which happens to be a uniquely Christian tenet of law that has been completely misunderstood in this country for too long now. Calvin’s Case is universally recognized as the common law precedent relating to jus soli, but it is so much more fascinating than you can imagine. And it will forever revolutionize understanding of the words “natural-born”.

            This book contains all of the relevant arguments and reports. But the original text of Lord Coke’s Report is the proper starting point. (This document is also in the appendix to my brief.) And here’s another source with slightly modernized English and extras.

            You may download the AMICUS BRIEF here.

            Click to access georgia-brief-merged-final-redacted.pdf

          • Lord Coke is the bomb, legally speaking

  12. Huckabee on O’Reilly: Did Obama Get ‘Foreign Student’ Loans in College?
    Friday, January, 20, 2012 Kristinn

    Appearing on the Fox News Channel’s top-rated O’Reilly Factor this evening, former Arkansas Governer Mike Huckabee (R) suggested that President Barack Obama be challenged to prove whether he was treated as a “foreign student” in college.

    Huckabee made the remark in the context of a discussion with host Bill O’Reilly on Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, dithering over releasing his tax returns.

    Huckabee, who ran for president in 2008, urged Romney to say that he would release his tax returns when Obama released his college transcripts–and his college admissions records to show whether Obama received loans as a “foreign student.”

    While some will accuse Huckabee of going ‘birther’, others will understand that Huckabee is referring to Obama being adopted and raised for a time in Indonesia by his mother’s second husband, Lolo Soetoro, and whether Obama went to college as an Indonesian citizen to get advantageous treatment.

    Expect the leftist media to have a conniption fit over this.

    The issue of Obama refusing to release his college records was revisted this week by Fox’s White House reporter Ed Henry who asked Obama spokesman Jay Carney about it at a daily briefing. Carney brushed off the question. Henry did not ask whether Obama went to college as a foreign student.

    If it turns out Obama did go to college as a foreign student, it would lend credence to the argument that he does not meet the Constitutional mandate for natural born citizenship to be president.

    • Huckabee on O’Reilly: Did Obama Get Foreign Student Loans in College?

    • Huckabee on O’Reilly: Did Obama Get ‘Foreign Student’ Loans in College?

      duhhh….uh, maybe ? I cannot recall….

    • Perhaps the FOX media is making a switch and will soon be talking about Obama’s real lack of documents, not the BC, but other documents.. I heard on The Five, they were discussing Mitt’s tax return, and how the left will accuse him of hiding something because he hasn’t released them. Then someone said, what about Obama’s records, there is so much we don’t know about Obama. Another person said Mitt should ask for his college records. So they were sort of branding around the issue.

      Yet we have to look at earlier in the week, one of the WH Press corps asking Carney about his college records, then Huckabee, and now The Five. I think they said something a couple days ago on Red Eye too. So these are all Fox bites.

      Wasn’t it two weeks ago that one of Mitt’s sons also said the same thing when he was asked when his dad would release his tax returns. He then apologized, but it was out there.

      • Maybe by now Oxy, Columbia, and Harvard have rigged up some impressive records for him. Or Brennan has.

        • Absolutely, he will appear “brilliant.” I bet he matches Einstein in intelligence. They can take one of their Harvard crony’s real records and just add Obama’s name and address. That would be different.

      • Nah, I expect ther ratings have fallen a little and they know what sells, so they’re finally giving it the old college try. They don’t won’t to miss out if something good comes their way. That’s all it is Ive decided,with Fox.

  13. Judge whacks Obama in eligibility case
    ‘Defendant has failed to enlighten the court with legal authority’

    Jan. 20, 2012 Snips
    “Make no mistake about it. This is the beginning of Watergate Two or ObamaForgeryGate. I believe this is the second time in the U.S. history a sitting president is ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the president and a number of high-ranking individuals,” Taitz said. She told WND that it’s been 40 years since any court issued such a ruling concerning a president.

