Obama’s House of Cards is Collapsing!

© Bridgette WTPOTUS 2011

Card by Card by Card  …

Obama's House of Cards

We recently reviewed Obama’s multiple Social  Security numbers that investigators uncovered  in the article “Whose Identity Did Obama Steal?”.   Additionally,  they found that he used different social security numbers within a couple of years of each other.  Investigators associated social security numbers with addresses where he lived across the United States,  and where he didn’t live.   His  most flagrant use  of a card  is one that wasn’t issued to him and that he is using today.   Orly Taitz has uncovered new information that adds even more evidence proving  Obama’s family, history,  and  integrity are seriously fraudulent.  Lies about family associations, friends, college, travels, and work are being exposed with rapidity.   The cards in question include his  social security  card,  selective service card, and even his student report card!   Evidence is mounting that his life is one of deceit, lies, and more lies.

Recent revelations are highlighted in Orly Taitz’s First Amended Complaint that was just filed.     Below are the explosive allegations that were added to her amended lawsuit as well as the evidence to back up her allegations.   (The entire lawsuit is available here).

Now it appears Obama lied about his attendance at Columbia!  He was only there for 9 months NOT 2 years that he has stated! Where did he go for that other year and what was he doing?  Was he taking courses in person at Columbia or was he enrolled in an overseas   program?   If he traveled overseas what name did he use?  How did he get the credits to attend Harvard with only 9 months attendance at Columbia?  Was it a Freudian slip when Obama said he went to  Pakistan or  is that one of the only truthful statements to come out of his mouth?  Below if verification of Obama’s limited attendance at Columbia.    Perhaps there will be apologies made to Dr. Manning?

Both of the photos below are Exhibits in Orly’s lawsuit.  One  is evidence garnered from the U.S. Government’s own Social Security Verification System.  Obama’s social security number that he stole and uses was entered into the database.  The results show ” FAIL”!   This means that the number and his name do not match!  The number was not issued to him!  Obama, you have a major problem!  Identity fraud comes to mind.

Let’s not forget that he also used the same social security number on the forged Selective Service Application.  That is two counts!   Shall we go for three?

Following are excerpts from her amended lawsuit.

Emphasis is mine.


26.   In this First Amended Complaint Taitz provides additional information, specifically Exhibit 1 Selective Service Application for Barack Obama, showing that he uses SSN 042-68-4425 and Exhibit 2  SSNVS Social Security number Verification System, which shows that this is not a legally obtained Social Security number for Barack Obama.  This is a prima facia evidence of  Social Security fraud and Identity Fraud obtained from the official records of the United States Government, which coupled with the age of 121 years old of the original applicant (date of birth 1890) justify release of at least redacted SS-5 information requested, such as gender, race and age of the SS5  applicant for SSN 042-68-4425 and the zip code, where the original SSN card was mailed by the social Security administration.  Concealment of such data will constitute aiding and abetting Social Security Fraud and Identity Theft.

27.   Further records from the Student Clearing House show even more shocking evidence. In his memoirs and multiple speeches Obama wrote that he studied for two years at Columbia University September 1981-May 1983.  He admitted that in summer of 1981 he traveled to Pakistan to visit his friends, but repeatedly claimed that from September 1981 until May of 1983 he resided in New York and studied at Columbia University.  Taitz ran a check of his  years of attendance at Columbia university and found out that Columbia official records show him attending Columbia university only for nine months September 1982-till May 1983 (Exhibit 3),  which means that the President of the United States lied to the whole nation about his whereabouts for a whole year September 1981 until September 1982. One year absence is the best case scenario, as he could get his university credit by reciprocity or through extern studies.

28. As there is no record of Obama residing anywhere else in the United States from September 1981-September 1982,  or attending any other university, by way of simple deduction it becomes clear that his visit to Pakistan lasted not a month or two, as he claims, but over a year.

29. In 1981-1982 Pakistan was ruled by a ruthless radical Muslim leader general Zia Ul Hac, who came to power as a result of a military coup, announced himself as a Chief Martial Law Administrator and ruled the country via the system of iron fist terror.   Supreme court of Pakistan, apparently afraid for their lives found such rule to be acceptable due to a “necessity” doctrine.   Based on verification of Columbia university records, Taitz found that Obama spent at least a year within the regime of general Zia Ul Hac. This revelation adds urgency in processing this complaint, as it shows that we have today an individual usurping the position of the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the whole US military, while using a stolen social security number, not possessing a valid long form U.S. birth certificate and defrauding the nation and concealing a whole year of his whereabouts.


Evidence is mounting against Barack Hussein Obama as not only a liar and the ultimate con-man,  but a person who has perpetrated the biggest fraud in the history of the United States.  Obama and  his fellow globalists, supporters, and associates have perpetrated these crimes against the people in our nation and have duped people throughout the world.    They have played their cards, and as the evidence mounts, this House of Cards will collapse.   Card after card after card.  There will be no Royal Flush.

Kudos once again for Orly Taitz’s tenacity and perseverance!

Patriots — it is time  to send this information to your Senators and Representatives and DEMAND that they investigate!  This is a national security issue!  We must put the pressure on them to act!  Their email addresses are in the Header at the top of the blog!

Click to Enlarge.

Social Security Administration Verification for Obama = FAIL

Columbia University Student Verification for Barack Obama

Columbia Verification for Barack Obama

312 responses to “Obama’s House of Cards is Collapsing!

  1. Trump Defends His Birtherism
    Mar 28 2011, 11:04 AM ET

    Real estate mogul and potential 2012 presidential contender Donald Trump defended his questioning of President Obama’s birth certificate Monday morning with a defiant, “this guy either has a birth certificate or he doesn’t.”

    “I am really concerned,” Trump said in a phone interview on “Fox & Friends.” “You have no doctors that remember, you have no nurses — this is the president of the United States — that remember. … He could have been born outside of this country. Why can’t he produce a birth certificate?”

    Trump, who has been flirting with a run for president, first made a remark about the so-called “birther” issue last week on “The View.” Obama provided news organizations with a scan of his birth certificate during his 2008 campaign, which some outlets also independently vetted.

    “I brought it up just routinely, and now I’m starting to wonder myself whether he was born in this country,” Trump said Monday.


    • Some outlets “independently vetted”? Which outlets were those? The Leftists Daily Kos, Media Matters, or Fact Check or was that Bill O’Reilly (soon to be seen with egg on face..the yokes on him)?

  2. What Trump Wants to Hear from Obama on Libya

    First he talks about Libya then Great Britain. Then he talks again about the birth certificate issue on Fox and Friends this morning. Then he suggests that Abercrombie is a liar..and that Neil was trying to help one of his democratic friends!

    Trump also called for Hawaii Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie to be investigated for stating that he remembers Obama’s birth.

    “I think this guy should be investigated,” Trump said. “I doubt it. He remembers when Obama was born? Give me a break! He’s just trying to do something for his party.”


  3. Slap in the face to Obama! Donald is pushing it!
    Exclusive to Newsmax: Donald Trump’s Birth Certificate
    28 Mar 2011

    The document released to Newsmax is below. It shows that Trump was born in New York, June 14, 1946.


    • This is not Trumph’s BC that would have been filed with the state. This is just the hospital certificate that is given to parents. What’s Trumph up to? This smells…………..

      • still better than a colb. i dont really think trump knows all the paperwork that is issued. at least it is tracable to a hospital and a physician.

      • Send an email to Newsmax and tell them. It is not the legal birth certificate that he would need to get a passport. It does not have the State Seal and is not certified. Newsmax should make that distinction. There is an easy contact us box. They need to receive this information to correct it. I did.

    • I do wonder why he’s showing a hospital birth certificate. If he’s setting the stage for Barry, then Barry probably could come up with a nice example from Kapiolani that wouldn’t be legal and might not even carry the onus of having to be real and LEGAL, meaning that the hospital or whoever created it wouldn’t necessarily be at risk of being accused of forgery. Just sayin’. I think it sort of stinks, too. This is insufficient proof for eligibility to the presidency. It’s circumstantial evidence, subject perhaps to being vetted, but it’s not “legal tender”. It’s not issued by a government entity, therefore is not LEGAL proof. I doubt that the State Dept. would accept this for a passport.

      • I was thinking the same thing Miri. If this is what Trump is up to, he is not on our side. He would only be helping to enable Obama to continue the fraud.

