Face-to-Face with Young Marxist Obama

Face-to-Face with Young Marxist Obama: Remembering My Days as an
Anti-Apartheid Student Activist

By John Drew,  Posted by Newssleuth

Flipping through some old photos, I found this picture of me graduating from Occidental College on June 9, 1979. I’m wearing a red arm band. My parents were probably angry at me for doing this because it spoiled the graduation photo. Nevertheless, this photo has now come in handy as significant evidence that I was doing my part to protest Occidental College’s investments in South Africa. Moreover, it is part of the trail of documents that allows me to make the case that I was, indeed, a radical student who founded the anti-apartheid group which young President Obama spoke for a year and a half later on the Occidental College campus.<http://www.discover thenetworks. org/individualPr ofile.asp? indid=1511>

The fellow handing me my diploma was Occidental College president Richard C.
Gilman. I’m sure he didn’t care for me and I believed he was an evil guy.

From what Obama writes, I had the unusual opportunity to meet the young Barack Obama at a turning point in his life. In Dreams of My Father, Obama writes he got one of the early signs of his interest (and ability) in public speaking during his participation in a later anti-apartheid rally at Oxy in the fall of 1980.

I met Barack Obama face-to-face later that same year in late December 1980. By then, I was in my second year of graduate school at Cornell. I was doing my first, official teaching. The young Ann Coulter was a student in Theodore J. Lowi’s Introduction to American Government course in 1980 and I was the teaching assistant responsible for guiding her small group discussion section.

Back on the West Coast for Christmas break, I was visiting a girlfriend who was still attending Occidental College who introduced me to “Barry” Obama and his housemate Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, a wealthy Pakistani student.

My most vivid memory of my time visiting with Obama was the way he strongly argued a rather simple-minded version of Marxist theory. I remember he was passionate about his point of view. As I remember, he was articulating the same Marxist theory taught by various professors at Occidental College. Based on my more detailed studies at Cornell, I remember I made a strong argument that his Marxist ideas were not in line with contemporary reality – particularly the practical experience of Western Europe. <http://www.discover thenetworks. org/guideDesc. asp?catid= 115&type= issue>

I went on to become an assistant professor of political science at Williams College in MA, and won the William Anderson Award from the American Political Science Association for my doctoral dissertation.

See here

Obama, of course, became President of the United States in 2009. I can’t help but wonder if my common sense arguments ended up impacting his decision-making and career planning.

Nevertheless, I think my experience with the young Barack Obama is useful evidence of why he was able to win the trust and support of:

Bill Ayers<http://www.discover thenetworks. org/individualPr ofile.asp? indid=2169>

Bernardine Dohrn<http://www.discover thenetworks. org/individualPr ofile.asp? indid=2190>

Alice Palmer<http://www.discover thenetworks. org/individualPr ofile.asp? indid=2325>

In 1995, Alice Palmer represented the state of Illinois’ 13th District. After she decided to run for Congress she named Obama as her hand-picked successor. Palmer’s extremist ideology is evident in an article she wrote for the Communist Party USA’s newspaper, the People’s Daily World, now the People’s Weekly World in June, 1986. Amazingly, it detailed her experience at the 27th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Regarding Rev. Wright ‘s affection for Marxism and socialism, please view the YouTube video below. <http://www.discover thenetworks. org/individualPr ofile.asp? indid=2307>

My gut feeling is that Obama won the trust of folks like Alice Palmer because he never surrendered that uncompromising, Marxist socialist ideology I saw in him as a sophomore at Occidental College back in 1980.

My graduation photo helps me remember my days as a young revolutionary and the moments when – like Barack Obama – I sincerely believed a Marxist socialist revolution was coming to turn everything around and to create a new, fairer and more just world. Today, however, it pains me to write that I’m deeply ashamed of my radical views. With more maturity, I understand the true meaning of that red arm band. It is especially painful for me to look at it knowing that my time at Occidental College aligned with the brutal Khmer Rouge period (1975-1979) which covered the rule of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge over Cambodia <http://www.discover thenetworks. org/individualPr ofile.asp? indid=1998>

Nevertheless, I’m happy to revisit this unhappy chapter of my life if it
helps others better understand the sincere commitment to Marxist
revolutionary thought which animated me and the young President Obama.