    Separately, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona told WND he also had gotten a subpoena to be at the hearings in Georgia. He said the goal apparently is to ask him about his Cold Case Posse investigation of Obama’s eligiblity, but he said since the investigation remains open, he wouldn’t be able to say much about it.
    Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Taitz; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield.

    Hatfield also had filed with the court a “Notice to Produce” asking for Obama’s documents and records. He wants one of the two original certified copies of Obama’s long-form birth certificate

  14. “Opposing Obama is not racist”
    Charge is meant to cover president’s failures and ostracize GOP candidate
    Jeffrey Kuhner January 19

    The Democrats are settling on one major election strategy: Portray opposition to President Obama as a form of racism. In a nutshell, the liberal argument is that conservative dissent from Mr. Obama’s social democratic agenda – Obamacare, the nearly $1 trillion stimulus and Dodd-Frank – is driven not by the color of the president’s politics, but the color of his skin.

  15. Congratulations everyone!

    This is also happening, in the background,


    Given the snaillike progress of the international oil sanctions campaign against Iran, the Israeli Prime Minister informed Gen. Dempsey Friday that he could not see his way to giving the Obama administration more time for these penalties to work. He stressed that the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program had reached the critical point where time was of the essence for preempting a nuclear-armed Iran.

    We need a real CIC, like yesterday

    • They said that some Democrats and Republicans say there are laws that say the president doesn’t have to appear in court and not to expect him to be there. This according to the You Tube news report. Democratic counsel had no comment on the news. The news anchor says the lawsuit is questioning his “citizenship” not NBC, and the second one does say NBC. They also say that the courts have already heard this case in the Federal Court on its “merits.” Not true. The WH has a new website up to report on all these challenges. I didn’t catch the name. Something catchy, no doubt, like Fight the Smears. Spending more money to protect the fraudulent BC rather than show the original so lawsuits don’t have to be fought in multiple states? To easy.

  16. From CW’s – jbjd left a comment and refers to an earlier comment at CW’s she wrote that I haven’t read.
    jbjd | January 21, 2012 at 2:47 pm

    I tried to correct these misinterpretations in yesterday’s thread. Here is a summary of those rather lengthy posts.

    In real life logic, the court’s decision not to grant Defendant Obama’s responsive Motion to Quash Plaintiff’s subpoena to appear; is not the same as Ordering Defendant to Appear, in compliance with Plaintiff’s requested subpoena.

    This obvious distinction was made especially clear in this case, where the judge specifically wrote, Defendant had merely failed to cite to any sound legal reason Plaintiff’s subpoena should not be allowed.

    Yes; a so-called news site posted this incorrect ‘news.’ Perhaps the writer actually read the court’s decision – a link to the court’s actual decision does not appear on that site – and merely misinterpreted that decision. Or, maybe, he was relying on Orly’s misinterpretation of that decision. Either way, the interpretation and, therefore, the news, is wrong.

  17. Did you see the updates in the article above? Don’t miss the new photo of the “geese.”

  18. I hope this goes beyond the BC although at this point i am fairly certain he does not have one.

  19. Puzo1 said…
    I of II

    Lucas Smith has posted an article at his blog,, entitled, “A question from Lucas Smith to attorney Mario Apuzzo: If Obama fails to appear for the administrative court hearing in Georgia, tentatively scheduled for January, 26 2012, what legal repercussions could he be confronted with?”

    Here is my response to Lucas Smith which I posted at his blog:


    Thank you for giving me the opportunity to address this issue on your very informative blog. Here is a quick answer.

    The subpoena issued to Obama comes from an administrative court rather than a law court. A court-issued subpoena has the authority of a court order whether it comes from a law court or an administrative one.

    Obama just happens to be the President now and would have to take time out of his official schedule to honor the subpoena. Nevertheless, Obama is subpoened as a private individual, not as the President.

    Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena and here is why.