      • Maybe Donald doesn’t know the difference either. Was it legal to use that hospital version to get a passport years ago? Whatever he used then wasn’t needed again if he continued to renew his passport. Same with his driver’s license.

        • I know of a situation where a person needed a bc but didn’t have one (sort of like the Ike situation). The person ended up having to hire a lawyer to take affidavits from people who knew his parents when he was born, remembered his birth, and got the baptismal record from the church where he was baptized. It was a home birth. Finally after a lot of expense and rigmarole, they accepted the person’s word about his age. This was for retirement, to receive Social Security. This person somehow got a SS# without a BC, which is interesting in itself, but this was someone born in 1900, so one of the first recipients of a SS card. Who knows what the requirements were back then?

          The bottom line was that he lied about his age when he first started working because he actually was too young to legally work. Then when it came time to retire, he had to prove that he was old enough to retire.

          • He released it:

            Go there to see it because I don’t want them coming down on us for copyright infringement. Gotta love it!

          • So Trump plays his Trump card. Here’s step two: Do you see a raised seal? This is getting amusing beyond belief. ROFLOL!!!!

            ““Some in the media were challenging my birth certificate,” Trump told Newsmax Tuesday morning in an email. “So I solved the problem in a couple hours: here is my official Department of Health Birth Certificate.

            Trump said he is asking for Obama to make his birth certificate public, though he was not suggesting he believes the President was born outside of the country.

            Anyone can get an official birth certificate — in New York it costs you about $38. I felt obligated to take it to the next step, and get even more than the original hospital birth certificate I provided.

            It is my honor to present my official birth certificate to the public. Look, I am proud to be an American. It was very easy to do.”

            Trump added: “For the sake of the country the president ought to do the same, and end this unfortunate controversy once and for all,” Trump told Newsmax.”

            Read more on Newsmax.com: Angry Trump Fires Back: Here’s My Official Birth Certificate — Where’s Yours?

            Clever, clever man.

          • OMG!!! Two plus years and counting and we finally have someone from the lamestream reporting this:

            Legal sources tell Newsmax that a birth certificate is quite different from the “certification of live birth” document that the White House has provided to the media.

            The former officially confirms and records a newborn child’s identity, as well of details of the birth. But the latter merely confirms that someone has reported the birth of the child.

            Because the standards needed to obtain a certificate of live birth are much lower, the sources say, they are easier to obtain.

            To obtain a copy of a birth certificate, the identity of the person making the request must be established beyond any doubt.”

        • Yes, it was. Sigh. Birth registration in the US was NOT even standardized at all until somewhere in 1905ish.
          But people were not given certificates as the usual thing until after WW1.
          It happened that there was a lot of kids lying to get into the military, so things had to be changed.
          But, the original BC’s that were given were like Trumps. They were not used the same way back then as now. They were meant to be decorative. To be framed.
          REMEMBER the era. I think people forget to do that.

          • I still have my original hospital BC (and the LEGAL one, too) and my hospital version has both my footprints and my mother’s thumbprint on it! Now that would be nice if Barry could come up with one like that. Except it still wouldn’t be legal. The reason the doctor’s name matters on the filed with the dept. of health version is that it’s a LEGAL document upon which the doctor signs his name. No doctor would risk his career by falsifying such a document. But it’s far easier for the forgers to come up with a “hospital” version with a forged signature of one of the five (was it?) OB’s on staff at Kapiolani in 1961.

            I hope somebody tells The Donald that we need to see his OFFICIAL, CERTIFIED by the STATE BC, not this item that’s decorative and is about as useful as that testimonial that made the Tin Man think he had a brain. A testimonial like that isn’t going to make us believe that Obama has a birth certificate (or a brain).

            They might think they could pull this off. He presents it and it has a doctor’s signature on it and then people howl and then they say, “See? We said they’re racists. They are just moving the goal post again. They wanted the doctor’s signature and there it is. But it’s still not good enough.”

            I hope this isn’t the case but why, oh, why are the lamestream running with this “story” that’s been out there for over two years? Are they happy for a second chance to “vet” Obama? Are they perhaps that disgusted with his lack of sufficient liberalness? I wonder. Do they now think Hillary is more electable than Obama is re-electable? Meet the new boss, same as the old boss?

            At this point, that hospital cerficate would mean squat because if there is one then there has to be the other and it remains a FACT that instead of simply showing the original certified bc, he spent millions to avoid showing it, never even presented the COLB that he claims exists to any court that took the case, and ALLOWED A PATRIOT TO GO TO PRISON, destroying his life and his family’s future. There’s NO EXCUSE for that IMMORAL, SHAMEFUL ACT. None.

          • Is my theory of a trap set for the media true?


            top aide to Donald Trump is sharply refuting suggestions of hypocrisy in response to the media mogul’s release of an unofficial document of his birth only hours after chastising President Obama for failing to produce his official birth certificate.

            “I can assure you, Mr. Trump is a U.S. citizen,” Trump aide and lawyer Michael Cohen told CNN. “He is only asking for the president to do what the president said he would do – release his birth certificate.”

            The improbable presidential candidate set off charges of hypocrisy Monday after he provided what he claimed was a copy of his birth certificate to the conservative website Newsmax.com. The release of the document came the same day he told Fox News he keeps his birth certificate “on my desk” and would gladly provide it.

            “It took me one hour to get my birth certificate,” Trump told Newsmax. “It’s inconceivable that, after four years of questioning, the president still hasn’t produced his birth certificate.”

            But, as reported by the website The Smoking Gun and confirmed by Cohen, the document Trump released is in fact not an official birth certificate – instead it is a hospital “birthing record,” Cohen says. Hospitals generally provide such documents, signed by administrators, for families upon the birth of a child but they do not count as official birth certificate, which is released by state agencies.

            Cohen said the release of the incorrect document was merely an “oversight” that he is sure it will be corrected.

            End of quote.

  4. Boycott bo’s Speech!

    Make it the lowest rated pResidential Address in History!

  5. [Obama] You Should Have Listened to Farrakhan When You Were at His Table: New Black Panthers Turn on Obama in an N-Word, Uncle Tom Tirade (Content Warning)

    Obama represents the white man. Michelle should walk out on him. We pray that Gadaffi survives.


    • Is this for real? Are the Black Panthers really turning on Obama or is this a ploy? Holder didn’t prosecute them and now we are supposed to think they are all of a sudden against Obama? Smoke and mirrors for what reason? Is this one of Alinsky’s Rules..lie and deceive? One thing remains constant, this group is racist..against whites.

      • Yes, it’s a typical Alinsky tactic. Just like Lerner and SEIU pretended that he no longer worked for them, in order to keep the six degrees of separation between Lerner’s incendiary, possibly treasonous plans to destroy the US economy. He still works for them, as has been confirmed. As suspected. Nothing is as it seems.

        • Yes. Subversion.

          How can a white American/ black Kenyan/ adopted Indonesian be an Uncle Tom?
          Impossible. Zero connection.

          Perhaps his wife is the Uncle Tom in this particular case.

  6. Purple lips shriveling

    Lying sack of um uh

    Pontificating. Entrancing the Youth.
    Re-educating the Military
    Obliterating the Laws of the Land

    A laughing stock. bogus potus.

  7. http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/03/28/sanders-questions-war-libya

    “This country has a $14 trillion dollar national debt. We are currently fighting a…neverending war in Afghanistan. We are still in Iraq, and I think a lot of people are worried about how long we are going to be in this war in Libya,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.

    “I think when somebody drops bombs on other people, usually I think we refer to that as a war,” Sanders said, adding that Congress could very well have a role to play in the current situation. The senator, who has in the past supporting a defunding of the U.S. war in Iraq, said, “I think one of the things many people are upset about is this war took place without consultation of the Congress, without debate within the Congress.

    • Sanders said this? Maybe they are getting that bus ready for someone to go under. Has he heard that Lieberman was talking about a fourth war?

  8. How much is he going to give them to rebuild, Congress?

  9. Trump is now talking to Greta! So there will be another video.

    They [Democrats] are really, really reeling from this issue. No one is coming forth saying, I delivered this beautiful baby. A Democratic governor…that says he was there when he was born; he is taking a bullet for this president. If he wasn’t born in this country, his presidency would be illegal.

