Iranian Flotilla to Sail Along US Coast – Provocation?

©  Bridgette WTPOTUS 2011

 Intention or Bluff?

 How and When Will Obama Respond…

Shall We Count the Days?


Iranian Navy Destroyer "Jamaran" Ebrahim Nourozi/AFP/Getty Images


Reports today from Russia state that  Iran’s navy is planning to send a “flotilla” to  patrol our eastern coast shortly.  [Anyone know how many ships comprise a flotilla?]   Are their navy destroyers  arranging a sight-seeing tour or do they want to size-up our naval carriers  that protect our nation?   Do they want to contact our naval submarines that also travel our shore lines?  What is their intent?  Should we be concerned?   According to a CNN report, the White House is not concerned and the Department of Defense says, ‘It’s no big deal.”  As we have learned over the last three years, whatever this administration  says, expect the opposite.

If you recall, in August, 2009,  we had provocative visits by  two nuclear-powered Russian attack submarines that patrolled our eastern coast for several days, but at least we were told that the military was monitoring their activities.    Whether they are still in the area or have departed our international shores, I don’t know.  I hope they went south to visit our neighbors in Cuba or moved further south to the South American coast.  Here’s hoping the Russians don’t have plans to meet up with their Iranian friends off our coast line.    (Now, the arrival of  those Russian ships cruising along our shoreline did freak me out).

I don’t like blustering by despots because we never know when their cries of wolf will become reality.   Middle Easterners have a different mind-set than we do.  They’ve been brought up to believe if they end up in their heaven by following their Islamic jihadic cause  they’ll be visited by multitudes of vestal virgins upon arrival.  So they are all for offing one or a dozen western infidels for the chance to get their mighty nifty reward.   If you haven’t noticed, it seems they are ramping up their stairways to heaven and  forcing their ideology on everyone.  Maybe like their Al Queda brothers the Iranians are  willing to make aggressive moves on the western world and on our territory.

So my fellow Americans, here is the story from RT which I believe is a Russian newspaper’s website.   This is an alert and not a panic button …yet.   We just want to remain informed because we know that Iran’s  President Ahmadinejad hasn’t unclenched his fist or given a high-five salute to our weak leader.    In fact, it was only a week ago that he spoke to the UN General Assembly  in New York City and raked our people, our nation’s policies, and our government over the coals.   That’s nothing new, but he is consistent.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Source: Reuters

In reality, he’s had a rough week.   He was  given a warning  by Al Queda to stop denying 9-11, there were hundreds of protesters outside the UN yelling for him to go home, and then  multiple countries walked out on his speech.  By sending a flotilla to the US he could be retaliating for people dismissing and ignoring his anti-American diatribe.   Then again, perhaps we didn’t praise him enough for releasing those two leftist anti- American activists (spies) from prison.   Do you think he  suffers from the Napoleonic syndrome that so many short men do?   Unlike his friend Hugo Chavez, Ahmadinejad  didn’t smell sulfur when he took the stage at the UN.   But after his fiery speech perhaps he  left a distinct odor as he stepped away from the podium.  Only the speaker after him would be able to report.

Iran to Patrol US East Coast
28 September, 2011, 22:12

Sick of the American navy’s ongoing presence in the Persian Gulf, an official with the military of Iran announced this week that they will be sending ships over to be stationed off the coast of the United States.

In other words, Iran thinks that what’s good for the goose is good for the colossal, militaristic gander.

A statement from Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyar to the official Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) this week reads,

“Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to American marine borders,”

The IRNA adds that Sayyar, the commander of the entire Navy of Iran, will call for “the help of our sailors who follow the concept of the supreme jurisprudence”  to send a flotilla towards the Atlantic coast of the United States.

On the same day as Sayyar’s statement, Iran Defense Minister Gen. Ahmad Vahidi also revealed to the media that the navy has another tactic under its sleeve:  the country is beginning production of cruise missiles made for sea-based targets that could even counter massive warships, reports The Associated Press.   The AP says that Vahidi’s comments suggest that the weaponry could be used to combat American ships anchored in the Persian Gulf, but with a fleet setting sail towards the US, could a new cold war embark between the two nations?

The Department of Defense doesn’t think it’s a big deal.

Pentagon Spokesman Capt. John Kirby released a statement in response to Iran’s plans and says, “We’ve been pushing freedom of the seas for years and the Iranian navy can go wherever it wants.” Given those sentiments, it seems likely that the United States will continue to sail through the Persian Gulf, even if Iran is ready to respond to that presence.

For those keeping track, this marks at least the second time in a week that Iran has called out America as an “arrogant power.”  Those were the words that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad used last week when he called out the US for the military’s ongoing appearance in seemingly all ends of the globe.

Ahmadinejad said to the United Nations’ General Assembly last week,

“Do these arrogant powers really have the competence and ability to run or govern the world? Is it acceptable that they call themselves the sole defender of freedom, democracy, and human rights, while they militarily attack and occupy other countries?”

In the meantime, it looks as if Iran will send ships elsewhere, as well.  State-run Press TV suggests that the country will also be deploying a new fleet into the Gulf of Arden to protect the nation’s ships from pirate attacks.


Please say a prayer for the Christian pastor that is to be executed in Iran because he won’t renounce his religion and accept Islam.   Where are all of those Lefties that helped to free the American activists that were imprisoned? Why are they silent?  Is this man’s life not important?


33 responses to “Iranian Flotilla to Sail Along US Coast – Provocation?

  1. Iranian Regime Says It Will Move Ships Into Atlantic Off US Coast
    September 28, 2011

    The commander of the Iranian navy announced the regime plans to move vessels into the Atlantic Ocean to start a naval buildup near the US border.

    Fars News reported: Iranian Navy Commander Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari announced that the country plans to move vessels into the Atlantic Ocean to start a naval buildup “near maritime borders of the United States”. “Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders, we will also have a powerful presence close to the American marine borders,” Sayyari said. Speaking at a ceremony marking the 31st anniversary of the start of the 1980-1988 war with Iraq, Sayyari gave no details of when such a deployment could happen or the number or type of vessels to be used.

    The remarks come as another high-ranking Iranian military official rejected a recent US request to establish a “red phone” link between the countries in the Persian Gulf. “We would establish direct contact with the United States if we would ever go to the Gulf of Mexico,” Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Navy Ali Fadavi said. He rejected the US demand, and explained, “In the view of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the presence of the US in the Persian Gulf is illegitimate and makes no sense.”

  2. You got the diagnosis correct, Bridgette: Little Man Syndrome! The thing is, a guy can have it and still be taller than most. Just look at Barry. Maybe it’s a little man mindset.

