Puerto Rico Our 51st State? Why Now?

Puerto Rico Democracy Act

Legislation Biased in Favor of Statehood

Posted by Bridgette

Why Now and Without a Referendum by the Residents of Puerto Rico?  The Vote is Thursday, April 29th!  A refounder called and told Glenn Beck about this vote.  According to Wiki, if Puerto Rico were a U.S. state, it would rank 27th in population, and have six seats in the House of Representatives.  Puerto Rico is now a US Commonwealth. Is this being done now without the consent of resident Puerto Ricans to add to the Democratic voters in November? Why is this major bill not being covered by the mainstream media?

Congress isn’t asking if Puerto Rico wants to be a state. When they were asked before if they wanted statehood, they said, NO! they didn’t want to become a state. They voted on it 3 times..not once, but three times, and the answer was No!

They already receive many of the benefits that are available to US citizens. This bill is about the November election and adding voters to the Democratic Party. Period. Anyone that doesn’t vote for this bill will be accused of racism by the 4.13 million Puerto Ricans living in the US and headed up and inflamed by the Democrats.

The New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico is pushing this vote and it is their party platform. According to Wiki, “The New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico (NPP) is a political party that advocates for Puerto Rico’s admission to the United States of America as the 51st state.”

This is another Democrat trick. Send emails or call your reps today…tomorrow will be to late! If this passes, will this again prove that no one reads the bill?

From the Heritage Foundation
April 27, 2010

According to Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD), the House will vote on H.R. 2499, the Puerto Rico Democracy Act, later this week. The legislation provides Puerto Rico a two stage voting process and makes some non-resident Puerto Ricans eligible to vote on Puerto Rican statehood. This legislation has rigged the process in favor of making Puerto Rico the 51st state and is not a fair way to force statehood on a Commonwealth whose people may not want it. Furthermore, this may be an expensive proposition for the American people who are already on the hook for approximately $12.9 trillion in national debt.

This bill attempts to rig the voting process and denies the American people a real say on the issue of whether they want to allow Puerto Rico to be granted statehood. The fact of the matter is that Puerto Ricans have rejected statehood numerous times and this bill seems to have been written in a way to fast track statehood without a majority of Puerto Ricans favoring the idea.

Furthermore, the people of the United States should be allowed a vote on whether they want to admit Puerto Rico as a new state. If the people of Puerto Rico can vote, the people of the United States should have a vote.

The legislation contains many questionable provisions. First, the legislation sets up a voting process rigged for success. The legislation sets up a preliminary vote and the voters are given two options. If a majority of Puerto Ricans vote in favor of changing the status of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to “a different political status,” then a second vote would be scheduled to poll voters on the following three options:

1.“Independence: Puerto Rico should become fully independent from the United States;”

2.“Sovereignty in Association with the United States: Puerto Rico and the United States should form a political association between sovereign nations that will not be subject to the Territorial Clause of the United States Constitution;” and,

3.“Statehood: Puerto Rico should be admitted as a State of the Union.”

Clearly, a plurality of the people of Puerto Rico could vote for “Statehood” without a majority of the people voting ever supporting the idea. The people of Puerto Rico have rejected statehood three times and it seems that this vote is set up to allow a simply plurality of the people to carry the day.

Another odd provision allows non-resident Puerto Ricans to vote on statehood for the Commonwealth. The bill states that “all United States citizens born in Puerto Rico who comply, to the satisfaction of the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission, with all Commission requirements (other than the residency requirement) applicable to eligibility to vote in a general election in Puerto Rico.” Residency requirements may be waived, because Puerto Ricans living in the states would naturally favor statehood for the Commonwealth.

