Week Two of the High Tech Lynching of Cain: The Left Doubles Down (Open Thread)

© Miri WTPOTUS November 07, 2011

The progressive left is outraged that their high-tech lynching of Herman Cain has not yet accomplished its goal.  This morning, I heard a radio talk show host say that the Cain story is falling like “a lead balloon.”  Not so fast, Jamie Allman! Never count out enraged progressives.  They’re doubling down.

Today, we will be treated to a new accusation by a new accuser (let’s hope this one is IDENTIFIED).  This accuser will be represented at a press conference by none other than “celebrity attorney” Gloria Allred.

Calling out the big dogs now.  And these dogs will worry that bone until it breaks.  Doubling down.

Gloria Allred has been described as a “feminist crusader”.  Allred also interjected herself into the Anthony Weiner affair.   Some say her goal is simply to make money. But fellow blogger, jbjd, has written extensively about Allred’s shenanigans on behalf of the progressive left; e.g., in this story about the help that Allred gave to Jerry Brown in his campaign against Meg Whitman in CA.  Be sure to read in the same story about the role that Allred  played during the 2008 DNC Services Corporation Presidential Nominating Convention, which ended with Hillary Clinton being thrown under the bus in favor of the selected one, Barack Obama, an outcome that jbjd described as “a coup.” 

Although NBC says they have not “confirmed the [new] allegations,” that didn’t stop them from splashing the promised smear all over the front page of their website

In the same vein, it’s reported that Politico, last week, ran 94 stories (as of the time of the report) about these ANONYMOUS, NONSPECIFIC allegations against Cain.  How many stories has Politico run about the very SPECIFIC allegations that Mr. Larry Sinclair made against Barack Obama during the campaign of 2008?  Allegations of cocaine use and gay sex.  I don’t recall that story percolating to the top of the lamestream media mudpot.

Last week, we were subject to the irony of lamestream media personalities excoriating Herman Cain for allegedly offending anonymous women via sexual innuendo, when these same “journalists” fiercely defended Bill Clinton, who was publicly accused by Ms. Paula Jones, to whom Clinton eventually (and publicly) paid an enormous settlement for very clear and specific allegations of sexual harassment. The same Bill Clinton who had a sexual relationship in the Oval Office with an intern over thirty years his junior, which led to his impeachment, during which the lamestream media fervently defended him.

In their anger that their orchestrated ploy to bring down Cain’s candidacy didn’t work, the lamestream lashed out in anger, in an angry red tantrum of blatant racism against the black conservative.  The newest charge against Cain? He’s starring in a “minstrel show.”   Or he’s a minstrel because he’s also a gospel singer:

Painting Cain as the latest high-profile victim of white liberals who abhor black conservatives won’t lessen the significance of the sexual-harassment charges. Nor will his breaking into song Tuesday at a National Press Club news conference — which seemed more minstrel than presidential — make the charges go away.

So they’re resurrecting a RACIST meme that began when Cain first came onto the scene.  But they do so cleverly. They either have a black “contributor” make the charge, as in the two examples above, or, if the writer is white, he or she simply “reports” (dredges up) old charges of “minstrelsy” originally made by a black person.  One “sometime respectable Negro” dredged up his own old charge of minstrelsy against Cain. Here’s another from a “black bourgeoisie perspective.”  Somehow, I doubt these persons are truly bourgeoisie.  If so, they’d be supporting the proud, successful, capitalist Cain, who poses an existential threat to the progressive left, who believe that all blacks should forever vote in lockstep with and for them.

The press conference will be held shortly.  Stay tuned.

Open thread.

223 responses to “Week Two of the High Tech Lynching of Cain: The Left Doubles Down (Open Thread)

  1. https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/11/01/high-tech-lynching-of-herman-cain-open-thread/comment-page-2/#comment-66046

    Please read that very important comment by Bridgette that documents how Holdren, Barry’s “science czar”, has been ILLEGALLY giving away technology to the RED Chinese. Here’s one link from the WSJ: http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.rss.html?pid=35130

    Maybe Allred’s news conference is running interference for Barry. A distraction from this outrageous violation of the law AND from tomorrow’s spectacle when Holder is SUPPOSED to testify about Fast and Furious.

    • I believe you are so right..a total distraction from the upcoming events and real news that should be reported! A woman from Cain’s past alleging information that can’t be verified will make the headlines rather than Holder’s “testimony” of lies, Holder’s refusal to investigate important issues such as treason by Holdren, approval of the TransCanadian oil pipeline that would provide over 50,000 jobs being delayed by Obama until after the election, and more evidence of solar scandals and the Department of Energy’s corruption. This is so predictable and abominable..it makes me ill.

  2. Lawyer: 4th Cain accuser will speak publicly Monday
    Nov. 7, 2011 Snips

    Celebrity lawyer Gloria Allred will appear before reporters this afternoon in New York City with a woman who will allege that GOP presidential contender Herman Cain sexually harassed her, Allred’s office said Monday.

    The woman is not one of the three women previously reported to have accused Cain of sexual harassment, Allred’s office said.

    Allred’s client will allege that Cain harassed her when she sought his help seeking a job while he was president of the National Restaurant Association, the law office said in an e-mail. She will be the first person to give her name and provide details in a scandal that has consumed Cain’s presidential campaign for more than a week.

    Allred’s office said she will appear with her client at 1:30 p.m. at the Friars Club in Manhattan.


    • High Profile DEMONRAT Gloria…isn’t she getting to be like Jesse Jackson or Sharpton..always wanting to be in the middle of something? Gloria helped derail Meg Whitman in CA, and now she is called upon to do the same to Herman. So far the headlines have been from anonymous sources with no concrete information, so now Gloria “finds” another woman to say there are allegations. I wonder how many years ago this happened. The democrats and their subservient media are doing their normal hit job. “Creating” a story out of a non-story is getting to be the norm.

    • Another Woman Accuses Cain of Sexual Advance
      Nov. 7 – 4 minutes ago

      A fourth woman stepped forward Monday to accuse Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment. Sharon Bialek, a former employee at the National Restaurant Association Education Foundation, became the first woman to publicly detail her accusations against Mr. Cain. She spoke at a press conference in Manhattan arranged by her lawyer, Gloria Allred, a prominent discrimination attorney.

      Ms. Bialek alleged that Mr. Cain, then the head of the National Restaurant Association, which ran the foundation, had inappropriately touched her when she had gone to him for help finding a new job in 1997, shortly after she was laid off from the organization. She said she came to Washington at her boyfriend’s suggestion, seeking Mr. Cain’s help to get a new job.

      Ms. Bialek said the two dined at an Italian restaurant, and afterwards, in his car, Mr. Cain put his hand up her skirt and pushed her head toward his genitals. She said that when she protested that she had a boyfriend, Mr. Cain asked her whether she wanted a job.

      She did not file charges or notify the National Restaurant Association, though Ms. Allred presented two signed statements from people Ms. Bialek said she had told at the time.


      • I’d keep my head down too, Sharon… No police record, July, 1997 – 14 years ago, no notification to the Restaurant Association! Just two people saying they remember Sharon telling them about it! Wouldn’t you know it would be a white Republican woman to add to the scandal.

        Photo from WSJ:

      • Herman Cain, Gloria Allred, Sharon Bialek
        Nov. 7 Snips

        I watched the press conference with Gloria Allred and Sharon Bialek and found the pre-statement part quite strange. I find it very difficult to take anything Glorial Allred says seriously, she is nothing more than an ambulance chaser, publicity hound, and Democrat partisan. As to Sharon Bialek and whether her statement is true or not, I can’t say.

        I can say she acted like a silly teenager while standing behind Allred, giggling, laughing, smiling. This is still a he-said, she-said. Bialek claims at the time of the incident she told her boyfriend and another male friend about the incident, but not the details of the incident, which makes any documents they sign simply heresay I would suspect.


      • Isn’t it interesting how the complaint parallels Paula Jones’s complaint and how her allegation suddenly contains ALL the elements that were missing from the anonymous allegations previously reported last week? Quid pro quo for a job. Touching. Asking for a BJ. Being a total pig, in other words, like Bill Clinton.

        Oh, I’m sure that Allred has some signed statements. Were these people under oath? I hope they have good lawyers because no doubt Cain can sue for defamation of character. Were these contemporaneously done or are we to rely on their memories? She didn’t file any charges, though. Of course not. Then there would be EVIDENCE. People are saying Bialek is a Republican, so Allred has covered that base, too. So believable. She didn’t even notify the Restaurant Association? Why not? But she’s not going to sell her story. Bialek’s from Chicago, did you know? How freaking racist are they?

        When did Sharon register to be a Republican? She graduated from high school in 1979. Keep in mind that she’s the typical disgruntled employee, having been let go and she didn’t understand why she was let go. She felt it was unfair that she was “let go.”

        • Allred’s sleazy remark about Cain providing her with a “stimulus package” tells you how serious she feels this issue is. Is that how a serious feminist would speak? Making jokes? She’s not selling the story for some real reason, you can be sure. Are we supposed to believe that her doctor boyfriend is more believable?

          • Gloria puts forth a new standard: She’s “disgusted” if a candidate is “lying to Americans” and “showing disdain for our common sense and intellect.” Hmmm. Now who does that describe? It is time to hold politicians to a higher standard. That’s why BARRY needs to come clean about Larry Sinclair’s allegations.

            She says we “need to know the truth” about people running for office and that we can’t afford to elect “ONCE AGAIN” someone who will “ignore the law.” Uh, are you talking about Barry there, Gloria?

      • Waving the affidavits in the air..but they won’t be given to the press…reminds us of waving Obama’s BC in front of the press!

        • Oh, yes. Gloria says they’re “declaration under penalty of perjury.” Right. But we don’t know what these guys are swearing to. Do we?

          If Sharon Bialek cares so much about women, the truth, and making sure he doesn’t get away with it, what took her SO LONG to come forward and why did she come forward NOW?

          Notice how she covers the bases in case somebody remembers that her boyfriend was present at that one event? In case anybody asks HIM about Cain? Sharon says Cain was warm and wonderful THEN, when her boyfriend was present.

          If it’s true that there was a hotel suite that was upgraded by Cain, then that should be on the record at the hotel.

          Why does the accuser read her statement instead of just telling the story in her own words? Why does she read it like a 3rd grader, telling a story? She does smile at inappropriate places, sort of like Monica Lewinsky, as if she enjoyed the suite and the attention. One begins to wonder who was making moves on whom.

          She remembers exactly what she was wearing? Give me a break. And what Herman was wearing. Right. I remember what I wore to conferences and meetings I attended that many years ago. Don’t you?

          When he grabbed under her skirt and he pushed her head towards his crotch she said,

          “What are you doing? YOU KNOW I HAVE A BOYFRIEND.”

