Terrorist Attacks in Oslo, Norway

By Bridgette

Shock and Horror in Norway


Explosion tore open buildings in Oslo, Norway on Friday, July 22, 2011 (AP Photo/Scanpix, Thomas Winje Øijord)


On Friday, July 22, a suspected terrorist rampage  killed 92 people, 97  are wounded, and 5 are  still missing in two different terrorist episodes.   There is no other name for people who commit such atrocities.  They are mass murderers, terrorists, and sick individuals.   Unfortunately in Norway, there is no death penalty for such criminals.   They can go free in 20 years or less.

The police have arrested one  suspect,  Anders Behring Breivik,who was quickly labeled as not only a Christian,  but as a right-wing extremist.  His political  views were publicized as being Anti-Marxist and Anti-Islamic.  His attorney stated on Sunday that his client wanted to bring about a revolution in Norway.  Although Breivik says he worked alone, police are looking for other accomplices.

A photo of Breivik that was found in his manifesto. The AP said they altered the photo to remove the background.

Like the Unibomber, a 1,500 page manifesto  was supposedly posted  online before the attack.   Police have not confirmed that the 32-year-old Breivik wrote the document being attributed to him under a pseudonym, but his lawyer referred to it and said Breivik had been working on it for years. It is said that in the document he attacked multiculturalism, Muslim immigration and discussed how to acquire explosives.

Like the Oklahoma City bombing, pounds of fertilizer were purchased, and used to blow up a government building that housed the prime minister of Norway and other government officials.  An hour and a half later a gunman or two attacked and shot unwitting people who were attending the leftist Labor Party’s youth retreat at a nearby  island.

Atlas Shrugs found that Breivik’s  Facebook page was altered to state that he was a Christian right after his name was announced to the public.  Who would have the authority to make changes to his Facebook if the man was in custody of the police?   There are screen shots showing the before and after alterations.  She also questioned “Why did a jihad group take credit for the atrocities, and then retract?    In photos found online today  like the one of Breivik above, the AP states they are digitally altering photos they have.  We must wonder  and question why.

Facts and information are still sketchy but as details emerge, commenters will keep us updated.


96 responses to “Terrorist Attacks in Oslo, Norway

  1. Comments started on another thread regarding Norway are being moved here to keep the subject comments together.

    Miri | July 22, 2011 at 11:08 am


    That was fast. Al Qaeda reported to be setting sights on Europe because supposedly it’s too hard to attack here, so there’s an attack today in Oslo.

    “A massive bomb shattered Norway’s main government building in Oslo Friday, killing two people police were quoted as saying by local news agency NTB.

    There was no claim of responsibility, though NATO member Norway has been the target of threats, if not bombs, before, notably over its involvement in conflicts in Afghanistan and Libya. Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg was safe, NTB said.”

    • Thanks for moving all that Bridgette. I meant to do it yesterday, when I realized we were going to need a separate post, so as not to screw up your other one. But personal events got in the way. I appreciate it. Sorry, too, that I didn’t read your entire post before commenting on it from the dashboard. My bad. I repeated stuff you already said!

    • Miri | July 23, 2011 at 3:42 pm

      “And if this was faked, can we trust any of the material that is now being released about Breivik being anti-jihad?”

      We can trust NOTHING that is being released by any of the lamestream media organizations. Yes, why did an Islamist terrorist group praise the attack and take responsibility? Suddenly, it’s a “homegrown” domestic terrorist. BLONDE! BLUE-EYED!

      Could he have been a paid mercenary? Yes. Could he have been a Muslim convert? Yes. There will be no truth coming out. And we’re supposed to believe that one guy can shoot 87 individuals, too. It took 30 minutes for SWAT teams to arrive. Since it’s an island, could accomplices have escaped by boat?

      “A man fitting Breivik’s description was reportedly seen in the area of the bombing [hours away, in Oslo] prior to the explosion.” http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/norway-attacks-anders-behring-breivik-reported-suspect/story?id=14139886

      There were probably HUNDREDS of Norwegians fitting his description in the area of the bombing. Do Norwegians look alike? Uh, yes. They tend to. Coordinated attacks are THE hallmark of Al Qaeda and jihadists.

      I don’t know. Jury’s out on this one.

      One thing I do know: We can no longer trust the lamestream media. Nor can we trust that the powers that be will tell the TRUTH to a very scared population in Norway, who all believed that they were exempt because they’re “peaceful” and “neutral”. It was only days ago that Al Qaeda announced that they’re turning their sights on Europe. Was that just coincidence?

    • Miri | July 23, 2011 at 4:32 pm

      “The Norwegian man suspected in a bombing and shooting spree that killed at least 92 people bought six tons of fertilizer before the massacre, the supplier said Saturday as police investigated witness accounts of a second shooter.”

      They compare it to Oklahoma City on Drudge. Right. Right down to the eyewitness reports of accomplices who got away. A Muslim-looking one, as reported in OK?

      If he did hold anti-jihadist views, could he possibly be considered a “freedom fighter” like the Mau Mau in Kenya? Not taking common cause with this criminal, because NOTHING excuses such actions. Just pointing out how the lamestream will PRAISE their favored terrorists whilst piling on any that can be tarred as “Christian” or “conservative” or “right-wing.” There will be NO TRUTH coming out about this guy. Bet on it.

      Oh, yeah. No wonder Barry was so quick to send condolences.

    • This website CONFIRMS what Geller wrote AND says that this Facebook page was ALWAYS bogus and that the lamestream media continues to cite it. http://www.solidprinciples.com/blog/anders-behring-breivik-facebook-profile-a-fake/

      It’s really confusing because it involves Wikipedia, too. They asked the same question: How does a guy in custody change HIS Facebook page?

      About his lawyer–Was this lawyer appointed by the liberal government of Norway? Is this going to be a lawyer of the caliber that LTC Lakin had or that Kenneth Gladney had prosecuting on his behalf?

  2. Bridgette | July 23, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    WikiLeaks files show Norway unprepared for terror attack
    22 Jul 2011 Snips

    Norway’s intelligence service had previously been criticised for its failure to keep track of suspected terror cells and the country was felt to be complacent about the prospect of a terror attack, secret cables from the WikiLeaks files reveal.

    A memo written in 2009, describes the country’s security service as “in over its head” and adds “it simply cannot keep up.” Separate cables state that the country felt “immune” from terrorism and that groups such as Al Qaeda were “not a direct threat”. One memo describes how US authorities had to “press” their Norwegian counterparts to take terrorism seriously and says there was a feeling “that terrorism happens elsewhere, not in peaceful Norway.”

    Talking about an attempt by the Police Security Service (PST) to track one particular suspected Al Qaeda terror cell, a cable written by the US Ambassador to Norway, Barry White, describes investigators as “committed, competent and co-operative, generally”. But he goes on to describe how they refused the help of the UK authorities to put surveillance on a potential suspect and adds: “Not only will they not put their own resources on him…but they also just turned down the visiting UK intel service’s offer of two twelve-person surveillance teams.”

    A second memo, written in 2007, is titled “Pakistani Norwegians ripe for radicalisation?” It warns of the potential of Pakistani-Norwegian youths being radicalised and describes Norway as a “country that continues to feel immune from terrorism.


  3. Miri | July 23, 2011 at 4:50 pm

    Sounds like a motive to dissemble. Drudge links to some website that has to be translated, but it locks my browser and appears to be tabloid stuff. They show the purported gunman (who the police DON’T confirm as the guy named or the guy in the picture–yet) in Nazi-like costume. The pics look photoshopped. If Lulzsec can hack News Corp, Sony, and others and if Wikileaks can hack NATO and the Pentagon (didn’t they?), then who can believe ANYTHING that’s reported to have been posted on the Web by this so-called perp? His Facebook page CHANGED after he’s named? That tabloidy site alleges he posted a “manifesto” somewhere before the attack.

    While anything’s possible, it’s AS LIKELY and AS POSSIBLE that nothing is as it seems and it’s all Kabuki theater. Obama coming out so fast talking about how all countries have to be on guard for “this type” of terrorism sets off my radar. How about you? If the arrested suspect was obviously Muslim, Barry would be mum.

    I simply don’t believe any of this at this point, except that the horror took place.

  4. Bridgette | July 23, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    The offender (Norway gunman) let out the video and manifesto on the Web
    July 23, 2011

    There are sources in the police confirming this to the TV 2. Anders Behring Breivik (32) Prior to the attacks, published a long manifesto and a video on the Internet, where he describes the attacks he was about to perform. The video and document “Marxist Hunter” It is about more than twelve minutes long video, which Behring Brevik compare “themselves” with Knights, and encourage a year-long war against Marxism and Islamism.….In the document, which is over 1500 pages the author elaborates on events throughout history and will repeatedly return to the Knights Templar, or Knights Templar as they say in English. Today, the Knights Templar, an order within the Masonic movement, which also Anders Behring Breivik was a member of. He will now be excluded from the Masonic Order.

    He has also published a manuscript of 1,500 pages which he explains very extreme political views. In addition, he describes in detail how an attack is to be carried out. Everything from the use of the car bomb of the type of equipment to be used in an attack. The document is signed with a pseudonym as the most likely Behring Anders Breivik.


  5. Miri | July 23, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    Excuse me for thinking this, but doesn’t tarring this guy as “anti-Marxist” and “anti-Islamic” just set up a perfect meme for the 2012 election? In 2008, the meme was that if you disagreed with Barry, you were a racist bigot. If you said he was Muslim, which he was and may still be, you were racist AND an Islamophobe and a religious bigot.

    Now they KNOW that candidates in 2012 are going to bring up the FACT that Barry has long been Marxist and that the fundamental transformation he wants and is trying to institute in America is MARXIST.

    Therefore, how convenient is it if they can tie being anti-Marxist to this horrible terrorist attack?! Just like how they TRIED to tie the Tea Party to racism.

    If they can intimidate all his opponents in 2012 into NOT SPEAKING about his MARXISM for fear that this will connect the opponent to this terrorist asshat, it all works in Barry’s favor. It’s exactly like how they try to connect Sarah Palin to what happened to Gabriele Giffords. No connection, but whatever works. By any means necessary.

    btw, I’ve been searching and I can find NOTHING about this guy prior to yesterday. Not even using the Wayback Machine for a Facebook page (disappeared) or the Google timeline function. Try it. See if YOU can find this 1500-page manifesto (that was posted under a pseudonym, anyway). See if you can find any blog postings or comments by him.

    This is way too suspicious. Who was the other gunman and why did it take SWAT 90 minutes to arrive on the scene? How did they catch THIS perp? How did he get onto the island? Why didn’t he leave? Excuse me for being paranoid, but I trust nothing anymore. Especially anything coming out of leftist lamestream media outlets.