    “It is beyond dispute that there is in fact, a public obligation to provide evidence, see United States v. Bryan, 339 U. S. 323, 339 U. S. 331; Blackmer v. United States, 284 U. S. 421, 284 U. S. 438, and that this obligation persists no matter how financially burdensome it may be. Footnote 10″
    “Footnote 10 [I]t may be a sacrifice of time and labor, and thus of ease, of profits, of livelihood. This contribution is not to be regarded as a gratuity, or a courtesy, or an ill-required favor. It is a duty not to be grudged or evaded. Whoever is impelled to evade or to resent it should retire from the society of organized and civilized communities, and become a hermit. He who will live by society must let society live by him, when it requires to. 8 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2192, p. 72 (J. McNaughton rev.1961).”
    Hurtado v. United States, 410 U.S. 578, 589 (1973). This is one case among the many on this issue.

    Indeed, Obama, as a member of legally constituted society, has a “public obligation” to provide evidence to a court, whether that court is a law court or an administrative one. His obligation is even greater given that the subpoena touches upon his right to eventually hold a public office should he win the election. Even Congress, which is not a law court, issues subpoenas which must be obeyed at the risk of suffering severe sanctions, including incarceration.

    The only way that Obama could avoid the subpoena is to show that somehow he has some privilege that protects him from giving the requested evidence. Again, Obama has been subpoened as a private person, a candidate for public office, not as the President of the United States. From the Georgia court’s ruling on Obama’s motion to quash, we can see that Obama failed to make such a showing that convinced the court that he in fact has such a privilege.

    Continued . . . .

    January 21, 2012 9:26 AM

    • Part II of II

      If Obama does not honor the subpoena, the court, applying Georgia law and precedents from federal law, can issue an order to show cause to him ordering him to show cause why he should not be held in contempt. If he still does not comply, then he would be held in contempt of court. The court in such a case will issue sanctions to him, which can include a monetary penalty, an adverse ruling against him in the case itself, or even incarceration. Since he is the currently putative sitting President, the court would probably just opt for an adverse ruling rather than jail. That would be the best option since it gets to the heart of the matter. That adverse ruling would be that Obama has not met his burden of proof to show that he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Hence, the court could recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State that Obama’s not be allowed to be placed on the primary ballot. In the end, the Secretary of State will make the ultimate decision.

      Additionally, the current sitting President of the United States not honoring a court-issued and properly served subpoena related to whether the President is constitutionally eligible for that very office could also be deemed a “high Crime[] or Misdemeanor[]” under Article II, Section 4, the article dealing with impeachment of the President. Congress could declare such conduct a high crime or misdemeanor and initiate and prosecute impeachment proceedings against Obama and they should.

      January 21, 2012 9:31 AM

  20. Linked from CNN via WCVB TV-Boston. Looks as if Newt’s got SC:

    This is getting interesting.

    • 40% for Newt!!!!!
      27% for Romney
      17 for Santorum
      13 Ron Paul

      That means Newt got Perry’s people and siphoned from Santorum and Ron Paul.

  21. Sorry, I meant to say her lawyers were not your typical family law type lawyers or divorce lawyers really.

  22. Her attorney according to divorce papers was George L.T. Kerr from Henshaw, COnroy & Hamilton. This memorial says he left the Navy (he was JAG in Pearl Harbor) in 1962 and then went to work for Henshaw Conroy.
    more about the firm

  23. Just remembered that Sheriff Joe’s report comes out the beginning of February. From what he has indicated, there is something of significance that he has found. It should verify/validate alot of what has been investigated here and elsewhere. I am pretty sure of the following:

    He never had a US passport and neither did SAD
    He was registered as a foriegn student in college.
    He only attended Columbia for a short time if at all. His Columbia degree was obtained another way

    The other thing that appears to be true is that he does not have a BC from Hawaii. It begs the question, where is it and where was he born? I dont know why they got hung up on Hawaii as the birthplace. I am pretty sure he was born in the US but not in Hawaii. What’s up?

    • Need to correct the first comment….