    Greta is backing up Obama..who hasn’t seen her own birth certificate in years. The democrats are using this to raise money. Donald doesn’t think that is true. If you look at the internet, this is not a issue that is good for them, he said.

  10. Sharon doesn’t miss a point in her absolutely superb letter to Donald Trump. She even requests an interview to further discuss Obama’s ineligibility.

    The Post & Email Contacts Donald Trump About Obama’s Ineligibility
    March 28


    • Wow and wow. That is an EXCELLENT letter. Way to go, Sharon!!!!! Applause. She doesn’t miss a point. I hope Trump takes her up on the interview. Why not? He’s everywhere else. If he doesn’t, then I might take that as a sign.

    • It occurs to me that Donald Trump is wealthy enough to lend a hand to that brave patriot, LTC Lakin and his family. Will The Donald step up? One can only assume that until Sharon’s letter, he was ignorant of LTC Lakin’s fate. Now that he knows, will he start talking about that shameful fact, too?

  11. Trump On the Record with Greta:

    • Donald Trump: Obama presidency possibly illegal
      ‘To be honest with you, I want him to have a birth certificate’

      March 29, 2011

      “To be honest with you, I want him to have a birth certificate,” Trump said, “because [otherwise] that would mean that his presidency was, I guess you’d have to say, illegal. You have to be born in the United States. I hope that he was born in the United States. I hope – but I want to get rid of the word hope, I want to know for sure – I hope that he was born in the United States and I hope this doesn’t become a big issue.”

      He also called into question Hawaii’s Democratic Gov. Neil Abercrombie for suggesting he remembered when Obama was born nearly a half century ago.

      “I’ll bet he didn’t even know the parents 50 years ago,” Trump said. “I think it’s absolutely insane. What he’s doing is taking a bullet for the party by making a statement that, ‘I remember.'”

      “Here’s the president of the United States, and no doctor, no nurse, nobody’s come forward saying, ‘I delivered that beautiful baby.'”


  12. Here’s the seriously ironic story by Ben Smith questioning TRUMP’S BC:

    “Trump fails to produce birth certificate
    Donald Trump made headlines earlier today when he provided what he said was a copy of his birth certificate — but
    a quick check reveals it’s actually not an official document. [Oh, what a quick check in 2008 might have accomplished.]

    The paper that Trump released says “Jamaica Hospital” on top and lists the date and time of what he says was his birth to “Mr. and Mrs. Fred C. Trump.” The piece of paper has a seal at the bottom.

    But after several New York City-based readers contacted POLITICO’s Maggie Haberman, her call to city officials revealed that an actual birth certificate, which is issued by the Department of Health, would have the agency’s seal and also a signature of the city registrar – [did Maggie make any calls to Hawaii, one must wonder?] neither of which the Trump document has. Officials said the city Health Department is the “sole issuing authority” of official birth certificates in New York, and that the document would clearly say so, and “city officials said it’s not an official document.” [Quite a change from the HDOH people who claim that they can’t say anything, one way or another, about a birth certificate lest they break the law. Hmmmm.]

    It appears instead to be a hospital “certificate of birth,” meaning the piece of paper the hospital gave to his family saying he was born. Such a document typically has the signature of the hospital administrator and the attending physician.”

    I am doing the Church Lady happy dance that Trump has outfoxed the fox, on Fox, now that I think about it!

    • This is exactly what was needed! The Left comes out to say Trump’s isn’t a real birth certificate! My, my, did they do some investigative work at Politico? Did they make that one phone call ..that will get to the bottom of it! Do they really know the difference between a hospital version and a real BC when they have pretended for 2 + years that the internet version of Obama’s is real?

      Way to go Maggie..you got right on that investigation of Trump! Stamp FOOL on all the heads of those at Politico!

      Love that ..Trump outfoxed the fox, on FOX! They are playing with the big boys now! I guess they don’t understand shrewd.

      Trump holds the trump card!

  13. ABC news is being similarly hypocritical. It’s funny to watch. Yes, didn’t Maggie just jump right in there? They cannot help themselves. Did you notice in Ben Smith’s article that he even got in a dig with reference to Air Claire by saying that Trump’s plane is registered elsewhere? So they’re carrying water for Claire, too, so upset that she’s been “smeared” for “only” forgetting to pay a third of a million in taxes. Which, btw, was no problem to cough up. So much for rich elites.

  14. The only way this may still be other than it seems is if this is a set up for Barry to present some lame story about his mother being unwed, the shame for the daughters, his father not on the BC (but it IS BHO Sr.), etc., and then saying those evil Republicans caused me to shame myself, mother, daughters, wife when he releases this bogus “original BC” and hopes that everybody forgets LTC Lakin. Ya think? I hope not. But nothing is ever as it seems in the Obamanation. And That One (and the Other, too) always has a trick up his sleeve. Please allow me to introduce myself . . .

    And my bc!

  15. I do so hope that Trump is aware of LTC Lakin and his fate. I hope he read Sharon’s letter. It certainly seems as if he completely understands where we’ve been coming from for the past few years. And now it’s so hilarious to hear the lamestream SUDDENLY, in reference to Trump’s bc, make the exact same arguments that we much-derided, often-ridiculed “birthers” make about Barry’s bogus COLB.

    • Trump’s mother was born in Scotland. I think he is making this point actually.

      • He’s making all kinds of points: They question HIS NBC-ship because his mother was born in Scotland, which I reported somewhere above (I thought.) But she was naturalized by the time of his birth, so he’s a NBC. But the point is that they question HIS possibly having only one born-a-US-citizen parent. But not Obama’s proven one non-US-citizen parent, who wasn’t even a permanent resident, much less an immigrant. He is proving them to be hypocrites on every count: His born-in-Scotland mother (who was pointed out and he was questioned about) versus Barry’s Kenyan un-naturalized, non-immigrant father (who the media has never questioned Barry, the constitutional law professor about). They jump on the fact that HIS hospital BC isn’t “official”. They actually CALL the health dept. to investigate what constitutes an official BC (and amazingly enough, the health dept. is more than happy to answer questions, unlike the HDOH), who can issue them and how they’re obtained–things that they NEVER did for Barry for over two years.

        They are totally vetting Trump and actually now using the EXACT arguments against him that they ridiculed us and called us racist bigots for using with regard to Barry’s COLB, which isn’t even a BC.

        So they force Trump to pull out the original long-form, which he does in one day; but they have still not, and probably still won’t, ask Barry for HIS long-form birth certificate.

        It’s perfect.

      • yes Renee, he included his Mother’s Naturalization ID.
        the point. he’s a full blooded, second generation American born in Queens.

        he put out the hospital cert first to get the libtoons on the record that it wasn’t an official birth certificate. bwahahahaha

        • And Miri!! I was delighted to see Mrs. Trump’s ID…

          i think the Clintons’ are behind this. paybackssss in spadessss.

        • bwahahahaha is correct! So freaking funny. No wonder the guy’s a gazillionaire. He’s cunning. Who’s the wise guy, huh? Trump!

        • “he included his Mother’s Naturalization ID”

          Do you have a link for this, and has the Naturalization ID been confirmed, with a date prior to Donald’s birth?

          • Mario Apuzo
            puzo1moderator said..One of my messages to The Donald today ….

            The far left OBOT backing Obama catering media and press are attacking your mother’s Scottish home country birth. That is not a valid issue — she was a naturalized citizen when you were born. They are once again lying and putting out disinformation and half truths to the American electorate.

            All that is required per the founders and framers intent with the legal term of art “natural born Citizen” in the presidential eligibility clause in our Constitution is that the parents of the child be U.S. Citizens when born AND born in the USA. About 95% of American citizens meet that so it is not a restrictive small class. It is the group who make up the overwhelming vast majority of U.S. Citizens and it is from that group we are supposed to choose our Presidents.

            The parents can be foreign born as long as the parents were naturalized Citizens when the child is born in the USA. Since your foreign born Scottish mother married a U.S. Citizen in the USA she was automatically naturalized under U.S. law in the 1930s under the legal concept of Citizenship fusion by marriage. The wife automatically by marital fusion law gains the Citizenship of her husband.

            Thus when you were born in 1946 your were born to two Citizen parents in the USA and you are thus a fully qualified constitutional Article II, Section 1, “natural born Citizen” of the United States.