    A perfect distraction, btw, from Barry’s failure on the debt limit.

  6. Miri | July 23, 2011 at 9:33 pm


    I have a feeling that article will come in handy to explain what this guy says he opposed: Cultural Marxism. Aka political correctness plus multiculturalism, etc.

    And so now they have a new meme to attack their opponents with: They’ll tie being “anti-immigrant” and nationalism to this violence and try to blame everyone who believes we should enforce our borders and guard against Islamic jihad as “potentially violent domestic terrorists.” Where have we heard that before? Southern Poverty Law Center?

  7. Defence: – In his mind it was necessary
    Anders Behring Breivik thought it was cruel to carry out the killings, but said it was necessary.
    24.07.2011 08.34

    Persons charged with terrorist Anders Behring Breivik has confessed to being behind the shooting of Utøya in interrogation, but denies guilt.

    It is very difficult for me to give a reasonable summary of what he said in the interview, says defender Geir Lippe City to TV 2 on Saturday night. For several hours he listened to Breivik’s explanation for the police, where he has explained the scene and planning. – Thought it was awful. He has said a lot about the subject but I want to think about it before I say anything about it, says Lippe City.

    What he thinks about what he has done?

    – – Also it is difficult to say anything sensible about. He explained the seriousness of the matter, the incredible extent of injuries and fatalities. His reaction was that it was cruel to execute the killings, but in his mind it was necessary.

    After the hearing will Breivik be made for a doctor to assess his medical condition. There will be several interviews over the weekend, but Breivik is prepared to meet in Oslo District Court on Monday and explain in detention meeting. He has also been cooperative to the police.

    He has made no secret of what he has done and has said he will give evidence and tell why in the prison meeting.

    Scheduled for a long time
    The attacks have Breivik planned for a long time, according to the defender. This was planned over time. The manifesto was also something he has worked with over many years. He talked a lot about it in the interrogation, and about why he published it.


    • Do I have this straight? His public defender, his lawyer, goes out on TV and says his client confessed and then talks about his motivation? Does this sound like he’s about to get a fair trial or the people of the world are going to learn the truth? Can you say, “RAILROAD?”

  8. Muslims feel sting of initial blame
    Initial rumors suggested Islamist terrorists might be behind the Norway attacks. ‘This is predictable … but it is sad, says a Muslim advocate in the U.S.
    July 23, 2011, 7:08 p.m.

    In the immediate wake of the bombing and mass shooting in Norway that left at least 92 people dead Friday, Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg declared that it was too early to say whether terrorism was involved.

    Some interpreted the statement to mean it was unclear whether Muslim extremists were behind the attack.

    Right-wing websites quickly pointed the finger at “jihadis,” and Pamela Geller, publisher of the website Atlas Shrugs and executive director of Stop Islamization of America, wrote on her site: “You can ignore jihad, but you cannot avoid the consequences of ignoring jihad.”

    Counter-terrorism experts soon weighed in, implicating Al Qaeda.

    Then Anders Behring Breivik, described by police as a “right-wing Christian fundamentalist,” was arrested in connection with the attacks.

    Within the Muslim community, there was a sigh of relief that it wasn’t someone connected with their religion, but also a sting at being initially scapegoated — not unlike what occurred immediately after the Oklahoma City bombing by right-wing American extremists in 1995.

    Cont. more on how the Muslims feel rather than about the attack on the Norwegians. The authors name is a give away as to what you’ll read..By Raja Abdulrahim.


    • Well, if we take a page from the leftist drivel that gets printed in this country, excusing all manner of criminals (like Billy Ayers and Bernardine), then we might blame Muslims for driving him to it. You know, blame the victim? Excuse the perp because the culture created so much stress on him that the devil made him do it?

      In NO WAY am I saying this is correct. I believe that the perpetrator of this horrible atrocity deserves DEATH himself, not only 21 years in prison. Can you believe it? The MAXIMUM he can get, no matter how many killed. Sentences must all run consecutively? Amazing. This is what comes of coddling criminals.

      I wonder if an UNPROVED “right-winger” will get as much sympathy, compassion, and understanding for HIS motivations as all the other criminals who sit in Norwegian prisons for their 21 years receive.

      I’d like to point out to the LA Times that MUSLIMS weighed in, implicating themselves! So now we can guess that likely CAIR is behind the scrub-a-dub-dubbing. Ministry of Truth–rewriting history as we go along. All for the greater good to stamp out any potential Islamophobia that lurks, like original sin, below the surface of far-too-many blue-eyed-blonde populations (and also any “white” ones).

  9. At Least 80 Dead in Norway Shooting
    July 22, 2011 Snips

    A terror group, Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or the Helpers of the Global Jihad, issued a statement claiming responsibility for the attack, according to Will McCants, a terrorism analyst at C.N.A., a research institute that studies terrorism. The message said the attack was a response to Norwegian forces’ presence in Afghanistan and to unspecified insults to the Prophet Muhammad. “We have warned since the Stockholm raid of more operations,” the group said, according to Mr. McCants’ translation, apparently referring to a bombing in Sweden in December 2010. “What you see is only the beginning, and there is more to come.”

    Norway is a member of the NATO alliance and has a small fighting contingent in Afghanistan. It was one of several countries named by Ayman al-Zawahri, the leader of Al Qaeda, as potential targets for attack. In 2006, Norwegian newspapers reprinted Danish cartoons that angered Muslims by lampooning Muhammad.


    • Wiki is getting faster and faster..A new entry is listed for this terror group as of 22 July 2011 18:12. This just clears it all up …not.

      Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, “helpers of the global jihad”) is an organization that was reported by Will McCants [1] to have first claimed responsibility for the 2011 Oslo attacks on 22 July 2011 [2] by means of a statement to the internet forum Shmukh that was eventually removed.[1]

      The New York Times reported that one Western organization attributed the attack to the organization, as “a response to Norwegian forces’ presence in Afghanistan and to unspecified insults to the Prophet Muhammad.”[2]

      The Wall Street Journal published a report that Norway TV had reported that Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami said “This is just the beginning of what will come” but added “It’s unclear that the group has taken responsibility.”[3]

      The Times added that Norwegian television reports indicated that Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami had denied involvement in the attacks.[2]

      Someone identifying as Abu Sulayman al-Nasir who had posted the first claim of responsibility later made a further statement to Shmukh retracting it, stating that the attacker “must surely be known to all.”[1]

      1 ^ a b c McCants, Will. “Alleged Claim for Oslo Attacks”. Jihadica. http://www.jihadica.com/alleged-claim-for-oslo-attacks/. Retrieved 24 July 2011.
      2 ^ a b c Mala, Eliza; Goodman, J. David (22 July 2011). “Blasts Followed by Gun Attack in Norway”. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/23/world/europe/23oslo.html?hp. Retrieved 22 July 2011.
      3 ^ Duxbury, Charles (22 July 2011). “Deadly Attacks Shake Norway”. Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903461104576461862078291234.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories. Retrie


    • What a conundrum! We’re left to choose between versions of “the truth”. Who’s telling truth? Bilderbergers or Jihadists? This is what it’s come to.

      As with OK City, there IS indeed a report of another gunman, someone small, DARK, and not wearing a police uniform.

      Why, btw, does every news story mention the guy’s blonde hair and blue-eyes? Are these journalists RACISTS or something?

      So apparently there’s NO security on the ferries and NONE at the youth camp? There’s still no PROOF that the suspect wrote that manifesto and most of these postings they say he made on Twitter and Facebook are VERY recent. This is all very lutefisky.

      Some reports say he was in an (wait for it …) anti-tax, anti-immigration, small-government party. Sound familiar?

      BUT others say the party he was once in is the second largest in Norway, mainstream, AND is (was?) running in the lead in polls for this next election.

      Now the NY Times story Bridgette linked says the “liberal government” was the gunman’s target. Or was it? What will happen now?

      People will likely turn against the minority party, so as not to appear, even in their own minds, as being hateful or anti-immigrant or siding with terrorists. Guess what? The LIBS win again! Fishy to me. I’m sorry.

      If this liberal government is in charge, and since it was reported to be lax on Islamic terrorism, since this attack happened, then what to do? It surely would take a huge conspiracy to pin it on a Norwegian, but what about that dark-haired guy who got away? Who was he?

      Think about the political fallout for the libs, losing in polls already, for a successful Al Qaeda attack to happen on this scale.

      What sounds more likely to be true? Think about this. This NY Times story must have, at one point, contained the paragraph Bridgette posted. Go to the link now. IT’S NO LONGER THERE.

      The authors say the story was changed, but not to remove that paragraph about that group taking credit. The story now talks about the Muslim group, but says they’re not sure it really exists. BUT they don’t say anything about them taking credit. Here’s how it reads now:

      “Initial reports focused on the possibility of Islamic militants, in particular Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or Helpers of the Global Jihad, cited by some analysts as claiming responsibility for the attacks. American officials said the group was previously unknown and might not even exist.”

      Here’s their correction, sans any mention of removing the part about Jihadis taking credit:
      “Correction: July 22, 2011 An earlier version of this article erroneously stated that Utoya is about 25 miles northwest of Oslo. In fact, it is 19 miles from central Oslo.” NOTICE: No mention of the removal of the part about that group taking credit or the rationale for the attack. WHY? WTF? Are they THAT worried about losing Europe to conservatives because of the Islamification of Europe? What a blow to the Soros NWO if conservatives win in Norway.

      Remember, too, Pam Geller’s story about how his Facebook page was changed AFTER the attack, after his arrest, to say he’s a Christian. I was NEVER one to easily believe in these conspiracy theories but this is starting to defy logic and common sense. Is their version of how this played out believable?

      This article at NRO proves that paragraph WAS THERE and is not NOW there, with no explanation for the deletion.


      3:20 p.m. the perp’s in Oslo, blowing up buildings.

      SWAT took 90 minutes to get to the island after the shootings were reported by people at the lake.

      5:31 p.m. A UK report says the cops are on site at the island. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/jul/22/oslo-explosion-live-coverage [NOTE: This story links to other stories where jihadists took credit BUT those links are scrubbed or changed now, too, from what the stories originally said! Even on Drudge, there WAS a line saying that Al Qaeda took credit. See below.]

      Is there much time in there for this same perp to go from Oslo to the island, do the shootings as methodically as they say, and then wait 90 minutes for cops to arrest him? Keep in mind that he had to drive from Oslo to the ferry landing (a circuitous route) and then take a ferry to the island. The ferryman was reported to have questioned him about his story and taking guns to the island. He claimed he wanted to check security there, on account of the bombing in Oslo.