    “As we have learned over the last three years, whatever this administration says, expect the opposite.” Yep, yep, yep. Good rule of thumb to determine what’s up in the Obamanation.

    As for I’m-a-nutjob: One clown thumbing his nose at another. Clowns to the left of us; jokers to the right. Here we are, stuck in the middle again. 🙂

    When the Pentagon’s John Kirby said, “We’ve been pushing freedom of the seas for years and the Iranian navy can go wherever it wants,” I hope he wasn’t talking about the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    Accession to the convention would result in a dangerous and irreversible loss of American sovereignty. It would require the U.S. Treasury to transfer tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars to an unaccountable international organization in Jamaica, which in turn is empowered to redistribute those American dollars to countries with interests that are inimical to the U.S. The convention’s mandatory dispute mechanisms will result ultimately in troublesome and costly legal judgments if the United States is deemed to have “violated” the convention-most likely when the United States has acted in its own best interests. … The Navy is strongly in favor of U.S. accession to UNCLOS. It asserts that U.S. membership in the convention is essential to guaranteeing the Navy’s navigational rights and freedoms. However, the Navy’s vocal and consistent support for UNCLOS is extremely narrow, based largely on the navigational rights and freedoms contained within the convention-its least controversial provisions. That said, for more than 200 years before UNCLOS came into existence in 1982 and during the almost 30 years since then, the United States has successfully preserved and protected its maritime interests regardless of the fact that it has not acceded to the convention.”

    Interesting that the Navy is for something that Pres. Reagan (and apparently the Senate) sees as a threat to our sovereignty.

    I wonder if that’s another reason for the provocation? To try to force the US to accede to that treaty. After all, I’m-a-nutjob was just AT the UN and they all want us to submit to the UN’s plans. (Even, or especially, BARRY!) If this treaty means yet another way to redistribut our wealth to other nations, then I can totally see the asshats at the UN (and Barry) conspiring with Iran to pull this kind of a stunt. Russia, too.

    Oh, should we congratulate Vlad on being reelected to the Russian presidency? Election not yet held, but of course results already known and Vlad will be in power through 2020, iirc. What a country!

  3. You know what else is curious? If obots come to attack on THIS post, you almost have to believe that Barry’s peeps are somehow involved in yet another act of Kabuki Theater. Just sayin’.

    If not an obot, then please pay attention to the comment rules. Ad hominem attacks and cursing not kosher here.

  4. Was it presented at the UN this past week? By chance, I just read something about the Law of the Sea treaty and see that you wrote about it. When I read it I thought it was about Obama’s wanting to limit and control fishing in all lakes, etc. that was talked about last year. It is an informative article, but I don’t know anything about the organization that wrote it so don’t know if the information can be trusted.

    U.S. Leaders Support Law of the Sea Treaty
    Sept. 29, 2011 updated 38 minutes ago. snips

    Re Law of the Sea, The Heritage Foundation does not support it.It is supported by a wide array of interest groups, including the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard, international environmental groups, and the mining, fishing, shipping, and telecommunications industries.” This has been on the table since 1982 and still hasn’t passed.

    The United States, the country with the largest exclusive economic zone, may ratify the Law of the Sea treaty. Among many measures, it would set guidelines for U.S. oil companies that seek to mine the Arctic Ocean. Newly appointed U.S. leadership is promising to join a longstanding international agreement that oversees ocean resource and pollution disputes.

    U.S. Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush supported the treaty during their tenures, but conservative members of Congress repeatedly blocked its ratification due to concerns that it would limit commerce and allow international bodies to wield greater control over U.S. interests.

    • Don’t know if it was presented again. We talked about it here:
      and here:

      Proving there’s no such thing as coincidence, an op-ed published today:
      The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST)—signed by the U.S. in 1994 but never ratified by the Senate—is showing some signs of life on Capitol Hill, even as new circumstances make it less attractive than ever. With China emerging as a major power, ratifying the treaty now would encourage Sino-American strife, constrain U.S. naval activities, and do nothing to resolve China’s expansive maritime territorial claims.

      At issue is China’s intensified effort to keep America’s military out of its “Exclusive Economic Zone,” a LOST invention that affords coastal states control over economic activity in areas beyond their sovereign, 12-mile territorial seas out to 200 miles. Properly read, LOST recognizes exclusive economic zones as international waters, but China is exploiting the treaty’s ambiguities to declare “no go” zones in regions where centuries of state practice clearly permit unrestricted maritime activity.

      Take the issues of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, both by air and sea. LOST is silent on these subjects in the exclusive zones, so China claims it can regulate (meaning effectively prohibit) all such activity. Beijing also brazenly claims—exploiting Western green sensibilities—that U.S. naval vessels pollute China’s exclusive zone, pollution being an activity the treaty permits coastal states to regulate out to 24 miles.

      China wants to deny American access to its nearby waters so it can have its way with its neighbors. Beijing is building a network of “anti-access” and “area denial” weapons such as integrated air defenses, submarines, land-based ballistic and cruise missiles, and cyber and anti-satellite systems designed to make it exceedingly hazardous for American ships and aircraft to traverse China’s exclusive zone or peripheral seas.

      If the Senate ratifies the treaty, we would become subject to its dispute-resolution mechanisms and ambiguities. Right now, since we are the world’s major naval power, our conduct dominates state practice and hence customary international law—to our decided advantage.

      This dispute is not really about law. China simply does not want the U.S. military to gather intelligence near its shores. And other nations quietly support China’s position, including Russia, Iran, Brazil and India. Given China’s incessant incursions into the exclusive zones of other Asian nations such as Vietnam, the Philippines and Japan, these states may seek to restrict international maritime activities in their exclusive zones as well, further complicating U.S. efforts.” (I wish Bolton WOULD run for POTUS.)

      • Here’s another from 4 hours ago, connecting the Law of the Sea to Palestinian request for statehood at the UN:

        “Participation in UN Institutions
        One of the most important achievements expected to result from the UN bid, from the Palestinians’ perspective, is the eligibility to participate in UN institutions, which will grant them the right to take legal action against Israel and to demand the UN’s intervention in resolving conflicts with it. Palestinian legal expert Mu’taz Kfeisha wrote: “After the declaration of statehood, Palestine will be able to use the internationally-sanctioned legal mechanisms in persuading Israel to accept peace and stop its ongoing crimes against the Palestinian people, for example, [the mechanism of] the International Criminal Court, INTERPOL and its associated police forces, the International Court [of Justice], the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body.”[18] Jihad Harb wrote that the advantages of appealing to the UN were “internationalizing the Palestinian cause, and [gaining] the option of working in the UN institutions and frameworks, and [utilizing] its mechanisms to end the occupation.””