This provision allows non-resident Puerto Ricans to undermine the will of the residents of the Commonwealth. According to the U.S. Census, there are more Puerto Ricans residing in the 50 states, than in the proposed 51st state. The estimates as part of the American Community Survey estimates that out of the 301 million people in the United States, 4.13 million are of Puerto Rican descent. The Census also estimates that the population of Puerto Rico is a mere 3.97 million. This would allow for the will of the residents of the Commonwealth to be overridden by people who have chosen to move to one of the 50 states.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) put out a report dated July 28, 2009 on H.R. 2499. The CBO report estimated that there would be no score for this bill, because it only authorizes a vote, but if Puerto Rico was granted statehood the cost would be massive. My boss, Edwin Feulner wrote in 1997 piece titled Do We Need a 51st State? “in an era of government downsizing and balanced budgets, it would increase entitlement spending (welfare, Medicare, Social Security) by an estimated $3 billion per year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.” Those arguments still hold water today. The Lexington Institute argues that “Puerto Rico, which received $18 billion in direct federal expenditures in FY 2008, has a population with a median national income of $17,741, nearly a third below that for the United States. While eligibility for many major federal social programs is the same in both jurisdictions, others, like the Food Stamp Program, include different eligibility requirements. This would likely result in increased federal expenditures should statehood be achieved, but a lack of comparable data makes cost projections for such changes difficult.” It is clear that the cost of statehood to the taxpayers will be high.

The Puerto Rico Democracy Act has some serious flaws. The votes seem to be set up in a way that favors statehood. The two provisions that allow a plurality of Puerto Ricans to vote for statehood to be ratified and the allowing of non-resident Puerto Ricans to vote in the plebiscite is of deep concern to those who favor a fair vote and referendum on statehood. A vote by members of Congress is not enough to indicate consent of the American people for Puerto Rican statehood. If the Obamacare vote and secretive procedure is instructive, many Members of Congress are willing to defy the will of their own constituents.


50 responses to “Puerto Rico Our 51st State? Why Now?

  1. Democrats rushing through Puerto Rico power grab
    April 28, 2010 Snips

    Quietly sailing through the House this week is yet another piece of partisan stealth legislation aimed at manufacturing more Democrat power at the expense of the American people, the economy and the country.

    But still, desperate to create new Democrat voters and elected officials, the left is now aggressively setting the stage for the creation of a 51st state.

    Due to its dense population of poverty-stricken minorities, Puerto Rico can be counted on to vote overwhelmingly for Democrats and all their handouts, and their representation will also consequently outnumber that of 25 other existing U.S. states.

    Meanwhile, with Puerto Ricans having an average income of less than half that of our poorest state, they will instantly become eligible for dozens of our welfare programs. Truckloads of taxpayer dollars will also have to be perpetually dumped into the territory, by federal law, to bring it up to American infrastructure and environmental standards.

    This will also force the U.S. to become a bi-lingual country overnight, which will produce a whole new set of problems.


    • Bridgette, thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention. I wrote my representative, not that it will do any good because they don’t listen to or care about We the People, anymore.

      Check out this rogue’s gallery of sponsors:

      Mr. PIERLUISI (for himself, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. ARCURI, Mr. BAIRD, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. BOUSTANY, Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida, Mr. BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. CASTLE, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. COSTA, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. DENT, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FARR, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. FLAKE, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. GERLACH, Mr. GRAYSON, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. HARE, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HOYER, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KILDEE, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. KRATOVIL, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. MACK, Mr. MAFFEI, Ms. MARKEY of Colorado, Mr. MASSA, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. MICA, Mr. MOLLOHAN, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. NORTON, Mr. OLVER, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. PENCE, Mr. POE of Texas, Mr. POLIS of Colorado, Mr. PUTNAM, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. REYES, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Mr. SABLAN, Mr. SALAZAR, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SHULER, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. STARK, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. TONKO, Mr. WALZ, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. WATSON, Mr. WATT, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. WU, Mr. YARMUTH, and Mr. YOUNG of Alaska.

      Round up the usual suspects. Every race-baiter in Congress to be found on that list. Notice Abercrombie and Faleomavaega , once again carrying water for Zero.

  2. Rigging an Election in Puerto Rico
    April 28, 2010 Snips

    Yet this bill would force another vote — and if Puerto Ricans reject statehood again, the Puerto Rican government (which is controlled by the rabidly pro-statehood New Progressive Party) would be authorized to conduct additional plebiscites every eight years, forever — in other words, until they finally get the results they want. There would only be two choices in the first new plebiscite: continuation of the status quo or “a different political status.” If the “different political status” choice wins, then a second plebiscite will be held in which the only choices will be statehood, independence, or “Sovereignty in Association with the United States,” whatever that is supposed to mean.