      Where’d he get the car? What route did he take? I heard a report that said he “drove” to the island. How does one DRIVE to an island?

      The link above quotes this from another story:

      “Peter Beaumont, foreign affairs editor at the Observer, says a jihadist group is most likely to be behind the blast: It has been known for some time that al-Qaida core and other related “franchises” – including in the most active in Yemen – have been attempting to develop operations. Which leads to a second question: why Norway?…”

      THAT PARAGRAPH IS GONE FROM THE STORY, WITH NO EXPLANATION. The link remains, the story is changed to scrub what this man wrote about Al Qaeda and to insert this:

      “The most tempting and immediate conclusion was that it would be a jihadist group, as the style of the Oslo attack bore strong similarities to other earlier attacks in Europe and elsewhere. But Norwegian police said that the individual believed responsible for the shooting in Utøya, a 32-year-old Norwegian man, was also spotted in Olso before the bombing there.”

      NO update notification, except there’s a tab for “article history” that says only that the story was changed. No explanation for why or what was changed.

      There is nothing in the Google cache, so they must have requested that the older version be removed. WHY? So, another rewriting of history AFTER THE FACT by the Ministry of Truth?

      IF these people were real journalists, then they’d transparently “correct” their stories or just leave them alone.

      WHY and under WHOSE ORDERS have these initial reports been changed?

      Did this group take credit? IF not, then where did the quote from their explanation come from?

      IF they took credit and they didn’t do the attack, then why not just leave TRUTH BE TRUTH? Report that what they said appears to be a sham, not true, because they found a domestic perp!

      This is what makes people suspicious. WHY would they scrub these jihadists taking credit? It happened. Why change history? For political correctness? So they can completely pile on the Norwegian perp and forget all about the REAL threat and danger of Islamic terrorism? This link shows the group taking credit:

      الحمد لله ناصر عباده الموحدين ومذل اهل الشرك والكفر اجمعين والصلاة والسلام على نبينا محمد خاتم النبيين وعلى اله وصحبه اجمعين وبعد
      قال تعالى : (فَقَاتِلْ فِي سَبِيلِ اللّهِ لاَ تُكَلَّفُ إِلاَّ نَفْسَكَ وَحَرِّضِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ عَسَى اللّهُ أَن يَكُفَّ بَأْسَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ وَاللّهُ أَشَدُّ بَأْساً وَأَشَدُّ تَنكِيلاً) [النساء : 84]
      فها قد وصلت دول اوروبا رسالة اخرى من المجاهدين واثبات اخر لدول اوربا ان المجاهدين لن يقفوا مكتوفي الايدي تجاه حربهم ضد الاسلام والمسلمين.
      واليوم قد تم استهداف النرويج لتكون درسا وعبرة لباقي دول اوروبا وقد سبق ان هددنا منذ غزوة ستوكهولم بمزيد من العمليات وقد طالبنا دول اوروبا بسحب جيوشها من ارض افغانستان وايقاف حربها ضد الاسلام والمسلمين ونكرر تحذيرنا مجددا لدول اوروبا ونقول لهم نفذوا مطالب المجاهدين فما ترونه ليس سوى البداية والقادم اكثر من ذلك.
      اما عن اسباب استهداف النرويج فهي كثيرة اهمها مشاركتها في احتلال افغانستان والاساءة لنبينا الكريم محمد(صلى الله عليه وسلم).
      فالحمد لله ان مكن لعباده الموحدين ..وندعو الله ان يحفظ اخواننا ومجاهدينا في كل مكان.
      سبحانك اللهم وبحمدك اشهد ان لا اله الا انت استغرك واتوب اليك.

      ابو سليمان الناصر

      Translation: Praise be to God Nasser slaves combined and humiliating the people of shirk and kufr companions, prayer and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad, the Seal of the Prophets, his family and companions and after The Almighty said: (then fight for God but do not cost yourself and rouse the believers may be that Allah keeps those who disbelieve and Allah is more powerful and in punishment) [women: 84]

      Here have reached the countries of Europe is another message from the militants and further proof of the countries of Europe that the Mujahideen will not stand idly towards their war against Islam and Muslims.

      Today has been targeting Norway to be a lesson and a lesson to the rest of Europe has already threatened us since the invasion of Stockholm more operations has asked European countries to withdraw their armies from the land of Afghanistan and stop its war against Islam and Muslims, and we repeat our warning again to the countries of Europe and tell them carried out the demands of the mujahideen, what you see is only the beginning and the next more.

      The reasons for the targeting of Norway there are many of the most important of their participation in the occupation of Afghanistan and the abuse of our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).
      Praise God that enabled slaves to the combined .. and pray to God to save our brothers and our fighters everywhere.

      Glory and praise God I bear witness that no god but You Astgrk and I repent to you.

      Abu Suleiman Al-Nasser
      Ansar al-Jihad of the world

      btw, Barry expressed condolences within 3 hours of the attack, but shortly after a blonde-haired, blue-eyed man was reported arrested. Is this a record for him to send condolences when a terrorist attack happens?

      • I’m sure glad you were able to analyze and dissect it some more..after reading multiple news reports, I couldn’t make heads or tails of their information. But they sure were quick to jump on this one guy. Yet they didn’t say they captured him at the scene. More peculiar is where they found him, and if he has been set up as a fall guy..but he admits doing this horrible deed. Yet lots of psychopaths admit to crimes they didn’t commit as law enforcement will tell us.

        Somewhere I read that he owns a farm and because of that he was able to purchase fertilizer in huge quantities. But did they find that all the purchased fertilizer has now disappeared? How did he get from point A to Point B so quickly? We are to believe that this was a one man operation?

        • I hear you, Bridgette. (I updated my comment but got sidetracked for a while and didn’t post my update.)

          Why the scrubbing? That’s the point. Now they DO say they captured him at the scene. Yes, important point: MANY PSYCHOS willingly take credit for stuff they didn’t do. Is he a fall guy? That farm he had was called Geofarms. Sounds like one of those leftist progressive organic deals. Don’t you think? Remember, too, how one of Nixon’s psychos was willing to be assassinated if it helped Nixon’s cause. There’s no evidence whatsoever this guy was EVER violent. The postings on the Web, NOT DEFINITELY TRACED TO HIM, are RECENT. The manifesto isn’t yet traced TO HIM, definitely. In this age of Lulzsec and Wikileaks and forged BC’s, can we believe ANYTHING that’s on the Web? Can we believe that anybody posting on the Web is who they claim to be? NO, WE CANNOT. We also know that the lamestream media does NOT investigate and censors whatever they do know, for POLITICAL REASONS ALONE.

          McVeigh was a nutjob. The accomplice who was NEVER caught–the dark-haired swarthy guy described by multiple eyewitnesses, was said to be, possibly, his handler. Might this be the same situation with Breivik? THAT person WAS SEEN and described. He didn’t wear a uniform. Therefore, he could slip away. Couldn’t he? Anybody with a small boat could do the same.

          The explanations for his purchase of fertilizer is TOO PAT, especially considering how security has been tightened after OK and 9/11, all over the world. I’d love to know HOW Wikipedia had so much information, with footnotes!, so freaking fast? It’s almost as if it were written and planned for. Don’t you think?

          At this link, eoros wrote about that same NY Times article, “07/22/11 14:59 I just read the NYT account and was struck by this paragraph: ‘The attacks appeared to be part of a coordinated assault on the ordinarily peaceful Scandinavian nation, as images of the damaged government buildings called to mind past terror attacks in Beirut or Baghdad or Oklahoma City.'”

          That paragraph was scrubbed, too. btw, looked it up. The DRIVING distance between Oslo and that island (to the ferry) is about 36 minutes. It’s about 22 miles from Oslo, but I’d think you need to take into account the traffic that’s typical in a large city and the condition of the rural roads that he might have had to traverse, plus the speed limit. Rush hour might have been right around that time, depending upon work schedules in Norway. Factory workers here get off work about 3:30 p.m. Oslo is a big city. After a terror attack, I’d think traffic would be even slower. That timeline story says they ordered the city center to be evacuated.

          Did he perhaps fly there? Or take a boat? It will be interesting to see how they explain all this. How did he get the fertilizer bombs there? Did he have a van, car, or truck? Do they have surveillance cameras in Oslo like they do in the UK? Forgive me, too, but I have to ask this: If there really were only one guy and he was slow and methodical and there were over 100 kids and adults on that island, did he NEVER have his back to anyone who might have been hiding in trees or behind rocks and who might have organized a posse? That timeline story says there were over 700 people on that island at some AUF (?) event. May be a mistake but the figure is mentioned twice in the same story, and attributed to one reporter at least, who presumably was covering the political event.

          It’s a horrible thing to contemplate, no matter who the perp was. There’s nothing that can explain people who do such things, no matter their motivation. I’m going to have to go check what Pam Geller’s saying today. btw, I did read something yesterday that was trying to also tie him to support for Israel. It never ends.

          IF he really was a Christian, then surely there’s a congregation out there that will say he attended church every week.

          • Meant to say, too, that there are photos out there of him in military garb with weapons. Guess what? They admit that the photos are photoshopped BUT they claim all they did was remove the background. Plausible deniability? Just sayin’. This is lutefisky.

            6:12 he’s in custody but 6:40 police are saying the person responsible for the bombing is “foreign”.

            Close to 9:00, they said the preliminary search was complete and 9 or 10 dead.

            An hour and a half later, the prime minister is still saying 10 dead. 3 hours later than that, they say the guy acted alone and did both attacks, but the source was speaking anonymously. Just minutes later, this from a reporter:

            “Just been directed to what is reportedly the Facebook profile of the Utøya gunman. For obvious reasons I cannot share that yet. Looks crazy. The gunman had his own company, dealing with geofarming, which would explain access to explosives. The Oklahoma bomb was made of ammonium nitrate, which is frequently used in geo-farming. The Utøya gunman has a company dealing with it… The 32 year old ethnic Norwegian national arrested for the Utøya shootings belongs to a right-wing group, reports TV2.” http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2011/jul/22/oslo-explosion-live-coverage#block-26

            The “story” went on from there. NOW, remember that Pam Geller showed that his Facebook page was later changed to say he was Christian. When you’re jailed, they give you one phone call. Do they give you one visit to the Internet so you can update Facebook?

          • http://www.gulindex.no/o/Breivik_Geofarm/994089269

            What do you make of this? This is supposedly the location of his geofarm, whatever the heck that is.

            Found the link there. So did he have a truck farm and sell produce in the city or what? Try to find a definition of geofarm or geo-farm.