B-Cast Interview of John Drew


63 responses to “Face-to-Face with Young Marxist Obama

  1. Obama is a Marxist. I kind of thought so.

    • KUHNER: The United Socialist States of America

      By Jeffrey T. Kuhner

      President Obama is close to completing his socialist revolution. Since coming to power last year, he has sought relentlessly to transform America. From his days as a student radical, Mr. Obama has been obsessed with smashing the traditional free-market system. Like most leftists, he thinks capitalism is the enemy.

      “He was a Marxist-socialist in college,” said John C. Drew, who knew Mr. Obama as a university student, in an interview. “He kept talking about the need to overthrow capitalism in favor of a working-class revolution.”

      One of Mr. Obama’s favorite philosophers was Frantz Fanon, a post-colonial Marxist who championed Third World liberation movements. Fanon argued that the West – led by America – was based on racism, imperialism and the economic exploitation of the world’s poor. The only remedy was authoritarian socialism and a massive redistribution of wealth from Western nations to developing countries.

      Throughout his career, Mr. Obama has had radical associations. At Columbia University, while teaching constitutional law, he embraced postmodernist legal theory that maintains that the U.S. constitutional system presents an artificial veneer for liberty while actually advancing the economic interests of powerful white males. As a community organizer in Chicago, he studied and tried to mimic the activism of Saul Alinsky – a neo-Trotskyite who championed “permanent revolution.” His longtime associates, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are supporters of Marxist liberation and share a deep hatred for the United States. They believe only fundamental, sweeping change can redeem America.

      Rather than being a pragmatic centrist – as the mainstream media insists on portraying him – Mr. Obama is the very opposite: an ideologue who is pursuing his political project even at the risk of badly damaging the Democratic Party.

      This explains his bizarre, almost reckless desire to ram Obamacare through Congress. The president has said he wants an “up-or-down vote” on his health care overhaul – preferably by the end of this month, before the Easter recess. In other words, he has given the green light to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, to use reconciliation, a parliamentary process designed to fast-track budgetary measures. Under these arcane rules, a simple majority in the Senate of 50 Democratic votes plus a tie-breaker from Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. will be enough to pass health care reform. The filibuster will be rendered impotent.

      This is unprecedented. Never in our history has reconciliation been used to pass a major piece of social legislation on a narrow partisan majority. Obamacare will overhaul nearly one-sixth of the U.S. economy. By contrast, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid passed with overwhelming bipartisan consensus. Contrary to popular myth, numerous Republicans endorsed the New Deal-Great Society welfare state. This is why repealing it has been so difficult (if not impossible).

      The White House and its media allies claim that the 1996 welfare reform bill, the 1997 children’s health insurance program and the 2001 Bush tax cuts were passed using reconciliation. This is misleading. Every one of these measures had strong Democratic support – especially in the Senate.

      Mr. Obama is engaged in an abuse of power. He is thwarting the will of the majority of the American people who do not want socialized medicine. They rightly fear that the proposal’s massive $1 trillion price tag will add to our skyrocketing national debt, which has brought us to the brink of ruin. They understand it will stifle medical innovation and reduce the quality of care, leading to rationing and longer waiting lines. It represents the greatest expansion of entitlement spending since the 1960s.

      Moreover, Mr. Obama’s actions are undermining the traditional system of checks and balances established by the Founding Fathers. The institutional role of the Senate is to serve as a bulwark against raw majority rule. By circumventing the filibuster, Mr. Obama is not only thumbing his nose at the voters – including those in Massachusetts who elected Republican Sen. Scott Brown – but the very constitutional safeguards meant to prevent this kind of usurpation of power.

      His proposal seeks to create a centrally planned medical economy that will erect a gigantic government bureaucracy based on massive taxes, subsidies and regulations. Mr. Obama is willing to sacrifice his party’s political fortunes in November – and even his own re-election in 2012 – because he understands one fundamental fact: Nationalized health care is the heart of cradle-to-grave statism. No country that has ever embraced socialized medicine – Canada, Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy – has ever been able to regain economic freedom.