          • I would like to know the answer to this question too Redpill.

        • A commenter elsewhere pointed me to this…

          Research by FReeper “ASA Vet” shows that Trump’s mother was a naturalized U.S. citizen before The Donald was born:


          We need to verify that research, but initially it looks good.

          As long as that proves true (that his mother became a Naturalized US Citizen March 10, 1942, long before she gave birth to Donald on June 14, 1946 in Queens, New York, NY), then Trump is therefore in the PERFECT position to challenge Soetoro/Obama on this issue!!!

  16. At this point, I am glad that Trump is operating as the Stalking Horse on the BC issue, but I hope he does not run as an Independent and throw the election to a democrat in 2012 as in 1992.

    • I’m not sure about Trump, but an Independent might not be such a bad idea. Remember that both the Democrats and the Republicans perputrated this FRAUD of Obummer on the American People. If his house of cards fall, we need to clean house all the way!

      • I too have doubts about Trump’s true intentions when he praises Hillary like he did in that interview on CNN with Wolf Blitzer, but I agree, we need to clean house.

    • My fear, also. It’s the only way I can see that Barry might win. And they chose our nominee last time, didn’t they? Making sure it was McCain.

  17. Obama is getting soooo excited..why? Because he is going to announce somewhere and sometime in the next three weeks…yes, you guessed it..he is going for his 2nd term! Thrilling isn’t it? Megan Kelly divulged that fantastic news. I guess the guy isn’t worried about the BC issue.

    I thought he might have decided not to run …but who could give up Air Force One, weekly parties with Hollywood stars, concerts on demand, long multiple vacations, golf every weekend, playing basketball with the NBA, dancing with Ellen, visits on the late night shows, and the power. Work..oh, that is the downside.

  18. What business does he have in Ireland? Any one know?

    probably getting adopted again

  19. I think there is a Full House with Trump and HRC… they are thick and have been for a loooong time. But that’s okay. Maybe the plan is to karate chop the cards. how apropos that the end card trumped. I love irony. perfect.

    Bill Clinton knows exactly what he’s doing, imho (well, maybe not so humble…LOL!) 😉

    • It was Bill C that brought up the constitutionality of Obama running prior to the election. Wish I had that quote..but it did resonate at the time. Hillary, Bill and Donald may be Three of a Kind. With Trump having backed Hillary (Trump Hearts Hillary), it makes perfectly good sense that the ultimate Pair of game players could be behind this breaking of the BC issue by Trump. These Three of a Kind purposely could be beating Obama over the head with a Club. Is Trump our Diamond in the fluff? I am enjoying Trump being willing to call a Spade a Spade. I will be extremely ecstatic seeing Obama get the flush royally!

      • Yea, Bridgette. It appears the deck is stacked. Bill came right out and said it when he was in Africa…

        Trump, the ace up his sleeve.

      • And explains Trump’s closeness with Soros? It’s said Soros hearts Hil, too. This isn’t good news. But at least the Republican candidate might have a chance if Barry’s knocked out (of the race). I don’t see how Hillary could run and win, considering that she’s been complicit with Barry for the past few years.

        • And explains Trump’s closeness with Soros?
          Really Miri ? Lovely. From Scotland…..Where is O again ? Ireland ?
          Luck of the Irish…

  20. Whoa…did I really hear Pawlenty say that CNN showed Obama’s birth certificate on TV? So why would CNN lie? We have more important issues to deal with! So CNN is Pawlenty’s authority on the issue!

    Hannity said he hadn’t really followed the issue but has become interested recently.

    • Whoops. I commented on this a few minutes ago. Didn’t see your comment first. Yes, Pawlenty did say that CNN saw Obama’s birth certificate. Hannity did say something like, “I don’t think CNN is reliable.” That’s a paraphrase. I didn’t catch his exact sentence, but that’s the gist of it.

  21. Possible Proof Of Trump U.S. Birth Uncovered
    Discovery could quell concerns of growing “Trumper” movement

    MARCH 29–Though Donald Trump has yet to release his actual birth certificate, a tantalizing clue emerged today that may indicate the multimillionaire developer was, in fact, born in the United States, The Smoking Gun has learned.

    Trump, who has challenged President Barack Obama to prove he is an American citizen, yesterday released what he claimed to be his own birth certificate (“It took me one hour to get,” he crowed). Except the document Trump proffered was not an official New York City birth certificate, but rather a document purportedly produced by Jamaica Hospital, where Trump was reportedly born in June 1946.

    In an attempt to track down proof of the 64-year-old Trump’s citizenship, TSG today traveled to the main branch of the New York Public Library, which houses a collection of microfiche indices to New York City births. The microfiche cards contain the official Department of Health ledgers of births, broken down by year and borough.

    An examination of envelope XMG-1108–which contains an alphabetical listing of all recorded births in New York City in 1946–reveals that a child with the surname “Trump” and the given name “Donald” was born on June 14 in Queens. As seen above (click to enlarge), the entry also includes the number of the corresponding Department of Health birth certificate–7624. The real estate developer has said he was born on June 14.

    A New York City birth certificate includes information about a child’s parents, where and when the birth occurred, and the signature of the medical official who attested to details of the birth. However, like Hawaii, New York City birth certificates are not public documents. A copy of a birth certificate will only be released by the Office of Vital Records to the named party or an attorney representing them.

    So, to quell suspicions from the growing “Trumper” movement, The Donald–if he does not already have a copy of certificate 7624 from 1946–may want to head here and get his order in the pipeline. A copy will set him back $15, plus $8.30 for a “mailing and service charge.” If Trump orders now online, the wait for processing on his request will only be a few days. (2 pages)


    • See how quickly a candidate can be vetted? And how quickly libraries and depts. of health can give out information, if they care to?

      Did anybody see Pawlenty on Hannity tonight? He did himself NO favors and disenchanted at least one potential voter by making the ridiculous claim that (he saw it himself!) CNN reported (said, claimed) that they SAW the Obama birth certificate. Yes, indeed! How could we have missed this? A CNN reporter said on the TeeVee that he or she SAW Obama’s birth certificate. Well, then, IT MUST BE TRUE IF CNN SAID IT!

  22. Possible Proof Of Trump U.S. Birth Uncovered
    Discovery could quell concerns of growing “Trumper” movement

    UPDATE: Two hours after the below story was published, Trump released a copy of his birth certificate. [See Below]
    MARCH 29–

    “Trump knew exactly what he was doing, purposely released the hospital bc, all you people spent more time examining his bc than you have Barry’s you all knew it wasn’t a legal Long Form Birth Certificate, the likes of which “President Obama” has yet to release.

    Then after you’ve all made complete fools out of yourselves including your media heads, ta-dum! This is what a legal long form looks like and it’s nothing like obama’s Certification of Live Birth, the Certification only proves a child was born alive.

    Even Sun Yat Sen, founding father of the Republic of China (Taiwan), who was born in Cuiheng, China, was issued a Certification of Live Birth by the State of Hawaii. It’s long been known Hawaii is the place to go for illegals to magically become American citizens, it’s Hawaii’s dirty little secret. The publication of a birth notice in the local paper also proves nothing as these notices are routinely taken off the Certificate of Live Birth registrations.

    When Factcheck.org released a “Certification of Live Birth” in August 2008, the organization did not disclose that it lacked the information present on the official long-form document which contains the signature of the doctor who delivered the child, the height and weight of the baby, and considerable personal information about the parents such as occupation and their birthplaces. An official document also would have contained a raised stamp from the Registrar of Vital Statistics, the seal is not raised, it’s incised! It’s a forgery, this is why the State of Hawaii will not verify what was put on the internet is a legal copy.

    Questions directed to Factcheck.org staff members have repeatedly gone unanswered, no surprise forgery is punishable by law. So now TSG, after the irony of this show and your articles chronicling this event, may we expect to see you release “President Obama’s” original Long Form Birth Certificate in your follow-up?”


  23. Is this a concern or just Big Business?

    Big names back Trump tower
    Soros, Deutsche Bank said to be in on 90-story building

    October 28, 2004 By Thomas A. Corfman, Tribune staff reporter.

    Donald Trump has lined up three New York hedge funds, including money from billionaire George Soros, to invest $160 million in his Chicago skyscraper, a key piece in perhaps the largest construction financing in the city’s history, according to real estate sources and public documents.