        • And another: Concerns the Arctic, Russia, and Alaska.

          “Russia, already kingpin of the world’s icebreaker fleet, plans nine new ships by 2020. They will discount tariffs on icebreaker escort so shippers find the Northern Sea Route, with distance savings up to 40 percent, more competitive. And under Law of the Sea, Russia’s claim to new extended continental shelf resources could give Russia greater control of Arctic shipping.

          Alaska’s Arctic agenda also focuses on access, development of resources onshore and off, safety in shipping and drilling, and getting new icebreakers to protect us and our shores. We respect the timeless use of this region by our First Alaskans, and will protect the wildlife resources we all enjoy and many depend on. We’re still waiting for Senate approval of Law of the Sea so America can make its own Arctic claim.

          While the Russians are awake to the opportunities of the Arctic, we’re still trying to wake up Washington. And sitting there, listening to Russian leaders, I saw we’ve got a tougher time than our counterparts in the Russian Arctic, where the nation — and the national government — understands the opportunities and the risks.

          To counter the risks, next month Alaska officials will push to implement the Arctic Search and Rescue agreement signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at May’s Arctic Council Ministerial. Alaska National Guard assets, with helicopters and rescue teams deployed by the North Slope Borough, support the under-equipped and under-capitalized Coast Guard in keeping the safety mission we’ve promised the world in the American Arctic.”

          I wonder what Sarah Palin thinks about this treaty?

          Cuba is also involved, with the Arab media watching the story:

          • It seems to be designed to redistribute our wealth and resources, to keep us from developing our own resources, to keep us energy DEPENDENT, and to make us SUBJECT to the UN. The Senate hasn’t ratified this for a REASON. Our sovereignty is of UTMOST importance in this war against the NWO. Of course, Barry and the Dems will double down, trying to ram through as much as they can to cripple US sovereignty BEFORE the Rushbo-predicted blowout of 2012.

      • I’ll believe what John Bolton says! He laid it out in an understandable way. I think we should keep our advantage. Can you foresee the future of fish disputes…and the claim that the fish was in “my” water first? China already wants to control their shoreline and airspace so they want all the water too…no spying on them is allowed.

        How about him as Secretary of State! I think he knows how the games are played.

        • I loved him when he’d go to the UN, under GWB, and give them hell. He does know all the games they play, which is why we need him back. Greta Van Susteran always has him on her show and asks if he’s running. I don’t think I ever heard a final answer from him. Like Sarah. And Christie. I’m waiting from Trump! Surely we haven’t heard the last of him.

          China makes SO MUCH money off fishing now. Have you ever sourced the fish at the supermarket? If I see China, I throw it back! Just imagine the pollution around their country, for one thing. Yuk. Poisons already found in products from there that have killed children. Who needs it? I won’t even buy their canned mushrooms. Locally sourced!

  5. Experts dismiss Iran’s threat to deploy ships near U.S. waters as “bombastic rhetoric”
    Sept. 29 Snips

    Someone overreached a bit in the saber-rattling. The cost, logistics, and the capability that would be required are simply too much. That said, analysts did note that Iran’s chances, if it were that determined to pull off such a stunt, would improve with a little help from its friends — perhaps Venezuela.

    (CNN) In response, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that “we don’t take these statements seriously, given that they do not reflect at all Iran’s naval capabilities.” Pentagon spokesman George Little echoed Carney’s point, saying Iran has the right to send vessels into international waters, but “whether they can truly project naval power beyond the region is another question.” “I wouldn’t read too much into what came out of Iran,” Little said, adding: “I think what is said and what is actually done can be two different things.” “Iran doesn’t have the capability to come within close proximity to (the United States) to conduct hostile activities. Even if (Iran) launched missiles, we would sink their ships immediately.”

    Iran lacks battleships or aircraft carriers. Its forces are capable of patrolling the Persian Gulf and sailing a short distance in the Indian Ocean, Herrmann said, but keeping ships stationed near the United States, so far from Iran, would be too expensive for the government. “They would need a place to resupply, refuel, restock crews with food and water. They couldn’t afford that unless they got help,” Herrmann said. “I would imagine they could get help from somewhere in South America, maybe Venezuela.”

    Venezuela and Iran are allied by their anti-U.S. sentiments.

  6. Two Serious Warnings,

    First, Canada Free Press:

    A dangerous new chapter is being written in American history that, if successful, is destined to impact the history of the West. It’s called ‘Re-Election by Suspended Election Revolution’
    Warning: The threat of suspended elections is real
    Author – Judi McLeod Thursday, September 29, 2011

    With absolutely no proof of any kind of who he really is, Barack Obama made it to the Oval Office in 2008. There was no media vetting of the largely absentee senator from Illinois, who even back then had the temerity to compare himself to Abraham Lincoln. All anyone ever had to go on was an autobiographical book suspected of being ghost-written by an unrepentant domestic terrorist. We all know how it goes with politicians and autobiographical books.

    When Nancy Pelosi writes hers she will claim she trumps Mother Teresa, the Calcutta saint, not the one married to John Kerry.

    If Harry Reid ever gets around to it, writing his, wine will turn to vinegar overnight.

    You can claim to be anyone you want in a book, and that’s what Barry Soetoro did.

    The point is that Barry Soetoro took the name Barack Hussein Obama, got himself elected and immediately began pushing the country so many look up to, right up to the precipice and nobody—nobody—has been able to stop him.

    Now when we have a narcissistic Obama plunging in the polls, a democrat governor in North Carolina is pushing the envelope for suspending elections and covering up a notion she dropped a bombshell by claiming she was only using hyperbole to make a point for a Rotary Club.

    If the election were held tomorrow, Obama would go down in a landslide strikingly more humiliating than the shellacking he and his party got—and never got over—in the midterms.

    But the 2012 election is more than a year away, and the man who made it all the way to the most powerful office on earth sans identity documents has all the booty, and the absolute power it brings, at his command.

    This is Obama’s well-stocked position at a time when only suspended elections would guarantee his re-election.

    North Carolina Gov. Bev Perdue was not joking when she spoke about suspending elections. Nor did she pick the idea out of thin air. Perdue was giving the suspend-congressional-elections idea its first oxygen for her hell-bent-for-leather boss.

    It is crucial to not let this day go down without remembering what Perdue said.

    Don’t let the state-controlled mainstream media lure you back to sleep by saying if there is no election, then why is Obama so diligently campaigning.

    Obama is not campaigning. He is preparing for Stage Two of the Total Transformation of America, using taxpayer money to prepare his Internet-identified “troops” for the coming Marxist Revolution.

    He must not be allowed to get away with it. Patriots should now be doing everything legal to stop him in his tracks.