      This is not because government-run health care is so effective or beloved; rather, it fosters a debilitating spirit of dependency that is fatal to a self-governing people. In short, it kills the self-reliance and individualism critical to a free-market democracy.

      For Mr. Obama, that is precisely the point. Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik Revolution, laid out the Marxist blueprint that has been followed by the radical left since 1917. Lenin urged that any disaster should be exploited to “hasten the destruction … of the capitalist class.” The 2008 Great Recession brought Mr. Obama to power. He has been seizing this crisis in order to overthrow the old capitalist order.

      Mr. Obama is relentlessly giving birth to a new nation: the United Socialist States of America – the U.S.S.A.


      • May there be a revolution in November to bring the Marxists to their knees and repeal all their ridiculous laws and bills they are passing. If Healthcare doesn’t pass, may he start quacking like the Lame Duck he’ll be! He is a criminal and is taking on every aspect of our economy. He and those supporting him haven’t helped our economy but have only hindered its recovery..exactly what they wanted to do!

      • Who said this?

        “But when legislation only has the support of the minority, the filibuster slows the legislation, prevents a senator from ramming it through and gives the American people enough time to join the opposition.

        Mr. President, the right to extended debate is never more important than when one party controls Congress and the White House. In these cases, the filibuster serves as a check on power and preserves our limited government.

        For 200 years we’ve had the right to extended debate. It’s not some procedural gimmick. It’s within the vision of the Founding Fathers of our country. They established a government so that no one person and no single party could have total control.

        Some in this chamber want to throw out 214 years of Senate history in the quest for absolute power. They want to do away with Mr. Smith, as depicted in that great movie, being able to come to Washington. They want to do away with the filibuster. They think they’re wiser than our Founding Fathers. I doubt that that’s true.”

        Harry Reid

  2. Great Post, Sleuth…thanks.

    Yeah, he’s a Marxist and certainly, a communist with a small c.

    He’s also the biggest liar on the face of the earth.

    Hope we live to see him tried for high crimes and treason one day. He would be in his glory with a captive audience.

  3. Great find News! Where the heck was this guy pre-election? Why is he just now speaking out? Is Occidental a communist training ground for radicals now? Why is he just now publicizing this information? If all of Obama’s radical background had been uncovered instead of being covered up he wouldn’t be sitting in the WH as a usurper. If the media hadn’t been in the tank for a communist, he still wouldn’t be there. Who is complicit now?

    Did Drew call him Barack Obama then or now? How was he known at Oxy by his school mates? Where are the other dozens that should recognize Obama?

    They (Obama and Drew and Others at Oxy) aligned themselves with another communist maniac, Pol Pot a communist leader! This wasn’t just Marxism. This was communism.

    Saloth Sar (May 19, 1928 – April 15, 1998), better known as Pol Pot, was the leader of the Cambodian communist movement known as the Khmer Rouge and was Prime Minister of Democratic Kampuchea from 1976–1979.

    Pol Pot became leader of Cambodia in mid-1975. During his time in power, Pol Pot imposed a version of agrarian collectivization, forcing city dwellers to relocate to the countryside to work in collective farms and forced labor projects, toward a goal of “restarting civilization” in a “Year Zero”. The combined effects of slave labor, malnutrition, poor medical care, and executions resulted in the deaths of an estimated 1.7 to 2.5 million people, approximately 21% of the Cambodian population.


      • From Wikipedia “Killing Fields” entry:

        Vietnam, with the backing of the Soviet Union, invaded Cambodia and removed Pol Pot from power in 1979.

        U.S. analyst Lawrence LeBlanc has suggested that the United States bowed to Chinese and ASEAN interests and voted for a UN seat for the Pol Pot regime.

        However, the USA claimed that the issue of seating a delegation was purely technical and legal, and that US support of seating the Pol Pot regime did not imply its approval of the regime’s policies, although key Jimmy Carter aide Zbigniew Brzezinski has admitted that the U.S. encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot, remarking in 1979 that “I encouraged the Chinese to support Pol Pot… Pol Pot was an abomination. We could never support him but China could.”

    • Past history of Communist governments are filled with mass killings and suppression of all opposition, food shortages, poor living conditions with lousy housing, few automobiles and no luxuries.