    Despite reports about the project’s record-breaking sales, most of them from Trump himself, many Chicago real estate developers and lenders have expressed doubts about whether the 90-story tower would ever be built.


    • Concerns me. Strange bedfellows? In Chicago?

      Speaking of Chicago, this is off topic, but Cook county is fighting with the “downstate” Illinois counties that feature big prisons. You know, those places where big urban areas send their gangstas to get rehabbed. NIMBY, you know. What are they fighting about? Well, the geniuses figured out that the counties with the prisons get to count the “residents” on the census and therefore those downstate, rural counties get more federal largesse. So what do the thuggish politicos in Chi-town want to do? They want to pass a law that allows them to count the crooks as their residents, even though they really “reside” in the rural counties. Most of the crooks, as you can guess, come from Chicago.

    • A concern.

  24. Take Two: Donald Trump Releases Official Birth Certificate
    March 29, 2011 1:11 PM

    Trump RELEASED LONG FORM Birth Certificate!

    It shows that “Donald John Trump” was born June 14, 1946 in Jamaica Hospital in Queens.It lists his father as Fred C. Trump and his mother as Mary Mac Leod. The date of the report is listed as June 14, 1946.

    The image came with an accompanying memo from a member of Trump’s staff.

    “A ‘birth certificate’ and a ‘certificate of live birth’ are in no way the same thing, even though in some cases they use some of the same words,” wrote Trump staffer Thuy Colayco in a message to ABC News.

    “One officially confirms and records a newborn child’s identity and details of his or her birth, while the other only confirms that someone reported the birth of a child.

    Also, a ‘certificate of live birth’ is very easy to get because the standards are much lower, while a ‘birth certificate’ is only gotten through a long and detailed process wherein identity must be proved beyond any doubt. If you had only a certificate of live birth, you would not be able to get a proper passport from the Post Office or a driver’s license from the Department of Motor Vehicles. Therefore, there is very significant difference between a ‘certificate of live birth’ and a ‘birth certificate’ and one should never be confused with the other.”


  25. Donald Trump’s Birth Certificate(s)
    by Kathleen Foster | March 29, 2011 Snip

    Hawaii’s Department of Health has said the certificate of live birth is the standard form it issues to obtain a driver’s license and passport, and that President Obama’s is valid.When Fox asked the State Department if a “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii, like President Obama’s, is enough to qualify for a passport, a State Department official offered only this statement:

    “A certified birth certificate is generally considered primary evidence of U.S. citizenship.Additional guidance on submitting evidence of U.S. citizenship is available on travel.state.gov/passport. We cannot comment on President Obama’s birth certificate or passport records.”

    So-called “birthers” question President Obama’s certificate of live birth because it appears to be missing a registrar’s signature and an embossed seal. Those who have seen it say both are on the back side. However, like the official seal on Trump’s certificate, those not privy to the original can’t see the signature or feel the stamp on Obama’s either.

    If one thing is clear, proving you are a naturally-born citizen of the United States isn’t so easy.


    • Kathleen.. You are Fired!

      What a FALSE report! Using the wrong terminology will get you the wrong and totally incorrect answers. You are saying that the DOH has said that Obama’s is VALID! What a bunch of hooey ! This is on the record, I guess Kathleen that you were able to get the DOH to admit that Obama’s BC is valid?

      Were you Naturally born too Kathleen? What a fool.

      • Bridgette: This is SO funny. Did you notice that she says since nobody can feel Trump’s BC, then nobody can say the seal is raised and authentic? Gee, did she ask to feel Barry’s COLB? Didn’t think so.

        This is very funny: “A credit card receipt (at the bottom of this link) included in the paperwork provided by Trump shows he ordered the copy of the birth certificate on April 27th, 1999. The birth certificate shows it was issued the next day on 4-28-99. If Trump had already obtained this official document, then why did he offer up his Hospital Birth Certificate first?”

        BECAUSE HE’S SO MUCH SMARTER THAN YOU ARE, KATHLEEN! He laid the trap and you walked right into it. Bwahahahahah!

        • If Trump had already obtained this official document, then why did he offer up his Hospital Birth Certificate first?”

          Ohhhh…the irony…ahahhahahhahahhaha !

          Like the taste of that frog soup ?
          That is the soup we had to taste too..
          Like it ?

          Trump is so smart ! LOL !

      • No, not naturally born here if this is the same person.

    • FOSTER ?
      Like Jodi FOSTER and John HINKLEY ?

      WHO is Kathleen again ?

  26. What does Trump know? Listen to this tape at just after the 2 min mark. He says ad in the Houston paper. Have you ever heard of an ad in the Houston paper?
    Trump Card Beats Race Card

    • The same tape is up above at:
      Bridgette | March 28, 2011 at 1:50 pm

      Good catch Kathy. I didn’t hear him say that before. But I am sure he meant Hawaii, don’t you? He was talking quite fast and in the context of the conversation, I would think he meant Hawaii and said Houston instead. He has talked about the ad in the paper before, and that the parents were poor and wouldn’t pay for the ad. I haven’t looked at that birth announcement for awhile, but isn’t it a column on an ad sheet where things are for sale?

      • I don’t know. His whole card playing game is interesting. He may have just slipped us a clue. Relatives in other places sometimes announce the birth of relatives in papers. Maybe somebody should check the Houston papers just to be sure. He implied that it was after his alleged birth. It may be a slip, but The Donald is really sharp.

        • Also, if it was a slip, why Houston? What was he thinking about Houston?

        • Anyone here from Houston who can go check the papers to be sure?

          • Defunct:

            El Día
            Houston Post
            [edit] African-American newspapersThe City of Houston has several African-American-owned newspapers published in the city. Allan Turner of the Houston Chronicle said that the papers “are both journalistic throwbacks — papers whose content directly reflects their owners’ views — and cutting-edge, hyper-local publications targeting the concerns of the city’s roughly half-million African-Americans.” By 2011 many of the African-American newspapers began to establish presences on the world wide web.

        • If it’s in the Houston papers, somebody had to pay for the ad. That would be interesting. If he is referring to the Hawaii papers, which are supposed to come from the State, they would be free. I think he is telling us something.

      • They were newspapers. It’s questionable how the announcements got into the papers. It looks like an ad sheet, but the announcements, under headings like “Health Bureau Statistics”, were interspersed with the ads. The stats included births, deaths, marriages. Which makes me wonder why nobody’s looked for an announcement of that marriage. I know that in the past such records WERE public record and were commonly printed in the newspapers. Also items like burial permits. Death records would often list address and cause of death. I know this for a fact because I use such items to fill out my family tree. Sometimes there were special publications put out by the government to list these statistics. We don’t know if the health dept. sent these records to the papers or if the papers sent a reporter over to get them or if they might also include phoned-in announcements. We do know from ladysforest’s and butterdezillion’s work, among others, that they lied about the lists being the same in both papers all the time. butterdezillion says that from their careful analysis, they seemed to be the same births only on the issue with Obama’s supposed announcement (but it’s never been proven that HE is “the son” and it’s never been proven that SADOS is the “Mrs.”). I may be wrong about the details or maybe got the issue back asswards, but the bottom line is that apparently the papers would announce at their own pace. Maybe as space allowed. Typesetting was far more tedious in those days.

        Trump is misinformed if he believes that the “parents were poor.” And if these were health bureau stats, they were printed as a public service, no doubt. In fact, some states and municipalities required such items to be published. But official stats don’t typically read the way those birth announcements do.

    • I have found alot in Houston…Harris County alot….

  27. I read that the Libs are planning to boycott Trump’s businesses! I hope he has them all arrested if they are trespassing on his properties. They are really getting desperate now if they think they can scare and intimidate Donald. Yeah, he is one of those evil rich guys that probably employs thousands! Watch him shake in his boots!

    Trump dared ask a question of the Usurper…King Obama. No one is allowed to question his majesty! Do you really think he will kiss Obama’s royal a@@? Or will he kick his royal a@@?

  28. Leo’s latest article – Snips

    “Justice Hugo Black in DUNCAN v LOUISIANA Indicates Obama Would Not Be Eligible: Ineligibility Echoed by Former Attorney General Jeremiah Black

    If a child is born in the US to a father who owes allegiance to a foreign power, that child also owes allegiance to that foreign power. This was always our law. It was US law at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, at the time Obama was born, and it is US law today. Nothing has changed.