            About his “farm”: http://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/detalj.jsp?orgnr=994089269

            Now here’s something interesting. Trying to figure out what geofarming is. Come up with multiple sites that deal with REAL ESTATE. Then I find one in South America that seems to be an ORGANIC farm–no chemicals. Then I find several that deal with Geocaches, meaning that game where people hide things and use GPS to find the cache of stash. Geofarm used multiple times in that context, especially in Northern Europe. But here’s the best:


            Google translate:

            Norwegian – detected to English translation
            You are here: OnlineGuiden.no »Industries» Property »Oslo» Oslo »Breivik Geofarm
            DataMap Map data © 2011 Google – Terms of UseMap DataCloseMap data © 2011 Google

            45 ° label refurbishment Geofarm
            Org.nr: 994 089 269
            Address: Hoffsveien 18, 0275 OSLO
            Mobile: 900 87 334
            Region: Oslo
            E-mail: andersbehring@hotmail.com
            About Breivik Geofarm
            Breivik Geofarm is real estate developer, and is located in Oslo. Our work is in the development and sale of real estate. Contact us on mobile 900 87 334

            About Us · Advertising Solutions · Agreement terms and conditions Vacancies · References · Contact Us

          • About Breivik Geofarm
            Breivik Geofarm is real estate developer, and is located in Oslo. Our work is in the development and sale of real estate. Contact us on mobile 900 87 334

            hummm…real estate….

          • Soundex Code for Breivik = B612
            Other surnames sharing this Soundex Code:

      • Miri, you said above;

        This is all very fishy. Some reports say he was in an (wait for it …) anti-tax, anti-immigration, small-government party. Sound familiar? BUT others say the party he was once in is the second largest in Norway, mainstream, AND is (was?) running in the lead in polls for this next election. Now theNY Times story Bridgette linked says the “liberal government” was the gunman’s target. Or was it? What will happen now? People will likely turn against the minority party, so as not to appear, even in their own minds, as being hateful or anti-immigrant or siding with terrorists. Guess what? The LIBS win again! Fishy to me. I’m sorry. If this liberal government is in charge, and since it was reported to be lax on Islamic terrorism, if this attack happens, then what to do? It surely would take a huge conspiracy to pin it on a Norwegian, but what about that dark-haired guy who got away. Who was he? Think about the political fallout for the libs, losing in polls already, for a successful Al Qaeda attack to happen on this scale.

        What sounds more likely to be true? Think about this. This NY Times story must have, at one point, contained the paragraph Bridgette posted. Go to the link now. IT’S NO LONGER THERE. The authors say the story was changed, but not to remove that paragraph about that group taking credit. The story now talks about the Muslim group, but says they’re not sure it really exists. BUT they don’t say anything about them taking credit. Here’s how it reads now:

        “Initial reports focused on the possibility of Islamic militants, in particular Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or Helpers of the Global Jihad, cited by some analysts as claiming responsibility for the attacks. American officials said the group was previously unknown and might not even exist.”

        Smells is right Miri. See castle info on research post. Maybe someone should ask Bill Ayers too…

  10. First Al Queda was suspected, then the NY Times first stated that Helpers of the Global Jihad issued a statement claiming responsibility for the attack…where did they get that information? Who gave Will McCant the message to translate? Then how did the information disappear and change to Breivik? Is there a retraction by the NY Times or other outlets?

  11. suspect this is Gabrielle Giffords II

    • I agree dave m, and don’t forget Stack’s computer also. Funny how those get written on no ? after the fact too. Stinks bad.

  12. http://www.proff.no/selskap////994089269
    Norwegian to English translation

    Breivik Geofarm

    Org nr 994 089 269. Company information accounting roles and announcements comparison business news NACE industry: 01,130 Growing of vegetables, melons, roots and tubers
    E-mail: anders.behring @ hotmail.com
    Address: Asta East
    2450 Rena
    Official company information
    Legal Name: faxBreivik Geofarm Org no: 994 089 269
    Number of employees: not listed
    Incorporation Date: 18/05/2009
    Address: Asta East
    2450 Rena
    NACE industry:
    01130 Growing of vegetables, melons, roots and tubers

    Request more info
    Breivik Geofarm
    Full company reports for $ 90.00
    Copy certificate of registration £ 45.00
    Role, Business £ 50.00
    Mortgages, Business £ 45.00

    Not in the Wayback Machine; no date on the Google cache. MELONS.

  13. http://w2.brreg.no/kunngjoring/hent_alle.jsp?kid=20110000089801&sokeverdi=994089269

    As of April 2011:
    Company Name: BREIVIK GEOFARM
    Organisation number: 994 089 269
    Business Address: Hoffsveien 18
    0275 OSLO

    County: LONDON
    Form of organization: Sole proprietorships

    New business address: Asta East
    2450 RENA
    Municipality: ÅMOT

    Enterprises 09.04.2011
    New registration

    Name / Company Name: BREIVIK GEOFARM
    Organisation number: 994 089 269
    Business Address: Hoffsveien 18
    0275 OSLO

    County: LONDON
    Form of organization: Sole proprietorships

    Purpose: Purchase, sale and management of shares, project development, including
    acquisition and development of real estate, and participation in other
    companies and businesses, as well as what may be associated

    Owner: Anders Behring Breivik, Hoffsveien 18, 0275 OSLO
    Manager: Anders Behring Breivik
    Enterprises 18.05.2009

    Brønnøysundregistrene · Contact us · firmapost@brreg.no · Phone: 75 00 75 00 · Organization: 974 760 673

  14. Anders Behring Breivik


    Male, born 1979. THAT appears to be the link for the correct “proff” listing for his firm. It appears that he first registered in 2009 and did a change of address in April 2011. Now, I’m not an expert but it almost appears to me as if someone went in and changed the “firm information” that describes the type of business but didn’t go all the way back into the other pages to change it there. It appears that originally, this was a real estate connected company, which makes sense because it’s said he studied marketing AND that the address is in the middle of the city. Note, also, how the email address changes. In the ones that state his business is real estate, the address is andersbehring@ hotmail (split that on purpose). However, on the one that says his business is MELONS, somebody put a period between anders and behring, as in anders.behring @hotmail.

    Now about geofarming and real estate: http://www.geofarmingsystem.com/

    “Dear Real Estate Agent,

    When most real estate professionals start in real estate they are taught that they need to have a “farm”. This farm will produce listings for them every month! Now real estate agents are told that this farm will only produce IF they do the following:

    •Door knock the neighborhood everyday

    •Mail out a postcard or letter monthly

    •Drop an “item of value” at least 4 times a year

    And, even when you do this, most agents are told that you need to waite 5 years before you reall see results!

    This advice is TOTALLY WRONG!

    A good “farm” should generate listings and calls for you EVERY MONTH within the first 90 days that you start your farm. We invite you to discover how to get your Geographic Farm generating at least 2 closed transactions monthly.”

    Farming across the geography for customers, apparently. It’s industry slang, like “cold calling.”

    WTF is going on here?

  15. I got to the site below from Metapedia (alternate Wikipedia). It had some interesting items:

    “Norway: Mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik is anti-racist, pro-homosexual and pro-Israel
    Some comments about the ideological background of the Oslo bomber and Utoya shooter

    If you have a website; please copy this post to your site, before my webhost again shuts me down for too much traffic.

    Anders Behring Breivik – Freemason

    Norwegian sources have identified the man who dressed up as a policeman shot perhaps as many as 80 or more innocent young people on the island of Utoya [Utøya] as the 32 years old Anders Behring Breivik. He is also alleged to stand behind the bomb in Oslo, which so far killed seven people,

    The perpetrator was a regular poster on several Norwegian Internet media, notably the blog document.no, which is run by Hans Rustad1), a former left wing journalist. Hans Rustad is Jewish, and extremely pro-Zionist, and warns against islamization, violence and other problems connected with Muslim immigration. Many regular contributors on that blog naturally more or less share his views.

    They represent an ideology where the importance of ethnicity is played down or dismissed completely, and the need for the preservation of Western cultural and democratic values is commonly used as the substitute key argument against immigration. Their rhetorics and activities are almost completely focused on Islam and Muslims; other immigrant groups such as Vietnamese, Chinese, non Muslim Africans and other groups are routinely painted as ‘harmless’, or even as ‘positive contributors to society’.

    This is the currently most popular strain of the anti-immigration movements in Europe, as represented by Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party, the Danish People’s Party, the Sweden Democrats, and in Germany the so called ‘Pro-movement’, of which Pro-Cologne (Pro-Köln) is one of the most active, as well as several recently new established parties with a similar ideology . In England the EDL is connected to this ideology, together with groups such as SIOE and its local chapters, The Danish Free Press Society and their magazine Sappho, and some others. Note that the SIOE uses the slogan: ‘Racism is the lowest form of stupidity! Islamophobia is the height of common sense’.

    This picture was taken on the island of Utøya the previous day

    Their American allies are people such as Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes, etc. The dedication to the Zionist cause, and their rejection of classical nationalist ideas such as the importance of ethnicity, sets them apart from the sincere nationalist parties such ad the British National Party, Front National (France), Jobbik (Hungary), and NPD (Germany – and the only clearly National Socialist inspired movement of those mentioned).

    Their heroes are mainly Jews such as German Henryk Broder, the French Zionist Bernard Henry Levy, British Melanie Philips, Bernard Lewis, to mention just a few, and many more. The Flemish Nationalists fall somewhere in between, and are mainly traditional Nationalists with no love for the US, Zionism or Israel, who are trying to adapt to a new pro-Zionist image, inspired by the success of Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party in Holland, and the Danish People’s Party in Denmark.

    Terror victims in Oslo

    Members of the pro-Zionist groups and parties often paint their non philosemitic fellow nationalists as Nazis, anti-Semites and racists, copying the rhetorics the left wing PC-brigade uses against themselves, and try to present a more polished image towards the mainstream. They are also much better connected to mainstream politicians than the traditional nationalists, and at times are supported by mainstream newspapers, such as Jyllands-Posten in Denmark, as well as by right wing Jewish groups and individuals. The mainstream press usually judges these groups more favorably then traditional nationalists, who are invariably accused of being ‘Nazis’.

    Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian bomber and gunman also pursued this line of thought:

    Posted on 2009-09-14 10:57:20 as a reaction to post by ‘Caper’


    I didn’t see that the EDL as it is today is what we would have wanted. But it is essential that the intellectual conservative forces (unofficially) offer political and ideological schooling to our youth between 15 and 25. Who else is to do that?

    We cannot despise the young in society and refuse to come closer to them only because they lack ideological training, since it is exactly OUR (culturally conservative intellectuals) responsibility to do so.