      Looks like that’s where O and his minions want us to be with all their “Green Initiatives” and “Sustainable Development” that initiate much more than just being kind to the environment but restrict property rights and ownership with extreme development and zoning regulations put into the general plans of many cities and towns throughout the country under the term “sustainable.”

  4. 21st Century, 2009 a. d.

    Barry Dunham Soetero: Federal Republic of United States, North America, Western Hemishpere


  5. Barry Dunham Soetero should be listed immediately. He is a class unto himself.

    Liar with a false biography; undocumented and fighting in federal courts all throughout the land using the Constititution’s subset laws to loophole through the system.


    Logan and Hatch Act offenses being hidden in the crevices of our right to investigate, indict and convict.

  6. Read this about the hit on the Hamas terrorist in Dubai
    It relates to this topic

  7. The Left’s Great Motivator
    By Scott Strzelczyk

    Enamored of the promise of a utopian society and aided by a complicit mainstream media, leftist ideologues constantly assail free-market capitalism, the Constitution, religion, and individual responsibility. Their actions are rooted in and justified by a dogmatic ideology. Their ideology is a charade providing a self-serving presumption of moral superiority to others.

    Dig deeper to reveal their greatest motivation: fear.

    Leftist ideologues comprising environmental extremists, progressives, liberals (the hijacked definition), socialists, and communists believe that the ends justify the means — that governance may use any means necessary to achieve predetermined outcomes. Characteristics of the leftist ideology include a heavily regulated economy and/or government owned industry, equal outcomes and economic leveling, multiculturalism, moral relativism, and the perfection of mankind.

    read the whole article:


  8. Chesa Boudin for President of the United States

    Here’s his dad, born American to American citizens on United States Of Ameria soil>>>



    Let’s be sure he lives in America for a period of 14 years after reaching the age 35 since or all else will not matter anymore.

    Barry Soetero has set precedent that allegiance no longer matters, so, Heads Up!

    How old will you be in the year 2020 and will you have the stamina to march on the Capitol?

    • “Chesa Boudin was adopted by Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, and raised as one of their three sons.”

      Do you know what names Ayers and Dohrn gave their biological sons?

      William Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn named their two children Zayd and Malik.

      Zayd is an Arabic name meaning “one who progresses and makes other people progress.” The most famous person in Islam named Zayd is Zayd ibn Harithah, who was the orphan boy fostered by the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

      Malik is an Arabic word meaning “king”. Malik is one of the names of Allah, “King” in the absolute sense.

      • Yep, Red Pill,

        Malika is also O’Bobblehead’s daughter’s name.

        Sasha is derived from Natash

        2020, they will be of the age of majority, as well.

        Zayed from the same root as Joe Stack’s wife’s name.

        • Papoose,
          I just noticed your comment above now.

          I had always thought Obama’s daughter as Malia, not Malika. If it really is Malika, that would be huge.

          And yes, I knew Natasha is Russian in origin. No surprise that Obama would honor the Russians.

  9. For CPAC and Beck, The Truth About the ACORN 8
    February 19, 2010 by Anita MonCrief SNIPS

    The ACORN 8’s habit of ignoring or hiding evidence to protect Obama was evident last year when a so-called Department of Justice complaint was amended at the last minute to protect Obama’s mentor Madeline Talbott and her husband, Keith Kelleher.

    Using the Glenn Beck Show as a launching pad, the ACORN 8 continued to conceal their radical roots and desire to protect Obama. In fact, ACORN 8 leader, Marcel Reid began her career with ACORN as a member of the Marxist New Party:

    “The fact that Obama received the New Party’s endorsement in his first run for office cannot be dismissed as insignificant. On the contrary, Obama’s ties to the New Party and the New Party’s backers at ACORN and the SEIU are long-standing, substantial, and reveal a great deal about his personal political allegiances. The New Party’s biggest wins in the country were in Chicago, including Obama’s victory in his 1996 run for the Illinois Senate. Chicago’s New Party was formed around two core elements, ACORN and the SEIU’s local 880. SEIU 880 was itself an ACORN offshoot.”


  10. The mere fact that Barky’s associates and benefactors are Marxist, small communists is enough to call people to arms.