          Now that’s what I would say. Totally. Wouldn’t you? You know I have a boyfriend? Let’s get real.

          The sing-song way she tells this tale is very, shall we say, telling. She may think she’ll never have to tell it in court, under oath, but I wouldn’t be so sure.

          Notice how she remembers the conversation, verbatim, so many years later, too. “I’ll look into that, “Herman told her, when she said she wanted a job.

          I can’t even repeat to you conversations I had YESTERDAY. 🙂

          When she gets to the quid pro quo part, watch carefully how she looks up and almost winks. To make sure they get that part. It was a quid pro quo! The very definition of sexual harassment! I cannot wait until O’Reilly’s body language “expert” analyzes this one. She’s a lib, so no telling what she’ll read into it. But he has been the victim of a smear EXACTLY like this one. Remember? I can guess how O’Reilly will cover this, if he covers it at all.

          This is really so disgusting. It’s beyond words. It was said that Gingrich, by debating Cain recently, gave Cain more “cred”. So there you go. More reason why they MUST destroy him. Barry CANNOT STAND UP TO A CANDIDATE LIKE HERMAN CAIN. So, just like what happened to Jack Ryan, with help from the corrupt lamestream media.

          If it was her “boyfriend’s” idea to meet with Cain and ask for a job, why didn’t boyfriend go along? She was too embarrassed at the time to tell her boyfriend the “details” but she’s not too embarrassed today to go on global TV to tell them now?

          She worked for CBS. She worked with teachers associations. I wonder if Gloria wrote the text of her statement for her? She really did cover all bases. She had an excuse in case anybody asked her why she’d go to a Tea Party event that Cain was speaking at. Covered it! She didn’t know he’d be there. She wasn’t sexually harassed in the “workplace.” She didn’t work for him or the restaurant association then. We need a moral president? I can agree with that.

  3. This Is What Happens When Gloria Allred Gets Her Hands On Your Sex Scandal
    Nov. 7, 2011, 11:19 AM

    It is hardly a surprise that Gloria Allred has popped up as a character in the never ending Herman Cain sexual harassment circus. The feminist celebrity lawyer has been a fixture of virtually every high-profile sex scandal of the past few decades.

    The entire political press corps is pinning their hopes on Allred to come through with the salacious details that will finally put a pin in the Herman Cain bubble. In fact, Allred doesn’t actually need to say anything. Her mere association with this scandal could be enough to derail the Cain Train.

    If those cases are any indication, here’s how Allred will take down Cain:…..


    • Chicago TEA Party Lead Activist on Sharon Bialek: I did not recognize her and I was there all weekend
      by Political Arena Editor Chuck Norton

      When Sharon Bialek said that he was with Herman Cain at the Chicago TEA Party event with Herman Cain I reached out to one of the key voices and leaders of the Chicago TEA Party C. Steven Tucker and he says “I did not recognize her Chuck and I was there all weekend.

      I have been reaching out to my other friends in the Chicago TEA Party and so far no one recognizes her. Gloria Allred portrayed Bialek as a TEA Party Republican. Having seen her picture Bialek is not someone who goes unnoticed easily.

      Tucker comments further: I have spoken at Tea Party events ALL OVER Chicagoland including TeaCon Midwest 2011 where Gloria Allred says her client “confronted” Herman Cain. I have never seen nor have I ever even heard of a Sharon Bialek.

      Bailek has not been seen at any other TEA Party events. Even if she had gone to just one, why go to the one with Herman Cain and no others? It makes no sense.

      Sharon Blailek said that this happened in 1996 so where was Blailek when Herman Cain was running for Senate in 2004?

      We have been doing internet searches on Sharon Bialek. Her linkedin and all social networking/employer networking sites where her name appears seem to have been scrubbed. When you are telling the truth, why make the attempt to scrub your past?

      Speaking of not making sense, why would a supposed Republican TEA Party activist/sympathizer call a known leftist hatchet man like Gloria Allred, as any association with Allred would impune her credibility?


      • If I remember correctly, Bialek said she was INVITED to the Tea Party event. So who invited her? That person should remember. First thing I thought was she’d be remembered if she was there.

        I tried to search on her, too. Did the Google timeline PRIOR to last month. From 2007 up until BEFORE this issue with Cain arose. Google is returning all kinds of search results AS IF they’re from, say, 2009, but the snippet shown has information about Cain and these allegations. So they’re making sure nobody can find background on her. Of course they’d do that, because they had experience with scrubbing everything on Shirley Dunham and Harrison J. Bounel.

        Perfect! Why WOULD a Republican seek out ALLRED? She’s probably just now registered as a Republican.

        • I ran a search on her, “if” the same Sharon Bialek she is connected to a Norm Bialek –

          GW Holiday STaC
          Norm Bialek – Sharon Bialek, Bellevue WA: 64.12% 2.31: 8: Richard Feinberg – Jim Kelsey, Fremont CA: 63.89% 1.93: 9: James Lynch, US; Gabriella Amadeo, Calabasas Hills CA

          Top Average Percent
          Norm Bialek : 68: 56.53: 10: Faye Cerbins : 4: 56.48: 65.18: 10: Sharon Bialek : 75: 56.28: 11: Ann Hauser : 9: 56.18: 61.86

          • Hawaii…..hummm

            Summer 2006 NABC in Hawaii 1106_19 – Play Duplicate Bridge

            … Tucker – Samuel Marks, Atlanta GA; Fred King … Bill McClean – Betty Curtis, Pacific Plsds CA; Robert … Parker – Clayton Parker, Surprise AZ; Sharon Bialek – Norm …

            http://www.bridgehands.com/ Tournaments/ ACBL_NABC/ Honolulu1106/ Honolulu1106_19.html

          • I knew it, I just knew it;
            Soundex Code for Bialek = B420
            Other surnames sharing this Soundex Code:

            She is one of the family ! Just along to help out !

          • Gloria said she was born and spent most of her life in Chicago, and the information is not from Chicago. We need a middle initial and age to find the right person. Bialek is probably a married name since she is a single mom now. She also worked at WGN and for CBS radio, Chicago, where she probably had a stage name. (Link to bridge doesn’t work)

            2. Sharon Lee Bialek, age 50
            Sharon Lee Bialek
            Sharon Biatek
            Sharon Lee Blalek

            Has lived in
            Mundelein, IL
            Chicago, IL
            Des Plaines, IL

            Related to:
            Theresa A Bialek
            Chester Henry Bialek
            Susan T. Alves


            People Search had 4 listed in Chicago: Sharon L. 52, Sharon M. 59, Sharon John 60, and Sharon Lee 50.


          • I believe your right Bridgette. After looking into the name more I think this is the Sharon Bialek I found above –

            Bialek, Mary Sharon

            Possible Aka’s:
            BIALEK, SHARON

            Sun City West, AZ
            Bellevue, WA
            Selah, WA


        • According to a news article from the radio station where she worked, WGN:

          Cain accuser’s fiance: ‘She’s just trying to do the right thing’
          (Sharon Bialek and Mark Harwood in Venice, Italy in 2010 shortly after becoming engaged – photo courtesy of Mark Harwood)
          By Lisa Black Tribune reporter
          4:56 p.m. CST, November 7, 2011 Snips

          The latest woman to accuse GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment is “just trying to do the right thing,” according to her fiance who says he didn’t know about the allegations until just days ago. Mark Harwood said he is in “a bit of shock,” but stands by Sharon Bialek. “We’re in it together,” he said this afternoon. “My only concern is that it not become some type of media circus.” [Good luck with that Mark!]

          Bialek and Harwood, who is from London, have lived together for four years and have shared an upscale home in Mundelein [Illinois] for the past two, he said. She is a stay-at-home mother to a 13-year-old son and he works in the medical equipment industry.

          http://www.wgnradio.com/ news/ local/ breaking/ chi-cain-accusers-fiance-shes-just-trying-to-do-the-right-thing-20111 107, 0, 194982.story?track=rss

          • The link no longer works! That was quick. I was just reading it and went back to get the videos and photo. Maybe it was moved to a different link or else it was scrubbed. I will post it all for now.

            Cain accuser’s fiance: ‘She’s just trying to do the right thing’
            Photo of Sharon Bialek and Mark Harwood in Venice, Italy in 2010 shortly after becoming engaged (photo courtesy of Mark Harwood)
            2 videos
            By Lisa Black Tribune reporter
            4:56 p.m. CST, November 7, 2011

            The latest woman to accuse GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment is “just trying to do the right thing,” according to her fiance who says he didn’t know about the allegations until just days ago.

            Mark Harwood said he is in “a bit of shock,” but stands by Sharon Bialek.

            “We’re in it together,” he said this afternoon. “My only concern is that it not become some type of media circus.”
            “It’s not an anti-political thing, It’s not a money thing,” he added. “She’s just trying to do the right thing and that takes guts.”

            Bialek and Harwood, who is from London, have lived together for four years and have shared an upscale home in Mundelein for the past two, he said. She is a stay-at-home mother to a 13-year-old son and he works in the medical equipment industry.

            “Sharon is very much one of these women with a huge heart and always trying to do the right thing,” he said. “Sometimes I have to pull the reins in.”

            Harwood said he did not know about the Cain allegation until Friday night, when Bialek told him she was going to go to New York. He said she didn’t come forward at the time of the alleged incident in 1997 because she wasn’t a Cain employee.

            “Had she been employed by him, she would have had a much stronger case and would have gone forward,” Harwood said. “She has nothing to hide. My feeling is that it takes a lot of guts.”

            According to her attorney, Gloria Allred, Bialik met Cain through her former job with the educational foundation of the National Restaurant Association in Chicago in 1996-1997.

            After leaving the foundation, Bialek worked for five years for WGN Radio in marketing and for two and a half years at CBS Radio as managing director for non-traditional revenue, Allred said.

            Allred said Bialek earlier co-hosted a cooking show on television for nine years and worked for Revlon as an account manager and for the Easter Seals Society in corporate development.

            http://www.wgnradio.com/ news/ local/ breaking/ chi-cain-accusers-fiance-shes-just-trying-to-do-the-right-thing-20111 107, 0, 194982.story?track=rss

            • It is SO MUCH malarkey that she didn’t come forward back then because she wasn’t his employee. There’s just so much wrong with her tale. First of all, it was a SEXUAL ASSAULT. She wouldn’t have to be his employee to REPORT IT TO THE POLICE. Why didn’t she? If she just wants to do the right thing, she would have spoken up all those years ago to PROTECT OTHER WOMEN from a sexual predator. She didn’t.