    Bawer [referring to homosexual anti-islamist Bruce Bawer] is probably not the right person to work as a bridge builder. He is a liberal anti-Jihadist, and in many ways not a culturally conservative. I have my suspicions about him being TOO paranoid [with reference to his homosexuality). It could seem as though he fears that ‘cultural conservatives’ will become a threat against homosexuals in the future. Therefore he refuses to take his chance to influence them into a positive direction? That seems completely irrational.

    It has to be said that many organizations such as VB [probably referring to the Flemish nationalist party Vlaams Belang] needs to go through many ‘reforms’, before they reach our level.

    Anyway, we are not in a position where we can pick and choose our partners. That’s why we have to ensure that we influence other culturally conservatives to take our anti-racist pro-homosexual, pro-Israeli line of thought. When this direction has been taken we can take it to the next level.

    The consolidation MUST continue, and people must contribute by influencing (in stead of isolating).

    The above was translated from this page, where document.no has collected all posts by Anders Behring Breivik. So far it is not possible to read the seperate comments in the original thread; according to an announcement on the website, they changed IT-systems a few days ago, and are working on bringing the comments and the full posts back online. The URL to the article to which this comment belongs is here; maybe it will work later on.


    1 I dislike Mr. Hans Rustad for at least one reason: He does not support freedom of speech when it comes to WWII history and the holocaust.

    Total deathtoll at this moment 9:00 local Norwegian time: 91

    Ps. Rumors

    There are rumors on the internet that Anders Behring Breivik is identical with the well known conservative blogger Fjordman. This is denied by people who know him personally, and it is alleged that Anders Behring Breivik during some period has presented himself as Fjordman.”

    FROM THIS LINK: http://blog.balder.org/?p=1241

    For what it’s worth, which may not be much. Dueling truths. Metapedia says about him, “Information on his intellectual influences derive from his social-media accounts. On Twitter and Facebook he states his admiration for the liberal-socialist John Stuart Mill, as well as Immanuel Kant and John Locke, the Judaic radical Franz Kafka, anarchist Leo Tolstoy and the socialist George Orwell. Despite these progressive influences and his freemasonic membership, as well as professing admiration for Max Manus, an “anti-fascist resistance fighter”, some media outlets attempted to portray him to the public as a nationalist or a so-called “right-wing extremist”. He also openly professed an interest in violent video-games.”

    Of course, they use as sources the questionable, recently created Twitter and Facebook pages. What’s interesting is that Metapedia reports his education at Oslo Commerce School and says that his company Geofarm employed hundreds of people. Doesn’t sound like a small truck farm to me. Doesn’t sound like a FARM at all.

  16. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-norway-fm-called-for-palestinian-state-at-youth-camp-the-day-before-deadly-rampage/

    “The tragedy in Oslo, Norway has led us to into some not-usually-traveled territory: Norwegian politics. And as we try to get a better understanding of the political climate in the grieving country, here is some of what we are learning.

    The day before Anders Behring Breivik opened fire on youths at a Labor Party camp, organizers welcomed the country’s foreign minister. Now, the foreign minister’s message from that day has been revealed: it was an anti-Israel speech in which he came out in strong support of a Palestinian state. That message was something being supported by the camp’s attendees, who were part of the ruling Labor Party’s socialist youth movement called AUF.

    According to a translated report for Norwegian news station TV2, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store visited the camp on the island of Utoya on Thursday, the day before Breivik opened fire on campers killing over 80 of them.”

  17. (clearing throat here)
    Miri, can you step across the hall for a bit please. It is getting more odd;

    Castle Walls | Wtpotus Research Blog#comment-25479#comment-25479#comment-25479#comment-25479#comment-25479#comment-25479#comme Renee | July 24, 2011 at 3:35 pm | Reply
    Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store

    Soundex Code for Gahr = G600
    Other surnames sharing this Soundex Code:

    Oh Miri……

    • http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-norway-fm-called-for-palestinian-state-at-youth-camp-the-day-before-deadly-rampage/

      Report: Norway FM Called for Palestinian State At Youth Camp the Day Before Deadly Rampage
      July 23, 2011 at 6:06pm by Jonathon M. Seidl

      “Together with the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation correspondent Sidsel Wold and Norwegian People’s Aid Kirsten Belck-Olsen, discussed the Foreign Minister of the deadlock between Israel and the Palestinian Authority,” the Google translation of the article says.

      It continues:

      As foreign minister arrived Utøya he was met with a demand from the AUF that Norway must recognize a Palestinian state.

      – The Palestinians must have their own state, the occupation must end, the wall must be demolished and it must happen now, said the Foreign Minister to cheers from the audience.

      Earlier this week, when Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas visited Norway, the Minister said to TV 2 news channel that Norway stands ready to recognize a Palestinian state. This he repeated during the debate on Utøya.

    • I didn’t even notice that guy’s name. Garh and Gore. That is a weird coincidence. I saw another guy’s name and it appears to be “City”. Now that’s weird, too. Mr. City.

      His middle name is Garh? His first name is Jonas. It should be See.

      See Garh Store. Get it? 🙂

      • City is the surname of Breivik’s lawyer I believe. I thought I named him in the article, but I don’t see it.

        More peculiar things. I found the article where I thought City was mentioned, but now the Lawyer’s name is Geir Lippestad. Yet they don’t show that AP updated the information in their article, Lawyer: Norway suspect wanted a revolution. Will keep looking…

        Found the name of City in a translated article posted above.
        Bridgette | July 24, 2011 at 10:29 am
        says defender Geir Lippe City. Perhaps during translation the name gets changed from Lippestad.

        There is another “Fixed” photo in that article.

        • That makes sense. Lost in translation. Maybe that other guy’s last name isn’t Store. Maybe his name is Jonas Gahr. Period. No See Gahr Store. 🙂

          Why are they posting all these photoshopped images? Why are they removing the background? What was in the background TO remove? Is it only cover for the fact that the entire thing is photoshopped, because they know how people are becoming expert at spotting photoshopped images?

          They’re so careful to point out the photoshopping, but they hide the fact that they changed the stories, rewriting history, without transparently stating what was changed and why. If you want a GOOD belly laugh, read this op-ed by Leonard Pitts:


          Referring to Murdoch and hackergate, he writes, “All these skeins to unravel, yet your humble correspondent feels himself stuck at square one, unable to get beyond the simplest and most basic wrong of all the wrongs here: Journalists are not supposed to do these kinds of things. I feel unbearably credulous in saying that, but it needs saying. Yes, I get that nobody should do these kinds of things. But the point is, journalists are theoretically guided by certain ethical strictures. One avoids conflicts of interest. One does not plagiarize. One does not buy information. And one does not hack the voice mail of a missing child. Indeed, one abides by a litany of constraints, which, while they may sometimes compromise expedience, one accepts because they also protect integrity.”

          INTEGRITY? ROFLMAO. This man talks about integrity! He excoriates the one reporter who is ALLEGED to have listened to voice mail (unpassword protected, btw) and tars 53,000 people who work for Murdoch with the same brush. BUT WHERE WAS HIS OUTRAGE OVER THE “CONFLICT OF INTEREST” CALLED JOURNO-LIST? What about the conflict of interest we see on a daily basis when news is reported by the likes of “journalists” who are married to political insiders? Look at the lamestream broadcast networks and the number of “journalists” with such conflicts is ridiculous. Journalists avoid conflicts of interest. RIGHT, Leonard. Oh, you. What a card!

          • btw, they say this manifesto was on the Web but there’s nothing out there prior to the day of the attack. Nothing.

      • Miri, It seems alot of names are cities. Remember when Newssleuth mentioned that last year ? The people name themselves of where the come from as well as occupations.



    Norway Suspect’s Manifesto: Wanted Anti-Muslim Crusade, ‘Enablers of Islamization’ Would be Punished for ‘Treasonous Acts’
    July 24, 2011 at 8:53am by Madeleine

    EDS NOTE: IMAGE HAS BEEN DIGITALLY ALTERED BY THE ORIGINAL SOURCE TO REMOVE THE BACKGROUND – This image shows Anders Behring Breivik from a 1,500-page manifesto attributed to him that was discovered Saturday, July 23, 2011. Breivik is a suspect in a bombing in Oslo and a shooting on a nearby island which occurred on Friday, July 22, 2011. The document, which contained this and other photos, also described how to acquire explosives. (AP Photo/via Scanpix)

    UPDATE: View the video Breivik is believed to have posted just before the attacks here.

    OSLO, Norway (AP) — The man blamed for attacks on Norway’s government headquarters and a youth retreat that left at least 92 dead said he was motivated by a desire to bring about a revolution in Norwegian society, his lawyer said Sunday. A manifesto that he is believed to have written ranted against Muslim immigration to Europe and vowed revenge on “indigenous Europeans” who he accused of betraying their heritage.

    Although the lawyer for the 32-year-old Norwegian suspect, Anders Behring Breivik, said his client acted alone, police conducted raids on a garage and sheds in an industrial neighborhood of eastern Oslo, said police officer Kjell Bjerklund.

    Survivors of the mass shooting on Utoya island that killed at least 85 young people reported seeing two assailants, and police have said they were looking into those accounts and had not ruled out a second suspect. Another seven people were killed in Friday’s bombing in an Oslo government building.

    • Another altered photograph of Breivik! Check out his hand. Why are they having to alter and change photos of this guy. Did they put his head on the body like they do with all of Obama’s family photos? What could possibly be in the background that would be bad for the public to see?

      • Ok. Now I lost wherever this link came from. I thought here, but you never know. I don’t see it on this page. Anyway, look at this again (if you did before). I clicked the link and hours later finally got around to reading it. It’s pretty powerful: http://obamafake.blogspot.com/2011/07/obamas-forged-birth-certificate-and.html

        A history of political “photoshopping”, most of it done by (other) tyrants.

        I quickly skimmed his “manifesto” and the thing seems to start out logical and sensible. Not violent and then at the end has the bomb making stuff, etc. At the very end are all those photoshopped pics PLUS what looks to me like a wedding photo of him, a bride, somebody’s mother. They say he lives with his mom. That Metapedia page says he’s “pro-homosexual” so reading between the lines (and looking at him) I thought maybe . . .

        I wonder if this man did write part of the 1500 pages and then it got hijacked, rigged up, and reposted on the Web as his work? It’s suspicious that it appears where it does and gets scrubbed from other places.

        • I wonder if this man did write part of the 1500 pages and then it got hijacked, rigged up, and reposted on the Web as his work? It’s suspicious that it appears where it does and gets scrubbed from other places.

          Yes-suspicious is right…from start to finish-and the names Miri ! This is all just too strange.