    Nothing is impossible when all the control is held by a tyrant.

    Obama and his masters already pulled the biggest scam on any country in modern times by making it to the White House without legitimate I.D.

    A dangerous new chapter is being written in American history that, if successful, is destined to impact the history of the West. It’s called ‘Re-Election by Suspended Election Revolution’.
    Patriots who want their grandchildren to grow up in a Marxist-free America should start the counter revolution called the ‘Revolution for an Obama-free America’ and they should start it “like yesterday”.

    Then LC on Fox

    When this blog exclusively exposed that what was behind the English hacking scandal was insiders punishing Rupert Murdoch for his backing of B. Hussein Obama in 2008, and then followed up with the exclusive that Eric Holder with Obama were blackmailing Rupert Murdoch aka FOX News to silence them on what those frauds knew about Obama………..

    We now follow up with the nail in the coffin exclusive which tracks directly back into why FOX and Roger Ailes went on the leash for Barack Hussein Obama.

    You must understand the connections FOX had when Newt Gingrich created it as a Mockingbird asset of the right to offset the avalanche of leftist main stream media. Roger Ailes was right out of Ronald Reagan’s and Bill Casey of CIA’s war room. The entire operations like Casey’s ABC changeling which promoted Limbaugh and now Mark Levin, are backed by the black operations money flow which filters from the corporate complex directly back into the media propaganda complex.
    Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, The View are all the same left media whores……….same funding just different source for the control over the masses to keep them from burning America down in revolution.

    Ailes was the perfect nightmare to liberals, but he built with Dan Cooper who helped build FOX, (Cooper was fired in 1996) an electronic surveillance station of all Americans, called the BRAIN ROOM.
    This was a high tech plugged in intelligence gathering operation, and if you will recall this blog exclusively mentioning how the Limbaugh scripted program works in every caller there is data mined while on hold…… are starting to comprehend that Rush Limbaugh is not that bright in spotting frauds, because it is easy to spot a fraud whose number traces back to a Barack Obama donor.

    The Brain Room story was funded by George Soros in 2008 for the Rothschilds to put FOX and Murdoch on a leash. The writer for Media Matters was David Brock………you now start to see the Marxist counter intelligence operation against Murdoch and why the old man suddenly became enamoured with Obama and set up the infamous bitch slap meeting, between Ailes and Obama, where Obama told Ailes off and Roger went on the leash.

    You can see this blackmail yet in the misogyny of Chris Wallace to the girly hysteria Shep Smith drools about in the Birther issue.
    Ann Coulter is dirty as hell for her dripping over Obama and now going whole Crispy Cream for the New Jersey Governor who looks like Jimmy Hoffa.

    What is “different” is Murdoch in the British hacking, has had MI6 spin it, that it was Murdoch hiring cops to tap phone lines……………I can tell you that police do not tap Prince Charles phones lines. What Murdoch had in London was MI6 configured intelligence just like Ailes was running at FOX in the Brain Room. That is how they got their news, how they leveraged people to do stories and is who FOX kept tabs on the naughty and nice crowd.

    You need to be reminded of when Obama “remodeled the White House” in early 2009, that this blog broke the story that Karl Rove had bugged the White House. Someone squealed on Rove from the inside or Obama had Rove’s puffy lips tapped, and Rove not keeping his mouth shut let Obama know he was being listened to.
    So Obama pulled out the bugs, but not before big mouth Rush Limbaugh parroted Rove’s insider information on Obama setting up the Birther issue to smear the GOP.

    When Axelrod, Plouffe, Jarrett and Obama heard that, they knew where in the hell the leak came from, was inside the White House walls, because they were the only one’s in the meeting about this criminal fraud in the Hawaiian birth abstract.

    You really want to know why the Limbaugh leaners are so kiss ass on Obama? They all are fed from the same system in part by the spy network, and that is the cut Obama and Holder have over all of these people.
    When I make mention of things World Net Daily knows and how Obama knew them before Joseph Farah hung up the Lawrence Sinclair phone……….it is the same Obama spying network in his own Brain Room, which has been operational with the Brown Recluse from the start of this.

    Geez Louise children, put this together…………same companies which make spyware are the same people who work for the spooks, who have political affiliations and all these select few have to do is set up their own Brain Room, and tap the typical public information “as their cover” and piggyback directly into the NSA superstructure in shadow doors left open, exactly as I exclusively told you the Brown Recluse was up to in the White House.

    I have told you previously that blackmail only works of the secret stays secret. It is more valuable on both sides of the Atlantic for Murdoch to be blackmailed into silence and FOX on the left side of the Atlantic is on the Obama leash doing Obama propaganda.
    Sure Obama could take down FOX, but all that would do is gut the Ailes bunch and a new real right wing who were not dirty would be free to nail Obama to the wall on his being a fraud.

    Now you know why this bunch blackballed Jerome Corsi………the orders came directly from Barack Obama.

    Why in the hell do you think Obama sits in his second floor tower room watching FOX?

    Hell no the Insider Deep Tutu hasn’t got this figured out yet. He thinks it is vanity and Ulsterman never comprehended it has to do with Obama sitting their enjoying every second in knowing FOX is working for him AS HIS CABLE NETWORK.
    Obama is a sociopath and a narcissist. He gets off on torture and that is why he focuses on it. Why he does what he does to bin Laden and Khadaffi in front of the kids. Why he watches FOX, because he knows he is torturing those bastards and making them twist in the wind……..and Obama is in control, and Birdy loves being in control.

    Now you know the score in this in Barack Obama is proven to be blackmailing FOX, Murdoch, Ailes and all your favorite Limbaugh leaners. I have hinted at this enough, but an astute gal named Jen Dunnbar got me thinking on this a few hours ago and now you are thinking about it all.

    This corporate spying goes on all over. Problem is Murdoch let the Rothschilds in London into this business and in their network caught Murdoch already in 2007 and by 2008, they had Murdoch on the leash with Obama pissing on Ailes marking territory.

    It should all add up for you children now, in one of thee most explosive stories beyond Watergate in what Obama has been up to, how his Europeans used this to keep Ailes and FOX mouth’s shut and how this all became one more big media wing directly under control of the New World Order in Europe.

    Hell it got so bad that Ailes was threatening Sarah Palin to keep her mouth shut in that BLOOD LIBEL statement Sarah was spot on about.

    The reason FOX hired Sarah Palin, is they are spying on her for Barack Hussein Obama.

    Governor Palin you had better get this figured out that your smear leakers are not just creepy liberal writers, Karl puffy lips Rove, but FOX is just like Obama tracking your cell phone and all your other electronic communications.
    That is how they set up the Giffords smear.