              Then there’s the issue of her saying, immediately after his assault–“You know I have a boyfriend.” So in her mind, a man she barely knows who gropes her genitals, grabs her head, and SHOVES IT DOWN TO HIS CROTCH is making some kind of ROMANTIC overture? Like he wants to be her “boyfriend” but she already has one?

              Jamie Allman, radio host I listen to each morning, said that a bunch of cops he knows (from working as a reporter) called to tell him that everything their instincts tell them is she’s fabricating. Her tale would never stand up. Their CHIEF complaint–how in the presser she didn’t use the personal pronoun. She didn’t personalize what he did to HER. She instead called on him to take responsibility for his “inappropriate behavior” towards “people”. People. Not “towards me,” but towards “people”. A major tell. She also, somewhere, said her goal was to put a face on the accusations. Well, looks like she did that; but it looks to me like a prevaricating face. Cops agree; cops know all the “tells”.

  4. Speaking about Jesse Jackson, he was in hot water with a sex charge too wasn’t he ? How did that work out ?

    Good post Miri. Great points too.

    • TY. I think so, about Jackson. Did the lamestream cover it? The list goes on and on. How about how they ignored Edwards until scooped by the tabloids? They defended him until the photographic evidence PROVED his guilt. How about how they just laughed off the Kennedy “foibles”? Seems a girl got KILLED. All the DemocRATS–the lamestream covers for them. Just boys being boys. A big fat joke.

  5. At least prog Obama accomplished this:


    How the US and Israel let Iran get a nuclear arms capablity

    November 7, 2011, 5:03 PM

    Implosion experiments for nuclear bomb detonation

    Hardly a day has gone by in the last month without new revelations, mostly from US intelligence sources, confirming that Iran has either reached or is within a hand’s breadth of a nuclear weapon capability. Sunday, Nov. 6, Iran was reported to have carried out implosion experiments in a large steel container built as a testing capsule for this purpose at Parchin. Such experiments would be hard to explain away for any purpose other than the development of nuclear arms.

    Monday, Nov. 7, a Russian nuclear expert Vyacheslav Danilenko was named as having taught the Iranians how to build the R265 generator used for the implosion in the Parchin experiment. Since Danilenko was back home in Russia by 2005, Iran must be considered to have mastered the critical nuclear detonation technology as far back as six years ago.

    It is critical because before a nuclear weapon can be used, a sphere of conventional explosives must be detonated to create a blast wave that compresses a central ball of nuclear fuel into an incredibly dense mass, triggering a nuclear chain reaction and explosion.

    For six years, therefore, American and Israeli governments have kept their own people and the world ignorant of the true state of Iran’s nuclear program. Indeed in 2007, under President George W. Bush, the American government, military and intelligence agencies published a deliberately misleading National Intelligence Estimate which concluded that in 2003, Tehran had suspended intense work on the design and production of a nuclear weapon.

    The Israeli government under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert tried protesting that the report was false, but when no one listened, he lined up behind Washington. He and his foreign minister at the time Tzipi Livni brushed off anxious queries by retorting that the Iranian nuclear menace was a matter for the international community to deal with, even though the high-wire diplomacy attempted at the time was getting exactly nowhere.

    But both the US and Israeli knew the truth – that Iran was getting dangerously close to a nuclear capacity, had obtained nuclear explosives, detonators and the technology for triggering them, as well as building missiles.

    Against this backdrop, the Stuxnet malworm made its first appearance in June 2010. The virus embarked on stealthy depredations of the uranium enrichment facility’s control system in Natanz, in order to stall Iran’s stockpiling of large quantities of weapons-grade fuel

    It worked for a year or two – no more. According to US sources, Iran has since managed to accumulate enough enriched uranium for four nuclear bombs.

    That explains the comment appearing in the New York Times of Monday, Nov. 6, from a senior US official. He said the virus had run its course but some recently discovered computer worms suggested a new, improved Stuxnet 2.0 may be in the works. “There were a lot of mistakes made the first time,” he said. “This was a first-generation product. Think of Edison’s initial light bulbs or the Apple II.”

    Cyber war therefore briefly stalled Iran’s progress toward a nuclear bomb but never derailed it. The covert assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists were similarly only temporary setbacks soon overcome.

    The Iran report promised for Tuesday or Wednesday by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will show plainly that sanctions, the clandestine assassinations of scientists, the Stuxnet virus and a host of covert operations to damage the equipment on its way to Iran, never diverted Tehran long from its ruthless march on a nuclear arsenal.

    Two leaders, US President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, pledged solemnly when they assumed office never to let Iran achieve a nuclear arms capability.
    On their watch, however, Iran has achieved that capability. As things stand today, it is now only a step away from a bomb, separated by little more than a political decision to take it.

    Some experts say Iran still needs several months to produce its first weapon and a shorter period to produce each subsequent one.

    Does this leave time to intervene?
    No one knows what the US or Israeli leaders will decide to do, whether in concert or unilaterally, to rectify their grave lapse. Will they opt for living with a nuclear-armed Iran while downplaying the menace thereof or resort to a military offensive to extinguish it?

    The forthcoming IAEA report will probably disperse some of the opaque mists blurring the Iranian nuclear reality and making possible the obfuscations of the past six years. It is expected to focus on Iran’s efforts towards putting radioactive material in a warhead and developing missiles.
    Once the facts are laid out on the table for all to see, it will be that much harder for interested parties to continue to spin the facts for political expedience.

    This is what you get for electing an Obama
    Prog Left is just as prone to being vaporized as conservatives in fact maybe more so,

    New York is always the first
    DC the second

  6. Et Tu Poutus?

    the Kansas Citian
    News and Opinions on Issues That Impact Kansas City
    Thursday, November 3, 2011

    Barack Obama accused by two men of inappropriate behavior


    During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.

    The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

    In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.

    THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the identities of the two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.

    White House spokesman Jay Carney told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

    Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989. THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.

    In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.

    On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

    The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

    UPDATE: Third man comes forward to AP.
    The AP:

    A third former editor says he considered filing a workplace complaint over what he considered aggressive and unwanted behavior by Barack Obama when he worked under the president in the 1991 at the University of Chicago. He says the behavior included a private invitation to his apartment.

    He worked for the University of Chicago when he was a Visiting Law and Government Fellow. He told The Associated Press that Obama made sexually suggestive remarks or gestures about the same time that the two editors of the Harvard Law Review had settled separate harassment complaints against him. The employee described situations in which he said Obama told him he had confided to colleagues how attractive he was and invited him to his apartment outside work. He spoke on condition of anonymity, saying he feared retaliation. The White House declined to comment.

    found at repubx


    • Sounds like satire to me, but it is not listed to be so except the highlighted words refer back to articles about Herman Cain.

    • “vaguely familiar”
      Dave M does that mean that he did this so many times that he forgot these 2 men or that his memory stinks or that he has a convenient memory lapse ? May be all of the above too ? Yeah right…..
      I wonder how he would feel in Cain’s shoes ?

  7. Now that’s a “BIMBO ERUPTION” worthy of Bill Clinton. So like Clinton, all Cain needs to do is appoint a Czar for Bimbo Eruptions, like Clinton did, and the media (Jon Stewart, et al) will just begin to defend him and make jokes about his prowess. Don’t you think?

  8. Here’s the thing about Herman, it’s a she-said type of thing. I wasn’t there, and so I don’t know one way or the other. Plus that stupid woman attorney, I absolutely can’t stand that woman, if one wishes to call her a woman. Well, just don’t call her a lady. With Bill Clinton, there was proof.

    So I’m not going to falsely accuse Herman when I don’t know. It’s not been in a court of law, and anyone can say anything.

    • That’s exactly it, kittycat77. ANYONE CAN SAY ANYTHING. See what dave m posted: http://thekansascitian.blogspot.com/2011/11/barack-obama-accused-by-two-men-of.html

      There’s a story with about as much proof, and yet it’s one you won’t see on the lamestream media outlets, even if it weren’t intended as spoof or a demonstration.

      Anyone can say anything, so long as they have an agenda and live by the creed, “by any means necessary,” believing that to LIE for the “greater good”, in their own minds, is fine. Actually noble. Taqiyya is a similar concept. I’m not saying the woman is lying, but the lamestream has an OBLIGATION to verify and take “due diligence” to make sure they’re not being lied TO and USED in a partisan game.

  9. My husband asks the question: why didn’t these gals come out when Cain first started running?

    He immediately thinks something’s up with that one.

    So while we’re not saying he’s completely innocent in this, the thing is that it’s what, 14 years or so ago, if that? People do change and repent over past behavior. If that wasn’t the case, why do the Scriptures repeat over and over again about repent and/or repentance for all of mankind?

    Here’s the thing that all of us need to try to understand. All of mankind are sinners, all of us, and we will not have anyone perfect. Sure, we can have much better than what we now have, yes, and not a commie, but we will not have a perfect person. There is no such thing that exists now. What we need is someone who has known that they made mistakes, repented from it because it shows character and integrity, then tried to do their best out of love for our nation.

  10. Sharon Bialek’s Fiance Backs Her ’100 Percent’

    Mark Harwood–a native of the United Kingdom–says he’s been with Sharon Bialek for four years and they’ve been engaged for one year.


  11. Seems SHARON L. BIALEK does not know how to pay her tax’s. Low on cash Sharon?? In desperate need Sharon?

    Document No. 0919626132
    Executed Recorded 07/07/2009
    Document Type FEDERAL LIEN
    Case No.
    Amount $5,176.00


    Name: BIALEK SHARON L Trust Number:-


    Document No. 1124426199
    Executed 08/24/2011
    Recorded 09/01/2011
    Document Type STATE LIEN
    Amount $4,384.00
    Name: ILLINOIS DEPT OF REVENUE Trust Number:-
    Name: BIALEK SHARON Trust Number:-

    • Getting paid for interviews should help her get out of debt, since her apparently wealthy finance doesn’t appear to be paying her past federal or state tax liens.

  12. No, “David Axelrod” is not “connected” to Sharon Bialek; plus Cook County court records

    By Michelle Malkin • November 7, 2011 03:54 PM

    Ugh. I know the Chicago Way has a way of getting into every political story. But let’s not get off the rails here.

    Lots of people on Twitter are claiming a “connection” between Chicago resident/Herman Cain accuser Sharon Bialek and Obama guru David Axelrod.

    This is the source of the confusion: Cook County records showing a court case involving Bialek and a plaintiff represented by a “David Axelrod” of Highland Park, IL.

    He is a completely different Axelrod who practices law.