    Obama admits his birth status was governed by the United Kingdom. I think it’s very important to note that Obama himself gave preference to the United Kingdom in his statement at Fight The Smears. Notice that he didn’t say his birth status was governed by both United Kingdom and the US. Obama chose to give preference to his father’s nationality by stating that his birth status was directly tied to his father and not his mother.

    Read the quote from his web site again:

    “As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”

    I will finish this report with a question:

    Why did Obama feel compelled to state that his birth status was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 rather than the 14th Amendment?


    • This is a tour de force by Leo. IF the case EVER gets to the SCOTUS, he’s written the brief already for the anti-O litigants. Good going, Leo. Good research by “Linda” who found the item. Great write-up. Great research. Barry is NAILED with this one.

      So it IS NOT true that the SCOTUS hasn’t spoken to the definition/meaning of NBC, or did I misread? Were Black’s comments part of the decision (they were a “concurring opinion”)? So does this mean that the DECISION of the SCOTUS is


      Not being a lawyer, I’m not exactly sure what I’m talking about, but one point bears repeating: This case came AFTER the infamous Wong Kim Ark (which I have banned from discussion by obots on this blog because it does NOT apply), so there goes the obots’ favorite lame argument.

      Did you notice this caveat? “except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” Remember how that Indian woman was forced to hurry up and “adopt” Barry? Covering all the bases? I think not Barry. Nobody believes you’re an “Indian”, unless you mean possibly a “desi” as you said once, and your mother is NOT Cherokee. In your dreams, asshat.

    • I hope that Leo answers his final question. I could take a stab at it:

      IF Barry stated that HIS OWN birth status was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948, my guess is it’s because he’s a clever lying lawyer who parses words with Clintonesque flair and is very careful to always lie while telling the literal truth and to never get CAUGHT in a lie.

      I say “if” he said that about his own birth status because Fight the Smears website (now) clearly says that it’s a project of the DNC, not authorized by any candidate and was published in conjunction with and paid for by Organizing for America. It’s a campaign website that itself says that the candidate isn’t responsible for the content and which is not subject to HAVING to be TRUTHFUL. How many campaign ads are TRUE?

      So that campaign ad website claims that “Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a NATIVE citizen of the United States of America.” Who’s Barack Obama? The POTUS says his legal name is Barack Hussein Obama II. What exactly is a “native” citizen? A Native Hawaiian citizen? No claim is made that he’s a natural born citizen.

      As further proof that there’s no requirement for a campaign ad to be truthful, they post the copy of the COLB and claim that it’s his “official birth certificate”. It is NOT–not because it’s a photoshopped digital image and not a 3-D document, but because even a 3-D certified COLB is not a birth certificate, as we and even the lamestream media now, courtesy of The Donald, know.

      In addition, above that sentence they claim that the “smear” is actually to imply that “Barack” is not an American citizen. Well, that’s a lie, too, because the issue was and remains whether he was a natural born citizen of the USA AT BIRTH. And the answer is NO (unless he’s lying about who he is, which is entirely possible).

      Keep in mind that all these claims are made on a campaign website that is about as truthful as any other campaign ad that you see during elections. And it clearly states at the bottom that no candidate endorses the information.

      The sentences about the British Nationality Act, cited by Leo, are on Fight the Smears in a footnote citation referring back to FactCheck blog, which similarly has no requirement to be TRUTHFUL, any more than we are REQUIRED HERE on our blog to be truthful, under the law. Let’s parse that paragraph:

      “When Barack Obama Jr. [Who is Jr.? The POTUS says he’s the II–a different Barack altogether. Was Jr. a brother by another mother? Or a cousin? Who knows?] was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu [Facts not in evidence], Kenya was a British Colony [True], still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire [Anti-colonialist dig, but irrelevant]. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948 [Likely true, but unproven. We’ll cede the point for the sake of discussion]. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children. [TRUE, but who are his children?]”

      This last is the most important point. It jumped out at me the instant I read it over two years ago. Just WHO ARE Obama Sr.’s children and WHO IS NOT HIS CHILD?

      In this sentence, why did FactCheck studiously avoid saying, “That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s child, Barack Hussein Obama II?”

      Why mention only his “children”? We don’t care about the nationality status of all of his children. This issue concerns one person: The person who sits in the WH and acts as POTUS.

      It is so much like that other carefully parsed FactCheck statement about the COLB: How it contains all the information required by the State Dept. to get a passport. That, the moment I read it, also jumped out as if written in RED LETTERS.

      Why, I asked myself, were they talking about whether you could use a COLB to get a passport, when everybody was talking about whether or not the COLB was sufficient proof of eligibility for the presidency. Later on, I grokked the possible explanation: That COLB, according to FactCheck blog’s own photographs, came into existence and was photographed by them only days before John O. Brennan’s contract employees cauterized Barry’s passport files of “embarrassing” information. A tell, if I ever saw one.

      So I have learned to carefully parse everything the DNC, FactCheck, OFA, FTS, and Barry himself say. They lie by omission. They lie by misleading. They lie by distracting. They lie by distorting the issue and answering questions not asked. Lies. All Alinsky tactics. All Clintonesque prevarication and obfuscation.

      I don’t accept that Barry EVER said that his own status was governed by the British Nationality Act of any year. He allowed his minions to imply that, but he has maintained his six degrees of separation for ALL claims, even claims about that COLB. Even if he has ever stated that he showed his birth certificate, he can always blame his minions, who are reportedly the ones he “delegated” to getting it and publishing it.

      He can say his “mistake”, like McCaskill in the Air Claire scandal, was to depend upon staff and not closely enough oversee them to make sure they did things the right way. Even if they ever prove definitively that the COLB is fraudulent, he himself can say that he did not authorize it. Just like Nixon didn’t authorize Watergate. It was just rogue supporters who loved their idol too much.

  29. I got this at Kate’s and it bothers me. I read that Trump’s holdings are all mortgaged to the hilt with JP Morgan. Then I read this so it makes me wonder. I have not verified anything, I just keep reading it over and over. I also read of a Trump- Soros friendship so it is not sitting well. I guess I shold be happy for the information but connections bother me. You know…

    Trump Card Beats Race Card « drkatesview Az.
    Watcher March 28, 2011 at 6:23 pm
    No. The way is financial. Through the Soros hedge fund that holds precious metals. Soros or his ilk need only ask for delivery on the Comex which JPM has shorted. Because there is no silver. Then the BOE will collapse. Then the US. Watch out for May. Most likely Soros will use financial blackmail which he will call leverage.

  30. Pawlenty calls out Trump
    March 29

    “(CNN) – Donald Trump should quit questioning President Obama’s birthplace, says Tim Pawlenty, a potential future opponent of Trump’s for the Republican presidential nomination.

    Appearing on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Pawlenty said he doesn’t doubt Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii and says members of his party should stop pushing the issue.

    It should be noted that CNN and other news organizations have thoroughly debunked the rumors about the president’s birthplace. Hawaii has released a copy of the president’s birth certificate – officially called a “certificate of live birth” – and the hospital where he was born took out ads in two Hawaiian newspapers in 1961 announcing the birth.”


    • CNN stays by their lies! Peculiar that Pawlenty relies on CNN for his news. A Republican, really? A global warming guy too? He might be representing the wrong side.

      CNN has debunked the “rumors” or was it Anderson Cooper that helped spread the lies?

      He was also on Hannity and said the same things. He wonders if CNN would lie? Would Anderson?

    • Tim Pawlenty: CNN Obama’s Birth Certificate

      • This is the EXACT same recitation he made on Hannity, but not as well practiced. On Hannity, he stumbled over his prepared comments, probably because he knew Hannity was skeptical as was the audience. Mika is a minion, so Pawlenty was more comfortable telling her what she wanted to hear, although she probably would prefer for all Republicans to be “birthers” because THEY THINK that’s a winning argument for them–the RACE CARD.

        Pawlenty, as I said last night, is quickly losing at least one potential voter. If he is THIS AFRAID of the media, because he’s THAT afraid that they will tar him as a bigoted racist simply for expecting all POTUS candidates to prove that they’re eligible under the REQUIREMENTS of the Constitution, then of what use would he be facing down someone like I’m-a-nutjob, Vlad, or Hu? Who? I digress . . .