    That was probably too much to reveal, but then I’m only the typist here.

    agtG 294YY

    “I made the connections. Ailes knew I had given Brock the interview. Certainly Brock didn’t tell him. Of course. Fox News had gotten Brock’s telephone records from the phone company, and my phone number was on the list. Deep in the bowels of 1211 Avenue of the Americas, News Corporation’s New York headquarters, was what Roger called the Brain Room. Most people thought it was simply the research department of Fox News. But unlike virtually everybody else, because I had to design and build the Brain Room, I knew it also housed a counterintelligence and black ops office. So accessing phone records was easy pie.”

    Dan Cooper
    Fired FOX News founder

  7. For some background:
    “According to former Fox News executive Dan Cooper, whose gripes with his former employer run quite deep after being fired in 1996, Fox News chief Roger Ailes allegedly had him design the so-called “Brain Room” to facilitate counter-intelligence efforts and other “black ops.”

    In a lengthy 2008 diatribe said to have doubled as a book pitch, Cooper claimed his own phone records had been hacked by Fox News employees, who he says used them to pinpoint him as a source used by David Brock, who founded liberal watchdog group Media Matters. … That wasn’t the last time word of Ailes’s “Brain Room” surfaced: in a recent piece for Rolling Stone, journalist Tim Dickenson discusses Cooper’s allegations too, focusing on the man Ailes allegedly picked to run the secretive office.

    “Befitting his siege mentality, Ailes also housed his newsroom in a bunker,” Dickenson wrote. “Reporters and producers at Fox News work in a vast, windowless expanse below street level, a gloomy space lined with video-editing suites along one wall and an endless cube farm along the other. In a separate facility on the same subterranean floor, Ailes created an in-house research unit – known at Fox News as the ‘brain room’ – that requires special security clearance to gain access. ‘The brain room is where Willie Horton comes from,’ says Cooper, who helped design its specs. ‘It’s where the evil resides.'”

    Sounds like your typical liberal attack on FOX News. Willie Horton? Please. We know where evil resides. David Brock? Look him up.

  8. Saw this in a comment at Citizen Wells, thought it may interest some at this site.

    I watched the video twice, and I am still a skeptic. As for that photo of Ann and Barry, I have seen that photo many times, and something about it makes me scream “photoshopp!” but I can’t tell you why, just a hunch.

    • What an interesting video, and analysis of the one photo of Ann. I captured some of those pictures of her from the video as screen shots and will look at them more closely. I was interested in her ears…because BHO’s stand out so much. Malcolm’s were close to his head and had a different shape. But the gal in the video seems to have ears that stick out. The girl looked so boyish, naive, and sweet standing there. I still don’t think BHO was born here…I go with that original database find that he was from New Guinea.

      As a group we started collecting these photos 3 years ago and have compared them. From the whole collection there are only a few that were untouched by a photo-shopper, and many we don’t think are even him or real relatives. After seeing so many, I can pick out the details now.

      The adopted sister probably held the answer, that he isn’t who he says he is. Unfortunately, Lia died before being able to correctly identify him or say she didn’t know who he was. She was the only one with “real” details of the person known as Barry.

  9. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Things that make you go hmmmmmm…..

    • i just saw this and i am wondering if there is something to this. you can always tell when you hit on something by the way your computer responds when you try to get to the site. I saw the video in the blog and it is compelling. i would love to revisit the SAD image comparisons started on this site…..very interesting indeed. This blog was the first to question the images of SAD.

      • dont know…i went back and looked at the old photos….everything is possible i suppose. all the photos out there are so strange, like they took a picture of her when she was thirty and put it with him when he was 18 months and then there is a picture of her with bho jr. when she looks 16 but he is three???? i just cant put the whole thing together because the photos that were put out there are strange looking that it makes you wonder what she really looked like at any one time.

        • Yes, we’ve been comparing photos of Stanley Ann for years. It does seem as if all the photos put out by either his campaign, his family (Maya), or her friends are photoshopped around the hairline, the nose, the mouth. Some look as if they split her face in two and then flipped half and put two of the same halves together to make one face. You can see this especially on the passport photos. There’s a line going down the middle.

          It sometimes looks as if they splice halves of two different faces together. You can see that especially on the lips where they don’t match them up exactly. They add long hair by putting that headband, to hide the hairline. In the photo where she’s sitting on the couch with Lolo, her hair might be a “fall” or even a veil. Hard to tell.

          That photo of her with Barry on the fence, there’s a lot more messed up with that photo than they pointed out. So long since I looked at these, I’d have to go back and find my notes.

          That person in the video–are you all convinced that ISN’T a boy? If it’s a girl, she’s very, very butch, if you know what I mean. Later photos of a chubby SAD in Indonesia, doing her anthropology work, look more like that “boyish girl” than the early ones. Perhaps by design, because if that’s she, then they may have figured it not necessary to photoshop the aged SAD’s photos, since age and weight gain disguised her well enough. But perhaps in the younger photos, she would have been more recognizable.

          However, they say in that article that Malcolm’s teen lover was present at his murder in 1965. First of all, wouldn’t that known lover have a name? It’s been said that it would not have gone down well with his followers if he had a WHITE girlfriend. Second, was he married then? Third, was SAD a TEEN in 1965? Fourth, where was SAD in 1965? Marrying Lolo, unless we discount EVERYTHING about him and their marriage. They’re hiding her early passport records, but do we believe they faked ALL those records from Lolo’s file?

          Is this Erik Rush? He’s a WND writer.

          Jury’s out!

  10. I’m going to post this here because at least it’s a Middle Eastern topic. Told ya! (Although who couldn’t see this one coming?)

    “The Obama administration told the Palestinian Authority it cannot significantly help advance a Palestinian state until after the 2012 presidential elections, a top PA official told WND.

    The official, however, said the U.S. will press for a Palestinian state quickly if President Obama is re-elected.

    “The main message we received from the U.S. is that nothing will happen in a serious way before the 2012 elections,” said the official.

    The PA official said Obama “will not accept the Palestinian request of a state at the (U.N.) Security Council and cannot help on the ground for now.”

    “We were told to wait for Obama’s reelection, and that before then nothing serious will happen for a state,” the official continued. “But after the reelection, the U.S. said the schedule will be short to reach a Palestinian state.”

    Obama’s policies toward Israel have been highlighted in local and national campaigns, with many Democrats fearing voters will oppose them due to the perception the president is anti-Israel.”

    Now where would ANYBODY get the idea that the president is anti-Israel? In this instance, I COMPLETELY believe what this Palestinian official said.