    The media is complicit and we need to move on their Headquarters with the same determination and courage and in the same numbers the as Taxed Enough Already marchers did last Spring and Autumn.

    • They are plain old Communists and nothing less. That small “c” communist stuff is a bunch of crap they use to make themselves seem less threatening.

      They would take over our whole government all at once with revolution if they thought they could win.

      Instead they are eroding away our Constitution a tiny bit at a time.

      They are chicken shits, afraid to die and afraid to fail if they were to follow in the footsteps of their heroes Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Fidel.

  11. Chandoo said he has not seen nor talked with him since before Obama became a U.S. senator. However, under “community member,” the White House listed Chandoo as a guest at Obama’s Ramadan dinner last fall.

    When asked about that, Chandoo acknowledged from his home in Armonk, N.Y., that he attended the dinner. Despite the fact that fewer than 70 people were in attendance, Chandoo added, “I did not get a chance to see the boss.” He then said he shook hands with Obama in a receiving line.

  12. “Deconstructing Capitalism”…
    “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution”…

  13. The only newsperson I know of who interviewed Obama and/or Biden and asked the right questions…

    • Dang! That video is “no longer available due to a copyright claim by WFTV Channel 9”. Yeah, right, it was the copyright that made them scrub this!

      You can still see what people had to say about it at the time by going here:
      HotAir October 25, 2008:
      Comedy gold: WFTV interviews Biden

      She asked serious questions about whether or not the President’s agenda sounded like Marxism. Biden just laughed and said, “Is that a joke? Are you joking?”

      I’m a bit upset with Allahpundit for giving this the headline “Comedy gold” and saying, “Each question is funnier than the last”. This is not a laughing matter. Obama and Biden ARE Marxists, and they were allowed to laugh it off…

  14. Those Who Cannot Refute My Testimony on Obama’s College Marxism Embrace Their Only Option: Ad Hominem Attacks
    John Drew February 20, 2010

    My 15 minutes of fame regarding my insight into the Marxist ideology of young Barack Obama has also allowed me to restore some old friendships and ties originally developed while I was on the faculty in the political science department at Williams College in MA.

    I should have fought harder to call attention to the divisiveness and hatred caused by affirmative action by constantly reminding the world that my scholarship was well-respected outside of the Williams College political science department. The real problem is that I had a large U.S. flag displayed in my office and I went out of my way to wish the students Merry Christmas!


  15. Renee,

    This for you. I picked it up at RBO and note that thanks are due to Trevor Louden, as well.


    I may have posted the New Zeal article the other day, but forget where.

    • Wow Papoose, Thank you, Alot of names I have found in this read ! Amazing ! I have added it to the Chicago thread, since it is their area.Good catch !

  16. Good to read bits of confirmation from Dr. Drew about his past with POTUS. Many voters have the right to ask why he and many of the others who knew Barry kept silent for the last two years. In the age of the internet, this fellow comes with a scrubbed past, yet in every corner one finds a Marxist affair, kinky relationship, drugs and habits typical of those who do not end up in the White House. Every time a member of the media tried to talk some character from Columbia or Harvard, they withdrew and refused to speak. All university records were off limits. No one can verify where did the tuition money come from. Yet every one who knew him seems to have a nice comfortable job with no worries. The only ones left to worry were the ones who have to pay for the mistakes of those who voted for him, yet the ones who knew him, like the female photographer from Occidental College who released the damning photos of the hustling, pot smoking Barry, only after the election, in a case of pure public opinion manipulation, hiding key information from the public. I hope the she like all the others, feel good about the outcome. Kamikaze began on November 4. 2008.

  17. Papoose, I just now saw your comments re: BHO daughters’ names; actually, the oldest, is Malia, which is Hawai’ian for Maria (no R in Hawai’ian alphabet) and Sasha is not a girl’s name in Russian but a nickname for Alexander. My mother was Russian and she would call my son “Sasha” or “Sashka”. Natasha is a nickname for Natalie. People pretty much make up names these days and call girls “Madison” and such, so I am not putting too much store in what the Obamas’ daughters’ are called, cuz I don’t think they know what they are doing in most cases.