    …no majority is required to win this second vote, just a plurality. So Puerto Ricans could be forced into statehood (or independence) even if only a minority of voters are in favor of it. And the vote is further rigged by specifying that anyone born in Puerto Rico will be able to vote — even if they are not residents. There are more expatriate Puerto Ricans living in the U.S. than there are in Puerto Rico. According to ProEnglish, the cost of additional federal benefits and entitlements to Puerto Ricans if the island becomes a state would be more than $7 billion a year.

    Robert DePosada, a senior adviser to the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders, says that if the NPP gets what it wants in the plebiscites, it will then elect senators and congressmen and send them to Washington to “demand” their seats the same way Tennessee did in 1796 (this is in the party’s platform). The party’s leader and former island governor has said that members of Congress will then be forced to support statehood to “avoid being accused of bigotry against Hispanics.” So the plan is to rig an election and then extort approval from Congress of Puerto Rico as the 51st state.

    …citizens are faced with a manipulative bill that political observers will recognize as designed to create millions of new votes at a time when certain political actors fear their election prospects are diminishing.


    • The way I understand this, in the past, Puerto Ricans voted against statehood because they currently enjoy something like the best of both worlds: They get federal benefits but they don’t pay the sort of federal taxes that We the People must. However, if you read this bill carefully, you will see that they are given only two sets of choices:

      1. Status quo or Change

      2. If Change, then now choose among

      Independence (no more US federal benefits)

      New alliance (probably no more US federal benefits. Not yet defined, but will be made as unappetizing as possible, no doubt, because there is wording about losing “territorial” status.)

      Statehood (US benefits, plus voting rights, plus representation, plus get to enjoy redistribution of US wealth, plus (with all Zero’s changes) probably will never hit the threshold where any individual Puerto Rican has to pay US taxes instead of making money via “tax credits.” What a deal! But not for We the People, who will have to pay for all these Third World new “citizens”.)

      In sum: The first two choices will certainly be rejected by most Puerto Ricans, leaving them with Statehood. And it looks as if all any option needs is one vote more than 1/3 of the total votes.

      How dishonest and shameful can these guys get?

      Bottom line: Even IF the Puerto Ricans show up in DC with “senators” and “representatives”, the US Congress STILL has to vote to admit them as a state. At that point, the rubber will meet the road.

  3. Snips

    Puerto Rico – 51st State? Congress Scrambling to Make it So

    No Member of Congress who describes himself as a limited government, fiscal conservative should be casting a YEA vote for H.R. 2499, as Puerto Rican statehood would cause an immediate increase in federal expenditures, particularly for taxpayer-funded welfare state services.

    Sponsored by Puerto Rican delegate Pedro Pierluisi (D), the Puerto Rico Democracy Act (H.R. 2499) – which has reared its ugly head a number of times over the past few congresses but has yet to have any success – would require Puerto Ricans to hold a national referendum to decide if they want Puerto Rico to remain a self-governing U.S. commonwealth, or become the 51st state.


    • Interesting, Pedro Pierluisi is referring his constituents to this blog.

      I sure hope they are reading what the consequences and the truth of the matter is here.

      Is Pedro a New Party Progressive supporter?

  4. Vote is today! Call or email your representatives! Critical Glenn Beck Video -must watch all 20 minutes to “GET IT”

  5. “This Is Alabama; We Speak English” Governor Candidate Says
    Thursday, April 29

    Amid a national debate over Arizona’s tough new immigration law, Republican Alabama gubernatorial candidate Tim James (and son of previous Gov. Fob James) vows in a new campaign ad that if he’s elected, he’ll give the state driver’s license exam only in English, as a cost-saving measure. “This is Alabama; we speak English,” he says in the ad. “If you want to live here, learn it.”

    “I have come under attack and under assault by a very interesting group of far-left reporters,” he said Monday, according to the Birmingham News. He said English exams are a public safety issue, to ensure drivers can read signs. Exams are currently given in Arabic, Chinese, English, Farsi, French, German, Greek, Japanese, Korean, Russian, Spanish, Thai and Vietnamese, according to AOL News.