      I dont believe he has the US passport, she does. I meant that neither appear to have legit SSNs.

      • I remember that story but I remember also that it turned into Ann visiting Chicago with Stanley to check out colleges. Always goes back to Chicago doesn’t it?

      • Yeah, but also what about some sites that claim Madelyn Dunham had at least 4 different addresses in Chicago. Some of their research led back to the same people, like Kelly Shiplick, James Allen Dunham, ect. Patricia Anne Dunham.

        • Posted many times before;
          Here is what is on the SS Application:
          Full Name: Kelly Ann Green DOB 11-8-64 Present Age: 8 your sex Female your race White (choices were white, negro, other btw)
          Place of Birth: Kenmore Eire, New York. Mother’s full name at birth: Shirley L. Loughrey
          Fathers Full name: Robert R Green
          Mailing address 814 Pioneer North Tonawanda, NY 14120
          Todays date 2-3-73 and then her signature.

          Certification of Marriage
          Certificate No. 151 1997-011752
          Name of Groom
          James Timothy Dunham
          Date of Birth November 23, 1965 Place of Birth: Chicago, Illinois
          Usual residence: 956 Honokahua Pl County: Honolulu State or Country: Hawaii
          Fathers Name: John Edward Dunham State or Country of Birth: Illinois

          Mother’s maiden name Geraldine Ann O’neill State or country of birth: Michigan

          Name of Bride: Kelly Lynn Allen
          Date of Birth: October 1, 1968 Place of Birth: Redlands, California
          Usual Residence 956 Honokahua Pl, Honolulu, Hawaii
          Father’s name: Grandison Greer Allen State or country of Birth: USA-unknown
          Mother’s name Kay Joyce Dickerson State or country of Birth: USA-unknown
          Groom’s declared middle name: Timothy Brides declared middle name(s) Allen
          Grooms declared surname: Dunham Bride’s declared surname: Dunham
          Date of Marriage August 15, 1997 Place of ceremony: Waiokeola Congregational Church, Honolulu
          Date filed with local registrar August 19, 1997 Date copy was issued: June 30, 1999

          • hey, if ya’ll dont mind this ,I thought was interesting when I looked up Barry Stanley. I found many more really odd ones and in Hawaii,and one was Barry Stanley AKA Ann stanley-barry . forgot where that one was from….heres the one I thought was really strange.Notice the Alias names. I have one more after you look over this one…which relates to the Cynthia Tate I found at Madelyns apartment address one time with Marcus Tate and James Tate……Real interesting, but just on a hunch I decided to try the name Cynthia Stanley…Woa! Said too many names,too narrow down my search so I just chose middle initial D. in Illinois and what da ya know . It’s just too weird for it to be a coincidence that the Ayers name pops up. And notice the Freddie Mack last names too. I really think somethings going on here with these names. I’ll post a page of this after you’ve seen this post. This I did after Cnythia.
            Barry Valerie Stanley, age 71
            Get more details
            Name/Aliases Has lived in DOB Phone Address Related to
            Barry Valerie Stanley
            Tbarrett Stanley
            Thomas Bell Stanley
            Thomas Barrett Stanley
            View All Sag Harbor, NY
            Brooklyn, NY
            Piermont, NY Marilynn T Stanley
            Erica L Stanley
            Denise Stanley
            Candace J Stanley
            Alison Lee Stanley

          • there were so many interesting connections to Cynthia Payne, Dunham, Stanley. I didn’t post them but it goes into oblivian the possibilities that there’s a scam of some sort.

          • and Barry r. Stanley and Cynthia Stanley are relatives in Chicago too.

          • hate to put you guys thru this but Renee, decided to go ahead and look up Michelle Stanley while I was at it. Notice the first one Renee, There’s your Bunny you’re so fond of. And of course there’s Jordans now.

          • then of course the second page of Michelles, there’s your Carrs and Bakers . Are these all their contacts in Ill? just wondering. Anyway I want bother you guys with more but these alway get me when the first try I get names like these.