  18. Actually, it’s more likely that she was named Malia, because it’s a Swahili/Kenyan name that means “Queen”.

    The meme about Malia meaning Mary in Hawaiian sounds suspicious, like an effort to make her name sound Christian. Would a Muslim, for example, name a child Mary or any variant thereof?

    Of course, NOW one can find stories about Malia meaning Mary all over the Web. But when did those articles get posted?

    A search of 1900, 1910, and 1920 census files for the state of Hawaii shows only 42 records for someone named Malia, across those 30 years; and it’s likely some individuals were counted 3 times–once for each census. There were 1610 records for someone named Mary across those same 30 years.

    Articles on the Web that mention Malia as a Hawaiian name state that it means “bitter”.

    Sasha is most certainly a Russian nickname. The point being that it’s a RUSSIAN name.

  19. Communist In The White House?
    by Tamar Yonah

    Now, Yvonne may not be able to bear to read this blog or watch this video that someone sent me in an email, so my sympathies to her in advance. However, the good news is that the American People have woken up (those that choose to not hide their heads in the sand), to realize that the America they once knew, is almost gone. The question is though, “Is it too late?”.

    Some of you may be wondering, “Why is Tamar writing about the White House?”. The reason is, is because if there IS a communist on the White House, then this will have an adverse effect on Israel as well. Communism is an enemy of religious freedom, of Zionism, and of course, of G-d. And the reason for this is, that communism calls for complete obedience. The ‘collective’ or the ‘state’ is of all importance, and the people, the private person, is just a brick in the wall.

    One must give complete obedience to’ the state’ and not have any other ‘law’ or ‘belief’ which threatens one’s submission to the all powerful government. This is why religious people, people who believe in G-d and the Bible, are automatic ‘enemies of the state’. Because if they believe in a Higher Power, if they believe in G-d, then G-d’s law will surpass the State’s law, and this is unacceptable in communism. This is why the U.S.S.R. had to kill G-d. There was no room for G-d in a communist state. And this is why the Jews who lived in Soviet Russia were not allowed to be ‘Jewish’, to study Torah or learn Hebrew, or attend synagogue, or perform a circumcision, or celebrate any Jewish holidays. The U.S.S.R. stripped religion away from their population, turning them in to atheists with no higher or ‘divine’ law to adhere to.

    If communists in the White House (?) have their way, Bible believing Jews and Gentiles in the U.S.A. will also find themselves as ‘enemies of the state’ -without their wanting to. Right now, being a ‘religious’ person in ‘Amerika’ could conceivably be a crime. A G-d fearing person could be accused of ‘hate speech’ because he would counsel against sodomy – as G-d says it is an ‘abominable’ act. And recently, a new bill is being pushed in Massachusetts against circumcision on anyone without their consent. This would quite possibly mean that if this bill is passed, no Jew in Massachusetts would be able to circumcise their son until they were 18 years old, instead of 8 days old.

    As an aside, it amazes me that these liberals are so worried about any trauma a circumcision might cause a baby, but are pro-actively adamant when it comes to abortion. Seems to me that being murdered inside your mother’s womb is pretty traumatic…

    People who grew up loving America, its constitution, and their personal freedoms, will all of a sudden find themselves as targets of that same government they once loved. But I shall say again what Shifra Hoffman once said on my show, something akin to: “If Americans think that their constitution will save them, they better think again. The constitution is only as strong as the people willing to roll up their sleeves and defend it.” And with up to 30 million illegals, as well as a plethora of un-educated drop-outs and dumbed-down kids, and a lot of leftist liberals, democrats and progressives who make up a great deal of the population that would like to see ‘change’, then conservative patriotic Americans are going to have a hard time keeping their country from turning into a commie-zombie horror film.

    Let’s face it, as it is now, Americans can’t even get their president to produce his birth certificate to put to rest their legitimate concerns that he may not be eligible to hold the office of the presidency. Why don’t the courts enforce the law?

    Many Americans today believe that there has been a communist infiltration into the White House, and if they are correct, it is certainly a huge ‘change’ one can believe in.

    I once heard a conservative American radio talk show host recite a poem about Obama. It went something like this…

    “Roses are red,
    …and so is the White House!”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s