  6. Sign the Petition folks.

    H.R. 2499 sign it and spread the word fast!!!!.

  7. Ramping up the leftist noise and taking it to the extreme!

    Arizona COMMUNIST appeals for help to fight illegal immigration bill

    Leading Tuscon Communist Party USA member, Carolyn Trowbridge has appealed for Party help in fighting Arizona’s new “get tough on illegal immigration” Bill (SB 1070).

    Writing in the Peoples World of April 26, Trowbridge who triples as chair of the Communist Party’s Women’s Commission , vice president of the Arizona ACLU and as a leading immigration activist, expressed her anger at the new law.

    “We are tired of being the laughing stock of the U.S., we are tired of being threatened, we are more than tired, WE ARE REALLY PISSED OFF. And we want the rest of you to also be pissed off. One reason our legislature and governor think they can get away with this crap is that no one else in the country is paying attention or cares.”

    Trowbridge went on to compare the Bill, which merely seeks to enforce already existing federal guidelines, with Apartheid and even “ethnic cleansing”.

    “So we can use some loud voices in support of the national economic boycott of Arizona called by Raul Grijalva. Already the American Immigration Lawyers Association has dropped plans to hold their convention here. If you know of any other organizations who are planning events here, if you know people who are planning vacations (the Grand Canyon is fabulous but stay away until it is safe to come), moving a business, buying anything from us (especially citrus and other agricultural items), tell them to stop. We are fighting against our own apartheid, our own flirtation with ethnic cleansing.”

    • What kind of spin is that ?

      If you know of any other organizations who are planning events here, if you know people who are planning vacations (the Grand Canyon is fabulous but stay away until it is safe to come)

      Until Grand Canyon is safe ?

      That is a very desperate statement. It is a whole lot safer at that canyon then around Az.
      It would be a whole lot safer in AZ if immigration laws are enforced. How does she twist it all around ?
      What a spin doktor she is.

  8. Bridgette,

    As Miri states above, I also thank you for bringing this to everyone’s attention. I know renee posted a great article on this subject last night.

    This article; Puerto Rican Officials Scrap Millions of Birth Certificates, was posted on aol new’s on the 21st of this month. I saved the article because I new something was up.

    Puerto Rican Officials Scrap Millions of Birth CertificatesUpdated: 7 days 20 hours ago

    (April 21) — In a dramatic bid to end fraud, identity theft and illegal immigration, Puerto Rico is voiding all birth certificates issued before July 1, 2010 — forcing more than 5 million people to apply for new ones.

    The move will “protect the identity of all Puerto Ricans born on the island, and at the same time help the federal government with national security issues,” Luis Balzac, spokesman for the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration, said in a phone interview with AOL News.

    According to the U.S. departments of State and Homeland Security, Puerto Rican birth certificates account for about 40 percent of all cases of passport fraud every year, ABC reports.


    • That is weird..they will issue 5 million new birth certificates because of “national security issues.” What security issue? Are they too easy to photoshop like the Usurpers?

      Who are all those people that are using Puerto Rican birth certificates to get passports and where are they originating from? 40% of all fraudulent cases involve them. Have they found that these were being duplicated in suspect countries?

    • Wow, Leza…this is way on past weird, as the world turns….upside down…sooo very strange?!

  9. Why the rush on the Puerto Rico statehood bill? (Rep. Luis Gutierrez)
    By Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) – 04/29/10 10:04 AM ET

    H.R. 2499, the Puerto Rico statehood bill was brought to the House this week after a surprise announcement last Thursday. Debate on this bill has been severely limited by the way Democratic Leaders are managing the process. Democratic Puerto Rican Members of Congress are being shut out of the process and will be severely limited in their ability to debate the bill and offer amendments. Under the current Democratic Leadership, there will be less opportunity for Members and for the people of Puerto Rico to gain a better understanding of the bill.

    So, what is up with this Puerto Rico statehood bill?