          • Alfy, try the Stanley horse stables across the pond and the Arab that now owns them.

          • Arab horse stables, where do I click across the pond?

  24. Click to access png.pdf

    would this look familiar to anybody….this is lawyer Conroy….hmmm microfinance, banks

    • I believe the Conroy name associated with the law firm was Hal, not John D.

      • Madelyn Dunham supposedly did not become president of Bank of Hawaii till 1970,so her ties with this law firm shoud not have been so significant. Just brings up more questions .

      • Bridg, I think you are right, my bad, but hey,could be related, John certainly is doing a dang good job for Rockefeller thought isn’t he? Papua new g.

        • [PDF]
          Summary John D. Conroy – Asian Development Bank

          … the central bank to encourage the development of a more sustainable microfinance sector through low-key. “promotional” activities. Summary. John D. Conroy …

        • I doubt they are related. John is from Australia.

          • thanks bridgette, still a Rockefeller pal, I believe. I am pretty sure he also has a practice in NY. Thanks but who was aking me to check the timeline. Timeline for what more specifically? Good morning to everyone ,by the way. Third cup of coffee scuze me if the letters get jumbled.

          • Or I should say thankyou Renee and Bridg. Been reading lots already this morning on the retiring clerk of court of Hawaii. Didn’t find the date of his retirement,but he was there since at least 1966 and possibly as deputy clerk before that so Mr. Chinn was interesting and sounded very nice, just wish he hadn’t said his passion was on the golf course…hum.
            Just readin away this morning. I think somebody better swipe some DNA somehow off Obama next chance they get cause he or we might need it.

  25. I’d say they weren’t your typical divorce lawyers were they?

  26. I mean vice president, Sorry.

  27. Is Obama Guilty of Identity Fraud Rather than Ineligibility?

    Jan. 22, 2012

    But is identity fraud, rather than ineligibility, the actual crime?

    What will be the consequences if Obama does not appear? Atty. Mario Apuzzo responded to the question:….

    Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena and here is why….

    Indeed, Obama, as a member of legally constituted society, as a “public obligation” to provide evidence to a court, whether that court is a law court or an administrative one. His obligation is even greater given that the subpoena touches upon his right to eventually hold a public office should he win the election. Even Congress, which is not a law court, issues subpoenas which must be obeyed at the risk of suffering severe sanctions, including incarceration.

  28. yes and in the case of ones identity or citizenship ,such as in having the right to vote in this country , the burden of proof is on the citizen. The court is not trying to prove he’s neither of these but is nuetral in giving him every possible opportunity to show otherwise to the charges brought. It is in the courts interest and a citizens interest to be present for further questioning or proof.

  29. I suspect that Obama will not appear as ordered.

    And the Judge will then find Obama in contempt of Court.

    To which Obama will essentially say,

    “So? What are you going to do about it?”

    This wouldn’t be the first time that this administration was found in contempt of court…

    Remember February 2011?

    Obama Administration Found in Contempt of Court

    On Thursday, Louisiana Federal District Court Judge Martin Feldman found that the Obama Interior Department was in contempt of his ruling that the offshore oil drilling moratorium, imposed by the administration in 2010, was unconstitutional. After Feldman struck down the initial drilling ban, the Interior Department simply established a second ban that was virtually identical.

    • Yes. He already ignores the law, the Constitution, and our duly elected representatives, as well as rulings from the court. Why would he care what an administrative judge in one of the 58 states says? He wasn’t actually ordered to appear by the judge; his apparently incompetent or arrogant lawyer was prodded to cite a law that allows potus to refuse to comply with subpoenas. Barry can always, if there’s an important campaign stop or golf game to attend, or a song to be sung, authorize his personal attorney to deliver the records that Orly has subpoenaed. Would any lawyer worth his or her salt have the gall to present such “authentic” documents?

  30. Morning Redpill ! Missed you. This brings up a question I have for you or anyone else also. If papers are served on one name, but the person really is another person, how does that work legally ?