  11. Days before the execution…the White House finally says something!

    White House Condemns Possible Execution of Iranian Pastor
    September 29, 2011

    The White House condemned the conviction and possible death sentence for an Iranian pastor who refuses to renounce his Christian faith on Thursday, saying the execution would further demonstrate Iranian authorities “utter disregard” for religious freedom.

    Youcef Nadarkhani, 32, who maintains he has never been a Muslim as an adult, has Islamic ancestry and therefore must recant his faith in Jesus Christ, the 11th branch of Iran’s Gilan Provincial Court has ruled. Iran’s Supreme Court had ordered the trial court to determine whether Nadarkhani had been a Muslim prior to converting to Christianity.

    Attorney Mohammad Ali Dadkhah told The Associated Press on Thursday that his client has appeared before the appeals court over the past four days and expects a ruling by the end of next week. Dadkhah said he believes there’s a “95 percent chance” of acquittal for Nadarkhani.

    Dadkhah said neither Iranian law nor clerics have ever stipulated the death penalty as punishment for converting from Islam to Christianity.

    The judges in the case, according to the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ), demanded that Nadarkhani recant his Christian faith before submission of evidence. Though the judgment runs against current Iranian and international laws and is not codified in Iranian penal code, the judge stated that the court must uphold the decision of the 27th Branch of the Supreme Court in Qom.

    Even if the sentence is overturned, Jordan Sekulow, the executive director of the ACLJ, said the message is that it would be unlikely that Nadarkhani would be set free.

    Nadarkhani is the latest Christian cleric to be imprisoned in Iran for his religious beliefs. According to Elam Ministries, a United Kingdom-based organization that serves Christian churches in Iran, there was a significant increase in the number of Christians arrested solely for practicing their faith between June 2010 and January 2011. A total of 202 arrests occurred during that six-month period, including 33 people who remained in prison as of January, Elam reported.

    Elise Auerbach, an Iranian analyst for Amnesty International USA, told that an execution for apostasy has not been carried out in Iran since 1990. Nadarkhani’s sentence is a “clear violation of international law,” she said. “The key is to keep up the pressure and to publicize the story because it obviously outrages most people,” Auerbach said. “It’s part of the pattern of persecution based on religion in Iran.”

  12. Well it is either the guy goes, by impeachment or by election, or our nation dies, and not only our nation, but the concept of freedom held by the West dies also.

    I don’t post too much now.
    We have the massive evidence that despite any fact gathering,despite any totally awesome Court challenges, that no change will happen meaning there is no point proceeding along these lines.

    It is boring posting what sounds like Conspiracy theories. There is one over at that says our banks are overexposed by 240 trillion bucks in futures trades, more money than even exists.
    Hope it is not true.
    Oh goody we got Biny, we got al-laki

    We have the most dangerous usurper taking our country down,consigned us to ignominious defeat by withdrawal in Afghanistan and Iraq unwound our space program,
    ruined our economy, and destroyed our news networks, even rupert’s fox news.

    You cannot have missed the seismic shift that is occurring in fox news over the last two weeks.
    We are being killed.

    Are his handlers the Rooskys, Bilderberg, Illuminati, Rothschild’s or someone we even don’t know but was the reason Obama refused to surrender his blackberry?

    Who cares?

    If you have a murderer at your door, do you have to know his name before you defend yourselves?

    • This is not the time to give up or give in Dave! It is the opposite. We are all weary of the corruption that has been uncovered and that we are witnessing daily. We are going to have to rip the criminals and anti-Americans out at their roots, and everybody needs to stay involved. Take a breather and then come back reinvigorated.

  13. Thanks Bridgette

    I will stay in.

  14. The killer at the door:

    Obama’s illegal and Congressional bypassing behaviors
    Is Congress Refusing to Stop the Obama Syndicate Crimes?

    Author- Sher Zieve Monday, October 3, 2011

    With all of its pretense of sending open letters to Obama pleading with him to stop his illegal and Congressional bypassing behaviors, Congress patently refuses to stop Dictator-in-Chief Obama from destroying the United States of America and enslaving its people. The latest “plea” that prompted this column is the 26 September 2011 Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) begging letter to the US “dear leader.” In it, Grassley begins:

    “Dear Mr. President:

    “We write to express serious concern about your immigration policies and ask that you require the Department of Homeland Security to overturn recent directives regarding the increased use of prosecutorial discretion. We also request that the Administration halt any initiative, whether through regulation or otherwise, that circumvents Congress or aims to ensure that illegal immigrants are afforded every possibility to remain in this country.

    “After the release of the June 17th Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memorandum, which called for the increased use of prosecutorial discretion, several members of the Senate wrote to Assistant Secretary John Morton. While prosecutorial discretion is justifiable in certain cases, this initiative may result in an impermissible intrusion on Congress’s plenary authority over immigration law. Accordingly, we asked Assistant Secretary Morton to rescind the memorandum outlining ICE’s prosecutorial discretion policies. That request has been ignored.

    “We are also concerned that the initiative announced by Secretary Napolitano on August 18th will result in the administrative closure of an untold number of cases currently pending before our immigration and federal courts. In combination with the June 17th ICE memo, these new policies send the message that your Administration is turning a blind eye to those who have broken our immigration laws. We are also concerned that these policies appear to be a direct attempt to categorically legalize those who are unlawfully in the country and to allow undocumented individuals to remain in violation of the law without fear of apprehension or deportation…”

    Really, Senator? Ya’ think? Begging and pleading with the now obviously criminal US chief executive has done no good in the past, will do no good now or into the future. But, Congress already knows that. Remember that it has “kinda’ sorta’” joined him by establishing its own unconstitutional “Super Congress” that bypasses the will of We-the-People in favor of only twelve Congress people. But, I digress. Let’s return to the issues and Obama rogue “presidency” of our lawbreaker-in-chief.