    In my opinion, this bill is the political equivalent of a shady Goldman Sachs derivative: It’s secretive. It lacks transparency. It’s likely to blow up down the road and cause systemic risk to our democracy. And those who put this political derivative together don’t really tell you what this is really about and will play dumb when it explodes.

    I get more time to debate renaming a Post Office than I will get to debate a bill that could make Puerto Rico the fifty-first state.


  10. Huh? They get how much??? Hmmm..I’m not Catholic; did you guys know they (the Church org) got this much money ????

    Catholic Church Facilitates Foreign Invasion
    By Cliff Kincaid | April 29, 2010

    Many Americans don’t realize that the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which receives a federal tax exemption as a non-profit entity, gets one-third of its annual $146 million budget from the government.

    The controversy over Arizona’s immigration law should be used to highlight the shameful role of the Roman Catholic Church in facilitating the foreign invasion of the U.S.

    This scandal deserves as much attention as the seemingly never-ending cases of sexual child abuse involving priests.

    In a major embarrassment for followers of the U.S. Catholic Church, Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles compared Arizona’s new law to “German Nazi and Russian Communist techniques.” He actually wrote this on his personal blog, under the headline, “Arizona’s Dreadful Anti-Immigrant Law.”

    Mahony is described by the Los Angeles Times as “a nationally influential figure who heads the nation’s largest Roman Catholic archdiocese with 4.3 million members.” In other words, he is not a fringe player. Indeed, he is typical of Catholic Church leaders.

    Why do Catholic officials want to encourage illegal immigration? The answer is quite simple. Most of the illegal aliens are Catholics. Plus, the church makes lots of government money by hosting and serving the immigrants.

    These facts are considered by some to be anti-Catholic, which is why you seldom read or hear about them in the major media. But the fact is that millions of American Catholics are disgusted and outraged by the Catholic hierarchy’s statements and antics on this issue. They are organizing across the country.



    P.S. My computer has been down over a week now…all of you have been doing a wooonnnnderful job….now if I can just get caught up on all these astounding fact finds !!!

  11. I’m dropping this here, but if you would like me to place it elsewhere, let me know!! I snipped this from the middle of a very long, but in-depth article that gives both sides of the argument. Although we have read numerous pieces about our precious Constitution, this is another MUST READ imo! VERY bad timing…it MUST NOT happen now!!! Consequences devastating!!!
    Powerful Forces Now Calling for Constitutional Convention
    Arguing the advantages of the Con Con, Fruth says, “Can you imagine the excitement in the nation leading up to the Convention? Schools will have to dust off history books which teach how our nation was founded. Many people for the first time will read the Constitution. The issue will be discussed at length, exposing what happened to our country over the years.”

    Fruth then scoffs at our fears of a Con Con and efforts to stop it. He says, “Simply, it is not reasonable to assume there can be enough delegates sent to a convention who will propose amendments which ‘repeal the Bill of Rights’ or ‘legalize socialism.’ Even if they did, the amendments would never be ratified,” concludes Fruth.

    Anticipating opposition to his scheme for a Con Con, Fruth says that those who opposed the effort in the 1980’s, to call for a Con Con for a balanced budget amendment, told the American people that the delegates at the convention can “change the Constitution any way they want.” Argues Fruth, “We know that is not true.” He says, “it is both irresponsible and disingenuous for anyone to publicly say that the convention can change the Constitution.” And he says, “any recommended changes must be approved by three-fourths of the states.”

    These are the arguments now being presented to every single state legislator and Governor in the nation as Fruth and ALEC put on a full-court-press to call for a Constitutional Convention. While the intention may be an honest desire to reign in the power of government, the fact remains that every one of these arguments for a Con Con is wrong.

    The fact is, once 34 states petition Congress to convene a Constitutional Convention, the matter is completely out of the States’ hands. There is absolutely no ability to control what the delegates do in the convention. Attempting to instruct delegates to discuss only a specific issue like a balanced budget – or the whole package offered by the 10 Amendments for Freedom group — is absolutely impossible. Instead, once the convention starts, the delegates become super delegates which can take any action they desire concerning the Constitution. In short, at the convention the Constitution can be literally put on an operating table and the delegates can take a “scalpel” (pen) to it and change any section or even the entire document if they desire.