    Snip ~

    For what it’s worth, Cook County records show three court cases involving Bialek — two debt collections cases in 2009 and 2007, and one child support/paternity-related case in 1999:


    Filing Date: 07/20/2009 Case Type: CONTRACT Call Type: CT
    Division: MD District: 1 Room/Calendar:1401
    Ad Damnum:$3,539.58 Most Current Court Date:09/22/2011 Time: 0930

    Party Information

    Plaintiff(s) Attorney(s)
    1448 OLD SKOKIE RD.

    Date of Service Defendant(s) Attorney(s)
    08/29/2010 BIALEK SHARON



    Filing Date: 09/10/2007 Case Type: CONTRACT Call Type:
    Division: MD District: 1 Room/Calendar:
    Ad Damnum:$1,000.27 Most Current Court Date: Time:

    Party Information

    Plaintiff(s) Attorney(s)
    125 S WACKER DR #400
    CHICAGO IL60606


    Filing Date: 10/22/1999 Case Type: PET TO ESTABLISH PARENTAGE (NON-IV-D)
    Division: Domestic Relations Division District: First Municipal
    Ad Damnum: $0.00 Calendar: 99

    Party Information

    Plaintiff(s) Attorney(s)

    3000 DUNDEE RD#415

    NORTHBROOK IL, 60062

    (847) 272-2800

    Date of Service Defendant(s) Attorney(s)


    • Turns out that David Axelrod IS connected to Bialek. Martha McCallum of Fox reported that they lived in the same building and Bialek remembers Axelrod from the common areas.

  13. Bill Bennett: This Is Not a ‘Lynching’ of Herman Cain
    Tuesday, 08 Nov 2011 12:04 AM
    By Newsmax Wires

    • Out of the woodwork?

      This really is smelling very fishy. They made her a Republican. Did she JUST NOW register, so she can do that crossover voting in the REPUBLICAN primary? Surely there are few Republicans in Chicago. Surely Obama has the DemocRAT vote wrapped up and bogus Republicans are coming out of the woodwork, to register, so they can CHOOSE THE REPUBLICAN NOMINEE, like they did in 2008. Who’s the annointed one? Mitt Romney.

      Herman has Tea Party support, so they made her a TEA PARTIER, too. Why? Because that would be the perfect foil–to DAMAGE his support among Tea Partiers. (btw, I’m making sure to capitalize Tea Party and Tea Partier because I noticed today in two separate lamestream newspapers that they capitalize Occupy Wall Street but DO NOT CAPITALIZE Tea Party. No, they’re not important enough. Small letters for the “tea party”.)

      If that man did to you what she says he did to her, what would you do? Hug him years later at a political event OR just walk away when you saw him?

      When it happened, would you just say, “you know I have a boyfriend,” or would you slug him one, jump out of the car, call the police or AT LEAST tell your boyfriend the DETAILS? Where’d she stay that night? In the suite she claims Herman got for her? Or did she immediately go home?

      She didn’t tell her boyfriend the details but NOW, TODAY, she expects us to believe that she came forward because her 13-year-old son wanted her to. So she told her 13-year-old SON the details she couldn’t have told her adult “boyfriend” years ago? Hey, that’s cutting it pretty close, isn’t it? When was this kid conceived? Right around the time she just was traumatized by Herman’s alleged attack on her? Was she in the habit of laughing off sexual assaults, as if it happened every day?

      The sad thing about this whole deal is that nobody cares for what this is doing to Herman Cain’s family.

      • Miri, They smell money. It is what it is. Sharks, smelling the red water. If something really happened to these women, the cops were the place to go. They did not go. Actions not words. Trust instinct, like those cops. Maybe Cain is a peacock. I have met many. Flirting because they have ego and power. No one would give those swinging kind of guys anything if they did not have something to gain, so it becomes a game of powerful men taking advantage and pumping their egos, and gold gigging women that give easy sex to get ahead. It is a form of prostitution on both sides. I do not know if Cain gets out of line or not but he could. This woman out for money is just a player too. By the way Miri, it is so strange as when Allred came into the story I was uncovering that name in a family tree across the hall….very strange…one of your loved coincidences again Miri ?

    • They hugged each other backstage in a full embrace like old friends.

      She grabbed his arm and whispered in his left ear.

      She kept talking as he bent to listen, and he kept saying “Uh, huh. Uh, huh.”


      “I don’t know if what she was giving him was a sucker punch, but he didn’t put his arm down while she was talking to him,” said the Sneed source.

      ◆The “he”… is GOP presidential contender Herman Cain, who has been accused of sexual harassment by several women.

      ◆The “she”… is Chicagoan Sharon Bialek, who held a news conference Tuesday as the only woman to PUBLICLY accuse Cain of sexual harassment.

      ◆The Sneed source … is WIND radio co-host Amy Jacobson, who tells Sneed she witnessed the Cain/Bialek encounter a month ago while backstage at the AM 560 WIND sponsored TeaCon meeting in Schaumburg Sept. 30-Oct. 1 at the Renaissance Hotel and Convention Center.

      ◆Quoth Jacobson: “I had turned on TV to find out who was Cain’s accuser, and I almost fell over when I saw it was Sharon Bialek accusing Cain of groping her genitals.”

      “I was waiting for Herman Cain’s ‘Accuser No. 4’ to surface — and up pops Sharon!”

      “I couldn’t believe it. I was shocked.”

      “I recall Sharon was hell bent on going backstage at the TeaCon convention — where she cornered him,” said Jacobson.

      “I was surprised to hear she claims she did not know Cain was going to be there. Cain was expected and was late.”

      Bialek told the media on Monday: “I went up to him and asked him if he remembered me. I wanted to see if he would be man enough to own up to what he had done 14 years ago.”

      ◆The encounter: “It looked sort of flirtatious,” said Jacobson. “I mean they were hugging. But she could have been giving him the kiss of death for all I know. I had no idea what they were talking about, but she was inches from his ear.”

      ◆The introduction: “It all began when I took a convention break and joined my pals at the hotel bar. Sharon was drinking Mimosas with them. She said she was a Republican, a Tea Party member, had once dated [White Sox sports announcer’ Steve Stone] and had worked at WGN radio.”

      ◆The rendezvous: Sharon also said she was anxious to meet Cain again and had once gone to an afterparty with him and her boyfriend years ago. But she never mentioned he had sexually harassed her.”

      ◆The upshot: Bialek has since applied for employment in sales at WIND radio and is scheduled for a second interview Thursday.

    • She LOOKS so traumatized. Why would you pose for a photo with a man who did what she wants us to believe he did? Smooth operator?

      • Smooth operator?


        • Copying this in its entirety in the interest of education. The story was locking up on me and I fear it will be disappeared:

          “The Cain Encounter … They hugged each other backstage in a full embrace like old friends. She grabbed his arm and whispered in his left ear. She kept talking as he bent to listen, and he kept saying “Uh, huh. Uh, huh.” Huh?

          “I don’t know if what she was giving him was a sucker punch, but he didn’t put his arm down while she was talking to him,” said the Sneed source.

          The “he”… is GOP presidential contender Herman Cain, who has been accused of sexual harassment by several women. The “she”… is Chicagoan Sharon Bialek, who held a news conference Tuesday as the only woman to PUBLICLY accuse Cain of sexual harassment. The Sneed source … is WIND radio co-host Amy Jacobson, who tells Sneed she witnessed the Cain/Bialek encounter a month ago while backstage at the AM 560 WIND sponsored TeaCon meeting in Schaumburg Sept. 30-Oct. 1 at the Renaissance Hotel and Convention Center.

          Quoth Jacobson: “I had turned on TV to find out who was Cain’s accuser, and I almost fell over when I saw it was Sharon Bialek accusing Cain of groping her genitals.”

          “I was waiting for Herman Cain’s ‘Accuser No. 4’ to surface — and up pops Sharon!”

          I couldn’t believe it. I was shocked.”

          “I recall Sharon was hell bent on going backstage at the TeaCon convention — where she cornered him,” said Jacobson.

          “I was surprised to hear she claims she did not know Cain was going to be there. Cain was expected and was late.” [This indicates to me that this plan was in effect for over a month. The SET UP.]

          Bialek told the media on Monday: “I went up to him and asked him if he remembered me. I wanted to see if he would be man enough to own up to what he had done 14 years ago.”

          The encounter: “It looked sort of flirtatious,” said Jacobson. “I mean they were hugging. But she could have been giving him the kiss of death for all I know. I had no idea what they were talking about, but she was inches from his ear.” [Is that how YOU would behave with a man who sexually assaulted you?]

          The introduction: “It all began when I took a convention break and joined my pals at the hotel bar. Sharon was drinking Mimosas with them. She said she was a Republican, a Tea Party member, had once dated (White Sox sports announcer’ Steve Stone) and had worked at WGN radio.” [So it sounds like she is a name dropper, a celebrity chaser, AND was hanging with those people because she was, once again, schmoozing for a job.]

          The rendezvous: Sharon also said she was anxious to meet Cain again and had once gone to an afterparty with him and her boyfriend years ago. But she never mentioned he had sexually harassed her.”

          The upshot: Bialek has since applied for employment in sales at WIND radio and is scheduled for a second interview Thursday.”

  14. Fifth Woman Says Cain Was Inappropriate


    maybe she didn’t like the wine; or, whatever. LOL

    • Maybe he did not like the wine either joanne…400 dollars a bottle, and 2 bottles ? and he did not pay the bill ? Wonder who did ?

    • joanne, From the link above;
      A former employee of the United States Agency for International Development says GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain asked her to set up a dinner date with a woman in the audience following a paid speech he gave nine years ago.

      Donna Donella, 40, of Arlington, Va., told the Washington Examiner that the agency paid Cain to present the speech in Egypt in 2002, during which an Egyptian businesswoman in her 30s asked Cain a question.

      Afterward, “Cain came over to me and a colleague and said, ‘Could you put me in touch with that lovely young lady who asked the question, so I can give her a more thorough answer over dinner?” Donella said.

      Donella declined, to which Cain responded, “Then you and I can have dinner.”


      Cain’s wife. I feel so sorry for her right now more then anyone. If her husband’s brain turns to mush on skirts behind her back she is hurt. If it is all lies she is hurt. Either way, she is the one here getting the sucker punches. If any of this is actually true she should give hubby the boot. Political dreams or none.
      This entire story makes my nose turn up in disgust. Low….Lies…sneaky…dirty…garbage. All of it.