        This is very disturbing. It appears that the media have gone back to their former plan. They REALIZE now that they’ve been rope-a-doped by Trump. Do you see them asking BARRY for HIS original long-form, now that Trump’s shown his? I looked for but did not see Trump’s long form on the news (even FOX) last night. Did you see it anywhere? They’re not showing it because they know it will resonate with people who will compare it to that digital image CNN “saw” and notice the huge differences.

        Their plan is to force EVERY Republican candidate to cry uncle. To force them so speak thusly, “Barry was born in the USA; CNN said so.” Say it or else. Or else WHAT?

        OF WHAT are they so freaking afraid? If a potential POTUS cannot stand up to the US media, then that person is useless as a president.

        We the People, 9 out of 10 of us, EXPECT Obama to prove his eligibility. How can I say that? Because 9 of 10 say they suspect he’s INELIGIBLE. Why do they suspect this, other than that it’s an obvious FACT? Because We the People have COMMON SENSE which is SADLY LACKING in the complicit lamestream media and apparently also the Republican Party.

        Who do We the People like (or at least I do)? Sarah Palin, Allen West, Chris Christie, Herman Cain, Donald Trump, the late Ronald Reagan, Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Ambassador Bolton, Donald Rumsfeld. Why do we like them? BECAUSE THEY’RE STRAIGHT TALKERS. They say what they mean and mean what they say. Heck, I even like Dennis Kucinich for the same reason: He’s consistent. He isn’t a toady. He actually believes the stuff he says. No matter how wrong he may be at times, at LEAST he is intellectually honest. He’s not acting. He’s not, apparently, an Obama STOOGE.

        I like what Pawlenty says when he’s talking policy. I like what he says about the deficit and the wrong track we are on. I DO NOT LIKE his apparent fear of the media. This is RINO-like in it’s stupidity. It makes me suspicious of him.

        It makes me, for one, wonder if Pawlenty, like McCain, is in on whatever conspiracy of silence allowed Barry to get where he is and stay there. Whatever conspiracy is allowing him to run again for the presidency, when all the scandals associated with his administration are ignored, any ONE of which would have sunk other presidents. Just compare the MANY scandals in this administration to what happened to Nixon. Watergate? SMALL POTATOES.

        • When I think of Pawlenty I ALWAYS remember the 4 Paws Circus I researched a few years ago when researching O.
          I ALWAYS think of that.

        • He is being slaughtered on the blogs for his statements.

          Below is the Pawlenty for president site. Perhaps you would like educate him. I did. Add your favorite site for his education. Make sure to say that CNN is a leftist network. He needs to know the constitutional requirements since he is running for the office. Are his opponents eligible? Obama isn’t!


          • Here’s what I wrote on Pawlenty’s site:

            The Next President Should… Support and Defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law!

            Supporting and defending the Constitution and the Rule of Law
            makes one a “Constitutional Republican”, not a “birther”.

            When one combines the legal requirements of…
            1) Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution

            2) Section 3 of the 20th Amendment to the United States Constitution

            3) The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986:

            “All employees, citizens and noncitizens, hired after November 6, 1986 and working in the United States must complete a Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.”
            … then one sees that Obama and Biden are legally required to produce hard copy documentation of not only their eligibility to work in the United states but also their eligibility to hold the office of President.

            And Congress has the legal responsibility to ensure that the President and Vice President have qualified.

            A Constitutional Republican expects those who swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law to ACTUALLY DO SO.

            I will not support a primary candidate who does not support and defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

            Is the President above the law? Obama was legally required to submit an I-9 form with acceptable hard copy documentation. Did he do so? Shouldn’t you care whether or not he did so? Don’t let the Alinsky media intimidate you. Stand up for the Constitution and the Rule of Law, or don’t even think of running for President!

  31. It is Open Line Wednesday on Rush.

    Call and email in with NBC Questions

  32. Standing Under Proposed State Presidential Vetting and Eligibility Laws
    By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    March 30, 2011 Snips

    The Founders and Framers understood that under natural law and the law of nations, as explained by Emer de Vattel in his, The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758), a nation’s most fundamental duty is self-preservation. They therefore included the “natural born Citizen” clause in the Constitution so that each and every citizen would be protected by having someone assume and exercise the great and singular civil and military powers of the President and Commander in Chief with only their and the nation’s values and safety at heart. To accomplish that end, the Founders and Framers required that anyone born after the adoption of the Constitution be born in the United States to U.S. citizen parents.


  33. Pill, no replies left on your comment.

    Excellent. Hopefully, Pawlenty reads the messages left for him. What an education he is getting! I haven’t seen anyone else bring up the I-9 issue. It needs more exposure.

    People again, Share your thoughts at the Pawlenty for president site.


    • Pill, no replies left on your comment.

      Do you mean no replies left here at WTPOTUS, or no replies left at timpawlenty.com? I was able to submit my comment, but I have not been able to see that comment on his actual web site. Are you able to see it there? If so, how? The following link always takes me to a page where you can submit a new comment, but not see prior comments…


      • I meant no replies left to respond to your comment above. The thread was indented so much that no more replies were allowed.

        No I didn’t see open comments at Pawlenty’s. Those sure would be interesting to see though.

  34. Political Campaign Contributions by Donald Trump (1999 to Present) – $445,100

    DEMOCRAT: 59.81% REPUBLICAN: 40.19%
    HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT Democrat -2,300 11/10/2009
    HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT Democrat -1,700 11/09/2009
    HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT Democrat 600 11/12/2007
    FRIENDS OF HILLARY Democrat 200 11/01/2006
    FRIENDS OF HILLARY Democrat 1,000 12/02/2005
    FRIENDS OF HILLARY Democrat 900 09/30/2005
    FRIENDS OF HILLARY Democrat 1,000 03/23/2005
    FRIENDS OF HILLARY Democrat 1,000 05/01/2002


    • It’s very common for busines interests to support both sides. For a man of Trump’s wealth, it doesn’t seem like that much in a year. I would be very concerned if he would support someone like the evil Obummer. I have to be honest, I’m as MAD at the Republicans as the Democrats. We need our Constitution and Democracy back!

    • Considering the size of The Donald’s assets, these aren’t huge sums. Middle class people donate more than that to people like Hillary Clinton (unfortunately). This is small change compared to “donations” by billionaires like Soros. It seems he’s not very political for a billionaire.

      On average, then, he gives about $40,000 per year to politicial causes, almost equally divided between Democrats and Republicans. Keep in mind the likely make-up of the political class in the urban areas where most of Trump’s businesses operate. Businessmen make donations based upon local issues that affect their businesses.

      So he gave Hillary Clinton $8700 over 7 years.

      In 2010, he gave over $30,000 to the Republican Senatorial Committee; in 2007, he gave the same Republican committee $20,000.
      In 2008, he gave $28,450 to McCain for POTUS.
      In 2001, he gave the Republican Congressional Committee $10,000.

      In 2008, he gave the Democratic Senatorial Committee $25,000; in 2004, he gave the same Democratic committee $25,000.
      In 2006, he gave the Democratic Congressional Commitee $20,000.
      In 2002, he gave the DSCC (Dem. Senatorial Campaign Committee) $25,000.

      So it appears that the large sums were divided between the parties, with more going to Democrats, but considering where his businesses operate, that’s not surprising.

  35. This one is a surprise. I didn’t realize that Orly elevated this case to the 9th circuit after being dismissed by the Marine >>Judge Carter.

    9th Circuit Court to hear eligibility questions

    ‘We hope they see the merits in the constitutional arguments’
    March 30, 2011 8:19 pm Eastern

    Arguments in a lawsuit on Barack Obama’s eligibility that has been percolating through the federal court system in California since the 2008 election will be heard at the appellate level in just a few weeks.

    Officials with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals today notified attorneys representing several dozen individuals – members of the military, members of state government and even a candidate for president – that oral arguments will be held May 2

    “I can’t believe it, but after two years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of appeals scheduled oral argument in [the] Obama case,” wrote Orly Taitz, a California attorney who has litigated a number of challenges to Obama.

    “This is [the] Judge Carter case, where I represent Ambassador Alan Keyes, 10 state representatives and 30 members of [the] U.S. military,” she wrote in her blog confirmation of the plans.