    What proof do I offer? Here are the exact words of Article V of the Constitution: “…on the application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, (Congress) shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which…shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States.”

    Article V gives absolutely no guidelines as to how it will be run, how delegates can be selected and who can do the selecting. Once the 34 states make the request, the entire matter is in the hands of Congress to decide. It does not matter if the states passed resolutions as Fruth proposes, containing absolute guidelines for delegate selection. The Constitution provides no rules -…..


    God Bless the United States of America

    • It was a worthwhile article Peach. I don’t think this is the time for a Con-con since the agenda can’t be controlled. Great ideas for additions, but amendments and or laws would work instead. I think it would be frightening to have the Marxists/communists do anything to tamper with the real document. They are the ones that believe it is outmoded and should be a “living” document and it should change. At this point, change is not a word that is associated with anything positive. I cringe when I hear it…even when it involves pennies, nickles, and dimes!

  12. The left has rallied the AFL-CIO to protest on Wall Street today. Of course, they railing against banks…those evil banks. Signs say, “HOLD BANKS ACCOUNTABLE”, and “BANKS MUST PAY!” and “MAKE Wall
    Street Pay! Was this orchestrated by Podesta, Moveon.org, and Axelrod?

    I wonder how much they are paid for their participation today. Union members…not working? Why isn’t the union helping them out? Perhaps they are using those union dues to pay them to carry a sign.

    Is the MSM carrying the stories about them? Are they saying there are 20,000 people there instead of 200? Is it a case of reverse counting and exaggeration compared to Tea Parties?

    • Just a short segment on Cavuto’s show on FOX and saw a sign that said:


      So Van Jones’ group is present. Was the guy advertising Apollo as the Looter or just saying he was representing Apollo? I am extremely concerned that it appears that there weren’t any white people in the crowd as they panned the audience. Is the AFL-CIO racist?

  13. BUY “Arizona Ice Tea” to support the AZ State government for enacting laws to protect their citizens!

    The Leftists are wanting people to boycott Arizona Ice Tea. The idiots that started the boycott didn’t research the manufacturer. It is made and bottled in New York! Ooopsie…jokes on them.

    Their latest attack is on the Arizona Diamondbacks at a game in Chicago.

    AZ Razorbacks! Watch out…anything with the name of AZ is being targeted. Might that be the university students or the baseball team?

  14. We the People are holding up the vote on Puerto Rico so far because of the calls and emails to Reps according to Beck! Congressmen were said to say, “they lied to us.” Meaning those that were sponsoring the bill.

    The vote has been rescheduled several times already. Now it should happen around 6 pm EST. He is watching the Congress and giving updates.

    • They say they lied to them ! Guess they are not guily of failing to read ? Is that not a big part of their job to read what they sign ?

      Boys, do your job and READ before you sign.
      I am a nobody, but even I know to read before I put my name on something legal..come on guys !
      You are supposed to be the backbone of America.
      STAND TALL !

    • This is confusing. Read that article I linked. This reporter says the second vote in Puerto Rico will have FOUR options, not the three previous noted. The reporter says they will again be allowed to vote for the status quo. One wonders how they will decide which is the winning choice? 25% plus one vote? Was the bill amended? I don’t see that on the legislature’s website, but they may be behind in transcription.

  15. omg,, has anyone read this yet?

    Army Preps for Tea Party ‘Terrorists’

    The Patriot Post ^ | 4/29/2010 | Mark Alexander

    Posted on Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:55:07 AM by tutstar


  16. Snipers on rooftops –

    New video from Gateway Pundit:

  17. This Puerto Rico bill has to go through the Senate, too, so write/call your senators.

    • I watched it on C-Span. When it passed, the Dems did such a hoop and hollar. Yes, they did add a fourth choice for them to choose from. The Governor of Puerto Rico was in the House gallery.
      Vote Yea Nay Present NV (No vote?)
      Dems 184 40 1
      Repub 39 129
      Total 223 169 1 38

  18. o/t but an excellant report.