      • You’re correct, Renee. I DO feel sorry for his wife. It’s sad that these people are coming out of the woodwork and it still stinks to high heaven. Why now? When Romney was behind and Cain was surging? Why didn’t they come out all the other times Cain ran for office? A woman who works for USAID, the same place Obama’s mother worked, comes out with this crap? I’m sorry, but it sounds like taquiyya lies to me. Arlington, VA. Home of so many spies and double-crossers. Black ops. It is DISGUSTING. Anybody can SAY anything, especially a decade later. They know where he was and when, so easy to fabricate. Interesting that the photographic evidence we have to date proves that Accuser #4 was more than on speaking terms with her assaulter only a little over a month ago. How is that? This is Kabuki theater, like with all things progressive. They forget that other people have cameras, too. It even sounds as if they’ve now figured out how to PHRASE the lies to make them sound as if they came from Herman. Speaking like him, “lovely young lady.” The people who worked with him at the restaurant association stood behind him, said there was nothing to the allegations, but as we know, organizations pay people off to go away BECAUSE they have to gamble with a jury or a judge, can’t be sure of the outcome, and if they lose, they have to pay the accuser’s LEGAL fees which can run into the milllions. Far more than just paying her to go away. It’s a scam. The lawyers like Allred know how to play the game.

        So far, my local TV didn’t cover the story BUT they cleverly found a way to do it. Gloria Allred’s DAUGHTER, Lisa Bloom, has a book out about how girls are socialized to be sex objects (duh!). She was on the news program to hype her book. (I didn’t know Lisa Bloom is Allred’s daughter.) From what she said about her book and how we live in this celebrity culture where girls spend more time watching reality TV, Snookie and the Kardashians, I figured she’d HAVE TO disagree with her mother on this Cain spectacle. NO! They had the presser all cued up and they had Lisa Bloom saying how important it is to expose this. At the end of the interlude, she RUSHED, literally RUSHED, speaking very fast, to get in a statement about how Cain is a “SERIAL ABUSER.” Note the meme.

        I heard that yesterday (this is SO disappointing) Britt Hume and Charles Krauthammer said the same thing. The sheer NUMBER of accusers would sink his candidacy. He’s toast. So it makes sense that they will be piling on. As in 2008, it’s a done deal. Romney will be shoved down our throats. They act as if they don’t want to run against him, but he’s the best case scenario for Obama. Romney has flipped on so many issues. He’s got Romneycare hanging around his neck, so he can’t fight Obama on Obamacare. He’s the next best thing to McCain. And be sure they will use his religion against him AND they probably have an October surprise all lined up.

  15. Gallup: Cain tied with Romney, most are skeptical of charges – The Hill’s Ballot Box
    Despite the harassment allegations swirling around him, Herman Cain is now running even with Mitt Romney in the race for the Republican presidential nomination, according to a new Gallup poll released Monday.

    The USA Today/Gallup poll found Cain and Romney tied atop the GOP field, with each winning 21 percent of support from Republicans and Republican-leaning independents

    • This ploy is going to backfire because common sense will win out. There is SO MUCH WRONG with that woman’s tale. It makes NO SENSE. NOBODY would act like she says she acted or SAY what she says she said, under those circumstances. If it were I, Herman would not have been able to walk for several months. And he would never have any more kids, either, if you get my drift.

      COMMON SENSE. His polls will probably go up after today. I love how they had the opposition research ready and came out swinging against her. They claim he has no organization but they had their evidence lined up.

  16. I have distrust of Romney. This did not help my feelings about him at all. I would never vote for him. I am thinking about people that do dirty tricks to other people and others that hit on women non stop. Neither are presidential material. I saw that other guy too yesterday, the one that took pics of his stuff, naked on his phone. He said it is his art. I say it is his freak, perverted mind. His art ? Who buys that garbage ? People that show their privates are not suited for public office or as role models. WHO would want him ? Do we have ANYONE clean ? Are we this desperate REALLY ? Bottom of the barrel scraping if you ask me. Yuck. I feel sorry for Cain’s wife. How embarrasing for her. It all smells. All of them smell. Dirty games and such show immature people that cannot be trusted at all. I cannot stand that type of a person. Ruthless and dirty games for what ? To what end ? Not worth it. Like street garbage. Kick it out of your way and keep going forward.

    • And it just gets frustrating because we ask: is there anyone out there decent to be leader? Well, it kind of reveals to us as a nation that we need to get our act together. When you have a nation, and I’m speaking generally, with a lot of people who have no morals, lying, stealing, cheating, etc., are the norm for them, then that’s the kind of leader(s) that we can end up with.

      • I know Kitty. It is very sad because we do have good people too, if they would just stand up and say “NO MORE”

      • kittycat77: You’re right but the thing is: EVEN IF the person IS decent, the political system and the dirty tricks DESTROY them. Look what they did to a good and very Christian man, John Ashcroft. It’s disgusting. Like Sarah Palin says, they just MAKE THINGS UP. They tried so hard to destroy Sarah. Actually, the smears worked. Her polls stink, for no reason other than that the lamestream media did a PROPAGANDA campaign against her. It becomes obvious that We the People will never be able to FAIRLY choose our candidates BECAUSE the elites, including the lamestream media, will RULE US BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

        The so-called journalists have no honor. They have betrayed the trust given to them by the First Amendment. They have no conscience. Andrea Mitchell was recently LAUGHING about the concept of a “journalistic code of ethics.” Well they WOULD LAUGH because they HAVE NO ETHICS.

        These same people who now make an “elder statesman” out of Bill Clinton who ADMITTED his serial sexual predations, criticize Cain and destroy his family. For what? POWER. Even IF he’s the masher they make him out to be, so the eff WHAT? Clinton is no better and he’s not only survived, he’s an ICON of the left. As is Kennedy. (John as well as Ted).

        It makes me so angry that I could spit. We the People have the POWER to not allow them to do this. We can stand behind Cain, no matter what. If he’s guilty, so what? The libs didn’t let Clinton’s guilt stand in his way or their way. They stood behind him. They said it doesn’t matter. It’s between him and his wife. It’s a personal matter. His private life doesn’t affect how he runs the country. So, the CLINTON STANDARD APPLIES here.

        IF they say it’s a crime, then let Bialek press charges. Let Cain have his day in court. Let the lamestream and Ms. Bialek PROVE THEIR ACCUSATIONS. In the meantime, UNDER OUR SYSTEM, UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, HE’S INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

        http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/11/08/110811-news-cain-accuser-1-3/ Works in the Obama administration.

        “Karen Kraushaar currently serves as a communications director at the Inspector General’s Office of the Treasury Department, a position she has held since last year. [Works for Geithner?] She did not return phone messages left by The Daily. …

        After the settlement, Kraushaar served as a spokeswoman for the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, the predecessor of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. She was a chief spokeswoman during one of the agency’s most controversial immigration cases — the custody battle over Elian Gonzalez, a Cuban boy rescued at sea who was then held by Florida relatives against the will of his father in Cuba. The boy was eventually returned to his dad.

        In 2003, Kraushaar was a communications specialist for the Tax Advocate Service, an independent arm within the Internal Revenue Service that helps impoverished taxpayers.”

        So her FAMILY comes forward. She doesn’t.

  17. Renee.
    Maybe, as some will say, “Its the sign of the times”. I agree with you, its like wading through garbage trying to find a decent person in politics.

  18. Do we have the right to love whoever we choose? Think before answering. Its a loaded question to be sure. However given her husbands history, what there is of it, Ms Obama most likely believes that to be true.
    “CNS News reported from Chicago that first lady Michelle Obama told two audiences at Democratic fundraisers that the justices her husband appointed to the Supreme Court “will protect the right to love whomever we choose.”


    • Obviously, we have that right. She’s speaking in code, though, as if somehow the government keeps gays from loving people of their choice. Which is untrue. How can anybody or any government prevent anyone from loving? They can’t. Maybe she has some special interest here, ya think? Think: Larry Sinclair.

      • An amendment to my statement: LOVE is NOT EQUAL TO SEX ACTS. LOVE is in the HEART and SOUL. Maybe to MO, “love” IS “sex” but not in my book.

  19. Rosemary Woodhouse

    I can’t stand what they are doing to Cain. As with Palin, they obviously are afraid that Cain could actually beat You-Know-Who. It’s all so transparent, isn’t it? At least, in their machinations, they hold true to their transparency claim. So, yes, Cain probably is toast.

    We all know, Stan A ‘s Baby (“it’s an anagram”, states Rosemary snarkily) has almost completely destroyed the country, but not irrevocably. Not yet. He needs another term to accomplish that task. A final push off the precipice and into the abyss.

    But there is Newt. His “baggage” has been accepted as fact; indicative of a major character flaw. Here’s his daughter’s take on things.


    • That’s an interesting point, Rosemary. Gingrich’s baggage. How is it that he’s held to this higher standard but icons of the left are not? The Gingrich’s aren’t allowed to have private lives that are PRIVATE. The media hyped that lie about Newt Gingrich which HAD TO HURT his family, but they didn’t CARE.

      “It was the spring of 1980.

      I was 13 years old, and we were about to leave Fairfax, Va., and drive to Carrollton, Ga., for the summer. My parents told my sister and me that they were getting a divorce as our family of four sat around the kitchen table of our ranch home.

      Soon afterward, my mom, sister and I got into our light-blue Chevrolet Impala and drove back to Carrollton.

      Later that summer, Mom went to Emory University Hospital in Atlanta for surgery to remove a tumor. While she was there, Dad took my sister and me to see her.

      It is this visit that has turned into the infamous hospital visit about which many untruths have been told. I won’t repeat them. You can look them up online if you are interested in untruths. But here’s what happened:

      My mother and father were already in the process of getting a divorce, which she requested.

      Dad took my sister and me to the hospital to see our mother.

      She had undergone surgery the day before to remove a tumor.

      The tumor was benign.

      As with many divorces, it was hard and painful for all involved, but life continued.

      As have many families, we have healed; we have moved on.

      We are not a perfect family, but we are knit together through common bonds, commitment and love.

      My mother and father are alive and well, and my sister and I are blessed to have a close relationship with them both.

      My sister and I feel that it is time to move on, close the book on this event and focus on building a great future. We will not answer additional questions or make additional comments regarding this meaningless incident, which occurred more than three decades ago.

      As I said, my mother is a private person. She will not give media interviews. She deserves respect and should be allowed to live in peace.”

      I am astounded by this. All I knew was that she had cancer and I thought she died. The lies are outrageous lies. She had a BENIGN tumor. She didn’t die. They already planned to divorce. Gosh, I feel so sorry for those kids. I guess Sarah Palin knows how these people feel. Do the disgusting turds in the lamestream? I doubt it. By any means necessary. To them, conservatives are sub-human, so they don’t need to care about their feelings. Like Bradlee said, they “have it coming.” Why? Because they’re conservative.

    • Took me a while, but I got your anagram, Rosemary. Love seeing you here! 🙂

  20. Rosemary Woodhouse

    ignore comma after “we all know” as well as after so. t/y

  21. Are they just completely stupid? Looks so and it’s to Cain’s advantage:

    “Martha MacCallum, FOX News: “One of the things is that you lived at a 505 North Lake Shore Drive apartment, right? This is the same building, it happens to be the same building David Axelrod lives in. Do you know David Axelrod? Ever have any interaction with him at all?