    • Thanks, Renee!

      I’ve been offline for three days (for good reasons… very quality time with my wife), so this is the first chance I’ve had to respond to this news.

      I’m not an attorney, and I don’t know the legal answer to your question, but I would suspect that if a person is generally known by an alias, and they are summoned by the Court with that alias, then the Court expects them to show up. Obama doesn’t really have the luxury of saying, “I don’t have to come because I’m not really Barack Obama”!

      If the “Obama birth narrative” is true, then he is not eligible for the Presidency because of his and his father’s British subjecthood.

      And if the “Obama birth narrative” is not true, then he is guilty of fraud, forgery, perjury, etc., and even if he were born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen parents, he would still be guilty of high crimes and could be removed from office.

      • I hope you had a great time with your wife. You deserve it.

      • “Quality time.” We have the picture, but shouldn’t … 😉

        • She likes to travel. I make her happy, and yes, she makes me happy. 😉

          This past weekend’s trip was a bit cold outside, so we had to snuggle up when we came inside. 🙂

          And then, in a week and a half, we’re going on a cruise (first time for both of us)!

          • Oh, great for you, but please make sure the captain doesn’t try to do any “sail by” near rocky islands. Have a wonderful time!

            • I suspect that this is probably the safest time to take a cruise… the crew will be on their best behavior, and the passengers will be attentive during the safety training and evacuation drill.

              From what I understand, the Costa Concordia fiasco was the result of the captain being where he shouldn’t have been, doing what he shouldn’t have been doing, to show off for friends and impress the woman with whom he was having dinner and feeding his “appetites”. And then the p.o.s. abandoned ship while passengers were left on board to die.

              /soapbox off

              I have no doubt that our captain will be professional. And thank you very much for the well wishes!

      • Right on Red Pill, either way, he’s going to be pulling something out of his— to carry this off . If not forgery, purgury,fraudulent doc. …something.At least a little ‘impeachment lite” comes to mind.

    • It is the name he purports is his legal name but in addition his attorneys responded for him by filing motions, so he has entered himself into the litigation under the name Barack Obama

      • I honestly have no idea what will happen with this case, but for sure it comes at such a time that I can’t help but wonder if something about it is on purpose to get this done and over with come his election forays. I know you’ve all felt it, haven’t you?

  31. Love the picture on this post! Damn right its what the people want to see,the line is long. “Throw Them All Out” “God Bless America!” communism does not work in America. The Unconstitutional illegal alien muslim/communist treasonous fraud must go NOW!

  32. Like I said before, I can feel somethig coming and I notice all the new arrivals on your site you guys, everyone is so enthusiastic that something will come of this. Let’s you know you’re not alone in all your efforts,cuz for sure it blogs like this that have given an avenue of hope that justice will be done. Nice to see other people that don’t blog on here all the time who , I’m sure have been watching , researching and listening. Thousands are waiting for the big CreshendO;, but will this be just a little stocking stuffer with coal at the heel? Or could some major something come up that only a President can solve; even lame ones, “sorry your Honor, I’m off to save the world from Iran. You know I do have a world to look after.” As if I haven’t already done enough!”

    Read this for the connections between the Dunham females, banking and connection to the globalists AND Bishop’s trust

    • Charlotte, very interesting. Have you seen this post on the research blog?

      Akhtar Hameed Khan and S. Ann Dunham

      An interesting article has come to light that connects Dr. Akhtar Hameed Khan with S. Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro, the anthropologist cum microcredit whiz kid and “mother” of a president.