    Here is only a very brief (compared to what he has done) Obama offense list (aka “Rap-Sheet”):

    * Obama’s First Executive Order (#13489) and first official act as POTUS sealed any and all past information about him, including his birth certificate, college and other school transcripts and any and all other records that could damage his invented persona. Obama became the first true “don’t ask me ’cause I won’t tell you” usurper Chief Executive
    * Obama introduced and—after months of trying to convince Americans it’s “for your own (and especially the Obama syndicate’s) good” and failing—then he and his (then) completely controlled Marxist-Democrat Congress forced ObamaCare down our throats. This gave Obama control over 1/6 of the American economy—to do with as he pleases (which by-the-way will NOT include health care)
    * The forced-upon-us Obama Stimulus (#1) gave Obama & Co the ability to further raid & gut the US Treasury—which he and his criminal band of smiley-faced demons accomplished with great relish! Today, approximately $200Billions still remain unaccounted for. Did they magically enter overseas bank accounts or DNC slush funds, perhaps? And now, Obama and the Federal Reserve are discussing another stimulus? Is this to requisition (aka “redistribute”) the rest of what once was (before Obama) OUR money?
    * Although Obama and US Attorney General Eric Holder continue to deny it, the Obama syndicate enacted “Operation Gunwalker: Fast and Furious.” In 2009 (see below video link to “C-span2 David Ogden Project Gun Runner Mexico March 24 2009“-changed later to “Gunwalker”), Deputy US Attorney General David Ogden told of the Obama-Holder plan. I’ve known about it since that time and have even cited it in several other columns. Why does Congress still claim ignorance? Are they actually saying that “gun runner” and “Gunwalker” are two separate programs? Give us a break
    * Documents show that the Obama syndicate not only “walked” guns to the Mexican drug cartels but, show that it has also, apparently, chosen sides and partnered with the Sinaloa drug cartel. This is so blatantly criminal that if ever REALLY investigated and proven—and in a sane reality—should land all the members of Obama’s illegal regime in prison
    * As no one is stopping him, Obama is now simply ignoring Congress, US law and the US Constitution. He has bypassed and is still bypassing US immigration law and enacting executive orders (the latest is another illegal aliens amnesty) and ignoring the law altogether by telling ICE to ignore illegals
    * Despite a 2010 Appeals Court ruling banning Obama’s now apparently wholly-owned and controlled FCC from enacting “Net Neutrality” (aka censorship and Obama-control of the Internet) the Obama syndicate has decided to—again—ignore the law. The FCC is currently engaged in enacting this court-banned program
    * Obama has appointed and continues to appoint members of the Muslim Brotherhood (the parent organization of Al-Qaeda and Hamas amongst others) to high-level US government positions—many of them involving US Security!—and has recently announced that the Obama syndicate will now have formal relations with this avowed enemy of the USA

    These are only the tip of the iceberg of Obama’s patently illegal and treasonous activities. In saner and more ethical times, almost any one of the above would have led to his removal from office and possible—or likely—imprisonment.

    We used to have moral, ethical, honorable and courageous men and women in our country’s leadership. Tragically, those days seem to have passed. But, have the days of all of our so-called leaders actually wanting and working toward the continuation of the USA as a Republic also passed by the wayside?

    We now have a resident of what was once our White House working every day to ensure We-the-People become his—and his alone—willing slaves. Every program and action he takes proves it. Yet, no one in any leadership position tries, except via pretense, to stop him and his minions. Our leadership is bereft of bravery and honesty. Even many of those who claimed to be constitutionalists now seem top have joined the establishment. We MUST elect only those with a proven record of being strong and ethical. Do any of you still remember Ronald Reagan? He would never have folded as the RINOs have now done. We need that kind of leader now. If we fail, please make sure you have weapons at the ready and enough ammo to last a long time. I think you’ll need it.

    Grassley Begs Obama not to give Amnesty to Illegal-Alien Criminals:

    $162 million in stimulus funds unaccounted for:

    C-span2 David Ogden Project Gun Runner Mexico March 24 2009:

    Documents: Obama Admin. “Walked” Guns to Sinaloa Cartel, Allowed Cocaine into U.S.:

    Political Meddling Impacts Telecom Industry:

    U.S. court rules against FCC on Net neutrality:

    Obama officials meet & announce direct contacts with Muslim Brotherhood:

    Obama Has Quietly Installed Muslims In Key U.S. Security and Foreign Policy Positions:

  15. Why the smiley face?

    Alvin T. Onaka, the fizzician who allegedly signed the real obama bc,
    has a smiley face.

    How did that get released?

    Look the WH isn’t totally stupid. IMHO they are not stupid at all,
    rather they are following an evil Manchurian agenda.

    So why allow the smiley face BC?

    Because it is Obama saying screw ya all,

    the real bc is not like what yall imagine and I am
    just goin to mess with ya.

    It’s the Malcolm X thing again

    Makes far more sense,

    this is from Pamela Geller, whom I implicitly trust
    Above, the New Black Panther party endorsing President Obama in 2008 (and posted on Obama’s antisemitic campaign website) before it was scrubbed.

    Now Andrew Breitbart has obtained photos of Obama appearing and marching with members of the racist hate group back in 2007.

    There is no doubt in my mind that this is the reason why Obama’s Department of Justice dropped the open and shut case against the Black Panther party when they threatened voters with weapons at Philly voting booths during the presidential election in 2008.

    Shock Photos: Candidate Obama Appeared And Marched With New Black Panther Party in 2007

    New photographs obtained exclusively by reveal that Barack Obama appeared and marched with members of the New Black Panther Party as he campaigned for president in Selma, Alabama in March 2007.

    The photographs, captured from a Flickr photo-sharing account before it was scrubbed, are the latest evidence of the mainstream media’s failure to examine Obama’s extremist ties and radical roots.

    In addition, the new images raise questions about the possible motives of the Obama administration in its infamous decision to drop the prosecution of the Panthers for voter intimidation.

    The images, presented below, also renew doubts about the transparency of the White House’s guest logs–in particular, whether Panther National Chief Malik Zulu Shabazz is the same “Malik Shabazz” listed among the Obama administration’s early visitors.

    Tomorrow, J. Christian Adams, the Department of Justice whistleblower in the New Black Panther Party case, will release his new book, Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department (Regnery).

    The book exposes Obama administration corruption far beyond the Panther dismissal, and reveals how the institutional Left has turned the power of the DOJ into an ideological weapon.

    Adams’s book also describes, in detail, the Selma march at which then-Senator Obama was joined by a group of Panthers who had come to support his candidacy.

    Among those appearing with Obama was Shabazz, the Panther leader who was one of the defendants in the voter intimidation case that Attorney General Eric Holder dismissed. Also present was the Panthers’ “Minister of War,” Najee Muhammed, who had called for murdering Dekalb County, Georgia, police officers with AK-47’s and then mocking their widows in this video (7:20 – 8:29).

    Injustice includes a disturbing photo of Shabazz and the Panthers marching behind Obama with raised fists in the “Black Power” salute.

    There are even more photographs.

    I have learned that Regnery initially received approval from a person who took pictures of the events in Selma to publish these additional photographs in Injustice.

    After the photographer wrote Regnery reversing his permission to include the photographs in Injustice, the images were removed from the photographer’s Flickr account. Yet we were able to capture them before they disappeared.

    The photographs show Obama sharing the same podium at the event with the Panthers.

    In the first image, Shabazz stands at the podium, surrounded by uniformed Panthers, including Muhammed. In the second photograph, Obama commands the same podium.