    Sharon Bialek, Cain accuser: “I saw him in the gym. I mean — everybody nods to each other. It is friendly building but I never had any interaction with him.””

    Can you believe this? She KNOWS Axelrod. Lived in the same building. Good work, Martha!

  22. Has anyone seen this new story ? I have a post across the hall for your comments please. Then I can keep all of the info in one place.
    A Little On Malcolm X | Wtpotus Research Blog Renee | November 8, 2011 at 9:30 am | Reply

  23. Do we get the truth from the UK, once again?

    “A ‘gold digger’ embroiled in legal and financial difficulties who has always lived above her station and will do anything to never have to work again.

    This is the portrait that has started to emerge of the fourth woman to accuse Herman Cain of sexual harassment – the first to come out publicly.

    Though her lawyer Gloria Allred painted a respectable and prestigious education and employment history for Sharon Bialek, 50, just a day later it has been revealed that she has not held a job for more than two years and has filed for bankruptcy twice. … Meanwhile, a friend of Ms Bialek, from Chicago, told the New York Post: ‘She has a very infectious personality. It’s easy to see how she won [Cain] over. But the reality of her situation is — she’s a complete gold digger. It’s all about the money.’

    Adding that she was from a middle-income family but lives in a posh house while running from bill collectors, the source said: ‘Most of her jobs ended in termination. It’s always the employer’s fault, not hers.

    ‘This is a lady who lives off the system. She is hellbent on finding a way of never having to work and living the lifestyle she wants to live, a very affluent lifestyle.’ [That’s her FRIEND talking.] … Her father, Chester Bialek, said he did not know about his daughter’s allegation until Monday … When asked about the potential effects on her teenage son’s life, the single mother said: ‘He’s the love of my life… I want him to know that his mommy did something good for women, that she stood up for what she believed in, and I think that’s a more important lesson to learn.’ [BELIEVED IN? BELIEVED? Is she self-delusional now?] … Cain revealed over the weekend that it is his wife Gloria who has been hardest hit by the decades-old allegations.
    But his popularity among the voters has also taken a hit as the percentage of Republicans who view the Tea Party darling favourably dropped 9 percentage points.

    And among all registered voters, Cain’s popularity declined 5 percentage points, to 32 per cent from 37 per cent.”

    Of course. That was their GOAL with this bogus story. btw, Allred’s daughter CLAIMS that Gloria was contacted BY the accuser. She claims Gloria NEVER goes out and solicits clients. That would be unethical. Right.

    • Yes Miri, truth from across the pond again. They found the same end we did.
      It’s all in the names Miri. Just too funny I had just posted the Allred name when this story broke. Another coincidence Miri, for you. I know you love those things…

  24. http://wtpotusresearchblog.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/akhtar-hameed-khan-and-s-ann-dunham/

    Leza and Renee have found some interesting connections between S. Ann Dunham and a Dr. Akhtar Hameed Khan.

  25. I heard that Cain will speak to answer these claims at 5 this afternoon, Eastern. So 4 CDT.

  26. http://patdollard.com/2011/11/bialek-deconstructed-accustations-quickly-erode-under-scrutiny/

    You can’t make this stuff up! Bialek was fired from the National Restaurant Association for FALSELY accusing someone of sexual harassment.

  27. http://biggovernment.com/jjmnolte/2011/11/07/exclusive-source-confirms-latest-accuser-attended-teacon-2011-where-herman-cain-was-featured-speaker/

    This story says she registered as a Republican in Chicao ONLY in 2006, and she voted in the Republican primary (probably for McCain). In 2008, she voted in the general election. Yes, I bet for OBAMA. But nobody knows for sure. So she’s not a life-long Republican. Only registered as Republican in 2006, when Barry started running for potus. Hmmmm. http://macsmind.com/wordpress/2011/11/07/sharon-bailek-remembered-by-a-co-worker-as-a-time-waster-and-rabble-rouser-if-she-didnt-get-her-way-she-cried-sexual-harassment/ Some background on her from co-workers.

    • If you think about it: WHEN exactly did she live in the same building as Axelrod? 2006, perhaps? When he was running Barry’s campaign?

    • According to the headline of your article, it looks like she already has tried this before. “Sharon Bailek, “Remembered by a co-worker as a time-waster, and rabble-rouser. If she didn’t get her way she cried sexual harassment.”

      An acquaintance in the radio business that knows Sharon was on Megan’s show and was at the Tea Party where Sharon confronted Herman. The lady said she kept asking where he was. She saw her go up to him and whisper in his ear after giving him a hug! Does one hug a person that assaulted you? Hardly. The lady wasn’t close enough to hear what was said to him.

      • She saw her go up to him and whisper in his ear after giving him a hug!

        SCARY woman….

      • Politics Chicago Radio Host Describes Cain-Accuser Encounter to Beck: She ‘Bum Rushed’ Me to Hug Him
        November 8, 2011 Snips

        Here’s how the Chicago Sun Times covers the news:

        They hugged each other backstage in a full embrace like old friends.
        She grabbed his arm and whispered in his left ear.
        She kept talking as he bent to listen, and he kept saying “Uh, huh. Uh, huh.”
        “I don’t know if what she was giving him was a sucker punch, but he didn’t put his arm down while she was talking to him,” said the Sneed source.

        The Sneed source … is WIND radio co-host Amy Jacobson, who tells Sneed she witnessed the Cain/Bialek encounter a month ago while backstage at the AM 560 WIND sponsored TeaCon meeting in Schaumburg Sept. 30-Oct. 1 at the Renaissance Hotel and Convention Center.

        Quoth Jacobson: “I had turned on TV to find out who was Cain’s accuser, and I almost fell over when I saw it was Sharon Bialek accusing Cain of groping her genitals.”


          • This woman sounds as if she’s now saying that Bialek confronted Cain at that Tea Party event, and she believes Bialek. So this reporter sounds like she’s a progressive. Beck was nice to her, but she is already on record saying that she DIDN’T know what Bialek said to Cain. Beck says he was with Cain afterwards and Cain didn’t ACT as if she confronted him. And Bialek herself said that she didn’t confront him. So why would Bialek take a photo with Cain with his arm around her? This reporter sounds as if she’s somewhat of a feminist and also said she’s be harassed, so maybe not the most unbiased source. She said something like Bialek gave her no reason NOT to believe her but that she did act (my word) ditzy, which was unfortunate. Somebody should REMIND this reporter that in this country Cain is innocent until proven guilty. It’s Bialek’s job to PROVE BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT THAT WHAT SHE SAYS IS TRUE. It’s not Bialek’s place to be BELIEVED IMMEDIATELY AND ASSUREDLY, UNLESS SHE GIVES THE REPORTER SOME REASON NOT TO BELIEVE HER. The burden of proof is on the accuser. The PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE is with the ACCUSED. This woman has it backwards.

            For what it’s worth, Bialek has given plenty of reasons why we should doubt her. btw, I consider myself a feminist, and I’ve experienced incidents like this, too, which I HANDLED. But not like Bialek is doing. Her story doesn’t make sense. If it doesn’t make sense, it’s likely not true.

            • She also says Bialek is “an aggressive woman.” IF so, then she would have slugged him IF Cain did what she claims he did.

    • She’s not selling her story but she’s on multiple interviews on morning shows. They pay everybody who appears on camera, I think. So how long until somebody writes a book for her?

      • What no courts would accept as untainted you try on the drive by media:

        As newly reviewed records pointed to deeper financial problems for the Chicago-area woman accusing Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment, he wasted no time Tuesday in suggesting she is motivated by monetary gain.

        Sharon Bialek’s fiance — who said he is her primary source of financial support — is unemployed and preparing to file for bankruptcy, according to Lake County court documents reviewed Tuesday by the Tribune. And in Cook County, lawsuits show she has been targeted by creditors who claimed she owed them thousands in unpaid rent, personal loans and credit card bills.

        In a round of TV interviews, Bialek, 50, said she had no financial reasons for coming forward and had not been promised a job in exchange for accusing Cain of groping her in a parked car 14 years ago. She sought to downplay past financial problems.


        • Who is paying Gloria Allred? Bialek apparently doesn’t have the financial resources to do it? What is Sharon getting paid?

          She had no financial reasons for coming forward? Perhaps not now … if she was paid to smear Cain ahead of that statement!

        • Whoa! Here I was thinking her fiance was a sugar daddy. Big shot in that company. So now he’s unemployed? What happened?

          Very interesting that she said she had no financial reason but then she also told McCallum that writing a book is way “down the road.” I read that she claimed she’s not paying Allred, but somebody is. You better believe it.

    • David Axelrod’s pattern of sexual misbehavior
      by Ann Coulter
      Nov. 9 Snips

      Herman Cain has spent his life living and working all over the country – Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington, D.C. but never in Chicago.

      So it’s curious that all the sexual harassment allegations against Cain emanate from Chicago: home of the Daley machine and Obama consigliere David Axelrod.

      Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O’Grady, who is close with David Axelrod and went straight from being former Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley’s chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association (IRA), as being the person who dug up Herman Cain’s personnel records from the National Restaurant Association (NRA).

      The Daley-controlled IRA works hand-in-glove with the NRA.

      After O’Grady’s name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Cain’s personnel files from the NRA, she issued a Clintonesque denial of any involvement in producing them – by vigorously denying that she knew Cain when he was at the NRA. (Duh.)

      And now, after a week of conservative eye-rolling over unspecified, anonymous accusations against Cain, we’ve suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of … Chicago.

      Throw in some federal tax evasion, and she’s Obama’s next Cabinet pick.

      The reason all this is relevant is that both Axelrod and Daley have a history of smearing political opponents by digging up claims of sexual misconduct against them.

      This time, Obama’s little helpers have not only thrown a bomb into the Republican primary, but are hoping to destroy the man who deprives the Democrats of their only argument in 2012: If you oppose Obama, you must be a racist.


      • That is AMAZING WORK! Good job Ann Coulter. Good job WND. GREAT FIND, Bridgette! Amazing. I knew the old corrupt Chicago Thugocracy was behind this.

      • Doesn’t this sound like what happened to Linda Tripp? They illegally accessed her personnel records, looking for dirt. That was the corrupt Chicago thugocracy, too. Headed by Hillary Clinton. Of Chicago. They have NO HONOR. Which is why a NATIONAL database with everybody’s health records in it is SO dangerous. Which is also why Barry has his peeps SCRUB everything about him from every database and seeks to make sure he’s NEVER in any databases. Executive orders. New legislation proposed to seal all his records forever. They want the data on YOU. They want to be able to illegally go into it and find ANYTHING they can to blackmail and intimidate YOU with, but reserve the prerogative, via their friends in the Internet industry, to scrub-a-dub-dub their own histories.