    The case challenges Obama’s eligibility to be president, citing a lack of documentation, and was the subject of hearings at the lower court level, where Judge David Carter heard arguments.


    • Interesting how all is happening at the same time no ?

    • Civil Case Against Obama Scheduled for Oral Arguments on May 2

      March 30

      WorldNetDaily is reporting that an appellate court has scheduled a hearing on the merits of a lawsuit filed by California attorney and dentist Orly Taitz more than two years ago.

      The case Wiley Drake v. Obama will be heard by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, according to Taitz, who, in addition to challenging Barack Hussein Obama on his constitutional eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief, claims that Obama has also lied about his attendance at Columbia University in the early 1980s.

      Also today, The Post & Email has been told that radio show host Doug Urbanski discussed the incarcerations of both Lt. Col. Lakin and LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick on his nationally-broadcast show.

      Of the national broadcast, Fitzpatrick said, “This is a new development. It’s the first time Lt. Col. Lakin’s case or mine has received national coverage. Something’s happening here.

      LCDR Walter Fitzpatrick has filed a second treason complaint against Obama, as have several thousand U.S. citizens.


        • My sentiments exactly! Will the DOJ stack the deck? Who is the judge? We watched Judge Carter capitulate, will the next judge do so? This is just a hearing?

          PASADENA, Calif. (ABP) — Nearly two-and-a-half years into his term, a federal appeals court has agreed to hear oral arguments in a case alleging that Barack Obama is not eligible to serve as president of the United States.

          “Praise the Lord Jesus,” plaintiff Wiley Drake, pastor of First Southern Baptist Church in Buena Park, Calif., commented on word that the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had scheduled a hearing on his case May 2.

  36. http://www.gazette.com/articles/springs-115381-colorado-obama.html#ixzz1I76SkVka

    “A Colorado Springs [epithet deleted; banned word], retired Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister, has Internet blogs abuzz with what may be an illegal foray into an online Social Security data base and how he obtained a copy of President Barack Obama’s draft registration from 1980.

    ‘Col. Greg Hollister, USAF (Ret.) contacted the Selective Service, falsely impersonated President Obama, improperly registered his own address as President Obama’s address, and by this false impersonation and identity theft he managed to obtain a duplicate registration acknowledgement card with President Obama’s Selective Service information on it,’ a blogger posted on gratewire.com last week. ‘This may violate several federal criminal statutes, and apparently caused the federal record of President Obama’s address with the Selective Service to be altered to show that he lives in Colorado Springs, CO.‘”

    So what I want to know is did this happen or is it supposition? If they charge Hollister, will he have standing and discovery? Will he be a protected whistleblower? Will he be applauded like Julian ASSange?

    “Hollister denied breaking any laws.

    ‘I was very meticulous and made sure everything I did was compliant with the law,’ Hollister said, noting that he sent Obama an 1099 tax form.

    A 1099 is an IRS income reporting form for independent contractors and free-lancers. Hollister did not explain how sending that to Obama complies with federal laws on the use of Social Security data.”

    So what’s up with that 1099? Is it because Hollister is (and the rest of us are, too) Barry’s employer? Bwahahahahah! Papoose–my favorite word of today. Bwahahahahah. 🙂

    • Wednesday, March 30, 2011
      Col. Hollister Facing Legal Trouble for Verifying that Obama’s Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants was Never Issued.
      ObamaRelease YourRecords on 4:32 PM

      As previously reported here, Colonel Gregory Hollister verified via the Social Security Number Verification Service that Obama’s social security number was “never issued” even though Obama used the social security number in his Selective Service Registration.

      The Obots are doing their best to have Col. Hollister prosecuted for verifying the number via the database. I guess they don’t understand that Obama works for us which makes Obama our EMPLOYEE. Got Standing!?


      • Obots are outing Obama themselves by saying the information Hollister obtained is correct! I guess they are trying to make Hollister the villain instead of looking at Obama’s fraud! Thank Dr. Con for getting this started on his blog.

        “Retired Air Force Col. Gregory Hollister impersonated Obama with the Selective Service and managed to get a card with President Obama’s Selective Service information on it, a blogger posted on gratewire.com last week.”

        • That’s a good point. They deny that’s his SS# but then they want Hollister charged with a crime for getting the record (that one with the typo on it?) Bwahahahahah!

          Don’t you love it how for years they’ve ridiculed document experts who analyze the FAKE COLB, accusing them of being victims of Asperger’s Syndrome or crazed conspiracy theorists, and yet we’re supposed to believe some anonymous person who claims to know how to READ BAR CODES?! Oh, how clever he was. He traced the bar code to Hollister’s house. Right. I invite these people to see everything we’ve TRACED about this POTUS and his fabulous fake family for the past two years. I’ll believe their evidence when they believe ours. They ridiculed all over the place about how he didn’t have a CT SS#. Now they’re claiming that’s his number. But what about the other numbers he used? It’s crazy. They’re crazy. But no, we’re supposed to be crazy. What’s more important, btw? A retired Air Force Colonel who impersonates somebody in order to get a decades old Selective Service document, or a person of dubious origin who impersonates a natural born citizen of the United States of America in order to fool the people into voting for a person who doesn’t exist, so that he can become the most powerful person in the world–that being US president? Hmmm? Which crime is greater? Which FRAUD is more serious, all things considered?

          And Hollister is correct if this is his argument: Obama works for us. As Red Pill already reported, he was required to document all this information in order to become a federal employee. So where’s THAT documentation, too?


          A report released about all the shenanigans in the Obama administration with regard to FOIA requests. One of the lawyers tried to walk out of the committee with THEIR DOCUMENTS, which is THEFT. He even tried to keep them in his briefcase AFTER BEING CAUGHT RED HANDED. Took a page from Sandy Burglar, I suppose. But he was just “sloppy.”

          It becomes more and more obvious that there is a SERIOUS problem in this country, especially amongst Obama supporters, with intellectual honesty, morality, and ethics.

          Gee, couldn’t this lawyer be disbarred for attempting to STEAL documents that belong to Congress? That sounds EXTREMELY serious to me.

          • Gee, couldn’t this lawyer be disbarred for attempting to STEAL documents that belong to Congress? That sounds EXTREMELY serious to me.

            Yes it sure is Miri. Document theft by an attorney.THEFT.

          • Miri, Let’s talk about the thief attorney…It is that name thing again Miri and he has all 3….


          • I am posting on circle of names story too Miri. I will continue it there and place a link here to it;

            More Hope and Change…
            A key congressional committee accused the Obama Department of Homeland Security of non-cooperation, witness tampering and even attempted theft of committee documents. The report claims that DHS Attorney Reid Alan Cox attempted to leave a committee hearing room with the Committee’s exhibits in his bag.
            FOX News reported:


          • Why the Circle of Names, Round and Round, Over and Over? Part 2 | We the People of the United States
            Renee | March 31, 2011 at 2:01 pm | Reply
            Attorney tries to steal official documents in his briefcase. Look at his names !

  37. Here’s an article that shows the difference between the two camps: Those who simply ask that candidates prove eligibility, and those who prefer to stick their heads in the sand, like see-no-evil monkeys, and ignore the rule of law because they WANT who they WANT despite the LAW:


    Notice how logically, sensibly, and maturely the pro-evidence person argues, while the appropriately named “Dick” Ellis resorts to name calling, demonization, and even cursing–a perfect example of Alinsky 101. He must resort to playing the race card and insulting his opponents because HE HAS NO LOGICAL ARGUMENTS TO OFFER. BECAUSE THERE ARE NONE.

    • Compare and contrast! What a exemplary example of a journalist who has done his job, knows his material, and writes concisely and logically. Well done William Lolli! As for the other joker, Dick Ellis; San Diego should fire your a@@ for being unable to answer even one question out of 5. Not one! There wasn’t even an example provided that showed you even investigated or understood the issue. Your opinion, not worth one red cent. You proved your ignorance and failed the assignment. I must admit it is most difficult to offer an opposing viewpoint or argument when there is absolutely no verified or documented evidence to back-up a claim. Mr. Ellis showed himself to be a bluffer. Ellis’ name doesn’t appear on the JournOlist, but he may be a member under a pseudo-name. What a disgusting writer, if one can even call him that.

      I am amazed that the Editor chose to publish those two comparisons. I question his abilities now too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s