    Here are the images:

    The First Amendment allows photographs of such enormous public importance to see the light of day. Cases, including one involving skimpy photographs of Miss Puerto Rico, have established that fair use and the First Amendment allow publication of these photos.

    It is true that then-Senator Hillary Clinton and Al Sharpton were also in Selma at the same event. But the Panthers explicitly came to Selma to support Obama, as Adams details in Injustice.

    They spoke with Obama at the podium shown above, and departed together with Obama for the main march itself, as shown by this grainer image captured from YouTube:

    Obama seems not to be reviled by the Panthers in any of the video or photographs. And Obama’s own campaign website would post an endorsement by the New Black Panther Party in March 2008. As Adams writes in Injustice:

    Somehow, the fact that the future President of the United States shared a podium with leaders of the New Black Panthers, marched with them, and received a public, formal greeting from their party has vanished from the history of Obama’s campaign. Apart from [Juan] Williams’ single dispatch, no other media outlets ever reported it.

    After NPR initially reported that the Panthers were present at the event with Obama, subsequent reports from Selma omitted any mention of the hate group appearing with the future President.

    Had any of Obama’s opponents appeared at an event with the KKK or Aryan Nation, The New York Times would have had to double its ink buy.

    Obama’s appearance does much more than expose mainstream media hypocrisy. It also exposes an association between a vile racist organization and a future President of the United States. Only the degree of association is subject to debate.

    And only a few voices outside the mainstream media have continued to press the Obama administration about its past and present ties to fringe groups.

    I have been calling for the White House to disclose which Malik Shabazz visited the private White House residence on July 25, 2009, two months after the DOJ voter intimidation case was dismissed. So far, the White House has refused to do so, leaving open the question of which “Malik Shabazz” appears in visitor logs released to the public.

    • While the media is busy asking Perry about a rock that SOMEONE painted racist graffiti on 30 years ago, and asking Herman Cain to condemn Perry for something HE didn’t do and for which there’s NO EVIDENCE that I’ve seen that the epithet was visible “recently” as Amanpour implied, could they spare some time to ask Barry to DISTANCE himself from these black haters? From these black RACISTS? From these black SUPREMISTS? How about they ask him to decry the hateful rhetoric of Jimmie Hoffa Jr.? Another hater. How about they get to the Congressional Black Caucus and ask them to distance themselves from hating racists who call Herman Cain and Allen West “oreos”?

      There could be a long association between Barry and the Black Panthers. That’s another thing that’s likely been scrubbed. Thank goodness somebody got these photos.

    • Aaron Klein of WND weighs in on this topic:

      “Speaking to WND, Shabazz boasted he met Obama when the politician attended the 42nd anniversary of the voting rights marches in Selma in 2007. … Shabazz himself has given scores of speeches condemning “white men” and Jews.

      The NBPP’s official platform states “white man has kept us deaf, dumb and blind,” refers to the “white racist government of America,” demands black people be exempt from military service and uses the word Jew repeatedly in quotation marks.

      Shabazz has led racially divisive protests and conferences, such as the 1998 Million Youth March in which a few thousand Harlem youths reportedly were called upon to scuffle with police officers and speakers demanded the extermination of whites in South Africa. The NBPP chairman was quoted at a May 2007 protest against the 400-year celebration of the settlement of Jamestown, Va., stating, “When the white man came here, you should have left him to die.”

      He claimed Jews engaged in an “African holocaust,” and he has promoted the anti-Semitic urban legend that 4,000 Israelis fled the World Trade Center just prior to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. … The NBPP’s deceased chairman, Khallid Abdul Muhammad, a former Nation of Islam leader who was once considered Louis Farrakhan’s most trusted adviser, gave speeches referring to the “white man” as the “devil” and claiming that “there is a little bit of Hitler in all white people.” … Muhammad, lionized on the NBPP site, referred to Jews as “bloodsuckers,” labeled the pope a “no-good cracker” and advocated the murder of white South Africans who would not leave the nation subsequent to a 24-hour warning.”

      So while the lamestream is harping on Rick Perry about racist graffiti he didn’t write 30 years ago and his “stand” on Confederate symbols, we have the CURRENT POTUS who consorted with RACISTS WHO PROMOTE VIOLENCE with nary a peep from them, asking him to explain himself.

      ESPN deep sixes a song by Hank Williams Jr. because he made an apt analogy about Netanyahu and Hitler, and yet nobody in the lamestream asks OBAMA why he hangs out with people whose idol said EVERY “WHITE” person has “a little bit of Hitler” in his/her makeup.

  16. Report: Iranian Warship Route to U.S. Coast Leaked Online
    October 6, 2011 at 2:28am by Buck Sexton

    Last week, an Iranian Naval Commander threatened to deploy ships off the U.S. coast as a provocative show of force.
    Now it looks like Iran might actually be serious.

    A new map that allegedly shows the expected path of the Iranian Naval expedition to the U.S has leaked online from an Iranian website, according to MEMRI.

    The unprecedented route for the Islamic Republic would take Iranian ships through the Suez Canal and into the warm waters of the Caribbean, a total nautical distance of approximately 9000 miles. According to MEMRI, Iranian media sources claim:

    “In this new and feasible mission, the ships of the navy of the Iranian Army will sail west, towards the Strait of Gibraltar, after they enter the Mediterranean. Subsequently, they will enter the Atlantic Ocean, and from there they must traverse the long distance to their destination off Cuba, in the Gulf of Mexico, and Central and South America.”

    Iranian Naval chief Sayyari has previously threatened on Iranian state TV to send a fleet of warships into the Atlantic armed with “Nour” long-range anti-ship cruise missiles. The proposed Iranian flotilla would be an extension of Iran’s presence in the Mediterranean, the Persian Gulf, and the Indian Ocean.

    Iranian warships deployed close to the U.S. mainland would be a deliberate provocation. The warships could be viewed as additional leverage– alongside Iran’s threat to cut off oil supplies through the gulf of Hormuz– if Israel were to strike against Iranian nuclear facilities.

    MEMRI pulled a second map from the Iranian website that had no accompanying description, but showed a number of western countries in different colors, including the U.S., Cuba, Venezuela, Panama, Ecuador and Brazil. See Below:

    The Iranian regime has already established close ties to Venezuela and Cuba
    , but the inclusion of the other Central and South American countries remains unclear, according to MEMRI.

    In addition, an unconfirmed report in an Italian newspaper in September claimed Hezbollah– a terrorist proxy of Iran– has opened up a base in Cuba. This allegation was repeated by Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann just last week.

    Whether Iran launches this aggressive naval action or not, the Ayatollahs are clearly looking for ways to agitate the United States and complicate international efforts to contain the number one global sponsor of terrorism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s