        • You really have to read the entire article to see it all in perspective. Blair Hull. I forgot all about him. Remember the Jack Ryan affair, though. But see how the REPORTER eventually admits OBAMA WAS BEHIND THE SMEARS:

          “In 2007, long after Obama was safely ensconced in the U.S. Senate, the New York Times reported: “The Tribune reporter who wrote the original piece (on Hull’s sealed divorce records) later acknowledged in print that the Obama camp had ‘worked aggressively behind the scenes’ to push the story.”

          Some had suggested, the Times article continued, that Axelrod had “an even more significant role – that he leaked the initial story.””

  28. H/T Papoose

    Why won’t the agenda-driven media report on Barack Obama being gay, sexually harassing male actor Kal Penn, and frequenting Chicago bathhouse Man’s Country…you know, the way they leaped to trash Herman Cain with unsubstantiated sexual innuendo?
    Kevin DuJan
    Nov. 7

    Last week, the agenda-driven, drive-by media trashed Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain with unsubstantiated and poorly sourced sexual innuendo.

    This week, let’s all talk about Democrat President Barack Obama being gay, him sexually harassing male actor Kal Penn, and his frequenting of Chicago gay bathhouse “Man’s Country” — using the Left’s established precedent for journalistic integrity when it comes to rumor and gossip.

    Fair’s fair, right — in love, politics, and what’s apparently allowable in the 2012 election now that all-out war was declared on the black Republican presidential contender. Why shouldn’t conservatives treat Barack Obama the way the Left treated Herman Cain? If the operating assumption is that anything whispered about by anonymous sources is true about Herman Cain, then I guess everything people in Chicago have talked about for years related to Barack Obama being a closeted gay man into younger Pakistani guys must be true too, right?


    • Some interesting insights in the article above.

      In the black community, this is called “being on the down-low”, where a closeted gay male weds an often-times gruff and demanding woman (typically without other male suitors of her own) to take public scrutiny off them both and afford the pair a successful life they’d never achieve separately.

      There are, apparently, a lot of such relationships forged at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago — where Barack Obama’s pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, oversaw the coupling of down-low gay black men with sour and caustic black women.

      UPDATE: We have more on this at The HillBuzz & Mrs. Fox Show, where we ask “Is Barack Obama Gay?” Kevin DuJan and Megan Fox talk about the double standard for sex scandals in politics, where Republicans are always guilty without evidence and Democrats’ secrets are forever protected.

      In addition, I listened to their radio program, and it was quite humorous.
      They intend to use information like Politico now does since they lowered the bar for journalism..through anonymous sources and innuendo…and some really truthful information about Obama that is well known in Chicago.

    • Good catch, Papoose! I TOTALLY forgot about Kal Penn and what happened to him. I bet “REGGIE LOVE” could tell some tales. If Reg lived long enough to, that is. I wonder if ole Reg has a bank vault somewhere with videotaped testimony in it? Better have.

  29. Herman’s response:
    “As Ms. Sharon Bialek has placed herself in the public spotlight through making patently false allegations against Herman Cain, it is only fair to compare her track record alongside Mr. Cain’s.

    In stark contrast to Mr. Cain’s four decades spent climbing the corporate ladder rising to the level of CEO at multiple successful business enterprises, Ms. Bialek has taken a far different path.

    The fact is that Ms. Bialek has had a long and troubled history, from the courts to personal finances – which may help explain why she has come forward 14 years after an alleged incident with Mr. Cain, powered by celebrity attorney and long term Democrat donor Gloria Allred.

    In the courts, Ms. Bialek has had a lengthy record in the Cook County Court system over various civil lawsuits. The following cases on file in Cook County are:

    · 2000-M1-707461 Defendant against Broadcare Management
    · 2000-M1-714398 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management
    · 2000-M1-701522 Defendant in lawsuit against Broadcare Management
    · 2005-M1-111072 Defendant in lawsuit against Mr. Mark Beatovic.
    · 2007-M1-189176 Defendant in lawsuit against Midland Funding.
    · 2009-M1-158826 Defendant in lawsuit against Illinois Lending.

    Ms. Bialek was also sued in 1999 over a paternity matter according to ABC 7 Chicago (WLS-TV). Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

    In personal finances, PACER (Federal Court) records show that Ms. Bialek has filed for bankruptcy in the Northern District of Illinois bankruptcy court in 1991 and 2001. The respective case numbers according to the PACER system are 1:01-bk-22664 and 1:91-bk-23273.

    Ms. Bialek has worked for nine employers over the last seventeen years. Source: WLS-TV, November 7, 2011

    Curiously, if Ms. Bialek had intended to take legal action, the statute of limitations would have passed a decade ago.

    Which brings up the question of why she would make such reprehensible statements now?

    The questions should bewho is financing her legal team, have any media agreed to pay for her story, and has she been offered employment for taking these actions?” http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/11/cain-goes-on-offense-releases-statement-attacking-accuser-sharon-bialek/

  30. Bill never wanted to leave the WH…and he wants Hillary to have 3 terms..no doubt! Your time is up Bill and it is for Hillary too. Marxists are going down!

    Bill Clinton Supports Changing 22nd Amendment on Presidential Term Limits
    November 8, 2011 Snips

    Former President Bill Clinton says he supports a new “rule” in dealing with limits to presidential governance. After individuals serve two terms, he says they should be able to serve a third — with a few caveats.

    First and foremost, this regulation, should it be adopted, shouldn’t apply to anyone who has already served. Also, the former president would want the individual seeking a third round in the White House to take some time off after his or her second term.

    When co-host Joe Scarborough asked, “Shouldn’t a president be able to take two terms, take time off and run again? Shouldn’t Americans have that choice?,” Clinton answered affirmatively….


    • Bill Clinton can take his ideas and shove them where the sun don’t shine. I was just reading another article about that topic. Isn’t it hilarious that Scarborough’s proposal parallels what’s happening right now in RUSSIA? Good role model, Joe. We all want to be Soviets. We’re not a parliamentary system, Bill. We’re a REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC, whether you like it or not. We have a CONSTITUTION that We the People have the right to amend, if WE the PEOPLE so choose. We don’t want DYNASTIES in the USA. Why doesn’t Bill go run against Putin? Hey! Know what? Papandreou is out of a jop; maybe he wants to come and run against Barry for potus.

    • Case Information Summary for Case Number

      Filing Date: 7/20/2009
      Case Type: CONTRACT
      Division: Municipal Division
      District: First Municipal
      Ad Damnum: $3539.58

      Party Information



      1448 OLD SKOKIE RD.
      HIGHLAND PA IL, 60035
      (847) 579-9700

      Date of Service



      Case Activity

      Activity Date: 7/20/2009
      Court Room: 1102
      Court Fee: 219.00
      Ad Damnum Amount: 3539.58
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 7/20/2009
      Participant: BIALEK SHARON
      Date: 8/18/2009

      Activity Date: 8/14/2009
      Date: 8/13/2009

      Activity Date: 8/25/2009
      Participant: BIALEK SHARON
      Court Room: 1102
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 8/26/2009
      Date: 10/6/2009
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Fee: 6.00
      Amount: 3539.58
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 8/26/2009
      Participant: BIALEK SHARON
      Date: 10/6/2009
      Amount: 3539.58
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 8/26/2009
      Microfilm: MD001051707

      Activity Date: 9/21/2009
      Date: 9/3/2009

      Activity Date: 1/7/2010
      Date: 2/9/2010
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Fee: 6.00
      Amount: 3539.58
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 1/7/2010
      Date: 2/9/2010
      Amount: 3539.58
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 2/2/2010
      Date: 1/22/2010

      Activity Date: 2/9/2010
      Date: 2/23/2010
      Court Time: 0915
      Court Room: 1102

      Activity Date: 2/23/2010
      Microfilm: MD000233914

      Activity Date: 2/23/2010
      Date: 3/30/2010
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1102
      Microfilm: MD000233914

      Activity Date: 3/3/2010
      Attorney: PRO SE

      Activity Date: 3/3/2010 Participant: BIALEK SHARON
      Attorney: PRO SE

      Activity Date: 3/3/2010 Participant: BIALEK SHARON
      Date: 3/15/2010
      Court Time: 0200
      Court Room: 1102
      Attorney: PRO SE

      Activity Date: 3/15/2010
      Microfilm: MD000332151

      Activity Date: 3/30/2010
      Microfilm: MD000373849

      Activity Date: 3/30/2010
      Microfilm: MD000373849

      Activity Date: 3/30/2010
      Judgment Amount: 3539.58
      Microfilm: MD000373849

      Activity Date: 3/30/2010
      Microfilm: MD000373849

      Activity Date: 4/28/2010
      Date: 6/3/2010
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1401
      Court Fee: 45.00
      Amount: 3539.58
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 6/3/2010
      Date: 7/8/2010
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1401
      Microfilm: MD000751750

      Activity Date: 7/8/2010
      Date: 8/12/2010
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1401
      Microfilm: MD000870360

      Activity Date: 8/12/2010
      Date: 9/16/2010
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1401
      Microfilm: MD001042348

      Activity Date: 9/13/2010
      Date: 8/29/2010

      Activity Date: 9/16/2010
      Microfilm: MD001162561

      Activity Date: 12/9/2010
      Microfilm: MD001580593

      Activity Date: 5/12/2011
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 5/12/2011
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 5/12/2011
      Date: 6/2/2011
      Court Time: 0915
      Court Room: 1401
      Attorney: AXELROD DAVID J & ASSOC

      Activity Date: 6/2/2011
      Date: 6/2/2011
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1401
      Microfilm: MD000742978

      Activity Date: 8/18/2011
      Microfilm: MD001091610

      Activity Date: 8/18/2011
      Date: 9/22/2011
      Court Time: 0930
      Court Room: 1401
      Microfilm: MD001091610

      Activity Date: 9/22/2011

    • Somebody already debunked that. It’s a different David Axelrod. Not to say he couldn’t be related to the other one. Who knows? Not exactly a common name, is it?

  31. I don’t know if you guys are listening to Cain, but I trust that he’s innocent. I’m so sick of all of those accusations.

  32. Cain’s Press Conference

    “The charges and accusations simply didn’t happen!” I didn’t know who this woman was when I saw her on television, and I didn’t know her name. He won’t be deterred by false accusations from running for president. The Democratic machine of America brought forth a troubled woman. He asks the media not to draw his family into this. (they are calling his family members and stalking them.) He will vigorously defend his reputation and his integrity.