      • I really do think they’re photoshopping a la the Obama fab family. It’s too bizarre for words.

  19. I didn’t watch the entire video but if anybody expects any proof in the video that this supposed perp made it or posted it, they’ll be disappointed. It’s like a slide show. If anybody watches the entire 12 minutes, please let us know if anywhere in the video the perp appears (in motion, not in stills). Okay?

    btw, somebody said that Free Republic was cited as a source in his manifesto. Another reason why my radar is going off. (See my comment above about them trying to tie the Holocaust shooter to Free Republic, too.)

    While we’re talking about Free Republic, they have a post that alleges that Breivik just copied verbatim parts of the Unabomber’s treatise, some of which came from Al Gore. See comment 19. The truth in that instance was scrubbed, too–that the Unabomber devoured Gore’s book, underlining key parts, and had it in his shack. So the beat goes on.

    • Oh Miri, Again and again ?

      Castle Walls


      Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Store

      Oh Miri……

    • btw, somebody said that Free Republic was cited as a source in his manifesto.

      Miri, Of course ! Don’t you know that all the people of Norway read Free Republic ?
      Yeah ok. What a crock.

      • Apparently they say Pam Geller is mentioned in his manifesto, too, which makes it that much more suspicious. Pam is not amused and as usual, lays them out:

        “It is almost inconceivable that one passing reference in a 1,516-page screed would be sufficient for the Islamic/leftist machine to assign blame to yours truly, and to those of us who are working diligently to educate the people. It’s extraordinary that this is being swallowed whole by the mainstream media. It’s extraordinary that we experience thwarted plots, acts of jihad on a weekly and sometimes daily basis, without the mainstream media ever referring to the very ideology that inspires, commands, and prescribes such violence. But the left wing alternative media is madly running with this.

        We’re still waiting for the Department of Defense to speak to the religious motivation in the Fort Hood jihad. And yet here we are with a mass murderer who has been planning this for nine years, long before I ever heard of a blog, and who sought to use us, to use our work as a basis for his maniacal, homicidal rampage — and we are held responsible. Notice that no attention is being paid to last week’s jihad attack in Mumbai. Is it because it’s Islam, and the media is Sharia-compliant? Is it because it’s brown people? Are we going to go there? That’s what the left would say if conservatives were not paying sufficient attention to murders in a non-Western country.

        There is only a single and insignificant reference to me in Breivik’s manifesto. The 55 references to Spencer are mostly quotes from Muslim scriptures. But Breivik cites LGF numerous times, in a very different way. He includes a long diatribe against Charles Johnson, whom he clearly admired until he felt betrayed enough to snap. The killer speaks about Charles Johnson obsessively and wrings his hands about Johnson’s turn to the left. Could this perhaps have been the provocation? Could this have been what caused him to snap?

        Breivik also refers favorably to Obama. Does that make the president culpable as well?
        This whole exercise is ridiculous. Anders Behring Breivik is responsible for his actions. If anyone incited him to violence, it was Islamic supremacists. If anything incited him to violence, it was the Euro-Med policy.”

        The manifesto speaks favorably about OBAMA? Bet you don’t hear that on MSNBC. 🙂

        • http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/07/murderers-manifesto.html

          Another by the great Pam Geller:

          “The parsing of the writings and conversations of the Norway shooter begins. He is a murderer, a mass murderer. Period. He’s not anything else. He is sick, sick to death and he has aided the enemy in so many ways it defies comprehension. Anyone who would kill children is insane. And if he’s a right winger who hates Muslims, how does that translate into killing a bunch of political youth party Workers’ Youth League?

          According to this report, he started planning this attack nine years ago. I wasn’t blogging back then.

          I despise savagery and inhumanity in any all instances. Period. This abject loser lowered himself to sub-human status. And he has done this wholly on his own. Nowhere does Christianity or the counter jihad movement call for violence of any kind. Whatever he says doesn’t square. He’s a bloody murderer. Period. He is responsible for his actions. He and only he. There was no “ideology” here. No mandate for murder, and all the leftists, Islamic apologists and Islamic supremacists and media hounds won’t make it so. Watching CNN and BBC coverage about Norway, I found very disturbing to hear the number of times they use the word “Christian.” They would never dare refer to religion when it is jihad, and this attack had nothing to do with Christianity. It is outrageous.”

          It is, indeed, outrageous. We don’t hear about the color of the skin, eyes, or hair of the Mumbai murderers. We don’t hear their religion, ISLAM, constantly repeated and tied to atrocity. Instead, we see scrub-a-dub-dubbing of claims of credit for the atrocity by MUSLIMS. Why? They supposedly didn’t do it.

          Will the lamestream report this story ad nauseum? They should:


          Yes, the Taliban murdered by hanging an 8-year-old child. Did they have dark hair, eyes, and skin? Why, yes they did.

    • Interesting that someone at Free took the time to translate the manifesto (was it written in English?) and was able to find so many duplicate, plagiarized pages from the Unibomber’s.

      Someone there even suggested that this guy is made-up or a fictional person. It sure is beginning to look that way..except he has a lawyer who is speaking FOR HIM, but saying nothing.

      • Fake. A paper doll like person with made up info inserted. Too many names from this side of the pond. Like someone exposing the names and connections. Like in the fake bc’s. It is the same kind of thing again. Another cut and paste story.

        • Funny you should mention paper dolls, Renee. That’s exactly what I thought when I saw those photos that the lamestream media put out. He looks like a paper Ken doll that some kid is putting different outfits on. They admit they photoshopped, so what ELSE did they photoshop?

          He was brought to court but the public AND the media were banned. He’s going into 8 weeks of confinement, the first 4 solitary with no outside contact. They claim they don’t want to give his views a forum. So does that mean the public will NEVER get to see and hear him? The media caught a glimpse of him in a red outfit, in the back of a car. He seemed to be smiling, a la Loughner. A loon, too.

          Here’s an interesting factoid: His father was a Norwegian diplomat, who apparently lives in a luxury villa in France:

          “My colleague Kim Willsher, who is looking at developments in France, reports that police there are protecting Breivik’s father and not searching his house, as previously thought:

          French gendarmes have denied carrying out a search at the home of Breivik’s estranged father.

          Local officials said gendarmes had been sent to the luxury villa in the village of Cournanel in the Aude to protect retired diplomat Jens Breivik and his Norwegian wife Wanda.

          Antoine Leroy, state prosecutor at Carcassonne, said the officers were there in a “preventative role”.

          “There is no specific evidence to make us believe there is the slightest threat against this man, but it is prevention. There have been rumours of searches, but this is wrong. There has been no legal action at Cournanel,” Leroy told French journalists.

          The gendarmes have said they are expecting to be posted to guard the Breivik house for some time. Leroy confirmed reports that members of the French Foreign Legion had been seen outside the villa on Sunday, but said this was because a Legionnaire was acting as a translator between the couple and gendarmes.

          In an interview published in the Norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang on Sunday, Jens Breivik said he was in a state of shock after hearing the reports of the massacre on Friday. He said he had not seen his son for years and had only discovered what he had done from reports on the internet.

          He has since refused to answer questions from journalists outside his home. His wife Wanda, who reporters said does not appear to speak French, said in Norwegian that she had never met her stepson.”

          That link continues the timeline for the case and also says that they were mistaken on the number killed and will be changing the number downward later today. Is this in response to the logical question about how a LONE gunman can kill so many when the island reportedly had 700 people on it?

          btw, predictably, the lamestream is using this to tout gun control, when logically, it’s a HUGE ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF GUN RIGHTS AND CONCEALED CARRY.

          When you have an unarmed populace, what do you have? 700 sitting ducks, waiting to be picked off. HAD anyone there, including the lone security guard, been ARMED, then the death toll would be much, much lower. That is beyond doubt.

          This is what the progressives want–a populace completely at the mercy of whomever carries the guns. In their ideal world, those would be ONLY the “authorities” that the elites control.

          It’s not a coincidence that the first thing tyrants do (Hitler, e.g.) is to DISARM the populace. Thus, OUR SECOND AMENDMENT.

          From that same article: “Mark Townsend tweets the extraordinary reaction of the Norwegians he’s spoken to: One striking aspect is that of dozens of locals, including survivors from island, I’ve met not one has condemned Breivik. Tolerance prevails.”

          Some might say stupidity prevails.

          And yet the same story says that crowds in Oslo were present to scream at Breivik and call for his death.

      • He sure does sound like a fictional person. We don’t even know what kind of company he ran. They say it was a melon farm but it was in the middle of the city AND the sites in the Wayback Machine say it was a real estate company, which fits better with his degree in MARKETING. There’s so much disinformation going on. What kind of lawyer says the type of stuff his lawyer says to the media? What kind of defense is he going to get?

        • Melon ? ROTFL ! too much freaky going on Miri. I agree. I will ask Bunny Mellon to tea. Maybe she can help us with the melon part….This is just too over the top.

        • The story just morphs as people point out the discrepancies. Now they say that there was a security guard at the camp, but he was the first killed. They say the perp used “marketing” to sell his manifesto. They say he set up FAKE companies. They say he RENTED a farm to use as cover for the purchase of the fertilizer. Now they say the authorities won’t say whether or not he was on their radar before the event. This is all CYA at this point. It’s so like a Jon Lovitz skit–“Yeah, that’s the ticket.” http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/article_f5e6678d-8d3a-5008-ad3d-9bc1907db7c1.html

  20. I have not read this informaiton yet, but it looks to be different that what we have seen so far. I’m posting the links below.

    Terrorist proclaimed himself ‘Darwinian,’ not ‘Christian’

    Norwegian’s manifesto shows Breivik not religious, having no personal faith

    Read more: Terrorist proclaimed himself ‘Darwinian,’ not ‘Christian’ http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=325765#ixzz1T5KVHAwY

    Norway’s terrorist: Not alone after all?

    International effort widens net in search of possible suspects

    Read more: Norway’s terrorist: Not alone after all? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=325737#ixzz1T5Kt2tK7

    Norway shooter considered WMD, jihadi alliance

    ‘We want control of our own countries in Western Europe’

    Read more: Norway shooter considered WMD, jihadi alliance http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=325769#ixzz1T5LAytkw

    • I heard that he was supposedly baptized Lutheran, but didn’t practice the faith. A Darwinian would be an atheist, basically. Sounds like a typical northern European, imho. I have friends from there and they’re actually EMBARRASSED to give any hint to anyone that they even might believe in a Higher Power. Common wisdom over there is the typical progressive bull–that it’s just superstitious mumbo-jumbo that intelligent people disavow. And they do so love to think they’re more intelligent than we rubes who cling to guns and religion.

