Obama, the Marxist

by Miri

We the People of the United States of America have ALL got to stop calling the POTUS a socialist, ASAP.  There’s no doubt about it–as the Krewe here at  WTPOTUS have proclaimed for a long, long time:  he’s actually a MARXIST.

All quotes in italics come from the writings of Marx or from works written about Marx, via Wikipedia:

“The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.”

Seize our 401k’s, IRA’s, and all public lands.  Tie up all natural resources, under the guise of environmentalism.  Nationalize auto companies; hamstring banks; “help” homeowners facing foreclosure (in effect, government owns the real estate); take over student loans; nationalize health care.  Redistribute wealth, by any means necessary.  Even redistribute teachers, in order to equalize “access” to good teachers and, therefore, to opportunity.  (How that would work,  only Obama knows.  FORCE them to relocate?)  All this:  To what end?

“Communism differs from all previous movements in that it overturns the basis of all earlier relations of production and intercourse, and for the first time consciously treats all natural premises as the creatures of hitherto existing men, strips them of their natural character and subjugates them to the power of the united individuals.”

Subjugates them to the power of the united individuals.  Need I say more?

The bourgeoisie “has pitilessly torn asunder the motley of ties that bound man to his ‘natural superiors,’ and left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous ‘cash payment.'”

Who are these bourgeoisie?

“The middle or merchant classes” who “derived social and economic power from employment, education, and wealth, as distinguished from social classes whose power came from being born into an aristocratic family of titled land owners granted feudal privileges by the monarch.”  Also known as “the social class that owns the means of production in a capitalist society.”

Obama makes war upon the merchants and the middle class.  Listen to how he talks about bankers, CEOs, insurance executives, owners of companies, large and small.  By contrast, he loves the proletariat, aka, the “citizens of a lower class,” alternately described as “people who had no wealth other than their sons.”   In other words, the poor underclass–those he can exploit and manipulate for his own ends.

But in the Marxist schema, who are those who comprise man’s “natural superiors?”  Notice how Marx was against the middle class, but not necessarily the aristocracy.  So in Obama’s world, who are the common man’s “natural superiors?”  Would these be the elite?  Educated constitutional scholars or born “aristocrats” like himself, Sunstein, and Emanuel, perhaps?

Would he argue with anyone that he is NOT the natural superior of the vast bulk of We the People?  Of course not.  Just consider his usual pose, snoot in the air.  See how he disdains us, mocks us, ridicules us at every turn.  See how he and his wife live: dining on Kobe beef while the proletariat await the crumbs falling from his table.  How does his idol Castro live, whilst the bulk of Cuba’s people languish in poverty?

Obama himself recently snarked, “I am not a socialist.”  His usual, smirking, in your face, juvenile game, wherein he laughs at us as he thinks that he’s put one  over on us yet  again.   Pulled the wool over our eyes.  Of course, he’s not a socialist.  He’s telling the truth.   He’s not a socialist.  That’s too mild.  He’s not a progressive, either.  Again, too mild.  No, he IS a Marxist, otherwise known as a Communist.  Why wouldn’t he be?  His mother was.  His grandparents were.  His mentors were.

“Law, morality, religion, are to him [the Marxist/communist] so many bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests.”

Do you know of someone currently in power who’s shredding the law, particularly the Constitution?  Attacking religion and morality?

“The working men [the proletariat] have no country. We cannot take away from them what they have not got.”

Sound familiar?  America is a “mean” country.  Does he believe that America is his country?  Does he have any respect for the office that he holds?  Or, when he puts his feet up on the Oval Office desk, does he clearly demonstrate the disdain that he feels towards this country, its symbols, its history?  Therefore, is he justified when he destroys America as we know her because, in his Marxist philosophy, the proletariat belong not to this country? America is not their country, so who among them will mourn her passing?

“What the bourgeoisie therefore produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable.”

Ayers, Wright, Stern, Jones, Obama:  waiting for the gravediggers.

“We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence.”

The fundamental transformation of America?  He will create the conditions, if necessary.  The chaos that will allow the transformation he believes in.

“There is something in human history like retribution; and it is a rule of historical retribution that its instrument be forged not by the offended, but by the offender himself.”

Oooh.  Now here’s a good one:  Does he see himself–in his self-loathing, in the hatred he feels towards his White half and the other half of himself that is not truly, but pretends to be, of the “offended” class of Blacks in America–does he see himself as the “instrument” of retribution?  Is he the offender whose purpose in life is to help “his people,” the offended ones?  To deliver retribution?  “This is just like Christmas.”  “Now I don’t have to pay my mortgage because we got Obama.”

“No sooner is the exploitation of the labourer by the manufacturer, so far, at an end, that he receives his wages in cash, than he is set upon by the other portions of the bourgeoisie, the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker.”

In this attack against the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawnbroker, do you pick up just the slightest whiff of anti-Semitism or is that just me?  Such rhetoric also inspired Hitler.  Oh, wait.  It’s not just me.  Consider this quote from Marx:

“What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, selfishness. What is the secular cult of the Jew? Haggling. What is his secular god? Money. Well then, an emancipation from haggling and money, from practical, real Judaism would be the self emancipation of our age . . . The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”

Whew!  Indeed, one guy named McLellan, apparently trying to argue that Marx was not an anti-Semite, wrote that Marx “used the word Judentum colloquially, as meaning commerce, arguing that Germans suffer, and must be emancipated from, capitalism.”

Gee, that makes it all better, doesn’t it?  Jews = evil capitalist slaveholders.  Check.  Got it.  So remind me now why Obama dissed Netanyahu and swore that he will stand with the Muslims.  Wouldn’t he be the first to complain if someone equated the word Islam, colloquially, with terrorism?  (And rightfully so.)

“The monopoly of capital becomes a fetter upon the mode of production, which has sprung up and flourished along with, and under it. Centralisation of the means of production and socialisation of labour at last reach a point where they become incompatible with their capitalist integument. This integument is burst asunder. The knell of capitalist private property sounds. The expropriators are expropriated.”

The knell of capitalist private property sounds, once that integument bursts, at last.  Once centralization and socialization reach critical mass.  All in good time, my dears.  All in good time.  Then the “expropriators” will be “expropriated.”

An interesting definition from Wikipedia:  “Expropriation is politically motivated and forceful confiscation and redistribution of private property outside the common law, allegedly to establish social justice.”  Will the land itself be redistributed, a la Mugabe?   What then becomes of the expropriated?

The fundamental transformation of Amerika.  Obama admitted in his fictional, ghost-written autobiography that in college he sought out the Marxist professors, attended Marxist events, and by design surrounded himself with radicals and communists.

By their fruits, ye shall know them.  MARXIST!

Wake up, America, before it’s too late.