    An investigative report detailing the Obama eligibility controversy

    By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director

    27 April 2010:

    I cannot think of any other subject in recent American history that has been so mired in controversy, so factually misrepresented, mischaracterized and so misunderstood than the matter of the eligibility of Barack Hussein OBAMA II to hold the office of President of the United States. Despite its importance, the topic has been summarily dismissed as fodder for conspiracy theorists by many, while others insist that the question of OBAMA’s citizenship has been “asked and answered.” But has it really been answered, and if not, why not?

    In consideration of the controversy that continues to plague Barack Hussein OBAMA over his citizenship status and his well documented sustained pattern of refusal to provide authenticated documentation of his birth records and numerous other pertinent records, I’ve conducted an in-depth investigation into the matter in an effort to separate fact from fiction, myth from reality. My approach was the same I’ve used as an investigator over the last 25 years on behalf of Fortune 100 companies in their selection of corporate executives, conducting due diligence background investigations. In this case, however, I was not afforded direct and unfettered access to the “applicant’s”, or in this case, OBAMA’s original records. Nonetheless, I conducted inquiries and a lengthy investigation researching the information directly or indirectly disclosed by OBAMA, as well as collections of documents, court records, official federal and state documents, verbal statements, utterances and other documents determined to be of authentic provenance.


    • No Proof

      By Douglas J. Hagmann

      Part II of an investigative series

      In the first part of this investigative report, background was provided to identify the core legal and constitutional arguments in the matter of Barack Hussein OBAMA II’s eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. Using my investigative experience, I performed this investigation in compliance with the same “industry standards” that apply to performing background investigations of individuals selected for corporate positions by Fortune 100 companies.


  19. The Left has planned protests against Arizona in 70 cities for Saturday. Will they be as peaceful as the Tea Partiers? Guess we will see if they call out the SWAT teams in any of the cities! How many people will be jailed?…we won’t hear about it.

    Great job Obama and Company for getting everyone riled up! This is a direct result of the Left being unable to read the bill so they can properly tell people what the bill is about. They have misrepresented the bill totally. Democrats need those votes in November..whatever works!

    This will pull in those that want everyone to have those micro-chips or ID cards for our identification! Another grand idea from the Democrats. Who will pay for this? Who are the people that will benefit…and what companies will be involved?

  20. Obama is now stopping all drilling in the US because of the Gulf spill. Isn’t that exactly what they wanted?

    Why would Eric Holder and about 30 lawyers from his office be in New Orleans looking into the spill? It appears they are planning to file as many lawsuits against British Petroleum that they can come up with.

  21. Newsbusters reports that MSNBC provides the best headline of the month (year?):

    During the Monday 12PM ET hour of live coverage on MSNBC, anchor Contessa Brewer described the “firestorm” over a newly passed immigration law in Arizona and fretted: “does this lead to a situation where neighbors are turning in neighbors or families turning against families?”

    Later in the segment, a headline on screen read:
    “Law Makes it a Crime to be Illegal Immigrant.”



    • Can you say “ignorant statement” ?

      Law Makes it a Crime to be Illegal Immigrant

      Hahhahahahha !
      Who wrote that ? I would love to meet that bright soul ! Duhhhhh !
      Lights are on but no one is home !

  22. New Mexico, Dallas, and Utah will be getting an influx of illegals!

    Illegal Immigrants Plan to Leave Over Ariz. Law
    28 Apr 2010

    Many of the cars that once stopped in the Home Depot parking lot to pick up day laborers to hang drywall or do landscaping now just drive on by.

    Arizona’s sweeping immigration bill allows police to arrest illegal immigrant day laborers seeking work on the street or anyone trying to hire them. It won’t take effect until summer but it is already having an effect on the state’s underground economy.

    “Nobody wants to pick us up,” Julio Loyola Diaz says in Spanish as he and dozens of other men wait under the shade of palo verde trees and lean against a low brick wall outside the east Phoenix home improvement store.

    Many day laborers like Diaz say they will leave Arizona because of the law, which also makes it a crime to be in the U.S. illegally and directs police to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal immigrants

    Standing near potted trees and bushes for sale at a Home Depot in east Phoenix, Diaz, 35, says he may follow three families in his neighborhood who moved to New Mexico because of the law. He says a friend is finding plenty of work in Dallas.