      It’s been reported that more than one person said there was another gunman–a guy with dark hair and not wearing any semblance of a uniform. I have my doubts about whether that “manifesto” has any connection to this event. Things are really getting crazy. Now people are blaming Mossad because people at that camp, the day before, were calling for the UN to recognize Palestine as an independent state. I trust none of this stuff. We will probably never learn the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

  21. Exclusive: The Oslo Terrorist in His Own Words: Bomber Predicted “Europe soon will burn once again”
    July 23,2011


    • Do you notice that what he wrote against is “cultural COMMUNISM” not “cultural Marxism”? At least in that article.

      Doesn’t all of that sound REASONABLE? I see nothing in there that predicts violence or any reason why this man should have been under surveillance as a potential domestic terrorist. I do notice that the source is anonymous. A person who claimed to have corresponded with Breivik in 2009, via Facebook. BUT his Facebook page is recent, with no friends. Where did the other page go, so that people can see the history?

      His manifesto is mentioned in the correspondence to the anonymous source. What we don’t know, however, is whether or not the manifesto he wrote is what we now see on the Web. This guy writes like a person who doesn’t need to plagiarize from a US terrorist. However, the manifesto contains copied paragraphs from Kaczynski’s screed, COMPLETE WITH TYPOS AND GRAMMATICAL ERRORS. But in the correspondence, Breivik wrote very well and surely, while he modified the plagiarized parts, he would have corrected the errors, don’t you think? But a progressive hacker/partisan might not do so, if he was modifying Breivik’s manifesto to fit the meme that Breivik was a domestic terrorist in the making.

      On cue, of course, lamestream media are decrying how the Internet and blogs help radicalize these guys. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jul/25/anders-behring-breivik-norway-extremists

      “There is a reason why the Norwegian police have not been overly concerned with rightwing extremism in recent years. It is plainly not very visible. An estimated 40 Norwegians currently belong to self-proclaimed extreme rightwing groups.

      However, anyone familiar with the darker waters of the blogosphere would for years have been aware of the existence of a vibrant cyberscene characterised by unmitigated hatred of the new Europe, aggressive denunciations of the “corrupted, multiculturalist power elites” and pejorative generalisations about immigrants, targeting Muslims in particular.”

      Funny you never hear them complain about the TV shows or Islamic blogs that help radicalize Muslims.

      More: “What the denizens of this blogosphere have in common is, first and foremost, a resentment of the defenders of diversity. These “elite” are often described as “traitors”, “sellouts” or just “naive multiculturalists”. They also share the conviction that Islam is incompatible with the democratic values of the west. This view is problematic in a country where the Muslim population is over 150,000 and growing. Nobody knows how widespread such views are, but they can no longer be written off as harmless.”

      So any person who holds the RATIONAL, LOGICAL VIEW that Islam is INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE DEMOCRATIC VALUES OF THE WEST, because by definition it IS INCOMPATIBLE–why, that person holds a harmful view. So what’s the answer? Orwellian mind wipe? No he calls for more investigation into these “networks.”

      Then he says, “King Haakon VII, who reigned from 1905 to 1957, famously said that he was “the king of the communists, too”. King Harald V could hardly do better, in the current situation, than pointing out that he is “the king of Norwegian Muslims, Sikhs, Jews and Hindus, too”. Perhaps it goes without saying, yet a statement of this kind would cleanse the air in a situation where extreme xenophobia and religious prejudice have been the source of inspiration for unspeakably atrocious acts.”

      Unspeakably atrocious acts like hanging an 8-year old boy, incinerating 3000 innocent workers in the World Trade Center, blowing up airplanes, hotels, and buildings across the globe? Can you imagine any lamestream media “journalist” writing this: Extreme ISLAMIC “xenophobia and religious prejudice have been the source of inspiration for unspeakably atrocious acts?” They would never dare.

      Here’s THE MOST FRIGHTENING paragraph that should send chills up your spine:

      “Breivik must willingly have allowed himself to be brainwashed by Islamophobic and extreme rightwing websites. However, had he instead been forced to receive his information through a broadsheet newspaper, where not all the stories dealt with Europe’s loss of confidence and the rise of militant Islam, it is conceivable that his world would have looked slightly different. Perhaps one lesson from this weekend of shock and disbelief may be that cultural pluralism is not necessarily a threat to national cohesion, but that the tunnel vision resulting from selective perusal of the internet is.” FORCED TO RECIEVE HIS INFORMATION from [PROGRESSIVE] newspapers that promote “cultural pluralism”? FORCED TO?!!!! And he calls “willingly” reading other views to be BRAINWASHING. Orwellian. And scary.

      Another guy wrote, “Governments across Europe will be re-directing their intelligence agencies to give an assessment.” OF the threat of home-grown domestic right-wing terrorists, he means. REDIRECTING intelligence agencies against non-Muslims. Just what the jihadists want. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14274387

  22. More from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/25/norway-attack-live-coverage-anders-breivik

    “Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s stepbrother was among 86 killed on Nyota Island. It seems he was the off-duty police officer placed on the island to guard the children. … A little more on Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s stepbrother, who was among those killed on Utøya. A court spokeswoman has told AP that his name was Trond Berntsen, and that he was the son of Mette-Marit’s stepfather, who died in 2008.”

  23. More from that timeline link, which is continually updated, most recent news at the top:

    “According to Sky, a Norwegian newspaper has reported that Breivik has been on an intelligence watchlist since March this year.” [Changing that tune, too. CYA]

    “Associated press is reporting that police have lowered the death toll in the youth camp massacre outside the Norwegian capital to 68, down from 86.” So the total from both attacks is 76, not 93.

    Here he is:

  24. It appears that Melanie Phillips’s webpage is down, probably a victim of hackers because this Daily Mail columnist was cited in Breivik’s manifesto, like Pam Geller and Free Republic. btw, Pam has a good article about that Pakistani “lobbyist” recently arrested in DC: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/07/two-charged-with-running-pakistani-front-in-dc.html

  25. http://web.orange.co.uk/article/news/gunman_s_father_was_london_diplomat

    Background on his father. Wikipedia has more about Breivik’s life, too. Sounds a LOT like Barry’s. Father left when he was young. Mother a feminist. Both parents married and divorced more than once. Bunch of step and half siblings. Visited/lived in London. Interesting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_Breivik

    • Notice that Wikipedia links to that company directory (footnote 30) which contains the page they FORGOT to modify to make it appear to be a melon farm. http://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/detalj.jsp?orgnr=994089269

      This is the source of the information that he had 790 employees. However, if you click the link from that page that reads, “kunngjoringer”, it goes to another page. There you can click other links that say it’s a REAL ESTATE company. For example, the last link, that contains the word “kunngjoringene”, says “Purchase, sale and management of shares, project development, including acquisition and development of real estate, and participation in other companies and businesses, as well as what may be associated.”

      The very first link on that page says nothing about the type of company. The second link contains the same paragraph as above, about real estate.

      I pointed out yesterday how the page that says it’s a “melon farm” also contains an email address that’s subtley different from other company/people searches: Containing a period between the name Anders and Behring (his mother’s maiden name, btw). So that front page appears to have been modified. There’s nothing for that page in the WayBack Machine OR in Google cache, except what appears today.

  26. Somewhere in that story about his father, they report that Anders felt that his mother’s feminism caused he, himself, to become “feminised.” Again, interesting.

  27. What a crock from word one.

    God, bless the People. Give them strength. Comfort.

    Let them not be pawns.


  28. An interesting analysis based on Breivik’s written document

    Norway’s Amazing Pro-gay, Pro-choice, Anti-racist, Masonic, Big Government, Zionist, Agnostic, Breakdancing, “Conservative Christian” Terrorist!
    July 25

    Anders Behring Breivik appears to be precisely the white conservative the Department of Homeland Security has spent two years warning us is the “most likely source of terrorism” in the United States. There’s just one problem: Breivik states he does “not necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ or God,” questions “[i]f there is a God,” defines Christianity as as a cultural construct to oppose Islam, favors a “secular” society, supports abortion in many circumstances, describes himself as “pro-homosexual” and “pro-Israeli,” wants to transfer child-rearing from the family to the government, hates Adolf Hitler, belongs to the Freemasons, supports a “New World Order,” wants to rebuild the Jerusalem Temple…and has a soft spot for breakdancing.

    As he was about to unleash his deadly assault, Anders Behring Breivik released his 1,500-word manifesto 2083 — A European Declaration of Independence under the pen name Andrew Berwick. Unlike many of the mass media “journalists,” this author has read nearly all of it. It paints a picture of Breivik that shatters the mainstream media template of an angry Christian yokel.


  29. Islamic Conspiracy New Strategy : From 9/11 To Huma Abedin To Oslo
    25 July 2011

    “Speaking the Truth in Times of Universal Deceit is a Revolutionary Act.” George Orwell
    After almost 10 years, do we really remember 9/11?

    Oslo happened on 22/7/11 or 11/11 ……..

    There seems to be a concerted worldwide conspiracy by complacent governments and main stream media, to pull our attention from horrors in the face of terrorism coming from the Muslim world.


    • They’re talking in Norway about Breivik being declared insane, never to stand trial, to be locke up. From where the people will never hear him speak in his own voice about his supposed “crusade.” Is he a real person? Or a willing dupe? This is so like with Loughner. Have we yet heard him speak? Nope, locked up, incommunicado, and they fight giving him the drugs to help him become sane enough to stand trial. Convenient.

    • From above article: Let’s take a look at the timeline of Norway’s twin attacks, prepared by Associated Press, according to police and eyewitnesses:

      3:26 p.m.: A car bomb explodes outside the prime minister’s office in central Oslo.

      —Around 4:50 p.m.: Vacationers at a campground begin to hear shooting across the lake on Utoya, an island where the youth wing of the Labor Party is being held.

      5:38 p.m.: SWAT team is dispatched from Oslo. It drives, deciding that starting a police helicopter would take longer.

      —By 6 p.m.: The team arrives at the lake, but it struggles to find a boat to cross over.

      6:20 p.m.: The SWAT team arrives on the island.

      So, basically it took 3 long hours for the Norwegian SWAT team to take control of the situation, after over 90 dead…?

      She suggests that this was really a Muslim inspired attack made to “look like” and have it blamed on right wing or Christian terrorists. Still no one has said why Muslim terrorists originally took responsibility for these tragedies and now aren’t mentioned. The attacks have all the fingerprints of Islamic terrorists.