      World renowned social scientist Dr. Akhtar Hameed Khan (nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize) was a pioneer of rural development, poverty alleviation and microcredit (extension of small loans to the poor). His ground-breaking methods have been applied around the world by everyone from Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus to U.S. President Barack Obama’s mother, Dr. Stanley Ann Dunham (who had a career in rural development and later promoted microcredit in Indonesia). …

      Dr. Khan’s second monumental project was the now world-famous Orangi Pilot Project (OPP), which he established in Karachi (Pakistan) in 1980. The project was setup in Orangi Town, a low income settlement of over one million people, and its goal was to provide low cost sanitation, housing, health, education and small loans (microcredit) to the impoverished of the region. The project was again highly successful and received worldwide acclaim. …

    • Thanks Charlotte for posting that. First time someone has put the connections together that well. This stuff has been swirling around in my research since 2007. I could go into the oddest disconnects with research and microfinance for the poor would stand out over and over, and the Bishop Estate, Hawaii banking ,Trusts,lawyers. Looking for Sotoro even in the Philipines,the first person turns up for me,that Bush and Clinton tout as a economic genious is the microfinace master Hernando Soto hoping to work his magic on the Philipines and all the rest of the poor countries left . Its the first time I see the most important relevance as to why this must be done on a global scale however. The very poor are not tied into the system of legal ownership of property. Hernando wants to correct that. The untapped billions that can be made from the poor,who don’t have a social sec. number or any legal papers to show ownership of anything, but once they do,they are forever indebted to the system. I am trying to say this in the simplest terms. Microfinance is the most dispicable thing I have seen. The 20th century elitist dream to rape and pillage the rest of the untapped spoils of the rightful owners of their life and land.

    • Nobel Laureate Yunus’ famed Grameen Bank microcredit bank takes 30 percent interest and leads many poor women into a debt spiral.

      Published 11.30.2010 06:00.

      Burn-point documentary “Caught in micro debt” shows a completely
      different page than the microcredit Muhammad Yunus and his Nobel Peace Prize winning Grameen Bank Bank likes to portray to the public.

      Debt Spiral

      Investigations of the Danish journalist Tom Heinemann has made for NRK Brennpunkt several trips to Bangladesh and talks with a number of international experts the world over, shows that the Grameen Bank leads many poor women in a devastating debt spiral.

      above starts here @ wtpotus research blog –

  34. Should be a good day today. DH has indicated to me that they are supposed to hear from the state of Hawaii regarding the Sunahara motion that he filed for access to Virginia’s BC. Hopefully he will release the response they receive from the state in a timely manner. Of course, if they don’t respond by today, they win by default…..

  35. Obama Uses Same Lines from 2010, 2011 in State of the Union
    Posted on January 25, 2012 by Jay

    The Republican National Committee has compiled this video comparing lines President Obama used tonight in his State of the Union Address with lines he used in previous addresses before Congress:

    • Same ole, same ole crap. Did you listen to the blowhard in chief last night? For 65 minutes, he was baiting people with his words, wanting to create a few more agencies, wants bills for immigration put on his desk and he will sign them now! Bring me the bill! Nothing about the 40 jobs bills sitting on Harry’s desk! Then he talks about how divided and broken everything is. Oh yes, another executive order is coming out this week, and he even said he will get things done with or without Congress. The rats couldn’t sit in their chairs. Climate change was another favorite …you remember the scams… and Solyndra. Energy projects..he is on it! .By the way, he approved a $100 billion high speed rail line! That is our infrastructure monies. I hate listening to him give a speech like he is the wisest person alive. He is so condescendingly arrogant. You’ve seen people smash their TV, ohhh I was so close.

      After BHO, the Republican Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels spoke. What a difference in tone, and message! It was refreshing after listening to BHO. He did a great job.

      One of the senators or reps said Obama hasn’t done anything since Labor Day! John Boehner hasn’t talked to him in a month.

      • 2012 Republican Response from Gov. Mitch Daniels (R-IN) (C-SPAN)

      • I couldn’t watch. I knew what he’d say, anyway. I refuse to spend one more moment being condescended to by a twerp. He’s such a little man, in so many ways. Hubby couldn’t believe that he was still bloviating as hubby was switching channels long past the time Barry SHOULD HAVE STFU. But Barry does so like the sound of his own voice.