    Jose Armenta, a 33-year-old illegal immigrant from Mexico’s western coast, is already planning to move to Utah within the next 20 days because of a combination of the economy and the new law. “A lot of people drive by,” he says as he watched nearby cars speeding past, “and they yell, ‘Hey, go back to Mexico!'”


  23. Jews Turn Against Obama
    28 Apr 2010
    By: Ronald Kessler Snips

    In a stunning turnaround, President Obama has lost roughly half of his support among Jewish voters.
    A poll by McLaughlin and Associates found that, while 78 percent of Jewish voters cast their ballots for Obama, only 42 percent of Jewish voters would vote to re-elect him. A plurality — 46 percent — would consider voting for anyone else. That compares with 21 percent who voted for John McCain.

    Obama’s speeches have been “inimical to Israel and supportive of the stream of false Palestinian Arab claims concerning Israel,”

    Klein says. “He is relentlessly pressuring Israel while applying virtually almost no pressure on the Palestinian Authority to fulfill its written obligations. He is worse than Jimmy Carter was when he was president. It was so obvious if you just looked at Obama’s associations before he was elected. Jews simply ignored that.”

    “The majority of Jews now realize that this guy is bad for Israel, let alone bad for America,” Klein says.


  24. OT — You gotta see this….it is an UNbelievable picture of “strategy”….look familiar ???

    http://www.blackfive.net/main/2010/04/why-coin-wont-work-in-afghanistan.html (By Crush)

    Click to home page of Blackfive and read Uncle Jimbo’s diagnosis “perpetual grad student syndrome” under Secure Freedom Radio !! etc.

    National Enquirer ^ | 04/30/10

    Posted on Friday, April 30, 2010 10:27:32 PM by MissesBush

    PRESIDENT OBAMA has been caught in a shocking cheating scandal after being caught in a Washington, DC Hotel with a former campaign aide, sources say.

    And now, a hush-hush security video that shows everything could topple both Obama’s presidency and marriage to Michelle!

    A confidential investigation has learned that Obama first became close to gorgeous 35 year-old VERA BAKER in 2004 when she worked tirelessly to get him elected to the US Senate, raising millions in campaign contributions.

    While Baker has insisted in the past that “nothing happened” between them, the ENQUIRER has learned that top anti-Obama operatives are offering more than $1 million to witnesses to reveal what they know about the alleged hush-hush affair.

    Among those being offered money is a limo driver who says that he took Vera to a secret hotel rendezvous where the President was staying.

    On the condition of anonymity, the limo driver said he took Baker “from a friend’s home in the DC area to the Hotel George where I learned later that Obama would be spending the night.”

    The driver recalled that he “waited in the lobby while she went to change her outfit.

    “But to the best of my knowledge she did not have a room at the hotel and she was not staying there so I thought that it was a bit odd.”


    • There is a death certificate in NY in the name of Renee O, a baby girl that died at 3 mo. believed to be a child of that affair.

      • AOne, Wasn’t that baby’s name Renee Albina ?
        Like Clay Albin on American Idol ? That is how I always remember her. Diss found her at TD. I think it was in Mass. or Maryland ? She found it back then.

        • Albina

          That Soundex code again.

        • I may have gotten the state wrong but the name you had was right……I think that name matched
          a distant relative…..

          It’s been awhile……..need to see if the old files are still around…….

          I think they sent her to St croix or one of the islands

    • Love it…wish they had a picture of Vera. Thought she was sent to some island for R & R.

      Who will tell Michelle that it is on the front page of the National Enquirer? After all, they did report on John Edwards.


      • Some say that article is smoke to screen coming bombshell of relationship with Reggie Love.

        OT but did anyone else read about all the big boys at that oil rig that went poof ?
        Some people are writing that is was a torpedo
        from N.Korea as rig built by S.Korea, or visa versa. It was late when I read it.
        Is that not a strange spin on things ?
        Installer-Haliburton, says they had no leak there at the seal. Really odd story. Something going on there ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s