      • Thanks for that, Bridgette. I was looking for that article and lost it. Isn’t it suspicious that somehow he got out of the downtown (being evacuated) in late afternoon, somehow drove all the way on rural roads to that ferry landing, persuaded the ferryman to take him across, and starting shooting within less than an 84 minutes? It took SWAT 22 minutes to arrive at the ferry, but we must assume they had lights and sirens going, so probably drove a LOT faster than the perp. Then it took them 20 more minutes to get to the island. What took them 48 minutes to simply decide to deploy? If people hadn’t claimed that they saw him downtown, then they could surmise that he had timers on the bombs and that’s how he could be at the island. But one story I read today says that he left the downtown before the blasts, and that the blasts were meant to tie everybody up so he could achieve his main goal at the island. Some stories say that the prime minister was his target, but he wasn’t even there. Others say it was some female politician, whose name I don’t recall.

        That must be the story I read yesterday that suggested it was Islamic terror all along. And no doubt the leftist government, falling down on the job, would prefer to go along with the ploy of blaming it on a home-grown Christian terrorist. And now we won’t be hearing from Breivik himself.

  30. More discrepancies coming out about this attack. NOW they report that the police arrived on the island by boat! Not helicopter. One report says that the helicopter was unavailable because someone was on vacation; another said they just decided it would be quicker to drive than to start up the helicopter (but news helicopters got there pronto).

    It’s still unclear whether they drove to the ferry and then took boats, or what. They commandeered civilian boats, one of which broke down on the way to the island. The first reports were that people called to report gunshots a little after 5. Now the cops are saying it was almost 5:30.

    News reports continue to refer to him as a self-described Christian, but this is based upon a Facebook page that was changed AFTER he was arrested and a manifesto that nobody knows whether or not it was modified to suit that meme, too.

    Supposedly, the police arrested one of the hackers in the Lulzsec/Anonymous/Wikileaks orbit. A 17-year-old kid in the UK. My guess is these guys would be capable of modifying the Facebook page, the manifesto, and the business directory websites. Some suggest that Breivik is a taqiyya plant, a Muslim convert, radicalized to jihad, in order to stage a “Christian” attack to turn the focus onto “domestic terrorism” and away from Islamic terrorism. They cite the victims as proof, saying that if Breivik truly hated Muslims, then why attack white kids instead of Muslims?

    That makes sense. Think about it: If he really wanted to stop the left from sympathizing with Muslims in a misguided attempt to be multicultural, then wouldn’t he more likely stage a bogus Al Qaeda attack and set it up to blame Islamic radicals? How does doing what he did accomplish his so-called goals? It doesn’t. All it’s done is gin up sympathy for Muslims and make the Norwegians more sensitive and “multicultural.” It doesn’t make sense.

  31. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/07/summer-camp-indoctrination-training-center.html

    An amazing expose of just how far left that “summer camp” was. They had faux training exercises imitating the break-the-Gaza-blockade flotilla. This in NO WAY justifies Breivik’s actions (if indeed he did this) but it’s important to know all the players in this tragedy. I can’t imagine any progressive, no matter how corrupt, planning such an attack as a false flag operation; but Islamic jihadists have no such qualms about wasting the lives of infidels. It would be quite a taqiyya coup for them. Harden the foolish progressives against those who rightly, sanely, and logically question the wisdom of absorbing into their population a huge population of non-Norwegians who have NO INTEREST in assimilating, while at the same time, attacking infidels.

  32. Pam wrote,

    “In an interesting article Breivik and totalitarian democrats in which Sevje, the Norwegian ambassador to Israel is quoted:

    “Ma’ariv asked Sevje whether in the wake of Breivik’s terrorist attack Norwegians would be more sympathetic to the victimization of innocent Israelis by Palestinian terrorists.

    Sevje said no, and explained, “We Norwegians view the occupation as the reason for terror against Israel. Many Norwegians still see the occupation as the reason for attacks against Israel. Whoever thinks this way, will not change his mind as a result of the attack in Oslo.”

    The author of the article notes:

    So in the mind of the illiberal Norwegians [the Labour Party], terrorism is justified if the ideology behind it is considered justified.

    For them it is unacceptable for Breivik to murder Norwegian children, because his ideology is wrong. But it is acceptable for Palestinians to murder Israeli children, because their ideology is right.””

    Glenn Beck apparently compared these summer camps to “red diaper baby” summer camps and “youth for Hitler” camps, on account of the obvious anti-Semitism of Norwegians. Long-standing, I might add. Anti-Semitism was and still is rife in Europe, as our brave greatest generation learned over 60 years ago and as we continue to see today. One wonders if the Europeans would have cared if Hitler had NOT tried to subjugate them, too? I mean, would they have been happy to co-exist with a demon like Hitler, had he simply done his thing in Germany? Considering the horror of the Holocaust, one can cut Pam quite a bit of slack for being what leftist might spin as “hypersensitive.” They have every right and they’re completely right to say, “NEVER AGAIN.” As should everyone who stood against the horrors of Hitler, then and now.

  33. Lawyer: Norwegian attacker makes demands
    Aug. 2 Snips

    OSLO, Norway (AP) — The confessed killer in Norway’s twin terror attacks that claimed 77 lives has presented a long list of “unrealistic” demands, including the resignation of the government and that his mental condition be investigated by Japanese specialists, his defense lawyer said Tuesday.

    Geir Lippestad told the Associated Press his client has two lists of demands. One consists of requests common among inmates such as for cigarettes and civilian clothing. The other is “unrealistic, far, far from the real world and shows he doesn’t know how society works,” Lippestad said by telephone.

    Lippestad said 32-year-old Anders Behring Breivik links this second list to his willingness to share information about two other alleged terrorist cells that Breivik has mentioned during questioning.

    “They are completely impossible to fulfill,” Lippestad said, adding that although Breivik has agreed to be examined by local psychiatrists, he also wants to be investigated by Japanese specialists. He claims the Japanese understand the idea and values of honor and that a Japanese (specialist) would understand him a lot better than any European would.”

    Lippestad said his client has also demanded complete political reform, in which he wants to be assigned a key role.

    “His demands here includes the complete overthrowing of both the Norwegian and European societies,” he said, noting it includes the resignation of the Norwegian government but declined to give further details. “But it shows that he doesn’t understand the situation he’s in.” Breivik claims he carried out the attacks as part of a network of modern-day crusaders — the Knights Templar — to launch a revolution against a Europe spoiled by Muslim immigration, and that there are other cells ready to strike.


  34. Did Nowegian Mass Murderer Anders Breivik Undergo Military Training in Belarus [Russia]?
    August 2, 2011 – 12:09 am EST

    Every major news story coming out of the countries of the former Soviet Union should be viewed as possible deliberately crafted disinformation. This highly inflammatory story should be treated with the utmost caution. If it is true, or even partially true, it places a whole new significance on the Norwegian Massacre story.

    From Russia’s Novosti
    Norway’s twin terror suspect Anders Behring Breivik trained at a secret paramilitary field camp in Belarus earlier this year, a Belarusian opposition politician said on Thursday, citing security sources. “Breivik visited Belarus several times. This spring, as part of his preparations for his twin attacks, he visited Minsk, where he underwent training at a secret paramilitary field camp,” Mikhail Reshetnikov, the head of the opposition Belarusian Party of Patriots, told the Gazeta.ru online newspaper.

    He cited sources within Belarus’s “security organs.”

    Please do not treat this Novosti report as reliable. I post it as an interesting angle, possibly true, or partially true. No more than that. Trevor.


    • Nothing would surprise me because there’s something extremely fishy about that whole event–how it happened, how it played out, how Breivik is kept under wraps, and especially his Facebook page changing AFTER he’s in custody.

  35. http://news.yahoo.com/norway-special-police-unit-probe-massacre-case-122353638.html

    The Norwegians seem to finally be wising up. They’re going to see if he was a lone wolf or not. Who financed him, they want to know.

  36. Norway attacker back on island for reconstruction
    Associated Press Sun, Aug 14, 2011 Snips

    OSLO, Norway (AP) — Restrained by a police harness, the Norwegian man who confessed to killing 69 people at an island youth camp reconstructed his actions for police in a secret daylong trip back to the crime scene.

    Police said Sunday they took Anders Behring Breivik back to the island of Utoya for a Saturday hearing about the July 22 terror attacks, when Breivik shot the victims dead on the lake island near Oslo after killing another eight people in the capital with a bomb.

    The 32-year-old described the killings in close detail during an eight-hour tour on the island with up to a dozen police, prosecutor Paal-Fredrik Hjort Kraby told a press conference in Oslo.

    The prosecutor also confirmed Norwegian media reports that police received several phone calls during the terror attack that were probably from Breivik himself, but wouldn’t say how police had reacted to the calls. According to Norwegian daily Aftenposten, Breivik offered to surrender several times and asked police to call him back, but they didn’t.


  37. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/norway/9195351/Norway-massacre-gunman-Anders-Behring-Breivik-not-insane.html

    A new examination says that Breivik is not insane. “The conclusions of the second psychiatric evaluation, which was ordered by an Oslo court amid an outcry over the initial exam findings, were published just six days before the Breivik’s trial is set to start.

    In the end however, it will be up to the Oslo court judges to determine his mental state when they publish their verdict around mid-July, thus deciding whether he will be locked up in a closed psychiatric ward or sent to prison.”

  38. Norway jails “sane” Breivik for maximum term
    By Balazs Koranyi
    August 24, 2012 Snips

    OSLO (Reuters) – Norwegian mass killer Anders Behring Breivik was jailed for a maximum term on Friday when judges declared him sane enough to answer for the murder of 77 people last year, drawing a smirk of triumph from the self-styled warrior against Islam.

    An unrepentant Breivik, 33, gave the Oslo court a stiff-armed, clench-fisted salute before being handed the steepest possible penalty, 21 years. His release, however, can be put off indefinitely should he still pose a threat to a liberal society left traumatized by his bomb and shooting rampage last July.

    Breivik, who had surrendered to police on the island without a fight, admitted blowing up the Oslo government headquarters with a fertilizer bomb, killing eight, on Friday, July 22, 2011, then shooting 69 at the ruling party’s summer youth camp. [Isn’t this so similar to the Colorado shooting – the guy giving up without a fight?]

    Breivik will now be kept in isolation inside Ila Prison on the outskirts of Oslo inside relatively spacious quarters that include a separate exercise room, a computer and a television.

    He had described an insane verdict as “a fate worse than death”. Were he to have been found insane and decided to appeal, the entire trial would have had to be repeated.

    Breivik justified his killing spree arguing that the centre-left Labour party is deliberately destroying the nation by encouraging Muslim immigration.

    Although his victims were mostly teenagers, with some as young as 14, he rejected being called a child murderer, arguing that his victims were brainwashed “cultural Marxists” whose political activism would adulterate pure Norwegian blood.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s