        I saw an article somewhere (Gateway Pundit?) yesterday that said Andrea Mitchell reported that if Romney loses Florida, the powers-that-be in the RINO party already are planning a coup to put up (from the smoke-filled backroom) anybody but Newt. Here we go again, folks. It’s a joke. Lip service to the people to make them believe they choose their own candidates. Mitch Daniels is one of the names she floated.

        Then there’s San Fran Nana’s quip about something she “knows” that means Newt will never be POTUS. I guess she’s talking about that ethics file that will just happen to “leak” like Ryan’s and Hull’s divorce records or Linda Tripp’s personnel file. But maybe she’s talking about inside knowledge of those smoke-filled RINO backrooms.

        I always thought that the fix was in in 2008. The powers chose McCain and he was chosen to lose to that one. The powers early on chose Romney this time around. The DemocRATS are prepared to run against Romney but not against anyone else. They don’t want Newt as the nominee because Barry could NEVER be trained well enough to stand up against the withering scrutiny that Newt would give his record or the grilling that he’d get in debates by Newt.

        I’m sure they’ll dig out that crap (already are!) about Daniels. Same reporter I spoke about before, who excused Barry’s speechwriters plagiarizing other Obama speechwriters from 2010, mentioned this morning that Daniels had an “open marriage”, too. That is such a mischaracterization that the guy should be ashamed of himself. Daniels’s wife left him alone with their kids, for him to raise for several years. She came back, he forgave her, and she begged him not to let their marriage now be put through the horrid media circus that they knew would come from this corrupt media if he ran for POTUS.

        This would be the same media that IGNORES Larry Sinclair, Vera Baker, and MO’s squeeze, not to mention most of Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades, John Edwards’s love child, and Huma Weiner and Hillary, but focuses like a laser on Republicans’ families.

        To try to smear Daniels for something that is actually honorable by using a phrase like “open marriage” and equating his situation to Newt Gingrich’s is BEYOND DISHONEST.

        But they don’t care. They put out the sound bite, hope that’s all people hear, hope people believe and do no more investigation, and hope that all the lies of ommission ruin Daniels in the minds of voters forever.

        I cannot express how much I hate those dishonest so-called “journalists”. I vomit them out of my mouth.

        • If you hear screaming, it’s me reacting to the audio clips they’re playing ad nauseum on the radio of Mr. Juvenile Petulance himself. Gag me with TOTUS. Please. You’d be doing me a favor. I truly am nauseated. Barry is so nauseous.

          • I hear you, I hear you….no more, no more! screaming! Put him on mute. Last night, I was cooking so he was on in the background. I changed the channel..and he was on that one too! No need to hear it all as the sound bites will be on all day.

            • This morning, trying to drown him out on the radio news, I did a pretty good impersonation of Barry, except all I imitated was his inflection, phrasing, tone of voice. I was saying, “Blah, blah. … Blah, blah, … blah. Blah, blah, blah, blah.” And sounding as arrogant and condescending as possible. I’ll bet it made about as much sense as what he did say.

              Last night, hubby asked, “WHAT? Is he on EVERY channel?” Then he found a hockey game. TG because I would have left the room if he settled on Barry.

              btw, I told him about Kerry’s supposed black eyes from hockey. He said, “No way. Looks like an eye job.”

              Why didn’t I think of that? Bet he was getting rid of those hang-dog bags, but is too vain to admit it. Could it be that he’s the planned replacement for Bite Me?

        • I read some rumblings about Daniels running too. In fact, I think the anchors talked about it last night. He was the budget director in for GW. I guess he has already turned Indiana around and is really well liked in his state.

          Also, I got a call yesterday asking if I would support Jim DeMint if he would run for president. So there is a new PAC that is supporting him. I don’t know the final deadline, but it seems like it is getting late to get into the race, raise money and put operations together in all the states.

    • I heard some reporter on the radio this morning excusing this away. Journolist talking points went out, no doubt. He said something like, “why mess with success?”

Leave a Reply to Bridgette Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s