    CBS – asks him if he will take a lie detector test. He says yes, but there has to be a reason to do so. He agrees that presidential candidates should come under the microscope…but there should be truth and real facts and not hearsay.

    LA Times. In no way have I tried to minimize sexual harassment. I dealt with it immediately if I saw it occur. It was very serious.

    Karen Kreshauer (sp?)..he remembers that lady and she is the one that filed a complaint and it was found to be baseless. She could not find anyone to collaborate her story. She signed an agreement with the National Restaurant Association.

    Where are these accusations coming from? Some people don’t want Herman Cain to run as president. The machine to keep the businessman out of the White House will continue to try to slander him and stop him.

    There are coincidences to suggest that some people are behind this.

    • I wish he would have been briefed that they have a photo of him with her at the Tea Party, but it doesn’t sound as if she was introduced to him or that he remembers her. I’m sure a candidate meets hundreds of thousands of people. And her photo doesn’t look much like the person we see on TV now. Herman says he’d take a lie detector test! Let’s see Bialek do it, too!

  33. My feeling is, is that just because he talked to her, doesn’t mean that he knew or remembered her from before. That’s all I think. I’m also sure that he talks to many, many people.

    Here’s something to think about also. Our great-uncle, he’s deceased now and has been for many years, he was the sweetest person that you could ever know. I’d be in the grocery store with my husband, and he would walk up to me and grab me and hug me like crazy. Well, anyway, back then I did have some kind of looks. Don’t now. This was way back because he passed away in around 1986 or 1987, I think.

    I just loved that man to death, and it wasn’t just me he was that way with. He was like that to everyone and women, especially. Young or old too! But he was extremely happily married. He died in his sleep while he was watching TV around noontime, and his wife had a part-time job, came home and found him when she came home to fix him lunch. They had a great marriage, and his wife knew that he was a harmless flirt and thought nothing of it.

    That man could never really meet a stranger at all. He loved everyone, and would be such a harmless flirt. In today’s terms, shows how sick it is now, I’m sure that some stupid women would think that he was being sexual with them. He wasn’t. He would just hug the women, and tell them how pretty they are. My daddy (passed away when I was 18) was similar to that. He would go out of his way to tell people how pretty they look, or to hug someone. My how have the times changed!

    My husband nor I had thought anything wrong about what my husband’s great-uncle did. He knew he was like that, and it was harmless.

    So if some women possibly take Cain wrong, well, that’s the way people used to be. They showed kindness to others, and they were not afraid to show it either.

    • I’ve known a lot of men like your great-uncle. Especially older men, but Cain’s not THAT old. Still, from a different culture, surely. I think it’s likely that he poses for photos with hundreds of people every day. She ran up there and hugged him. Actually, if you look at that photo and the ones from yesterday and today, it looks like a different person. Of course, she was professionally dolled up for her presser. But look at her brows and hairline. She looks fatter today, too. IS it truly the same woman? I got the photo from the Sun article, but they don’t say who took the photo. And didn’t identify the other guys in the photo. How do we know for sure it’s her? Yesterday, all the Tea Partiers were saying they didn’t recognize her or know she was there. Well, she was hanging with the radio people. Basically, the media. NOT with the Tea Partiers. I still think it was a well- and long-planned set up.

      • Well, my dad was 65 when he died, and I was 18, but he was always like that. He grew up knowing that you can hug others, male or female, but it was not sexual. He just showed kindness to others like his mother did. He grew up with a Methodist minister as a dad, who was also a schoolteacher. As a matter of fact, he got something from the State of Texas as a Servant of the State of Texas. Well, after his death, he was recognized as that by congress.

        But it was my dad’s mother, my grandma, that was the very loving person and who loved others with a passion. Sad to say that I didn’t get to know her. She was burned very badly about a year after I was born taking care of her husband and an oxygen tank. Well, she caught on fire, lived almost a year in a hospital.

        I wish that I had known her because my mom’s family and dad’s family say that she was the most loving person in the world, would give the clothes off her back to help people who had none. She was a teacher also in early life, and that’s where she met my granddad, who I never got to know either.

        And my dad didn’t care of the “funny boy” stuff as he put it. You know what I mean. Even back in ’71 when he passed away, there weren’t that many “funny boys” coming out then. Even the so-called hippies weren’t discussing that much at all.

  34. The other day, I told you how Barry didn’t make the TRADITIONAL call to the winning team in the World Series–the Cardinals–and I suggested maybe because La Russa and Pujols attended a Glenn Beck rally and La Russa praised the Tea Party. Well, after it was PUBLICIZED that he didn’t call them, he up and made a PRIVATE call to just La Russa. Said he’d see the team in person when they come to the WH. How does he KNOW they’ll show up? If I were they, after a long-belated phone call (how sincerely did he feel his congratulations?), I’d snub him and stay home.

  35. http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/4217/#comment-19671
    Leo Donofrio is taking an unusual tack, but it will be interesting and educational to see him swat down the obots (sorry, Leo, on our blog, we rule, so we call it like we see it!) from Politijab, et al. They will not stand up against his brilliant mind. I, too, pray to Almighty God that Leo is wrong in his prediction. Vaya con Dios, Leo. God bless America.

    • I’m not happy about what Leo is doing, but that’s his business. I think sometimes from knowing him in the past in a different place, that he’s many times becomes a fence-sitter, then goes off the deep end for a time. Now is not the time to go off the deep end like he does. He does have a brilliant mind, though, just needs to learn focus.

    • Miri,

      If memory serves me correctly from reading his comment the other day, he won’t post anything unless people call BO “president.” Well, forget that. BO is not a president. He’s something, but we don’t know if he’s a true president.

      And for Leo to say something like that extremely offends me. I would never call him president. If by accident, maybe because of copying and pasting something. I usually just call him either Barky of BO. It’s not that I hate him. I don’t. I just can’t get it into my mind yet that he’s a bona fide president.

      • Hi KC. I’ve seen you bring this up a couple of times re; Leo’s comment on addressing Obama “President Obama”. So I went looking for the comment at Leo’s blog. I myself can “somewhat” understand from where Leo’s coming from…I had to read it a second time, then “got it” Posting it here:

        Snipped ~

        ZERO TOLERANCE is now the RULE OF LAW.

        You may NOT use the terms, “Obot”, or “birther”… or anything else derogatory. You will refer to Obama as President Obama, or Barack Obama, or even Obama… nothing else.
        Unlike many who support my research, I accept that Barack Obama is President right now. And until such time as our Constitutional separation of powers may allow for a determination that he is not eligible, I will respect his authority as POTUS. To do otherwise would work irreversible harm to the Constitution.
        Enemies of the Constitution do not care how it is destroyed, only that it is destroyed. Those who would disrespect the separation of powers in order to remove the current POTUS are themselves enemies of the Constitution. It does not matter whether people believe the Constitution is being violated now by Obama holding the office of POTUS. If you violate the Constitution in trying to remedy your complaint, you are no better than anyone else who has violated the Document.
        So please act as if you are in Court and your opposition deserves respect and lack of respect will get you hit with contempt by the Judge. NO EXCEPTIONS.

        • “You will refer to Obama as President Obama, or Barack Obama, or even Obama… nothing else.”

          Well, I did miss that part. But I don’t miss anything else on it. BO insults the US Constitution. Like I say, I don’t hate the man. I do think that he’s a usurper, a traitor and a crook. What I think is that he’s not much better than a used car salesman, maybe not that good. And he needs to be removed from the WH.

          I will support the Veterans Defenders group because they have hopes to peacefully do what they’re going, but of course, as is well known with BO, he leaves the country at what is an opportune time for him to do so.

    • Do you think Dr. Con’s bots will participate? The Conman has gone after Mario Apuzzo when Mario went to their blog and, of course, they ridiculed him. I doubt the Conspiracy group can stand up to Leo’s arguments. Mainly because they have been parrots and just repeated the same arguments over and over. Their was no thinking or researching done. Someone was feeding them the information.

      I think there is a reason for Leo to take the opposition’s side. Perhaps he is practicing for a lawsuit he is planning when and if the worst occurs.

      I don’t care if Leo says he wants the Usurper given respect…in my world he doesn’t deserve any, and to call him president would make me a hypocrite in my own soul. TWAP, usurper, conman, and fraud are words that still are appropriate adjectives describing him. Leo did say people could refer to him as plain Obama, but not Barfy, Barky, or BO, etc.

      This is our “court” and we certainly don’t disrespect the Constitution, quite the opposite. I sure do take umbrage against those who have sullied it like the TWAP and the complicit Marxists have done.

  36. I’m sorry, you guys, I didn’t mean to carry on. Once I start talking about them, I miss my dad and then not knowing my grandparents. So sorry, please understand. They did help the State of Texas gain reading abilities because they were all over the place teaching in their time against illiteracy. It was a huge thing back in their time, and they had many, many kids, then gave up a whole lot of money to do that and sacrificed. Speaks a lot about our ancestors, whoever they were, in the things that they did to make positive changes in lives.

    • You don’t have anything to apologize for, KC. It’s nice to hear about good things and good people for a change. They sound like wonderful, inspirational people whom you should be proud of. I miss my parents and grandparents, too, so I know where you’re coming from.

  37. After Fannie and Freddie just Handed Out $13 Million in Bonuses to Management now comes this – Fannie Mae taps another $7.8 billion federal aid , $112.6 billion in bailout funds from the Treasury Department since 2008.

    Fannie Mae taps $7.8 billion from Treasury, loss widens
    WASHINGTON | Tue Nov 8, 2011 6:42pm EST

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Fannie Mae, the biggest source of money for U.S. home loans, on Tuesday said it needed a further $7.8 billion in federal aid to stay afloat as a shaky housing market widened its third-quarter loss to $5.1 billion.

    Fannie Mae also attributed the deeper cash drain to losses on derivatives that are used to hedge the firm’s exposure to swings in interest rates and expenses related to home loans made prior to the 2008 financial collapse. In the year-earlier quarter it had a loss of a $1.3 billion.

    Fannie Mae, seized by the government in 2008, has drawn $112.6 billion in bailout funds from the Treasury Department since 2008 and has paid $17.2 billion to the government in the form of dividends.

    “Fannie Mae is working to reduce losses on our legacy book and limit taxpayer exposure,” Susan McFarland, the company’s executive vice president and chief financial officer, said in a statement.

    The government-owned company and its smaller rival Freddie Mac were taken over in the financial crisis as losses on subprime mortgages threatened insolvency. Given the crucial role the two play in U.S. housing finance, owning or guaranteeing about half of all mortgages, the government has pledged unlimited funds to keep the firms afloat through the end of 2012. Combined, they have cost taxpayers around $169 billion.

    Cont’s @ Link ~

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s